The natural interpretation of this certainly is that Vaughan

E-text prepared by Susan Skinner, David Cortesi, and the Project Gutenberg

Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net)

Transcriber's note:

The ligatures oe and OE are indicated by [oe] and [OE].

The carat (^) indicates a superscript in the original. One

carat indicates that the following single letter is

superscript. A pair of carats indicates that the enclosed

letters are superscript; for example the abbreviations

8^vo^ and 12^mo^ are used for the printer's page sizes

octavo and duodecimo respectively.

In the poem "In Etesiam Lachrymantem" (Page 221) the

initial letter of the final line is missing in all extant

editions; either "C" or "D" seems possible.

In the Boethius translation Lib. IV. Metrum VI. (page 230),

the letter 'y' has been added to make line 9/10 read

"...though they/See other stars..." although it is missing

in all available editions.

At many points a period, comma or hyphen seems to be

omitted in the original. Obvious typographical errors have

been corrected, but where missing punctuation is not clearly

an error, or the omission is harmless to the sense, the text

remains as in the original.

Footnotes in the original appear on the page where they are

referenced and are numbered from 1 on each page. Here

footnotes are numbered consecutively throughout the book and

are grouped following each chapter or poem to which they

refer. To locate footnote 17 (for example) search for [17].

Another search for [17] returns to the point of reference.

POEMS OF HENRY VAUGHAN

SILURIST.

VOL. II.

The Muses' Library

POEMS OF HENRY VAUGHAN

SILURIST

Edited by E. K. Chambers

With an Introduction by Canon Beeching

VOL. II.

London:

George Routledge & Sons, Limited

New York: E. P. Dutton & Co.

CONTENTS OF VOL. II.

PAGE

TABLE OF CONTENTS vii

BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE xv

BIBLIOGRAPHY OF HENRY VAUGHAN'S WORKS lvii

POEMS WITH THE TENTH SATIRE OF JUVENAL ENGLISHED, 1646 1

To all Ingenious Lovers of Poesy 3

To my Ingenuous Friend, R. W. 5

Les Amours 8

To Amoret. The Sigh 10

To his Friend, Being in Love 11

Song: [Amyntas go, thou art Undone] 12

To Amoret. Walking in a Starry Evening 13

To Amoret Gone from him 15

A Song to Amoret 16

An Elegy 17

A Rhapsodis 18

To Amoret, of the Difference 'twixt him and other Lovers, 21

and what True Love is

To Amoret Weeping 23

Upon the Priory Grove, his Usual Retirement 26

Juvenal's Tenth Satire Translated 28

OLOR ISCANUS. 1651.

Ad Posteros 51

To the ... Lord Kildare Digby 53

The Publisher to the Reader 55

Upon the Most Ingenious Pair of Twins, Eugenius 57

Philalethes and the Author of those Poems [by T. Powell,

Oxoniensis]

To my Friend the Author upon these his Poems [by I. 58

Rowlandson, Oxoniensis]

Upon the following Poems [by Eugenius Philalethes, 59

Oxoniensis]

Olor Iscanus. To the River Isca 61

The Charnel-House 65

In Amicum Foeneratorem 68

To his Friend ---- 70

To his Retired Friend, An Invitation to Brecknock 73

Monsieur Gombauld 77

An Elegy on the Death of Mr. R. W., Slain in the late 79

Unfortunate Differences at Routon Heath, near Chester,

1645

Upon a Cloak lent him by Mr. J. Ridsley 83

Upon Mr. Fletcher's Plays, Published 1647 87

Upon the Poems and Plays of the Ever-Memorable Mr. William 90

Cartwright

To the Best and Most Accomplished Couple ---- 92

An Elegy on the Death of Mr. R. Hall, Slain at Pontefract, 94

1648

To my Learned Friend, Mr. T. Powell, upon his Translation 97

of Malvezzi's Christian Politician

To my Worthy Friend, Master T. Lewes 99

To the Most Excellently Accomplished Mrs. K. Philips 100

An Epitaph upon the Lady Elizabeth, Second Daughter to his 102

Late Majesty

To Sir William Davenant upon his Gondibert 104

TRANSLATIONS FROM OVID.

To his Fellow Poets at Rome, upon the Birthday of Bacchus 106

To his Friends--after his Many Solicitations--Refusing to 109

Petition Caesar for his Releasement

To his Inconstant Friend, Translated for the Use of all 112

the Judases of this Touchstone Age

To his Wife at Rome, when he was Sick 115

Ausonii. Idyll vi. Cupido [Cruci Affixus] 119

[Translations from Boethius] 125

[Translations from Casimirus] 144

The Praise of a Religious Life of Mathias Casimirus. In 152

Answer to that Ode of Horace, Beatus Ille Qui Procul

Negotiis.

Ad Fluvium Iscam 157

Venerabili Viro, Praeceptori Suo Olim Et Semper 158

Colendissimo Magistro Mathaeo Herbert

Praestantissimo Viro, Thomae Poello In Suum De Elementis 159

Opticae Libellum

Ad Echum 160

THALIA REDIVIVA. 1678.

To ... Henry Lord Marquis and Earl of Worcester, &c. 163

[by J. W.]

To the Reader [by I. W.] 167

To Mr. Henry Vaughan, the Silurist: upon These and his 169

Former Poems. [By Orinda]

Upon the Ingenious Poems of his Learned Friend, Mr. Henry 171

Vaughan, the Silurist. [By Tho. Powell, D.D.]

To the Ingenious Author of Thalia Rediviva [By N. W., 172

Jes. Coll., Oxon.]

To my Worthy Friend Mr. Henry Vaughan, the Silurist. 175

[by I. W., A.M., Oxon.]

CHOICE POEMS ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS.

To his Learned Friend and Loyal Fellow-Prisoner, Thomas 178

Powel of Cant[reff], Doctor of Divinity

The King Disguised 181

The Eagle 184

To Mr. M. L. upon his Reduction of the Psalms into Method 187

To the Pious Memory of C[harles] W[albeoffe] Esquire, Who 189

Finished his Course Here, and Made his Entrance into

Immortality upon the 13 of September, in the Year of

Redemption, 1653

In Zodiacum Marcelli Palingenii 193

To Lysimachus, the Author Being with him in London 195

On Sir Thomas Bodley's Library, the Author Being Then in 197

Oxford

The Importunate Fortune, Written to Dr. Powel, of 200

Cant[reff]

To I. Morgan of Whitehall, Esq., upon his Sudden Journey 204

and Succeeding Marriage

Fida; or, The Country Beauty. To Lysimachus 206

Fida Forsaken 209

To the Editor of the Matchless Orinda 211

Upon Sudden News of the Much-Lamented Death of Judge 213

Trevers

To Etesia (for Timander); The First Sight 214

The Character, to Etesia 217

To Etesia Looking from her Casement at the Full Moon 219

To Etesia Parted from Him, and Looking Back 220

In Etesiam Lachrymantem 221

To Etesia Going Beyond Sea 222

Etesia Absent 223

TRANSLATIONS.

Some Odes of the Excellent and Knowing [Anicius Manlius] 224

Severinus [Boethius], Englished

The Old Man of Verona, out of Claudian 236

The Sphere of Archimedes, out of Claudian 238

The Ph[oe]nix, out of Claudian 239

PIOUS THOUGHTS AND EJACULATIONS.

To his Books 245

Looking Back 247

The Shower 248

Discipline 249

The Eclipse 250

Affliction 251

Retirement 252

The Revival 254

The Day Spring 255

The Recovery 257

The Nativity 259

The True Christmas 261

The Request 263

Jordanis 265

Servilii Fatum, Sive Vindicta Divina 266

De Salmone 267

The World 268

The Bee 272

To Christian Religion 276

Daphnis 278

FRAGMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS. 1641-1661.

From Eucharistica Oxoniensia (1641) 289

From Of the Benefit we may get by our Enemies (1651) 291

From Of the Diseases of the Mind and the Body (1651) 293

From The Mount of Olives (1652) 294

From Man in Glory (1652) 298

From Flores Solitudinis (1654) 299

From Of Temperance and Patience (1654) 300

From Of Life and Death (1654) 305

From Primitive Holiness (1654) 307

From Hermetical Physic (1655) 322

From Cerbyd Fechydwiaeth (1657) 323

From Humane Industry (1661) 324

NOTES TO VOL. II 329

LIST OF FIRST LINES 355

BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE.

Recent inquiries into the life of Henry Vaughan have added but little to

the information already contained in the memoirs of Mr. Lyte and Dr.

Grosart. I have, however, been enabled to put together a few notes on

this somewhat obscure subject, which may be taken as supplementary to

Mr. Beeching's _Introduction_ in Vol. I. It will be well to preface them

by reprinting the account of Anthony a Wood, our chief original

authority (_Ath. Oxon._, ed. Bliss, 1817, iv. 425):

"Henry Vaughan, called the _Silurist_ from that part of Wales whose

inhabitants were in ancient times called Silures, brother twin (but

elder)[1] to Eugenius Philalethes, alias Tho. Vaughan ... was born at

Newton S. Briget, lying on the river Isca, commonly called Uske, in

Brecknockshire, educated in grammar learning in his own country for six

years under one Matthew Herbert, a noted schoolmaster of his time, made

his first entry into Jesus College in Mich. term 1638, aged 17 years;

where spending two years or more in logicals under a noted tutor, was

taken thence and designed by his father for the obtaining of some

knowledge in the municipal laws at London. But soon after the civil war

beginning, to the horror of all good men, he was sent for home, followed

the pleasant paths of poetry and philology, became noted for his

ingenuity, and published several specimens thereof, of which his _Olor

Iscanus_ was most valued. Afterwards applying his mind to the study of

physic, became at length eminent in his own country for the practice

thereof, and was esteemed by scholars an ingenious person, but proud and

humorous.... [A list of Vaughan's works follows.] ... He died in the

latter end of April (about the 29th day) in sixteen hundred ninety and

five, and was buried in the parish church of Llansenfreid, about two

miles distant from Brecknock, in Brecknockshire."

Anthony a Wood seems to have had some personal acquaintance with the

poet, for in his account of Thomas Vaughan (_Ath. Oxon._ iii. 725) he

says that "Olor Iscanus sent me a catalogue of his brother's works."

(a) THE VAUGHAN GENEALOGY.

Henry Vaughan's descent from the Vaughans of Tretower, County Brecon,

has been accurately traced by Dr. Grosart and others. Little has been

hitherto known about his immediate family. Theophilus Jones, in his

_History of Brecknockshire_ (1805-9), ii. 544, says: "Henry Vaughan died

in 1695, aged 75,[2] leaving by his first wife two sons and three

daughters, and by his second a daughter Rachel, who married John

Turberville. His grand-daughter, Denys, or Dyenis, a corruption or

abbreviation of Dyonisia, who was the daughter of Jenkin Jones of

Trebinshwn, by Luce his wife, died single in 1780, aged 92, and is

buried in the Priory churchyard.[3] What became of the remainder of his

family, or whether they are extinct, I know not." To this statement Mr.

Lyte added nothing but some errors, and Dr. Grosart nothing but the

following hypothesis:--

"I am inclined to think that William Vaughan, censor of the College of

Physicians, physician to William III^d., was one of the sons of our

worthy mentioned by Mr. Lyte.... William Vaughan's 'age 20' in 1668

represents 1648 as the birth-date, and that fits in with the love-verse

of the Poems of 1646."

Mr. G. T. Clark, in his _Genealogies of Glamorgan_, p. 240, gives the

following account:--

Henry [Vaughan], ob. 1695, aet. 75, father by first wife of (1) a son,

s.p.; (2) Lucy ob. 29 Aug., 1780, aet. 92,[4] m. Jenkin Jones of

Trebinshwn. Their d. Denise Jones, died single, 1780, aet. 92. By second

wife (3) Rachel, m. John Turberville; (4) Edmund; (5) Alexander, ob.

1622 [!], s.p.; (6) Catharine, m. Wm. Harris; (7) Mary, m. John

Walbeoffe of Llanhamlach; (8) Elizabeth, m. John Arnold; (9) Frances, m.

Wm. Johns of Cwm Dhu.

Unfortunately Mr. Clark is unable to remember his authority for this

pedigree. I have found another, which differs from it in many ways, and

is exceedingly interesting, inasmuch as it gives, for the first time,

the names of Henry Vaughan's two wives, who appear to have been sisters.

It is in a volume of _Brecknockshire Pedigrees_ collected by the Welsh

Herald, Hugh Thomas, and now amongst the Harleian MSS. Hugh Thomas was

born and lived hard by Llansantffread, and must have known Vaughan and

his family personally.

PEDIGREE OF VAUGHAN OF TRETOWER AND NEWTON.

(From Harl. MS. 2289, f. 81.)

Thomas m. Denis, d. and h. to Gwillims of Newton Skethrog.

|

Henry, of Newton.

|

Henry, of Newton Skethrog, Doctor of Phisick, m.

Catharine, d. to Charles Wise, of Ritsonhall,

Staffordshire, and secondly Elizabeth, her sister.

| |

Lucy, m. Ch. Greenleafe of Grisill, m. Roger Prosser.

Streton-upon-Trent, Staff.

Lucy, m. Jenkin Jones of Trebinshwn.

Catharine, m. Rachel, m. John Turberville

Tho. Vaughan, of Newton of Llangattock.

Skethrog, m. Frances, Henry, Parson of Penderin,

d. to m. Janet, d. of Robert

Walbeoffe of Talyllyn.

It will be observed that neither Mr. Clark's pedigree nor Hugh Thomas'

agrees with the number of children assigned to each marriage by

Theophilus Jones, and that neither of them helps out Dr. Grosart's

hypothesis that Dr. William Vaughan was a son of the poet. Mr. W. B. Rye

(_Genealogist_, iii. 33) has made it appear likely that this Dr.

Vaughan, who married Anne Newton, of Romford in Essex, belonged to a

branch of the Vaughans who had been settled in Romford since 1571.

I now proceed to confirm and illustrate the pedigrees by giving such

further facts concerning Vaughan's immediate family as I have been able

with Miss Morgan's assistance, to glean. I can trace no family of Wises

in Staffordshire so early as the seventeenth century, nor any place in

that county called Ritsonhall. It is possible that the R. W. of the

_Elegy_ (vol. ii., p. 79, _note_) may have been a Wise, and also that

the connection between Vaughan and the Staffordshire Egertons may have

been through this family (vol. ii., p. 294, _note_). Vaughan's first

wife Catharine was probably dead before 1658. Thomas Vaughan, in his

diary (MS. Sloane, 1741, f. 106 (b)), makes mention in that year of

"eyewater made at the Pinner of Wakefield by my dear wife and my Sister

Vaughan, who are both now with God." The second wife, Elizabeth,

survived her husband. Administration of his goods was granted to her as

the widow of an intestate in May, 1695.[5] The fine old manor-house at

Newton was pulled down by a stupid land-agent within the memory of man,

but a stone has been found built into the wall of a house half-a-mile

from the site, bearing the inscription "H^VE, 1689." This may well

stand for H[enry and] E[lizabeth] V[aughan]. Newton probably passed to

the poet's eldest son Thomas and his wife Frances.[6] Of their

descendants, if any, we know nothing. There was a William Vaughan of

Llansantffread who, later than 1714, married Mary Games of Tregaer in

Llanfrynach. But this was probably a Vaughan not of Newton, but of

Scethrog, also in Llansantffread (_cf._ footnote to p. xxv. below.) In

1733 William Vaughan was churchwarden of Llanfrynach. In 1740 William

Vaughan of Tregaer was high sheriff of Brecknock. In 1760 Tregaer had

passed by purchase to a Mr. Phillips. The registers of Llanfrynach from

1695-1756 are now lost. Lucy Greenleafe and her sister Catharine are

quite obscure. One of them may have been the niece who was living with

Thomas Vaughan when news came from the country in 1658 of his father's

death (MS. Sloane, 1741, f. 89 (b)). Of the second family, Henry became

Rector of Penderin in 1684, and vacated the living, probably through

death, in 1713. A tablet to his memory hung during the present century

in the church at Penderin, but when the church was restored the tablets

were taken down and buried under the tiles of the chancel. His wife, a

Walbeoffe of Talyllyn, belonged to the same family as the Walbeoffes of

Llanhamlach (vol. ii., p. 189, _note_). The eldest girl, Grisill,

married Roger Prosser. The Prossers were the younger branch of a

Brecknockshire family who had become sadlers and mercers in Brecon. Many

of their tombs are in the Priory church, but Theophilus Jones states

that by his time they were extinct. Grisill Prosser was married a second

time, in 1709, to Morgan Watkins, an attorney, and was buried on August

21, 1737. The second girl, Lucy, married Jenkin Jones of Trebinshwn, a

cousin of Colonel Jenkin Jones, the local Parliamentary leader. Her

daughter, Denise Jones, died single in 1780, as Theophilus Jones states,

and her tombstone in the Priory church records her descent. The third

girl, Rachel, married John Turberville, one of the Turbervilles of

Llangattock, who claimed kinship with the Elizabethan poet of that name.

The following pedigree shows the descendants of the three daughters of

Henry Vaughan's second marriage, so far as they can be traced.[7]

Henry Vaughan = 2. Elizabeth Wise.

_________________|____________________

| | |

1. Roger =Grisill ...=2. Morgan Lucy=Jenkin Rachel=John

Prosser,| Watkins, |Jones, |Turberville

Mercer. | Attorney. |of Trebinshwn. |of Llangattock.

| | |

_______|___ | Richard = Mary----?

| | | of Llamwyse |

Walter, Elizabeth = Morgan Denise and Glan y |

bapt. 1693. bapt. 1686. | Davies, nat. 1688, rhyd, ob. |

| mercer, o.s.p. 29 1720. |

| ob. 1727. Aug., 1780. |

| |

| John.

_________________|_________________ |

| | | |

Thomas Morgan, Elizabeth, |

bapt. 8 July, bapt. 4 April, |

1720, 1725, |

sep. 20 Nov., sep. 6 July, |

1737. 1730. Margaret,

o.s.p. 1765.

It will be seen that I can give no evidence of the existence of any

living descendants of Henry Vaughan.

Henry's grandfather, Thomas Vaughan, a younger son of Charles Vaughan of

Tretower, seems to have come into the possession of Newton through his

marriage with an heiress of the family of Gwillims or Williams. Newton,

or in Welsh Trenewydd, is a farm of about 200 acres in the manor or

lordship, and near the village of Scethrog, both being in the parish of

Llansantffread and hundred of Penkelley. Williams is a common name in

Breconshire, and I cannot trace the descent of Thomas Vaughan's wife. In

the sixteenth century Newton belonged to a family who finally settled on

the name of Howel, ap Howell or Powell.[8] The last of these is

described on his tombstone in Llansantffread Church as "David Morgan

David Howel, who married ... William of Llanhamoloch: and they had issue

one daughter called Denys. He died 2nd June, 1598." Perhaps Newton

passed in some way from David Morgan David Howel to his wife's family,

and so to Thomas Vaughan, who married Denise Gwillims. Theophilus Jones

(ii. 538) records that at a later date other Williams's, also

apparently connected with Llanhamlach, were succeeded by other Vaughans

at Scethrog, hard by Newton. His account is that David Williams,

youngest brother of Sir Thomas Williams of Eltham, married a daughter of

John Walbeoffe of Llanhamlach (_cf._ pedigree in vol. ii., p. 189,

_note_), and bought Scethrog. Their son Charles died without issue, and

the property passed to his wife Mary (Anne in Harl. MS., 2289, t. 39;

_cf._ vol. ii., p. 204, _note_), the daughter of Morgan John of

Wenallt.... She afterwards married Hugh Powell, clerk, parson of

Llansanffread and precentor of St. David's, and her daughter Margaret

married Charles Vaughan, son to Vaughan Morgan of Tretower.[9]

A trace of Thomas Vaughan is probably preserved in a window-head from

the old church of Llansantffread, now destroyed, which has the

inscription:--

1626. E. G. T. V. W. T.

W. F. I. [bold reversed 'D'].

T. V. may stand for T[homas] V[aughan].[10]

Of Henry Vaughan, the poet's father, very little is known. His name

appears in a list of Breconshire magistrates for 1620. And we learn from

Thomas Vaughan's diary in Sloane MS. 1741, f. 89 (b), that he died in

August 1658.

The only additional definite fact which I can here record of the poet

himself is that in 1691 he entered a caveat against any institution to

the vicarage of Llandevalley, he claiming the next presentation under a

grant from William Winter, Esq.[11] Mr. Rye has shown that the specimen

of handwriting facsimiled by Dr. Grosart in his edition of Henry

Vaughan's _Works_ cannot possibly be the poet's. The signatures,

however, on the margin of a copy of _Olor Iscanus_, once in the library

of Lady Isham, might be genuine.

(b) VAUGHAN AND JESUS COLLEGE, OXFORD.

Anthony a Wood's statement as to Vaughan's residence at Jesus College,

Oxford, has been generally accepted, but I venture to doubt it on the

following grounds:--

(1) Vaughan's name does not occur in the University Matriculation

Register, although his brother Thomas Vaughan is duly entered as

matriculating from Jesus on 14th December, 1638. The only College

records which help us are the Battel-books for 1638 and 1640. That for

1639 is unfortunately missing. The Rev. Llewellyn Thomas kindly informs

me that he can only trace one undergraduate Vaughan in the two books in

question. The Christian name is not given, but I think that we must

assume it to be Thomas.

(2) Vaughan does not describe himself on any title-page as of Jesus

College; nor does he ever speak of himself as an Oxford man. This

omission is the more noticeable as he would naturally have done so in

the lines _Ad Posteros_ (vol. ii., p. 51), and might well have done so

in those _On Sir Thomas Bodley's Library, the Author being then in

Oxford_ (vol. ii., p. 197).

(3) Anthony a Wood cannot be depended on. He describes Thomas Carew, for

instance, as of C.C.C., whereas he was a most certainly of Merton. And

there was another Henry Vaughan of Jesus, who may have been confused

with the poet. This Henry Vaughan, a son of John Vaughan of Cathlin,

Merionethshire, matriculated at Oriel on July 4, 1634. He afterwards

became a Scholar and Fellow of Jesus, taking his B.A. in 1637 and his

M.A. in 1639. In 1643 he became vicar of Penteg, co. Monmouth, and died

at Abergavenny in 1661. (Wood, _Ath. Oxon._, iii. 531; Foster, _Alumni

Oxon._)

(4) The only confirmation of Anthony a Wood's statement is the poem

(vol. ii., p. 289) taken by Dr. Grosart from the _Eucharistica

Oxoniensia_ (1641), and signed "H. Vaughan, Jes. Col." If I am right,

this may be by Vaughan's namesake. He has indeed another poem in that

volume signed "Hen. Vaugh., Jes. Soc." but that is in Latin, and it is

not unexampled for one man to contribute more than one poem, especially

in different tongues, to such collections. Or it may be by Herbert

Vaughan, who was a Gentleman-commoner of the College in 1641, and has,

with Henry Vaughan the Fellow, verses in the [Greek: proteleia] _Anglo

Batava_ of the same year.

(c) VAUGHAN IN THE CIVIL WAR.

There are several passages which make it probable that Vaughan, like his

brother Thomas, bore arms on the King's side in the Civil War. The most

important is in the poem _To Mr. Ridsley_ (vol. ii., p. 83), where he

speaks of the time

"when this juggling fate

Of soldiery first seiz'd me."

In the same poem he mentions

"that day, when we

Left craggy Biston and the fatal Dee."

"Craggy Biston" is clearly Beeston Castle, one of the outlying defences

of Chester, situated on a steep rock not very far east of the Dee. This

castle was besieged on several occasions during the Civil War,

especially during the campaign of 1645, when Chester was also besieged

by the Parliamentarians.[12] Between Beeston and the Dee was fought, on

September 24, 1645, the battle of Rowton Heath, after which Charles the

First, who had hoped to raise the siege of Chester, was obliged to

retreat to Denbigh.[13] The following lines from Vaughan's _Elegy on Mr.

R. W._ (vol. ii., p. 79), who fell in that battle, seem to have been

written by an eye-witness:

"O that day

When like the fathers in the fire and cloud

I miss'd thy face! I might in ev'ry crowd

See arms like thine, and men advance, but none

So near to lightning mov'd, nor so fell on.

Have you observ'd how soon the nimble eye

Brings th' object to conceit, and doth so vie

Performance with the soul, that you would swear

The act and apprehension both lodg'd there?

Just so mov'd he: like shot his active hand

Drew blood, ere well the foe could understand.

But here I lost him."

This appears to me pretty conclusive evidence; against it, however, must

be set the passage on the Civil War in the autobiographical poem _Ad

Posteros_ (vol. ii., p. 51).

Vixi, divisos cum fregerat haeresis Anglos

Inter Tysiphonas presbyteri et populi.

His primum miseris per amoena furentibus arva

Prostravit sanctam vilis avena rosam.

Turbarunt fontes, et fusis pax perit undis,

Moestaque coelestes obruit umbra dies.

Duret ut integritas tamen, et pia gloria, partem

Me nullam in tanta strage fuisse, scias;

Credidimus nempe insonti vocem esse cruori,

Et vires quae post funera flere docent.

Hinc castae, fidaeque pati me more parentis

Commonui, et lachrimis fata levare meis;

Hinc nusquam horrendis violavi sacra procellis,

Nec mihi mens unquam, nec manus atra fuit.

The natural interpretation of this certainly is that Vaughan took no

share in the disturbances of his time, except to grieve over them in

retirement. Yet, in the first place, the lines may have been written

before he took up arms in 1645, and, in the second, they may only mean

that he had no share in _bringing about_ the troubles of England, or in

shedding _innocent_ blood. Similarly when elsewhere, as in _Abel's

Blood_ (vol. i. p. 254), and in the prayer to be quoted below, he

expresses horror of blood-guiltiness, this need not necessarily be taken

as extending to the man who fights in a righteous cause.

Miss Morgan, I may add, suggests that Vaughan was at Rowton Heath, not

as a combatant, but as a physician. The description which he gives of

the battle reads like that of a man who saw it from some commanding

point of view, but was not himself engaged. I think it not improbable

that Vaughan was one of the garrison of Beeston Castle, which is

described to me as "a sort of grand stand for the battle-field." Beeston

Castle was invested by the Parliamentarians in the course of September

1645. On the approach of Charles the troops were drawn off on 19th

September to Chester.[14] Charles no doubt took the opportunity to

strengthen the garrison. After Rowton Heath Beeston Castle was again

besieged, and on November 16th it surrendered. The garrison were allowed

to march across the Dee to Denbigh. I think that this winter ride from

the fallen fortress is the one described by Vaughan in the poem to Mr.

Ridsley. It is the more probable that Vaughan took part in this campaign

of 1645, in that Charles's force was largely recruited from Wales. After

the battle of Naseby on June 14th, the King had marched through Wales,

collecting such levies as he could. He was in Brecon on August 5th.[15]

It is quite possible that Vaughan, whose kinsman Sir William Vaughan was

in command of a brigade, volunteered on this occasion. From Brecon

Charles marched through Radnorshire, Shropshire, Staffordshire,

Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire, Yorkshire, and so to Oxford. In September

he set out again, and after some delay at Hereford and Raglan, finally

made for Chester.

It is just conceivable that it is to some occasion in this campaign that

Vaughan refers when he calls Dr. Powell his "fellow-prisoner" (vol. ii.,

p. 178). The poet may even have been the Captain Vaughan whose name

appears in the official list of prisoners taken at Rowton Heath.[16]

Powell's name is not there, but then the list does not profess to be

complete. But on the whole I think that Vaughan and Powell were only

fellow-prisoners in the Platonic sense of imprisonment in the flesh, and

even if a literal imprisonment is intended, it may have been due to some

act of persecution which Vaughan had to suffer as a Royalist at a later

date. There is in _The Mount of Olives_ (1652) a _Prayer in Adversity

and Troubles occasioned by our Enemies_ (Grosart, vol. iii., p. 75),

which, if it is to be taken--I think it is not--as autobiographical,

seems to show that, at least for a time, he lost his estate. The prayer

runs: "Thou seest, O God, how furious and implacable mine enemies are:

they have not only robbed me of that portion and provision which Thou

hast graciously given me, but they have also washed their hands in the

blood of my friends, my dearest and nearest relations. I know, O God,

and I am daily taught by that disciple whom Thou didst love, that no

murderer hath eternal life abiding in him. Keep me, therefore, O my

God, from the guilt of blood, and suffer me not to stain my soul with

the thoughts of recompense and vengeance, which is a branch of Thy great

prerogative, and belongs wholly unto Thee. Though they persecute me unto

death, and pant after the very dust upon the heads of Thy poor, though

they have taken the bread out of Thy children's mouth, and have made me

a desolation; yet, Lord, give me Thy grace, and such a measure of

charity as may fully forgive them."

It may have been during some such time of trouble, or imprisonment, if

imprisonment there was, that Vaughan's wife lived with Thomas Vaughan,

as will be seen below, in London.

(d) THOMAS VAUGHAN.

It has not been thought necessary to reprint in this edition of Henry

Vaughan's poems the scanty English and Latin verses of his brother,

Thomas Vaughan. They may be found, together with verses by Virgil and

Campion ascribed to him, in vol. ii. of Dr. Grosart's _Fuller Worthies_

edition. But some account of so curious a person will not be out of

place.

As for his brother, our chief authority is Anthony a Wood (_Ath. Oxon._,

iii. 722), who says that he was the son of Thomas Vaughan of

Llansantffread,[17] that he was born in 1621, educated under Matthew

Herbert and at Jesus College, Oxford, of which he became Fellow, took

orders and received [in 1640] the living of Llansanffread from his

kinsman, Sir George Vaughan [of Fallerstone, Wilts]. He lost his living

in the unquiet times of the Civil War, retired to Oxford, and became an

eminent chemist, afterwards moving to London, where he worked under the

patronage of Sir Robert Murray. He was a great admirer of Cornelius

Agrippa, "a great chymist, a noted son of the fire, an experimental

philosopher, a zealous brother of the Rosicrucian fraternity ... neither

papist nor sectary, but a true resolute protestant in the best sense of

the Church of England." In the great plague he fled with Murray from

London to Oxford, and thence went to the house of Samuel Kem at Albury,

where he died on February 27, 1665/6, of mercury accidentally getting

into his nose while he was operating. He was buried at Albury on March

1st. Writing in 1673, Anthony a Wood gives a list of his alchemical and

mystical treatises published between 1650 and 1655. Of these he had

received a list from Olor Iscanus (Henry Vaughan). They all bear the

name of Eugenius Philalethes, except the _Aula Lucis_ (1652), which was

issued as by S. N., _i.e._ [Thoma]S [Vaugha]N. Some of these pamphlets

contain Vaughan's share of a vigorous and scurrilous controversy with

Henry More, the Platonist. Anthony a Wood distinguishes from Vaughan

another Eugenius Philalethes, author of the _Brief Natural History_

(1669), also one Eirenaeus Philalethes, author of _Ripley Redivivus_ and

other works, and Eirenaeus Philoponos Philalethes, author of _The Marrow

of Alchemy_ (1654-5).[18]

A few facts, from well-known sources, may be added to Anthony a Wood's

account. The University Registers show that "Thos. Vaughan, son of

Thomas of Llansanfraid, co. Brecon, pleb., matriculated from Jesus

College on 14 Dec, 1638, aged 16." He took his B.A. on 18 Feb., 1641/2,

but does not appear to have taken his M.A., though he became Fellow of

his College (Foster, _Alumni Oxon._). John Walker (_Sufferings of the

Clergy_ (1714), p. 389) states that he was ejected from his living on

the charges of "drunkenness, immorality, and bearing arms for the

King."[19] This must have been in 1649, under the Act for the

Propagation of the Gospel in Wales. There exists a letter from Thomas

Vaughan to a friend in London, dated from "Newtown, Ash Wednesday,

1653;"[20] and it appears from Jones' _History of Brecknockshire_ (ii.,

542), that at one time he lived with his brother Henry there. The

allusions to Henry More, to Murray, and to the Isis and Thames seem to

show that he is the Daphnis of his brother's _Eclogue_ (vol. ii., p.

278). No trace of his death or burial can however be now found at

Albury. Mr. Gordon Goodwin points out to me that Dr. Samuel Kem was a

somewhat notorious character (_Dict. Nat. Biog._, s.v. _Kem_): perhaps

this friendship, together with the personal confession quoted below,

throws light on the charges which lost Vaughan his living. On the other

hand Anthony a Wood speaks well of him, and the tone of his writings

bears out this more kindly judgment, at any rate so far as his later

years are concerned.

What has been said fairly well exhausted the available information on

Thomas Vaughan until a few years ago, when Mr. A. E. Waite discovered in

Sloane MS. 1741 a valuable manuscript of his, containing amongst other

things a number of autobiographical memoranda. He printed some extracts

from this in the preface to an edition of some of _The Magical Writings

of Thomas Vaughan_ (Redway, 1888), and has been kind enough to furnish

me with a reference to the MS. itself, which I have carefully examined.

It bears the title _Aqua Vitae non Vitis_, and the inscription "Ex

libris Thomas et Rebecca Vaughan, 1651, Sept. 28. Quos Deus coniunxit

quis separabit?" The contents are partly personal jottings and records

of dreams, partly alchemical formulae. They appear to cover the period

1658-1662. We learn from them the following facts:--Vaughan was married

on September 28, 1651, to a lady named Rebecca (f. 106 (b)). With her

and his "Sister Vaughan" he lived and studied alchemy at the Pinner of

Wakefield.[21] He had previously lodged at Mr. Coalman's in Holborn (f.

104 (b)). His wife died on Saturday, April 17, 1658, and was buried at

Mappersall, in Bedfordshire (f. 106 (b)).[22] In 1658 his father and his

brother W. were both dead, and he mentions the news of his father's

death coming to his niece in a letter from the country (f. 89 (b)). On

April 9, 1659, he saw his brother H. in a dream. On 16 July, 1658, he

was living at Wapping (f. 103 (b)), and at an earlier period at

Paddington. There is an inventory of his wife's goods left at Mrs.

Highgate's, and mention of a Mr. Highgate and a Sir John Underhill (f.

107). He names his cousin, Mr. J. Walbeoffe, with whom he had some money

transactions (f. 18), and speaks of "a certain person with whom I had in

former times revelled away my years in drinking" (f. 103). Perhaps this

also was John Walbeoffe, on whom _see_ vol. ii., p. 189, _note_. The

alchemical formulae and receipts are interesting. In one place (f. 12)

Vaughan announces the discovery of the "Extract of Oil of Halcaly,"

which he had previously found in his wife's days and had lost again.

This he calls "the greatest joy I can ever have in this world after her

death." He seems to have regarded it as the key to an universal solvent.

Nearly every receipt is followed by his and his wife's initials in the

form T. R. V. or T. ^V. R., and by some expression of devotion to her or

of religious piety.

I now come to the remarkable statements made with respect to Thomas

Vaughan in the _Memoires d'une ex-Palladiste_, now in course of

publication by Miss Diana Vaughan. Miss Vaughan is a lady who has

created a considerable sensation in Paris. Her own account of herself is

that she was brought up as a worshipper of Lucifer, and was for some

years a leading spirit amongst certain androgynous lodges of Freemasons,

in which the worship of Lucifer is largely practised. She has now, owing

to the direct interposition of Joan of Arc, become a Catholic, and has

made it her mission to combat Luciferian Freemasonry in every way. Her

_Memoirs_ are partly a biography, partly an account of this cult.[23]

Miss Vaughan claims to be a great-grand-daughter of Thomas Vaughan's.

She declares him to have been a Luciferian, Grand-master of the

Rosicrucian order, and the founder of modern Freemasonry; and gives an

exhaustive account of his career on the authority of family archives.

The following paragraphs contain the substance of her narrative, the

"legend of Philalethes," as it was told to Miss Vaughan by her father

and her uncle, who were intimate friends of Albert Pike.

The traditional accounts of Thomas Vaughan, says Miss Vaughan, contain

serious errors. The dates of his birth and of his death, and the

pseudonym under which he wrote are all incorrectly stated[24] (p. 110).

He was born in Monmouth in 1612, being two years the elder of his

brother Henry. The two boys were brought up at Oxford, after their

father's death, by their uncle, Robert Vaughan the antiquary,[25] and

entered at Jesus College (p. 114). In 1636, at the age of 24, Thomas

Vaughan went to London, and became the disciple of Robert Fludd, who was

a Rosicrucian (p. 148). The real nature of the Rosicrucians has hitherto

been a mystery. They were in reality Luciferians, and carried on in

secret during the seventeenth century that warfare against Adonai, the

god of the Catholics, out of which had already sprung Wiclif, Luther,

and the Reformation, and out of which was some day to spring, more

deadly and more dangerous still, Freemasonry. The Fraternity of

Rosie-Cross was founded by Faustus Socinus in 1597. He was succeeded as

head of it by Caesar Cremonini (1604-1617), Michael Maier (1617-1622),

Valentin Andreae (1622-1654), and Thomas Vaughan (1654-1678).[26] When

Thomas Vaughan first came to London in 1636, Valentin Andreae was

_Summus Magister_ of the Fraternity, and amongst its leading members

were Robert Fludd and Amos Komenski, or Comenius (pp. 129-148). Robert

Fludd initiated Thomas Vaughan into the lower degrees of the Golden

Cross (p. 148), and sent him to Andreae at Calw, near Stuttgart, with a

letter in which he prophesied for him a miraculous future (p. 163).

After this visit to Germany, Vaughan returned to London, and after

Fludd's death, in 1637, undertook in 1638 his first visit to America. In

many of his writings he speaks as a Christian minister, and at this time

he probably passed as a Nonconformist (p. 164). He was back in London

early in June, 1639 (p. 165), and in the same year visited Denmark, and

made a report to Komenski on the mysterious golden horn found at Tondern

in that country (p. 166). In 1640 Vaughan received from Komenski the

first initiation of the Rosie Cross, and chose the pseudonym of

Eirenaeus Philalethes.[27] He now became exceedingly active, going and

coming upon the face of the earth. When in England, he divided his time

between Oxford and London (p. 167). Between 1640 and 1644 he visited

Hamburg, the Netherlands, Italy and Sweden (pp. 171-174). It was at this

period that he conceived the design of obtaining a far wider circulation

than they had yet met with for the ideas of Faustus Socinus. Some of the

Rosicrucians were already "accepted masons." Vaughan determined to

capture the vast organization of craft masonry by permeating the lodges

with Luciferianism. His associate in this task was Elias Ashmole, with

whose aid, a few years later, he composed the degrees of Apprentice

(1646), Companion (1648), and Master (1649) (pp. 142, 169-175, 197-206).

The Civil War had now approached. Oliver Cromwell was a freemason, a

Rosicrucian, and a friend of Vaughan's (p. 176). With the execution of

Laud came the crisis of Vaughan's life, his initiation into the highest

degree of Rosie Cross by the hands of Lucifer himself. It took place in

this wise. At the last moment Vaughan was substituted for the intended

executioner of Laud.[28] He had prepared a sacramental cloth which he

soaked in the martyr's blood, and on the same night he sacrificed the

relic to Lucifer. The divinity appeared, consecrated Vaughan as

_Magus_, named him as the next _Summus Magister_ of the Fraternity, and

signed a pact, granting him thirty-three years more life, at the end of

which he should be borne away from earth without death (p. 177). In 1645

Vaughan wrote, but did not yet publish, his most important treatise, the

_Introitus Apertus ad Occlusum Regis Palatium_. In 1645, still following

the direct command of Lucifer, he departed for America. Here he met the

apothecary George Starkey, and in his presence performed the alchemical

feat of making gold (p. 179).[29] Here, too, he lived amongst the

Lenni-Lennaps, where he was united to the demon Venus-Astarte in the

form of a beautiful woman, who after eleven days bore him a daughter.

This girl was brought up among the Lenni-Lennaps under the name of Diana

Wulisso-Waghan, and became Miss Diana Vaughan's great-great-grandmother

(p. 181). In 1648 Vaughan returned to England, and after composing the

masonic degree of Master in 1649 (p. 197), he began the publication of

a series of alchemical and, in reality, Luciferian writings. In 1650

appeared the _Anthroposophia Theomagica_ and the _Magia Adamica_, in

1651 the _Lumen de Lumine_; in 1652 the _Aula Lucis_ (p. 211). In 1654

Valentin Andreae died, and Vaughan succeeded him as _Summus Magister_ of

the Rosie Cross, the event being announced to him by the homage of three

demons, Leviathan, Cerberus, and Belphegor (p. 214). In 1655 he

published his _Euphrates_, and in 1656 made his head-quarters at

Amsterdam or Eirenaeopolis. In 1659 came his _Fraternity of R. C._; in

1664 his _Medulla Alchymiae_.[30] In 1666 he exhibited the philosopher's

stone to Helvetius at La Haye and converted him to occultism: in 1667 he

at last resolved to publish his Opus Magnum, the _Introitus Apertus_,

already written in 1645 (p. 215). In 1668 this was followed by the

_Experimenta de Praeparatione Mercurii Sophici_ and the _Tractatus Tres_

(p. 236). The time was now approaching when Vaughan, in fulfilment of

the pact of 1644, must disappear from earth. He named Charles Blount as

his successor (p. 237), and was granted a magical vision of his

grandson, the child of Diana Wulisso-Waghan and a Lenni-Lennap (p. 239).

He finished his _Memoirs_, published the _Ripley Revised_[31] and the

_Enarratio Methodica trium Gebri Medicinarum_, left his poems to his

brother Henry, who published them in the next year as the _Thalia

Rediviva_,[32] and on March 25, 1678, disappeared in the company of

_Lucifer Dieu-Bon_ himself (p. 240). This event is vouched for, not only

by a written statement of Henry Vaughan (p. 114), but also by the

existence in a masonic triangle at Valetta of a magical talisman into

which, when properly evoked, the spirit of Philalethes enters and

records his glorious end for the edification of the Luciferians

present[33] (p. 243).

I fear that I have taken Miss Vaughan with undue seriousness. Her

account of Thomas Vaughan is not only unsupported by direct

evidence,[34] but much of it is of a character which we should not be

justified in accepting, even were direct evidence forthcoming. And it is

all discordant with the little that we do happen to know of Thomas

Vaughan from other sources. The whole thing is, in fact, a pretty

obvious romance of very modern fabrication. It appears to have been

compiled from such information as to the alchemical and mystical writers

of the seventeenth century as was within the reach of Albert Pike and

the brothers Vaughan about the year 1870.[35] It is always better to

explain than to refute an error; and the nature of the Luciferian

tradition of Thomas Vaughan is pretty clearly shown by the fact that it

is not corroborated in a single particular by any of the new facts about

him that have come to light since this probable date of its

composition.[36] The fabricator put Thomas Vaughan's birth-place in

Monmouth instead of Brecon, because he had never seen Dr. Grosart's

_Fuller Worthies_ Edition of Henry Vaughan. He makes no mention of any

of the facts contained in Sloane MS. 1741, because that MS. was still

unknown. And, most fatal of all, he puts Thomas Vaughan's birth in 1612

instead of 1621-2, because Foster's _Alumni Oxonienses_ being yet

unpublished, he was ignorant of the record of that date preserved in the

University Registers. But we can go a step further. We can confute him,

not only by pointing to the books he did not use, but by pointing to

those he did. It has already been shown that the ascription to Vaughan

of the English translation of Maier's _Themis Aurea_ is due to a

misunderstanding of a phrase used by Anthony a Wood. The _Athenae

Oxonienses_ then was one source of the compilation. Another was the

_Histoire de la Philosophie Hermetique_, written by Lenglet-Dufresnoy in

1742. Here is the proof. Miss Vaughan supports her statement as to the

birth-date in 1612 by a quotation from the _Introitus Apertus_, in which

the writer states it to have been composed "en l'an 1645 de notre salut,

et le trente-troisieme de mon age." This she professes to translate from

the _editio princeps_ published by Jean Lange in 1667. As a matter of

fact it is taken from the version given in Lenglet-Dufresnoy's book. And

Lenglet-Dufresnoy followed, not the edition of 1667, but the later

edition published by J. M. Faust at Frankfort in 1706. In this the words

are "trigesimo tertio," whereas in the _editio princeps_ they are

"vicesimo tertio," and in W. Cooper's English translation of 1669, "in

the 23rd year of my age," thus bringing the date of the birth of

Eirenaeus Philalethes not to 1612, but to 1622. The "legend of

Philalethes" need detain us no longer. Miss Vaughan's narrative is a

very insufficient basis for regarding the pious minister and mystic

which Thomas Vaughan appears to have been as a secret enemy of

Christianity and a worshipper of Lucifer.

But when the legend is set aside, there still remain certain questions

suggested by it which may be considered without much reference to the

statements of Miss Vaughan. Was Thomas Vaughan a Rosicrucian? And was

he, admittedly the author of a series of tracts under the name of

Eugenius Philalethes, also the author of those which bear the name of

Eirenaeus Philalethes? The first question is, I am afraid, insoluble,

until it has been decided whether the Fraternity of R. C. ever had an

actual existence. Anthony a Wood states that Thomas Vaughan was a

zealous Rosicrucian, but probably Anthony a Wood took the term in the

general sense of mystic and alchemist. On the other hand Vaughan

himself, in his preface to the English translation of the Rosicrucian

manifestoes, seems to disavow any personal acquaintance with the members

of the fraternity. Even this is not conclusive, for the Rosicrucian

rule, as given in the _Laws of the Brotherhood_, published by Sincerus

Renatus in 1710,[37] obliges the members to deny their membership.

There is more material for the discussion of the second question, but I

do not know that it is more possible to come to a definite conclusion.

The personality of the anonymous adept who took the name of Eirenaeus

Philalethes was shrouded in mystery even to his contemporaries. The

fullest account given of him on any of his title-pages is on that of the

_Experimenta de Praeparatione Mercurii Sophici_ (1668), which is said to

be "ex manuscripto Philosophi Americani alias Eyrenaei Philalethis,

natu Angli, habitatione Cosmopolitae."[38] We have also the description

given by George Starkey, or whoever it was, in the _Marrow of Alchemy_

(1654-5), p. 25. Starkey says:--

"His present place in which he doth abide

I know not, for the world he walks about,

Of which he is a citizen; this tide

He is to visit artists and seek out

Antiquities a voyage gone and will

Return when he of travel hath his fill.

"By nation an Englishman, of note

His family is in the place where he

Was born, his fortune's good, and eke his coat

Of arms is of a great antiquity;

His learning rare, his years scarce thirty-three;

Fuller description get you not from me."

Poems of Henry Vaughan, Silurist, Volume II · 第 1 / 16 段