Tennyson, Frederick, 383

Tennyson, Hallam, 555

Thebes, 234

Theism, 93

Themistocles, Tomb of, 261

Thompson, Archbishop, 629, 645, 662, 675

Thornhill, Mark, 671, 672

Thring, Mr., 677

Trelawney, Mr., 258

Trench, Anne Power, 16

Trench, Jane Power, 176

Trench, Archdeacon, 177

Trench, Archbishop, 553

Trevelyan, Sir C., 541

Trieste, 264, 267

Trimleston, Lord, 8, 137

Trimmer, Mrs., 38

Trollope, Adolphus, 263, 269, 365, 381

Trollope, Anthony, 558

Trübner, 113, 400, 421

Truro, Lord, 668

Tufnell, Dr., 627

Tuam, Archbishop of, 12, 22, 177

Turin, 365

Turner, Mr., 210

Turvey, 8, 9

Twining, Louisa, 318, 327

Tyndall, Professor, 482, _seq._

Tyrone, Lord, 12

U

Umberto, 368

Unwin, Fisher, Messrs., 205, 422

Upsala, 643

Usedom, Count Guido, 365, 368, 371

V

Vambéry, Mons., 484

Vaughan, Rev. Mr., 87

Vaughan, Rev. Dr., 647

Venice, 258, 267, 365

Verona, 365

Vestiges of Creation, 194

Vesuvius, 226

Victor Emmanuel, 368, 388

Villari, Madame, 269, 381

Virchow, Dr., 634

Vivisection (Movement against), chapter xx.

Vogt, Carl, 490, 663

Voltaire, 94, 97

W

Waddy, Mr., 673

Wakeley, Dr., 673

Walker, Dr., 635

Warburton, Elliot, 183

Ward, Mrs. Humphry, 524

Warren, Mr., 464

Waterford, Marquis of, 12, 23, 174

Watson, William, 558

Watts, Dr., 37

Watts, G. F., 456

Weber, Baron, 661, 671

Webster, Mrs., 577, 586

Wedgwood, Mr. H., 646

Wedgwood, Miss Julia, 578, 646

Weiss, Mr., 375

Wellborne, 7

Welldon, Mr., 677

Wellesley, 20, 209

Wellington, Duke of, 629

Weston, 20

Whately, Archbishop, 196

White, Blanco, 97

White, Rev. H., 532

White, Mrs., 662

Wicksteed, Rev. P., 524

Wilberforce, Canon, 671

Wilhelm, Emperor, 366

Willard, Miss, 607

Williams & Norgate, Messrs., 422, 471

Wilmot, Sir Eardley, 669

Windeyer, W. C., 334

Winchester, Bishop of, 629

Winkworth, Misses, 580

Wilson, Miss Dorothy, 214

Wister, Mrs., 499

Wollstoncraft, Mary, 466

Wood, Colonel Sir Evelyn, 629, 635, 648, 650

Woolman, John, 619

Workhouses, 286, chapter xi.

Wynne-Finch, Mr., 500

Y

Yates, Mrs. Richard Vaughan, 699, _seq._

Yeo, Professor, 674

Z

Zachly, 244

Zola, 369

Zoophilist, 670, 680, 682

-----

Footnote 1:

With respect to the Letters and Extracts from Letters to myself and to

Miss Elliot, from the late Master of Balliol,—(to be found Vol. I.,

pp. 316, 317, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, and 354),—I beg to record that

I have received the very kind permission of Mr. Jowett’s Executors for

their publication.

Footnote 2:

It is always amusing to me to read the complacent arguments of

despisers of women when they think to prove the inevitable mental

inferiority of my sex by specifying the smaller circumference of

our heads. On this line of logic an elephant should be twice as

wise as a man. But in my case, as it happens, their argument leans

the wrong way, for my head is larger than those of most of my

countrymen,—Doctors included. As measured carefully with proper

instruments by a skilled phrenologist (the late Major Noel) the

dimensions are as follows:—Circumference, twenty-three and a

quarter inches; greatest height from external orifice of ear to

summit of crown, 6²⁄₈ inches. On the other hand dear Mrs.

Somerville’s little head, which held three times as much as mine

has ever done, was below the average of that of women. So much for

that argument!

Footnote 3:

The aphorism so often applied to little girls, that “it is better to

be good than pretty,” may, with greater hope of success, be applied to

family names; but I fear mine is neither imposing nor sonorous. I may

say of it (as I remarked to the charming Teresa Doria when she

ridiculed the Swiss for their _mesquin_ names, all ending in “_in_”),

“Everybody cannot have the luck to be able to sign themselves Doria

_nata_ Durazzo!” Nevertheless “Cobbe” is a very old name (Leuricus

Cobbe held lands in Suffolk, _vide_ Domesday), and it is curiously

wide-spread as a word in most Aryan languages, signifying either the

_head_ (literal or metaphorical), or a head-shaped object. I am no

philologist, and I dare say my examples offend against some “law,” and

therefore cannot be admitted; but it is at least odd that we should

find Latin, “_Caput_;” Italian, _Capo_; Spanish, _Cabo_; Saxon, _Cop_;

German, _Kopf_. Then we have, as derivates from the physical head,

_Cape_, _Capstan_, _Cap_, _Cope_, _Copse_ or _Coppice_, _Coping

Stone_, _Copped_, _Cup_, _Cupola_, _Cub_, _Cubicle_, _Kobbold_,

_Gobbo_; and from the metaphorical Head or Chief, _Captain_,

_Capital_, _Capitation_, _Capitulate_, &c. And again, we have a

multitude of names for objects obviously signifying head-shaped,

_e.g._, _Cob-horse_, _Cob-nut_, _Cob-gull_, _Cob-herring_, _Cob-swan_,

_Cob-coal_, _Cob-iron_, _Cob-wall_; a _Cock_ (of hay), according to

Johnson, properly a “_Cop_” of hay; the _Cobb_ (or Headland) at Lyme

Regis, &c., &c.; the Kobbé fiord in Norway, &c.

Footnote 4:

As such things as mythical pedigrees are not _altogether_ unknown in

the world, I beg to say that I have myself noted the above from

Harleian MS. in British Museum 1473 and 1139. Also in the College of

Arms, G. 16, p. 74, and C. 19, p. 104.

Footnote 5:

Wife of Thomas Cobbe’s half-brother.

Footnote 6:

Lady Huntingdon was doubly connected with Thomas Cobbe. She was his

first cousin, daughter of his maternal aunt Selina Countess of

Ferrers, and mother of his sister-in-law, Elizabeth Countess of Moira.

The pictures of Dorothy Levinge, and of her father; of Lady Ferrers;

and of Lord Moira and his wife, all of which hang in the halls at

Newbridge, made me as a child, think of them as familiar people.

Unfortunately the portrait of chief interest, that of Lady Huntingdon,

is missing in the series.

Footnote 7:

Pronounced “Lock Nay.”

Footnote 8:

Part of the following description of my own and my mother’s school

appeared some years ago in a periodical, now, I believe, extinct.

Footnote 9:

“It is a fact of Consciousness to which all experience bears witness

and which it is the duty of the philosopher to admit and account for,

instead of disguising or mutilating it to suit the demands of a

system, that there are certain truths which when once acquired, no

matter how, it is impossible by any effort of thought to conceive as

reversed or reversible.”—Mansel’s _Metaphysics_, p. 248.

Footnote 10:

We should now say _Altruism_.

Footnote 11:

I am thankful to believe that he would be no longer accorded such a

rank in 1890 as in 1850!

Footnote 12:

Mr. Hutton, whose exceedingly interesting and brilliant _Life of the

Marquess of Wellesley_ (in the “_Rulers of India_” series) includes an

account of the whole campaign, has been so kind as to endeavour to

identify this Frenchman for me, and tells me that in a note to

Wellington’s _Despatches_, Vol. II., p. 323, it is given as _Dupont_;

Wellington speaking of him as commanding a “brigade of infantry.” My

father certainly spoke of him or some other Frenchman as commanding

Scindias’ artillery. Mr. Hutton has also been good enough to refer me

to Grant Duff’s _History of the Mahrattas_, Vol. III., p. 240, with

regard to the number of British troops engaged at Assaye. He (Mr.

Grant Duff) says the handful of British troops did not exceed 4,500 as

my father also estimated them.

Footnote 13:

The mistake recorded in these little verses was made by a daughter of

Louis Philippe when visiting her uncle, the Grand Duke of Lucca. The

incident was narrated to me by the sculpturess, Mdlle. Felicie

Fauveau, attendant on the Duchesse de Berri.

Footnote 14:

See General Sleeman’s _India_.

Footnote 15:

The Proteus Anguinus.

Footnote 16:

Miss Elliot and I had begun it a year sooner, as stated above.

Footnote 17:

Mr. Jowett referred to Dean Elliot’s purchases of some fine old

pictures.

Footnote 18:

“Then, soul of my soul! I shall meet thee again,

And with God be the rest!”

Footnote 19:

This refers to an afternoon party we gave to witness poor Mr. Bishop’s

interesting thought-reading performances. He was wonderfully

successful throughout, and the company, which consisted of about 30

clever men and women, were unanimous in applauding his art, of

whatever nature it may have been. I may add that after my guests were

departed, when I took out my cheque-book and begged to know his fee,

Mr. Bishop positively refused to accept any remuneration whatever for

the charming entertainment he had given us. The tragic circumstances

of the death of this unhappy young man will be remembered. He either

died, or fell into a deathlike trance, at a supper party in New York,

in 1889; and within _four hours_ of his real (or apparent) decease,

three medical men who had been supping with him, dissected his brain.

One doctor who conducted this autopsy alleged that Bishop had been

extremely anxious that his brain should be examined _post mortem_, but

his mother asserted on the contrary, that he had a peculiar horror of

dissection, and had left directions that no _post mortem_ should be

held on his remains. It was also stated that he had a card in his

pocket warning those who might find him at any time in a trance, to

beware of burying him before signs of dissolution should be visible.

In a leading article on the subject in the _Liverpool Daily Post_, May

21st, 1889, it is stated that by the laws of the United States “it is

distinctly enacted that no dissection shall take place without the

fiat of the coroner, or at the request of the relatives of the

deceased; so that some explanation of the anxiety which induced so

manifest a breach of both laws and custom is eminently desirable. A

second examination of the body at the instance of the coroner, has

revealed the fact that all the organs were in a healthy state, and

that it was impossible to ascribe death to any specific cause or to

say whether Mr. Bishop were alive or dead at the time of the first

autopsy.” Both wife and mother believed he was “murdered;” and ordered

that word to be engraved on his coffin. His mother had herself

experienced a cataleptic trance of six days’ duration, during the

whole of which she was fully conscious. The three doctors were

proceeded against by her and the widow, and were put under bonds of

£500 each; but, as the experts alleged that it was impossible to

decide the cause of death, the case eventually dropped. Whether it

were one of “_Human Vivisection_” or not, can never now be known. If

the three physicians who performed the autopsy on Mr. Bishop did not

commit a murder of appalling barbarity on the helpless companion of

their supper-table, they certainly _risked_ incurring that guilt with

unparalleled levity and callousness.

Footnote 20:

A statue of Miss Hosmer exhibited in London, purchased by an American

gentleman for £1,000.

Footnote 21:

Not quite so good a story as that of another American child who,

having been naughty and punished, was sent up to her room by her

mother and told to ask for forgiveness. On returning downstairs the

mother asked her whether she had done as she had directed? “Oh yes!

Mama,” answered the child, “_And God said to me, Pray don’t mention

it, Miss Perkins!_”

Footnote 22:

See Spenser—The “West” District of London was the one which elected

Miss Garrett for the School Board.

Footnote 23:

Sir W. Harcourt interrupted Mr. Russell when speaking of Vivisections

before students, by the assertion—

“Under the Act demonstrations were forbidden.”—_Times_, April 5th,

1883.

In the Act in question—39 & 40 Vict., c. 77, Clause 3, Sect. 1—are

these words, “Experiments _may be performed_ ... by a person giving

illustrations of lectures,” &c., &c. By the Returns issued from Sir W.

Harcourt’s own (Home) Office in the previous year, _sixteen_ persons

had been registered as holding certificates permitting experiments in

illustration of lectures. It seems to me a shocking feature of modern

politics that an outrageous falsehood—or must we call it mistake?—of

this kind is allowed to serve its purpose at the moment but the author

never apologizes for it afterwards.

Footnote 24:

Most of the following letters were lent by me to Mr. Walrond when he

was preparing the biography of Dean Stanley, and in returning them he

said that he had kept copies of them, and meant to include them in his

book. The present Editor not having used them, I feel myself at

liberty to print them here.

Footnote 25:

We had many good stories floating about in Rome at that time and he

was always ready to enjoy them, but one, I think, told me by the

painter Penry Williams, would not have tickled him as it did us

heretics. The Pope, it seems, offered one of his Cardinals (whose

reputation was far from immaculate) a pinch of snuff. The Cardinal

replied more facetiously than respectfully “_Non ho questo vizio,

Santo Padre_.” Pius IX. observed quietly, snapping his snuffbox, “_Se

vizio fosse, l’avreste_” (If it had been a vice you would have had

it)!

Footnote 26:

Curiously enough I have had occasion to repeat this remark this Spring

(1894) in a controversy in the columns of the _Catholic Times_.

Footnote 27:

I had talked to him of our Ragged School at Bristol.

Footnote 28:

When our Bill was debated in Parliament in 1883, Mr. Gladstone left

us, totally unaided, to the mercies (not tender) of Sir William

Harcourt, who interrupted Mr. George Russell’s speech in support of

our Bill by the remark that the demonstrations to students, to which

he referred, were forbidden by the Vivisection Act. _Sixteen_

certificates granting permission for the performance of such

experiments in demonstration to students passed through his own office

that year!

Footnote 29:

This opinion of the great _Philanthropist_ deserves to be remembered

with those of the many thinkers who have reached the same conclusion

from other sides.

Footnote 30:

The General Secretary, then, and, I am happy to say, still,—of the

Victoria Street Society.

Footnote 31:

The lines to which Lord Shaftesbury refers—“Best in the Lord” (since

included in many collections) begin with the words:

“God draws a cloud over each gleaming morn.

Wouldst thou ask, why?

It is because all noblest things are born

In agony.

Only upon some Cross of pain or woe

God’s Son may lie.

Each soul redeemed from self and sin must know

Its Calvary.”

Lord Shaftesbury entirely understood the point of view from which I

regarded that sacred spot.

Footnote 32:

Here is what Dr. Russell Reynolds, F.R.S., said in 1881 in an address

to the Medical Society of University College:—“There is meddling and

muddling of a most disreputable sort, and the patients” (he is

speaking of women) “grow sick of it, and give it all up and get well;

or they go from bad to worse.”... “Physicians have coined names for

trifling maladies, if they have not invented them, and have set

fashions of disease. They have treated or maltreated their patients by

endless examinations, applications, and the like, and this sometimes

for months, sometimes for years, and then, when by some accident the

patient has been removed from their care, she has become quite well

and there has been no more need for caustic,” &c., &c.

And here is what Dr. Clifford Allbut said in the Gulstonian Lecture

for 1884 at the Royal College of Physicians. After admitting that

women feel more pain than men, he mentioned the “_morbid chains_,” the

“_mental abasement_,” into which fall “the flock of women who lie

under the wand of the Gynæcologist” (specialist of women’s diseases);

“the women who are _caged up in London back drawing-rooms_, and

visited almost daily; their brave and active spirits broken under a

_false_ (!!) _belief in the presence of a secret and over-mastering

local malady_; and the best years of their lives honoured only by a

distressful victory over pain.” (Italics mine.)—_Medical Press_, March

19th, 1884.

Footnote 33:

The certificate (A) dispensing with Anæsthetics was doubtless inserted

after Lord Shaftesbury saw the Bill.

Footnote 34:

Mr. Cartwright, speaking in the House of Commons, April 4th, 1883, in

reply to Mr. R. T. Reid, said: “The hon. member should have said

something about the prosecution of Dr. Ferrier for having evaded the

Act. He does not do that. He has wisely given the go-by to it, for

that prosecution lamentably failed, altogether broke down. The charge

brought against Dr. Ferrier was that he operated without a licence and

infringed the law by doing those things to which the hon. and learned

member referred; but the charge was not supported by one tittle of

evidence.”

Footnote 35:

Many persons have supposed that I am still concerned with the

management of that journal; but, except as an occasional contributor,

such is not the case. The credit of the editorship for the last ten

years (which I consider to be great) rests entirely with Mr. Bryan.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES

1. P. 169, changed “but really achieved” to “but rarely achieved”.

2. P. 277, changed “straight on end” to “straight on in”.

3. P. 319, changed “bought forth fruit” to “brought forth fruit”.

4. P. 354, changed “thoughts, I don’t” to “thoughts, I won’t”.

5. Corrected the issues identified in the Errata.

6. Silently corrected obvious typographical errors and variations in

spelling.

7. Retained archaic, non-standard, and uncertain spellings as printed.

8. Re-indexed foot-notes using numbers and collected together at the

end of the last chapter.

9. Enclosed italics font in _underscores_.

Life of Frances Power Cobbe, as told by herself with additions by the author, and introduction by Blanche Atkinson · 第 52 / 52 段