A family is usually composed of several persons, all of whom should be

treated with justice. If it is reduced to two only,--if there is only

mother and child to decide between,--the decision should be fairly

balanced. The practical issues of daily life are almost always open to

a child's understanding.

Mamma, we will say, is reading. Mabel is busy with doll's dressmaking.

"O mamma! will you please get me the scissors?"

"Can you not get them as easily, dear?"

"I don't know just where they are, and I've been fussing ever so long

with this yoke; and now I've got it just right, and I'm afraid, if I

put it down, I'll forget again!"

Mamma looks at the flushed, earnest little face, lays her book down,

and gets the scissors.

Again. Mamma is stuffing the turkey. "Mabel, will you please bring me

down the largest needle on my cushion?"

"Oh, but, mamma, I'm so busy with my paints!"

"Yes; but you are upstairs already, and my hands are in the stuffing.

Please hurry, dear."

Mabel brings the needle promptly. She knows that mamma is considerate

of her, and she is considerate of mamma.

It is by no means necessary to argue over every little service, but a

few test cases keep in mind the idea of justice. If what a child wants

will give more pleasure to the child than trouble to the adult, do it.

If it is more trouble to the adult than pleasure to the child, do not

do it; and let the child understand, first, last, and always, the

balance of human rights.

I knew a girl of thirteen who had not yet learned to keep herself

covered at night. She slept with her mother; and, if she wakened

chilly, she would murmur, without opening her eyes, "Mother, cover me

up!" And her mother would do it. This was unfair to the child. It

allowed her to commit a gross injustice; and her mother was

"compounding a felony," as it were, in indulging her. The child was

already awake, and quite capable of pulling up the blankets. There was

no reason why her tired mother should lose sleep for the purpose. The

practical way to exhibit this would be for the mother to waken the

child with the same demand. A few applications would be sufficient. If

verbal remonstrance was preferred (usually an inferior method), the

mother might quietly reply: "By no means. You are perfectly able to do

it. It is not fair to waken me for that. I do not get to sleep again

as quickly as you do, and am tired next day." A child already

reasonably trained would easily see the force of that argument.

A big boy is persistently late to breakfast. This annoys his mother at

the time, and delays her work afterward. She saves and keeps hot

various viands for him, taking many extra steps; and her day's work

is rendered a little more difficult. If the breakfast hour is that

most convenient to the family needs, simply explain to the boy that

breakfast is at such a time only; that he will be called in due

season; and that, if he is not down within the given time, he will

find no breakfast whatsoever. This course, firmly followed, works like

a charm. Most people dislike going without breakfast. A child should

have sufficient sleep, of course; but, if his hours are reasonable,

there is no justice in incommoding the working mother for the sake of

a little natural laziness. With very little children we ingeniously

manage to ignore some of their really important questions and actions,

and at the same time to let them trample on our ears and brains with

senseless iteration of unnecessary words.

A small boy is eating his supper, while his mother puts little sister

to bed.

"Mother!" he bawls. "Mother! Mo-o-ther!"

At last she leaves her task to come to him, he still shouting; and

this is his communication: "Mother! This is baker's bread!"

"Yes, dear," says the too tender mamma, and goes back again.

That child should have been met, not with anger or punishment, but

with very simple sarcasm and protest.

"Yes, that is baker's bread,--and that is a plate,--and that is a

spoon. I knew all these things when I arranged your supper. Do you

think it is fair to call me downstairs just to say that?"

The bubbling fluency of a child's mind, the tendency to repetition and

sometimes foolishness, is natural enough, and not to be blamed; but we

should help the child to outgrow it instead of submitting to his

wearisome reiterance.

"But, my dear, you said that before. I understand. Now do not say it

again."

To say, "Yes, dear," a dozen times to the same question or statement

is not strengthening to the child's mental habits. Similarly, when a

child asks palpably foolish questions,--foolish by his own

standard,--he needs not consideration, but mild ridicule. And, if he

can answer his own question, let him: it is no kindness to do all his

work. Children are not benefited by a too soft and yielding

environment, nor do they always love best those who treat them with

too much consideration. Fairness, not severity nor constant

concession, is what a child appreciates. If we behave fairly to the

child (as we would to a grown person), giving to him the healthy

reaction of common justice, we help him to live easily and rightly in

the world before him.

Even love is open to measurement by results. The love we have for our

children is not developed in us as a pleasurable exercise, but is

distinctly for the child's benefit. "The maternal sacrifice" is what

our scientific friends call it. In studying early forms of life, we

find the mother sacrificing everything for the good of the young, from

which we draw the general inference that it is for the good of the

young to have the mother sacrifice everything. More discriminating

study will show us a great difference in maternal methods. Where the

mother's loss is the gain of the young, she cheerfully submits to it;

but, where the young is not benefited by her loss, we do not find it.

The eggs of the hen are carefully brooded by the mother; the eggs of

the frog are left floating on the water in suitable places. There is

no special virtue in the hen's brooding or vice in the frog's neglect;

the mother does what is necessary for the young. The mother-cat licks

her little ones elaborately, and teaches them to make their toilettes

similarly. The cow licks the calf for a while, but gives it no

instructions in washing its ears with its paws.

The mother-love is essential to the best care of the young, and

therefore it is given us. It is the main current of race preservation,

and the basis of all other love-development on the higher grades. But

it is not, therefore, an object of superstitious veneration, and in

itself invariably right. The surrender of the mother to the child is

often flatly injurious, if carried to excess. To put it in the last

extreme, suppose the mother so utterly sacrifices herself to the child

as to break down and die. She then robs the child of its mother, which

is an injury. Suppose she so sacrifices herself to the child as to

cut off her own proper rest, recreation, and development. She thus

gives the child an exhausted and inferior mother, which is an injury

to him. There are cases, perhaps, where it might be a mother's duty to

die for her child; but, in general, it is more advantageous to live

for him. The "unselfish devotion" of the mother we laud to the skies,

without stopping to consider its effect on the child. This error is

connected with our primitive religious belief in the doctrine of

sacrifice,--one of those early misconceptions of a great truth.

It is necessary for the good of humanity that the interests of the one

be subordinate to the interests of the many, but it does not follow

that an indiscriminate surrender of one's own interests always

benefits society. On the contrary, a steady insistence on the rights

of the individual is essential to the integrity of the social

structure and its right workings. So it is necessary for the good of

the child that the interests of the mother be subordinated to his

interests, but it does not follow that her indiscriminate surrender

of personal interests always benefits him. On the contrary, a too

self-sacrificing mother tends to develope a selfish, short-sighted,

low-grade personality in the growing life she seeks to benefit, where

her honest maintenance of her own individual rights would have had a

very healthy effect. Not what the child wishes, nor what the mother

wishes, is the standard of measurement, but what is really beneficial

to the child. If the mother is frankly and clearly unselfish in their

daily intercourse, and then as frankly and clearly demands her own

share of freedom and consideration, the child gets a fairer view of

human rights than if he simply absorbs his mother as a natural victim.

Little Mary has a visitor. Her mother is most polite and entertaining,

is with them when they desire it, and lets them alone when they

prefer. Then her mother has a visitor. "Mary," she says, "I am to have

company this week. I shall of course have to give a good deal of time

and attention to my friend, as you did to Hattie when she was here.

So you must not feel badly if you do not see as much of mamma as

usual."

There must be the previous polite conduct of mamma to point to. The

childish mind needs frequent and conspicuous proof that mamma is

forgetting herself for his pleasure; and then he should be rationally

called upon to forget himself for her pleasure, when it is plainly

fair and necessary.

The beautiful principles of kindergarten teaching are frequently

misapplied in the too conciliatory and self-denying methods of the

well-meaning mamma. Kindness, politeness, constant love, and all due

consideration the child should have; but justice is as important to

him as affection. It must always be remembered that the mother's love

is not an end in itself, nor the expression of it a virtue in itself.

It is to be measured, like every other natural function, by its use.

When a child is reared in an atmosphere of unreasoning devotion and

constant surrender, he grows up to expect it, and to carry a sense of

grievance if he does not get it. The natural tendency of the mother

to love her own young is strong in us,--the maternal passion; but,

like all passions, it needs conscientious and rational restraint. The

human soul has grown to such a stage of development that we are

capable of loving and serving great numbers of people. The woman, who

is still confined to the same range of interests which occupied her in

the earliest grades of human life, inherits her share of this socially

developed power of loving, and concentrates it all upon her own

immediate family.

Like an ever-enlarging burning glass, still focussed upon one spot,

the healthy, natural affection of the animal mother for its young has

grown to what is really an immense social affection, too large for one

family to profitably sustain. The child will get a far more just and

healthful idea of human relation when he finds himself lifted and led

on by a mother whose life has a purpose of its own, than when he finds

himself encompassed and overwhelmed by a mother who has no other

object or interest than himself.

The whole question has to be constantly measured by comparing it with

the rest of life. Are our methods with children those which best fit

men and women for doing their share to maintain and develope human

life? Does not the most casual survey of life to-day show people

practising much amiability and devotion at home, strenuously loving

their own immediate families and friends, and most markedly deficient

in that general love for one another which is not only the main

commandment of our religion, but the plainest necessity for social

progress? And is not this deficiency to be accounted for, not by any

inability on our part for social devotion,--for every day's list of

accidents shows the common fund of heroism and self-sacrifice to be

large,--but by the training which makes it the habit of our lives to

love and serve only those nearest to us?

The mother is the strongest formative influence in the child's life.

If he sees that she thinks only of him, lives only for him, what is he

to learn by it? To think only of himself? Or only of her? Or only of

his children? Does the best care of a child require the concentrated

and unremittent devotion of an entire mother?

A larger intelligence applied to the subject may show us that there

are better ways of serving our children than those we now follow. The

woman who grows up in the practice of considering the needs of people

in general, and of so ordering her life as to benefit them, will find

a new power and quality in her love for her own dear ones. With that

widening of the soul-range of the mother will come a capacity to judge

the child as one of the people of the world, besides being her own

especially beloved. A study of what all children need will help her to

understand what her own child needs far more accurately than when she

thinks of him as the only one. The continuous application of the

mother to the child is not so advantageous as the quality of her

companionship and influence, and her sacrificial devotion too often

weakens his sense of justice and makes him selfish.

XI.

SIX MOTHERS.

Broad-minded mothers of this time are keenly interested in

child-study, in that all too familiar and yet unknown field of "infant

psychology." They are beginning to recognise not only the salient fact

that "all children are different," but the equally important one that

all children have points in common.

The need of union and discussion among mothers is resulting in the

mothers' clubs and parents' congresses, which form so noble an example

of the progressive thought.

But so far, with all the kindly interest and keen desire for improved

methods of child-culture, the mother has to return and grapple with

her individual problem alone.

Here are one or two simple and practical suggestions, the careful

pursuance of which, with some clear record of proceedings, would not

only be of immediate assistance to the mothers concerned, but to all

the other mothers yet to be aroused to the importance of such action.

Let us suppose six mothers, to take a very low number,--six mothers in

one town, one village, or one city, even in the open country, so that

they could reach each other easily; six mothers, who were friends and

"social equals," and who were willing to admit the deficiencies of our

general present methods of child-culture, and also willing to improve

those methods. It is permissible for each mother to imagine that her

own methods are superior to those of the other mothers, as this will

give her a beautiful sense of helpfulness in allowing these superior

methods to be observed and studied by the less able.

A conscious sense of inferiority is also no obstacle, for a mother

having that feeling would be eager to improve by study of the better

ways.

These six mothers divide the working days of the week among them,

agreeing that each shall on her chosen day take charge of the children

of the other five. This might be for a part of the day or the whole

day, as is thought best,--let us suppose it merely for the afternoon;

and it could be limited, as desired, to children of a certain age,

and still further reduced, as a mild beginning, to one child apiece

from each family.

This would give, as a minimum, five extra children on one afternoon a

week to each mother. The maximum would be of course uncertain; but, if

all the children of each mother were thus to go visiting for any part

of the day, it would give to each one day in which that larger

responsibility was undertaken, and five days free. There would remain

Sunday, in which each family, complete, would be at home.

Now let us take a hypothetical case, and suppose that our six mothers,

with considerable trepidation, have chosen one child apiece that they

were willing to intrust for the afternoon to the watchful care of

these familiar friends. The children, be it rigidly insisted, are to

know nothing whatever of the purposes or methods involved. All that

little Johnny Black knows is that Mrs. White has asked him to come

over on Monday afternoon and play with Alice and Billy White, and some

other children that he knows, too; that presently Mrs. Green has them

come to her house on Tuesday, and Mrs. Brown on Wednesday; that his

mamma lets them all come and play with him on Thursday,--in short,

that his afternoons have become full and rich and pleasantly exciting,

like some wonderful procession of parties.

"Not like regular parties, either," Johnny would explain. "You don't

have to dress up--much,--just be clean, to begin with. And they don't

have ice-cream and macaroons,--only just milk and crackers when you

get hungry; and--well, 'tisn't so much regular games and p'r'aps

dancin'--like a party,--we just play. And Mrs. White, or whichever one

'tis, she generally has some nice young lady in with her; and they

sort of keep things going,--as if 'twas a real party. It's nicer some

ways, I think."

"And which place do you like best, Johnny?"

"Oh, I do' know! Billy White has the biggest yard. But Jim Grey has

the best swing; and there's a pond at Susy Green's,--a real pond,--and

nothing but girls live there! Then it's lots of fun when they come to

our house, 'cause I can show 'em my rabbits and make Jack do all his

tricks."

Yes, the children all enjoy it. It means variety, it means company, it

means a wider and closer acquaintance and all the benefits of

well-chosen association and larger environment. It fills a part of the

day. There is no more aimless asking, "What shall I do now?" with the

vague response, "Oh, run away and play!" or the suggestion of some

well-worn amusement.

It means, too, a little more sense of "company manners" and behaviour,

and, on the other hand, a better appreciation of home life.

And to the mother,--what good will this do her?

Each mother would have one day in the week in which to carefully

observe children,--_not_ her own specially beloved children, but just

children, as such. Her observation and care should be absolutely

unobtrusive: the moment the little ones knew they were being watched,

the value of the plan would be greatly impaired; and, to stop at a

minor detail, from the palpable necessity for doing this work without

the child's consciousness, mothers would learn to cover the machinery

of government at home. It is one of our grossest and most frequent

errors in the management of children that we openly discuss our

efforts and failures. They know that we are struggling to produce

certain results in their behaviour, usually in a futile manner.

With, however, a large and definite purpose resting so absolutely on

the child's unconsciousness, more wisdom in this line would soon

develope.

The mother who now says, "What would you do with a child like that?"

or "I'm sure I don't know what to do with that child!" before the

child in question, would soon perceive that such an attitude in an

educator does not produce confidence in the object of the education.

Quietly and unostentatiously, and often with the assistance of some

keen girl-friend, these mothers would soon learn to observe

accurately, to generalise carefully, to reduce cautiously, and then to

put the deduction into practice and observe the results.

As beginners, pioneers, they should make their first steps very

modestly. For the first season some one trait should be chosen for

study,--say self-control or courage or consideration of others. Having

decided on their line of observation, let each mother make a little

note of how high each child in the group stands in this line.

How much self-control has my Johnny, as measured by his age?--as

compared with others of his age? When did I first notice self-control

in Johnny? When have I seen it greatest? Does he gain in it? What

should be done to help Johnny gain in self-control? And then go over

the same questions with regard to the other children.

Then, with self-control as the characteristic, the natural development

and best education of which they wish to study, the afternoon parties

begin. At first the children might be left absolutely free to play in

ordinary lines. Then, after the first observations were recorded,

delicate experiments could be introduced, and their results added to

the record.

It is very difficult for the individual mother to rightly estimate

her own children. "Every crow thinks her babe the blackest."

Yet the character of the child is forming without regard to any fond

prejudice or too severe criticism; and his life's happiness depends on

his interaction with people in general, not simply with beloved ones

at home. The measure of Johnny's self-control may not seem important

to the parental love which covers or the parental force which compels;

but to Johnny's after-life its importance is pre-eminent. When one

sits for a portrait to a fond and familiar friend, and sees all

fondness and familiarity die out from the eyes of the artist, feels

one's personality sink into a mass of "values," it brings a strange

sense of chill remoteness. So, no doubt, to the mother heart the idea

of calmly estimating Johnny's self-control and comparing it with Jim

Grey's seems cold enough. To have Mrs. Grey estimate it,--and perhaps

(terrible thought!) to estimate it as less than Jim's,--this is hard,

indeed.

Yet this is precisely what is to be obtained in such a combination as

this, and in no other way,--the value of an outside observer, through

Mrs. Grey's estimate.

Nobody's opinion alters facts. The relative virtues of Johnny and Jim

remain unchanged, no matter what their respective mothers think or

what their irrespective mothers think. But each mother will derive

invaluable side-lights from the other mother's point of view.

Each opinion must be backed with illustration. Instances of observed

behaviour must be massed before any judgment has value.

"I think your Jim is so brave, Mrs. Grey. When the children were with

me the other day, the cow got loose; and the girls all ran. Some boys

ran, too; and Jimmy drove her back into the cow-yard."

"But Jimmy was the oldest," says Mrs. White. "Perhaps, if he'd been as

young as my Billy, he wouldn't have been so brave."

"And he is afraid of the dark," says Mrs. Brown. "At my house he

wouldn't go into the back cellar after apples, even with the other

children. Isn't he afraid of the dark, Mrs. Grey?"

Mrs. Grey admits this, but cites instances to show courage in other

directions. And always five dispassionate observers to the one deeply

loving and prejudiced.

If it should happen that Jimmy is generally admitted brave beyond his

years, with the one exception of fearing darkness, and that exception

traceable to a nurse-maid's influence, the mother of Jimmy is

rejoiced; and a strong light is thrown on the nurse question. If it

prove that by general opinion there is a lack of courage such as

should belong to his years, there is cause for special study and

special action in this line. Most valuable of all, the habit of

observing a child's behaviour as an expression of character is formed.

The six mothers would of course meet to compare notes, preferably in

evenings, when children were all in bed and fathers could be present;

and the usual difficulty of leaving home in the evening could be met

in such an important case as this by engaging some suitable person to

come in for an hour or two and stay with the sleeping little ones.

All such details would have to be arranged according to personal and

local conditions; but the end to be attained is of such enormous value

that considerable effort is justified in reaching it. Even in the

beginning, a usefulness would be found in the united interest, the

mutual helpfulness of the combined women, drawn together by the

infinite and beautiful possibilities of their great work. In the light

of other eyes, they would see their own children in new lights, and,

by careful following of agreed lines of treatment, soon learn with

some finality what would and what would not be useful in a given case.

The observations and experiments of one earnest group of mothers like

this would be a stimulus and help to uncounted thousands of ungrouped

mothers who are struggling on alone.

Concerning Children · 第 8 / 14 段