ON INHABITABLE PLANETS.

A discourse concerning a new world and another planet, in two books.

London, 1640, 8vo.[171]

Cosmotheoros: or conjectures concerning the planetary worlds and their

inhabitants. Written in Latin, by Christianus Huyghens. This

translation was first published in 1698. Glasgow, 1757, 8vo. [The

original is also of 1698.][172]

The first work is by Bishop Wilkins, being the third edition, [first in

1638] of the first book, "That the Moon may be a Planet"; and the first

edition of the second work, {101} "That the Earth may be a Planet." [See

more under the reprint of 1802.] Whether other planets be inhabited or not,

that is, crowded with organisations some of them having consciousness, is

not for me to decide; but I should be much surprised if, on going to one of

them, I should find it otherwise. The whole dispute tacitly assumes that,

if the stars and planets be inhabited, it must be by things of which we can

form some idea. But for aught we know, what number of such bodies there

are, so many organisms may there be, of which we have no way of thinking

nor of speaking. This is seldom remembered. In like manner it is usually

forgotten that the _matter_ of other planets may be of different chemistry

from ours. There may be no oxygen and hydrogen in Jupiter, which may have

_gens_ of its own.[173] But this must not be said: it would limit the

omniscience of the _a priori_ school of physical inquirers, the larger half

of the whole, and would be very _unphilosophical_. Nine-tenths of my best

paradoxers come out from among this larger half, because they are just a

little more than of it at their entrance.

A Budget of Paradoxes, Volume I · 第 57 / 198 题