CHAPTER XXI

THE CHURCH LIFE AND GROWTH

THROUGHOUT Mr. Muller's journal we meet scattered and fragmentary

suggestions as to the true conception of Christian teaching and

practice, the nature and office of the Christian ministry, the

principles which should prevail in church conduct, the mutual relations

of believers, and the Spirit's relation to the Body of Christ, to pure

worship, service, and testimony. These hints will be of more value if

they are crystallized into unity so as to be seen in their connection

with each other.

The founder of the orphan houses began and ended his public career as a

preacher, and, for over sixty years, was so closely related to one body

of believers that no review of his life can be complete without a

somewhat extended reference to the church in Bristol of which he was one

of the earliest leaders, and, of all who ministered to it, the longest

in service.

His church-work in Bristol began with his advent to that city and ended

only with his departure from it for the continuing city and the Father's

House. The joint ministry of himself and Mr. Henry Craik has been traced

already in the due order of events; but the development of church-life,

under this apostolic ministry, furnishes instructive lessons which yield

their full teaching only when gathered up and grouped together so as to

secure unity, continuity, and completeness of impression.

When Mr. Muller and Mr. Craik began joint work in Bristol, foundations

needed to be relaid. The church-life, as they found it, was not on a

sufficiently scriptural basis, and they waited on God for wisdom to

adjust it more completely to His word and will. This was the work of

time, for it required the instruction of fellow believers so that they

might be prepared to cooperate, by recognizing scriptural and spiritual

teaching; it required also the creation of that bond of sympathy which

inclines the flock to hear and heed the shepherd's voice, and follow a

true pastoral leadership. At the outset of their ministry, these

brethren carefully laid down some principles on which their ministry was

to be based. On May 23, 1832, they frankly stated, at Gideon Chapel,

certain terms on which alone they could take charge of the church: they

must be regarded as simply God's servants to labour among them so long

as, and in such way as might be His will, and under no bondage of fixed

rules; they desired pew-rents to be done away with, and voluntary

offerings substituted, etc.

There was already, however, a strong conviction that a new start was in

some respects indispensable if the existing church-life was to be

thoroughly modelled on a scriptural pattern. These brethren determined

to stamp upon the church certain important features such as these:

Apostolic simplicity of worship, evangelical teaching, evangelistic

work, separation from the world, systematic giving, and dependence on

prayer. They desired to give great prominence to the simple testimony of

the Word, to support every department of the work by free-will

offerings, to recognize the Holy Spirit as the one presiding and

governing Power in all church assemblies, and to secure liberty for all

believers in the exercise of spiritual gifts as distributed by that

Spirit to all members of the Body of Christ for service. They believed

it scriptural to break bread every Lord's day, and to baptize by

immersion; and, although this latter has not for many years been a term

of communion or of fellowship, believers have always been carefully

taught that this is the duty of all disciples.

It has been already seen that in August, 1832, seven persons in all,

including these two pastors, met at Bethesda Chapel to unite in

fellowship, without any formal basis or bond except that of loyalty to

the Word and Spirit of God. This step was taken in order to start anew,

without the hindrance of customs already prevailing, which were felt to

be unscriptural and yet were difficult to abolish without discordant

feeling; and, from that date on, Bethesda Chapel has been the home of an

assembly of believers who have sought steadfastly to hold fast the New

Testament basis of church-life.

Such blessed results are largely due to these beloved colleagues in

labour who never withheld their testimony, but were intrepidly

courageous and conscientiously faithful in witnessing against whatever

they deemed opposed to the Word. Love ruled, but was not confounded with

laxity in matters of right and wrong; and, as they saw more clearly what

was taught in the Word, they sought to be wholly obedient to the Lord's

teaching and leading, and to mould and model every matter, however

minute, in every department of duty, private or public, according to the

expressed will of God.

In January, 1834, all teachers who were not believers were dismissed

from the Sunday-school; and, in the Dorcas Society, only believing

sisters were accepted to make clothes for the destitute. The reason was

that it had been found unwise and unwholesome to mix up or yoke together

believers and unbelievers.* Such association proved a barrier to

spiritual converse and injurious to both classes, fostering in the

unbelievers a false security, ensnaring them in a delusive hope that to

help in Christian work might somehow atone for rejection of Jesus Christ

as a Saviour, or secure favour from God and an open door into heaven. No

doubt all this indiscriminate association of children of God with

children of the world in a "mixed multitude" is unscriptural.

Unregenerate persons are tempted to think there is some merit at least

in mingling with worshippers and workers, and especially in giving to

the support of the gospel and its institutions. The devil seeks to

persuade such that it is acceptable to God to conform externally to

religious rites, and forms, and take part in outward acts of service and

sacrifice, and that He will deal leniently with them, despite their

unbelief and disobedience. Mr. Muller and Mr. Craik felt keenly that

this danger existed and that even in minor matters there must be a line

of separation, for the sake of all involved.

* 2 Cor. vi. 14-18.

When, in 1837, in connection with the congregation at Bethesda, the

question was raised--commonly known as that of close communion--whether

believers who had not been baptized as such should be received into

fellowship, it was submitted likewise to the one test of clear scripture

teaching. Some believers were conscientiously opposed to such reception,

but the matter was finally and harmoniously settled by "receiving all

who love our Lord Jesus into full communion, irrespective of baptism,"

and Mr. Muller, looking back forty-four years later upon this action,

bears witness that the decision never became a source of dissension.*

* Appendix L.

In all other church matters, prayer and searching the Word, asking

counsel of the Holy Oracles and wisdom from above, were the one resort,

and the resolution of all difficulties. When, in the spring of 1838,

sundry questions arose somewhat delicate and difficult to adjust, Mr.

Muller and Mr. Craik quietly withdrew from Bristol for two weeks, to

give themselves to prayer and meditation, seeking of God definite

direction.

The matters then at issue concerned the scriptural conception, mode of

selection and appointment, scope of authority and responsibility, of

_the Eldership;_ the proper mode of observance of the _Lord's Supper,_

its frequency, proper subjects, etc. Nothing is ever settled finally

until settled rightly, nor settled rightly until settled scripturally. A

serious peril confronted the church--not of controversy only, but of

separation and schism; and in such circumstances mere discussion often

only fans the embers of strife and ends in hopeless alienation. These

spiritually minded pastors followed the apostolic method, referring all

matters to the Scriptures as the one rule of faith and practice, and to

the Holy Spirit as the presiding Presence in the church of God; and they

purposely retired into seclusion from the strife of tongues and of

conflicting human opinion, that they might know the mind of the Lord and

act accordingly. The results, as might be foreseen, were clear light

from above for themselves, and a united judgment among the brethren; but

more than this, God gave them wisdom so to act, combining the courage of

conviction with the meekness and gentleness of Christ, as that all

clouds were dispelled and peace restored.*

* Appendix M.

For about eight years, services had been held in both Gideon and

Bethesda chapels; but on April 19, 1840, the last of the services

conducted by Mr. Muller and Mr. Craik was held at Gideon,--Bethesda,

from this time on, becoming the central place of assembly. The reasons

for this step were somewhat as follows:

These joint pastors strongly felt, with some others, that not a few of

the believers who assembled at Gideon Chapel were a hindrance to the

clear, positive, and united testimony which should be given both to the

church and world; and it was on this account that, after many meetings

for prayer and conference, seeking to know God's mind, it was determined

to relinquish Gideon as a place of worship. The questions involved

affected the preservation of the purity and simplicity of apostolic

worship, and so the conformity of church-life to the New Testament

pattern. These well-yoked pastors were very jealous for the Lord God of

hosts, that, among the saints to whom they ministered, nothing should

find a lodgment which was not in entire accord with scriptural

principles, precepts, and practices.

Perhaps it is well here to put on record, even at risk of repetition,

the principles which Mr. Muller and his colleague were wont to enforce

as guards or landmarks which should be set up and kept up, in order to

exclude those innovations which always bring spiritual declension.

1. Believers should meet, simply as such, without reference to

denominational lines, names, or distinctions, as a corrective and

preventive of sectarianism.

2. They should steadfastly maintain the Holy Scriptures as the divine

rule and standard of doctrine, deportment, and discipline.

3. They should encourage freedom for the exercise of whatever spiritual

gifts the Lord might be pleased by His Spirit to bestow for general

edification.

4. Assemblies on the Lord's day should be primarily for believers, for

the breaking of bread, and for worship; unbelievers sitting

promiscuously among saints would either hinder the appearance of meeting

for such purposes, or compel a pause between other parts of the service

and the Lord's Supper.

5. The pew-rent system should be abolished, as promoting the caste

spirit, or at least the outward appearance of a false distinction

between the poorer and richer classes, especially as pew-holders

commonly look on their sittings as private property.

6. All money contributed for pastoral support, church work, and

missionary enterprises at home and abroad should be by free-will

offerings.

It was because some of these and other like scriptural principles were

thought to be endangered or compromised by practices prevailing at

Gideon Chapel before Mr. Muller and Mr. Craik took charge, that it

seemed best on the whole to relinquish that chapel as a place of

worship. As certain customs there obtaining had existed previously, it

seemed to these godly-minded brethren that it would be likely to cause

needless offence and become a root of bitterness should they require

what they deemed unscriptural to be renounced; and it seemed the way of

love to give up Gideon Chapel after these eight years of labour there,

and to invite such as felt called on to separate from every sectarian

system, and meet for worship where free exercise would be afforded for

every spiritual gift, and where New Testament methods might be more

fully followed, to assemble with other believers at Bethesda, where

previous hindering conditions had not existed.

Mr. Muller remained very intimately connected with Bethesda and its

various outgrowths, for many years, as the senior pastor, or

elder,--though only _primus inter pares,_ i.e., leader among equals. His

opinions about the work of the ministry and the conduct of church-life,

which did so much to shape the history of these churches, therefore form

a necessary part of this sketch of the development of church-life.

It was laid upon his heart frequently to address his brethren in the

ministry of the Word and the curacy of souls. Everywhere, throughout the

world, he welcomed opportunities for interviews, whether with many or

few, upon whom he could impress his own deep convictions as to the vital

secrets of effective service in the pulpit and pastorate. Such meetings

with brethren in the ministry numbered hundreds and perhaps thousands in

the course of his long life, and as his testimony was essentially the

same on all occasions, a single utterance may be taken as the type of

all. During his American tours, he gave an hour's address which was

reported and published, and the substance of which may therefore be

given.

First of all he laid great stress upon the _need of conversion._ Until a

man is both truly turned unto God and sure of this change in himself he

is not fitted to convert others. The ministry is not a human profession,

but a divine vocation. The true preacher is both a _herald_ and a

_witness,_ and hence must back up his message by his personal testimony

from experience.

But even conversion is not enough: there must be an _intimate knowledge

of the Lord Jesus._ One must know the Lord as coming near to himself,

and know the joy and strength found in hourly access. However it be

done, and at any cost, the minister of Christ must reach this close

relationship. It is an absolute necessity to peace and power.

_Growth in happiness and love_ was next made very prominent. It is

impossible to set limits to the experience of any believer who casts

himself wholly on God, surrenders himself wholly to God, and cherishes

deep love for His word and holy intimacy with Himself. The first

business of every morning should be to secure happiness in God.

He who is to nourish others must carefully _feed his own soul._ Daily

reading and study of the Scriptures, with much prayer, especially in the

early morning hours, was strenuously urged. Quietness before God should

be habitually cultivated, calming the mind and freeing it from

preoccupation. Continuous reading of the Word, in course, will throw

light upon the general teaching of the Word, and reveal God's thoughts

in their variety and connection, and go far to correct erroneous views.

_Holiness_ must be the supreme aim: prompt obedience to all known truth,

a single eye in serving God, and zeal for His glory. Many a life has

been more or less a failure because habits of heart well pleasing to God

have been neglected. Nothing is more the crowning grace than the

unconscious grace of _humility._ All praise of man robs God of His own

honour. Let us therefore be humble and turn all eyes unto God.

The _message_ must be gotten from God, if it is to be with power. "Ask

God for it," said Mr. Muller, "and be not satisfied until the heart is

at rest. When the text is obtained ask further guidance in meditating

upon it, and keep in constant communion so as to get God's mind in the

matter and His help in delivery. Then, after the work is done, pray much

for blessing, as well as in advance." He then told some startling facts

as to seed sown many years before, but even now yielding fruit in answer

to prayer.

He laid also special emphasis upon _expounding the Scripture._ The word

of God is the staple of all preaching; Christ and nothing else the

centre of all true ministry of the Word. Whoever faithfully and

constantly preaches Christ will find God's word not returning to him

void. Preach simply. Luther's rule was to speak so that an ignorant

maid-servant could understand; if she does, the learned professor

certainly will; but it does not hold true that the simple understand all

that the wise do.

Mr. Muller seldom addressed his brethren in the ministry without giving

more or less counsel as to the conduct of church-life, giving plain

witness against such hindrances as unconverted singers and choirs,

secular methods of raising money, pew-rents and caste distinctions in

the house of prayer, etc.; and urging such helps as inquirers' meetings,

pastoral visits, and, above all else, believing prayer. He urged

definite praying and importunate praying, and remarked that Satan will

not mind how we labour in prayer for a few days, weeks, or even months,

if he can at last discourage us so that we cease praying, as though it

were of no use.

As to prayers for past seed-sowing, he told the writer of this memoir

how in all supplication to God he looked not only forward but

_backward._ He was wont to ask that the Lord would be pleased to bless

seed long since sown and yet apparently unfruitful; and he said that, in

answer to these prayers, he had up to that day evidence of God's loving

remembrance of his work of faith and labour of love in years long gone

by. He was permitted to know that messages delivered for God, tracts

scattered, and other means of service had, after five, ten, twenty, and

even sixty years, at last brought forth a harvest. Hence his urgency in

advising fellow labourers to pray unceasingly that God would work

mightily in the hearts of those who had once been under their care,

bringing to their remembrance the truth which had been set before them.

The humility Mr. Muller enjoined he practised. He was ever only the

_servant_ of the Lord. Mr. Spurgeon, in one of his sermons, describes

the startling effect on London Bridge when he saw one lamp after another

lit up with flame, though in the darkness he could not see the

lamplighter; and George Muller set many a light burning when he was

himself content to be unseen, unnoticed, and unknown. He honestly sought

not his own glory, but had the meek and quiet spirit so becoming a

minister of Jesus Christ.

Mr. Henry Craik's death in 1866, after thirty-four years of co-labour in

the Lord, left Mr. Muller comparatively alone with a double burden of

responsibility, but his faith was equal to the crisis and his peace

remained unbroken. A beloved brother, then visiting Bristol, after

crowded services conducted by him at Bethesda, was about leaving the

city; and he asked Mr. Muller, "What are you going to do, now that Mr.

Craik is dead, to hold the people and prevent their scattering?" "My

beloved brother," was the calm reply, "we shall do what we have always

done, _look only to the Lord."_

This God has been the perpetual helper. Mr. Muller almost totally

withdrew from the work, during the seventeen years of his missionary

tours, between 1875 and 1892, when he was in Bristol but a few weeks or

months at a time, in the intervals between his long journeys and

voyages. This left the assembly of believers still more dependent upon

the great Shepherd and Bishop of souls. But Bethesda has never, in a

sense, been limited to any one or two men, as the only acknowledged

leaders; from the time when those seven believers gathered about the

Lord's table in 1832, the New Testament conception of the equality of

believers in privilege and duty has been maintained. The one supreme

Leader is the Holy Ghost, and under Him those whom He calls and

qualifies. One of the fundamental principles espoused by these brethren

is that the Spirit of God controls in the assemblies of the saints; that

He sets the members, every one of them, in the Body as it pleaseth Him,

and divides unto them, severally as He will, gifts for service in the

Body; that the only true ordination is His ordination, and that the

manifestation of His gifts is the sufficient basis for the recognition

of brethren as qualified for the exercise of an office or function, the

possession of spiritual gifts being sufficient authority for their

exercise. It is with the Body of Christ as with the human body: the eye

is manifestly made for seeing and the ear for hearing, the hand and foot

for handling and walking; and this adaptation both shows the design of

God and their place in the organism. And so for more than threescore

years the Holy Spirit has been safely trusted to supply and qualify all

needed teachers, helpers, and leaders in the assembly. There has always

been a considerable number of brethren and sisters fitted and disposed

to take up the various departments of service to which they were

obviously called of the Spirit, so that no one person has been

indispensable. Various brethren have been able to give more or less time

and strength to preaching, visiting, and ruling in the church; while

scores of others, who, like Paul, Priscilla and Aquila, the tent-makers,

have their various business callings and seek therein to "abide with

God," are ready to aid as the Lord may guide in such other forms of

service as may consist with their ordinary vocations. The prosperity of

the congregation, its growth, conduct, and edification, have therefore

been dependent only on God, who, as He has withdrawn one worker after

another, has supplied others in their stead, and so continues to do.

To have any adequate conception of the fruits of such teaching and such

living in church-life, it is needful to go at least into one of the

Monday-night prayer meetings at Bethesda. It is primitive and apostolic

in simplicity. No one presides but the unseen Spirit of God. A hymn is

suggested by some brother, and then requests for prayer are read,

usually with definite mention of the names of those by and for whom

supplication is asked. Then prayer, scripture reading, singing, and

exhortation follow, without any prearrangement as to subject, order in

which or persons by whom, the exercises are participated in. The fullest

liberty is encouraged to act under the Spirit's guidance; and the fact

of such guidance is often strikingly apparent in the singular unity of

prayer and song, scripture reading and remarks, as well as in the

harmonious fellowship apparent. After more than half a century these

Monday-night prayer services are still a hallowed centre of attraction,

a rallying-point for supplication, and a radiating-point for service,

and remain unchanged in the method of their conduct.

The original congregation has proved a tree whose seed is in itself

after its kind. At the time of Mr. Muller's decease it was nearly

sixty-six years since that memorable evening in 1832 when those seven

believers met to form a church; and the original body of disciples

meeting in Bethesda had increased to ten, six of which are now

independent of the mother church, and four of which still remain in

close affiliation and really constitute one church, though meeting in

Bethesda, Alma Road, Stokes Croft, and Totterdown chapels. The names of

the other churches which have been in a sense offshoots from Bethesda

are as follows: Unity, Bishopston, Cumberland Hall, Charleton Hall,

Nicholas Road, and Bedminster.

At the date of Mr. Muller's decease the total membership of the four

affiliated congregations was upwards of twelve hundred.

In this brief compass no complete outline could be given of the church

life and work so dear to him, and over which he so long watched and

prayed. This church has been and is a missionary church. When on March

1, 1836, Mr. and Mrs. Groves, with ten helpers, left Bristol to carry on

mission work in the East Indies, Mr. Muller felt deeply moved to pray

that the body of disciples to whom he ministered might send out from

their own members labourers for the wide world-field. That prayer was

not forgotten before God, and has already been answered exceeding

abundantly above all he then asked or thought. Since that time some

sixty have gone forth to lands afar to labour in the gospel, and at the

period of Mr. Muller's death there were at work, in various parts of the

world, at least twenty, who are aided by the free-will offerings of

their Bristol brethren.

When, in 1874, Mr. Muller closed the third volume of his Narrative, he

recorded the interesting fact that, of the many nonconformist ministers

of the gospel resident in Bristol when he took up work there more than

forty-two years before, _not one remained,_ all having been removed

elsewhere or having died; and that, of all the Evangelical clergy of the

establishment, only _one_ survived. Yet he himself, with very rare

hindrance through illness, was permitted to preach and labour with

health and vigour both of mind and body; over a thousand believers were

already under his pastoral oversight, meeting in three different

chapels, and over three thousand had been admitted into fellowship.

It was the writer's privilege to hear Mr. Muller preach on the morning

of March 22, 1896, in Bethesda Chapel. He was in his ninety-first year,

but there was a freshness, vigour, and terseness in his preaching that

gave no indication of failing powers; in fact, he had never seemed more

fitted to express and impress the thoughts of God.

His theme was the seventy-seventh psalm, and it afforded him abundant

scope for his favourite subject--prayer. He expounded the psalm verse by

verse, clearly, sympathetically, effectively, and the outline of his

treatment strongly engraved itself on my memory and is here reproduced.

"I cried unto God with my voice." Prayer seeks a voice--to utter itself

in words: the effort to clothe our desires in language gives

definiteness to our desires and keeps the attention on the objects of

prayer.

"In the day of my trouble." The Psalmist was in trouble; some distress

was upon him, perhaps physical as well as mental, and it was an

unceasing burden night and day.

"My soul refused to be comforted." The words, "my sore ran in the

night," may be rendered, "my hand reached out"--that is in prayer. But

unbelief triumphed, and his soul refused all comfort--even the comfort

of God's promises. His trouble overshadowed his faith and shut out the

vision of God.

"I remembered, or thought of God, and was troubled." Even the thought of

God, instead of bringing peace, brought distress; instead of silencing

his complaint, it increased it, and his spirit was overwhelmed--the sure

sign, again, of unbelief. If in trouble God's promises and the thought

of God bring no relief, they will only become an additional burden.

"Thou holdest mine eyes waking." There was no sleep because there was no

rest or peace. Care makes wakeful. Anxiety is the foe of repose. His

spirit was unbelieving and therefore rebellious. He would not take God

at His word.

"I have considered the days of old." Memory now is at work. He calls to

remembrance former experiences of trouble and of deliverance. He had

often sought God and been heard and helped, and why not now? As he made

diligent search among the records of his experience and recollected all

God's manifest and manifold interpositions, he began to ask whether God

could be fickle and capricious, whether His mercy was exhausted and His

promise withdrawn, whether He had forgotten His covenant of grace, and

shut up His fountains of love.

Thus we follow the Psalmist through six stages of unbelief:

1. The thought of God is a burden instead of a blessing.

2. The complaining spirit increases toward God.

3. His spirit is agitated instead of soothed and calmed.

4. Sleep departs, and anxiety forbids repose of heart.

5. Trouble only deepens and God seems far off.

6. Memory recalls God's mercies, but only to awaken distrust.

At last we reach the _turning-point_ in the psalm: he asks as he reviews

former experiences, WHERE IS THE DIFFERENCE? IS THE CHANGE IN GOD OR IN

ME? "Selah"--the pause marks this turning-point in the argument or

experience.

"And I said, This is _my infirmity."_ In other words, "I HAVE BEEN A

FOOL!" God is faithful. He never casts off. His children are always dear

to Him. His grace is exhaustless and His promise unfailing. Instead of

fixing his eyes on his trouble he now fixes his whole mind on God. He

remembers His work, and meditates upon it; instead of rehearsing his own

trials, he talks of His doings. He gets overwhelmed now, not with the

greatness of his troubles, but the greatness of his Helper. He recalls

His miracles of power and love, and remembers the mystery of His mighty

deeds--His way in the sea, His strange dealings and leadings and their

gracious results--and so faith once more triumphs.

What is the conclusion, the practical lesson?

Unbelief is folly. It charges God foolishly. Man's are the weakness and

failure, but never God's. My faith may be lacking, but not His power.

Memory and meditation, when rightly directed, correct unbelief. God has

shown Himself great. He has always done wonders. He led even an

unbelieving and murmuring people out of Egypt and for forty years

through the wilderness, and His miracles of power and love were

marvelous.

The psalm contains a _great lesson._ Affliction is inevitable. But our

business is never to lose sight of the Father who will not leave His

children. We are to roll all burdens on Him and wait patiently, and

deliverance is sure. Behind the curtain He carries on His plan of love,

never forgetting us, always caring for His own. His ways of dealing we

cannot trace, for His footsteps are in the trackless sea, and unknown to

us. But HE IS SURELY LEADING, and CONSTANTLY LOVING. Let us not be

fools, but pray in faith to a faithful God.

This is the substance of that morning exposition, and is here given very

inadequately, it is true, yet it serves not only to illustrate Mr.

Muller's mode of expounding and applying the Word, but the exposition of

this psalm is a sort of exponent also of his life. It reveals his habits

of prayer, the conflicts with unbelief, and how out of temptations to

distrust God he found deliverance; and thus is doubly valuable to us as

an experimental commentary upon the life-history we are studying.

George Müller of Bristol, and His Witness to a Prayer-Hearing God · 第 21 / 25 章