CHAPTER XIII

JUNE, 1908

HOW MR. GLADSTONE'S CHALLENGE WAS ACCEPTED. THE PROCESSION OF 13,000

SUFFRAGISTS ON JUNE 13TH. THE GREAT HYDE PARK DEMONSTRATION ON THE

TWENTY-FIRST OF JUNE, AND THE DEMONSTRATION OF PROTEST IN PARLIAMENT

SQUARE ON JUNE 30TH.

The time was now approaching when the women were to take up Mr.

Gladstone's challenge to them to show that they could rival the great

franchise demonstrations which men had held in demanding the three

Reform Acts of 1832, 1867 and 1885. In the Autumn of 1907, long before

the challenge had been made, the Women's Social and Political Union

had determined to hold a record meeting in Hyde Park on Sunday, June

21st, 1908. The greatest meeting that had ever yet been held there

was said to have numbered 72,000, but it was determined that at the

Women's demonstration there must be gathered at least a quarter of a

million people. The organisation of this great project was the work of

many months and a large part of this fell to the share of our devoted

Treasurer, Mrs. Pethick Lawrence, her husband, and Mrs. Drummond who

now began to be called our "general." Mr. Lawrence carefully thought

out the scheme for the seven great processions which were to march

into Hyde Park by seven separate gates. To Mrs. Pethick Lawrence was

primarily due the introduction of the colours, purple, white and green,

which the Union now adopted for its own. The colours at once secured a

most amazing popular success for, although they were not even thought

of until the middle of May, before the month of June arrived they were

known throughout the length and breadth of the land.[27]

As Treasurer of the Union, Mrs. Lawrence bore upon her shoulders

the special responsibility of meeting the very heavy cost of the

demonstration as well as the other great expenses which were now being

incurred; but that magnetic power of hers which had hitherto proved

so invaluable to the movement was as infallible as ever. Whatever the

sum she asked, it was immediately paid down. To make the forthcoming

demonstrations known to everyone an immense poster, measuring thirteen

feet by ten feet, containing the photographs of the twenty women who

were to preside at the twenty platforms from which the audience was to

be addressed, as well as a map showing the route of each of the seven

processions and a plan of the meeting place in Hyde Park was displayed

upon the hoardings in London and all the principal provincial towns

at a cost to the Union of more than £1,000. Our organisers stationed

in various parts of the country arranged for thirty special trains

to run from seventy different towns in order to carry contingents of

women demonstrators from the various provincial centres. At the same

time London itself was systematically organised for the demonstration.

My experiences as organiser of the Chelsea district which included

also Fulham and Wandsworth, are vividly present with me as I write.

At many of the open air pitches from which we then spoke, no Women's

Suffrage meetings had ever been held before, but wherever we went our

experiences were, in their main essentials, always the same. Our first

meeting was, usually, almost wholly a fight to subdue a continued

uproar. On more than one occasion the little box or the chair used as a

platform was overturned by a gang of hooligan youths, and the meeting

had to be abandoned. But, whatever may have happened at the first

meeting in a fresh place, we always found that at the second meeting

the majority of the audience were sympathetic. At the third meeting all

was harmony, and we were generally seen to our homeward trams or busses

by cheering crowds.

Those splendid people, the Suffragettes of Kensington, not only

contrived to carry on a constant campaign of meetings but at the same

time to make all their own banners and bannerettes.

In the meantime the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies,

in conjunction with a number of other organisations, had decided to

organise a women's procession, and on June 13th, a week and a day

before the Hyde Park demonstration, some 13,000 Suffragists assembled

on the Embankment and marched to the Albert Hall where a meeting

was held. It was a striking pageant with its many gorgeous banners,

richly embroidered and fashioned of velvets, silks and every kind of

beautiful material and the small bannerettes showing as innumerable

patches of brilliant and lovely colour, each one varying both in

shape and hue. Seventy of the large banners had been prepared by the

Artists League for Women's Suffrage. Some were blazoned with the

figures of women great in history, amongst them, Boadicea, Joan of

Arc and Queen Elizabeth; others bore emblems commemorating women's

heroic deeds, or reforming achievements,--Elizabeth Fry, Lydia Becker,

and Mary Wollstonecraft, being amongst those recalled. Walking in the

procession were many of Lydia Becker's comrades and contemporaries,

including the aged Miss Emily Davies, Dr. Garrett Anderson, and her

sister, Mrs. Fawcett, the President of the National Union of Suffrage

Societies. After these came a contingent of international Suffragists;

Australians, Americans with their Stars and Stripes headed by Dr.

Anna Shaw, and representatives from Hungary, Russia, South Africa,

and other countries, each with their national flags and colours. The

professional women were led by Mrs. Ayrton and other scientists and

a great band of medical women in their splendid robes of crimson and

black, with hoods of purple, red and blue. Other graduates followed and

the representatives of Newnham and Girton were in great force. Amongst

the women writers, headed by the Scrivener's banner, were Beatrice

Harraden, Elizabeth Robins and Evelyn Sharpe. Then came the artists,

the actresses. Next, the nurses, all in uniform, and, after these, a

host of others, gardeners, pharmacists, physical trainers, typists and

shorthand writers, shop assistants, factory workers, and home-makers.

Next came the militant Women's Freedom League, the Women's Co-operative

Guild, the National Union of Women Workers, and the members of various

women's organisations connected with the political parties including

the Women's Liberal Associations, and the women of the Independent

Labour Party and the Fabian Society. Altogether the procession was

acknowledged to be the most picturesque and effective political pageant

that had ever been seen in this country, and every newspaper spoke of

its impressive dignity and beauty.

Now the Women's Social and Political Union and all whom they could

press into the service were busily engaged on a ten days' crusade

for the winding up of the Hyde Park Demonstration campaign. How the

women worked! They held innumerable meetings; they went out canvassing

from door to door; they stood in the streets with flags and posters;

they distributed handbills broadcast; chalked announcements upon the

pavements and met the workmen's trains to give out little purple,

white and green mock railway tickets, a million of which had been

printed. On the Thursday evening before the Demonstration, Mrs.

Drummond and a dozen other members of the Union set sail for the Houses

of Parliament in a steam launch decorated with banners and posters

announcing the Demonstration. At the little tables on the terrace many

members, including Mr. Lloyd George, were entertaining their lady

friends at afternoon tea, when the sound of a band playing heralded

the Suffragettes' arrival. Everyone crowded to the water's edge as

the boat stopped, and Mrs. Drummond began to speak. She invited all

Members of Parliament, and especially Cabinet Ministers, to join the

women's procession to Hyde Park on the twenty-first of June, assuring

them that it was their duty to inform themselves as to the feelings

of the people. She twitted the Government who were supposed to

be democratic with remaining always behind barred gates under the

protection of the police, and urged, "Come to the Park on Sunday;

you shall have police protection there also, and we promise you that

there shall be no arrests." The Members appeared both pleased and

interested and many more came flocking out to listen, but somebody, a

waiter it was said, hurriedly telephoned to the police and in a few

moments Inspector Scantlebury with a number of officers appeared on the

Terrace, whilst at the same time one of the police boats hove in sight.

Seeing this, the Suffragettes steamed away.

[Illustration: The Head of the Procession to Hyde Park, June 21st, 1908]

On Sunday, the 21st, we were busy early in the morning for the

processions were to start between one and two; the people were

expected to begin to assemble at least a couple of hours before that

time. All London seemed to have turned out to see us, and all along

the Chelsea Embankment, which was thronged with people, were coffee

stands, costermongers, and hawkers selling badges and programmes in

the purple, white and green. When the moment for starting came our

Chelsea procession numbered some seven thousand people, but the dense

crowds of by-standers marched with us too, and grew in a countless

number as we moved along, so that, instead of one procession we had

formed three--the central one being composed almost entirely of women,

wearing white dresses and scarfs of purple, white and green, and

carrying banners in the same colours. The whole road was filled with

people moving with us, and from balconies, windows and tops of busses

people cheered and waved. The same thing was happening in each of the

other six districts. At the head of each procession rode policemen on

horseback and numbers of constables walked on either side of the ranks

in order to keep the way clear. Six thousand police in all accompanied

the seven processions, the police authorities being most helpful and

courteous toward us throughout the arrangements.

In Hyde Park the railings for over a quarter of a square mile had been

taken up for us in order to add a further open space to that which

is usually open in the neighbourhood of the Reformer's Tree. In the

centre of this meeting-ground a furniture van was stationed to serve

as an impromptu Conning Tower. Those who stood there watching saw,

first the fine procession from Marylebone with great crowds marching

in on either side sweep into the quiet grassy space, and then, one

after another, from the seven different gates, the rest of the seven

processions with their accompanying armies come streaming in. Before

we arrived from Chelsea the whole ground was a surging mass of people,

and it was with difficulty that we made our way to the platform which

had been reserved for us. Once we gained it we clambered hastily on

to our lorry and looked around with wondering and astonished gaze.

As far as the eye could reach was one vast mass of human beings--not

black, as crowds usually are,--but coloured, like a great bed of

flowers because of the thousands and thousands of women all dressed

in the lightest and daintiest of summer garments, whilst even the men

had most of them come out in cool greys and were wearing straw hats.

Over the whole of the area there was to be seen not a single blade of

grass. Who could attempt to estimate the number of people that were

present? They were innumerable; they defied calculation and there was

no one of us who had ever imagined that we should see so many people

gathered together. The sky was a perfect blue; the sun poured down on

us; everyone seemed to be in holiday mood, just as they were in holiday

dress, and during the time in which the people waited for the speakers

to begin, perfect good humour reigned. Then bugles were sounded from

the Conning Tower and the speeches at each of the twenty platforms

began.

[Illustration: A Section of the great "Votes for Women" meeting in Hyde

Park on June 21st, 1908]

Probably less than half the people could hear the speakers, but that

was of small account. They had come there to show their sympathy with

Votes for Women and to take part in the greatest demonstration the

world had ever seen, and if they stood there the whole of the afternoon

without catching a single sentence, they had been well rewarded. At

most of the platforms there was nothing but the kindliest sympathy,

except at the platforms of Mrs. Pankhurst and Christabel, where a

number of rowdy and ignorant young men attempted to prevent the

speakers from being heard.

At five o'clock the bugle sounded and the Resolution calling upon the

Government to give votes to women without delay was put and carried at

every platform, in most cases without dissent. Then the bugle was heard

again and the cry, "One, two, three!" and the assembled multitude, as

they had been asked to do, shouted, "Votes for Women!" three times, and

then that great and wonderful gathering began slowly to disperse.

Next morning every newspaper devoted long columns to the

demonstration. In the course of a long descriptive account the Special

Correspondent of the _Times_ said:

Its organisers had counted on an audience of 250,000. That expectation

was certainly fulfilled and probably it was doubled, and it would be

difficult to contradict anyone who asserted that it was trebled. Like

the distances and numbers of the stars, the facts were beyond the

threshold of perception.

The _Standard_ said:

From first to last, it was a great meeting, daringly conceived,

splendidly stage-managed, and successfully carried out. Hyde park has

probably never seen a greater crowd of people.

The _Daily News_ said:

There is no combination of words which will convey an adequate idea of

the immensity of the crowd around the platforms.

The _Daily Express_:

The Women Suffragists provided London yesterday with one of the most

wonderful and astonishing sights that have ever been seen since the

days of Boadicea.... It is probable that so many people never before

stood in one square mass anywhere in England. Men who saw the great

Gladstone meeting years ago said that compared with yesterday's

multitude it was as nothing.

The _Daily Chronicle_ said:

Never, on the admission of the most experienced observers, has so vast

a throng gathered in London to witness an outlay of political force.

[Illustration: Lord Rosebery and other Members of both Houses watching

the Suffragettes' struggle in Parliament Square, June 30th, 1908]

After the great meeting was over, its organisers returned to Clement's

Inn and Christabel Pankhurst immediately wrote to the Prime Minister

forwarding the Resolution: "That this meeting calls upon the Government

to grant votes to women without delay," which had just been carried

by that great gathering. At the same time she asked "what action the

Government would take in response to the demand."

Mr. Asquith replied that he had nothing to add to the statement--the

so-called promise of a Reform Bill, which he had made to the deputation

of Members of Parliament on May 20th.

The wonderful Hyde Park Demonstration, the greatest meeting that had

ever been held, and the impressive procession of the Women's Societies

both of which had been held within a few days' space had therefore, it

seemed, made no impression upon the Government. Seeing, therefore, that

to argue further would be mere waste of time, the Women's Social and

Political Union immediately decided to take action. Hitherto, through

all the hard battles which the Suffragettes had fought outside the

House of Commons, they had never asked the general public to come to

their aid, but, now that the great peoples' demonstration in Hyde Park

had been thus contemptuously ignored, it was decided to call upon both

men and women to attend another monster meeting on June 30th, to be

held this time in Parliament Square, in order that the Government could

not fail to see.

The Commissioner of Police replied by issuing a warning to the public

not to meet in Parliament Square, on the ground that danger would

necessarily arise from the assembling of a large number of persons in

that restricted area, through which the way must be kept for Members of

Parliament.

Meanwhile, the W. S. P. U. again and again urged Mr. Asquith to receive

a deputation, but he still refused, and at last he was informed that

the deputation would start from the Women's Parliament on June 30th,

and would wait upon him at the House of Commons at half past four that

afternoon. Once more he returned a refusal to see the women, but Mrs.

Pankhurst herself replied, as their leader, that the deputation would

arrive at the appointed hour. Next day Mrs. Pankhurst, Mrs. Pethick

Lawrence and eleven other women set out from the Caxton Hall. At the

main entrance of the building Superintendent Wells was waiting with

a body of some twenty constables and, at his orders, as soon as the

thirteen women had emerged, the doors were locked and even the Pressmen

begged in vain to be released. Then the Superintendent constituted

himself the leader and protector of the deputation and led them quickly

through the cheering crowds who pressed forward pushing and struggling

to catch a glimpse of the little band of women. Straight up Victoria

Street he led them and right to the door of the Stranger's Entrance

where they were met by the burly and familiar form of Inspector

Scantlebury surrounded by his minions. He stepped forward and addressed

Mrs. Pankhurst gravely, "Are you Mrs. Pankhurst, and is this your

deputation?" he asked. She answered, "Yes," and he said, "I have orders

to exclude you from the House of Commons." "Has Mr. Asquith received

my letter?" she questioned him in turn, and, replying, "Yes," the

Inspector drew the document from his pocket, adding in response to a

further inquiry, that Mr. Asquith had sent no message of any kind by

way of reply. Then Inspector Scantlebury turned away and walked into

the House, leaving behind him a strong force of police to guard the

door. For an instant or two the women stood there baffled, but they

had to remember the resolve that this effort to interview the Prime

Minister should be entirely peaceful. Moreover, there was the Mass

Meeting of the evening. They therefore merely turned and made their

way back to the Caxton Hall. Meanwhile larger and larger crowds were

flocking towards Parliament from every direction, and long before eight

o'clock, the time at which they had been asked to assemble, it was

estimated by the newspapers that more than 100,000 people had collected

in Parliament Square. The police had made most extensive preparations

to prevent any meeting being held and it was said that more than

5,000 ordinary constables and upwards of fifty mounted men had been

requisitioned for this purpose.

When, at eight o'clock, the women sallied forth in groups from the

Caxton Hall to speak to the great multitude that had assembled in

response to their appeal, the scene was already becoming turbulent.

There were no platforms to speak from, and it would have been useless

to provide them, for the police would instantly have dragged them from

the ground. But it is possible to hold a meeting without official

sanction and to make speeches without platforms and the women bravely

essayed the task. Some of them clung to the railings of Palace Yard

to raise themselves above the crowd, others mounted the steps of

the offices in Broad Sanctuary, others the steps of the Government

buildings at the top of Parliament Street opposite the Abbey, whilst

others again merely spoke from the pavement wherever and whenever the

police would cease for an instant from driving them along. Every woman

who attempted to speak was torn by the harrying constables from the

spot where she had found a foothold and was either hurled aside and

flung into the dense masses that were being kept constantly on the move

or placed under arrest. Meanwhile, the crowd was always surging and

swaying forward shouting out mingled cheers and jeers.

Some groups of the men stood with linked arms around the women who

were striving to make speeches, bodies of others pushed little bands

of Suffragettes forward against the rows of constables with cries of

"Votes of Women," "we'll get you to the House of Commons," and "back up

the women and push them through!" Again and again the police lines were

broken and again and again the mounted men charged and beat the people

back. Mr. Lloyd George, Mr. Winston Churchill, Mr. Herbert Gladstone,

Lord Rosebery and other members of both Houses stood in Palace Yard,

and near the Strangers' entrance watching the scene. As it became

dark the disorder grew, and gangs of roughs who supported neither the

Government nor the women kept making concerted rushes, sweeping the

rest of the people on before them, absolutely heedless of trampling

others under foot. In some cases isolated women were surrounded by them

and with difficulty rescued from their ill treatment by the soberer and

more respectable members of the gathering. But, undaunted either by

violence from the roughs or from the police, the Suffragettes, though

their slight frames were bruised and almost worn out by the constant

battering of those who were so much heavier, stronger and more numerous

than themselves, still continued to address the throng. Every woman who

was arrested was followed to the police station by a stream of cheering

people and was saluted with raised hats and waving handkerchiefs.

As Mr. Asquith passed from the House of Commons to Downing Street in

his motor-car he was hooted by the crowd. He arrived home to find his

windows broken, for Mrs. Leigh and Mrs. New had driven swiftly past the

guardian policemen at the entrance to the street in a taxicab and had

each thrown two small stones through two of the lower windows of Number

10 before an arm of the Law had been stretched out to drag them away to

Canon Row. Meanwhile Miss Mary Phillips had endeavoured to dash into

the House of Commons by way of Palace Yard in the midst of a little

company of Parliamentary waitresses but half way across the Yard had

been seized and dragged back. Miss Lena Lambert had chartered a little

rowing boat and had set off in the darkness to reach the House from the

river side. Crowds of Members were lounging on the lighted terrace that

hot summer's night when she and her little craft appeared out of the

darkness, to urge them to determine that the simple measure of justice,

which was being so hardly fought for, should be carried into law. But

not many words had she spoken, when the police boats swooped down on

her and she was towed away, lest she should irritate and annoy the

people's representatives by telling them of the battle whose dull roar

nothing could shut out.

So the night wore on and that weary fight continued. Not until twelve

o'clock did the police at last succeed in clearing the streets, and it

was then found that twenty-nine women had been arrested.

Next morning twenty-seven of the women were brought up at Westminster

Police Court before the Magistrate, Mr. Francis, and were charged

with obstructing the police in the execution of their duty. With the

usual callous haste their trial was hurried through. The magistrate

had always had all the political rights that he cared to use and would

not trouble to imagine what it is like to be without them. He testily

brushed aside the defence of the women that the Government had driven

them to adopt these methods of obtaining the franchise and that Mr.

Asquith by his ignoring of the Great Hyde Park Demonstration had taught

them once and for all the uselessness of peaceful propaganda. The

sentences ranged from one to three months' imprisonment in the second

division. Mrs. Leigh and Miss New were dealt with separately at Bow

Street but, as this was not generally expected, very few people were

present. In the dimly lighted Court, with the magistrate in his high

backed chair regarding them sternly from deep cavernous eyes, the two

little women in the great dock with its heavy iron railings looked

strangely forlorn. What dreadful sentence, we wondered, was in store

for these, the first of the Suffragettes to deliberately throw stones!

Mr. Muskett in prosecuting them for doing wilful damage to the value

of ten shillings at the Prime Minister's residence, spoke of them with

extreme harshness, urging that they should be sent to prison without

the option of a fine. Though the Magistrate rebuked the women for

the methods they had adopted, we felt that he was impressed by their

demeanour and that he was loth to sentence them. He ordered that they

should go to prison for two months in the third division without the

option of a fine. The sentence was heavy enough, but lighter than we

had feared in view of the fact that many of the other women were to

remain in prison for three months.

[Illustration: Christabel Pankhurst inviting the public to "rush" the

House of Commons at a meeting in Trafalgar Square, Sunday, October

11th, 1908]

When the House of Commons met on the same afternoon, several members of

every party in the House asked, as they had done on previous occasions,

that the women should be treated as political offenders. As before,

however, Mr. Gladstone sheltered himself behind the statement, which

nobody believed, that the Magistrate was alone responsible for placing

the women in the second and third divisions and that he himself had no

power to interfere.

On the morning after the "raid" the newspapers had mostly contented

themselves with rebuking the women for what they had done, but in a few

days there came a reaction of feeling which was accelerated both by the

harshness of the sentences imposed and by Mr. Gladstone's refusal to

mitigate the rigours of the prison treatment.

The country was now overwhelmed by one of those terribly oppressive

heat waves which come upon us suddenly from time to time and are borne

with such difficulty in our usually temperate climate, and there

gradually leaked out from Holloway accounts of the Suffragist women

fainting in the exercise yards[28] and being seized with illness in

their cells. There happened to be some cases of measles in the prison

hospital, and Miss Elsie Howey, having contracted the disease there,

was exceedingly ill for many weeks.

All these things combined to focus public attention upon the harsh

treatment of the Suffragette prisoners. On July 10th the _Manchester

Guardian_ in a leading Article said:

It demands considerable obtuseness to believe, as some persons

apparently do, that close confinement in the heat of Summer or the

cold of Winter within a solitary and unwholesome cell, deprival of

exercise for twenty-three hours out of the twenty-four, subjection

to menial authority, ignorance of the welfare of one's friends, the

performing of dull and alien tasks, deprivation of writing materials,

partial suffocation and the wearing of ugly, ill-fitting clothing

that has already been worn by the vilest criminals, are for delicate

and sensitive women the elements of a comedy. They compose a great

and terrible torture.... Because they are suffering for an idea

their stringent imprisonment is indefensible. It violates the public

conscience and the law and the courts cannot wage war on the public

conscience without forfeiting respect and authority.

[Illustration: Mrs. Pankhurst and Christabel hiding from the police in

the roof garden at Clement's Inn, October 12th, 1908]

FOOTNOTES:

[27] Other suffrage societies soon afterwards also adopted colours. The

Women's Freedom League chose yellow, white and green, and the National

Union of Women's Suffrage Societies red, white and green.

[28] The efforts of Dr. Mary Gordon (the first lady Inspector of

Prisons, who had been appointed during the previous April, admittedly

owing to the publicity given to the condition of women in prison by the

Suffragettes) now secured that when exercising in the future the women

should be provided with cotton sun-bonnets. By her advice the prisoners

were also supplied with notebooks and pencils, but the latter privilege

was afterwards withdrawn. Eventually she succeeded in abolishing the

unsanitary wooden spoon--at any rate, for Suffragette use.

The Suffragette: The History of the Women's Militant Suffrage Movement, 1905-1910 · 第 13 / 22 章