CHAPTER IV

THE WALLS, GATES, AND QUAYS

On board his bark he goes straight to London, beneath the bridge; his

merchandise he there shows, his cloths of silk smoothes and opens

out.--_Roman de Tristan._

_Walls._--The walls and gates of London are frequently mentioned

incidentally by the chroniclers of the Saxon period. In the charter given

by William the Conqueror to St. Martin's le Grand, the city guarded by

them is called the Burh, and the defences themselves are called

Burhwealles. Their complete circuit can be accurately traced from existing

remnants, old plans and records. Some years ago a fragment of the east

wall of Roman date was found, which still exists a few yards east of the

south-east angle of the Keep of the Tower, at a point which must be very

near to the original junction with the south or river wall, which probably

ran in the line of the present south wall of the inner ward of the Tower.

The city wall passed north by Aldgate to the N.E. angle; then on the

north by Bishopsgate and Cripplegate to the N.W. angle, and, after making

an inset by Aldersgate, it formed another N.W. angle; thence it passed

straight south by Ludgate to the river. It was only at the end of the

thirteenth century that the south-west angle of the city was extended to

take in Blackfriars. Ample evidence of Roman workmanship has been found

for the whole extent of the north and east sides, but until recently some

have doubted whether any remains of Roman date had been found on the west;

a portion, however, was discovered between Warwick Square and Old Bailey

some twenty years ago, and in 1900 other portions were found at Newgate

Prison. Still earlier in 1843, as Roach Smith pointed out in _Collectanea

Antiqua_ (vol. i.), a portion of the city wall was found near

Apothecaries' Hall in Playhouse Yard. It was 10 feet thick, and the stones

were bedded in mortar mixed with powdered brick. In the walls of some part

of the old Blackfriars buildings found in 1900, I noticed that a

considerable quantity of the small cubical Roman stones had been re-used

in the Friary after the destruction of the south portion of the western

wall of the city. Roach Smith pointed out that the steep fall in the

ground just south of the _Times_ office and St. Andrew's Church showed

that the river wall passed along here. There is no doubt that Alfred's

London included the whole of the Roman city with the exception of the

Blackfriars extension.

[Illustration: FIG. 18.--ROMAN WALL OF LONDON.]

[Illustration: FIG. 19.--DETAIL OF ROMAN WALL OF LONDON.]

The city wall seems to have been uniformly built throughout its circuit of

small stones, 6 or 7 inches square on the face, bonded about every sixth

course with two or three courses of large flat tiles nearly 18 inches by

12 inches, and 1-1/2 inches thick. The core was rough rubble; it was

about 8 to 10 feet thick and probably 20 to 25 feet high. FitzStephen

(_c._ 1180) describes it as "the high and great wall of the city having

seven double gates and towered to the north at intervals; it was walled

and towered in like manner on the south, but the Thames has thrown down

those walls." There is evidence for a square Roman wall-tower having

existed in Houndsditch, and for others, semicircular in form. It would

always have had, as we know it had at a later time, a walk all round, a

parapet, and battlements. A part of the late wall which still shows the

walk and battlements is yet in London Wall. The turrets (of the later wall

at least) were higher than the wall.

[Illustration: FIG. 20.--FROM THE COMMON SEAL. REVERSE, ENLARGED, 1224.]

According to Stow, the ditch of the city wall was begun in 1211, and the

same writer, speaking of the Walbrook entering the city, as mentioned in

the Conqueror's charter, adds "before there was any ditch." This is a

mistake, for notices of Houndsditch appear before 1211, and the name is

used in the _Liber Trinitatis_ in a way that infers its existence before

1125. A few years ago an excavation at Aldersgate exposed a complete

section of the ditch outside the wall. It was 14 feet deep, 35 feet wide

at bottom, and 75 feet wide at the top of the sloping sides. The top of

the inner slope was 10 feet from the wall. This is drawn and described in

vol. lii. of _Archæologia_, and a comparison subsequently made with the

ditch at Silchester showed that, like it, it was certainly of Roman work.

In each there was found a raised foundation in the bed of the ditch for a

trestle bridge crossing from the gate (Fig. 21).

After the ruins of the fire (of five or six years ago) at Cripplegate were

cleared away, it was evident that the basements of the houses in the

street running north and south outside the west end of St. Giles's

churchyard, by the angle bastion of the wall which still stands there,

were built in the old ditch. A length of embanked stream which fed the

ditch ran by the east of Finsbury Circus.[75] It is shown in the so-called

Aggas plan.

[Illustration: FIG. 21.--SECTION OF ROMAN WALL AND DITCH.]

Many considerations suggest the likelihood that the first Roman walled

city was smaller in extent than it became at a later time. Roach Smith

thought that this earlier city was confined to the east side of the

Walbrook, the approach from London Bridge forming its centre. The great

wall, according to him, was "probably a work of the later days of the

Romano-British period." With this view J. R. Green agrees, and argues that

the wall was built in haste under Theodosius, when the attacks of Picts

and Saxons made walls necessary for the security of British towns.[76]

Henry of Huntingdon, writing early in the twelfth century, tells us that

"tradition says that Helen, the illustrious daughter of Britain,

surrounded London with the wall which is still standing."

* * * * *

_Gates._--Opposite the entrance to the city by the bridge was the _North

Gate_, called Bishopsgate. According to Geoffrey of Monmouth, Cæsar's

sword "Yellow Death" was buried here with a Briton who had been slain by

it. This legend is at least enough to show that the gate was ancient at

the beginning of the twelfth century. Bishopsgate is mentioned in

Domesday: "The canons of St. Paul's have _ad portam episcopi_ ten cottages

as in the time of King Edward." Outside the gate the Erming Street

stretched away to the north over the moor.

The _East Gate_--Aldgate (generally written Algate or Alegate)--is

mentioned in the foundation charters of Holy Trinity Priory in 1108. Stow

says he found it named in a charter given by King Edgar to the Cnihten

Gild, but it seems that he founded this on a later legend which professed

to recite the terms of such a charter. However, the Saxon Chronicle,

giving an account of the dispute between the Confessor and Godwine in

1052, says that some of the Earl's party _gewendon ut æt Æst geate_ and

got them to Eldulfsness (Walton-on-the-Naze). Mr. W. H. Stevenson, in an

interesting note on personal names associated with town gates, cites an

eleventh-century life of St. Edmund, in which it is called Ealsegate, and

suggests that it may be named from one Ealh; the East Gate of Gloucester

was called Ailesgate from Æthel.[77] A survey of Holy Trinity precinct

made about 1592, and now at Hatfield, gives the plan of the gate as it

then existed (possibly in part Roman), and a length of the city wall with

its semicircular bastions.[78] Outside this gate the great Roman road

reached away to Chelmsford and Colchester.

The principal _West Gate_ is clearly Newgate, as standing opposite the

East Gate and at the end of Cheap. Fabyan calls it West Gate. In the Pipe

Roll for 1188 it is called Newgate, and it was then already a prison.

Earlier in the twelfth century it seems to have been called Chamberlain's

Gate,[79] and this name is probably explained by an entry in Domesday,

where it is noted that two cottagers at Holeburn were dependent on the

sheriff of Middlesex in the time of the Confessor, and that William the

_Chamberlain_ rendered six shillings for his vineyard [there] to the

King's sheriff. That is, the Chamberlain held property outside Newgate in

1086, and the name Chamberlain's Gate probably goes back as far. An

eleventh-century text of a charter dated 889[80] describes a property,

"Ceolmundingehaga, not far from Westgetum." Possibly Coleman Street is

named after the same citizen, who may be none other than the Ealdorman of

Kent who died in 897. Outside this gate the Roman road ran west, as we

have seen, to the Tyburn, beyond which it crossed the Watling Street.

[Illustration: FIG. 22.--FROM MATTHEW PARIS, 1236.]

_Ludgate_ must have been reputed to be very ancient when Geoffrey of

Monmouth wrote, early in the twelfth century. He speaks of it as "the gate

which to this day is called in the British tongue Porth-Lud and in the

Saxon Ludesgata." On it had been "a brazen man," said to be Cadwaladr. Dr.

Rhys thinks that Geoffrey was here using ancient tradition. There is no

conclusive reason why the gate should not have preserved a British name

and a Roman statue, and at least the legend has a legend's worth. The next

earliest mention I find of it is in the St. Paul's documents, about the

middle of the twelfth century.[81] Ludgate Street without the gate is

spoken of not long after. A reference cited by Fabyan, however, probably

takes us back to the days of the Conquest (see below, p. 112). The Strand,

leading from Westminster past St. Clement Danes to Ludgate, must be an

ancient street: it may indeed represent the earliest of all paths to

London from the passage of the river by the great Watling Street. St.

Clement's Church, as we shall see, is pre-Conquest; Sir H. Ellis, in his

introduction to Domesday, says a charter by the Conqueror refers to St.

Clement Danes "in the Strand," but the actual words are not cited (vol.

ii. p. 143). A street outside the western walls--"Aldwych"--is frequently

mentioned from the twelfth century; it is represented by Wych Street and

by Drury Lane; it turned north-west from the Strand and joined the great

western highway at St. Giles, where a hospital came to be built in the

Middle Ages. Lambard says Ludgate meant, in Saxon, a postern, and this

meaning is found in the A.S. dictionaries. Mr. W. H. Stevenson has lately

again suggested that this gate is called from a Ludd or Ludda, like

Billingsgate from Billing, but on all the evidence we must conclude that

the Saxon word for postern must hold the field, especially as the opposite

gate in the east wall was called the Postern up to Stow's time.

[Illustration: FIG. 23.--THE COMMON SEAL OF LONDON, 1224.]

_Ealdredesgate_ and _Cripelegate_ are both named about the year 1000 in

Ethelred's Laws (Thorpe). The first is evidently called after one Ealdred.

As we have seen above, in p. 79, an excavation outside Aldersgate exposed

a section of the old Roman ditch, and gave evidence of a trestle bridge

which crossed it from the ancient gate, which consequently must itself

have been Roman.[82] Stow says that Cripplesgate is mentioned in a life of

St. Edmund, which tells that the Saint's body was brought through this

gate about 1010; but see Aldgate above. It is named the postern of

Cripplesgata in the Conqueror's charter to St. Martin's. In a slightly

later charter it is called Porta Contractorum (Stow).[83] These six, with

the South or Bridge Gate, make up the seven historic gates of London, and

the conclusion cannot be resisted that they all date back at least to the

time when Alfred repaired the walls of the city, and most, if not all of

them, to Roman days. Roach Smith held that the principal gates were then

Ludgate, Aldgate, and Bishopsgate. Referring to the finding of inscribed

stones near to Ludgate, he says that they doubtless belonged to a cemetery

which stood outside the gate. Hatton says that some Roman coins were found

at Aldgate on its destruction in 1606. Price says that no evidence of the

ancient wall having crossed Bishopsgate Street was found when a deep sewer

was carried along the street, and hence we may infer a Roman opening in

the wall at this point. Direct evidence has been found of Aldersgate, as

just said, and Newgate is implied by the evidence of the Roman road found

by Wren at St. Mary le Bow. FitzStephen says the city gates were double,

and a rough drawing of the city in the MS. Matthew of Paris represents

each gate as having two arches (Fig. 22). Stow also says that Aldgate was

double. The Roman gates at Chesters and other important posts on Hadrian's

Wall have coupled openings between towers containing guard chambers; the

great West Gate at Silchester was similar,[84] and we may take this gate

as a type for Roman London.

We may thus form a very clear idea of what London must have looked like

when the Norman Conqueror came and viewed the city walls from the other

side of the river, as described by Guy of Amiens.

The assertions and contradictions in recent books, and maps founded on

them,[85] are difficult to follow. According to Mr. Loftie, the north road

from Bishopsgate "joined the road to Colchester and Lincoln afterwards

called Erming Street" (Erming Street to Colchester); "We find both Watling

and the Erming Streets going off at a tangent when they have passed out"

(on plan both shown perfectly straight);[86] "Aldgate--properly

Algate--was opened about the beginning of Henry's [I.] reign"; "Aldgate

has nothing to do with 'Old' or Eald, for the simple reason that the

eastern road ran not from Aldgate but from Bishopsgate, and not to

Stratford but to Old Ford"; "Whitechapel Road--the Vicenal Way ...

answered to the street of tombs without the gate at Pompeii" (in the plan

a road going east from Bishopsgate is named Vicenal Way). It is impossible

to say what such roads were, or where they went, or how the author knew.

In the other plans mentioned above, London Bridge is shown near

Billingsgate, with the north and south street _east_ of St. Magnus and the

north gate much to the east of Bishopsgate. Watling Street is shown on a

diagonal line from Bridge end to Newgate, and Leadenhall Street and

Aldgate are omitted.

* * * * *

_Quays._--FitzStephen, as we have seen, says that London "was walled and

towered" to the south against the river. And there cannot be a doubt that

the citizens were protected in this way, when we read that they shut

themselves within their walls against the Danes, for land walls alone

would little have availed against the water-borne hordes. Stow, Wren, and

other authorities have accepted these river walls, and indeed analogy with

other water-side towns calls for them. It is evident on referring to a map

that Thames Street, Upper and Lower (above Bridge and below), must follow

the course of this wall, and that the street was outside the wall, forming

a "strand" giving access to the quays, as does the way along the Golden

Horn at Constantinople. When in 1863 Thames Street was excavated, the

Roman level appeared at 20 to 25 feet below the modern surface; the whole

was found to have been piled and cross-timbered right across the street;

this "doubtless formed the old water line and embankment fronting the

south portion of Roman London." The piling turned up the course of the

Walbrook towards Cannon Street.[87] Similar embankments were found when

the approach to new London Bridge was made, and still further east; it is

said as many as five lines were found when the present Custom House was

built. Roach Smith describes the foundations of a part of the river wall

which was found extending from Lambeth Hill to Queenhythe, and again by

Queen Street, along the north side of the street.[88] And we have seen

that the south-east and south-west angles of the wall were just on this

line. Several quay basins were formed along the river shore outside the

wall. The most famous of these was Billingsgate, which in the traditions

of Geoffrey of Monmouth took its name from Belinus, the British Apollo. In

the Laws of Ethelred (979-1015)[89] there is an item "concerning the Tolls

given at Bilingesgate." It is probably the Lundentuneshythe named in a

charter of 749[90] and the Roman Wharf of London.

[Illustration: FIG. 24.--FRAGMENT FOUND IN THE SOUTH WALL.]

The next most important quay is Queenhythe, otherwise, as Stow says,

"called Edredshithe because it at first belonged to one called Edred."

This is confirmed by the name of the Church of St. Michael "Ædredeshuda"

found about 1148 in the St. Paul's documents; about 1220 it appears as St.

Michael's de Hutha Regina in the same. The queen who gave her name to this

quay was Matilda, wife of Stephen; in the Cotton Charters (xvi. 35) is a

grant from her of the hospital by the Tower and rents from Edredshythe to

Holy Trinity Aldgate. In the Close Rolls of 21 Henry III. (1237) are two

entries in regard to the Necessary House formerly built by Matilda, late

Queen, at Queenhythe for the common use of the city; it was to be made as

long as the quay of Alan Balun, so that it might have a free course of

water. Dugdale cites a grant (_temp._ Henry II.) of a rent-charge on Ripa

Reginæ called "Aldershithe" [?] to St. Giles. In 1247 the wharf was

granted to the city at a farm of £50 a year.[91] From a charter of King

Alfred himself, dated 899, we find that the Edred who gave his name to

this wharf was none other than Ethered, Alfred's son-in-law and his

lieutenant in London (died 912).[92] In a second version of the charter

given in Birch's collection it is called Rethereshythe, but the

Peterborough Chronicle again names it correctly and gives the further

interesting fact that Harold held land near this quay: "_Comes Harold

dedit terram in London juxta monaster. S. Pauli juxta Portum qui vocatur

Etheredishithe_".[93] In a survey of the quays and approaches given in the

_Liber Custumarum_ a Retheresgate appears, and in a will of 1279

Retheresgate and the lane of St. Margaret near it are mentioned. The lane

was later Rethers Lane and then Pudding Lane. I cannot explain the

confusion as to the two sites and names. Edredshythe was walled, and the

public way leading to it is mentioned. It is of great interest that its

actual basin yet remains to us. If the city were not given over to all the

horrors of "riches," we might hope to see a statue of the great king

erected at this quay. It is of romantic interest that we can associate

with this site the names of the husband of Alfred's daughter Ethelfleda,

Lady of Mercia and of London, and Harold, last of the English.

[Illustration: FIG. 25.--FRAGMENT FOUND IN SOUTH WALL.]

_Botolph's Wharf._--According to Stow, the Conqueror confirmed to

Westminster Abbey "the gift which Almundus of the port of St. Botolph

gave ... with the house and one wharf which is at the head of London

Bridge ... as King Edward granted."

_Dowgate._--In a charter of 1150-51 which Henry II. as Duke of the Normans

gave to the citizens of Rouen, he grants that the men of Rouen who are

free of the Merchants' Gild shall be quit of all dues save for wine and

craspisce. "And the citizens of Rouen shall have at London the port of

Douuegate as they have had from the time of King Edward." After warning

other ships off the wharf, they were free to cut them adrift.[94] "Here

then we have evidence that even before the Conquest the citizens of Rouen

had a haven at the mouth of the Walbrook."[95] A chapter in the Laws of

Æthelred names the traders who were free to come to the Port of London,

and amongst these appear men of Flanders, France, and the Emperor's men.

The men of Rouen, then, as in 1150, brought wine and craspisce (dried

sturgeon or whale). From the fact that the Walbrook issued here, Dowgate

has been derived from the Celtic _Dwr_, water; this would be a very

interesting fact, if there were any certainty in it.

_Steelyard and the Vintry Wharf._--In the privileges of the Emperor's men

just mentioned we seem to have, as Dr. Sharpe suggests,[96] the beginnings

of the Gilda Teutonicorum, the great mediæval Hanse by Baynard's Castle

called at a late time the Steelyard. In the time of Henry II. the House of

the Cologne Merchants in London is mentioned, and Richard I., when passing

through Cologne, remitted the rent-charge on their Gildhall.[97] This

privilege was confirmed by John in 1213.[98]

We can probably trace the port of "the Flanders men" of Æthelred's laws in

a charter granted by the Conqueror to the Abbey of St. Peter's, Ghent, in

1081, granting Lewisham, Woolwich, etc.: and within London, the land which

King Edward [the Confessor] gave, namely, a portion of Waremanni-Acra with

the wharf belonging to it, with its market rights, stalls, shops, and

dues, and that all merchants who have landed in the Soke of St. Peter [of

Ghent in London] shall return and enjoy his protection. This charter is

witnessed amongst others by Deorman, Leofstan, and Alward _grossus_ of

London.[99] In a later confirmation of 1103-09 the ground is called

Wermanacre, and this name must be preserved in St. Martin's "de

Beremanescherche" (date 1257);[100] for Stow says St. Martin in the Vintry

was sometimes called "St. Martin de Beremund Church." Kemble gives a copy

of the original charter of the Confessor, granting to St. Peter of Ghent

the above-named places, also within London the land which _anglice_ is

called Wermanecher, with the wharf and all rights and customs. Mr. Round

shows from other documents that the Confessor visited St. Peter's, Ghent,

in 1016, and then promised to restore to the monks their possessions in

England, and that Lewisham, etc., had first been given to the monastery as

early as 918. The gift was confirmed by Edgar, with its "churches, land,

and crops," at the prayer of Dunstan, who ruled St. Peter's for some time

when exiled from England.

_Fish hythe_, in the western part of London, is named in the Saxon charter

718 of Kemble's collection. Riley, in his introduction to the _Liber

Custumarum_, which contains a valuable mediæval survey of the wharves,

puts Fish hythe near the bottom of Bread Street. _Ebbegate_, which is

mentioned in twelfth-century documents, is, Riley says, the same as Swan

Wharf.[101]

There must, even in Alfred's time, have been some sort of customs house,

for there were quay dues, and a charter of 857 speaks of the place in

London where the weighing and measuring of the port was done.[102]

We thus have a picture of a busy river front, the shore, backed by the

city walls and gates, indented with a series of docks crowded with

shipping. Says FitzStephen, "To this city from every nation under heaven

merchants delight to bring their trade by sea. The Arabian sends gold, ...

Gaul her wines." And Robert of Gloucester, characterising the fame of

several towns, says, "London for ships most." Camden likens the docks to a

floating forest.

The principal trade of the port seems to have been in slaves. A law of

_c._ 685 relates to the buying of chattels in London-wic, and the traffic

is frequently mentioned. Fifty years after the Conquest it was unsafe to

go near the ships in Bristol harbour for fear of being kidnapped, as was

young Tristram in the story. Gildas, looking back to the commerce of the

Roman period, likened the noble rivers Thames and Severn to two arms by

which foreign luxuries were of old brought in. In our period a multitude

of craft must have filled these basins and lined the river bank--dromonds

from the Mediterranean, "long ships and round ships" from the north, and

slavers from Rouen and Dublin, with many a splendid war "dragon" like Olaf

Tryggvison's--"Foreward on it was a dragon's head, but afterwards a crook

fashioned in the end as the tail of a dragon; but either side of the neck

and all the stem were overlaid with gold. That ship the King called the

Worm, because when the sail was aloft then should that be as the wings of

the dragon." The ships of Cnut's English fleet were "wondrously big; he

himself had that dragon which was so mickle that it told up sixty benches,

and on it were heads gold bedight, but the sails were banded of blue and

red and green."[103] There were also pilgrim ships, for we hear that Offa

"purchased a piece of land in Flanders in order to build a house where the

English pilgrims on landing might find refreshment."[104] According to the

legend St. Ursula and her virgins embarked at London.

Of Alfred we are told that he built ships to fight the Danish _ashes_,

"full twice as large as they, some with sixty oars, some with more." Only

last year (1900) a clinker-built boat, thought to be Danish, was found on

the Lea, 50 feet long and 9 feet beam. It must have been a wonderful sight

when the English fleet assembled at London, as in 992, or when a great

host of Northmen sailed up on the tide.

Think that below bridge the green lapping waves

Smite some few keels that bear Levantine staves,

Cut from the yew wood on the burnt-up Hill,

And pointed jars that Greek hands toiled to fill,

And treasured scanty spice from some far sea,

Florence gold-cloth, and Ypres napery,

And cloth of Bruges, and hogsheads of Guienne.

London Before the Conquest · 第 4 / 10 章