Mr. FRAZIER. And, he received the call I understand here, and it goes
into, "I represent a committee that--it is neither right nor left
wing," and so forth. I didn't get all that in the conversation with
Newsom, that I recall. Newsom told me that a group of men, I believe he
indicated a hundred or two were going to kill Oswald the following day,
the day after the night--or, you know, the next day or two. Now, that
was essentially what he told me.
Mr. HUBERT. Do you say he didn't tell you that had been received by
Glassup?
Mr. FRAZIER. No, sir; he said they received information, or threats.
Mr. HUBERT. Nor did he give you the exact language of the threat, as
indicated in that?
Mr. FRAZIER. No, sir; he did not.
Mr. HUBERT. He simply told you that they had received the threat and
the sense of the threat was along the lines of the paragraph, first
paragraph?
Mr. FRAZIER. Yes, sir.
Mr. HUBERT. But, neither mentioned Glassup's name, nor did he speak the
exact quoted language which--when he spoke to you?
Mr. FRAZIER. That's right.
Mr. HUBERT. Now, what about the next paragraph, second paragraph?
Mr. FRAZIER. Yes, sir; that is essentially correct. However, I believe
he did advise the Dallas sheriff's office had received a similar call.
That is essentially correct, that paragraph.
Mr. HUBERT. All right; what about the third paragraph?
Mr. FRAZIER. The third paragraph, I don't recall making that statement.
Mr. HUBERT. What about the fourth paragraph?
Mr. FRAZIER. Because, at that time, I did not know exactly what the
plans were to move Oswald, see.
Mr. HUBERT. And what about the last paragraph?
Mr. FRAZIER. No, sir; no, sir.
Mr. HUBERT. You mean to say that you do not recall?
Mr. FRAZIER. No, sir; I do not recall making that statement to Mr.
Newsom.
Mr. HUBERT. I would like for you to do this then with reference to that
document. Just place the word, next to the last paragraph, "incorrect,"
and initial it.
Mr. FRAZIER. All right, sir.
Mr. HUBERT. Have you initialled it?
Mr. FRAZIER. Yes, sir.