There are two points in the work of Blake which first claim notice and

explanation; two points connected, but not inseparable; his mysticism and

his mythology. This latter is in fact hardly more in its relation to the

former, than the clothes to the body or the body to the soul. To make

either comprehensible, it is requisite above all things to get sight of

the man in whom they became incarnate and active as forces or as opinions.

Now, to those who regard mysticism with distaste or contempt, as

essentially in itself a vain or noxious thing--a sealed bag or bladder

that can only be full either of wind or of poison--the man, being above

all and beyond all a mystic in the most subtle yet most literal sense,

must remain obscure and contemptible. Such readers--if indeed such men

should choose or care to become readers at all--will be (for one thing)

unable to understand that one may think it worth while to follow out and

track to its root the peculiar faith or fancy of a mystic without being

ready to accept his deductions and his assertions as absolute and durable

facts. Servility of extended hand or passive brain is the last quality

that a mystic of the nobler kind will demand or desire in his auditors.

Councils and synods may put forth notes issued under their stamp, may

exact of all recipients to play the part of clerks and indorse their paper

with shut eyes: to the mystic such a way of doing spiritual business would

seem the very frenzy of fatuity; whatever else may be profitable, that (he

would say) is suicidal. And assuredly it is not to be expected that

Blake's mystical creed, when once made legible and even partially

coherent, should prove likely to win over proselytes. Nor can this be the

wish or the object of a reasonable commentator, whose desire is merely to

do art a good turn in some small way, by explaining the "faith and works"

of a great artist. It is true that whatever a good poet or a good painter

has thought worth representing by verse or design must probably be worth

considering before one deliver judgment on it. But the office of an

apostle of some new faith and the business of a commentator on some new

evangel are two sufficiently diverse things. The present critic has not

(happily) to preach the gospel as delivered by Blake; he has merely, if

possible, to make the text of that gospel a little more readable. And this

must be worth doing, if it be worth while to touch on Blake's work at all.

What is true of all poets and artists worth judging is especially true of

him; that critics who attempt to judge him piecemeal do not in effect

judge him at all, but some one quite different from him, and some one (to

any serious student) probably more inexplicable than the real man. For

what are we to make of a man whose work deserves crowning one day and

hooting the next? If the "Songs" be so good, are not those who praise them

bound to examine and try what merit may be latent in the

"Prophecies"?--bound at least to explain as best they may how the one

comes to be worth so much and the other worth nothing? On this side alone

the biography appears to us emphatically deficient; here only do we feel

how much was lost, how much impaired by the untimely death of the writer.

Those who had to complete his work have done their part admirably well;

but here they have not done enough. We are not bound to accept Blake's

mysticism; we are bound to take some account of it. A disciple must take

his master's word for proof of the thing preached. This it would be folly

to expect of a biographer; even Boswell falls short of this, having

courage on some points to branch off from the strait pathway of his

teacher and strike into a small speculative track of his own. But a

biographer must be capable of expounding the evangel (or, if such a word

could be, "dysangel") of his hero, however far he may be from thinking it

worth acceptance. And this, one must admit, the writers on Blake have upon

the whole failed of doing. Consequently their critical remarks on such

specimens of Blake's more speculative and subtle work as did find favour

in their sight have but a narrow range and a limited value. Some clue to

the main character of the artist's habit of mind we may hope already to

have put into the reader's hands--some frayed and ravelled "end of the

golden string," which with due labour he may "wind up into a ball." To

pluck out the heart of Blake's mystery is a task which every man must be

left to attempt for himself: for this prophet is certainly not "easier to

be played on than a pipe." Keeping fast in hand what clue we have, we may

nevertheless succeed in making some further way among the clouds. One

thing is too certain; if we insist on having hard ground under foot all

the way we shall not get far. The land lying before us, bright with fiery

blossom and fruit, musical with blowing branches and falling waters, is

not to be seen or travelled in save by help of such light as lies upon

dissolving dreams and dividing clouds. By moonrise, to the sound of wind

at sunset, one may tread upon the limit of this land and gather as with

muffled apprehension some soft remote sense of the singing of its birds

and flowering of its fields.

This premised, we may start with a clear conscience. Of Blake's faith we

have by this time endeavoured to give the reader some conception--if a

faint one, yet at least not a false: of the form assumed by that faith

(what we have called the mythology) we need not yet take cognizance. To

follow out in full all his artistic and illustrative work, with a view to

extract from each separate fruit of it some core of significance, would be

an endless labour: and we are bound to consider what may be feasible

rather than what, if it were feasible, might be worth doing. Therefore the

purpose of this essay is in the main to deal with the artist's personal

work in preference to what is merely illustrative and decorative. Designs,

however admirable, made to order for the text of Blair, of Hayley, or of

Young, are in comparison with the designer's original and spontaneous work

mere extraneous by-play. These also are if anything better known than

Blake's other labours. Again, the mass of his surviving designs is so

enormous and as yet (except for the inestimable _Catalogue_ in Vol. 2 of

the _Life_) so utterly chaotic and unarrangeable that in such an element

one can but work as it were by fits and plunges. Of these designs there

must always be many which not having seen we cannot judge; many too on

which artists alone are finally competent to deliver sentence by

authority. Moreover the supreme merits as well as the more noticeable

qualities merely special and personal of Blake are best seen in his mixed

work. Where both text and design are wholly his own, and the two forms or

sides of his art so coalesce or overlap as to become inextricably

interfused, we have the best chance of seeing and judging what the workman

essentially was. In such an enterprise, we must be always duly grateful

for any help or chance of help given us: and for one invaluable thing we

have at starting to give due honour and thanks to the biographer. He has,

one may rationally hope, finally beaten to powder the rickety and flaccid

old theory of Blake's madness. Any one wishing to moot that question again

will have to answer or otherwise get over the facts and inferences so

excellently set out in Chap. xxxv.: to refute them we may fairly consider

impossible. Here at least no funeral notice or obsequies will be bestowed

on the unburied carcase of that forlorn fiction. Assuming as a reasonable

ground for our present labour that Blake was superior to the run of men,

we shall spend no minute of time in trying to prove that he was not

inferior. Logic and sense alike warn us off such barren ground.

Of the editing of the present selections--a matter evidently of most

delicate and infinite labour--we have here to say this only; that as far

as one can see it could not have been done better: and indeed that it

could only have been done so well by the rarest of happy chances. Even

with the already published poems there was enough work to get through; for

even these had suffered much from the curiously reckless and helpless

neglect of form which was natural to Blake when his main work was done and

his interest in the matter prematurely wound up. Those only who have dived

after the original copies can fully appreciate or apprehend with what

tenderness of justice and subtlety of sense these tumbled folds have been

gathered up and these ragged edges smoothed off. As much power and labour

has gone to the perfect adjustment of these relics of another man's work

as a meaner man could have dreamed only of expending on his own. Nor can

any one thoroughly enter into the value and excellence of the thing here

achieved who has not in himself the impulsive instinct of form--the

exquisite desire of just and perfect work. Alike to those who seem to be

above it as to those who are evidently below, such work must remain always

inappreciable and inexplicable. To the ingeniously chaotic intellect, with

its admirable aptitude for all such feats of conjectural cleverness as are

worked out merely by strain and spasm, it will seem an offensive waste of

good work. But to all who relish work for work's sake and art for art's it

will appear, as it is, simply invaluable--the one thing worth having yet

not to be had at any price or by any means, except when it falls in your

way by divine accident. True however as all this is of the earlier and

easier part of the editor's task, it is incomparably more true of the

arrangement and selection of poems fit for publishing out of the priceless

but shapeless chaos of unmanageable MSS. The good work here done and good

help here given it is not possible to over-estimate. Every light slight

touch of mere arrangement has the mark of a great art consummate in great

things--the imprint of a sure and strong hand, in which the thing to be

done lies safe and gathers faultless form. These great things too are so

small in mere size and separate place that they can never get praised in

due detail. They are great by dint of the achievement implied and the

forbearance involved. Only a chief among lyric poets could so have praised

the songs of Blake; only a leader among imaginative painters could so have

judged his designs; only an artist himself supreme at once in lordship of

colour and mastery of metre could so have spoken of Blake's gifts and

feats in metre and colour. Reading these notes, one can rest with

sufficient pleasure on the conviction that, wherever else there may be

failure in attaining the right word of judgment or of praise, here

certainly there is none. Here there is more than (what all critics may

have) goodwill and desire to give just thanks; for here there is

authority, and the right to seem right in delivering sentence.

But these notes, good as they are and altogether valuable, are the least

part of the main work. To the beauty and nobility of style, the exquisite

strength of sifted English, the keen vision and deep clearness of

expression, which characterize as well these brief prefaces as the notes

on _Job_ and that critical summary in the final chapter of the _Life_, one

need hardly desire men's attention; that splendid power of just language

and gift of grace in detail stand out at once distinguishable from the

surrounding work, praiseworthy as that also in the main is; neither from

the matter nor the manner can any careful critic mistake the exact moment

and spot where the editor of the poems has taken up any part of the

business, laid any finger on the mechanism of the book. But this work,

easier to praise, must have been also easier to perform than the more

immediate editorial labours which were here found requisite. With care

inappreciable and invaluable fidelity has the editing throughout been

done. The selection must of necessity have been to a certain degree

straitened and limited by many minor and temporary considerations;

publishers, tasters, and such-like, must have fingered the work here and

there, snuffing at this and nibbling at that as their manner is. For the

work and workman have yet their way to make in the judicious reading

world; and so long as they have, they are more or less in the lax limp

clutch of that "dieu ganache des bourgeois" who sits nodding and

ponderously dormant in the dust of publishing offices, ready at any jog of

the elbow to snarl and start--a new Pan, feeding on the pastures of a fat

and foggy land his Arcadian herds of review or magazine:

[Greek: enti ge pikros,

kai hoi aei drimeia chola poti rhini kathetai].

Arcadian virtue and Boeotian brain, under the presidency of such a

stertorous and splenetic goat-god, given to be sleepy in broadest noonday,

are not the best crucibles for art to be tried in. Then, again, thought

had to be taken for the poems themselves; not merely how to expose them in

most acceptable form for public acceptance, but how at the same time to

give them in the main all possible fullness of fair play. This too by

dint of work and patience, still more by dint of pliable sense and taste,

has been duly accomplished. Future editions may be, and in effect will

have to be, altered and enlarged: it is as well for people to be aware

that they have not yet a final edition of Blake; that will have to be some

day completed on a due scale. But for the great mass of his lyrical verse

all there was to do has been done here, and the ground-plan taken of a

larger building to come. These preliminaries stated, we pass on to a rapid

general review of those two great divisions which may be taken as resuming

for us the ripe poetry of Blake's manhood. Two divisions, the one already

published and partially known, the other now first brought into light and

baptized with some legible name; the _Songs of Innocence and Experience_,

and the _Ideas of Good and Evil_. Under this latter head we will class for

purposes of readier reference as well the smaller MS. volume of fairly

transcribed verses as the great mass of more disorderly writing in verse

and prose to which the name above given is attached in a dim broad scrawl

of the pencil evidently meant to serve as general title, though set down

only on the reverse page of the second MS. leaf. This latter and larger

book, extending in date at least from 1789 to (August) 1811, but

presumably beyond the later date, is the great source and treasure-house

from which has been drawn out most of the fresh verse and all of the fresh

prose here given us: and is of course among the most important relics left

of Blake.

First then for the _Songs of Innocence and Experience_. These at a first

naming recall only that incomparable charm of form in which they first

came out clothed, and hence vex the souls of men with regretful

comparison. For here by hard necessity we miss the lovely and luminous

setting of designs, which makes the _Songs_ precious and pleasurable to

those who know or care for little else of the master's doing; the infinite

delight of those drawings, sweeter to see than music to hear, where herb

and stem break into grace of shape and blossom of form, and the

branch-work is full of little flames and flowers, catching as it were from

the verse enclosed the fragrant heat and delicate sound they seem to give

back; where colour lapses into light and light assumes feature in colour.

If elsewhere the artist's strange strength of thought and hand is more

visible, nowhere is there such pure sweetness and singleness of design in

his work. All the tremulous and tender splendour of spring is mixed into

the written word and coloured draught; every page has the smell of April.

Over all things given, the sleep of flocks and the growth of leaves, the

laughter in dividing lips of flowers and the music at the moulded mouth of

the flute-player, there is cast a pure fine veil of light, softer than

sleep and keener than sunshine. The sweetness of sky and leaf, of grass

and water--the bright light life of bird and child and beast--is so to

speak kept fresh by some graver sense of faithful and mysterious love,

explained and vivified by a conscience and purpose in the artist's hand

and mind. Such a fiery outbreak of spring, such an insurrection of fierce

floral life and radiant riot of childish power and pleasure, no poet or

painter ever gave before: such lustre of green leaves and flushed limbs,

kindled cloud and fervent fleece, was never wrought into speech or shape.

Nevertheless this decorative work is after all the mere husk and shell of

the _Songs_. These also, we may notice, have to some extent shared the

comparative popularity of the designs which serve as framework to them.

They have absolutely achieved the dignity of a reprint; have had a chance

before now of swimming for life; whereas most of Blake's offspring have

been thrown into Lethe bound hand and foot, without hope of ever striking

out in one fair effort. Perhaps on some accounts this preference has been

not unreasonable. What was written for children can hardly offend men; and

the obscurities and audacities of the prophet would here have been clearly

out of place. It is indeed some relief to a neophyte serving in the outer

courts of such an intricate and cloudy temple, to come upon this little

side-chapel set about with the simplest wreaths and smelling of the fields

rather than incense, where all the singing is done by clear children's

voices to the briefest and least complex tunes. Not at first without a

sense of release does the human mind get quit for a little of the clouds

of Urizen, the fires of Orc, and all the Titanic apparatus of prophecy.

And these poems are really unequalled in their kind. Such verse was never

written for children since verse-writing began. Only in a few of those

faultless fragments of childish rhyme which float without name or form

upon the memories of men shall we find such a pure clear cadence of verse,

such rapid ring and flow of lyric laughter, such sweet and direct choice

of the just word and figure, such an impeccable simplicity; nowhere but

here such a tender wisdom of holiness, such a light and perfume of

innocence. Nothing like this was ever written on that text of the lion

and the lamb; no such heaven of sinless animal life was ever conceived so

intensely and sweetly.

"And there the lion's ruddy eyes

Shall flow with tears of gold,

And pitying the tender cries,

And walking round the fold,

Saying _Wrath by His meekness

And by His health sickness

Is driven away

From our immortal day.

And now beside thee, bleating lamb,

I can lie down and sleep,

Or think on Him who bore thy name,

Graze after thee, and weep._"

The leap and fall of the verse is so perfect as to make it a fit garment

and covering for the profound tenderness of faith and soft strength of

innocent impulse embodied in it. But the whole of this hymn of _Night_ is

wholly beautiful; being perhaps one of the two poems of loftiest

loveliness among all the _Songs of Innocence_. The other is that called

_The Little Black Boy_; a poem especially exquisite for its noble

forbearance from vulgar pathos and achievement of the highest and most

poignant sweetness of speech and sense; in which the poet's mysticism is

baptized with pure water and taught to speak as from faultless lips of

children, to such effect as this.

"And we are put on earth a little space

_That we may learn to bear the beams of love_;

And these black bodies and this sunburnt face

Are like a cloud and like a shady grove."

Other poems of a very perfect beauty are those of the Piper, the Lamb, the

Chimney-sweeper, and the two-days-old baby; all, for the music in them,

more like the notes of birds caught up and given back than the modulated

measure of human verse. One cannot say, being so slight and seemingly

wrong in metrical form, how they come to be so absolutely right; but right

even in point of verses and words they assuredly are. Add fuller formal

completion of rhyme and rhythm to that song of _Infant Joy_, and you have

broken up the soft bird-like perfection of clear light sound which gives

it beauty; the little bodily melody of soulless and painless laughter.

Against all articulate authority we do however class several of the _Songs

of Experience_ higher for the great qualities of verse than anything in

the earlier division of these poems. If the _Songs of Innocence_ have the

shape and smell of leaves or buds, these have in them the light and sound

of fire or the sea. Entering among them, a fresher savour and a larger

breath strikes one upon the lips and forehead. In the first part we are

shown who they are who have or who deserve the gift of spiritual sight: in

the second, what things there are for them to see when that gift has been

given. Innocence, the quality of beasts and children, has the keenest

eyes; and such eyes alone can discern and interpret the actual mysteries

of experience. It is natural that this second part, dealing as it does

with such things as underlie the outer forms of the first part, should

rise higher and dive deeper in point of mere words. These give the

distilled perfume and extracted blood of the veins in the rose-leaf, the

sharp, liquid, intense spirit crushed out of the broken kernel in the

fruit. The last of the _Songs of Innocence_ is a prelude to these poems;

in it the poet summons to judgment the young and single-spirited, that by

right of the natural impulse of delight in them they may give sentence

against the preachers of convention and assumption; and in the first poem

of the second series he, by the same "voice of the bard," calls upon earth

herself, the mother of all these, to arise and become free: since upon her

limbs also are bound the fetters, and upon her forehead also has fallen

the shadow, of a jealous law: from which nevertheless, by faithful

following of instinct and divine liberal impulse, earth and man shall

obtain deliverance.

"Hear the voice of the bard!

Who present, past, and future sees:

Whose ears have heard

The ancient Word

That walked among the silent trees:

Calling the lapsed soul

And weeping in the evening dew;

That might control

The starry pole

And fallen fallen light renew!"

If they will hear the Word, earth and the dwellers upon earth shall be

made again as little children; shall regain the strong simplicity of eye

and hand proper to the pure and single of heart; and for them inspiration

shall do the work of innocence; let them but once abjure the doctrine by

which comes sin and the law by which comes prohibition. Therefore must the

appeal be made; that the blind may see and the deaf hear, and the unity of

body and spirit be made manifest in perfect freedom: and that to the

innocent even the liberty of "sin" may be conceded. For if the soul suffer

by the body's doing, are not both degraded? and if the body be oppressed

for the soul's sake, are not both the losers?

"O Earth, O Earth, return!

Arise from out the dewy grass!

Night is worn,

And the morn

Rises from the slumberous mass.

Turn away no more;

Why wilt thou turn away?

The starry shore,

The watery floor,

Are given thee till the break of day."

For so long, during the night of law and oppression of material form, the

divine evidences hidden under sky and sea are left her; even "till the

break of day." Will she not get quit of this spiritual bondage to the

heavy body of things, to the encumbrance of deaf clay and blind

vegetation, before the light comes that shall redeem and reveal? But the

earth, being yet in subjection to the creator of men, the jealous God who

divided nature against herself--father of woman and man, legislator of sex

and race--makes blind and bitter answer as in sleep, "her locks covered

with grey despair."

"Prisoned on this watery shore,

Starry Jealousy does keep my den;

Cold and hoar,

Weeping o'er,

I hear the father of the ancient men."

Thus, in the poet's mind, Nature and Religion are the two fetters of life,

one on the right wrist, the other on the left; an obscure material force

on this hand, and on that a mournful imperious law: the law of divine

jealousy, the government of a God who weeps over his creature and subject

with unprofitable tears, and rules by forbidding and dividing: the

"Urizen" of the prophetic books, clothed with the coldness and the grief

of remote sky and jealous cloud. Here as always, the cry is as much for

light as for license, the appeal not more against prohibition than against

obscurity.

"Can the sower sow by night,

Or the ploughman in darkness plough?"

In the _Songs of Innocence_ there is no such glory of metre or sonorous

beauty of lyrical work as here. No possible effect of verse can be finer

in a great brief way than that given in the second and last stanzas of the

first part of this poem. It recals within one's ear the long relapse of

recoiling water and wash of the refluent wave; in the third and fourth

lines sinking suppressed as with equal pulses and soft sobbing noise of

ebb, to climb again in the fifth line with a rapid clamour of ripples and

strong ensuing strain of weightier sound, lifted with the lift of the

running and ringing sea.

Here also is that most famous of Blake's lyrics, _The Tiger_; a poem

beyond praise for its fervent beauty and vigour of music. It appears by

the MS. that this was written with some pains; the cancels and various

readings bear marks of frequent rehandling. One of the latter is worth

transcription for its own excellence and also in proof of the artist's

real care for details, which his rapid instinctive way of work has induced

some to disbelieve in.

"Burnt in distant deeps or skies

The cruel fire of thine eyes?

Could heart descend or wings aspire?[16]

What the hand dare seize the fire?"

Nor has Blake left us anything of more profound and perfect value than

_The Human Abstract_; a little mythical vision of the growth of error;

through soft sophistries of pity and faith, subtle humility of abstinence

and fear, under which the pure simple nature lies corrupted and

strangled; through selfish loves which prepare a way for cruelty, and

cruelty that works by spiritual abasement and awe.

"Soon spreads the dismal shade

Of Mystery over his head;

And the caterpillar and fly

Feed on the Mystery.

And it bears the fruit of Deceit,

Ruddy and sweet to eat;

And the raven his nest has made

In the thickest shade."

Under the shadow of this tree of mystery,[17] rooted in artificial belief,

all the meaner kind of devouring things take shelter and eat of the fruit

of its branches; the sweet poison of false faith, painted on its outer

husk with the likeness of all things noble and desirable; and in the

deepest implication of barren branch and deadly leaf, the bird of death,

with priests for worshippers ("the priests of the raven of dawn," loud of

lip and hoarse of throat until the light of day have risen), finds house

and resting-place. Only in the "miscreative brain" of fallen men can such

a thing strike its tortuous root and bring forth its fatal flower; nowhere

else in all nature can the tyrants of divided matter and moral law, "Gods

of the earth and sea," find soil that will bear such fruit.

William Blake: A Critical Essay · 第 7 / 24 段