PREFACE.

As the first few pages of this little volume will sufficiently explain

its purport, the reader would not have been troubled with any prefatory

remarks, but that, since its commencement, two existing works have been

pointed out to me, the plans of which are, in one respect, similar to

mine: I allude to the Natural History of the Year, by the late Dr. Aikin

and his Son; and The Months, by Mr. Leigh Hunt.

I will not affect any obligations to these agreeable little works, (I

mean as a writer); because I feel none; and I mention them here, only to

add, that if, on perusing them, either, or both united, had seemed to

supersede what I proposed to myself in mine, I should immediately have

abandoned my intention of writing it. But the above-named works, in the

first place, relate to country matters exclusively. In the next place,

the first of them details those matters in the form of a dry calendar,

professedly made up from other calendars which previously existed, and

_not_ from actual observation; and the second merely throws gleams of

its writer's agreeable genius over such of those matters as are most

susceptible of that treatment: while both occupy no little portion of

their space by quotations, sufficiently appropriate no doubt, but from

poets whose works are in everybody's hands.

THE MIRROR OF THE MONTHS, therefore, does not interfere with the

abovenamed works, nor do they with it. It is in substance, though

certainly not in form, a Calendar of the various events and appearances

connected with a Country and a London life, during each successive Month

of the Year. And it endeavours to impress upon the memory such of its

information as seems best worth retaining, by either placing it in a

_picturesque_ point of view, or by connecting it with some association,

often purely accidental, and not seldom extravagant perhaps, but not the

less likely to answer its end, if it succeed in changing mere dry

information into amusement.

I may perhaps be allowed to add, in extenuation of the errors and

deficiencies of this little volume, that it has been written entirely

from the personal observations of one who uses no note-book but that

which Nature writes for him in the tablets of his memory; and that when

printed books have been turned to at all, it has only been with a view

to solve any doubt that he might feel, as to the exact period of any

particular event or appearance.

It is also proper to mention, that the four first Months have appeared

in a periodical work. In fact, it was the favourable reception they met

with there which induced the careful re-writing of them, and the

appearance of the whole under their present form.

Mirror of the Months · 第 7 / 30 题