THE WAY OF WESTMINSTER.

(_A STORY OF THE PARLIAMENTARY BAR._)

"You will not forget, Sir," said my excellent and admirable clerk,

"that to-morrow you have to appear before a Committee of the House of

Commons, in the matter of the Glogsweller Railway Extension?"

[Illustration]

I glanced somewhat severely at PORTINGTON, but was gratified to find

that his face was quite free from any suggestion of levity. I was

the more pleased with the result of my investigation, as, truth to

tell, the delivery of a brief in the matter of the Extension of the

Glogsweller Railway Company had been somewhat of an event in my life.

I had never before had the honour of practising at the Parliamentary

Bar. So for months my mind had been entirely occupied with the date

fixed for my appearance in the Committee Room of the House of Commons,

known technically, I believe, at St. Stephens, as "upstairs."

"You will be sure to meet me there, to-morrow, PORTINGTON?" I

observed.

"Certainly, Sir," replied my clerk. "But, as I have to be down at the

Mayor's Court with Mr. CHARLES O'MULLIGAN in the morning, I daresay

you won't mind if I come with your sandwiches and sherry, Sir, at two,

or thereabouts."

I acquiesced, somewhat unwillingly. O'MULLIGAN shares with me the good

offices of PORTINGTON, but generally contrives to secure the lion's

portion of his services. I had arranged--understanding that no

adjournment was made for luncheon--that some refreshment should be

conveyed to me during the day's proceedings, so that my voice should

lose none of its wonted resonance (owing to famine-produced weakness)

when the time arrived for my advocacy of the cause of my clients.

Those clients had, so to speak, but a collateral interest in the day's

proceedings. The great North-East Diddlesex Railway were promoting

a Bill to carry a new line into the neighbourhood of the Glogsweller

Extension, and my duty was confined to cross-examining one of the

expert witnesses that I knew would be asked to support the G.N.E.D.R.

To be candid, we had a goods depôt near their suggested terminus, and

were fearful that their proposed proximity would damage our mineral

traffic. The matter was simple enough, but I had taken months in

carefully studying a small library of charts, Encyclopædias, and

Parliamentary Blue Books, in mastering it.

On the morning following my conversation with PORTINGTON, duly robed

(I had put on my wig and gown in Chambers), I travelled by hansom

to Westminster, and presented myself at the side entrance to St.

Stephen's Hall. I had no difficulty in finding the Committee Room

devoted to the consideration of the alleged necessities of the Great

North-East Diddlesex Railway. It was a large and pleasant apartment,

with a distant view through the windows of St. Thomas's Hospital. At

a horse-shoe table sat the Committee, some four or five gentlemen, who

might have filled equally appropriately any one of the pews reserved

in the Royal Courts for the accommodation of a Special Jury. I took

my place amongst a number of my learned brethren, who were perfect

strangers to me. The table in front of us was littered with plans,

charts, and documents of all descriptions. A Q.C. brought with him

a large bag of buns, and two cups of custard, and there were other

refreshments mingled with the exhibits before us. On chairs at the

side were Solicitors; at our back, separated from us by a bar,

were the Public. On the walls were hanging huge charts, giving in

pantomimic proportions the proposed progress of the projected line.

In the corners of these charts were explanations why such a part

was coloured green, or red, or blue. During the day's proceedings an

attendant was told off to trace the course of a counsel's harangue by

pointing out, with a lecturer's wand, the various places referred to

in his speech.

I was gratified to find that the expert whose evidence it was my duty

to test by cross-examination, was soon in the witness-box. He was a

gentleman of considerable bulk, which gave one of my learned friends,

who was the first to take him in hand, the opportunity of saying,

that he was a "witness of great weight," a remark which caused much

laughter--even the Chairman of the Committee, a somewhat austere

person, indulging in a stealthy smile at the ingenious sally. Such

waggish flashes as this, I need scarcely say, were most welcome, and

afforded, when they came, a pleasant relief to the necessary dryness

that characterised, perforce, the proceedings. As the hands of the

clock progressed, waiters carried into the Committee, various light

refreshments, such as brandy-and-sodawater, sandwiches, and buns. My

colleagues, too, when not actively engaged in the declamatory duties

of their profession, partook of the viands with which they had

provided themselves before the commencement of the day's labours. Thus

the cups devoted to custard soon were empty, and the paper bags, once

occupied by buns, crumpled up and discarded. I gazed at the clock.

It was past two, and I was getting terribly hungry. I felt that my

voice was becoming weak from famine. This would never do, and might

endanger my clients' interests. I looked round eagerly for PORTINGTON.

He was nowhere to be seen. I whispered to a colleague, "would the

examination-in-chief last much longer?" and was told it could not

possibly be concluded within a quarter of an hour. I made up my mind

to hasten to a refreshment-bar I had seen in the corridor before I had

entered the room, and hurriedly left my seat. I pushed my way through

the public, and had scarcely got outside when I found my faithful

clerk laden with sandwiches and sherry making post-haste towards me.

"Get back, Sir, as quick as you can," he cried, as he thrust the

invigorating ingredients of my midday meal into my hands; "run, Sir,

run; I hope they haven't noticed your absence!"

Rather offended at the peremptory tone adopted by my subordinate

I returned to my seat, and was pleased to find that the

examination-in-chief was nearly ended. I pulled myself together.

I drank a glass of sherry and finished a sandwich. My voice was in

excellent tone, and I felt that the crisis of my life had indeed been

reached. I knew that it was now or never. I had this great chance of

distinguishing myself by pleasing my clients and securing a practice

at the Parliamentary Bar, which might mean hundreds, nay, thousands

a-year. I imagined my children at Eton, my wife in a carriage and

pair, my address in Grosvenor Place. All I had to do to secure these

tardily-attained luxuries was to protect my clients by my careful

attention to their interests. The moment at length arrived. I rose to

cross-examine.

"And now, Sir," I said; feeling that I was master of the situation,

and that my voice had a magnificent resonance, which was striking

terror into the heart of the witness before me, _I_ am going to put a

few questions to you!"

"I beg pardon," said the Chairman, promptly--"you will do nothing of

the sort. You were not present during the _whole_ of the witness's

* * * * *

I could have wept! The momentary search for sandwiches and sherry had

ruined me! Eton and Grosvenor Place vanished together (in the carriage

and pair) for ever!

_Pump-Handle Court_. (_Signed_) A. BRIEFLESS, JUNIOR.

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 100, April 4, 1891 · 第 13 / 34 题