Here the manuscript ended abruptly, and it seemed to one or two experts

present that these last lines were in a somewhat different ink from the

rest, and looked like a later addition. But these profitably held their

peace. And as it was a tremendous feather in the caps of the assembled

Brahmins to have discovered the long lost Crow, they made the most of

him.

Whereupon the Crow fell into a trance, which lasted many hours. And

when he recovered, he narrated how Rama had appeared unto him in a

vision, and assured him that every one of the Brahmins there present

was destined to become a number-one god in the next generation, and

to keep on rising for nine hundred and ninety-four million _Kalpacs_,

and then attain Nirvana; also that the whole party, including himself,

while here on earth, would be deemed incapable of committing any sin

or crime. He had indeed received, as a first instalment of plenary

indulgence, a special dispensation and injunction to drink _aràk_

toddy in honour of Rama, to be supplied to him by the Sacred College.

Whereupon he was invested with the yellow thread, and declared to be a

saint.

* * * * *

It was midnight, and Flaxius and Dschim Crow sat on either side of a

pearl-inlaid table, on seats set with gems, and between them was the

Holy Bottle with gold cups.

‘_Well!_’ observed Flaxius, ‘of all the in-fer-nal, lying, cold-frozen,

brazen, impudent, cheeky humbugs whom I ever encountered on earth,

thou, my son, dost take the cake! But yesterday a Pariah, and to-day

directing all the Brahmins as their chief!’

‘_Que veux-tu, mon vieux?_’ replied the Holy Crow, who in his new

capacity of divine of course divined all the languages of the future:

‘Surely ’tis not by modesty

That gods attain to what they be:

For face, and cheek, since time began,

Were aye the noblest part of man,

And he who hath but impudence

To all things hath sublime pretence.

For the very essence of the most orthodox religion is that man is to be

saved by faith alone, good works being only manifestations of faith;

and of all faith ever roasted or toasted, stewed or brewed in the

kitchen of theology, there is none like a holy faith in one’s own self,

pious auto-reliance, devout assurance, divine audacity, and sanctified

looking-down on everybody, which latter is the true secret of all

ecclesiastical supremacy and influence, as we saints well know.

‘And note you, that this full faith and belief in oneself is neither

egoism nor egotism, but only religion _directed inward_, devotion

which has gone to the heart instead of striking outward into

Pharisaical displays of modesty, wherewith the world is more deluded

and gulled than by all the good honest boldness ever obtruded on it.

For he who believes in his lucky star brings to the battle of life

nine-tenths of victory. Therefore, O illustrious patron, I pray you

believe that this which you call Cheek in me is indeed no vanity or

idle desire to be admired by the world, for which I verily do not care

three straws, esteeming its praise or blame as all stuff and taradiddle:

‘Trumpery, trash, rubbish and hum,

_Fatras_, frippery, bubble and scum,

Leather-prunella, drugs and chaff,

Refuse, sweepings, sediment, raff,

Trifling, paltry, petty or small;

Frivolous stuff worth nothing at all,

Hardly anything, no great shakes;

_Peu de chose_ and as farthing stakes,

Gimcracks, whim-whams, gammon and sells,

Fiddlestick, fudge and bagatelles,

Paltry, pitiful two-penny flams,

Fribbling, beggarly, pitiful crams;

Not worth mentioning, nor a rush,

Stuff and nonsense, humbug and tush!

‘For verily at _that_, and nothing more, do I esteem vanity and

the notice of the world or personal notoriety, or puffs, while, to

my taste, all applause, homage, hero-worship, clapping, hosannahs,

glorification and acclamation, raw or cooked, save so far that there

is _Fun_ in it all, may go to the devil and shake itself! But he who

is what you may call self-superstitious, or guided in all things,

as he thinks, by a _dæmon_ or star, or fairy, or fate, or strange

omens, by occult desires, and coincidences, always becomes strangely

self-confident, and yet not _vain_ or egoistic, because he feels as if

he were a wheelbarrow trundled by his god--

‘Or a top spun by a boy,

Or clay in the potter’s hands,

Or dough being kneaded,

Or a horse in harness,

Or paper under the pen,

Or a maid taken by force,

Or potatoes being mashed,

Or type being set,

Or a garment being shaped,

Or a rocket set fire to,

Or a fiddle being played,

Or an arrow shot from a bow,

Or a cake being mixed,

Or a twine in cat’s-cradle,

Or a sermon being preached,

Or a puppet being played,

Or a pig driven to market,

Or a football in a game,

Or a top being spun,

Or a boat being steered,

or anything or anybody under external direction. Now the egoist

believes himself to be, and the vain man is sure that he is, the actor

and the thing acted on, all in one, but the blind believer in self is

only confident that he is well-directed. _Eccomi!_’

‘A subtle distinction,’ said Flaxius, ‘and not without truth.’

‘Moreover, and this should be noted,’ resumed the Holy Crow, ‘he who

is by God’s grace even a little of a Humourist is above all men most

likely to be misunderstood in this matter. For verily, I swear by this

Holy Bottle, that when _I_ took no notice of the Gūrū, for which Shiva

wished to send me to hell, ’twas not from vanity of great wisdom, (as

those lying old devils the Brahmins declared), but just to see what

sort of a rum face he would cut; and when I disputed with the son of

Brahma as to the divine attributes of his father, I hope I may be

split, salted and dried in hell like a fish, if it was that I pretended

to know more about the Governor than he did, devil a bit! Nay, it

was only that the fiend of Fun inspired me to a stupendous, palpable

absurdity, which, rightly understood, was an act of the deepest

reverence. But the Rishi was a fool, even as the Brahmins and old Vish

himself were also, and Shiv into the bargain.’

‘I believe thee, O Crow,’ replied Flaxius, ‘and it is true that the

dull world often attributes to self-conceit that which is truly an

artistic or humorously inspired conception. Many a creator and artist

have I seen carried away by pride or faith in his inspiration, who had,

God wot! little pride in himself. But, O Dschim Crow, he had, as thou

ever hast, the sublime enjoyment of the joke, or idea, albeit gods and

men missed the point!’

‘Amen,’ quoth the Crow. ‘Let us drink!’

‘And now,’ quoth Flaxius, ‘that the sun shines, thou wilt, I suppose,

begin to make hay, or lay up money for the rainy days.’

‘By the Wheel of Heaven, not I!’ exclaimed the Crow. ‘He that saves up

money keeps it from circulating, which is a great crime, yea, a robbery

of the widow and the orphan. Albeit, should such a chance occur of

saving up money at another man’s expense, as once befell me, I will not

say that I will utterly reject it. One ought to have cash in hand for

holy charities and small treats.’

‘I pray thee, tell me the tale,’ answered Flaxius.

‘That will I,’ exclaimed the Crow, after a drink. ‘Once upon a time,

when Bramadatta was reigning in Benares in Kasi, it befell that I

was born, and when I grew up I had a small place under the treasurer,

Bunder Shroff Kash.

‘One day I bewailed that I was poor, and the treasurer, overhearing me,

told it to the king at his elbow; and the king, calling me, said:

‘“Excellent young man, it is very easy to get rich. Remember that _a

penny saved is a penny earned_. Now to encourage, I will give thee an

order on the treasury, commanding that when thou shalt have saved a

penny it shall be doubled.”

‘“May your glory endure for ever, O Life of the World!” I replied; “but

while you are about it, make it _pence_.”

‘He did so, and the order was written. But the king forgot to limit the

payment! He thought I would only draw once, or a penny at a time, but I

knew a trick worth two of that. I went with my penny and drew another.

‘The next day I came and said, “I have saved twopence, pray pay the

equivalent.” The next day I brought fourpence, and the next eight; and

so it went on, till ere long the treasurer begged for credit. Now I

paid the treasurer a handsome percentage to keep quiet--and he quieted.

But at last the thing got beyond all bounds, and the treasurer one day

informed the king that he was bankrupt, and owed more than the whole

kingdom was worth, and all the world with it. For the sum due me was:

_Lakhs of Rupees_ 972,687,265,390,221.

‘Then the king got into a fine rage, and would fain have had me put to

death. But the treasurer said, “Your majesty, it would be better to

compromise with such a brilliant financier, and employ him to collect

the taxes”; which was done.

‘When this lesson was ended, the Supreme Deity, the All-Knowing One

himself, repeated this stanza:

‘“With humblest start on a trifling capital

A shrewd and able man will rise to wealth,

E’en as his breath can nurse a tiny flame.”

‘And there are many tables and fables in which something like this is

to be found, or will be, as, for instance, _The Jātakas from the Pali_,

edited by Professor E. B. Cowell, who will in a future age be known as

a great, good, wise, illustrious, and learned Sanskritist, and in the

Parables of _Buddhagosha and Dhammapady_ (or the Accused Irishman), and

the _Divyāvadāna_, and the _Kathā Sārit Sāgara_. But mine, note ye,

is the Original Jacobs, and the first true prototype, model, pattern,

precedent, protoplast, mould, ensample, matrix, and paradigm of them

all. All the rest of them being mere re-echoes, shadows, reflexes,

apographs, and adumbrations of mine. _Selah!_’

‘And how long dost thou expect to remain here in clover, O Incarnation

of Bhusanda, and favourite of Rama?’ inquired Flaxius.

‘I hope to run the machine of the Sacred College,’ replied the Crow,

critically eyeing his liquor, ‘till a spring breaks, or a screw comes

loose--or, what is quite as likely, till I find the affair is slow and

the fun giving out--when I will start as a _yoghi_ on a pilgrimage, or

a Banjari or Nāt--_jeckno covva miri hai_----’

‘’Tis all one to me,

Where on earth I be;

So I only pass the time in jollity,

Where the girls abound,

And good drink is found,

And a changing round of life I ever see.

With a tol-diddle,

And a rol-diddle,

And a tol-de-rol-de-rol-de diddle dee!

‘All-so, _camarado, buona sera_! Meet me again in life when life seems

dull!’

* * * * *

‘_Hæc fabula docet_,’ wrote Flaxius, ‘that in this life we should not

be too much guided by appearances. For, firstly, the Tale of Sakhara

and Arjun as it occurs in the _Asiatic Journal_ of 1829, whence it

was transferred by Grimm to his work on _Women’s Names derived from

Plants_, might seem to many to have been the original source, whereas

it is only a mutilated and abridged version, as appears from the fact

that I, who had so much to do with the plot, am not mentioned in it,

nor does Dschim Crow once occur in the story. Neither are there in it

those beautiful specimens of Indian poetry in the original Romany, or

Romanyana, dialect (allied to Sanskrit) which prove the fidelity of my

text.

‘Secondly, that the king did not surmise that there was any “working of

the oracle,” as regarded the shooting of the three arrows, or that the

will of the gods is sometimes managed even by such characters as the

Crow. For it was the Crow, indeed, who pulled all the wires, wrote the

lady’s letter, and told all the needful lies on this occasion.

‘Thirdly, that it came not to the surface, neither did it appear to

man, that Dschim Crow, who was an expert penman, added that little

postscript to the old manuscript.

‘Fourthly, that it is most probable that the vast majority of my

readers will fondly believe that I am the author of the old MS.

_History of Bhusanda_, whereas it is really given in the _Ramayana_,

and extracted therefrom by Nork in his _Symbolisches-mythologisches

Real-Wörterbuch_, vol. i. p. 259.

‘Fifthly, that Brahma, Siva, Vishnu and Co., including all the saints,

were utterly mistaken in the true character of the Crow [even as a

reviewer sometimes is at the present day when he adventures into

literature]. Now, this showing how the Hindoo Trinity made a fool

of itself firstly, by putting Pantagruelism into a Crow, and then

expecting to ever get it out, is, I am sure, one of those subtle

sarcasms of the Pariah literature, which worked its way into the

regular Scriptures, somewhat in the same way as the erotic, or

erratic, melodrama of the Song of Solomon was insinuated (probably by

some Hebrew joker) into the Old Testament.

‘Sixthly, that as there are substances, which to the vulgar sense

seem to be one and the same, yet which chemistry shows are radically

different elements, so there are natures like that of the Crow, which

do not care twopence for applause, or what the world thinks of them,

and yet are called _egoistic_ when their inspiration consists in

yielding to influences which, had they guided them, might indeed have

caused them to be called vain.

‘Seventhly, that the Crow, being incorrigible and incurable, will

continue to manifest himself as a poor devil, and be considered as “a

comic fella, doncher know,” and as nothing but a swell jester--until

gods and saints get more sense.’

[9] This exquisitely beautiful incantation poem will be readily

intelligible to every Sanskritist, with the exception perhaps of the

last line, which is in a later vulgar dialect. It means, accurately

translated: ‘I am a gypsy foot-traveller.’ In common dialect it would

be, ‘_Ro-mani pat-engro shom_.’ _Omani_ for ‘Romany’ occurs in _The

English Gypsies and their Language_.

THE WONDERFUL STORY OF MISS JESABELLE ROCKHARD

WITH A SERIOUS VINDICATION OF HER PROTOTYPES

OR FLAXIUS IN ENGLAND

‘And thus outspoke ye Oracle:

A very truth to thee I tell:

If thou canst a woman finde,

With such an earth-subduing minde

And with soule so stern and deepe,

That she can a secret keepe.

Then know of verie truth that she

A great Enchauntresse soon will be,

A queen in soothe or faery.’

IT was five o’clock tea at Lady Puddlebrooke’s--a somewhat famous

weekly rendezvous, which many called ‘The Meet,’ because there

assembled on the occasion so many gallant hunters of gossip, and

harriers of character, who were soon let slip in full cry of the

_chronique scandaleuse_ of the day. The which chronicle, be it

remarked, by the way, is by far the most wonderful flying leaf, as such

journals were once called, which was ever compiled, since every soul

implicitly believes that there is in it the name of Everybody else, and

that all which is said of others in it is true, while their own names

are never there--or, if there, invariably attached to falsehoods, and

out of place.

Now, while all the good Christians, philanthropists, nobly honest

agnostics, angelic virgins who had been presented, dignified and

ferocious matrons, clergymen, positivists, and other seekers after

truth, were--as a nasty, cynical journalist who was present,

remarked--‘ravening and battening on their garbage,’ which meant

repeating what they had read in the society papers, or preparing what

would soon appear in them, Flaxius had withdrawn to a quiet corner

and an easy sofa, where he was joined by Miss Jesabelle Rockhard, a

lady of whom all her friends said: ‘It certainly cannot be denied that

she is good-looking’; others limiting this praise to ‘_distinguée_,’

while some reduced it to ‘striking,’ which she certainly was, being a

hard hitter in conversation, and not above fibbing when it came to a

scratch. That she was ‘highly intelligent’ and an _esprit fort_, gifted

with the unscrupulousness which she herself graced with the name of

Will, was manifested at a glance, and impressively set forth by the

first utterance of her voice to any reader of the human heart.

She was between afternoon and twilight as regarded age, and of very

limited means; facts which she stated with the utmost candour to

everybody. Nor was she devoid of a certain intuition or clairvoyance

as regarded ability in others, as she had creditably shown by divining

that Flaxius was a character. She determined that she would draw him

out to the last hair, and completely ascertain all there was in him.

In forming this resolution she had, as the Americans express it,

unconsciously, ‘taken out a mighty big contract,’ which was the further

impeded by the fact that the party of the other part knew exactly how

much stock she held, and what was her capital, while she--poor little

soul--knew nothing at all as to the resources of the adversary.

But she came up to the assault gallantly. There was something in her

very smile with its pinch in the lips, and in the ring of her keen

voice, which seemed to say: ‘I’m arch and airy, with the gay, sarcastic

tone of society; you must accept all my stings with a delighted

air--and you’ll be in bad form if you don’t. Beware! beware!’

‘Ah, Mr. Flaxius, just as one would expect--withdrawn from the

gossiping, frivolous crowd. You set up to be intellectual, I believe.’

There are certain very common and very silly speeches of this kind

current, which tease sensible people, because they are hard to answer.

So true is it that a fool can roll a stone into a well which fifty wise

men cannot get out. But Flaxius replied with divine suavity:

‘If being out of the swim is a sign of setting up to be intellectual,

then, I suppose, as you are here, that you also advance the same claim,

and would fain remind me of it.’ Here the smile was beautifully genial,

as if to say: ‘’Tis all my fun.’

‘Confound his cheeky impudence!’ thought Miss Jesabelle. And she

promptly countered.

‘So you _do_ set up to be intellectual, then? Oh, you needn’t deny

it--you’ve admitted it.’

‘True,’ exclaimed Flaxius, ‘and I have heard from other people

the same of you. And yet I am not sure,’ he added, in so dreamy,

meditative a manner, that he seemed to be thinking of anything except

Miss Rockhard, ‘that ’tis not better to be able to set oneself up

independently--though ever so little--than to have to rely on others to

do it for us!’

And looking at Miss Jesabelle with a smile that was child-like and

bland, he added:

‘Ask me some more of those hard questions, please!’

‘I really believe,’ answered the lady with some acerbity (‘Aha!’

thought Flaxius, ‘the first blood drawn!’)--‘that you must have

belonged to the Disagreeable Club, whose members make a practice of

irritating and retorting, like cabmen.’

‘Ah!’ exclaimed Flaxius, ‘if I had not, I should have been indeed

ill-qualified for conversation with an advanced young lady of the _fin

de siècle_. How often she reminds me of a Spanish fairy-tale. May I

tell it?’ he asked, like a little boy.

‘Oh, certainly, if it amuses you,’ replied the young lady in a tone

half-contemptuously vexed, yet half interested in this extraordinary

stranger.

‘Once upon a time,’ said Flaxius, ‘there were three brothers, and the

two elder were a pair of awful blackguards.’

‘Truly, it begins beautifully!’ remarked Miss Rockhard scornfully.

‘Doesn’t it?’ quoth Flaxius gleefully. ‘And it’s nothing to what’s

a-coming. Well, there was a king of the country, and he had a beautiful

daughter--at least she was _distinguée_, or what you might call

_stunning_, for she was awful at being disagreeable, and could shut up

any man in chaff, or worse--not to draw it too fine. And if anybody

dared to answer her--oh, then she became angry!

‘Now the king, finding that his daughter kept his court all the time

in an uproar, issued a proclamation, saying that whoever could beat the

princess in abuse should have her to wife, and welcome. Then the two

elder brothers rejoiced, each being sure that he would win the prize.

But the younger, who was a sort of Saint Johnny, with no great gift of

the gab, went and sat sorrowfully in the woods, weeping to think he had

no chance to win the princess, and wishing he had passed his boyhood in

playing chuck-farthing, and hanging about the docks with other little

guttersnipes, and had not wasted it in going to school and church and

penny-readings.

‘And while he sat there weeping, and eating a great slice of

water-melon, mingling his tears with the seeds, there came by an Irish

fairy of his acquaintance.

‘“An’ what is it yees wape-in an’ bodderin’ about, _alanna_?” she asked

kindly.

‘Then the youth told her his trouble, and how he would like to win the

princess, but wanted that _copia verborum_, or elegant “fluency of

sass,” as it is called in America, which was necessary to secure it.

‘“Och, _monoma diaoul!_ and tear and agers!” exclaimed the fairy,

“sure, if it’s nothin’ but blay-gairdin’ is naded, it’s mesilf that’ll

tache ye how to bate thim all intoirely. Pattherin’ an’ cantin’ is it!

and me here that blissed the great Daniel O’Connell in his cradle, an’

gave him the illigant spache that shut up all the sass in Parliamint.

‘“Great O’Connell, the Libherather,

An’ salvathor of Oireland’s oisle!

‘“Whoop! _Fa-na-ballah_, and Erin-go-braugh!” cried the fairy as she

danced in a ring, brandishing her broom. “And now, ye divil, sit down

till I give yees a lisson in polite litherature.”

‘I forbear for certain reasons to give you the conversation which

occurred between the princess and the two brothers, in which they

were utterly silenced. Then, turning to the youngest, she exclaimed

scornfully:

‘“And I suppose you, with your white egg-fruit face of an idiotic

scallawag, set up for being intellectual--intellectual enough to smash

_me_--that is, if you know what the word means, you Number Three

Mackerel with the head gone!”

‘“It is just like your ante-penultimate superfluitancy to mundivagate

anent my candicancy,’ replied the youth indignantly. ‘Thou tramontarian

tomboy-trollope and trull-cat, thou quadruplicate quean, mopsy minx,

and metaphrastic harridame--reintegrated in thy deligration even to

conquassentiality--thou mere projectile of an eolipile--nay, I go so

far as to call thee a true ultimatum of the fourth effusion--dug up

by a divarication of conduplicated metatarsity--thou art all this as

thy conscience deterrates ... yea and thou art moreover addicted to

_lipothymy_ and all such enormities and vices!”

‘Thereupon the princess gave it to him back, with all that there is

in Grose’s _Slang Dictionary_, and Romany to boot--which was pretty

bad; but when he retorted with a passage from Browning’s _Sordello_,

she gave it up, and fell into a fit of rage, foaming at the mouth. And

having recovered, she married him, and they lived like the devil ever

after.’

Now Flaxius had the gift of voice, and with it that of the

story-teller, to the degree of well-nigh transcending language itself;

for one could read the full meaning of every word in his intonation,

and eyes and gestures; these latter were never extravagant, but

strangely significant, as they well might be, since he knew as only the

priests of old knew the wonderful Sign Language which men have found of

late years on every Etruscan vase--much of which is still found even

among the peasant-children of Italy. And as a small group of guests had

gathered round to hear the legend, there were roars of final laughter,

in which Miss Jesabelle herself joined with a good-will, for she had

begun to realise that there was a lion in this man, and as the story

had been told for _her_, she shrewdly made the very best of it.

‘You tell a fairy-tale so well,’ she said to Flaxius, when they were

again together, and no one near, ‘as to make one regret that there are

no more fairies or magic, or rather that such fancies never were.’

‘And if there were,’ replied the sage, ‘you and the world would still

necessarily remain in ignorance of them.’

‘Permit me,’ replied Miss Rockhard, ‘to differ with you. I _presume_,’

she added, with a slightly sarcastic expression, ‘that I am _quite_ as

likely as you are to be acquainted, or possibly familiar, with all that

has been investigated by science--the London Library and British Museum

being open to all--and I can assure you that despite Madame Blavatsky

and Mr. Sinnett and Colonel Olcott--very nice men they are--not the

slightest scientific proof of the existence of fairies or magic has

ever been detected.’

‘Very true,’ rejoined Flaxius imperturbably. ‘I did not say that

they existed. I only assert that, from the very nature of things,

if they do, they _must_ be concealed from man as he now is. The more

indubitable proof of such occult matters would bring about a premature

confusion in humanity which would have disastrous results.’

Flaxius · 第 12 / 20 段