ON JOHN FLAMSTEED.

An account of the Rev. John Flamsteed,[669] the First

Astronomer-Royal.... By Francis Baily,[670] Esq. London, 1835, 4to.

Supplement, London, 1837, 4to.

My friend Francis Baily was a paradoxer: he brought forward things counter

to universal opinion. That Newton was impeccable in every point was the

national creed; and failings of temper and conduct would have been utterly

disbelieved, if the paradox had not come supported by very unusual

evidence. Anybody who impeached Newton on existing evidence might as well

have been squaring the circle, for any attention he would have got. About

this book I will tell a story. It was published by the Admiralty for

distribution; and the distribution was entrusted to Mr. Baily. On the eve

of its appearance, rumors of its extraordinary revelations got about, and

persons of influence applied to the Admiralty for copies. The Lords were in

a difficulty: but on looking at the list they saw names, as they {310}

thought, which were so obscure that they had a right to assume Mr. Baily

had included persons who had no claim to such a compliment as presentation

from the Admiralty. The Secretary requested Mr. Baily to call upon him.

"Mr. Baily, my Lords are inclined to think that some of the persons in this

list are perhaps not of that note which would justify their Lordships in

presenting this work."--"To whom does your observation apply, Mr.

Secretary?"--"Well, now, let us examine the list; let me see;

now,--now,--now,--come!--here's Gauss[671]--_who's Gauss_?"--"Gauss, Mr.

Secretary, is the oldest mathematician now living, and is generally thought

to be the greatest."--"O-o-oh! Well, Mr. Baily, we will see about it, and I

will write you a letter." The letter expressed their Lordships' perfect

satisfaction with the list.

There was a controversy about the revelations made in this work; but as the

eccentric anomalies took no part in it, there is nothing for my purpose.

The following valentine from Mrs. Flamsteed,[672] which I found among

Baily's papers, illustrates some of the points:

"3 Astronomers' Row, Paradise: February 14, 1836.

"Dear Sir,--I suppose you hardly expected to receive a letter from me,

dated from this place; but the truth is, a gentleman from our street was

appointed guardian angel to the American Treaty, in which there is some

astronomical question about boundaries. He has got leave to go back to

fetch some instruments which he left behind, and I take this opportunity of

making your acquaintance. That America has become a wonderful place since I

was down among you; you have no idea how grand the fire at New York {311}

looked up here. Poor dear Mr. Flamsteed does not know I am writing a letter

to a gentleman on Valentine's day; he is walked out with Sir Isaac Newton

(they are pretty good friends now, though they do squabble a little

sometimes) and Sir William Herschel, to see a new nebula. Sir Isaac says he

can't make out at all how it is managed; and I am sure I cannot help him. I

never bothered my head about those things down below, and I don't intend to

begin here.

"I have just received the news of your having written a book about my poor

dear man. It's a chance that I heard it at all; for the truth is, the

scientific gentlemen are somehow or other become so wicked, and go so

little to church, that very few of them are considered fit company for this

place. If it had not been for Dr. Brinkley,[673] who came here of course, I

should not have heard about it. He seems a nice man, but is not yet used to

our ways. As to Mr. Halley,[674] he is of course not here; which is lucky

for him, for Mr. Flamsteed swore the moment he caught him in a place where

there are no magistrates, he would make a sacrifice of him to heavenly

truth. It was very generous in Mr. F. not appearing against Sir Isaac when

he came up, for I am told that if he had, Sir Isaac would not have been

allowed to come in at all. I should have been sorry for that, for he is a

companionable man enough, only holds his head rather higher than he should

do. I met him the other day walking with Mr. Whiston,[675] and disputing

about the deluge. 'Well, Mrs. Flamsteed,' says he, 'does old Poke-the-Stars

understand gravitation yet?' Now you must know that is rather a sore point

with poor dear Mr. Flamsteed. He says that Sir Isaac is as crochetty about

the moon as ever; and as to {312} what some people say about what has been

done since his time, he says he should like to see somebody who knows

something about it of himself. For it is very singular that none of the

people who have carried on Sir Isaac's notions have been allowed to come

here.

"I hope you have not forgotten to tell how badly Sir Isaac used Mr.

Flamsteed about that book. I have never quite forgiven him; as for Mr.

Flamsteed, he says that as long as he does not come for observations, he

does not care about it, and that he will never trust him with any papers

again as long as he lives. I shall never forget what a rage he came home in

when Sir Isaac had called him a puppy. He struck the stairs all the way up

with his crutch, and said puppy at every step, and all the evening, as soon

as ever a star appeared in the telescope, he called it puppy. I could not

think what was the matter, and when I asked, he only called me puppy.

"I shall be very glad to see you if you come our way. Pray keep up some

appearances, and go to church a little. St. Peter is always uncommonly

civil to astronomers, and indeed to all scientific persons, and never

bothers them with many questions. If they can make anything out of the

case, he is sure to let them in. Indeed, he says, it is perfectly out of

the question expecting a mathematician to be as religious as an apostle,

but that it is as much as his place is worth to let in the greater number

of those who come. So try if you cannot manage it, for I am very curious to

know whether you found all the letters. I remain, dear sir, your faithful

servant,

"MARGARET FLAMSTEED.

Francis Baily, Esq.

"P.S. Mr. Flamsteed has come in, and says he left Sir Isaac riding

cockhorse upon the nebula, and poring over it as if it were a book. He has

brought in his old acquaintance Ozanam,[676] who says that it was always

his maxim on {313} earth, that 'il appartient aux docteurs de Sorbonne de

disputer, au Pape de prononcer, et au mathematicien d'aller en Paradis en

ligne perpendiculaire.'"[677]

A Budget of Paradoxes, Volume I · 第 147 / 198 题