FOOTNOTE:

[1] Another old word occasionally used in the sense of an index is

"pye." Sir T. Duffus Hardy, in some observations on the derivation of

the word "Pye-Book" (which most probably comes from the Latin

_pica_), remarks that the earliest use he had noted of pye in this

sense is dated 1547--"a Pye of all the names of such Balives as been

to accompte pro anno regni regis Edwardi Sexti primo."

INDEX LIBRORUM PROHIBITORUM, the title of the official list of those

books which on doctrinal or moral grounds the Roman Catholic Church

authoritatively forbids the members of her communion to read or to

possess, irrespective of works forbidden by the general rules on the

subject. Most governments, whether civil or ecclesiastical, have at all

times in one way or another acted on the general principle that some

control may and ought to be exercised over the literature circulated

among those under their jurisdiction. If we set aside the heretical

books condemned by the early councils, the earliest known instance of a

list of proscribed books being issued with the authority of a bishop of

Rome is the _Notitia librorum apocryphorum qui non recipiuntur_, the

first redaction of which, by Pope Gelasius (494), was subsequently

amplified on several occasions. The document is for the most part an

enumeration of such apocryphal works as by their titles might be

supposed to be part of Holy Scripture (the "Acts" of Philip, Thomas and

Peter, and the Gospels of Thaddaeus, Matthias, Peter, James the Less and

others).[1] Subsequent pontiffs continued to exhort the episcopate and

the whole body of the faithful to be on their guard against heretical

writings, whether old or new; and one of the functions of the

Inquisition when it was established was to exercise a rigid censorship

over books put in circulation. The majority of the condemnations were at

that time of a specially theological character. With the discovery of

the art of printing, and the wide and cheap diffusion of all sorts of

books which ensued, the need for new precautions against heresy and

immorality in literature made itself felt, and more than one pope

(Sixtus IV. in 1479 and Alexander VI. in 1501) gave special directions

to the archbishops of Cologne, Mainz, Trier and Magdeburg regarding the

growing abuses of the printing press; in 1515 the Lateran council

formulated the decree _De Impressione Librorum_, which required that no

work should be printed without previous examination by the proper

ecclesiastical authority, the penalty of unlicensed printing being

excommunication of the culprit, and confiscation and destruction of the

books. The council of Trent in its fourth session, 8th April 1546,

forbade the sale or possession of any anonymous religious book which had

not previously been seen and approved by the ordinary; in the same year

the university of Louvain, at the command of Charles V., prepared an

"Index" of pernicious and forbidden books, a second edition of which

appeared in 1550. In 1557, and again in 1559, Pope Paul IV., through the

Inquisition at Rome, published what may be regarded as the first Roman

Index in the modern ecclesiastical use of that term (_Index auctorum et

librorum qui tanquam haeretici aut suspecti aut perversi ab Officio S.

R. Inquisitionis reprobantur et in universa Christiana republica

interdicuntur_). In this we find the three classes which were to be

maintained in the Trent Index: authors condemned with all their

writings; prohibited books, the authors of which are known; pernicious

books by anonymous authors. An excessively severe general condemnation

was applied to all anonymous books published since 1519; and a list of

sixty-two printers of heretical books was appended. This excessive

rigour was mitigated in 1561. At the 18th session of the council of

Trent (26th February 1562), in consideration of the great increase in

the number of suspect and pernicious books, and also of the inefficacy

of the many previous "censures" which had proceeded from the provinces

and from Rome itself, eighteen fathers with a certain number of

theologians were appointed to inquire into these "censures," and to

consider what ought to be done in the circumstances. At the 25th session

(4th December 1563) this committee of the council was reported to have

completed its work, but as the subject did not seem (on account of the

great number and variety of the books) to admit of being properly

discussed by the council, the result of its labours was handed over to

the pope (Pius IV.) to deal with as he should think proper. In the

following March accordingly were published, with papal approval, the

_Index librorum prohibitorum_, which continued to be reprinted and

brought down to date, and the "Ten Rules" which, supplemented and

explained by Clement VIII., Sixtus V., Alexander VII., and finally by

Benedict XIV. (10th July 1753), regulated the matter until the

pontificate of Leo XIII. The business of condemning pernicious books and

of correcting the Index to date has been since the time of Pope Sixtus

V. in the hands of the "Congregation of the Index," which consists of

several cardinals, one of whom is the prefect, and more or less numerous

"consultors" and "examiners of books." An attempt has been made to

publish separately the _Index Librorum Expurgandorum or Expurgatorius_,

a catalogue of the works which may be read after the deletion or

amending of specified passages; but this was soon abandoned.

With the alteration of social conditions, however, the Rules of Trent

ceased to be entirely applicable. Their application to publications

which had no concern with morals or religion was no longer conceivable;

and, finally, the penalties called for modification. Already, at the

Vatican Council, several bishops had submitted requests for a reform of

the Index, but the Council was not able to deal with the question. The

reform was accomplished by Leo XIII., who, on the 25th of January 1897,

published the constitution _Officiorum_, in 49 articles. In this

constitution, although the writings of heretics in support of heresy are

condemned as before (No. 1), those of their books which contain nothing

against Catholic doctrine or which treat other subjects are permitted

(Nos. 2-3). Editions of the text of the Scriptures are permitted for

purposes of study; translations of the Bible into the vulgar tongue have

to be approved, while those published by non-Catholics are permitted for

the use of scholars (Nos. 5-8). Obscene books are forbidden; the

classics, however, are authorized for educational purposes (Nos. 9-10).

Articles 11-14 forbid books which outrage God and sacred things, books

which propagate magic and superstition, and books which are pernicious

to society. The ecclesiastical laws relating to sacred images, to

indulgences, and to liturgical books and books of devotion are

maintained (Nos. 15-20). Articles 21-22 condemn immoral and irreligious

newspapers, and forbid writers to contribute to them. Articles 23-26

deal with permissions to read prohibited books; these are given by the

bishop in particular cases, and in the ordinary course by the

Congregation of the Index. In the second part of the constitution the

pope deals with the censorship of books. After indicating the official

publications for which the authorization of the divers Roman

congregations is required, he goes on to say that the others are

amenable to the ordinary of the editor and, in the case of regulars, to

their superior (Nos. 30-37). The examination of the books is entrusted

to censors, who have to study them without prejudice; if their report is

favourable, the bishop gives the _imprimatur_ (Nos. 38-40). All books

concerned with the religious sciences and with ethics are submitted to

preliminary censorship, and in addition to this ecclesiastics have to

obtain a personal authorization for all their books and for the

acceptance of the editorship of a periodical (Nos. 41-42). The penalty

of excommunication _ipso facto_ is only maintained for reading books

written by heretics or apostates in defence of heresy, or books

condemned by name under pain of excommunication by pontifical letters

(not by decrees of the Index). By the same constitution Leo XIII.

ordered the revision of the catalogue of the Index. The new Index, which

omits works anterior to 1600 as well as a great number of others

included in the old catalogue, appeared in 1900. The encyclical

_Pascendi_ of Pius X. (8th September 1907) made it obligatory for

periodicals amenable to the ecclesiastical authority to be submitted to

a censor, who subsequently makes useful observations. The legislation of

Leo XIII. resulted in the better observance of the rules for the

publication of books, but apparently did not modify the practice as

regards the reading of prohibited books. It is to be regretted that the

catalogue does not discriminate among the prohibited works according to

the motive of their condemnation and the danger ascribed to reading

them. The tendency of the practice among Catholics at large is to reduce

these condemnations to the proportions of the moral law.

See H. Reusch, _Der Index der verbotenen Bücher_ (Bonn, 1883); A.

Arndt, _De Libris prohibitis commentarii_ (Ratisbon, 1895); A.

Boudinhon, _La Nouvelle Législation de l'index_ (Paris, 1899); J.

Hilgers, _Der Index der verbotenen Bücher_ (Freiburg in B., 1904); A.

Vermeersch, _De prohibitione et censura librorum_ (Tournai, 1907); T.

Hurley, _Commentary on the Present Index Legislation_ (Dublin, 1908).

(A. Bo.*)

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Independence, Declaration of" to "Indo-European Languages" Volume 14, Slice 4 · 第 6 / 44 题