THE RELIGION OF THE ANCIENT ARMENIANS

“And Noah builded an altar unto the Lord.” Gen. 9:20. “Our earth owes

the seeds of all higher culture to religious traditions, whether

literary or oral.”--_Herdee._

The Bible, modern scholarship and Armenian traditions agree that the

ark of Noah rested “upon the mountains of Ararat,” or Armenia. We

learn from the Bible, that Noah came out of the ark and all those that

were with him, and he builded an altar unto the Lord “and offered

burnt offerings on the Altar.” This fact justifies Armenia’s claim to

be the first country where a true and pure divine worship was again

practised after the Deluge. The tradition of the Armenians coincides

with the truth revealed in the Bible and with the results of modern

scholarship, that the primitive religion of mankind was a pure and

simple monotheism, in form patriarchal. Prof. Max Müller of Oxford,

England, says “Religion is not a new invention. It is, if not as old

as the world, at least as old as the world we know. As soon almost as

we know anything of the thoughts and feelings of man, we find him in

possession of religion, or rather possessed by religion.”

The Bible furnishes sufficient facts to assert that this pure

monotheism in its patriarchal form was perpetuated among the immediate

descendants of Noah, and later especially in the line of Abraham. Many

centuries after the building of the first altar unto the Lord we find

Abraham called by Jehovah out of his country and from his people to

become the head of a nation through whom the knowledge of the only one

true God should be perpetrated. God’s call of Abraham was not for the

purpose of making a true worshiper of him, but that through him the

true worship of Jehovah might be perpetuated. The Lord said “I will

make of thee a great nation.”

Another example of the true worshiper of God in the time of Abraham was

Melchizedek (King of righteousness), King of Salem (peace), “who was

the high priest of the most high God.”[35] Melchizedek was not only a

monotheist, but also the priest of a monotheistic faith. He reigned

over his people on whose behalf he officiated as the high priest of the

most high God. Now, therefore, it ought to be admitted that not only

solitary individuals, like Abraham and Melchizidek, but the people of

the latter also were true worshipers of God.

The Bible is not a universal history of mankind. Were it so, well

might we have expected it to mention other nations and their early

religious beliefs; though what little it incidentally states in regard

to them is marvelously accurate. The Armenian tradition that their

primitive religion was monotheism, therefore, is neither incredible

nor inconceivable, but on the contrary, it is most probable and is

supported by the analogy of the Bible record.

The investigations of modern scholarship maintain the idea and

render it almost a moral demonstration that the primitive religions

of the ancient nations were of a monotheistic type or if not a pure

monotheism, at least not very far from it. Prof. Max Müller, in his

lectures on the “Origin and Growth of Religion,” says: “The Ancient

Aryans felt from the beginning, aye, it may be more in the beginning

than afterwards, the presence of a Beyond[36] of an Infinite, of a

Divine, or whatever else we may call it now; and they tried to grasp

and comprehend it, as we all do, by giving to it name after name.” It

is conceded by the scholars that the ancient Armenians were closely

connected with the ancient Aryans (See Chap. II), indeed that they

were Aryans, and their legitimate descendants now speak a language

which modern ethnologists decidedly pronounce to belong to Aryan or

Indo-Germanic origin. Although we do not know when the separation of

the Aryans took place, we can safely say that the above statement of

Prof. Max Müller is also perfectly applicable to the ancient Armenians;

yet we are not able to say how long such a purity of faith prevailed in

Armenia.

The human mind is capable of progress, but when it is left to itself

is sure to retrograde and degenerate. This is verified in the case

of almost all nations and in the history of all the religions of

the world. “That religion is liable to corruption is surely seen

again and again. In one sense the history of most religions might

be called a slow corruption of their primitive purity.” Divine aid,

especially in religion, is therefore absolutely necessary for a true

progress. Armenia left to herself fell into a gross form of idolatry.

Her fall must have been hastened, if not caused, by her idolatrous

neighbors, the Babylonians and Assyrians. For the idolatry which we

find in the early history of the country is decidedly like that of

Assyro-Babylonian. It is not the same religion adopted and practised by

the inhabitants, but it is modeled after the Assyrian.

Anterior to the cuneiform inscriptions of Armenia the people must have

had an idolatry similar to the Sabeism (Sabianism) of Babylonia, which

was afterwards modeled to the Assyrian style, with its distinctive

character. One of the inscriptions furnishes a long list of the gods

and the regulations for sacrifices daily to be offered to them. There

are, however, three other gods, which stood apart by themselves at

the head of the Pantheon. These are Khaldis, Tusbas (the air god) and

Adinis (the sun god). But Khaldis is the supreme god and the father

of other gods; and in addition to these every tribe, and city and

fortress seem to have its respective god. Some other gods are Avis or

Auis (the water god), Agas (the earth god), Dhuspuas (the god of Tosp,

the City of Van), Selardis (the moon god), Sardis (the year god). The

Armenians, in this period, do not seem to have any goddess. Saris

is found only mentioned once in the inscriptions and is translated

“queen,” yet it is supposed to have been borrowed from the Assyrian

Istar. Whether all the other gods are the children of the supreme god

Khaldis, or are subordinate to him and separate from his numerous

offsprings, it is not quite clear; the latter, however, is most likely

the case, because the Kaldians (the children of Khaldis) and other

gods have their separate offerings assigned to them according to their

importance.

With the rise of the Medo-Persian empire a new religion rises from

obscurity to prominence in western Asia. This is the religion of

Zoroaster. It is generally believed that Zoroaster was a real person

and the founder of this religion, which is called after his name,

Zoroastrianism. There is, however, great uncertainty about the period

of his existence; some would make him contemporary with David or

Solomon. It is probable that he lived in a much later time than these

Israelitish kings.

The religion of Zoroaster is dualistic. It teaches that there are two

uncreated beings. Ormazd, the supreme good, and Ahriman, the evil;

that Ormazd created the earth, the heavens, and man, and that man is

created free; Ahriman is the evil and evil-doer, and in constant war

with Ormazd; this world is their battlefield. There are inferior (good

and bad) spirits which are called _genii_, who are the instruments of

Ormazd (the good spirits) and Ahriman (the bad spirits). Fire alone was

the personification of the son of Ormazd, and therefore an object of

veneration.[37]

The Magi were the priests of Zoroastrianism, with a high priest of this

order who was called in the Armenian language _Mogbed_ (the head or the

leader of Magi). No doubt this was the religion of the Armenians for

nearly eight centuries (550 B.C. to 275 or 280 A.D.), possibly with

some modifications and additions from the Grecian polytheism after the

conquest of Alexander the Great. The Roman deifications of her emperors

did not effect Armenia.

Armenia, a martyr nation A historical sketch of the Armenian people from traditional times to the present tragic days · 第 37 / 102 题