All this was not a mere matter of creed or opinion, much less of

decoration or ornament to his work. It was, as we said, his element of

life, inhaled at every breath with the common air, mixed into his veins

with their natural blood. It was an element almost painfully tangible and

actual; an absolute medium or state of existence, inevitable,

inexplicable, insuperable. To him the veil of outer things seemed always

to tremble with some breath behind it: seemed at times to be rent in

sunder with clamour and sudden lightning. All the void of earth and air

seemed to quiver with the passage of sentient wings and palpitate under

the pressure of conscious feet. Flowers and weeds, stars and stones, spoke

with articulate lips and gazed with living eyes. Hands were stretched

towards him from beyond the darkness of material nature, to tempt or to

support, to guide or to restrain. His hardest facts were the vaguest

allegories of other men. To him all symbolic things were literal, all

literal things symbolic. About his path and about his bed, around his ears

and under his eyes, an infinite play of spiritual life seethed and swarmed

or shone and sang. Spirits imprisoned in the husk and shell of earth

consoled or menaced him. Every leaf bore a growth of angels; the pulse of

every minute sounded as the falling foot of God; under the rank raiment of

weeds, in the drifting down of thistles, strange faces frowned and white

hair fluttered; tempters and allies, wraiths of the living and phantoms of

the dead, crowded and made populous the winds that blew about him, the

fields and hills over which he gazed. Even upon earth his vision was

"twofold always;" singleness of vision he scorned and feared as the sign

of mechanical intellect, of talent that walks while the soul sleeps, with

the mere activity of a blind somnambulism. It was fourfold in the

intervals of keenest inspiration and subtlest rapture; threefold in the

paradise of dreams lying between earth and heaven, lulled by lighter airs

and lit by fainter stars; a land of night and moonlight, spectral and

serene. These strange divisions of spirit and world according to some dim

and mythologic hierarchy were with Blake matters at once serious and

commonplace. The worlds of Beulah and Jerusalem, the existence of Los god

of Time and Enitharmon goddess of Space, the fallen manhood of Theotormon,

the imprisoned womanhood of Oothoon, were more to him even than

significant names; to the reader they must needs seem less. This monstrous

nomenclature, this jargon of miscreated things in chaos, rose as by nature

to his lips, flowed from them as by instinct. Time, an incarnate spirit

clothed with fire, stands before him in the sun's likeness; he is

threatened with poverty, tempted to make himself friends of this world;

and makes answer as though to a human tempter:

"My hands are laboured day and night

And rest comes never in my sight;

My wife has no indulgence given

Except what comes to her from heaven;

We eat little, we drink less;

This earth breeds not our happiness."

He beheld, he says, Time and Space as they were eternally, not as they are

seen upon earth; he saw nothing as man sees: his hopes and fears were

alien from all men's; and upon him and his the light of prosperous days

and the terrors of troubled time had no power.

"When I had my defiance given

The sun stood trembling in heaven;

The moon, that glowed remote below,

Became leprous and white as snow;

And every soul of man on the earth

Felt affliction and sorrow and sickness and dearth."

In all this we may see on one side the reflection and refraction of outer

things, on the other side the projection of his own mind, the effusion of

his individual nature, throughout the hardest and remotest alien matter.

Strangely severed from other men, he was, or he conceived himself, more

strangely interwoven with them. The light of his spiritual weapons, the

sound of his spiritual warfare, was seen, he believed, and was heard in

faint resonance and far reverberation among men who knew not what such

sights and sounds might mean. If, worsted in this "mental fight," he

should let "his sword sleep in his hand," or "refuse to do spiritual acts

because of natural fears and natural desires," the world would be the

poorer for his defection, and himself "called the base Judas who betrays

his friend." Fear of this rebuke shook and wasted him day and night; he

was rent in sunder with pangs of terror and travail. Heaven was full of

the dead, coming to witness against him with blood-shedding and with

shedding of tears:

"The sun was hot

With the bows of my mind and with arrows of thought."

In this spirit he wrought at his day's work, seeing everywhere the image

of his own mood, the presence of foes and friends. Nothing to him was

neutral; nothing without significance. The labour and strife of soul in

which he lived was a thing as earnest as any bodily warfare. Such

struggles of spirit in poets or artists have been too often made the

subject of public study; nay, too often the theme of chaotic versifiers. A

theme more utterly improper it is of course impossible to devise. It is

just that a workman should see all sides of his work, and labour with all

his might of mind and dexterity of hand to make it great and perfect; but

to use up the details of the process as crude material for cruder

verse--to invite spectators as to the opening of a temple, and show them

the unbaked bricks and untempered mortar--to expose with immodest violence

and impotent satisfaction the long revolting labours of mental

abortion--this no artist will ever attempt, no craftsman ever so perform

as to escape ridicule. It is useless for those who can carve no statue

worth the chiselling to exhibit instead six feet or nine feet of shapeless

plaster or fragmentary stucco, and bid us see what sculptors work with; no

man will accept that in lieu of the statue. Not less futile and not less

indecent is it for those who can give expression to no great poem to

disgorge masses of raw incoherent verse on the subject of verse-making: to

offer, in place of a poem ready wrought out, some chaotic and convulsive

story about the way in which a poet works, or does not work.

To Blake the whole thing was too grave for any such exposure of spiritual

nudity. In these letters he records the result of his "sore travail;" in

these verses he commemorates the manner of his work "under the direction

of messengers from heaven daily and nightly, not without trouble or care;"

but he writes in private and by pure instinct; he speaks only by the

impulse of confidence, in the ardour of faith. What he has to say is said

with the simple and abstract rapture of apostles or prophets; not with the

laborious impertinence and vain obtrusion of tortuous analysis. For such

heavy play with gossamer and straws his nature was too earnest and his

genius too exalted. This is the mood in which he looks over what work he

has done or has to do: and in his lips the strange scriptural language

used has the sincerity of pure fire. "I see the face of my Heavenly

Father; He lays His hand upon my head, and gives a blessing to all my

work. Why should I be troubled? why should my heart and flesh cry out? I

will go on in the strength of the Lord; through hell will I sing forth His

praises; that the dragons of the deep may praise Him, and that those who

dwell in darkness and in the sea-coasts may be gathered into His kingdom."

So did he esteem of art, which indeed is not a light thing; nor is it

wholly unimportant to men that they should have one capable artist more or

less among them. How it may fare with artisans (be they never so

pretentious) is a matter of sufficiently small moment. One blessing there

assuredly was upon all Blake's work; the infinite blessing of life; the

fervour of vital blood.

In spite however of all inspiration and of all support, sickness and

uncongenial company impeded his hours of labour and corroded his hours of

repose. A trial on the infamous charges of sedition and assault, brought

by a private soldier whose name of Scholfield was thus made shamefully

memorable, succeeded finally in making the country unendurable to him. It

must be said here of the hapless Hayley that he behaved well in this time

of vexation and danger: coming forward to bail "our friend Blake," and

working hard for the defence in a tumultuous and spluttering way: he

"would appear in public at the trial, living or dying," and did, with or

without leave of doctors, appear and speak up for the accused. Blake's

honourable acquittal does not make it less disgraceful that the charge

should at all have been entertained. His own courage, readiness of wit,

and sincerity of spirit are fully shown in the letter relating this short

and sharp episode in his quiet life. Some months later he returned to

London once for all, and once for all broke off relations with Felpham:

commending, it may be hoped, Hayley to the Muses and Scholfield to the

halberts.

Having read these letters, we are not lightly to judge of Blake as of

another man. Thoughts and creeds peculiar to his mind found expression in

ways and words peculiar to his lips. It was no vain or empty claim that he

put forward to especial insight and individual means of labour. If he

spoke strangely, he had great things to speak. If he acted strangely, he

had great things to do. "Mount Sinai was altogether on a smoke, because

the Lord descended on it in fire." Let the tree be judged by its fruit. If

the man who wrote thus had nothing to do or to say worth the saying or the

doing, it may fairly be said that he was mad or foolish. The involving

smoke, here again, implied the latent fire. Where the particles of dust

are mere hardened mud, where the cloud is mere condensing fog hatched from

the stagnation of a swamp, one may justly complain of the obstruction and

the obscurity. There is here indeed too much of mist, but it is at least

clear; the air that breeds it is high, the moisture that feeds it is pure.

This man had never lived in the low places of thought. In the words of a

living poet,[4] whose noble verses are worthy to stand thus near Blake's

own--

"He had seen the moon's eclipse

By the fire from Etna's lips,

With Orion had he spoken,

His fast with honey-dew had broken."

His dialect was too much the dialect of a far country; but it was from a

far country that he came, from a lofty station that he spoke. To a poet

who has given us so much, to an artist who has done great things to such

great purpose, we may give at least some allowance and some toleration.

The distance is great which divides a fireside taper from the eclipsed

moon on Etna. Rules which are useful or necessary for household versifiers

may well be permitted to relax or even to dissolve when applied to one who

has attained to see with unblinded eyes and to speak with adequate words

of matters so far above them.

The next point noticeable by us in the story of Blake's life is his

single-handed duel with Cromek and Stothard; and of this we need not wish

to speak at much length. The engraver, swift and sharp in all his

dealings--never scrupulous, insolent sometimes, and always cunning--had

an easy game to play, and played it without shame; not even taking the

trouble to hide his marked cards or to load his dice in private. In spite

or in consequence of this rapacity and mendacity,[5] Cromek was evidently

of some use to Blake. And even for the exercise of these special talents

he is perhaps not to be blamed; the man did but work with such qualities

as he had; did but put out to use his natural gifts and capacities. But

that he should have done this at Blake's expense is and must remain

unpardonable: and therefore he must be left to hang with the head

downwards from the memorial gallows to which biography has nailed him; a

warning to all such others to choose their game more warily. A tradesman

who, by their own account, swindled Blake and robbed Scott can hardly

expect to be allowed safe harbourage under the compassionate shelter of

complete oblivion or behind the weather-tight screen of simple contempt.

It may be worth while to condense the evidence as to his dealings with

Blake and Stothard. One alone of these three comes out clear from the

involved network of suspicious double-dealing. In the matter of the

engravings to Blair, Cromek had entrapped and cheated Blake from the

first. In the matter of the drawing from Chaucer, he had gone a step

further down the steep slope of peculation. After the proposal to employ

Schiavonetti, Blake might at once have thrown him over as a self-detected

knave. He did not; and was accordingly plundered again in a less dexterous

and a more direct manner. It is fortunate that the shameful little history

has at last been tracked through all its scandalous windings by so keen an

eye and so sure a hand as Mr. Gilchrist's. Two questions arise at first

sight; did Cromek give Blake a commission for his design of the

"Pilgrims"? did Stothard, when Cromek proposed that he should take up the

same subject, know that the proposal was equivalent to the suggestion of a

theft? Both these questions Blake would have answered in the affirmative;

and in his dialect the affirmative mood was distinct and strong. Further

evidence on the first head can be wanted by no one of decent insight or of

decent candour. That Cromek, with more than professional impudence, denied

the charge, is an incident in the affair neither strange nor important.

The manner of his denial may be matched for effrontery with the tone of

his insolent letter to Blake on the subject of the designs to Blair. With

the vulgarities and audacities, the shifts and the doubles of this

shuffling man of prey, no one need again be troubled. That a visitor

caught with the spoons in his pocket should bluster, stammer, and grin as

he pleads innocence or affects amazement, is natural and desirable; for

every word and gesture, humble or shameless, incoherent or intrepid,

serves to convict him twice over. Undoubtedly he saw Blake's sketch, tried

to conjure it into his pocket, and failed; undoubtedly, finding that the

artist would not again give up his work to be engraved by other hands, he

made such approach to an honest offer as was compatible with his

character; undoubtedly also he then made money in his uncleanly way out of

the failure by tossing the subject to another painter as a bait. No man

has a right to express wonder that Blake refused to hold Stothard

blameless. It is nothing whatever to the purpose that, while Cromek's

somewhat villainous share in the speculation was as yet under cover, Blake

may have bestowed on Stothard's unfinished design his friendly counsel and

his frank applause. After the dealer's perfidy had been again bared and

exposed by his own act, it was, and it is yet, a stretch of charity to

suppose that his associate was not likewise his accomplice. And the manner

of Stothard's retort upon Blake, when taxed by him with unfair dealing,

was not of a sort qualified to disperse or to allay suspicion. He charged,

and he permitted Cromek to charge, the plundered man with the act of

plunder. Even though we, who can now read the whole account without

admixture of personal feeling, may acquit Stothard of active or actual

treachery, as all must gladly do who remember how large a debt is due from

all to an artist of such exquisite and pleasurable talent, it is hopeless

to make out for him a thoroughly sufficient case. The fellowship of such

an one as Cromek leaves upon all who take his part at least the suspicion

of a stain. All should hope that Stothard on coming out of the matter

could have shown clean hands; none can doubt that Blake did. That on

Stothard's part irritation should have succeeded to surprise, and rancour

to irritation, is not wonderful. If he was indeed injured by the fault of

Cromek and the misfortune of Blake, it would doubtless have been admirably

generous to have controlled the irritation and overcome the rancour; but

in that case the worst that should be said of him is that he did not adopt

the noblest course of action possible to him. Admitting this, he is not

blameable for choosing to throw in his lot with Cromek; but we must then

suppose not merely that Cromek had abstained from any avowal of his

original treachery, but that Stothard was unhappily able to accept in good

faith the bare assertion of Cromek in preference to the bare assertion of

Blake. If we believe this, we are bound to admit no harsher feeling than

regret that Cromek should so have duped and blinded his betters; but in

common fairness we are also bound to restrict the question within these

limits. For Stothard a door of honourable escape stands open; and all must

desire rather to widen than to narrow the opening. No one can wish to

straiten his chance of acquittal, or to inquire too curiously whether

there be not a pretext for closing the door that now stands ajar. But for

the rest, it is simply necessary to choose between Blake's authority and

Cromek's; and to consider this alternative seriously for a moment would be

at once an act of condescension towards Cromek and of impertinence towards

Blake, equally unjustifiable on either side. It is possible that Blake was

not wronged by Stothard; it is undeniable that he was wronged through him.

It is probable that Stothard believed himself to be not in the wrong; it

is certain that Blake was in the right.[6]

About the close of this quarrel, and before the publication of Blake's

designs to Blair as engraved for Cromek by Schiavonetti, a book came out

which would have deserved more notice and repaid more interest than has

yet been shown it. The graceful design by Blake on its frontispiece is not

the only or even the chief attraction of Dr. Malkin's "Memoirs of his

Child." The writer indeed treads ponderously and speaks thickly; but there

is extant no picture at once so perfect and so quaint of a purely

childlike talent. Even supreme genius, which usually has a mind now and

then to try, has never given us the complete and vivid likeness which a

child has for once given of himself. Even Shakespeare, even Hugo, even

Blake, has not done this. The husky dialect of his father suffices to

express something; and the portrait is significant and pleasant,

reproducing as it does the solid grace and glad gravity proper to

children; a round and bright figure, with no look of over-training or

disease. But the child's own scraps and scrawls contain the kernel and

jewel of the book. His small drawings are certainly firmer, clearer, more

inventive than could have been looked for in a six-year-old artist. Any

slight imitative work in a child implies the energy which impels invention

in a man. His little histories and geographies are delightful for

illogical sequence of events and absurd coherence of fancy. Only a child

could have invented and combined such unimaginable eccentricities of

innocence. The language and system of proper names strongly recall

Blake's own habits of speech. The province of Malleb and the city of

Tumblebob are no unfit abodes for Hand and Hyle, Kwantok and Kotope. The

moral polity of Allestone is not unlike that which prevails among the

Emanations "who in the aggregate are called Jerusalem." The pamphlet,

condensed and compressed into a form more thoroughly readable, would be

worth republishing.

It seems probable that the verses following were written by Blake about

this time, as Mr. Gilchrist refers the design of the "Last Judgment,"

executed on commission for Lady Egremont, to the year 1807. They are

evidently meant to match the beautiful dedication of the designs to Blair,

which were not brought out till the next year. Less excellent in

workmanship, they are not less important by way of illustration. The

existence of some mythical or symbolic island of Atalantis, where the arts

were to be preserved as in paradise, now walled round or washed over by

the blind and bitter waters of time, was a favourite vision with Blake. At

a first reading some of these verses seemed to refer to the subsequent

series of designs from Dante; but there is no evidence of any such later

commission as we must in that case take for granted.

"The caverns of the grave I've seen,

And these I showed to England's queen;

But now the caves of Hell I view,

Who shall I dare to show them to?

What mighty soul in beauty's form

Shall dauntless view the infernal storm?

Egremont's Countess can control

The flames of hell that round me roll.

If she refuse, I still go on,

Till the heavens and earth are gone;

Still admired by noble minds,

Followed by Envy on the winds.

Re-engraved time after time,

Ever in their youthful prime,

My designs unchanged remain;

Time may rage, but rage in vain;

For above Time's troubled fountains,

On the great Atlantic mountains,

In my golden house on high,

There they shine eternally."

Blake was always looking westward for his islands of the blest. All

transatlantic things appear to have a singular hold upon his fancy.

America was a land of misty and stormy morning, struck by the fierce and

fugitive fires of intermittent war and nascent freedom. In a dim confused

manner, he seems to mix up the actual events of history with the formless

and labouring legends of his own mythology; or rather to cast

circumstances into the crucible of vision, and extract a strange amalgam

of metals unfit for mortal currency and difficult to bring to any test.

In 1808 the illustrations to "Blair's Grave" appeared, and found some

acceptance; a success on which the shameful soul of Cromek fed exultingly

and fattened scandalously. The ravenous gamester had packed his cards from

the first with all due care, and was able now to bluster without fear as

he had before swindled without shame. Twenty pounds of the profits fell to

the share of the designer for some of the most admirable works extant in

that line. The sweetness and vivid grace of these designs are as

noticeable as the energy and rapidity of imagination implied by them. Even

in Blake's lifetime their tender and lofty beauty drew down some

recognition; and incautious criticism, as it praised them, forgot that the

artist was not dead yet. The generous oversight was afterwards amply and

consistently redeemed. For the moment it was perhaps not wonderful that

even so much excellence should obtain something of mistrustful admiration.

The noble passion and exaltation of spirit here made visible burnt its way

into notice for a time; and Cromek was allowed to claim applause for his

invention of Blake. We will choose two designs only for reference. None

who have seen can well forget the glorious violence of reunion between

soul and body, meeting with fierce embraces, with glad agony and rage of

delight; with breasts yearning and eyes wide, with sweet madness of

laughter at their lips; the startled and half-arisen body not less divine

already than the descending soul, though the earth clings yet about his

knees and feet, and though she comes down as with a clamour of rushing

wind and prone impulse of falling water, fresh from the stars and the

highest air of heaven. But for perfect beauty nothing of Blake's can be

matched against the design of the soul departing; in this drawing the body

lies filled as it were and clothed with the supreme sleep of flesh, no man

watching by it; with limbs laid out and covered, with eyelids close; and

the soul, with tender poise of pausing feet, with painless face and sad

pure eyes, looks back as with a serene salutation full of pity, before

passing away into the clear air and light left at the end of sunset on

heaven and the hills; where outside the opened lattice a soft cold land of

rising fields and ridged moorland bears upon it the barren beauty of

shadow and sleep, the breath and not the breeze of evening. The sweet and

grave grace of this background, with a bright pallor in the sky and an

effect upon field and moor of open air without wind, brings with it a

sense as of music.

A year later Blake advertised and opened his exhibition; which he was

about as qualified to manage as little Malkin might have been. Between

anger, innocence, want of funds and sense of merit, he would assuredly

have ruined a better chance than he ever had. With the exception of his

_Canterbury Pilgrims_, the choice of pictures and designs for exhibition

seems to have been somewhat unhappy.[7] The admirable power and high

dramatic quality of that singular but noble picture, the latent or

superincumbent beauty which corrects and redeems its partial ugliness, the

strong imagination and the fanciful justice of the entire work, were

invisible to all but such spectators as Charles Lamb; if indeed there were

ever another capable of seeing them to such purpose. Whatever portion of

the like merit there may have been in the other works exhibited was still

more utterly lost upon the few who saw them at all; for of these we have

scarcely any record beyond Blake's own. One journal alone appears to have

noticed the exhibition. An angry allusion of Blake's to some assault of

the _Examiner_ newspaper upon his works and character has been hitherto

left unexplained, presumably through a not irrational contempt. That Blake

may be cleared from any charge of perversity, a brief account of the

quarrel is here appended. Contemptible as are both the journeyman writer

and his poor day's work, they have been found worth tracking down on

account of the game flown at.

William Blake: A Critical Essay · 第 3 / 24 段