Early Day Justice.[2]

[Footnote 2: _From the Chicago Rambler_.]

Those were troublesome times, indeed. All wool justice in the courts was

impossible. The vigilance committee, or Salvation Army as it called

itself, didn't make much fuss about it, but we all knew that the best

citizens belonged to it and were in good standing.

It was in those days when young Stewart was short-handed for a sheep

herder, and had to take up with a sullen, hairy vagrant, called by the

other boys “Esau.” Esau hadn't been on the ranch a week before he made

trouble with the proprietor and got the red-hot blessing from Stewart he

deserved.

Then Esau got madder and sulked away down the valley among the little sage

brush hummocks and white alkali waste land to nurse his wrath. When

Stewart drove into the corral at night, from town, Esau raised up from

behind an old sheep dip tank, and without a word except what may have

growled around in his black heart, he raised a leveled Spencer and shot

his young employer dead.

That was the tragedy of the week only. Others had occurred before and

others would probably occur again. It was getting too prevalent for

comfort. So, as soon as a quick cayuse and a boy could get down into

town, the news spread and the authorities began in the routine manner to

set the old legal mill to running. Someone had to go down to “The Tivoli”

and find the prosecuting attorney, then a messenger had to go to “The

Alhambra” for the justice of the peace. The prosecuting attorney was

“full” and the judge had just drawn one card to complete a straight flush,

and had succeeded.

In the meantime the Salvation Army was fully half way to Clugston's ranch.

They had started out, as they said, “to see that Esau didn't get away.”

They were going out there to see that Esau was brought into town.

[Illustration: THE SALVATION ARMY.]

What happened after they got there I only know from hearsay, for I was not

a member of the Salvation Army at that time. But I got it from one of

those present, that they found Esau down in the sage brush on the bottoms

that lie between the abrupt corner of Sheep Mountain and the Little

Laramie River. They captured him, but he died soon after, as it was told

me, from the effects of opium taken with suicidal intent. I remember

seeing Esau the next morning and I thought there were signs of ropium, as

there was a purple streak around the neck of deceased, together with other

external phenomena not peculiar to opium.

But the great difficulty with the Salvation Army was that it didn't want

to bring Esau into town. A long, cold night ride with a person in Esau's

condition was disagreeable. Twenty miles of lonely road with a deceased

murderer in the bottom of the wagon is depressing. Those of my readers who

have tried it will agree with me that it is not calculated to promote

hilarity. So the Salvation Army stopped at Whatley's ranch to get warm,

hoping that someone would steal the remains and elope with them. They

stayed some time and managed to “give away” the fact that there was a

reward of $5,000 out for Esau, dead or alive. The Salvation Army even went

so far as to betray a great deal of hilarity over the easy way it had

nailed the reward, or would as soon as said remains were delivered up and

identified.

Mr. Whatley thought that the Salvation Army was having a kind of walkaway,

so he slipped out at the back door of the ranch, put Esau into his own

wagon and drove away to town. Remember, this is the way it was told to me.

Mr. Whatley hadn't gone more than half a mile when he heard the wild and

disappointed yells of the Salvation Army. He put the buckskin on the backs

of his horses without mercy, driven on by the enraged shouts and yells of

his infuriated pursuers. He reached town about midnight, and his pursuers

disappeared. But what was he to do with Esau?

He drove around all over town, trying to find the official who signed for

the deceased. Mr. Whatley went from house to house like a vegetable man,

seeking sadly for the party who would give him a $5,000 check for Esau.

Nothing could be more depressing than to wake up one man after another out

of a sound sleep and invite him to come out to the buggy and identify the

remains. One man went out and looked at him. He said he didn't know how

others felt about it, but he allowed that anybody who would pay $5,000 for

such a remains as Esau's could not have very good taste.

Gradually it crept through Mr. Whatley's wool that the Salvation Army had

been working him, so he left Esau at the engine house and went home. On

his ranch he nailed up a large board on which had been painted in antique

characters with a paddle and tar the following stanzas:

Vigilance Committees, Salvation Armies, Morgues, or young physicians who

may have deceased people on their hands, are requested to refrain from

conferring them on to the undersigned.

People who contemplate shuffling off their own or other people's mortal

coils, will please not do so on these grounds.

The Salvation Army of the Rocky Mountains is especially hereby warned to

keep off the grass!

James Whatley.

The Indian Orator.

I like to read of the Indian orator in the old school books. Most everyone

does. It is generally remarkable that the American Demosthenes, so far,

has dwelt in the tepee, and lived on the debris of the deer and the

buffalo. I mean to say that the school readers have impressed us with the

great magnetism of the crude warrior who dwelt in the wilderness and ate

his game, feathers and all, while he studied the art of swaying the

audience by his oratorical powers.

I am inclined to think that Black Hawk and Logan must have been fortunate

in securing mighty able private secretaries, or that they stood in with

the stenographers of their day. At least, the Blue Juniata warriors of our

time, from Little Crow, Red Iron, Standing Buffalo, Hole-in-the-Day and

Sitting Bull, to Victoria, Colorow, Douglas, Persume, Captain Jack and

Shavano, seem to do better as lobbyists than they do as orators. They may

be keen, logical and shrewd, but they are not eloquent. In some minds,

Black Hawk will ever appear as the Patrick Henry of his people; but I

prefer to honor his unknown, unhonored and unsung amanuensis. Think what a

godsend such a man would have been to Senator Tabor.

The Indian orator of to-day is not scholarly and grand. He is soiled,

ignorant and sedentary in his habits. An orator ought to take care of his

health. He cannot overload his stomach and make a bronze Daniel Webster of

himself. He cannot eat a raw buffalo for breakfast and at once attack the

question of tariff for revenue only. His brain is not clear enough. He

cannot digest the mammalia of North America and seek out the delicate

intricacies of the financial problem at the same time. All scientists and

physiologists will readily see why this is true.

It is quite popular to say that the modern Indian has seen too much of

civilization. This may be true. Anyhow, civilization has seen too much of

him. I hope the day will never come when the pale face and the White

Father will have to stay on their reservation, whether the red man does or

not.

Indian eloquence, toned down by the mellow haze of a hundred years, sounds

very well, but the clarion voice of the red orator has died away. The

stony figure, the eagle eye, the matchless presence, have all ceased to

palpitate.

He does not say: “I am an aged hemlock. I am dead at the top. The forest

is filled with the ghosts of my people. I hear their moans on the night

winds and in the sighing pines.” He does not talk in the blank verse of a

century ago. He uses a good many blanks, but it is not blank verse. Even

the Indian's friend would admit that it was not blank verse. Perhaps it

might be called blankety verse.

Once he pleaded for the land of his fathers. Now he howls for grub, guns

and fixed ammunition.

I tried to interview a big Crow chief once. I had heard some Sioux, and

learned a few irrelevant and disconnected Ute phrases. I connected these

with some Spanish terms and hoped to get a reply, and keep up a kind of

running conversation that might mislead a friend who was with me, into the

belief that I was as familiar with the Indian tongue as with my own. I

began conversing with him in my polyglot manner. I did not get a reply. I

conversed with him some more in a desultory way, for I had heard that he

was a great orator in his tribe, and I wanted to get his views on national

affairs. Still he was silent. He would not even answer me. I got hostile

and used some badly damaged Spanish on him. Then I used some sprained and

dislocated German on him, but he didn't seem to wot whereof I spoke.

Then my friend, with all the assurance of a fresh young manhood, began to

talk with the great warrior in the English language, and incidentally

asked him about a new Indian agent, who had the name of being a bogus

Christian with an eye to the main chance.

My friend talked very loud, with the idea that the chieftain could

understand any language if spoken so that you could hear it in the next

Territory. At the mention of the Indian agent's name, the Crow statesman

brightened up and made a remark. He simply said: “Ugh! too much God and no

flour.”

You Heah Me, Sah!

Col. Visscher, of Denver, who is delivering his lecture, “Sixty Minutes in

the War,” tells a good story on himself of an episode, or something of

that nature, that occurred to him in the days when he was the amanuensis

of George D. Prentice.

Visscher, in those days, was a fair-haired young man, with pale blue eyes,

and destitute of that wealth of brow and superficial area of polished dome

which he now exhibits on the rostrum. He was learning the lesson of life

then, and every now and then he would bump up against an octagonal mass of

cold-pressed truth of the never-dying variety that seemed to kind of stun

and concuss him.

One day Mr. Visscher wandered into a prominent hotel in Louisville, and,

observing with surprise and pleasure that “boiled lobster” was one of the

delicacies on the bill of fare, he ordered one.

He never had seen lobster, and a rare treat seemed to be in store for him.

He breathed in what atmosphere there was in the dining-room, and waited

for his bird. At last it was brought in. Mr. Visscher took one hasty look

at the great scarlet mass of voluptuous limbs and oceanic nippers, and

sighed. The lobster was as large as a door mat, and had a very angry and

inflamed appearance. Visscher ordered in a powerful cocktail to give him

courage, and then he tried to carve off some of the breast.

The lobster is honery even in death. He is eccentric and trifling. Those

who know him best are the first to evade him and shun him. Visscher had

failed to straddle the wish bone with his fork properly, and the talented

bird of the deep rolling sea slipped out of the platter, waved itself

across the horizon twice, and buried itself in the bosom of the eminent

and talented young man. The eminent and talented young man took it in his

napkin, put it carefully on the table, and went away.

As he passed out, the head waiter said:

“Mr. Visscher, was there anything the matter with your lobster?”

Visscher is a full-blooded Kentuckian, and answered in the courteous

dialect of the blue-grass country.

“Anything the matter with my lobster, sah? No, sah. The lobster is very

vigorous, sah. If you had asked me how I was, sah, I should have answered

you very differently, sah. I am not well at all, sah. If I were as well,

and as ruddy, and as active as that lobster, sah, I would live forever,

sah. You heah me, sah?

“Why, of course, I am not familiar with the habits of the lobster, sah,

and do not know how to kearve the bosom of the bloomin' peri of the summer

sea, but that's no reason why the inflamed reptile should get up on his

hind feet and nestle up to me, sah, in that earnest and forthwith manner,

sah.

“I love dumb beasts, sah, and they love me, sah; but when they are dead,

sah, and I undertake to kearve them, sah, I desiah, sah, that they should

remain as the undertakah left them, sah. You doubtless heah me, sah!”

Plato.

Plato was a Greek philosopher who flourished about 426 B.C., and kept on

flourishing for eighty-one years after that, when he suddenly ceased do so.

He early took to poetry, but when he found that his poems were rejected by

the Greek papers, he ceased writing poetry and went into the philosophy

business. At that time Greece had no regular philosopher, and so Plato

soon got all he could do.

Plato was a pupil of Socrates, who was himself no slouch of a

philosopher. Many and many a day did Socrates take his little class of

kindergarten philosophers up the shady banks of the Ilissus, and sit all

day discoursing to his pupils on deep and difficult doctrines, while his

unsandaled feet were bathed in the genial tide. Many happy hours were

thus spent. Socrates would take his dinner or tell some wonderful tale

to his class, whereby he would win their dinner himself. Then in the

deep Athenian shade, with his bare, Gothic feet in the clear, calm

waters of the Ilissus, he would eat the Grecian doughnut of his pupils,

and while he spoke in poetic terms of his belief, he would dig his heel

in the mud and heave a heart-broken sigh.

Such was Socrates, the great teacher. He got a small salary, and went

barefoot till after Thanksgiving. He was a great tutor, and boarded

around, teaching in the open air while the mosquitos bit his bare feet.

No tutor ever tuted with a more unselfish purpose or a smaller salary.

Plato maintained, among other things, that evil is connected with matter,

and aside from matter we do not find evil existing. That is true. At

least, such evil as we might find apart from matter would be outside the

jurisdiction of a police court. I think Plato was correct. Evil and

matter are inseparable. That's what's the matter.

It is quite common for us to say that virtue is its own reward. Plato

held that, while it was better to be virtuous as a matter of economy and

ultimate peace than not to be virtuous at all, he believed in being

virtuous for a higher reason. Probably it was notoriety. He would rather

be right than be president. He believed in being good just for the

excitement of it, and the notice it would attract, and not because it

paid. Plato was a great virtuoso.

Socrates would have been called a crank if he had lived in our day and

age, and if Plato were to go into London or New York and talk of

organizing a society for the encouragement of virtue among adult male

taxpayers he would have a lonesome time of it. Be virtuous and you will

be happy was a favorite motto with Plato. The legend is still quoted by

those who love to ransack the dead past.

[Illustration: NEPTUNE TAKING A RIDE.]

Pluto was quite another party, and some get him mixed up with Plato.

They were not related in any way, Pluto being a son of Saturn and Rhea,

who flourished at about the same time as Plato. Pluto was a brother of

Jupiter and Neptune, and when the estate of Saturn was wound up, Jupiter

wanted the earth, and he got it. Neptune wanted the codfish conservatory

and the mermaid's home, so he took the deep, deep sea, and even yet he

rides around in a gold spangled stone boat on the pale green billows of

the summer sea, jabbing a pickerel ever and anon with a three pronged

fork. He leads a gay life, going to picnics with the mermaids in their

coral caves, or attending their full evening dress parties, clad in a

trident and a fall beard. He loves the sea, the lone, blue sea, and

those who have seen him turning handsprings on a sponge lawn, or riding

in his water-tight chariot with his feet over the dash-board, beside a

slim young mermaid with Paris green hair, and dressed in a

tight-fitting, low-neck dorsal fin, say he is a lively old party.

But Pluto was different. He stood around till the estate was all closed

up, and it looked as though he had got left. Just then the administrator

says: “Why, here's Pluto. He is going to come out of the little end of

the horn. He will have to hustle for himself,” Pluto resented this and

clinched with the administrator. They fought till each had a watch pocket

on the brow and an Irish sunset symphony in green under the eye, while

Jupiter and Neptune stood by and encouraged the fight. Jupiter rather

took sides with his brother, and Neptune stood in with the administrator.

In the midst of the confusion Jupiter speaks up and says: “Swat him under

the ear, Pluto.” Whereupon Neptune says to the administrator. “Give

him--hail.” The administrator paused and said that was a good suggestion.

He would do so. And so he forgave Pluto and gave him--sheol.

The Expensive Word.

Much that is annoying in this life is occasioned by the use of a high

priced word where a cheaper one would do. In these days of failure,

shortage at both ends and financial stringency generally, I often wonder

that some people should go on, day after day, using just as extravagant

language as they did during the flush times. When I get hard up the first

thing I do is to economize in my expressions in every day conversation. If

there is a marked stringency in business, I lay aside first, my French,

then my Latin, and finally my German. Should the times become greatly

depressed and failures and assignments become frequent, I begin to lop off

the large words in my own language, beginning with “incomprehensibility,”

“unconstitutionally,” etc., etc.

Julius Caesar's motto used to be, “Avoid an unusual word as you would a

rock at sea,” and Jule was right about it, too. Large and unusual words,

especially in the mouths of ignorant people, are worse than “Rough on

Rats” in a boarding-house pie.

Years ago there used to be a pompous cuss in southern Wisconsin, who was a

self-made man. Extremely so. Those who used to hear him assert again and

again that he was a self-made man always felt renewed confidence in the

Creator.

He rose one evening in a political meeting, and swelling out his bosom, as

his eagle eye rested on the chairman, he said:

“Mr. Cheerman! I move you that the cheer do appoint a committee of three

to attend to the matter under discussion, and that sayed committee be

clothed by the cheer with ominiscient and omnipotent powers.”

The motion was duly seconded and the cheerman said he guessed that it

wouldn't be necessary to put it to a vote.

“I guess it will be all right, Mr. Pinkham. I guess there'll be no

declivity to that.”

And so the committee was appointed and clothed with omniscient and

omnipotent powers, there being no declivity to it.

We had a self-made lawyer at one time in the northern part of the State

who would rather find a seventy-five cent word and use it in a speech

where it did not belong than to eat a good square meal. He was more fatal

to the King's English than O'Dynamite Rossa. One day he was telling how

methodical one of the county officials was.

“Why,” said he, “I never saw a man do so much and do it so easy. But the

secret of it is plain enough. You see, he has a regular rotunda of

business every day.”

If he meant anything, I suppose he meant a routine of business, but a man

would have to be a mind reader to follow him some days when he had about

six fingers of cough medicine aboard and began to paw around in the dark

and musty garret of his memory for moth-eaten words that didn't mean

anything.

A neighbor of mine went to Washington during the Guiteau trial and has

been telling us about it ever since. He is one of those people who don't

want to be close and stingy about what they know. He likes to go through

life shedding information right and left. He likes to get a crowd around

him and then tell how he was in Washington at the time of the “post

mortise examination.” “Boys, you may talk all your a mind to, but the

greatest thing I saw in Washington,” said he, “was Dr. Mary Walker on the

street every morning riding one of these philosophers.”

[Illustration: HE PAINTED THE FENCE GREEN.]

He painted the top of his fence green, last year, so it would “kind of

combinate with his blinds.”

If he would make his big words “combinate” with what he means a little

better, he would not attract so much attention. But he don't care. He

hates to see a big, fat word loafing around with nothing to do, so he

throws one in occasionally for exercise, I guess.

In the Minnesota legislature, in 1867, they had under discussion a bill to

increase the per diem of members from three dollars to five dollars. A

member of the lower house, who voted for the measure, was hauled over the

coals by one of his constituents and charged with corruption in no

unmeasured terms. To all this the legislator calmly answered that when he

got down to the capital and found out the awful price of board, he

concluded that his “per diadem” ought to be increased, and so he supported

the measure. Then the belligerent constituent said:

“I beg your pardon and acquit you of all charges of corruption, for a

legislator who does not know the difference between a crown of glory and

the price of a day's work is too big a blankety blanked fool to be

convicted of an intentional wrong.”

Petticoats at the Polls.

There have been many reasons given, first and last, why women should not

vote, but I desire to say, in the full light of a ripe experience, that

some of them are fallacious. I refer more particularly to the argument

that it will degrade women to go to the polls and vote like a little man.

While I am not and have never been a howler for female suffrage, I must

admit that it is much more of a success than prohibition and speculative

science.

My wife voted eight years with my full knowledge and consent, and to-day I

cannot see but that she is as docile and as tractable as when she won my

trusting heart.

Now those who know me best will admit that I am not a ladies' man, and,

therefore, what I may say here is not said to secure favor and grateful

smiles. I am not attractive and I am not in politics. I believe that I am

homelier this winter than usual. There are reasons why I believe that what

I may say on this subject will be sincere and not sensational or selfish.

It has been urged that good women do not generally exercise the right of

suffrage, when they have the opportunity, and that only those whose social

record has been tarnished a good deal go to the polls. This is not true.

It is the truth that a good full vote always shows a list of the best

women and the wives of the best men. A bright day makes a better showing

of lady voters than a bad one, and the weather makes a more perceptible

difference in the female vote than the male, but when things are exciting

and the battle is red-hot, and the tocsin of war sounds anon, the wife and

mother puts on her armor and her sealskin sacque and knocks things

cross-eyed.

It is generally supposed that the female voter is a pantaloonatic, a half

horse, half alligator kind of woman, who looks like Dr. Mary Walker and

has the appearance of one who has risen hastily in the night at the alarm

of fire and dressed herself partially in her own garments and partially in

her husband's. This is a popular error. In Wyoming, where female suffrage

has raged for years, you meet quiet, courteous and gallant gentlemen, and

fair, quiet, sensible women at the polls, where there isn't a loud or

profane word, and where it is an infinitely more proper place to send a

young lady unescorted than to the postoffice in any city in the Union. You

can readily see why this is so. The men about the polls are always

candidates and their friends. That is the reason that neither party can

afford to show the slightest rudeness toward a voter. The man who on

Wednesday would tell her to go and soak her head, perhaps, would stand

bareheaded to let her pass on Tuesday. While she holds a smashed ballot

shoved under the palm of her gray kid glove she may walk over the

candidate's prostrate form with impunity and her overshoes if she chooses

to.

Weeks and months before election in Wyoming, the party with the longest

purse subsidizes the most livery stables and carriages. Then, on the

eventful day, every conveyance available is decorated with a political

placard and driven by a polite young man who is instructed to improve the

time. Thus every woman in Wyoming has a chance to ride once a year, at

least. Lately, however, many prefer to walk to the polls, and they go in

pairs, trios and quartettes, voting their little sentiments and calmly

returning to their cookies and crazy quilts as though politics didn't jar

their mental poise a minute.

It is possible, and even probable, that a man and his wife may disagree on

politics as they might on religion. The husband may believe in Andrew

Jackson and a relentless hell, while his wife may be a stalwart and rather

liberal on the question of eternal punishment. If the husband manages his

wife as he would a clothes-wringer, and turns her through life by a crank,

he will, no doubt, work her politically; but if she has her own ideas

about things, she will naturally act upon them, while the man who is

henpecked in other matters till he can't see out of his eyes, will be

henpecked, no doubt, in the matter of national and local politics.

These are a few facts about the actual workings of female suffrage, and I

do not tackle the great question of the ultimate results upon the

political machinery if woman suffrage were to become general. I do not

pretend to say as to that. I know a great deal, but I do not know that.

There are millions of women, no doubt who are better qualified to vote,

and yet cannot, than millions of alleged men who do vote; but no one can

tell now what the ultimate effect of a change might be.

So far as Wyoming is concerned, the Territory is prosperous and happy. I

see, also, that a murderer was hung by process of law there the other day.

That looks like the onward march of reform, whether female suffrage had

anything to do with it or not. And they're going to hang another in March

if the weather is favorable and executive clemency remains dormant, as I

think it will.

All these things look hopeful. We can't tell what the Territory would have

been without female suffrage, but when they begin to hang men by law

instead of by moonlight, the future begins to brighten up. When you have

to get up in the night to hang a man every little while and don't get any

per diem for it, you feel as though you were a good way from home.

The Sedentary Hen.

Though generally cheerful and content with her lot, the hen at times

becomes moody, sullen and taciturn. We are often called upon to notice and

profit by the genial and sunny disposition of the hen, and yet there are

times in her life when she is morose, cynical, and the prey of consuming

melancholy. At such times not only her own companions, but man himself

shuns the hen.

At first she seems to be preoccupied only. She starts and turns pale when

suddenly spoken to. Then she leaves her companions and seems to be the

victim of hypochondria. Then her mind wanders. At last you come upon her

suddenly some day, seated under the currant bushes. You sympathize with

her and you seek to fondle her. She then picks a small memento out of the

back of your hand. You then gently but firmly coax her out of there with a

hoe, and you find that she has been seated for some time on an old croquet

ball, trying to hatch out a whole set of croquet balls. This shows that

her mind is affected. You pick up the croquet ball, and find it hot and

feverish, so you throw it into the shade of the woodshed. Anon, you find

your demented hen in the loft of the barn hovering over a door knob and

trying by patience and industry to hatch out a hotel.

When a hen imagines that she is inspired to incubate, she at once ceases

to be an ornament to society and becomes a crank. She violates all the

laws and customs of nature and society in trying to hatch a conservatory

by setting through the long days and nights of summer on a small flower

pot.

Man may win the affections of the tiger, the lion, or the huge elephant,

and make them subservient to his wishes, but the setting hen is not

susceptible to affection. You might as well love the Manitoba blizzard or

try to quell the cyclone by looking calmly in its eye. The setting hen is

filled with hatred for every living thing. She loves to brood over her

wrongs or anything else she can find to squat on.

I once owned a hen that made a specialty of setting. She never ceased to

be the proud anonymous author of a new, warm egg, but she yearned to be a

parent. She therefore seated herself on a nest where other hens were in

the habit of leaving their handiwork for inspection. She remained there

during the summer hatching steadily on while the others laid, until she

filled my barnyard with little orphaned henlets of different ages. She

remained there night and day, patiently turning out poultry for me to be a

father to. I brought up on the bottle about one hundred that summer that

had been turned out by this morbidly maternal hen. All she seemed to ask

in return was my kind regards and esteem. I fed her upon the nest and

humored her in every way. Every day she became a parent, and every day

added to my responsibility.

[Illustration: SUCCESS WITH CHICKENS.]

One day I noticed that she seemed weak and there was a far away look in

her eye. For the first time the horrible truth burst upon my mind. I

buried my face in the haymow and I am not ashamed to say that I wept.

Strong man as I am, I am not too proud to say that I soaked that haymow

through with unavailing tears.

My hen was dying even then. Her breath came hot and quick like the swift

rush of a hot ball that caves in the short-stop and speeds away to

center-field.

The next morning one hundred chickens of various sizes were motherless,

and if anything had happened to me they would have been fatherless.

For many years I have made a close study of the setting hen, but I am

still unsettled as to what is best to do with her. She is a freak of

nature, a disagreeable anomaly, a fussy phenomenon. Logic, rhetoric and

metaphor are all alike to the setting hen. You might as well go down into

the bosom of Vesuvius and ask it to postpone the next eruption.

A Bright Future for Pugilism.

The recent prominence of Mr. John E. Dempsey, better known as Jack

Dempsey, of New York, brings to mind a four days' trip taken in his

company from Portland, Oregon, to St. Paul, over the Northern Pacific.

There were three pugilists in the party besides myself, viz. Dempsey, Dave

Campbell and Tom Cleary. We made a grand, triumphant tour across the

country together, and I may truthfully state that I never felt so free to

say anything I wanted to--to other passengers--as I did at that time. I

wish I could afford to take at least one pugilist with me all the time. In

traveling about the country lecturing, a good pugilist would be of great

assistance. I would like to set him on the man who always asks: “Where do

you go to from here, Mr. Nye?” He does not ask because he wants to know,

for the next moment he asks right over again. I do not know why he asks,

but surely it is not for the purpose of finding out.

Well, throughout our long journey across the State of Oregon and the

Territories of Idaho, Montana and Dakota, and the State of Minnesota, it

was one continual ovation. Dempsey had a world-wide reputation, I found,

co-extensive with the horizon, as I may say, and bounded only by the

zodiac.

In my great forthcoming work, entitled “Half-Hours with Great Men, or

Eminent People Which I Have Saw,” I shall give a fuller description of

this journey. The book will be a great boon.

Mr. Dempsey is not a man who would be picked out as a great man. You might

pass by him two or three times without recognizing his eminence, and yet,

at a scrapping matinee or swatting recital, he seems to hold his audiences

at his own sweet will--also his antagonist.

Mr. Dempsey does not crave notoriety. He seems rather to court seclusion.

This is characteristic of the man. See how he walked around all over the

State of New York last week--in the night, too--in order to evade the

crowd.

His logic, however, is wonderful. Though quiet and unassuming in his

manner, his arguments are powerful and generally make a large protuberance

wherever they alight.

Nothing is more pleasing than the sight of a man who has risen by his own

unaided effort, fought his way up, as it were, and yet who is not vain.

Mr. Dempsey conversed with me frequently during our journey, and did not

seem to feel above me.

I opened the conversation by telling him that I had seen a number of his

works. Nothing pleases a young author so much as a little friendly remark

in relation to his work. I had seen a study of his one day in New York

last spring. It was an italic nose with quotation marks on each side.

It was a very happy little bon mot on Mr. Dempsey's part, and attracted a

good deal of notice at the time.

Mr. Dempsey is not a college graduate, as many suppose. He is a self-made

man. This should be a great encouragement to our boys who are now unknown,

and whose portraits have not as yet appeared in the sporting papers.

But Mr. Dempsey's great force as a debater is less, perhaps, in the matter

than in the manner. His delivery is good and his gestures cannot fail to

convince the most skeptical. Striking in appearance, aggressive in his

nature, and happy in his gestures, he is certain to attract the attention

of the police, and he cannot fail to rivet the eye of his adversary. I saw

one of his adversaries, not long ago, whose eye had been successfully

riveted in that way.

And yet, John E. Dempsey was once a poor boy. He had none of the

advantages which wealth and position bring. But, confident of his latent

ability as a middle-weight convincer, he toiled on, ever on, sitting up

until long after other people had gone to bed, patiently knocking out

those who might be brought to him for that purpose. He never hung back

because the way looked long and lonely. And what is the result? To-day, in

the full vigor of manhood, he is sought out and petted by everyone who

takes an interest in the onward march of pugilism.

It is a wonderful record, though brief. It shows what patient industry

will accomplish unaided. Had John E. Dempsey hesitated to enter the ring

and said that he would rather go to school, where he would be safe, he

might to-day be an educated man; but what does that amount to here in

America, where everybody can have an education? He would have lost his

talent as a slugger, and drifted steadily downward, perhaps, till he

became a school-teacher or a narrow-chested editor, writing things day

after day just to gratify the morbid curiosity of a sin-cursed world.

In closing, I would like to say that I hope I have not expressed an

opinion in the above that may hereafter be used against me. Do not

understand me to be the foe of education. Education and refinement are

good enough in their places, but how shall we attract attention by trying

to become refined and educated in a land where, as I say, education and

refinement seem almost to run rampant.

Heretofore, in America, pugilism has been made subservient to the common

schools. Pugilism and polygamy have both been crowded to the wall. Now

pugilism is about to assert itself. The tin ear and the gory nose will

soon come to the front, and the day is not far distant when progressive

pugilism and the prize-ring will take the place of the poorly ventilated

common school and the enervating prayer meeting.

The Snake Indian.

There are about 5,000 Snake or Shoshone Indians now extant, the greater

part being in Utah and Nevada, though there is a reservation in Idaho and

another in Wyoming.

The Shoshone Indian is reluctant to accept of civilization on the European

plan. He prefers the ruder customs which have been handed down from father

to son along with other hairlooms. I use the word hairlooms in its

broadest sense.

There are the Shoshones proper and the Utes or Utahs, to which have been

added by some authorities the Comanches, and Moquis of New Mexico and

Arizona, the Netelas and other tribes of California. The Shoshone,

wherever found, is clothed in buckskin and blanket in winter, but dressed

more lightly in summer, wearing nothing but an air of intense gloom in

August. To this he adds on holidays a necklace made from the store teeth

of the hardy pioneer.

[Illustration: HOLIDAY COSTUME.]

The Snake or Shoshone Indian is passionately fond of the game known as

poker among us, and which, I learn, is played with cards. It is a game of

chance, though skill and a thorough knowledge of firearms are of great

use. The Indians enter into this game with great zeal, and lend to it the

wonderful energy which they have preserved from year to year by abstaining

from the debilitating effects of manual labor. All day long the red

warrior sits in his skin boudoir, nursing the sickly and reluctant

“flush,” patient, silent and hopeful. Through the cold of winter in the

desolate mountains, he continues to

“Hope on, hope ever,”

that he will “draw to fill.” Far away up the canyon he hears the sturdy

blows of his wife's tomahawk as she slaughters the grease wood and the

sage brush for the fire in his gilded hell where he sits and woos the lazy

Goddess of Fortune.

With the Shoshone, poker is not alone a relaxation, the game wherewith to

wear out a long and listless evening, but it is a passion, a duty and a

devotion. He has a face designed especially for poker. It never shows a

sign of good or evil fortune. You might as well try to win a smile from a

railroad right of way. The full hand, the fours, threes, pairs and

bob-tail flushes are all the same to him, if you judge by his face.

When he gets hungry he cinches himself a little tighter and continues to

“rastle” with fate. You look at his smoky, old copper cent of a face, and

you see no change. You watch him as he coins the last buckshot of his

tribe and later on when he goes forth a pauper, and the corners of his

famine-breeding mouth have never moved, His little black, smoke-inflamed

eyes have never lighted with triumph or joy. He is the great aboriginal

stoic and sylvan dude. He does not smile. He does not weep. It certainly

must be intensely pleasant to be a wild, free, lawless, irresponsible,

natural born fool.

[Illustration: GOING AWAY BROKE.]

The Shoshones proper include the Bannocks, which are again subdivided into

the Koolsitakara or Buffalo Eaters, on Wind River, the Tookarika or

Mountain Sheep Eaters, on Salmon or Suabe Eivers, the Shoshocas or White

Knives, sometimes called Diggers, of the Humbolt Eiver and the Great Salt

Lake basin. Probably the Hokandikahs, Yahooskins and the Wahlpapes are

subdivisions of the Digger tribe. I am 'not sure of this, but I shall not

suspend my business till I can find out about it. If I cannot get at a

great truth right off I wait patiently and go right on drawing my salary.

The Shoshones live on the government and other small game. They will eat

anything when hungry, from a buffalo down to a woodtick. The Shoshone does

not despise small things. He loves insects in any form. He loves to make

pets of them and to study their habits in his home life.

[Illustration: THE HOME CIRCLE.]

Formerly, when a great Shoshone warrior died, they killed his favorite

wife over his grave, so that she could go to the happy hunting grounds

with him, but it is not so customary now. I tried to impress on an old

Shoshone brave once that they ought not to do that. I tried to show him

that it would encourage celibacy and destroy domestic ties in his tribe.

Since then there has been quite a stride toward reform among them. Instead

of killing the widow on the death of the husband, the husband takes such

good care of his health and avoids all kinds of intellectual strain or

physical fatigue, that late years there are no widows, but widowers just

seem to swarm in the Shoshone tribe. The woods are full of them.

Now, if they would only kill the widower over the grave of the wife, the

Indian's future would assume a more definite shape.

Roller Skating.

I have once more tried to ride a pair of roller skates. That is the reason

I got down on the rink and down on roller skates. That is the reason

several people got down on me. That is also the reason why I now state in

a public manner, to a lost and undone race, that unless the roller-rink is

at once abolished, the whole civilized race will at once be plunged into

arnica.

I had tried it once before, but had not carried my experiments to a

successful termination. I made a trip around the rink last August, but was

ruled out by the judges for incompetency, and advised to skate among the

people who were hostile to the government of the United States, while the

proprietors repaired the rink.

On the 9th of June I nestled in the bosom of a cyclone to excess, and it

has required the bulk of the succeeding months for nature to glue the bone

of my leg together in proper shape. That is the reason I have not given

the attention to roller-skating that I should.

A few weeks ago I read what Mr. Talmage said about the great national

vice. It was his opinion that, if we skated in a proper spirit, we could

leave the rink each evening with our immortal souls in good shape.

Somehow it got out that on Thursday evening I would undertake the feat of

skating three rounds in three hours with no protection to my scruples, for

one-half the gate money, Talmage rules. So there was quite a large

audience present with opera glasses. Some had umbrellas, especially on the

front rows. These were worn spread, in order to ward off fragments of the

rink which might become disengaged and set in motion by atmospheric

disturbances.

In obedience to a wild, Wagnerian snort from the orchestra, I came into

the arena with my skates in hand. I feel perfectly at home before an

audience when I have my skates in hand. It is a morbid desire to wear the

skates on my feet that has always been my _bete noire_. Will the office

boy please give me a brass check for that word so that I can get it when I

go away?

My first thought, after getting myself secured to the skates, was this:

“Am I in the proper frame of mind? Am I doing this in the right spirit? Am

I about to skate in such a way as to lift the fog of unbelief which now

envelopes a sinful world, or shall I deepen the opaque night in which my

race is wrapped?”

Just then that end of the rink erupted in a manner so forthwith and so

_tout ensemble_ that I had to push it back in place with my person. I

never saw anything done with less delay or less languor.

The audience went wild with enthusiasm, and I responded to the encore by

writing my name in the air with my skates.

This closed the first seance, and my trainer took me in the dressing-room

to attend a consultation of physicians. After the rink carpenter had

jacked up the floor a little I went out again. I had no fears about my

ability to perform the mechanical part assigned me, but I was still

worried over the question of whether it would or would not be of lasting

benefit to mankind.

Those who have closely scrutinized my frame in repose have admitted that I

am fearfully and wonderfully made. Students of the human frame say that

they never saw such a wealth of looseness and limberness lavished upon one

person. They claim that nature bestowed upon me the hinges and joints

intended for a whole family, and therefore when I skate the air seems to

be perfectly lurid with limbs. I presume that this is true; though I have

so little leisure while skating in which to observe the method itself, the

plot or animus of the thing, as it were, that my opinion would be of

little value to the scientist.

I am led to believe that the roller skate is certainly a great civilizer

and a wonderful leveler of mankind. If we so skate that when the summons

comes to seek our ward in the general hospital, where each shall heal his

busted cuticle within the walls where rinkists squirm, we go not like the

moral wreck, morally paralyzed, but like a hired man taking his medicine,

and so forth--we may skate with perfect impunity, or anyone else to whom

we may be properly introduced by our cook.

No More Frontier.

The system of building railroads into the wilderness, and then allowing

the wilderness to develop afterward, has knocked the essential joy out of

the life of the pioneer. At one time the hardy hewer of wood and drawer of

water gave his lifetime willingly that his son might ride in the

“varnished cars.” Now the Pullman palace car takes the New Yorker to the

threshold of the sea, or to the boundary line between the United States

and the British possessions.

It has driven out the long handled frying pan and the flapjack of twenty

years ago, and introduced the condensed milk and canned fruit of commerce.

Along the highways, where once the hopeful hundreds marched with long

handled shovel and pick and pan, cooking by the way thin salt pork and

flapjacks and slumgullion, now the road is lined with empty beer bottles

and peach cans that have outlived their usefulness. No landscape can be

picturesque with an empty peach can in the foreground any more than a lion

would look grand in a red monogram horse blanket and false teeth.

[Illustration]

The modern camp is not the camp of the wilderness. It wears the

half-civilized and shabby genteel garments of a sawed-off town. You know

that if you ride a day you will be where you can get the daily papers and

read them under the electric light. That robs the old canyons of their

solemn isolation and peoples each gulch with the odor of codfish balls and

civilization. Civilization is not to blame for all this, and yet it seems

sad.

Civilization could not have done all this alone. It had to call to its aid

the infernal fruit can that now desolates the most obscure trail in the

heart of the mountains. You walk over chaos where the “hydraulic” has

plowed up the valley like a convulsion, or you tread the yielding path

across the deserted dump, and on all sides the rusty, neglected and

humiliated empty tin can stares at you with its monotonous, dude-like

stare.

An old timer said to me once: “I've about decided, Bill, that the West is

a matter of history. When we cooked our grub over a sage brush fire we

could get fat and fight Indians, but now we fill our digesters with the

cold pizen and pewter of the canned peach; we go to a big tavern and stick

a towel under our chins and eat pie with a fork and heat up our carkisses

with antichrist coal, and what do we amount to? Nuthin! I used to chase

Injuns all day and eat raw salt pork at night, bekuz I dassent build a

fire, and still I felt better than I do now with a wad of tin-can solder

in my stummick and a homesick feeling in my weather-beaten breast.

“No, we don't have the fun we used to. We have more swarrees and sciatica

and one bloomin' thing and another of that kind, but we don't get one

snort of pure air and appetite in a year. They're bringin' in their blamed

telephones now and malaria and aigue and old sledge, and fun might as well

skip out. There ain't no frontier any more. All we've got left is the

old-fashioned trantler joos and rhumatiz of '49.”

Behind the red squaw's cayuse plug,

The hand-car roars and raves,

And pie-plant pies are now produced

Above the Indian graves.

I hear the oaths of pioneers,

The caucus yet to be,

The first low hum where soon will

The fuzzy bumble bee.

A Letter of Regrets.

My dear Princess Beatrice--I received your kind invitation to come up to

Whippingham on the 23d inst. and see you married, but I have not been able

to get there. The weather has been so hot this month, that, to tell you

the truth, Beatrice, I haven't been going anywhere to speak of. At first I

thought I would go anyhow, and even went so far as to pick out a nice

corner bracket to take along for a wedding present. Not so much for its

intrinsic value, of course, but so you would have something with my name

to it on a card that you could show to those English dudes, and let them

know that you had influential friends, even in America. But when I thought

what a long, hard trip it would be, and how I would probably mash that

bracket on the cars before I got half way there, I gave it up.

I am not personally acquainted with your inamorato, if that's all right,

never having met him in our set; but I understand you have done well, and

that your husband is a rising young man of good family, and that he will

never allow you to put your hands into dishwater. I hope this is true and

that he does not drink. Rum has certainly paralyzed more dukes and such

things than war has. I attribute this to the fact that princes and dukes

are generally more reckless about exposing themselves to the demon rum

than to the rude alarums and one thing another of war.

If you keep a girl I hope you will get a good one who knows her business.

A green girl in the house of a newly-married princess is a great source of

annoyance. A friend of mine who got married last winter got a girl whose

mind had been eaten by cut-worms and she had not discovered it. All the

faculty that had been spared her was that power of the mind which enabled

her to charge $3 a week. She lubricated the buckwheat pancake griddle for

a week with soap grease and a dash of castor oil, and when she was

discharged she wept bitterly because capital with the iron heel ground the

poor servant girl into the dust.

Probably you will take a little tour after the wedding is over. They are

doing that way a good deal in Boston this season. I thought you would like

a pointer in the very lum-tumest thing to do, and so I write this. So long

as you have the means to do this thing right, I think you ought to do so.

You may never be married again, princess, and now is the time to paint the

British Isles red.

You can also get more concessions from your husband now, while he is a

little rattled, and temporarily knocked silly by the pomp and pageant of

marrying into your family, and if you work it right you can maintain this

supremacy for years. Treat him with a gentle firmness, and do not weep on

his bosom if you detect the aroma of beer and bologna sausage on his young

breath. Bologna and royalty do not seem to harmonize first-rate, but

remember you can harass your husband if you choose, so that he will fall

to even lower depths than bologna and Milwaukee beer. Do not aggravate him

when he comes home tired, but help him do the chores and greet him with a

smile.

I'd just as soon tell you, Beatrice, that this smile racket is not

original with me. I read it in a paper. This paper went on to say that a

young wife should always greet her husband with a smile on his return. I

showed the article to my wife and suggested that it was a good scheme, and

hoped she would try it on me sometime. She said if I would like to change

off awhile, and take my smile when I got home instead of taking it down

town, we would make the experiment. The trouble with the average woman of

the age in which we live, Beatrice, is that she is above her business. She

tries to be superior to her husband, and in many instances she succeeds.

That is the bane of wedded life. Do not strive to be superior to your

husband, Beatrice. If you do, it is good-bye, John.

Treat him well at all times, whether he treats you well or not; then when

your mother gets tired of reigning and wants to come down and spend the

hot weather with you, she will be kindly greeted by her son-in-law.

Do not allow the fact that you belong to the royal family to interfere

with your fun, Beatrice. If you want to wear a Mother Hubbard dress on the

throne during hot weather, or mash a mosquito with your mother's sceptre,

do so. Conventionality is a humbug and a nuisance, and I'd just as soon

tell you right here that if I could have gone to your wedding and worn a

linen coat and a perspiration, I would have gone; but to stand around

there all day in a tight black suit of clothes, in a mixed crowd of dukes,

and counts, and princes of high degree, most of whom are total strangers

to me, is more than I can stand.

I wish you would give my love to your mother and tell her just how it was.

Make it as smooth as you can and break it to her gently. Tell her that the

royal family is spreading out so that I can't leave my work every time one

of its members gets married. Remember me to the Waleses, the Darmstadts,

Princess Irene and Victoria, Mr. and Mrs. Prince Alexander of Bulgaria,

also Prince Francis of Battenberg and the Countess Erbach Schomberg. They

will all be there probably, and so will Lord Latham and Lord Edgcumbe. I

know just how Edgcumbe will snort around there when he finds that I can't

be there. Give my kind regards to any other lords, dukes, duchesses,

dowagers or marchionesses who may inquire for me, and tell them all that I

will be in London next year if the Prince of Wales will drop me a line

stating that the moral tone of the city is such that it would be safe for

me to come.

[Illustration]

Venice.

We arrived in Venice last evening, latitude 45 deg. 25 min, N., longitude

12 deg. 19 min. E.

Venice is the home of the Venetian, and also where the gondola has its

nest and rears its young. It is also the headquarters for the paint known

as Venetian red. They use it in painting the town on festive occasions.

This is the town where the Merchant of Venice used to do business, and the

home of Shylock, a broker, who sheared the Venetian lamb at the corner of

the Rialto and the Grand Canal. He is now no more. I couldn't even find an

old neighbor near the Rialto who remembered Shylock. From what I can learn

of him, however, I am led to believe that he was pretty close in his

deals, and liked to catch a man in a tight place and then make him squirm.

Shylock, during the great panic in Venice, many years ago, it is said, had

a chattel mortgage on more lives than you could shake a stick at. He would

loan a small amount to a merchant at three per cent, a month, and secure

it on a pound of the merchant's liver, or by a cut-throat mortgage on his

respiratory apparatus. Then, when the paper matured, he would go up to the

house with a pair of scales and a pie knife and demand a foreclosure.

Venice is one of the best watered towns in Europe. You can hardly walk a

block without getting your feet wet, unless you ride in a gondola.

The gondola is a long, slim hack without wheels and is worked around

through the damp streets by a brunette man whose breath should be a sad

framing to us all. He is called the gondolier. Sometimes he sings in a low

tone of voice and in a foreign tongue. I do not know where I have met so

many foreigners as I have here in Europe, unless it was in New York, at

the polls. Wherever I go, I hear a foreign tongue. I do not know whether

these people talk in the Italian language just to show off or not. Perhaps

they prefer it. London is the only place I have visited where the Boston

dialect is used. London was originally settled by adventurers from Boston.

The blood of some of the royal families of Massachusetts may be found in

the veins of London people.

Wealthy young ladies in Venice do not run away with the coachman. There

are no coaches, no coachmen and no horses in Venice. There are only four

horses in Venice and they are made of copper and exhibited at St Mark's as

curiosities.

The Accademia delle Belle Arti of Venice is a large picture store where I

went yesterday to buy a few pictures for Christmas presents. A painting by

Titian, the Italian Prang, pleased me very much, but I couldn't beat down

the price to where it would be any object for me to buy it. Besides, it

would be a nuisance to carry such a picture around with me all over the

Alps, up the Rhine and through St. Lawrence county. I finally decided to

leave it and secure something less awkward to carry and pay for.

The Italians are quite proud of their smoky old paintings. I have often

thought that if Venice would run less to art and more to soap, she would

be more apt to win my respect. Art is all right to a certain extent, but

it can be run in the ground. It breaks my heart to know how lavish nature

has been with water here, and yet how the Venetians scorn to investigate

its benefits. When a gondolier gets a drop of water on him, he swoons.

Then he lies in a kind of coma till another gondolier comes along to

breathe in his face and revive him.

She Kind of Coaxed Him.

I never practiced law very much, but during the brief period that my

sheet-iron sign was kissed by the Washoe zephyr, I had several odd

experiences. I'm sure that lawyers who practice for forty years,

especially on the frontier or in a new country, could write a large book

that would make mighty interesting reading.

One day I was figuring up how much a man could save in ten years, paying

forty dollars a month rent, and taking in two dollars and fifty cents per

month, when a large man with a sad eye and an early purple tumor on the

side of his head, came in and asked me if my name was Nye. I told him it

was and asked him to take a chair and spit on the stove a few times, and

make himself entirely at home.

He did so.

After answering in a loud, tremulous tone of voice that we were having

rather a backward spring, he produced a red cotton handkerchief and took

out of it a deed which he submitted to my ripe and logical legal mind.

I asked him if that was his name that appeared in the body of the deed as

grantor. He said it was. I then asked him why his wife had not signed it,

as it seemed to be the homestead, and her name appeared in the instrument

with that of her husband, but her signature wasn't at the foot, though his

name was duly signed, witnessed and acknowledged.

“Well,” said he, “there's where the gazelle comes in.” He then took a bite

off the corner of a plug of tobacco about as big as a railroad land grant,

and laid two twenty dollar gold pieces on the desk near my arm. I took

them and tapped them together like the cashier of the Bank of England,

and, disguising my annoyance over the little episode, told him to go on.

“Well,” said the large man, fondling the wen which nestled lovingly in his

faded Titian hair, “my wife has conscientious scruples against signing

that deed. We have been married about a year now, but not actively for the

past eleven months. I'm kind of _ex-officio_ husband, as you might say.

After we'd been married about a month a little incident occurred which

made a riffle, as you might say, in our domestic tide. I was division

master on the U.P., and one night I got an order to go down towards

Sidney and look at a bridge. Of course I couldn't get back till the next

evening. So I sighed and switched off to the superintendent's office,

expecting to go over on No. 4 and look at the bridge. At the office they

told me that I needn't go till Tuesday, so I strolled up town and got home

about nine o'clock, went in with a latch key, just as a mutual friend went

out through the bed-room window, taking a sash that I paid two dollars

for. I didn't care for the sash, because he left a pair of pantaloons

worth twelve dollars and some silver in the pockets, but I thought it was

such odd taste for a man to wear a sash without his uniform.

“Well, as I had documentary evidence against my wife, I told her she could

take a vacation. She cried a good deal, but it didn't count I suffered a

good deal, but tears did not avail. It takes a good deal of damp weather

to float me out of my regular channel. She spent the night packing her

trousseau, and in the morning she went away. Now, I could get a divorce and

save all this trouble of getting her signature, but I'd rather not tell

this whole business in court, for the little woman seems to be trying to

do better, and if it wasn't for her blamed old hyena of a mother, would

get along tip-top. She's living with her mother now and if a lawyer would

go to the girl and tell her how it is, and that I want to sell the

property and want her signature, in place of getting a divorce, I believe

she'd sign. Would you mind trying it?”

[Illustration: “COAXING.”]

I said if I could get time I would go over and talk with her and see what

she said. So I did. I got along pretty well, too. I found the young woman

at home, and told her the legal aspects of the case. She wouldn't admit

any of the charges, but after a long parley agreed to execute the deed and

save trouble. She came to my office an hour later, and signed the

instrument I got two witnesses to the signature and had just put the

notarial seal on it when the girl's mother came in. She asked her daughter

if she had signed the deed and was told that she had. She said nothing,

but smiled in a way that made my blood run cold. If a woman were to smile

on me that way every day, I should certainly commit some great crime.

I was just congratulating myself on the success of the business, and was

looking at the two $20 gold pieces and trying to get acquainted with them,

as it were, after the two women had gone away; when they returned with the

husband and son-in-law at the head of the procession. He looked pale and

careworn to me. He asked me in a low voice if I had a deed there, executed

by his wife. I said yes. He then asked me if I would kindly destroy it. I

said I would. I would make deeds and tear them up all day at $40 apiece. I

said I liked the conveyancing business very much, and if a client felt

like having a grand, warranty deed debauch, I was there to furnish the raw

material.

I then tore up the deed and the two women went quietly away. After they

had gone, my client, in an absent-minded way, took out a large quid that

had outlived its usefulness, laid it tenderly on the open page of Estey's

Pleadings, and said:

“You doubtless think I am a singular organization, and that my ways are

past finding out. I wish to ask you if I did right a moment ago?” Here he

took out another $20 and put it under the paper weight. “When I went down

stairs I met my mother-in-law. She always looked to me like a firm woman,

but I did not think she was so unswerving as she really was. She asked me

in a low, musical voice to please destroy the deed, and then she took one

of them Smith & Wesson automatic advance agents of death out from under

her apron and kind of wheedled me into saying I would. Now, did I do

right? I want a candid, legal opinion, and I'm ready to pay for it.”

Remarks · 第 29 / 30 题