ships of 80,875 tons, and 15,240 horse-power, afloat or in course of
construction, evidently more than they could profitably employ: they,
therefore, applied for and obtained from their Government, in 1861, a
contract for the conveyance of the French mails to India and China,
requiring for this purpose only an additional steamer. But the increase
of trade to the East, brought about in no small degree by the increased
facilities and by an anxious desire on the part of the company to
meet the wants of the travellers of all nations, very soon enabled
the directors to double the services of their steamers to the East.
In 1871 their fleet measuring 137,334 tons, of 20,885 horse-power,
performed services on the India and China routes of 230,135 French
leagues; on the Mediterranean and Black Sea, 153,478; and, on the
Brazilian, 50,004: in all, 423,607 leagues annually, independently of
various extra services. Since then their Brazilian and La Plata lines
have been doubled, and now (1875) the company employs 175,000 tons of
steam-ships, besides chartering numerous sailing-vessels.[363]
When first the Messageries Company became carriers by sea, they had
nearly all their vessels built in England, but they now possess large
establishments of their own, where they construct screw-steamers of
iron, rivalling in most respects, and very much resembling those of,
the Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company, of which I have
furnished an illustration.
[Sidenote: Largest vessels.]
Their two largest ships employed in the trade with India and China are
the _Anadyr_ and the _Irawaddy_, of 3671 and 3471 tons gross register
respectively, and each of 600 nominal horse-power. The other sixteen
vessels in that service range from 3017 tons and 500 horse-power, down
to 1035 tons and 280 horse-power. Their six steamers employed on the
Brazilian and River Plate line are from 3417 tons and 600 horse-power,
to 2115 tons and 400 horse-power, while the thirty-five engaged in
the Mediterranean and Black Sea services range from 2524 tons and 500
horse-power to 430 tons and 160 horse-power. They have also three
steamers of 1500 tons and 250 horse-power engines on the compound
principle trading between London and Marseilles, and four magnificent
screw-steamers in course of construction, each of 4000 tons and 600
horse-power.
The trade of this large Company now embraces all the chief ports of
the Mediterranean and Black Sea, and those of India, China, Java, and
Japan, as well as of Algeria and the Brazils; and the excellent manner
in which the different lines are conducted and navigated by Frenchmen
is the best answer that can be given to the old saying that the French
never were and never will be a maritime people. That they do not equal
the English on the ocean is likely enough, nevertheless that they
would become much greater as shipowners than they now are there can
be little doubt, were they governed by wise laws and left to depend
upon their own energy and resources rather than on government grants.
Throughout all time “protective” laws seem to have retarded the natural
development of commerce, as they have been too frequently the ruin of
nations as well as of individuals.
[Sidenote: Trade viâ the Suez Canal.]
The ships of the Messageries Maritimes Company, like those of their
great competitors for the trade of the East, the Peninsular and
Oriental Company, now pass through the Suez Canal. But, besides these
two companies, the former of which receives nearly double the amount
of subsidy of the other,[364] there are now numerous other steam lines
following the same route, all bidding for the ever envied trade of the
once mysterious Cathay; and these have increased enormously since the
waters of the Red Sea, passing through the desert, mingled with those
of the Mediterranean.
Hitherto steam to India by the way of the Cape of Good Hope has proved
an unprofitable undertaking: nor, with all the improvements tending
towards increased economy on the one hand, and greater capacity for
cargo on the other, does it offer many more inducements now, than it
did when the _Enterprize_ first found her way to Calcutta.
Nor, indeed, has any better success attended steam navigation
undertakings to the distant colonies of Australia. From the time that
the trade with India was thrown open, sailing-ships thither, as well
as to Australia, have been the chief means of transport, and these
still carry by far the largest proportion of the goods traffic, though
first-class passengers prefer the more expeditious overland routes: but
steam-boats, even though largely subsidized, especially to India by
the way of the Cape, have found it impossible to compete successfully
with the sailing-ships of Messrs. Green of Blackwall, Messrs. T. and W.
Smith, and other private shipowners long engaged in the trade.
The two steam companies, formed nearly simultaneously about the year
1852 to run viâ the Cape of Good Hope: one, the General Screw Steam
Company to Calcutta and intermediate Indian ports; and the other, the
Australian Royal Mail Steam Company, though each received large grants
of public money, alike proved signal failures. Nor can the failure of
these undertakings be altogether attributed to mismanagement. A good
deal of it was, doubtless, due to the description of vessels employed,
and to their unsuitability for the services undertaken, but still
more to the fact that neither auxiliary steam-ships, nor full-powered
steamers, have hitherto been profitable on distant voyages.
[Sidenote: Presumed advantage of auxiliary engines.]
About that period many shipowners were under the impression that
full-rigged ships, such as the _Massachusetts_, with an auxiliary
steam-engine, to be used only in calms and light winds, would in
themselves combine all the best qualities of a sailing-ship and
steamer: nor was this surprising. On the voyage, for instance, from
England to India a sailing-vessel during the favourable trade winds and
monsoons, which can always be depended upon for a considerable part
of the voyage, would, under sail alone, make almost as much progress
as a steamer; while, in the calms, which are invariably met with for
from five to ten degrees on each side of the Equator, and, where
sailing-vessels frequently are long detained, the small steam-engine
could be applied to great advantage; as also on entering as well as
on leaving harbours. Indeed, so strongly impressed was I with the
value of auxiliary steam-vessels for distant voyages, that, in 1856, I
undertook, even after these failures, to convey in seven such steamers,
three-fourths of which belonged to myself, the monthly mails, within a
given time, between London, the Cape of Good Hope, Mauritius, Ceylon,
Madras, and Calcutta.
The vessels thus employed were built entirely of iron, and ship-rigged,
as may be seen by the following illustration of one of them; more
fully so, in proportion to their size, than those of the General Screw
Company, and, as their engines were only from 80 to 120 horse-power
nominal, on a tonnage of from 800 to 1500 tons gross, they were purely
auxiliary vessels. Under sail their speed was from 10 to 11 knots, with
a favourable wind, and, under steam alone, from 6 to 7 knots an hour in
light breezes or calms, but, in adverse winds, they made little or no
progress, a fact arising in great measure from their small steam-power
and from the resistance their heavy spars presented to the winds:
consequently, though they met with no accidents, and were more to be
depended upon, as to time, than ordinary sailing-vessels, they could
not maintain the regularity essential for the mail service; so, after
twelve months’ experience, I relinquished the undertaking.
[Illustration: AUXILIARY STEAMER TO CAPE AND INDIA.]
Since that time no mails have been carried in any description of
steam-vessels from England to ports eastward of the Cape of Good Hope
by the Atlantic sea route, except it may be to Natal, and occasionally
to the Mauritius, or to Zanzibar on the east coast of Africa.
[Sidenote: Not borne out by the results.]
In full powered steamers the space required for coals and machinery
on these distant oversea voyages, over and above their first cost and
current expenses, prevent them carrying cargo sufficient to afford
remunerative returns, and their owners are not recouped by the extra
rates of freight obtainable for the time saved on the voyages. In the
case of the auxiliary steamers the results are the same, arising in a
great measure from similar causes, for, though such vessels had greater
space for cargo, yet the advantage thus gained is counterbalanced by
the maintenance of a staff of engineers and firemen who, during the
greater portion of the voyage are unemployed, and by the fact already
stated that, though the auxiliary engine is valuable in calms, it has
not power enough to be of service against strong and adverse winds.
As a rule, therefore, it is in most cases more profitable to employ
either a steamer with only light spars and a few fore and aft sails, or
a full-rigged vessel which depends entirely upon her sails. Anything
between the two has not hitherto been found to answer so well, though
there may be exceptions depending on the trade in which such vessels
are employed.
[Sidenote: Conveyance of the Australian mails.]
From the time of the opening of the overland route, all the mails to
the East Indies have passed through Egypt, except those despatched by
the two lines of auxiliary steamers round the Cape of Good Hope, to
which I have just referred; and even by these vessels few or no letters
were sent except to the intermediate ports; but, for many years after
the overland route had been opened, the British mails to Australia and
New Zealand were conveyed almost entirely by sailing-vessels, except
during the two or three years the Australian Royal Mail Steam Packet
Company carried on its operations. When the steamers of that company
were unable any longer to continue the service, the Peninsular and
Oriental Company undertook, as we have seen, the conveyance of these,
the more important mails by way of Ceylon; but, when the service was
relinquished for a time, as some of their steamers were required as
transports for the Crimean War, the conveyance of the whole of the
Australian mails, greatly to the annoyance and discomfort of the
colonists, reverted again to sailing-vessels.
To obviate as far as practicable the delay and uncertainty in the time
of the delivery of the letters, Government, instead of contracting
for their conveyance by any one line of sailing-vessels, considered
it expedient to throw the contracts open to the competition of all
suitable vessels engaged in the trade with Australia. But this, too,
was merely an experiment, and one which proved alike unsatisfactory to
the public and Government. It was tried, however, for a year or more
and, as it so happened, the trial was made just between the time when
the steamers of the General Screw Company and those of the Australian
Royal Mail Company had ceased to run, and of my own experiment with the
Cape and Indian mail services.
[Sidenote: Peculiar conditions of contracts.]
To insure speed and, if possible, regularity, the Post Office
authorities stipulated that from the amount to be paid to each ship
thus employed, there should be deducted a penalty of 20_l._ for every
day’s delay in the delivery of the letters beyond the time specified in
the tender. Instead of leaving the sum, as had hitherto been and now
is the invariable practice, to be named by the person who tendered,
Government fixed it at 1000_l._ for the passage, accepting the offer
which contained the fewest number of days for the performance of the
service. Thus, a shipowner who could reckon with tolerable certainty,
that his vessel would make the voyage to Australia in 100 days, which
most first-class ships could do, might safely tender to do it in, say,
seventy-seven days, because after the deduction of the 20_l._ per day
for the twenty-three days in excess, he would have a balance of 540_l._
to receive (besides other advantages which “mail-packets” derived), and
as that sum would further cover an additional excess of twenty-seven
days, or say altogether fifty days beyond the time contracted for, the
speculation was an exceedingly safe one to a sailing-ship, even if the
tender were made for the shortest time in which the fastest steamer had
been known to accomplish the voyage. Hence this system of tender proved
altogether illusory as regarded the securing a rapid communication. The
very first ship, the _Stratford_, despatched under the new arrangement,
occupied on her outward passage a period of thirty-seven days in excess
of the time stipulated!
[Sidenote: Failure of the service.]
[Sidenote: Stringent penalties.]
If the colonists had been loud in their previous complaints they were
still more so now; but the Treasury and Post Office authorities,
considering that they had done their best to secure speed, were, for
a time, immovable and indisposed to make any further experiments.
Steamers and sailing-vessels on so distant a voyage having alike
failed, Government thought there was now a good answer to all
complaints, and, consequently, treated them with indifference. They
argued, referring to the then recent failure of the Australian Royal
Mail Packet Company, that, as the steam-vessels between England and
Sydney had varied from seventy-six to 120 days, while the length of
passage by fast sailing-ships between England and Port Phillip was
from eighty-two to 110 days, the difference was not really of any
serious disadvantage. Nevertheless, while Government refused increased
grants for the conveyance of the mails, it adopted and enforced much
more rigorous penalties[365] against owners of sailing-ships to ensure
a more speedy performance of the mail services. This fresh experiment,
however, from its extreme rigour also failed, and some time elapsed
before the colonists obtained what they had long demanded, a direct
and _independent_ line of steam-vessels by way of Suez and Ceylon;
and that, as we have seen, proved in the hands of the European and
Australian Steam Navigation Company the most signal failure of all the
experiments which had been made.
[Sidenote: Australian steam services. ]
Among the instances where anything like success has attended steam
voyages direct to Australia, may be mentioned the services performed by
Messrs. Gibbs, Bright, and Company, in their steamship _Great Britain_
from Liverpool, and in the steamers belonging to Messrs. Money Wigram
and Sons, of London, which now trade to these colonies. Occasionally
other steamers are despatched to Australia and also to New Zealand, and
recently a company was formed—the Australian Direct Steam Navigation
Company—with the intention of maintaining a regular monthly line from
London to Melbourne, calling at Falmouth, the projectors anticipating
the performances of the passage in “under forty-five days.” But though
this undertaking failed at the outset, and experience can alone test
the realization of the sanguine expectations of its promoters, it
may be said in favour of their views, that the difficulties previous
pioneers of steam-vessels on long oversea voyages have had to encounter
are being rapidly surmounted by the new compound engines, where the
consumption of coals required to attain a given speed is not one-half
of what it was twenty years ago.
[Sidenote: Mr. Alfred Holt’s line of steamers to China.]
So far as regards the trade with India and China by way of the Cape of
Good Hope, the steam-line started by Mr. Alfred Holt of Liverpool in
1865 is the only one within my recollection, which has hitherto proved
successful. Though the steamers of this line now proceed to China by
the Suez Canal, their performances were remarkable when engaged in
the former route. Starting from Liverpool they _never stopped till
they reached Mauritius, a distance of 8500 miles_, being under steam
the whole way, a feat hitherto considered impossible; thence they
proceeded to Penang, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Shanghai, and, though
unaided by any government grants, performed these distant voyages with
extraordinary regularity.
In forwarding the particulars of his first three vessels, Mr. Holt[366]
remarks: “Since the Suez Canal was opened I have found that the square
sails of the _Agamemnon_, _Ajax_, and _Achilles_[367] were of little
use, and, therefore, I have converted these three ships into what the
Americans call ‘barquentine rig’ (i.e. no square yards on mainmast),
and have constructed all my new ships with pole-masts only.”
[Sidenote: Its success.]
These three vessels are each 2270 tons gross or 1550 net register, with
engines of 300 nominal horse-power.[368] Messrs. Holt have also eleven
other steamers, similar in size and power, at present engaged in trade
with the East, and three more in course of construction, besides a
tug-steamer of 350 tons to attend on them in their passage through the
Suez Canal. They carry goods right through to Penang, Singapore, Hong
Kong, and Shanghai, calling at Galle and Amoy, or other ports in the
Eastern seas when required; and one is struck with the low rates at
which goods are now conveyed[369] to India and China compared with the
freights charged by the sailing-vessels of the old East India Company,
together with the wonderful regularity and expedition[370] with which
they are delivered.
Although the fleet of this spirited undertaking is known as the Ocean
Steam-ship Company, it is neither a public nor a limited company, the
vessels being owned in shares under the old law by a few individuals
(like many others of a similar description in this country), but
chiefly by the managing owners, Mr. Alfred and his brother Mr. Philip
H. Holt, whose thorough business habits have materially promoted the
success of the company.
[Sidenote: Messrs. Gellatly, Hankey, and Company.]
It would be impossible to notice within the limits of this work the
different lines of steam-ships now trading to the East by way of the
Suez Canal. Among the most conspicuous, however, may be mentioned
those of Messrs. Gellatly, Hankey, Sewell, and Company, London, which,
from the order and regularity of their despatch, bid fair to rival the
subsidized companies. Many of the vessels under their agency belong
to Messrs. Thomas Wilson, Sons, and Company, of Hull, long known as
large owners of vessels trading from that place to various ports in the
Baltic, but who, since the opening of the Suez Canal, have established
a line of very fine steam-ships from London to India.
Their _Hindoo_ for instance, of 3257 tons gross register, has capacity
for about 3500 tons weight, “including coals in bunkers, and from 80
to 120 passengers,” for whom accommodation is provided “amidships, a
method which has apparently given great satisfaction to those who have
been travellers by them.”
Another line of steamers under the management of the same firm run in
connection with the British India Steam Navigation Company, taking
passengers and mails to Columbia, Madras, and Calcutta, with branch
steamers from Aden to Zanzibar on the one hand, and to Karáchí and the
Persian Gulf on the other.
Foreign nations have likewise taken advantage of the opening of the
Suez Canal to run lines of steam-ships to the East; and, besides the
French Messageries Maritimes, there are the Austrian Lloyd’s Company of
Trieste, and the Rubbotino Company of Genoa, respectively supported by
the Austrian and Italian Governments, each running a fortnightly line
to Bombay during the four best passenger months of the year, namely,
from January to April, and despatching their ships every month during
the remaining portion of the year.
[Sidenote: Messrs. Green and Company.]
There is also the “Ducal” line from London, running in connection with
the old and celebrated sailing-vessels belonging to Messrs. Green,
of Blackwall, which is still maintained; and the “Queen” and “City”
lines of steamers direct to Calcutta,[371] as well as various other
similar private undertakings. Nor is Liverpool behind the capital in
its race by way of the Suez Canal, for that far-famed trade which the
Phœnicians, Romans, Venetians, Portuguese, Dutch, and English alike, in
turn, have envied and expended untold millions to maintain.
[Sidenote: Messrs. Rathbone Brothers.]
As a specimen of the ordinary first-class merchant steamers now trading
between Liverpool and Calcutta, I may instance one of the vessels
belonging to Messrs. Rathbone Brothers, of that place. She is of 2610
tons gross and 1682 tons net register, and has capacity for 2200 tons
of cargo, besides 450 tons of coal.[372] She is rigged merely with
poles (a mode of rig now becoming very general in all steam-vessels),
on which, with the exception of one fore-square sail, a few fore and
aft sails alone can be set. The owners remark the “best passages of our
ships as yet are as follows:—Liverpool to Calcutta (viâ Gibraltar)
to Saugar (near Calcutta), thirty-one days, including all stoppages;
Calcutta to London (viâ Galle and of course Suez Canal) to _Nore_
light-ship, thirty-four days thirteen hours, steaming time on the whole
voyage (exclusive of Suez Canal and stoppages) sixty-one days twelve
hours. The best homeward passage hitherto made by any of our ships,
landing cargo at Colombo and Port Said, occupied thirty-three days
seventeen hours, inclusive of all stoppages.”
From these and previous figures, my readers will more fully understand
the progress that has been made in our ordinary trading communications
with India and China, since the days of the East India Company, and
ascertain what has been gained, since then in the speed, capacity, and
current expenses of our merchant-ships.
[Sidenote: Messrs. George Smith and Sons.]
In further illustration of the progress made in our own time I cannot
do better than furnish my readers with a letter I received (January
1875) from Mr. George Smith, of Glasgow.
Indeed, this letter contains in itself a history of the rise of the
merchant-vessels of Great Britain during the period to which Mr. Smith
refers, and marks the different stages of progress and the means
whereby we have been enabled not merely to maintain, but to surpass,
in maritime supremacy, all nations. It, likewise, illustrates how
individuals (for the case of Messrs. George Smith and Sons is no
exception to the general rule, though their operations may be on a
more extensive scale than those of most other shipowners) have, since
they have been relieved from the trammels of protection and been left
to exercise as they deem best their own genius and industry, more
than kept pace with other branches of commerce by the improvement and
increase of their ships.
“Our first purchase,” Mr. Smith states in his letter, “was a small
colonial barque in 1840, which was followed shortly thereafter by the
purchase of a barque of 346 tons, in course of construction, and a ship
of 500 tons then nearly in frame, both being of the ten years class.
“The first ship which we contracted for and had built to our own
specification was the _Majestic_, launched in 1846. Our second, the
_City of Glasgow_, was built at Kelvinhaugh, and launched in 1848.
While she was on the stocks, the bounds of the municipality of Glasgow
as a city had been extended to the junction of the Kelvin and Clyde
westwards, and thus embraced the shipyard in which she was built. Our
late Mr. R. Smith was then a magistrate of the city of Glasgow, and
this being the first ship built in the extended royalty, we reckoned
no name could be more appropriate, and, as other ships came into
existence, we still kept the _City_,[373] and merely added a name in
future designations.
“When we commenced the trade, we employed the regular brokers for
loading outwards, and had every reason to be satisfied with the
attention paid to our interests by the gentleman who did our business,
but the practice, which then obtained here, of laying a ship on the
berth and allowing her to lie till nearly loaded before naming the
sailing date, and that date, when named, frequently not adhered to, we
felt very annoying, not only as keeping back shipments but as sending
goods to Liverpool which should have gone from this direct. Our rule
was to have our dates of sailing definitely fixed. Only one firm,
however, in the trade held the same view with ourselves, and feeling
the annoyance, they and we resolved on starting a monthly line to
Calcutta. Together we had not so many vessels as were required to keep
up the monthly conveyance, but we resolved to add to our tonnage and
make up for the then deficiency by chartering so far as necessary.
We had made a special stipulation that _our_ broker should still act
for _our_ ships, and also for those that it might fall to our lot to
charter. When this proposal was submitted to him we were surprised to
find that he declined very decidedly to have anything to do with the
arrangement—that his lengthened experience in the trade satisfied him
that it would prove a failure—and he was therefore not prepared to
allow his name to be associated with it; but he lived long enough to
find he had been mistaken.
[Sidenote: Messrs. Smiths’ ships, and their voyages to and from India.]
“Having experienced the difficulty arising from brokers acting to-day
for a party who adhered to their date, and to-morrow for another who
would not let their vessels go until filled, we at once decided on
taking charge of the loading ourselves, which we still continue.
After this we went on steadily increasing our fleet of sailing-ships
until those afloat numbered thirty-five. Our last contract for a
sailing-vessel was in September 1868.
“For several years, our operations were confined to Calcutta, but, in
1863, at the solicitation of several friends, we started a monthly
line to Bombay, having in the meantime increased our sailings very
materially to Calcutta as well. The following statement shows the
number of voyages completed to each port in 1871, and is a fair
estimate of the work of the previous eight years. We had, in fact, a
virtual monopoly of the trade, gained by strict punctuality—a high
class of ships and moderate charges, ever studying to arrange rates
that our friends could not go past us to do better.[374]
“Our first _iron_ ship was launched in 1856; our wooden ones were
disposed of as opportunity offered, and, in 1868, only one of these
remained, which we have since sold.
“We commenced steam in 1871, by contracting for four boats of 2250 tons
gross, and about 1700 tons register, having compound engines of 200
horse-power, working up to 1000. The boilers have been a serious source
of annoyance to us from the first. When all goes right, we get 9 to 9½
knots out of them, and make the passage (viâ Suez Canal) in thirty-nine
days including stoppages; but the irregularity attending their working
prevents us from giving you a list of their passages as desired;
latterly, we have added two of a larger class and more power. These
have been making the passages regularly in thirty-one to thirty-three
days, and we anticipate equal results from other four now in course of
construction.”
[Sidenote: Changes in the mode of conducting commerce with India and
China.]
In the brief account thus given we have a condensed history of the
changes and progress of the merchant ships of Great Britain during the
last thirty-five years, so far as regards our trade with India. Step by
step, they rise from wood to iron and increase in size from 350 to 1500
tons as sailing-ships, while these in turn are now being to a large
extent supplanted by iron screw-steamers of from 2000 to 3000 tons
and upwards. In most respects, the sailing-ships of Messrs. Smith and
Son very much resemble the finest of the modern free-trade Indiamen,
whereof a drawing has been furnished;[375] and their steam-ships are
not unlike the more recent vessels of which various illustrations
are given in these pages; their _City of Oxford_, for instance, of
2220 tons gross, carries 2500 tons of Calcutta cargo, besides 750
tons of coals in her bunkers; and she is navigated by forty-nine
persons, comprising commander, surgeon, two officers, twenty seamen,
seventeen men in the engineer’s department, and eight persons otherwise
employed.[376]
Such are the vessels now carrying on the more valuable portion of our
trade with India, through that great maritime highway, which the genius
and industry of De Lesseps has so recently opened to our vast commerce
with the far East, three-fourths of which, however, is still conducted
by the way of the Cape of Good Hope.[377]
[Sidenote: Number of vessels through Suez Canal since its opening, and
their nationality.]
In the Appendix to this volume[378] will be found an account of the
vessels which have annually passed through the Suez Canal since that
great undertaking was opened, specifying the different nations to which
they belong. Some interesting and instructive facts may be gathered
from these returns, especially with regard to the remarkably rapid
growth of the traffic, increasing as this has done from 486 ships of
435,908 tons in 1870, to 1264 ships of 2,423,672 tons in 1874. Nor is
it less worthy of notice that more than three-fourths of the whole of
this tonnage belongs to Great Britain.[379]
Figures such as these may in some measure set at rest the fear long
entertained that the opening of this canal would be prejudicial, in
any material extent, to the interests of England, by diverting the
course of commerce with India to its former European centres, and
restoring the commercial greatness of Constantinople, Venice, Leghorn,
Marseilles, Cadiz, and Lisbon. For, though these places cannot fail to
be benefited to a greater or less extent, and they have already been
so, by the re-opening of the ancient route, their superior position to
that of the ports of Great Britain will be of little avail, till they
adopt the policy pursued with so much success by this country. If they
desire to secure that share of the commerce of India, to which from
their natural position they may fairly consider themselves entitled,
they must open their ports to the ships of all nations, sweep away
their differential and protective duties, establish docks and bonding
warehouses, and offer to the traders of the world equal facilities for
obtaining whatever description of its assorted produce they may require
for their varied wants. The mere fact of being a few days nearer
Calcutta or Bombay will otherwise avail them little, distance in itself
being now of comparatively small importance to what it was before
steam-ships traversed the ocean.
FOOTNOTES:
[360] Besides the _Bavarian_, Messrs. Leyland employ in this trade the
_Bohemian_ and _Bulgarian_, similar in all respects, each of which is
400 feet in length, 37 feet wide, and 28 feet in depth, with engines of
350 nominal horse-power. They have also in the same trade other three
sister ships, the _Iberian_, _Illyrian_, and _Istrian_, each 2890 tons
gross register and carrying 4400 tons of cargo, dimensions 390 ⨉ 37 ⨉
29.
[361] The whole steam tonnage of France amounted in 1873 to 185,165
tons net register.
[362] The Greeks, strange to say, considering their shrewdness and keen
business habits, stopped the coasting trade of foreigners, thereby
doing incalculable injury to their own commerce, not having capital
themselves to supply the deficiency or perform adequately the service.
[363] My readers will perceive that this company apparently owns
within 10,000 tons of the whole of the steam-shipping of France, but
this arises from the gross tonnage being given in the former returns,
and only the net registered tons in the latter. Nevertheless, the
Messageries Maritimes is now the largest steam-ship company in the
world. A list of the steamers of this company, and how employed, will
be found in the Appendix No. 24, p. 641.
[364] The Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company for a
service of 1,171,092 miles, receives 430,000_l._, while the Messageries
Maritimes is paid at present (June 1875) 399,838_l._ for a service of
631,514 miles.
[365] An amusing incident occurred at this time to myself not
altogether unworthy of notice. When the discussions were going on
about the irregularity of the sailing-ship mails, the late Mr. James
Wilson, then Secretary to the Treasury, one day asked me how these
irregularities could best be remedied. “Oh,” I said, half in joke
and half in earnest, “adopt the horse-shoe nail mode of levying your
penalties: inflict, as you do now, 20_l._ for the first day’s delay,
but increase it to 40_l._ for the second, 80_l._ for the third, 160_l._
for the fourth, 320_l._ for the fifth, 640_l._ for the sixth, and no
pay at all for the conveyance of the mails if the ships are seven days
beyond the time stipulated in their contract, and you will be no longer
troubled with tenders professing to deliver your letters in less time
than the passage, under ordinary circumstances, can be accomplished.”
A scheme of penalties, somewhat after this fashion, was immediately
afterwards adopted; but I had unwittingly prepared a stick to break my
own back. The second contract for the Cape and India mails, to which
I have referred in the text, was one of the earliest to which this
new principle was applied, and I could not of course object to the
stringency of this new fashioned penalty clause, as it was of my own
creation. Nor did the Government hesitate to put it in force when my
ships were behind time, as also in the case of the unfortunate European
and Australian Steam Navigation Company. But though the new principle
promptly and effectually put a stop to all tenders of the class of
which Mr. Wilson complained, it was much too rigorous to be continued
and was abolished.
[366] Mr. Alfred Holt is the third son of my old friend, the late Mr.
George Holt of Liverpool. He is an engineer by profession, having
served his apprenticeship to Mr. Edward Woods, the engineer of the
Liverpool and Manchester Railway. Afterwards, he became the inspecting
engineer of my steamers and of those of others; and when he himself, in
time, became the owner of steam-ships, in partnership with his brother,
Mr. Philip H. Holt, he showed what knowledge, practically gained, could
achieve, and, thoroughly beating his old employers by the production
of the vessels to which I refer, he now ranks high, and deservedly
high, among the great shipowners of his native town. Though he has no
claim to be considered the inventor of the compound engine, for that is
almost as old, in one form or another, as the present century; he was
the first to apply the principle on _long oversea voyages_. The ships
of the Pacific Company had, it is true, that description of engine
in use before him, but only in those of their ships engaged in the
coasting trade of the Pacific. Mr. Holt’s steamers were consequently
the first to show the advantages to be derived from the compound
principle on such voyages as those from England to Mauritius, a
distance of 8500 miles without stopping, then a marvellous performance;
and it was, only, from the time he thus _practically_ demonstrated the
great value of such engines, that they have been generally adopted.
[367] The _Achilles_ left Foochow, July 16th, 1869, and arrived at
London round the Cape of Good Hope, September 16th, having been
fifty-eight days nine hours under steam—13,552 miles.
[368] Their dimensions are as follows: 309 feet in length, 38½ feet
beam, and 28½ depth of hold to upper or spar deck.
[369] Freight for ordinary packages of measurement goods:
To Suez, Penang, and Singapore, 50_s._ per ton, with 5 per cent.
primage.
To Hong Kong and Shanghai, 50_s._ per ton, with 5 per cent. primage.
Through bills of lading are signed for—
Yokohama, Foo-choo-Foo, and Amoy, @ 90_s._
Manilla, 90_s._, Batavia, 80_s._, Samarang, 84_s._, Sourabaya, 85_s._,
Padang and Macassar, 92_s._, Chinkiang, 77_s._ 6_d._, Kiukiang, 80_s._,
Hankow, 85_s._, Nagasaki, 75_s._, and Hiogo, 80_s._ per ton.
All without primage. No bill of lading signed for less than 2_l._ 2_s._
Freight payable on delivery of bills of lading.
[370] The _Agamemnon_ left Hankow, 604 miles above Shanghai, on May
25th, 1873, and arrived (by way of the Suez Canal and Gibraltar) at
London, July 12th. The mails, which left Shanghai June 1st, arrived in
London _viâ_ Brindisi, July 21st, and the passage of the _Agamemnon_ is
not an exceptional one.
[371] The _Queen Margaret_, 3138 tons register, belonging to the Queen
Steam Shipping Company (Limited), has just (Sept. 1875) made the
passage from London to Calcutta under 30 days, including 40 hours’
detention in the Suez Canal (or, 28 days and 8 hours), which, as yet,
is, I believe, the fastest passage on record.
[372] The dimensions of this vessel are 350 feet in length, 37 feet
in breadth, and 27 feet 5 inches extreme depth of hold. She has three
decks, her engines are 300 nominal horse-power, and her crew consists
of fifty persons all told.
[373] All the ships of Messrs. George Smith and Sons are named after
different cities.
[374]
CALCUTTA.
We despatched to Calcutta viâ the Cape of Good Hope, in 1871,
twenty-four sailing ships:
Shortest passage out 79 days.
Shortest passage home 93 days.
Shortest round voyage, Pilot to Pilot 6 months and 9 days.
Average passage out 95 days.
Average passage home 108 days.
Five of the voyages were completed under seven months. A few of these
vessels loaded out from London. The others were all from the Clyde.
BOMBAY.
We despatched to Bombay, in 1871, sixteen sailing-ships completing the
same number of voyages:
Shortest passage out 83 days.
Shortest passage home 95 days.
Average passage out 106 days.
Average passage home 117 days.
Shortest voyage 7 months and 18 days.
[375] See vol. ii. p. 493.
[376] The dimensions of this ship are 325 feet in length, 37 feet beam,
and 27½ feet extreme depth. The cylinders of her engines (compound) are
39 and 68 inches respectively in diameter and the length of stroke 42
inches.
[377] I may here state that the bulkiest articles of Indian produce,
consisting as they do of cotton, jute, rice, sugar, saltpetre, cutch,
and such like, as also woods of various kinds, cannot, as a rule,
afford to pay the rates necessary to remunerate a steam-ship for their
conveyance; hence, such articles will most likely continue to be sent
to Europe by the Cape route, except when in special demand. That such
will most probably continue to be the case is apparent from the fact
that, though, during the last two years, the competition between
the steamers passing through the Suez Canal has been so great as to
reduce their rates of freight almost to a level with those paid to
sailing-vessels, the latter still continue to secure full cargoes.
This may, in some measure, be accounted for by many, indeed, the bulk
of those cargoes being sold “to arrive:” hence, merchants frequently
prefer sailing-vessels, especially for the shipment of jute, rice,
and other articles of comparatively low value, as thus they have a
longer time at their disposal, and thus frequently avoid the expense of
warehousing, to which, in the case of goods by steamers, they are often
obliged to resort, from the short time allowed in all contracts, for
the discharge of such vessels.
[378] Appendix No. 25, p. 643.
[379] In calling attention to the results of the construction of the
Suez Canal, the _Friend of India_ says:—“No more striking illustration
could be adduced of the revolution effected by the Suez Canal than that
suggested by a comparison of the shipping advertisements of to-day with
those of twenty years ago. Then we hardly ever heard of steamers in
these regions, except in connection with the stately proceedings and
crushing fares of the Peninsular and Oriental Company. Then, it was a
splendid run to get home in one of Green or Smith’s clippers in ninety
days. Now, an ordinary cargo steamer, carrying a few passengers, lands
us comfortably at Liverpool on the thirtieth day. First we have the
time-honoured Peninsular and Oriental Company, next the Messageries
Maritimes de France, then the Italian Steam Navigation Company. Not
inferior to the last-mentioned is the Austro-Hungarian Lloyd’s Steam
Navigation Company, then comes the Anchor line, followed by the
Wilson line, the Star line, &c. Besides the regular steamers of these
and similar ‘lines,’ we have our choice of a large and constantly
increasing number of private vessels—less regular, perhaps, in their
departures and arrivals, but many of them not a whit inferior in size,
accommodation, speed, and careful management. Another note-worthy
feature in these noble steam fleets is the nature of the vessels
generally composing them. It will be found that nearly the whole of
the steamers are new, many of them having been built expressly for the
Indian passenger trade; and all are superbly fitted out with every
convenience and luxury. Twenty years ago, a vessel of 1500 tons ranked
as the largest of our Indian sailing-vessels. Now, 3000 tons is a very
common figure to see appended to the name of a passenger steamer, and
4000 tons not uncommon, while some are considerably above that tonnage.
In point of speed, several steam vessels owned by new companies are
equal, if not superior, to the Peninsular and Oriental. Recently we
read of a steamer leaving Suez two days after the Peninsular and
Oriental, and arriving at Bombay one day earlier. The lowering of fares
is another item worthy of consideration. A first-class passage can now
be obtained, exclusive of beer and wine, for 450 rupees. The result
of all this is a greatly increased and rapidly increasing flight to
England from India; and an annual accession of visitors and tourists
from England, the Continent, and America, to India. Even our hill
stations are losing their summer visitors—drained off by the absorbing
Suez Canal. And many parents, who formerly sent their children to
hill schools, are now taking advantage of cheap passages to give them
the benefit of home education. As fares are reduced still more this
homeward tendency will further increase. Why should not 30_l._ pay as
well for thirty days without beer and wines as 60_l._ used to pay for
ninety days with beer and wines? We believe that first-class passages
will eventually be procurable for 30_l._, and that now is the time for
shipping companies to look the future in the face.”
CHAPTER XII.
First application of steam-vessels on the rivers and coasts
of India, 1825—S.S. _Diana_—S.S. _Burhampooter_ and
_Hooghly_, 1828—Arrival in India of Lord William Bentinck as
Governor-General—His efforts to promote Steam Navigation—Voyages
of the S.S. _Hooghly_ up the Ganges 1828, 1829, and 1830—Other
vessels recommended to be built—Two of them of Iron—Steam
Companies formed, 1845—Steam Committee, 1857, and rapid
progress of steam-vessels from this date—Improved troop steamer
for the Lower Indus—Sea-going steamers of India—S.S. _John
Bright_—British India Steam Navigation Company established,
1857—Its fleet, and extent of its operations—Origin of this
company—Its early difficulties, and rapid extension—Number of
ships lost—Effect of the opening of the Suez Canal on the trade
of this Company—The _Holy Ship_, _note_—Netherlands Steam
Navigation Company, 1866—Its fleet, and how employed—Irrawaddy
Flotilla and Burmese Steam Navigation Company, 1865—Services
of this Company—Extent of inland trade—Fleet of the
Company—Interior trade of China—The Yang-tse-Kiang—Its source
and extent—Opened to trade, 1860—First steam-ship direct from
Hankow to England, 1863—Passage of the _Robert Lowe_ and her
cargo—Number of steamers employed on the Yang-tse 1864 and in
1875—S.S. _Hankow_—Her power and capacity, _note_—Chinese Steam
Navigation Company—Proposed Imperial fleet of steamers—Increase
of trade with China—The resources of the interior—Mode of
conducting business—“Hongs” or Guilds—Chinese Bankers—River and
coasting trade of China—Japanese line of steamers—How employed.
[Sidenote: First application of steam-vessels on the rivers and coasts
of India, 1825.]
[Sidenote: S.S. _Diana_.]
Encouraged by the success of the _Enterprize_, the Bengal Government
soon afterwards purchased another steamer, the _Diana_,[380] which
had been originally sent from England to China on speculation, and
despatched her to Amarapura, 500 miles up the River Irrawaddy, with
their then Resident in Burmah, Mr. Crawfurd, and his suite. As,
however, she sailed on her voyage in the month of September, when that
river is at its fullest, her progress not exceeding 30 miles each
day, caused considerable disappointment to the Indian Government. On
her return in the following month of December, she was again equally
unfortunate, for, by that time, the river had fallen so low, that,
partly owing to her draught of water, which was seldom less than 6
feet, and, partly, to the intricacy of a navigation, then imperfectly
known, her passage down the Irrawaddy was nearly as tedious.
[Sidenote: The S.S. _Burhampooter_ and _Hooghly_, 1828.]
As, however, this voyage was accomplished without accident, the value
of steamers for inland navigation was sufficiently shown to induce the
Indian Government to consider the desirability of constructing such
vessels for this special service; hence, an urgent application was soon
afterwards made to the Court of Directors for permission to build two
vessels, one for general service, and the other for the navigation of
the Burhampooter, on which, from the strength of the stream and the
prevalence of easterly winds, it was found that sailing-vessels could
not be depended on, for the supply of the large number of troops it was
necessary to maintain in the valley of Assam for some years after the
conquest of that country. So much delay, however, occurred before the
Court gave its consent, that these vessels were not ready for actual
service till the spring of 1828.[381]
[Sidenote: Arrival in India of Lord William Bentinck as
Governor-General.]
Lord William Bentinck, who arrived on July 3rd of that year at
Calcutta, as Governor-General of India, at once saw the immense
advantage to be derived from the employment of steam-vessels, and their
great value and economy in the rapid transport of troops and treasure,
as well into the interior as along the coasts of India.[382]
[Sidenote: His efforts to promote Steam Navigation.]
No arguments were required to convince him that the new steamer
despatched for service on the Burhampooter river, whence she had been
named, was of almost incalculable value, the troops in Assam being
not merely supplied more rapidly with the necessary stores, but their
number materially reduced, the use of steamers enabling the different
armies of India to be practically interchangeable with almost every
portion of the East. Consequently, Lord William Bentinck appointed a
committee to inquire into the description of steamers best suited for
the navigation of the rivers of India, and ordered the _Hooghly_, the
second vessel built, to explore the River Ganges as far as Allahabad, a
distance of 798 miles above Calcutta.
[Sidenote: Voyages of the S.S. _Hooghly_ up the Ganges, 1828, 1829, and
1830.]
The voyages of this vessel, under the command of Captain Johnston,
previously of the _Enterprize_, were perfectly successful, and clearly
showed that the Ganges could, for the whole of this distance, be
advantageously navigated by steamers. Although the _Hooghly_, from not
having the indispensable qualities of lightness of draught, capacity,
and speed, was not well adapted for so long and intricate a river
voyage, she made the passage to Allahabad at the average speed of
3½ miles an hour, against a current of from 3 to 4 miles, returning
thence at the rate of from 7 to even 12 miles an hour according to the
strength of the stream. Further experimental trips in the spring of
1829, and in January 1830, were equally successful.
[Sidenote: Other vessels recommended to be built.]
[Sidenote: Two of them of iron.]
In accordance with the recommendations of the Committee, two steamers
of about 270 tons burden, with engines of 70 to 80 horse-power,
were constructed as tug-boats for use on the river _Hooghly_; and
orders were sent to England for two others, better fitted than the
_Burhampooter_ and _Hooghly_, for the navigation of the Ganges or
other rivers. These vessels had, indeed, but partially met the wants of
the service, and, as it had been now discovered that vessels of less
draught could be made of iron, the Court of Directors were recommended
to order their construction of that material. They were to draw
not more than 2 feet of water; one to be a steam-tug, the other an
accommodation boat. Both were to be of the same dimensions, 120 feet
long, by 22 feet in width, and very flat-bottomed, which, indeed, was
absolutely necessary to secure the stipulated lightness of draught.
They were to have two engines of 30 horse-power each, with vibrating
cylinders, on account of their greater lightness. However, till the
result of the experiment made with these boats was known, the Directors
suspended their decision as to the building of more steam-vessels for
the navigation of the Upper Ganges and Burhampooter, as also for that
of the Indus and other rivers of the Punjâb.
In these early efforts, we have an approximation to what has since
been achieved on the rivers of India, presenting, as they did, a field
for inland navigation, realizable by steam-vessels with far more
advantageous results than could be obtained by the ordinary craft
of the country. The success of the first effort, in securing a high
power of engines as compared with the draught of water, led to the
construction, for similar purposes, of various other iron boats by Mr.
Laird, Messrs. Miller and Ravenshill, and Messrs. Forrester.
[Sidenote: Steam companies formed, 1845.]
[Sidenote: Steam committee of 1857, and rapid progress of steam vessels
from this date.]
Private enterprise, however, in this instance lagged behind
Government, as it was not till 1845 that any companies were formed
to conduct the trade of that country by means of steam-vessels. The
Tug Company of the Hooghly was among the first of these commercial
undertakings. The Bombay Steam Navigation Company followed, with four
paddle-wheel steamers, three of wood and one of iron, to trade between
Bombay and Ceylon on the one hand, and Karáchi on the other. But,
however great the advantages derivable from the use of steamers on the
rivers and coasts of India, their development, even then, was slow
compared with that of Great Britain or the United States. Although
starting early, and with energy, in the use of this new power, the
people and Government alike seem to have slumbered for nearly thirty
years, and to have been dreaming over its advantages: indeed, it was
not till 1857, when another committee had been appointed, and strongly
recommended the more extended use of steamers, that any very marked
progress was made. From that period, however, it has been very great,
I may say remarkable, more especially since the opening of the Suez
Canal. Since then, those ancient routes of maritime commerce which,
in the dawn of history, were first tracked by the Chaldeans and
Phœnicians, and, afterwards brought into a system by the greatest
and wisest of monarchs, have been, after the lapse of more than two
thousand years, re-opened by steam-ships, and this, too, almost along
the same course, which Solomon, in connection with Hiram, King of Tyre,
first established.
[Sidenote: Improved troop steamer for the Lower Indus.]
Among the finest vessels ordered by the Government of India after the
report of the committee had been considered, may be mentioned one
designed by Mr. T. B. Winter, C.E., for the navigation of the Lower
Indus. As she is very much the type of all the steamers now employed
for the conveyance of troops and passengers on the rivers of the East,
I may state that her design somewhat resembles (though with special
fittings adapted for the climate of India) the steamer, now employed
on the River Hudson, already described,[383] having accommodation for
800 soldiers and their officers in two tiers of cabins, one above the
other, built on the main-deck, and surrounded by verandahs and covered
with awnings as a protection from the scorching rays of the sun. The
sides of these deck-houses, consist almost entirely of Venetian blinds;
their frames and those of the berths being made of galvanized iron,
having between the frames sheets of perforated zinc so as to admit
a free circulation of air, while the whole range of these houses is
divided into five separate compartments so as to permit the separation
of the troops in case of sickness. By an ingenious contrivance an
abundant supply of fresh air is drawn from the paddle-boxes in order
that it may contain moisture, and is supplied to all the cabins by
means of fans, worked by the steam-engines of the ship in such a manner
that a sufficient quantity is provided to completely change, every
half-hour, the air in each troop-room. The draught of water of this
commodious and beautifully arranged vessel, aided by another ingenious
contrivance in connection with her rudder, does not exceed, when
laden, 2 feet, while her speed on her trial trip averaged close upon 12
statute miles the hour.[384]
[Sidenote: Sea-going steamers of India.]
[Sidenote: S.S. _John Bright_.]
Among the earliest commercial Ocean Steamers employed on the Eastern
seas, were, as noticed previously, those of the Peninsular and Oriental
Steam Navigation Company. For some years, at first, these vessels held
almost a monopoly of the passenger and of the most valuable portion of
the goods traffic. Competitors, however, soon arose, especially in the
opium trade, which had, hitherto, been conducted by sailing clippers
celebrated for their speed, many of which vessels, owned by English
merchants resident in Hong Kong, had proved a large source of profit to
their too enterprising owners. But, now, the whole of this trade, as
well as a considerable portion of the traffic between Calcutta, Bombay
and the Chinese ports, is carried on by very fast steamers, owned
partly by English and partly by native merchants. A few years ago, one
of the finest of these vessels was the property, entirely, of Parsees
resident at Bombay, and, as she bore the honoured name of the _John
Bright_,[385] it is to be hoped that opium constituted but a small
portion of her cargo. I mention her, however, as a fair specimen of the
steamers thus employed, both as regards speed and dimensions, and, for
the information of my readers, I may state that she was built of iron
by Messrs. C. J. Mare and Co., of Millwall, in 1862, and that she made
the voyage from Gravesend (calling at the Cape of Good Hope) to Bombay
in fifty-eight days, and thence to Hong Kong, with a full cargo, and
against the monsoons, in twenty-two days.[386]
[Sidenote: British India Steam Navigation Company established, 1857.]
[Sidenote: Its fleet and extent of its operations.]
Much the most important commercial maritime company, however, now
engaged in the coasting trade of the East, is the British India Steam
Navigation Company (Limited), which commenced business in 1857 under
the title of the Calcutta and Burmah Steam Navigation Company, with a
line of steamers between Calcutta, Akyab, Rangoon, and Moulmein. In
1862, the name of the company was changed to its present designation,
its operations having been extended along the coasts of India and
Persia, so as to embrace, at the present time, a continuous coasting
service between Singapore on the one hand, and the island of Zanzibar
on the other, with an extension from the latter port to the French
settlements of Mayotte, Nossi Bé, and Majunga. The fleet of this
company now consists of forty-two iron screw-steamers, varying in size
from 350 to 2600 tons gross register, their aggregate gross tonnage
being about 57,000, employed on thirteen different lines,[387] showing
the vast extent of commercial intercourse now maintained by the vessels
of this one undertaking alone.
One is amazed at the rapidity of the growth of steam-ship companies
throughout the world, within the last quarter of this century. It seems
only the other day when Mr. Mackinnon of Glasgow, a merchant engaged
in the trade with India and the founder and managing director, as well
as one of the chief owners of this large fleet of steamers, mentioned
to the author his intention of running a couple of small steam-vessels
between Calcutta and Burmah. Nor was he then very sanguine of success.
With the shrewdness, however, characteristic of his countrymen, he
saw, beyond the difficulties he would have to encounter (which men of
his determination and perseverance alone know how to overcome), an
important and valuable opening for the employment of steamers, and
having overcome every obstacle, his hopes have been more than realized;
indeed, much sooner and to a far larger extent, than he or any one else
could at the first have anticipated.
[Sidenote: Origin of this company.]
This now important undertaking had its origin in an advertisement by
the East India Company in 1855, for steam-vessels to convey the mails
between Calcutta and Burmah, a service hitherto conducted by their own
vessels, the _Enterprize_ being the first to do so. Mr. Mackinnon and
his partners, having agreed to accept the contract, despatched for its
fulfilment the _Baltic_ and _Cape of Good Hope_, but these vessels,
being unsuitable for the purpose, and having made long and expensive
passages to India, their enterprising owners would have suffered a
heavy loss by them, had they not, soon after their arrival, been
engaged for the transport of troops at the outbreak of the mutiny.
[Sidenote: Its early difficulties, and rapid extension.]
Nor was the new company more fortunate with the first vessels they
built on the Clyde for this trade. One of these, the _Calcutta_, of
900 tons, was totally wrecked off the coast of Wicklow soon after
she left Greenock, while another, the _Cape of Good Hope_, was sunk
in the Hooghly, having come into collision with one of the steamers
of the Peninsular and Oriental Company. The losses thus sustained
were, however, vigorously overcome; other new vessels were supplied
and, in 1862, a fresh contract was entered into with the Government
of India, including conditions for the transport of troops and stores
at a mileage rate, and for the conveyance of the mails, not merely
every fortnight, between Calcutta, Akyab, Rangoon, and Moulmein, but
also once a month, _viâ_ the two latter ports, to Singapore; a similar
service to Chittagong and Akyab; another to the Andaman Islands in the
Bay of Bengal; a fortnightly one between Bombay and Karáchí; another,
once a month, between Madras and Rangoon; and a further service, every
six weeks, to various ports in the Persian Gulf, along nearly the same
route Nearchus had followed three centuries before the Christian era.
Improving prospects now accompanied this spirited undertaking at every
stage of its rapid progress. Steam here, as it has done everywhere
else, opened up fresh branches of commerce, developed others, or gave
new life to occupations for ages dormant, conferring, by its civilizing
influence, immense benefits on the dense and often poverty-stricken and
oppressed inhabitants of lands at once envied and far-famed.
[Sidenote: Number of ships lost.]
As might have been anticipated, the British India Steam Navigation
Company met with various losses, in the development of so extensive
a range of services; but, though the wreck of their _Burmah_ on the
Madras coast, the loss of the _Bussorah_ on her voyage to India, the
stranding of the _Coringa_ in the harbour of Muskát, and the foundering
of the _Persia_ on her voyage from Rangoon to Calcutta, during one of
these fearful cyclones which, periodically, sweep the Indian Ocean,
crippled for a time the resources and retarded the operations of the
company, they did not quell the spirit or even damp the energies of
Mr. Mackinnon and his co-directors, who thus, at last, achieved that
success which industry and perseverance, in the right direction, must
ever command.
[Sidenote: Effect of the opening of the Suez Canal on the trade of this
company.]
The opening of the Suez Canal, in 1869, gave renewed vigour to the
company. While producing an entire revolution in the shipping trade
of India, it afforded facilities for its economical conduct, hitherto
unknown. Of these the directors at once took advantage, and their
steamer _India_, requiring new boilers, was the first vessel to arrive
in London with a cargo of Indian produce, through the new maritime
highway, which the genius and energy of Lesseps had constructed across
the barren isthmus of the land of the Pharaohs.
In 1873, the company entered into still more extended arrangements with
the Government of India, by doubling some of its existing lines, and,
in 1872, the directors arranged with the Home Government to organize a
mail service every four weeks, between Aden and Zanzibar, on the east
coast of Africa, so that the distance annually traversed under its
contracts, now exceeds 1,100,000 miles.
In tracing the different lines used by the vessels of this company, it
is interesting, as I have just mentioned, to note that their courses,
especially those along the Arabian shore of the Red Sea, the eastern
coast of Africa, the coasts of Hadramaut and Persia as far as Bussorah,
and by way of Beluchistan and the western shores of India as far as
Ceylon, are, as nearly as possible, the same as those which, from the
scanty records of the past, I have endeavoured to trace on a map, so as
to show the ancient routes of commerce pursued by native vessels long
before the Christian era.[388]
[Sidenote: Netherlands Steam Navigation Company, 1866.]
[Sidenote: Its fleet, and how employed.]
In 1863, the Dutch East India Government offered a liberal subsidy
for the conveyance of their mails in the East, but, as one of the
conditions of the contract required the steamers so engaged to be
under the Dutch flag, the requisite capital would not have been
raised had not the shareholders of the British India Steam Navigation
Company, individually, supplied the greater portion of it for this new
undertaking. In 1866, the Netherlands India Steam Navigation Company
commenced operations, having for its directors many of the members of
the board of the English Company, but, in all other respects, distinct.
These two companies, however, work together in perfect harmony, and
now carry on between them a large portion of the maritime commerce of
the East. The Netherlands Company owns twenty-three steamers of an
aggregate of 20,000 tons, interchanging their traffic at Singapore,
with the vessels of the British India Company, and extending their
operations from that place and Batavia to the principal ports in the
Dutch East Indies, and, again, thence, through Torres Straits to
Brisbane, Sydney, and Melbourne, thus affording another line of steam
communication to our Australian colonies, along the whole of the shores
of which regular steam communication is now maintained.
But perhaps the most extraordinary, and certainly not the least
interesting, inland route for steamers (the Ganges and the Indus not
excepted), is the navigation of the River Irrawaddy through Burmah
to the confines of China, a route greatly developed of recent years.
It was, as I have stated, on this river, that the second steamer, the
_Diana_, belonging to the East India Company, made her first voyage,
and, from that time until 1865, the Government of India maintained,
with more or less regularity, communication by their own steamers
between Calcutta, Rangoon, and Upper Burmah, as far as Mandalay, a city
said to contain at one time half a million of inhabitants, and situated
on the banks of the Irrawaddy, about 500 miles from the sea.
[Sidenote: Irrawaddy Flotilla and Burmese Steam Navigation Company,
1865.]
Finding, as Governments often do in such undertakings, that the
receipts from this line of communication fell very far short of the
disbursements, they, in 1865, made a contract with the Irrawaddy
Flotilla and Burmese Steam Navigation Company, constituted under the
Limited Liability Act “for the conveyance of H.M.’s troops, stores,
and mails to the different stations of British Burmah on the River
Irrawaddy, and for carrying on general traffic between the towns
and villages on that river from Rangoon to Mandalay, the capital of
Upper Burmah,”[389] at the same time making over to the company four
Government steamers and three flats previously engaged in the river
service. But these vessels, having been found altogether unsuited for
the successful carrying on of the company’s operations, were soon
replaced by other and new vessels, better fitted for the efficient and
economical performance of this service.
[Sidenote: Services of this Company.]
When the original contract with the Indian Government expired in 1868,
the company entered into a fresh agreement, whereby its services were
extended from Mandalay to Bhamo, 1000 miles by river from Rangoon,
and within 50 miles of the Chinese frontier. Bhamo, for centuries
celebrated among the inland commercial cities of the East, was, at one
time, the depôt of an enormous import and export trade to and from
western China, conveyed by trains of caravans between that city and
Yunnan, the south-western province of the Celestial Empire. But, though
long-continued rebellions and civil wars have almost extirpated this
important traffic, it has of recent years received a fresh impulse by
the introduction of improved steam communication on the Irrawaddy,
and by the efforts of English merchants, supported by Government,
to explore the country and to re-open vast fields of wealth long
comparatively unproductive.[390]
[Sidenote: Extent of inland trade.]
Previously to the establishment of steam communication, the trade of
the Irrawaddy, studded along its whole length with towns and villages,
with a dense, active, and industrious population, was conducted by
native craft of various kinds, whose number has been estimated at
25,000. But steam-vessels, by their speed, regularity, and safety, are
gradually superseding these native craft, which, in time, will become,
as they have done everywhere else, simply auxiliaries to that great
power which, in so large a measure, now regulates the commerce of the
world.
[Sidenote: Fleet of the company.]
The fleet of the Irrawaddy Company now consists (1st of January, 1875)
of fifteen steamers and twenty-five “flats,” the whole built expressly
for this trade. The steamers, resembling in many respects (though they
are inferior in size) those employed on the Ganges and the Indus, are
about 250 feet in length, with 32 feet beam, and only 8½ feet depth
of hold. They are built of iron, and their draught of water, with 100
tons of fuel on board, is 3 feet 9 inches. They do not take any cargo,
but only passengers, having accommodation for thirty first-class, and
from 250 to 300 steerage or native passengers; but each steamer tows a
couple of flats or barges fastened on either side. The steamers have
engines of 250 nominal horse-power, and can attain a speed of fourteen
knots an hour, in still water, and without anything in tow. Though
their hold is only 8½ feet in depth, the houses and awning-deck rise
to about 18 feet above their hull. The largest of the barges is 195
feet in length, with a beam of 25 feet, and can each carry 300 tons
measurement of cargo, weighing about 160 tons, with a draught of not
more than 3 feet of water.
There is now a weekly steam service between Rangoon and Mandalay, while
every month a steamer ascends to Bhamo, which, though now a wretched
place of not more than 75,000 inhabitants, may yet be restored by means
of steamers to something approaching its former importance. As the
delta of the Irrawaddy embraces an area of 94,000 square miles, with
an alluvial and fertile soil throughout, producing in great abundance
rice, cotton, cutch, teak, minerals, and mineral oils, and, as not
more than 3000 miles of this rich district of country is as yet under
cultivation, it presents an enormous field for the development of
maritime and other branches of commerce.
[Sidenote: Interior trade of China.]
But, as we proceed further to the East, we find still larger and richer
fields gradually being opened out by means of steamers. In China there
are vast regions with teeming millions of industrious people who could
never have been reached by the traders of Europe and America without
the intervention of steam; countries hitherto unknown, yet exhibiting
a high state of civilization. With all the necessaries and many of the
luxuries of life, their inhabitants have little or no knowledge of
any other country beyond their own: favoured by a superior soil and
excellent climate, they have, however, become rich by their own genius
and unwearied industry: not one out of every hundred thousand of those
in the interior having ever seen the ocean, and knowing as little about
England as the people of ancient India knew about Greece, Babylonia,
and Macedonia when Alexander made his celebrated march across the
Panjâb. Nor, indeed, are the descriptions of its civilization, wealth,
and refinement, as given to us by occasional travellers who have
penetrated the interior, wholly unlike those Arrian has handed down to
posterity, with reference to the great cities of ancient India.
[Sidenote: The Yang-tse-Kiang.]
If my readers will take the trouble to glance over a map of China
and trace the windings of the great Yang-tse-Kiang to its outlet near
Shanghai, they will see the extent of territory watered by this mighty
stream, together with its various navigable branches. Rising in the
southern slope of north-eastern Tibet, and, thence, flowing to the
south-east, the Yang-tse at first passes through a country of lofty
snow-covered mountains, the drainage of which in warm weather largely
increases the volume of its waters, and produces at the same time,
in great measure, the vast floods which, in the months of July and
August, inundate the widely extending valleys near Hankow and the lower
portions of the river.[391]
[Sidenote: Its source and extent.]
From these mountain ranges, the Yang-tse winds its way through
others of less magnitude and through fertile plains for 800 miles
to Chong-kin-foo, forming the northern boundary of the provinces of
Yunnan and Kweichow, and greatly increased in its volume by various
tributary streams, two of which are of considerable magnitude. Through
the province of Szchuen its course extends, for many hundred miles,
in a north and north-easterly direction. Thence, passing onwards
through numerous gorges and passes, at present altogether unnavigable,
it debouches on the plain of Hupeh, where it is about half a mile in
breadth; thence again, it proceeds for about 250 miles to Yo-choo-foo,
at the Lake Tongting, where the upper Yang-tse ends, and where the
lower or greater river of the same name, commencing its course, passes
the important city of Hankow, receiving near this city the waters of
the Han river, its greatest tributary, and the Chin-kiang: at this
place, it is a mile and a half wide, but, at its mouth, near Shanghai,
the Yang-tse extends to a width of 12 miles, its whole course being
upwards of 3000 miles in length.
This great river is subject periodically to floods, some of these, as
that of 1870, converting the country for miles on either bank into a
vast sea submerging many villages, whose position can only be traced by
the roofs of the houses, as the highways are by the tops of the willow
trees lining them.
[Sidenote: Opened to trade, 1860.]
[Sidenote: First steam-ship direct from Hankow to England, 1863.]
In February 1860, the Yang-tse was for the first time opened (by
treaty) to the ships of other nations; and one of my own, the
_Scotland_, an iron auxiliary screw steam-ship of about 1100 tons
gross register, commanded by Captain A. D. Dundas, R.N., was the first
foreign merchant-vessel[392] which loaded a cargo from Shanghai to
Hankow,[393] bringing back teas for transhipment to Europe and America;
but it was not until 1863 that any English vessel loaded a cargo direct
from Hankow for Great Britain. On the 8th May of that year, another of
my auxiliary steam-ships, the _Robert Lowe_, of 1250 tons, commanded
by William Congalton, left Shanghai for Hankow for the purpose of
loading a cargo of teas direct for London: two other English vessels
had, however, preceded her.
[Sidenote: Passage of the _Robert Lowe_ and her cargo.]
The navigation of this river was then very little known, and there were
many difficulties to encounter which have since been removed; under
these circumstances, and as the engines of the _Robert Lowe_ were only
80 nominal horse-power, her passage between Shanghai and Hankow, a
distance of 608 miles, occupied ten days: one day, however, was lost
in changing her propeller, while she had to anchor every night. The
current against her averaged three knots an hour, but in some parts ran
fully five knots. The least depth of water (the river being then at its
ordinary height) found by soundings was 4¾ fathoms on the bar of the
Longshan crossing: the average depth being from 8 to 9 fathoms, but, in
many places, Captain Congalton did not obtain soundings at a depth of
14 fathoms, and, in long reaches, where the waters were contracted, the
depths were from 20 to 30 fathoms.
At Hankow, where the _Robert Lowe_ anchored to receive her cargo (about
300 yards from the bank), the depth of water was 14 fathoms, with a
current running at the rate of 3½ knots an hour. The new teas generally
arrive in boats (chops) about the 10th of June, and, on the 23rd of
that month, she sailed with a full cargo[394] for Shanghai and London.
She was fifty-seven hours under weigh on her passage from Hankow to
Shanghai; the current, the river being then fuller, running at from
four to, in some places, seven knots an hour.
[Sidenote: Number of steamers employed on the Yang-tse, 1864, and in
1875.]
In 1863-4 there were nine steamers employed trading between Hankow
and Shanghai, five British and four American, some of these having a
capacity for 2000 tons of tea, and all of them vessels of great speed.
Sailing all night as well as during the day, they, in fine weather,
made the passage to Hankow in four days, returning under favourable
circumstances in less than half that time. Freights then ranged either
way, from 3_l._ to 4_l._ per ton, treble what they are now, but the
current expenses were very heavy, arising from the high price of coal,
an increased scale of wages, and exorbitant port charges. Since 1864,
the trade has greatly increased both in goods and passengers, large
numbers of emigrants are now conveyed in the steamers from the interior
to the coast, whence they embark for voyages, many of them so distant
as California, the Mauritius, and the West Indies.[395]
[Sidenote: S.S. _Hankow_.]
There are few finer steamers to be found in any part of the world
than the _Hankow_[396] (belonging to Messrs. Swire and Company),
now employed in the trade of the Yang-tse. (See illustration, page
471.) Steamers of her type now leave Hankow and Shanghai daily—one
despatched by Russell and Company, the other by Butterfield and Swire,
by whom the bulk of the carrying trade between these places is now
conducted in steamers.
[Illustration: S.S. “HANKOW” AND “PEKIN.”]
[Sidenote: Chinese Steam Navigation Company.]
But the most interesting fact connected with the maritime progress of
the Chinese has been the establishment of a line of steam-ships by
a company of Chinese merchants, and under their own flag. Although
shares are held by the Chinese in many of the other steamers, it is
worthy of note that the vessels of this company are owned almost, if
not exclusively, by them. But it is still more remarkable, that a
scheme for a Chinese naval reserve is now being arranged in connection
with the “China Merchants Steam Navigation Company.”[397] It is
proposed that each of the larger provinces shall furnish two steamers,
and the smaller provinces one, to be added to the fleet of that
company, and employed by it while the country is at peace, but to be
at the service of the Imperial Government in the event of war.[398]
This undertaking, which would appear to have received the approval of
the Emperor, will, when complete, consist of twenty-eight steamers,
one of which, it is said, has been already ordered in England. It will
be, indeed, an era in the history of China when an ancient nation,
so exclusive and conservative, substitutes for its junks[399] the
steam-ships of modern nations alike for war and commerce.
[Sidenote: Proposed imperial fleet of steamers.]
As there is perhaps no more interesting incident in the history of
merchant shipping, than the change now being made in the vessels of the
Chinese Empire the following drawing of one of their finest tea-boats
(“soma”)[400] may not be uninteresting to my readers; the more so, as
I have reason to believe that vessels almost as perfect and ornamental
as this one might have been found navigating the coasts and rivers of
China even before the dawn of history, and, that they have remained
almost unchanged till now, when they are about to be displaced by the
steam-ships of Europe, is an event of unusual significance in the
progress of ancient nations.
[Illustration: CHINESE TEA-BOAT.]
[Sidenote: Increase of trade with China.]
[Sidenote: The resources of the interior.]
Though our export trade with China has of late years materially
increased, a still greater increase may be anticipated if steamers
are placed on the upper waters of the Yang-tse, and still more so if
Europeans are allowed to trade direct with the dense population of
the interior. That such results may be hoped for is clear from the
fact that, wherever the merchants of Europe and America have settled,
Chinese merchants have been greatly enriched by this intercourse; they
have, in fact, found, as the Germans did when the Hanseatic League
commenced their exclusive commercial operations in Europe centuries
ago, that new traders brought with them new sources of wealth, and
developed channels of trade hitherto unknown or at least unrecognised;
a result naturally to be expected in a country, such as China,
producing within itself, and in extraordinary abundance, some of the
most valuable articles known to commerce, at a comparatively small
expenditure of either labour or capital. Thus, silk, in most of the
provinces of China, is produced by the labour of the women and children
alone, the trees occupying the place of no other crops. _Insect_
wax, another article of a high marketable value, is also produced at
a trifling expense; while the opium crops of the interior probably
cost less in labour than any other that has to be annually sown and
reaped.[401]
But beyond these, China produces in vast abundance numerous other
articles, necessaries as well as luxuries of life, in great demand in
every part of the world. Apart, for instance, from the staple article,
tea, which no civilized nation can now dispense with, and silk, which
increases in demand with the wealth of nations, and is even more sought
after now than it was when the Roman Empire had reached the plenitude
of its grandeur, the western provinces of this much more ancient
empire, especially that of Szchuen, produce rice and other grain crops
in astonishing natural luxuriance, and these would be cultivated to
a far greater extent than they now are, if increased facilities were
afforded for their export. Already tobacco, sugar, hemp, and tung oil,
are sent to the coast in large quantities from Szchuen, and form, even
without the means of interchange with foreign nations, a source of
ready-made wealth as the mere bounty of nature. Hence, the inhabitants
are generally rich, except in districts where the population is too
dense, or where they are exposed to undue extortion, owing to the
avarice of the authorities. In Szchuen, as also in Yunnan and in many
other provinces, the agricultural population is well off; the farms
are large; the heads of families being as well dressed as merchants in
great cities; the women too, as a rule, are “richly attired, and the
appearances of many of the rustic villages and large farms convey the
impression of a perpetual holiday.”[402]
“Coal is worked on the hills in the neighbourhood of Chungking, and
affords employment to the people of the villages, who make a kind of
patent fuel of it, for which they find a market at Ichang, as well
as in the smaller towns in the neighbourhood.”[403] Cotton is also
produced in abundance; and “among the agricultural population of
Szchuen, the women and children, as well as old men, employ themselves
in spinning and weaving it, not only for their own wants but also for
sale in the towns.”[404] “The people of Chungking,” the delegates
state,[405] “expressed great readiness to trade with us, and seemed
surprised that we did not bring goods for sale. Foreign merchants will
undoubtedly be well received whenever they may choose, or be permitted,
to go there.”
[Sidenote: Mode of conducting business.]
The native merchants of the interior of China appear to be keen
traders; but, probably, it would be necessary for foreigners, in
their first intercourse with them, to do their business through the
established _hongs_, who are united in powerful guilds, resembling
those so general in Europe, a few centuries ago, with a similar
reputation of tyranny over all smaller dealers, and a tenacity in
everything affecting their own privileges. Nearly all the important
branches of trade in the interior are now under the control of these
guilds, or associated _hongs_, who are responsible to the authorities
for the duties leviable, with a power of regulating particular trades
recognised by the Government.
[Sidenote: “Hongs” or guilds.]
[Sidenote: Chinese bankers.]
It is curious to find in distant parts of the world, so remote,
indeed, that the inhabitants know nothing of any portion of the globe
beyond the confines of China, nor, with rare exceptions, have ever
heard of any country but their own, the same rules for the regulation
of commerce as were general throughout Europe in the sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries;[406] even their banking system having much
resemblance to that of Europe. In China, the custom prevails of making
large deductions from the weight or nominal price of goods, for cash
payments; the ordinary credit, according to ancient habit, being from
six to twelve months, or even more. Negotiation of drafts is managed
by bankers, mostly by Shansi men, who profess relationship with every
important place in China, as the Lombards once did in Europe.
Prior to the Tae Ping rebellion, Hankow claimed to have a complete,
and, by all accounts, a wealthy banking system, the smallest of the
banks, called Yin-hongs, having subscribed capitals of many thousands,
while the Shansi exchange-houses (Piaw Hoo) counted their wealth by
hundreds of thousands. At that time, a great deal of the spare capital
of the north found its way to this city, where it was lent at rates not
greatly in excess of those now current in England; but, during the
rebellion, the Shansi exchange houses withdrew their capital, while the
mandarins made such heavy levies on the smaller banks, that most of
these establishments were closed, and “cash shops” were, for some time,
the only medium of banking operations. These, however, have now assumed
more important functions than that of mere exchange, and two of them
have become, though still retaining the name of cash shops, banking
establishments of considerable importance. These banks frequently make
the necessary advances to the growers of the teas produced in such
abundance in this district, though the bulk of the capital employed in
this now vast trade is provided by the English and American merchants,
many of whom have houses at Hankow.
[Sidenote: River and coasting trade of China.]
Though the most valuable portions of the trade between Hankow and
the sea-coast is now conducted by steamers, native sailing-craft of
various sorts are still the only means of water transport, on the
upper Yang-tse, which is navigable for vessels drawing not more than
eight feet of water as far as Ichang, 363 miles above Hankow. As many
as 800 of these vessels, averaging about 50 tons each,[407] have been
counted at one time in the harbour of Shansi alone. Their crews,
like the boatmen of the Nile, are a special class of men, trained
to the service, whose forefathers, through many generations, have
followed a similar calling. They are a hardy race, and manage their
rude craft with considerable adroitness. Besides these, lorchas, under
various foreign flags, running in competition with the steamers, find
profitable employment in the conveyance of bulky and low-priced produce
and merchandise between Shanghai and Hankow, while the river below the
latter place is still frequented by large fleets of native vessels,
independently of the crafts engaged in the salt trade, which make the
short voyage to places above Ching-Kiang; sea-going junks also find
their way up to Taiping and Woohoo.[408]
Soon after the opening of the trade to foreigners, the sea-going
junks employed in the trade of the coast were opposed by small
sailing-vessels from other nations, more especially from Germany and
the northern ports of Europe. Many brigs, schooners, and barques, of
from 150 to 400 tons, were also sent from England to engage in the
trade, but these, as well as the sea-going junks, are now in turn being
displaced by steamers which traverse almost every part of the Chinese
seas, as far as Japan, where some of them run in connection with the
great English and American lines, and ere long they will, no doubt,
cover the more remote inland waters of the Empire.
[Sidenote: Japanese line of steamers.]
But the Japanese, as well as the Chinese, have now various merchant
steamers under their own flag; they have, also, their iron-clads,
the first of which was built by Hall, of Aberdeen; and they own the
_Stonewall_ (originally built in England for the Confederate States),
which they used to advantage in their civil war of 1868-69. Their
first steamer of any kind was the _Emperor_ yacht, presented to them
by Lord Elgin on the occasion of making the commercial treaty in
1858-59. Unlike their great neighbours, the Chinese, who were slow to
adopt European customs, and who for ages preferred their clumsy junks
to the finest sailing-vessels of the East India Company, the Japanese
have, since 1859, become owners of steamers with astonishing rapidity;
a fact the more noteworthy, that, though their country presents many
inducements to maritime pursuits, their native population do not seem
at any period of their history to have been a maritime people. Indeed,
they were not encouraged by their laws to become so. On the contrary,
they were restricted to both form and size in the construction of their
junks, with the object, it is presumed, of preventing their leaving
Japan for foreign countries; hence these vessels are, as a rule, the
rudest of sea-going craft. Invariably rigged with a single mast, and
one great square sail which reefs down, curtailed, when required, by
the lowering of the yard; they are, however, sometimes to be found
encountering, in these unwieldy craft, heavy gales, and at unexpected
distances from home.[409]
[Sidenote: How employed.]
But the eyes of the Japanese have been recently opened to the
advantages of foreign trade,[410] and they are moving onwards in a
manner which could hardly have been anticipated from what is known of
their previous history; indeed, they have recently (February 1875)
announced the establishment of a regular line of steamers under the
Japanese flag. The shares of this undertaking, which they have named
the “Mitsu-Bishi Steam Navigation Company,” are held almost, if not
exclusively, by Japanese. This company already possesses four steamers,
the _Tokio-Murin_ (late _New York_), the _Kunayana-Murin_ (late
_Madras_), the _Takar-Murin_ (late _Acanthia_), and the _Zazon_, while
others are in course of construction in Great Britain, which are to
form a “weekly line” between China and their own ports of Nagasaki,
Hiogo, Imioseki, and Yokohama.
What an advance on the rude craft of which the following is an
illustration![411]
[Illustration]
When we consider the enterprising character of the Japanese, we cannot
but feel surprised that such vessels as this clumsy hulk, should, in
spite of their restrictive laws, have been found sufficient for all
their wants, and that through countless ages. But now the spirit of
progress in maritime affairs guides their councils, and though, at
present, their steamers are commanded by Europeans or Americans, and
have foreign engineers, in other respects they are manned by Japanese.
Ere long the junks, alike of China and Japan, will be things of the
past, strange toys to the children of these countries, as they have
long been to the children of Europe.
FOOTNOTES:
[380] The _Diana_ was sent out first in 1821 for Mr. Robarts,
with the view to employment in the Canton river. She had a pair
of 16 horse-power engines by Maudslay. At Calcutta she was nearly
reconstructed by Messrs. Kyd and Co., and launched again on July 12,
1823.
The first actual steam-boat of which we have any record, in connection
with India, was built at Batavia, shortly after the conclusion of
the Java war in 1810-11. She was called the _Van der Capellen_, and
was built at the expense of English merchants. She was engaged by
Government for two years at the cost of 10,000 dollars a month, which
well repaid the original outlay on her. She proved very effective for
the transport of troops, &c. After some years she came into the hands
of Major Schalch and was used by him, under the name of the _Pluto_,
as a dredging-boat in 1822. Thence she went to Arrakan as a floating
battery. She was afterwards lost in a gale in 1830.
In 1819, Mr. W. Trickett built a small steam-boat of 8 horse-power at
the Butterley Works, for the Nawâb of Oude, to ply on the Jumna. “Early
Steam Navigation to India,” by G. A. Prinsep, Calcutta, 4to, 1830.)
[381] These vessels were named the _Burhampooter_ and _Hooghly_; they
were each 105 feet in length and 18 feet in breadth. Each had two
engines, which were sent from England, of the combined nominal power
of 50 horses, but working up to 80 horse-power on a consumption of 709
pounds of coal per hour.
[382] Previous to 1828, owing to the bad state of the Ganges, arising
from the sand-banks and heavy floods, against which native genius and
native boats were unable successfully to contend, communication with
the interior was alike slow and expensive. Thus, it took two and a-half
months to go from Calcutta to Benares; three and a-half to Caunpore;
six to Agra; and seven and a-half to Delhi. The premium of insurance
on a voyage from Calcutta to Caunpore was 3½ per cent.—as much as to
England. Treasure, too, and other valuable property was constantly lost
by the upsetting of the boats.
[383] See ante, vol. iv. p. 145.
[384] This vessel was built by Messrs. M. Pearce and Company, of
Stockton-on-Tees, and her principal dimensions are as follows: length
over all, 377 feet; beam, 46; breadth over paddle-boxes, 74; depth of
hold, 5 feet; working draught of water, 2 feet; displacement at 2-feet
draught, 739 tons. The engines (built by Messrs. James Watt and Co., of
London and Birmingham) are 220 nominal horse-power, having horizontal
cylinders of 55 inches diameter, and 6-feet stroke, and the diameter
of the paddle-wheels is 26 feet. The hull of the vessel is constructed
of puddled steel, and is strengthened longitudinally by four arched
girders, two of which carry the paddle-wheels, while the other two run
fore and aft, extending nearly the whole length of the ship. Similar
means are employed for strengthening the vessel athwartships. She is
steered at each end by means of “blades,” which, instead of being
worked from side to side in the ordinary manner of rudders, are made to
rise out of, or lower into, the water at the proper angle. Both sets
of these “steering-blades” are worked simultaneously, but provision is
made to work one set only, should an accident occur to the other.
[385] The _John Bright_ is clipper form, barque rig, and fitted
with the screw. Her dimensions are 250 feet in length between the
perpendiculars: breadth 31 feet, and depth 22 feet 6 inches. She is
propelled by engines of 250 horse-power nominal; and is 1192 tons
builders’ measurement.
[386] The earliest, as well as at that time, the fastest steamers
employed in the opium trade between Calcutta and China were the _Fiery
Cross_, and the _Lancefield_, built on the Clyde, and owned by Messrs.
Jardine, Matheson, and Company. These vessels invariably called at
Singapore on their way to Hong Kong, where they waited for despatches
from England by the steamers of the Peninsular and Oriental Steam
Navigation Company. Thus the owners of these vessels, which were much
faster than the Mail boats, not merely realized large profits in their
regular trade, but, with earlier information from home, than their
competitors, had a great advantage in all other branches of commerce,
as well as in that of opium.
[387] Lines of communication maintained by the steamers of the British
India Steam Navigation Company (Limited): Line 1. Between Calcutta,
Chittagong, Akyab, and Kyouk Phyoo, fortnightly. 2. Between Calcutta,
Akyab, and Rangoon, fortnightly. 3. Between Calcutta, Rangoon, and
Moulmein, weekly. 4. Between Calcutta, Chittagong, Akyab, Kyouk
Phyoo, Sandoway, Bassein, Rangoon, Moulmein, Tavoy, Mergui Pakchan,
Kopah, Junkseylon, Penang, Malacca, and Singapore, every four weeks.
5. Between Moulmein, Penang, Malacca, and Singapore, fortnightly. 6.
Between Calcutta, Port Blair, Camorta, and Rangoon, fourweekly. 7.
Between Madras and northern ports to Rangoon, fortnightly. 8. Between
Calcutta and Bombay, calling at ports in the Coromandel and Malabar
coast ports, weekly. 9. Between Bombay and Karáchí, twice a week. 10.
Between Bombay, Karáchí, Muskat, Bunder Abbas, Linga, Bushire, and
Bussorah, weekly. 11. Between London, Lisbon, Algiers, Red Sea ports,
Karáchí, and Persian Gulf, every four weeks. 12. Between Aden and
Zanzibar every four weeks. 13. Between Zanzibar, Mayotte, Nossi Bé,
Majunga, Mozambique, and other East African ports, every four weeks.
[388]
[Sidenote: The _Holy Ship_.]
See Frontispiece, first volume of this work. Without entering into the
vexed question of the antiquity of Indian naval architecture, it is
certain that native-built vessels, dedicated to commercial purposes,
have always been constructed with considerable skill and possess
remarkable _durability_. One of these vessels, built in Surat, called
the _Holy Ship_, as she was employed by the Muhammedans in going to and
returning from Mecca on their pilgrimage from India, though, so far
back as 1702, she was described as the _Old Ship_, continued to make
an annual voyage for three-quarters of a century, subsequently, from
Surat to Mocha, where her owners had the special privilege of taking on
board a certain number of chests and cases of coffee and other produce,
a privilege the more valuable, as the export duties were excessive. The
_Holy Ship_ was lost at last in a violent afflux of the river at Surat
in the year 1777, but there is reason to believe that she had navigated
the Indian seas for much more than a century, thus proving the
superiority of her construction, and the durability of her timbers and
planking. In constructing such vessels, the planks are not put together
in the European manner, with flat edges towards each other, but they
are rabbeted, and the parts are made to fit into each other with the
greatest exactness, much time and attention being bestowed upon this
operation. For this purpose the builders smear the edges of the planks,
as they are set up, with red lead, and those which are intended to be
placed next, are put upon them and pressed down, in order to be able to
discern the inequalities which are marked by the red lead. These are
afterwards removed, and the test is repeated, until the whole exactly
fits; they then rub both edges with a sort of glue, which becomes by
age as hard as iron, and they cover this with a thin layer of capoc,
after which they unite the planks so firmly, and closely with pegs,
that the seam is scarcely visible, and the entire frame seems to form
one single piece of timber. The beams and ribs are fitted in the same
way to the planks, so that a piece of wood is sometimes put in and
taken out more than ten times before it is finally fixed. The knees,
or crooked timbers, are generally by natural growth of the bent form
required, without being forced or warped by fire, especially where
special care is taken in the construction and no expense spared.
Instead of bolts, pieces of iron are used, forged like spikes, the
point of which is driven through, clenched on the inside, and again
driven into the wood. The iron employed for this purpose is previously
made very rough and flexible. A peculiar method is also employed for
the preservation of ships’ bottoms, by occasionally rubbing them with
an oil, called wood-oil, whereby the planks, imbibing this preparation,
are greatly nourished and protected from decay.
[389] Mr. James Galbraith, the managing director of this company, is
in every respect competent to carry out with success this interesting
and important undertaking. He is the chief partner of the firm of
Messrs. P. Henderson and Co., of Glasgow, and the senior partner of
the firm of Messrs. Galbraith, Stringer, Pembroke and Co., of 8 Austin
Friars, London—successors to the firm of W. S. Lindsay and Co., which
I established, and from which I retired in 1862.
[390] It was in these researches that Mr. Margary, of the China
consular service, a young gentleman of great enterprise and promise,
recently (February 1875) lost his life, and where, also, various
employés of the English Mission, which left Calcutta, in December 1874,
to explore the country lying between Bhamo and Hankow on the Yang-tse
river, were killed by the treachery of the natives, the mission itself
having been forced to return before it reached the Chinese frontier.
[391] See an interesting paper on the inundation of the Yang-tse-Kiang,
by E. L. Oxenham.—Report of the Proceedings of the Royal Geographical
Society, 1875.
[392] When, in September 1858, the question arose as to how far it
was possible to declare the River Yang-tse navigable for Europeans,
the late Admiral Sherard Osborn undertook to test it by taking Her
Majesty’s ship _Furious_, which he then commanded, accompanied by the
_Cruiser_ and two gun-boats, up the river as far as she would go.
He was the first to navigate a foreign ship of any kind to Hankow,
and the service he thus rendered was a very important one, for it
enabled Lord Elgin to insist on this great river being opened to
foreign commerce.—See address at the anniversary meeting of the Royal
Geographical Society by its President, Sir Henry C. Rawlinson, 24th of
May, 1875.
[393] The _Scotland_ sailed from Shanghai with a full cargo for Hankow
in June 1860. She drew 17 feet of water. Two light-draught trading
steamers preceded her: one an American river-boat, and the other a
Russian vessel from the Amoor.
[394] The cargo of the _Robert Lowe_ from Hankow for London consisted
of 9568 chests, 234 half chests, and 2064 boxes of black (Honor) teas;
535 bales of cotton, 192 packages of sundries. Her freight amounted to
10,315_l._, and 480_l._ passage money.
[395] It may, however, be stated that the chief emigration is from
the southern parts of China, and, rarely, north of Amoy. This, on the
whole, is a well-regulated trade, and generally carried on in British,
American, and German ships, specially chartered for the purpose; all
of which, while thus engaged, are under the Hong-Kong Passenger Act,
which has been adopted by the consuls at the different Treaty ports.
The coolie trade from the Portuguese settlement of Macao, with which
it is sometimes confounded, is of an entirely different character,
and resembles much more the old and iniquitous slave-trade than free
emigration. At Macao and in its vicinity, the coolies are collected,
often in large numbers, by coolie-brokers, who are, invariably, men
of very questionable, if not of the most depraved, character. These
scoundrels, for the most part Chinese and Portuguese, stow these poor
creatures away in well-guarded barracoons, ready for shipment; many,
perhaps, most of them, not knowing for what purpose they have been
collected. Some of them have been actually sold by their relatives
to the brokers, or decoyed away from home by false representations;
indeed, cases might be produced, where fathers have even staked their
children and themselves at gambling-tables, and, on losing their stake,
have been, summarily, transferred or exchanged for their price in coin
to these still more depraved dealers in human beings. The most usual
destination of these unfortunate creatures is Peru, where they are
employed on the Guano Islands, and from which, alas, they seldom return.
[396]
[Sidenote: Her power and capacity.]
The _Hankow_ and three other steamers of a similar class were built for
Messrs. Swire by Messrs. A. and J. Inglis of Glasgow, expressly for the
trade of the Yang-tse; their dimensions are as follows:—
-------------------------------------+-----------+--------------+-----------
|_Pekin_ and| |
|_Shanghai_.| _Ichang_. | _Hankow_.
+-----------+--------------+-----------
Gross tonnage |3076 |1781 |3168
Length on load-water line | 292 feet | 242 feet | 308 feet
Breadth, moulded | 42 feet | 36 feet | 42 feet
Depth, moulded | 15 feet | 12 ft. 6 in.| 16 feet
Load draught | 10 feet | 9 feet | 11 feet
Dead weight capacity | 664 tons | 460 tons | 840 tons
Measurement capacity in tons of 40 | | |
feet |3668 |1972 |3800
Passenger accommodation, Europeans | 14 | 10 | 14
Passenger accommodation, Chinese, 1st| 16 | 6 | 18
Passenger accommodation, Chinese, 2nd| 164 | 106 | 170
Speed on trial | 13 knots | 12 knots | 12¾ knots
Diameter of cylinder | 68 inches| 62 inches | 72 inches
Stroke | 12 feet | 10 feet | 14 feet
Indicated horse-power |1450 |1200 |1840
Pressure of steam | 27 lbs. | 33 lbs. | 35 lbs.
Consumption of fuel at full power | | |
(per hour) | 33 cwt. | 27 cwt. | 40 cwt.
-------------------------------------+-----------+--------------+-----------
The _Pekin_ was finished in May 1873; the _Shanghai_ in July 1873; the
_Ichang_, October 1873; and the _Hankow_ in April 1874.
The hulls of these vessels are of iron to the main-deck, and of the
most substantial construction, every precaution being taken to give
them sufficient strength to make the voyage to China in safety, as well
as to withstand the severe strains they are occasionally subjected to
in the river, by being left aground with a full cargo. The _Hankow_
cost, delivered at Shanghai, close upon 70,000_l._
In forwarding the particulars of these vessels, Messrs. A. and J.
Inglis remark: “Though the hulls are constructed entirely of iron, the
entire structure above the main-deck is of wood, as light as possible
consistent with the requisite strength, so as to lessen the top weight,
as we were informed that the steamers of the Yang-tse were peculiarly
liable to get aground, owing to the frequent shifting of the channel in
some parts of the river. The cargo spaces,” they add, “are in the lower
holds, and also between the main and saloon decks. The accommodation
for passengers and officers, the galleys, pantries, bath rooms, store
rooms, and other conveniences are all above the saloon deck.
“The main saloon is placed forward between the captain’s rooms and the
machinery space; above the captain’s rooms are the pilot-house and
quarter-masters’ cabins.
“The engines are after the American style, with walking beam, but are
rather more solidly constructed than is usual in America. The gallows
frame, which supports the main centre of beam, instead of being made of
wood as in the States, is of malleable iron; box framing is secured to
massive box keelsons on the floors of the ship. This style of framing,
never before adopted in beam engines, has given great satisfaction in
the six steamers to which we have fitted it.
“The _Ichang_ and _Hankow_ had common radial wheels, but in the _Pekin_
and _Shanghai_ feathering wheels were adopted, with marked advantage in
point of speed. We have no doubt that the Hankow would have attained 15
knots speed, had she been fitted with feathering wheels.
“Besides these four vessels we built a similar vessel, the _Hupeh_, for
Messrs. Russell and Company, Shanghai, in 1868, and the _Shing-King_,
a sea-going steamer with beam engine, in 1873. Messrs. Russell and
Company had previously built all their steamers in America or China,
but, becoming alive to the advantages of iron over wooden hulls, had
the above vessels and three screws built by us for their trade on the
Yang-tse and Gulf of Pechili.”
[397] _North China Herald_, 21st of January, 1875.
[398] The Chinese Government have during recent years established
various very extensive arsenals, especially at Nankin, Foochow, and
at Shanghai, where they manufacture large quantities of small arms,
and various kinds of machinery. At the two latter places, they are
now building gun-boats and war cruisers, and they contemplate, also,
constructing iron-clads at these places.
[399] Chinese junks vary in size from 120 to even 1000 tons, but, as
they stand high out of the water, their capacity seems greater; they
are usually fitted with two or three masts, and their sails are furled
or unfurled like Venetian blinds. Those built and equipped for war
are somewhat superior in strength and in speed to those employed in
commerce; but, in general, the decoration and design are similar. The
merchant vessels are provided with ports, so as to carry guns. The most
remarkable features in their hull are the abrupt and flat termination
of the bow, together with the absence of a bowsprit. A strangely
fashioned contrivance answers the purpose of a windlass. It is affixed
to the outside of the bow, by means of which the anchor is weighed. As
among the ancients, an eye is sometimes painted upon the bows of their
war junks. The lower part of the stern is either entirely hollowed out,
in an angular form, or, being flat in its primary construction, has
in its centre a recess of that description. Within this, is a second
hollow or chamber, rising the whole height, nearly from the keel to
the bottom of the quarter gallery, within which the rudder moves, and
is protected from the violence of the sea. This rudder is 5 or 6 feet
in length, and managed by ropes only, one of which is fastened to the
poop, so as, occasionally, to lift it out of the water, with a view to
its preservation.
But the Chinese have another, and much more ornamental description
of sea-going vessels called the “Soma,” with (see illustration, p.
475) usually only one mast: and, with these vessels, the Chinese sail
along the coasts of Batavia, Manilla, Annam, Cochin China, Cambogia,
Chinchiu. They are capacious for their tonnage and will hold about
a thousand chests of tea. They are high and round on each side, the
rudder is slender and can be taken out with very little difficulty.
They have no upper sails, but only one great fore-sail, besides the
sprit-sails, and the mizen, all of which are made of mats tied together
across bamboo sticks. They lower the sails with difficulty, and to
effect this are generally obliged to send a sailor up the mast to tread
the yard down.
All Chinese sea-going junks are armed with cannon—some of them heavily
for defence, and when it suits their purpose for attack, as too many of
them, though professing to be honest traders, become pirates whenever a
fitting opportunity offers. Numerous instances might be given of these
marauding attacks upon the defenceless trading vessels of all nations,
especially when a rich booty is anticipated. In such cases, their
practice is to sail to windward of their prey, sheer alongside and, if
the weather permits, throw from the mastheads “stink-pots” on board
of their victims. The atrocious smell from these pots is certain to
clear the decks and drive the crew below so that the Chinese can thus,
generally, obtain a footing on board without opposition. Except when
resistance is offered, the lives of the crew of the merchant-vessels
are generally spared; but there have been many instances when all
on board have been massacred, when the most revolting scenes have
occurred, and when the ships have been scuttled and sunk with all on
board. As a rule, however, these pirates, if they obtain what they
require, leave the plundered ship and crew to their fate.
[400] The whole of the native craft of China, above a certain size,
are usually described as junks, and the name of this particular
description is, comparatively, modern. Charnock and other writers have
puzzled themselves to know why they are called soma or sommes. Soma in
Portuguese signifies cargo or burthen, and the French have the same
meaning, _bêtes de somme_, beasts of burthen; so that soma or sommes
as now applied to these vessels, simply means vessels of large cargo
capacity, and is not, as Charnock supposes, a corruption of any Chinese
word.
[401] See Report of the Delegates of the Shanghai General Chamber of
Commerce on the trade of the Upper Yang-tse, 1869, a most interesting
and instructive document published at Shanghai.
[402] Report, p. 3.
[403] Report, p. 14.
[404] Ibid., p. 17.
[405] Ibid., p. 19.
[406] As the merchants resident in the interior of China had no
intercourse with, nor, in fact, any knowledge of, Europe till a
comparatively recent period, it may be inferred that such guilds are of
the most remote antiquity, if not of pre-historic times; and although
no mention is made of them in the early records of the Chaldeans,
Assyrians, Phœnicians, or Egyptians, it is quite probable that similar
customs prevailed among the earliest of those nations, and were
interchanged by them in their commercial intercourse with the Chinese
on the one hand, and with the Europeans on the other.
My learned friend Sir P. Colquhoun is of opinion that we got our guilds
(not corporate bodies, as they became afterwards, but associations of
men similarly employed like the present trades’ unions), which existed
in England as early as the ninth century, from the East, through the
Teutonic tribes who came from the north of Europe. He adds, that the
word “Zunft,” German for “corporation,” is also possibly derived from
the Arabic plural word “Esnáf,” a view which Mr. Redhouse supports:
other Oriental scholars, however, whom I have consulted, see no reason
for its derivation from the Arabic.
[407] These boats are usually known by the name of _sampans_, and are
generally used for the transport of commodities from the interior
to Hankow, and sometimes to the coast. But they do not serve for
commercial purposes only; they are used as dwellings for whole families
or populations, who are born, marry, and die in them. In those employed
for the conveyance of salt on the Yang-tse, the chief type of the
Chinese art of shipbuilding may be seen in all its singularity. Their
sides are mostly painted black. The upper portions of these craft are
strengthened by broad but thin beams, which are painted in various
colours, but most frequently in red, and, between these, the port-holes
are represented in the middle of a square of a similar colour. Towards
the bows the sides are raised, and form continuous cheeks, painted
green, with an eye, or some other fantastic emblem, in the centre. The
bow is quite flat; its width at the water-line, is usually from 9 to 12
feet; and, there being no stem or cutwater, the bow can only repulse
the pressure of the water, without dividing it. The poop is raised, and
open at the fore part, with a white scutcheon covered with paintings,
representing flowers, dragons, or other allegorical figures.
[408] The tea boats on the Canton river and the Yang-tse are very
numerous. They are clumsily built, and of various forms. Some have a
high stern, ornamented with paintings of the brightest colour. The
stern has usually a considerable rake, and the sides terminate with
planks distinct from the hull, resting on a cross-beam. They are
covered with varnish, and, as the heads of the nails by which they are
fastened are pointed with mastic, the line of the ribs is not apparent.
Most of them are covered in with a round water-tight roof, over which
an awning is sometimes spread. On both sides of the roofs are uprights
with rails resting on a deck, sufficiently wide and long to pass to the
stern. They have seldom more than one mast and one large sail.
[409]
[Sidenote: Their mode of rowing.]
In the best class of these vessels, the cabin projects from the ship
about 2 feet on each side, and there are folding windows round it,
which may be opened or shut as pleasure or occasion may require. In
the furthermost part are the rooms for passengers, separated from each
other by folding-screens or doors, with the floors covered with fine
mats. The outer cabin is always considered the best, and is accordingly
assigned to the most distinguished passengers. The roof, or upper
deck, is flattish, and constructed of neat boards, curiously joined
together. In rainy weather, the mast is let down upon the upper deck,
and the sail extended over it for the sailors and the people employed
in the ship’s service to take shelter under it, and to sleep at night.
Sometimes, the better to defend the upper deck, it is covered with
straw mats, which, for this purpose, are kept at hand. There is but
one sail, made of canvas, and very large; and one mast, standing up
about midships, but somewhat towards the stern. This mast, which is of
the same length as the ship, is wound up by pulleys, and again lowered
upon deck when the ship comes to anchor. The anchors are of iron. Ships
of this burden have commonly thirty to forty hands to row them, if
the wind fails. The rowers’ benches are towards the stern. They row
in unison with the air of a song, or tune with words, which serves at
the same time to direct and regulate their work, and to encourage each
other to exertion. They do not row after the European mode, extending
their oars straight forwards, with the blades just below the surface,
but they let them fall down into the water almost perpendicularly,
and then lift them up again. This way of rowing not only answers the
same purpose as our own, but is performed with less labour, and seems
to be more adapted to circumstances, considering the narrowness of
the passage through which ships sometimes pass, or when vessels pass
each other, or when the benches of the rowers are raised considerably
above the surface of the water. The oars are made in a peculiar manner,
suitable for this mode of rowing, being not all straight, like the
Europeans’ oars, but somewhat bent.
[410] In January 1861, I sold to the Prince of Satsuma one of my
auxiliary steam-ships, the _England_, which had been employed in trade
between India and China, and had made one or two voyages to Japan, soon
after the ports of that country were opened to the vessels of foreign
nations. Captain A. D. Dundas, R.N., who commanded her, and was a
part owner with me of this ship and of a sister-ship, the _Scotland_,
which afterwards became the property of the same prince, informs me he
is under the impression, that the _England_ was “the _first_ foreign
vessel purchased in Japan, except by the Government proper.” If so,
her sale may be considered the introduction of the thin edge of the
wedge which has rapidly led to a very general introduction of foreign
bottoms. As an instance of the remarkable skill and ingenuity of the
Japanese, they made new boilers of copper for this ship, within twelve
months of the time when she came into their possession (I believe they
had never before seen a boiler), but I am uncertain whether these
boilers were ever fitted into the ship. If they were, I fear the
small pieces of copper of which they were made (Japanese mechanical
knowledge not having as yet learnt the art of constructing plates of
the necessary size) would render them useless. The _England_ was seized
and scuttled by the British fleet in August 1863, at the time of the
bombardment of Kagosima, and, having been sunk in very deep water, was
never raised. The _Scotland_ was still in the service of the Japanese
in 1870.
[411] Though the above drawing represents one of the largest of the
Japanese junks, she, like all the others, had only one mast, its place
being opposite the vacant space shown at the gangway. The apparent
bulwark of trellis-work before this gangway is meant to break the sea
and allow the water to wash through. Besides, as nearly all the junks
carry deck cargoes (covered with water-tight mats where perishable)
the gratings serve the purpose of protection to the goods thus stowed,
and afford facilities for lashing and securing them in their places on
deck.
CHAPTER XIII.
Eastern Steam Navigation Company—Detailed proposals of
the directors—Capital subscribed to build the _Great
Eastern_—Relative size and speed of sailing-ships—Mr. Brunel
proposes to build a ship five or six times as big as any existing
vessel, and is supported in his views by Mr. Scott Russell—Plan
of construction, size, &c.—Mr. Atherton considers the views of
the directors are not supported by their data—The _Great Eastern_
commenced May 1, 1854—Details of her dimensions and mode of
construction—Practically, one ship within another—Compartments
and bulkheads—Floor—Construction of the iron plates for
hull—The deck and its strength—Enormous steam-power from
combination of paddle and screw—Paddle-wheel, auxiliary,
and screw-engines—Donkey-engines—Proposed accommodation
for passengers, &c.—View of deck, &c.—Saloon—Intended to
carry twenty large boats and two steamers—Compasses—Size
of sails—Magnetic apparatus of Mr. J. Gray—Apparatus for
steering—Rudder and anchors, and _note_—The ship itself a marvel
though, commercially, a failure—Preparations for, and details of,
the launching of the _Great Eastern_.
[Sidenote: Eastern Steam Navigation Company.]
In tracing the progress of steam navigation to the East the various
tenders for the conveyance of the East India and Australian mails have
been incidentally noticed. Among those which were lodged, in reply
to an advertisement from the Admiralty issued on the recommendation
of Lord Jocelyn’s Committee of 1851, there was one from a new
undertaking—the Eastern Steam Navigation Company—offering to convey
the mails from Plymouth to Sydney and to the East Indies, &c., monthly,
viâ Alexandria, in vessels of from 1300 to 2100 tons, with engines of
from 400 to 600 horse-power.[412] This company had been incorporated
by royal charter with a nominal capital of 1,200,000_l._ in 20_l._
shares, having power to increase it to 2,000,000_l._ The projectors
of the proposed undertaking were, in the highest degree, respectable,
comprising some men of great wealth, and others of well-known
scientific attainments. They were, in every way, competent to carry out
the service they had tendered to perform. The general impression, at
the time, seemed to be that they intended to act in concert with the
Austrian Lloyd’s Steam Navigation Company, a well-known undertaking
trading from Trieste to different ports in the Mediterranean and
represented in London by the late Mr. Joseph Edlmann, a merchant of the
highest standing, whose name appeared as one of the directors of the
new undertaking. But, as the ships the company intended for the service
to India and Australia were not mentioned, and more especially as the
directors did not state in their tender the sum they required for the
performance of the latter service, their offer was not accepted, though
it may have been considered.
[Sidenote: Detailed proposals of the directors.]
After the directors had communicated to the shareholders the result
of their tender, some of them, on the suggestion of Mr. I. K. Brunel,
recommended the construction of a steam-ship of extraordinary
dimensions to trade with India. On looking at the export and import
trade of Great Britain they observed that the main line of commerce
passed round the Cape of Good Hope towards India, China, and
Australia, following nearly the same track as far as Ceylon. On the
fact of this great pathway of commerce they grounded, and not without
plausible reasons, their scheme for the profitable employment of
various vessels of gigantic size between England and Ceylon, from which
place smaller vessels were to diverge to the other parts of India, as
well as to China, Japan, and Australia; the intention, however, being
to despatch their first great vessel, when ready, direct either to
Calcutta, Sydney, or Melbourne.
Having made the calculations (to their own satisfaction) that such
ships would maintain a speed of fifteen knots per hour, there was in
their judgment no doubt that they would “attract so large a portion
of the traffic as to afford full cargoes at remunerative rates
both outward and homeward.” The voyage from England would thus be
accomplished in thirty days to Trincomalee, which had been selected for
their central station, as it offered every facility for such a purpose.
Thence they estimated that the voyage in ordinary steam-vessels could
be accomplished to Madras in two days, Calcutta in four, Hong Kong in
ten, and Sydney or Melbourne in fourteen respectively; the auxiliary
steamers on these lines transferring the outward cargo from the
leviathans, and bringing to them “the valuable products of all these
countries as a back freight to England.”
“Should the great ships,” they said, “fulfil only the most moderate of
the anticipations, in regard to speed, and be able to land goods in
Calcutta within thirty-five days of their shipment in London, in Hong
Kong within forty, or in Melbourne within forty-four, it is certain
that they will take up at higher freights a large amount of goods
now conveyed in ordinary vessels. Of the whole Eastern tonnage, all
that portion which will bear a minimum freightage of 5_l._ per ton,
may be fairly calculated on as cargo available for their ships. Of
such are the silks and silk piece-goods of India and China averaging
from 2000_l._ to 3000_l._ per ton in value; indigo from 500_l._ to
1000_l._ per ton; tea, coffee, spices, lacdye, shellac, &c., of the
value of between 100_l._ to 300_l._ per ton. Among the export goods
intrinsically valuable enough to pay the higher rates of freightage
may be reckoned the principal manufactures of Birmingham, Manchester,
Sheffield, and Leeds: woollens, silks, satins, velvets, millinery,
haberdashery, oilmen’s stores, and hardware, besides the costly
productions of France and Germany.”
Going into various calculations in detail, they arrived at the
conclusion that out of the exports to India there would be 180,000
tons of goods able to afford the minimum freight, without considering
the goods at that time transported by the overland route in the ships
of the Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company, the greater
portion of which the directors of the great ship company felt certain
they would secure, while they were, further, convinced that their ships
would “attract a considerable portion of the exports to Australia
were a line of branch steamers to be laid on from Trincomalee to the
Australian ports.”
The import trade, in the opinion of the directors, was even more
valuable than the export, and could “well afford a higher freightage
in return for speedy transport.” The Aberdeen clippers they said
“obtain from 8_l._ to 12_l._ per ton for the carriage of fine teas
from China, in which trade they will be utterly unable to compete with
their great ships should they reduce the voyage from 80 to 40 days.”
Estimating at least 50,000 tons of tea from China should the freight
not exceed 6_l._ or 7_l._ per ton, and, without considering the large
and rapidly increasing amount of that article imported from Assam and
the Himalayas, the tea from China in itself would be, in the opinion
of the directors, an enormous source of profit. Then, should they
reduce the voyage from Australia to 45 or 50 days, they might calculate
with certainty on obtaining “the conveyance of all the gold from that
country.” In a word, they were of opinion that, after making the most
ample allowance for working expenses, wear and tear, depreciation and
insurance, “a surplus would remain equal to 40 per cent. per annum on
the capital invested.”[413]
[Sidenote: Capital subscribed to build the _Great Eastern_.]
Nor were the vast and increasing number of passengers overlooked in
their calculations as affording a larger source of profit than even
gold or merchandise, while, in their opinion, “for the transport of
troops the capabilities of their ships would be such as always to
command a preference from Government over vessels of smaller burden.”
Such were the views and calculations of the directors of the Eastern
Steam Navigation Company.
Nevertheless, in spite of these glowing prospects, many of the shrewd
and more cautious shareholders in the original undertaking, including
nearly all the persons interested in the Austrian Lloyd’s Company,
preferred receiving back the money they had deposited, on account of
their shares, and declined to support the new company. Others, however,
and among them many men of great capital and of high position in the
world of science, consented, and, after considerable difficulty,
sufficient capital was raised to construct the _Leviathan_, the largest
ship ever known either in ancient or modern times, and the first, as
well as the last, of the ships of this size they had contemplated
building.
[Sidenote: Relative size and speed of sailing-ships.]
About this time the important question of increased speed in
combination with increased dimensions was receiving the special
attention of scientific men, and was discussed with great animation at
the meetings of various associations. Mr. Charles Atherton, the chief
engineer of the Royal Dockyard at Woolwich,[414] had taken the lead in
forming public opinion on the novel problem of steam-ship capability.
As regards _sailing-vessels_ it had been observed that the average
length of their voyages to Australia bore the following relation to
their tonnage:
Tons.
750 to 1000 took 140 days.
1000 to 1500 took 112 days.
1500 to 2000 took 95 days.
3000 and upwards took 70 days.
[Sidenote: Mr. Brunel proposes to build a ship five or six times as
big as any existing vessel, and is supported in his views by Mr. Scott
Russell.]