And then he goes on to say--

" But yet did oftener tell a tale

Of more prevailing sadness."

But there was such a golden moment--it was in 1795--it was on the

mission of Lord Fitzwilliam. At that moment it is historically

clear that the Parliament of Grattan was on the point of solving

the Irish problem. The two great knots of that problem were, in

the first place, Roman Catholic emancipation; and in the second

place, the Reform of Parliament. The cup was at her lips, and she

was ready to drink it, when the hand of England rudely and

ruthlessly dashed it to the ground in obedience to the wild and

dangerous intimations of an Irish faction.

"Ex illo fluere ac retro sublapsa referri,

Spes Danaum."

There has been no great day of hope for Ireland, no day when you

might hope completely and definitely to end the controversy, till

now--more than ninety years. The long periodic time has at last

run out, and the star has again mounted into the heavens. What

Ireland was doing for herself in 1795 we at length have done. The

Roman Catholics have been emancipated--emancipated after a woeful

disregard of solemn promises through twenty-nine years,

emancipated slowly, sullenly, not from good will, but from abject

terror, with all the fruits and consequences which will always

follow that method of legislation. The second problem has been

also solved, and the representation of Ireland has been

thoroughly reformed; and I am thankful to say that the franchise

was given to Ireland on the readjustment of last year with a free

heart, with an open hand, and the gift of that franchise was the

last act required to make the success of Ireland in her final

effort absolutely sure. We have given Ireland a voice; we must

all listen for a moment to what she says. We must all listen--

both sides, both parties, I mean as they are, divided on this

question--divided, I am afraid, by an almost immeasurable gap. We

do not undervalue or despise the forces opposed to us. I have

described them as the forces of class and its dependents; and

that as a general description--as a slight and rude outline of a

description--is, I believe, perfectly true. I do not deny that

many are against us whom we should have expected to be for us. I

do not deny that some whom we see against us have caused us by

their conscientious action the bitterest disappointment. You have

power, you have wealth, you have rank, you have station, you have

organization. What have we? We think that we have the people's

heart; we believe and we know we have the promise of the harvest

of the future. As to the people's heart, you may dispute it, and

dispute it with perfect sincerity. Let that matter make its own

proof. As to the harvest of the future, I doubt if you have so

much confidence, and I believe that there is in the breast of

many a man who means to vote against us to-night a profound

misgiving approaching even to a deep conviction that the end will

be as we foresee, and not as you do--that the ebbing tide is with

you and the flowing tide is with us. Ireland stands at your bar

expectant, hopeful, almost suppliant. Her words are the words of

truth and soberness. She asks a blessed oblivion of the past, and

in that oblivion our interest is deeper than even hers. My right

honorable friend, the member for East Edinburgh (Mr. Goschen)

asks us to-night to abide by the traditions of which we are the

heirs. What traditions? By the Irish traditions? Go into the

length and breadth of the world, ransack the literature of all

countries, find, if you can, a single voice, a single book, find,

I would almost say, as much as a single newspaper article, unless

the product of the day, in which the conduct of England towards

Ireland is anywhere treated except with profound and bitter

condemnation. Are these the traditions by which we are exhorted

to stand? No; they are a sad exception to the glory of our

country. They are a broad and black blot upon the pages of its

history; and what we want to do is to stand by the traditions of

which we are the heirs in all matters except our relations with

Ireland, and to make our relations with Ireland to conform to the

other traditions of our country. So we treat our traditions--so

we hail the demand of Ireland for what I call a blessed oblivion

of the past. She asks also a boon for the future; and that boon

for the future, unless we are much mistaken, will be a boon to us

in respect of honor, no less than a boon to her in respect of

happiness, prosperity, and peace. Such, sir, is her prayer.

Think, I beseech you, think well, think wisely, think not for the

moment, but for the years that are to come, before you reject

this bill.

Ten Englishmen of the Nineteenth Century · 第 120 / 128 题