SECTION III.

_Further observations from the same Paper—Epoch of the destruction of the

said Forest—Agency by which it was effected_, _&c.—Similar appearances

eastward along the Norfolk coast_.

“Such a wide-spread assemblage of vegetable ruins, lying almost in

the same level, and that level generally under the common mark of low

water, must naturally strike the observer, and give birth to the

following questions: 1. What is the epoch of this destruction? 2. By

what agency was it effected?

“In answer to these questions I will venture to submit the following

reflections: The fossil remains of vegetables hitherto dug up in so

many parts of the globe, are, on a close inspection, found to belong

to two different states of our planet. The parts of vegetables and

their impressions, found in mountains, of a colaceous and schistous,

or even sometimes of a calcareous nature, are chiefly of plants now

existing between the tropics, which would neither have grown in the

latitudes in which they are dug up, nor have been carried and

deposited there by any of the acting forces under the present

constitution of nature. The formation indeed of the very mountains

in which they are buried, and the nature and position of the

materials which compose them, are such as we cannot account for by

any actions and re-actions which in the actual state of things take

place on the surface of the earth. We must necessarily recur to that

period in the history of our planet, when the surface of the ocean

was at least so much above its present level as to cover even the

summits of those secondary mountains which contain the remains of

tropical plants. The changes which these vegetables have suffered in

their substance is almost total; they commonly retain only the

external configuration of what they were. Such is the state in which

they are found in England by Lhwyd; in France by Jussicu; and in the

Netherlands by Burtin; not to mention instances in more distant

countries. Some of the impressions or remains of plants found in

soils of this nature which were, by the more ancient and enlightened

oryctologists, supposed to belong to plants actually growing in

temperate and cold climates, seem, on accurate investigation, to have

been part of exotic vegetables. In fact, whether we suppose them to

have grown near the spot where they are found, or to have been

carried thither from different parts by the force of an impelling

flood, it is equally difficult to conceive how organized beings,

which, in order to live, require such a vast difference in

temperature and seasons, could live on the same spot, or how their

remains could (from climates so widely distant) be brought together

in the place by one common dislocating cause. To this ancient order

of fossil vegetables belong whatever retains a vegetable shape found

in or near coalmines, and (to judge from the places where they have

been found) the greater part of the agatized woods. But from the

species and state of the trees which are the subject of this memoir,

and from the situation and nature of the soil in which they are

found, it seems very clear that they do not belong to the primeval

order of vegetable ruins.

“The second order of fossil vegetables comprehend those which are

found in the strata of clay or sand; materials which are the result

of slow depositions of the sea and of rivers, agents still at work

under the present constitution of our planet. These vegetable

remains are found in such flat countries as may be considered to be a

new formation. The vegetable organization still subsists, at least

in part; and their vegetable substance has suffered a change only in

colour, smell, or consistence; alterations which are produced by the

development of their oily and bitumenous parts, or by their natural

progress towards rottenness. Such are the fossil vegetables found in

Cornwall by Borlase; in Essex, by Derham; in Yorkshire by Dela Prime

and Richardson; and in foreign countries by other naturalists. These

vegetables are found at different depths; some of them much below the

present level of the sea, but in clayey and sandy strata (evidently

belonging to modern formation); and have, no doubt, been carried from

their original place and deposited there by the force of great rivers

or currents, as it has been observed with respect to the Mississippi.

In many instances, however, these trees and shrubs are found standing

on their roots, and generally in low or marshy places above, or very

little below the level of the sea.

“To this last description of fossil vegetables the decayed trees here

described certainly belong. They have not been transported by

currents or rivers; but though standing in their native soil, we

cannot suppose the level in which they are found to be the same as

that in which they grew. It would be impossible for any of these

trees or shrubs to vegetate so near the sea, and below the common

level of its water. The waves would cover such tracts of land, and

hinder any vegetation. We cannot conceive that the surface of the

ocean has ever been any lower than it is now; on the contrary we are

led, by numberless phenomena to believe that the level of the water

in our globe is now below what it was in former periods. We must

therefore conclude, that the forest here described grew in a level

high enough to permit its vegetation; and that the force (whatever it

was) which destroyed it, lowered the level of the ground where it

stood.

“There is a force of subsidence (particularly in soft ground) which

being a natural consequence of gravity, slowly, though imperceptibly

operating, has its action sometimes quickened and rendered sudden by

extraneous causes; for instance, by earthquakes. The slow effects of

this force of subsidence have been accurately remarked in many

places: examples also of its sudden action are recorded in almost

every history of great earthquakes.—In England, Borlase has given in

the Philosophical Transactions a curious observation of a subsidence

of at least sixteen feet in the ground between Sampson and Trecaw

islands in Scilly. The soft and low grounds between the towns of

Thorne and Gowle in Yorkshire, a space of many miles, has so much

subsided in latter times, that some old men of Thorne affirmed, “that

whereas they could before see little of the Steeples (of Gowle) they

now see the church yard wall.” The instances of similar subsidence

which might be mentioned, are innumerable.

“The force of subsidence, suddenly acting by means of some

earthquake, seems to me the most probable cause to which the usual

submarine situation of the forest we are speaking of may be ascribed.

It affords a simple easy explanation of the matter; its probability

is supported by numberless instances of similar events; and it is not

liable to the strong objections which exist against the hypothesis of

the ultimate depression and elevation of the level of the ocean; an

opinion which, to be credible, requires the support of a great number

of proofs less equivocal than those which have hitherto been urged in

its favour, even by the genius of Lavoisier.

“The stratum of soil, sixteen feet thick, placed above the decayed

trees, seems to remove the epoch of their sinking and destruction far

beyond the reach of any historical knowledge. In Cæsar’s time the

level of the north sea appears to have been the same as in our days.

He mentions the separation of the Wahal branch of the Rhine, and its

junction with the Meuse; noticing the then existing distance from

that junction to the sea, which agrees according to D’Anville’s

inquiries, with the actual distance. Some of the Roman roads,

constructed according to the order of Augustus, under Agrippa’s

administration, leading to the maritime towns of Belgium, still

exist, and reach the present shore. The description which Roman

authors have given of the coast, ports, and mouths of rivers, on both

sides of the North sea, agree in general with their present state;

except in places ravaged by the inroads of this sea, more apt from

its force to destroy the surrounding countries than to increase them.

“An exact resemblance exists between maritime Flanders and the

opposite coast of England, both in point of elevation above the sea,

and of the internal structure and arrangement of the soils. On both

sides strata of clay, silt, and sand, (often mixed with decayed

vegetables) are found near the surface; and in both, these superior

materials cover a very deep stratum of blueish or dark coloured clay,

unmixed with extraneous bodies. On both sides they are the lowermost

part of the soil, existing between two ridges of high lands, on their

respective sides of the same narrow sea. These two countries are

certainly coeval; and whatever proves that maritime Flanders has been

for many ages out of the sea, must, in my opinion, prove also that

the forest we are speaking of was long before that time destroyed and

buried under a stratum of soil. Now it seems proved from historical

records, carefully collected by several learned members of the

Brussels Academy, that no material change has happened in the

lowermost part of maritime Flanders during the period of the last two

thousand years.

“I am therefore inclined to suppose the original catastrophe which

buried this forest to be of very ancient date; but I suspect the

inroad of the sea which uncovered the decayed trees of the islands of

Sutton, to be comparatively recent. The state of the leaves and of

the timber, and also the tradition of the neighbouring people concur

to strengthen this suspicion.”

The reader, it is hoped, will excuse, and even approve the length of this

curious extract, as it seems so well calculated to account for and

elucidate divers striking phenomena in the natural history of the Fens.

Here it may not be improper further to observe, that the forest above

described seems to have extended from the coast of Lincolnshire a

considerable way along the Norfolk coast; as there is on the shore, near

Thornham in that county, at low water, the appearance of a large forest

having been, at some period, interred and swallowed up by the waves.

Stools of numerous large timber trees, and many trunks, are to be seen,

but so rotten, that they may be penetrated by a spade. These lie in a

black mass of vegetable fibres, consisting of decayed branches, leaves,

rushes, flags, &c. The extent of this once sylvan tract [on the Norfolk

coast] must have been great, from what is discoverable; and at high

water, now covered by the tides, is in one spot from five to six-hundred

acres. No hint of the manner, or the time, in which this submersion

happened, can be traced. Nothing like a bog is near, and the whole beach

besides is composed of a fine ooze, or marine clay. {49}

The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2] · 第 3 / 21 章