CHAPTER II

CONSCIOUSNESS

We took a glimpse at random into the mental life of an adult

consciousness, and found it very complicated, constantly changing. We

found it packed with shifting material, which, on the surface, seemed to

bear very little relation. We found reason, feeling, and will all

interacting. We found nothing to indicate that a consciousness as simple

as mere _awareness_ might exist. We believe there might be such in the

newborn babe, perhaps even in the baby a month old; but can we prove it?

Let us look within again and see if there are not times of mere, bare

consciousness in our own experience that give us the proof we need.

I have slept deeply all night. It is my usual waking time. Something

from within or from without forces an impression upon my mind, and I

stir, and slowly open my eyes. As yet I have really not seen anything.

With my eyes open my mind still sleeps--but in a few seconds comes a

possessing sense of well-being. Obeying some stimulus, not recognized by

the senses as yet, I begin to stretch and yawn, then close my eyes and

settle down into my pillows as for another nap. I am not aware that I

am I, that I am awake, that I have yawned and stretched. I have a

pleasant, half-dreamy feeling, but could not give it a name. For those

few seconds this is all my world--a pleasant drowsiness, a being

possessed by comfort. My consciousness is mere awareness--a pleasant

awareness of uncomplicated existence. In another moment or two it is a

consciousness of a day's work or pleasure ahead, the necessity of

rising, dressing, planning the day, the alert reaction of pleasure or

displeasure to what it is to bring, the effort to recall the dreams of

sleep--the complicated consciousness of the mature man or woman. But I

started the day with a mental condition close to pure sensation, a vague

feeling of something different than what was just before.

Or this bare consciousness may come in the moment of acute shock, when

the sense of suffering, quite disconnected from its cause, pervades my

entire being; or at the second when I am first "coming back" after a

faint, or at the first stepping out from an anesthetic. In these

experiences most of us can recall a very simple mental content, and can

prove to our own satisfaction that there is such a thing as mere

awareness, a consciousness probably close akin to that of the lower

levels of animal life, or to that of the newborn babe when he first

opens his eyes to life.

_Consciousness_, then, in its elements, is the simplest mental reaction

to what the senses bring.

How shall we determine when consciousness exists? What are its tests?

The response of the mind to stimuli, made evident by the body's

reaction, gives the proof of consciousness in man or lower animal.

But what do we mean by a stimulus?

Light stimulates me to close my eyes when first entering its glare from

a dark room, or to open them when it plays upon my eyelids as I sleep

and the morning sun reaches me. It is a stimulus from without.

The fear-thought, which makes my body tremble, my pupils grow wide, and

whitens my cheeks, is a stimulus from within.

An unexpected shot in the woods near-by, which changes the whole trend

of my thinking and startles me into investigating its cause, is a

stimulus from without causing a change within.

A _stimulus_, then, is anything within or without the body that arouses

awareness; and this is usually evidenced by some physical change,

however slight--perhaps only by dilated pupils or an expression of

relief. When we see the reaction of the body to the stimulus we know

there is consciousness. On the other hand, we cannot say that

consciousness is always absent when the usual response does not occur;

for there may be injury to organs accounting for the lack of visible

reaction, while the mind itself may respond. But with due care, in even

such cases, some external symptoms of response can usually be found if

consciousness exists.

We have already realized how complex, intricate, and changing is fully

developed consciousness.

THE UNCONSCIOUS

But the mind of man knows two distinct conditions of activity--the

conscious and the unconscious. Mind is not always wide awake. We

recognize what we call the _conscious_ mind as the ruling force in our

lives. But how many things I do without conscious attention; how often I

find myself deep in an unexplainable mood; how the fragrance of a flower

will sometimes turn the tide of a day for me and make me square my

shoulders and go at my task with renewed vigor; or a casual glimpse of a

face in the street turn my attention away from my errand and settle my

mind into a brown study. Usually I am alert enough to control these

errant reactions, but I am keenly aware of their demands upon my mind,

and frequently it is only with conscious effort that I am kept upon my

way unswerved by them, though not unmoved.

When we realize that nothing that has ever happened in our experience is

forgotten; that nothing once in consciousness altogether drops out, but

is stored away waiting to be used some day--waiting for a voice from the

conscious world to recall it from oblivion--then we grasp the fact that

the quality of present thought or reaction is largely determined by the

sum of all past thinking and acting. Just as my body is the result of

the heritage of many ancestors plus the food I give it and the use to

which I subject it, so my mind's capacity is determined by my

inheritance plus the mental food I give it, plus everything to which I

have subjected it since the day I was born. For it forgets absolutely

nothing.

"That is not true," you say, "for I have tried desperately to remember

certain incidents, certain lessons learned--and they are _gone_.

Moreover, I cannot remember what happened back there in my babyhood."

Ah, but you are mistaken, my friend. For you react to your task today

differently because of the thing which you learned and have "forgotten."

Your mind works differently because of what you disregarded then. "You"

have forgotten it, but your brain-cells, your nerve-cells have not; and

you are not quite the same person you would be without that forgotten

experience, or that pressing stimulus, which you never consciously

recognized, but allowed your subconsciousness to accept. Some night you

have a strange, incomprehensible dream. You cannot find its source, but

it is merely the re-enacting of some past sensation or experience of

your own, fantastically arrayed. Some day you stop short in your hurried

walk with a feeling of compulsion which you cannot resist. You know no

reason for it, but some association with this particular spot, or some

vague resemblance, haunts you. You cannot "place" it. One day you hit

the tennis-ball at a little different angle than you planned because a

queer thought came unbidden and directed your attention aside. Again,

under terrific stress, with sick body and aching nerves, you go on and

do your stint almost mechanically. You do not know where the strength or

the skill is derived. But your unconscious or subconscious--as you

will--has asserted itself, has usurped the place of the sick conscious,

and enabled you automatically to go on. For we react to the storehouse

of the unconscious even as we do to the conscious.

Remember that the unconscious is simply the latent conscious--what once

was conscious and may be again, but is now buried out of sight.

The mind may be likened to a great sea upon which there are visible a

few islands. The islands represent the conscious thoughts--that

consciousness we use to calculate, to map out our plans, to form our

judgments. This is the mind that for centuries was accepted as all the

mind. But we know that the islands are merely the tops of huge

mountain-ranges formed by the floor of the sea in mighty, permanent

upheaval; that as this sea-floor rises high above its customary level

and thrusts its bulk above the waters into the atmosphere, is the island

possible.

Just so there can be no consciousness except as that which is already in

the mind--the vast subconscious material of all experience--rises into

view and relates itself through the senses to an outside world. We speak

very glibly of motion, of force, of power. We say "The car is moving

now." But how do we know? Away back there in our babyhood there were

some things that always remained in the same place, while others changed

position. The _changing_ gave our baby minds a queer sensation; it made

a definite impression; and sometimes we heard people say "move," when

that impression came. Finally, we call the feeling of that change

"move," or "movement," or "motion." The word thereafter always brings to

our minds a picture of a change from one place to another. The

process--the slow comprehending of the baby mind--was buried in

forgetfulness even at the time. But had not the subconscious been

imprinted with the incident and all its succeeding associations, that

particular phenomenon we could not name today. It would be an entirely

unique experience. So our recognition of the impression is merely the

rising into consciousness of the subconscious material in response to a

stimulus from the outside world which appeals through the sense of

sight. We can get no response whatever except as the stimulus asking our

attention is related by "like" or "not like" something already

experienced; that is, it must bear some relation to the known--and

perhaps forgotten--just as the island cannot be, except as, from far

down below, the sea-floor leaves its bed and raises itself through the

deeps. The visible island is but a symbol of the submarine mountain.

The present mental impression is but proof of a great bulk of past

experiences.

And so we might carry on the figure and compare the birth of

consciousness to the instant of appearance of the mountain top above the

water's surface. It is not a new bit of land. It is only emerging into a

new world.

"But," you ask, "do you mean to assert that the baby's mind is a

finished product at birth; that coming into life is simply the last

stage of its growth? How unconvincing your theory is."

No, we only now have the soil for consciousness. The island and the

submarine mountain are different things. The sea-floor is transformed

when it enters into the new element. An entirely different vegetation

takes place on this visible island than took place on the floor of the

sea before it emerged. But the only new elements added to the hitherto

submerged land come from the new atmosphere, and the sea-floor

immediately begins to become a very different thing. Nevertheless, what

it is as an island is now, and forever will be due, primarily, to its

structure as a submarine mountain. In the new atmosphere the soil is

changed, new chemical elements enter in, seeds are brought to it by the

four winds--and it is changed. But it is still the sea-floor

transformed.

Just so the baby brain, complete in parts and mechanism at birth, is a

different brain with every day of growth in its new environment, with

every contact with the external world. But it is, primarily and in its

elements, the brain evolved through thousands of centuries of pushing up

to man's level through the sea of animal life, and hundreds of centuries

more of the development of man's brain to its present complete mechanism

through experience with constantly changing environment.

Hence, when the baby sees light and responds by tightly shutting his

eyes, then later by opening them to investigate, his sensation is what

it is because through the aëons of the past man has established a

certain relation to light through experiencing it. To go further than

this, and to find the very beginning, how the first created life came to

respond to environment at all, is to go beyond the realm of the actually

known. But that he did once _first_ experience his environment, and

establish a reaction that is now racial, we know.

So our baby soon shows certain "instinctive" reactions. He reaches out

to grasp. He sucks, he cries, he looks at light and bright objects in

preference to dark, he is carrying out the history of his race, but is

making it personal. He has evolved a new life, but all his ancestors

make its foundation. The personal element, added to his heritage, has

made him different from any and all of his forebears. But he can have no

consciousness except as a bit from the vast inherited accumulation of

the past of his ancestors, of all the race, steps forth to meet a new

environment.

And again you ask, "How came the first consciousness?"

And again I answer, "It is as far back as the first created or evolved

organism which could respond in any way to a material world; and only

metaphysics and the God behind metaphysics can say."

We only know that careful laboratory work in psychology--experiments on

the unconscious--today prove that our conscious life is what it is,

because of: _first_, what is stored away in the unconscious (_i. e._,

what all our past life and the past life of the race has put there);

_second_, because of what we have accepted from our environment; and

this comprises our material, intellectual, social, and spiritual

environment.

CONSCIOUSNESS IS COMPLEX

The one fact we want at this stage of our inquiry is simply this: that

consciousness, awaking at birth, very soon becomes complex. However

single and simple in content immediate consciousness may be, it is so

intimately linked with all preceding experience that a pure sensation is

probably never known after the first second of life. As the sensation is

registered it becomes a basis for comparison. That first sensation,

perhaps, was just a feeling of _something_. The next is a feeling of

something that is the same, or is not the same, as the first. So

immediately perception is established. The baby consciousness recognizes

that the vague feeling is, or is not, _that same thing_. And from

perception to a complex consciousness of perceptions, of ideas, of

memories and relations, and judgments, is so short a step that we cannot

use our measuring rods to span it.

Thus through the various stages of life, from infancy to maturity, the

conscious is passing into the unconscious, only to help form later a new

conscious thought. Hence the conscious thought is determined by the

great mass of the unconscious, plus the external world.

But every thought, relegated to the unconscious, through its association

there--for it is plastic by nature--comes back to consciousness never

quite the same, and meets never quite the same stimulus. And as a result

a repeated mental experience is never twice exactly the same. So the

conscious becomes the unconscious and the unconscious the conscious, and

neither can be without the other.

Our problem is to understand the workings of the mind as it exists

today, and to try to find some of its most constructive uses; and on

that we shall focus attention. To that end we must first examine the

various ways in which consciousness expresses itself.

We have recognized two distinct mental states--the conscious and the

unconscious--and have found them constantly pressing each on the other's

domain. Our study of consciousness reveals the normal in the aspects of

sleeping and waking, also various abnormal states. Consciousness may

become excited, depressed, confused, delirious, or insane. We shall

consider later some of the mental workings that account for these

abnormal expressions. At present let us examine the mind's activities in

sleep and in delirium.

CONSCIOUSNESS IN SLEEP

Sleep seldom, if ever, is a condition of utter unconsciousness. We so

frequently have at least a vague recollection, when we wake, of

dreaming--whether or not we remember the dream material--that we are

inclined to accept sleep as always a state of some kind of mental

activity, though waking so often wipes the slate clean. A new word which

serves our purpose well has come into common use these last years, and

we describe sleep as a state of rest of the conscious mind made possible

as weariness overpowers the _censor_, and this guard at the gate naps.

The censor is merely that mental activity which forces the mind to keen,

alert, constructive attention during our waking hours, a guard who

_censors_ whatever enters the conscious mind and compares it with

reality, forcing back all that is not of immediate use, or that is

undesirable, or that contradicts established modes of life or thought.

In sleep we might say that the censor, wearied by long vigilance,

presses all the material--constantly surging from the unconscious into

consciousness, there to meet and establish relations with matter--back

into the unconscious realms, and locks the door, and lies and slumbers.

Then the half-thoughts, the disregarded material, the unfit, the

unexpressed longings or fears, the forbidden thoughts; in fact, the

whole accumulation of the disregarded or forgotten, good, bad, and

indifferent--for the unconscious has no moral sense--seize their

opportunity. The guard has refused to let them pass. He is now asleep.

And the more insistent of them pick the lock and slip by, masquerading

in false characters, and flit about the realms of the sleeping

consciousness as ghosts in the shelter of darkness. If the guard

half-wakes he sleepily sees only legitimate forms; for the dreams are

well disguised. His waking makes them scurry back, sometimes leaving no

trace of their lawless wanderings. So the unconscious thoughts of the

day have become sleep-consciousness by play acting.

CONSCIOUSNESS IN DELIRIUM

At this time of our study it will suffice to say that in delirium and in

insanity, which we might very broadly call a prolonged delirium, the

toxic brain becomes a house in disorder. The censor is sick, and

sequence and coherence are lost as the thronging thoughts of the

unconscious mind press beyond the portals into consciousness, disordered

and confused. We shall later find, however, that this very disorder

falls into a sort of order of its own, and a dominant emotion of pain or

ecstasy, of depression or fear, of exaltation or depreciation calls

steadily upon the stored away incidents and remembered, related

feelings of the past and interprets them as present reality. The censor

of the sick brain is stupefied by toxins, shock, or exhaustion, and the

citadel he is supposed to guard is thronged with besiegers from every

side. The strongest--_i. e._, those equipped with most associations

pertinent to the emotional status at the time--win out, occupy the brain

by force, and demand recognition and expression from all the senses,

deluding them by their guise of the reality of external matter.

We find consciousness, then, determined by all past experience, by an

external world, and by its organ of expression--the _brain_.

Consequently, our psychology leads us into anatomy and physiology,

which, probably, we have already fairly mastered. In rapid review, only,

in the following chapter we shall consider the organs of man's

consciousness, the brain, spinal cord, and the senses, and try to

establish some relation between the material body and its mighty

propelling force--the _mind_.

Applied Psychology for Nurses · 第 2 / 14 章