JOHN GRAUNT AS A PARADOXER.

Natural and Political Observations ... upon the Bills of Mortality. By

John Graunt, citizen of London. London, 1662, 4to.[215]

This is a celebrated book, the first great work upon mortality. But the

author, going _ultra crepidam_, has attributed to the motion of the moon in

her orbit all the tremors which she gets from a shaky telescope.[216] But

there is another paradox about this book: the above absurd opinion is

attributed to that excellent mechanist, Sir William Petty, who passed his

days among the astronomers. Graunt did not write his own book! Anthony

Wood[217] hints that Petty "assisted, or put into a way" his old

benefactor: no doubt the two friends talked the matter over many a time.

Burnet and Pepys[218] state that Petty wrote the book. It is enough for me

that {114} Graunt, whose honesty was never impeached, uses the plainest

incidental professions of authorship throughout; that he was elected into

the Royal Society because he was the author; that Petty refers to him as

author in scores of places, and published an edition, as editor, after

Graunt's death, with Graunt's name of course. The note on Graunt in the

_Biographia Britannica_ may be consulted; it seems to me decisive. Mr.

C. B. Hodge, an able actuary, has done the best that can be done on the

other side in the _Assurance Magazine_, viii. 234. If I may say what is in

my mind, without imputation of disrespect, I suspect some actuaries have a

bias: they would rather have Petty the greater for their Coryphaeus than

Graunt the less.[219]

Pepys is an ordinary gossip: but Burnet's account has an animus which is of

a worse kind. He talks of "one Graunt, a Papist, under whose name Sir

William Petty[220] published his observations on the bills of mortality."

He then gives the cock without a bull story of Graunt being a trustee of

the New River Company, and shutting up the cocks and carrying off their

keys, just before the fire of London, by which a supply of water was

delayed.[221] It was one of the first objections made to Burnet's work,

that Graunt was _not_ a trustee at the time; and Maitland, the historian of

London, ascertained from the books of the Company that he was not admitted

until twenty-three days after the breaking out of the fire. Graunt's first

admission {115} to the Company took place on the very day on which a

committee was appointed to inquire into the cause of the fire. So much for

Burnet. I incline to the view that Graunt's setting London on fire strongly

corroborates his having written on the bills of mortality: every practical

man takes stock before he commences a grand operation in business.

A Budget of Paradoxes, Volume I · 第 65 / 198 题