Mr. SLACK. There is a little discrepancy----

Mr. HUBERT. Yes; I'm going to give you an opportunity to explain them.

For the purpose of identification I am marking what purports to be

a copy of a letter addressed to Mr. J. E. Curry, chief of police,

apparently signed by Willie B. Slack, dated November 27, 1963. I am

marking it "Dallas, Texas, March 31. 1963, Exhibit No. 5116, deposition

of W. B. Slack." Putting my name below it. It has only one page. For

the purpose of identification, I am marking what purports to be an FBI

interview of Willie B. Slack by Agents Hardin and Scott, which took

place on December 2, 1963. I am marking the first page of that document

with the following, "Dallas, Texas, March 31, 1964. Exhibit No. 5117.

Deposition of W. B. Slack," and signing my name, and on the second page

thereof, on the lower right-hand corner I am placing my initial. Now,

Patrolman Slack, I show you the document marked Exhibit 5116, and ask

you if you have read it, and if it is a correct statement?

Mr. SLACK. All right.

Mr. HUBERT. Is that a correct statement?

Mr. SLACK. Yes.

Mr. HUBERT. So that the record may show that we are both talking about

the same thing, same document, I wonder if you will just put your name

below mine. Now, we will refer to a document--in two pages--that I have

marked a moment ago for identification as "5117," and ask you if you

have read that, and if that is correct, or if you have any corrections

or observation or comments to make with reference to that document? For

the purpose of identification will you mark these two documents with

your name where my name is, and with your initials where my initials

are, and then you can make the comments if you want to correct it or

modify it and so forth.

Warren Commission (12 of 26): Hearings Vol. XII (of 15) · 第 330 / 425 题