Chapter 2.29.) Hence the latter was very small, soft, and empty.

Moreover, one could feel nothing of the testicles in the inguinal

canal. On the other hand, the male organ was very small, but normally

developed. It was clear that this apparent hermaphrodite also was a

real male.

Another case of practical gynecomastism has been described by

Alexander von Humboldt. In a South American forest he found a solitary

settler whose wife had died in child-birth. The man had laid the

new-born child on his own breast in despair; and the continuous

stimulus of the child's sucking movements had revived the activity of

the mammary glands. It is possible that nervous suggestion had some

share in it. Similar cases have been often observed in recent years,

even among other male mammals (such as sheep and goats).

The great scientific interest of these facts is in their bearing on

the question of heredity. The stem-history of the mammarium rests

partly on its embryology (Chapter 2.24.) and partly on the facts of

comparative anatomy and physiology. As in the lower and higher mammals

(the monotremes, and most of the marsupials) the whole lactiferous

apparatus is only found in the female; and as there are traces of it

in the male only in a few younger marsupials, there can be no doubt

that these important organs were originally found only in the female

mammal, and that they were acquired by these through a special

adaptation to habits of life.

Later, these female organs were communicated to both sexes by

heredity; and they have been maintained in all persons of either sex,

although they are not physiologically active in the males. This normal

permanence of the female lactiferous organs in BOTH sexes of the

higher mammals and man is independent of any selection, and is a fine

instance of the much-disputed "inheritance of acquired characters."

The Evolution of Man — Volume 1 · 第 30 / 35 章