GEORGE STEPHENSON

[The bill for the charter of the Liverpool and Manchester railway

was referred to the Committee of the House of Commons, March 21,

1825. The canal companies had employed able counsel to oppose it.

A month was consumed before the company's engineer, Mr. George

Stephenson, was called by the Committee. The following account of

his first day's examination is from his fascinating biography by

Dr. Samuel Smiles.]

On the 25th George Stephenson was called into the witness-box. It

was his first appearance before a committee of the House of

Commons, and he well knew what he had to expect. He was aware

that the whole force of the opposition was to be directed against

him; and if they could break down his evidence, the canal

monopoly might yet be upheld for a time. Many years afterward,

when looking back at his position on this trying occasion, he

said: "When I went to Liverpool to plan a line from thence to

Manchester, I pledged myself to the directors to attain a speed

of ten miles an hour. I said I had no doubt the locomotive might

be made to go much faster, but that we had better be moderate at

the beginning. The directors said I was quite right; for that if,

when they went to Parliament, I talked of going at a greater rate

than ten miles an hour, I should put a cross upon the concern. It

was not an easy task for me to keep the engine down to ten miles

an hour, but it must be done, and I did my best. I had to place

myself in that most unpleasant of all positions--the witness-box

of a parliamentary committee. I was not long in it before I began

to wish for a hole to creep out at! I could not find words to

satisfy either the committee or myself. I was subjected to the

cross-examination of eight or ten barristers, purposely, as far

as possible, to bewilder me. Some member of the committee asked

if I was a foreigner, and another hinted that I was mad. But I

put up with every rebuff, and went on with my plans, determined

not to be put down."

George Stephenson stood before the committee to prove what the

public opinion of that day held to be impossible. The self-taught

mechanic had to demonstrate the practicability of accomplishing

that which the most distinguished engineers of the time regarded

as impracticable. Clear though the subject was to himself, and

familiar as he was with the powers of the locomotive, it was no

easy task for him to bring home his convictions, or even to

convey his meaning, to the less informed minds of his hearers. In

his strong Northumbrian dialect, he struggled for utterance, in

the face of the sneers, interruptions, and ridicule of the

opponents of the measure, and even of the committees, some of

whom shook their heads and whispered doubts as to his sanity when

he energetically avowed that he could make the locomotive go at

the rate of twelve miles an hour! It was so grossly in the teeth

of all the experience of honorable members, that the man "must

certainly be laboring under a delusion!"

And yet his large experience of railways and locomotives, as

described by himself to the committee, entitled this "untaught,

inarticulate genius," as he has been described, to speak with

confidence on the subject. Beginning with his experience as a

brakesman at Killingworth in 1803, he went on to state that he

was appointed to take the entire charge of the steam engines in

1813, and had superintended the railroads connected with the

numerous collieries of the grand allies from that time downward.

He had laid down or superintended the railways at Burradon, Mount

Moor, Springwell, Bedlington, Helton, and Darlington, besides

improving those at Killingworth, South Moor, and Derwent Crook.

He had constructed fifty-five steam-engines, of which sixteen

were locomotives. Some of these had been sent to France. The

engines constructed by him for the working of the Killingworth

Railroad, eleven years before, had continued steadily at work

ever since, and fulfilled his most sanguine expectations. He was

prepared to prove the safety of working high-pressure locomotives

on a railroad, and the superiority of this mode of transporting

goods over all others. As to speed, he said he had recommended

eight miles an hour with twenty tons, and four miles an hour with

forty tons; but he was quite confident that much more might be

done. Indeed he had no doubt they might go at the rate of twelve

miles. As to the charge that locomotives on a railroad would so

terrify the horses in the neighborhood that to travel on

horseback or to plow the adjoining fields would be rendered

highly dangerous, the witness said that horses learned to take no

notice of them, though there were horses that would shy at a

wheelbarrow. A mail-coach was likely to be more shied at by

horses than a locomotive. In the neighborhood of Killingworth,

the cattle in the fields went on grazing while the engines passed

them, and the farmers made no complaints.

Mr. Alderson, who had carefully studied the subject, and was well

skilled in practical science, subjected the witness to a

protracted and severe cross-examination as to the speed and power

of the locomotive, the stroke of the piston, the slipping of the

wheels upon the rails, and various other points of detail.

Stephenson insisted that no slipping took place, as attempted to

be extorted from him by the counsel. He said, "It is impossible

for slipping to take place so long as the adhesive weight of the

wheel upon the rail is greater than the weight to be dragged

after it." There was a good deal of interruption to the witness's

answers by Mr. Alderson, to which Mr. Joy more than once

objected. As to accidents, Stephenson knew of none that had

occurred with his engines. There had been one, he was told, at

the Middleton Colliery, near Leeds, with a Blenkinsop engine. The

driver had been in liquor, and put a considerable load on the

safety-valve, so that upon going forward the engine blew up and

the man was killed. But he added, if proper precautions had been

used with that boiler, the accident could not have happened. The

following cross-examination occurred in reference to the question

of speed:

"Of course," he was asked, "when a body is moving upon a road,

the greater the velocity the greater the momentum that is

generated?" "Certainly." "What would be the momentum of forty

tons moving at the rate of twelve miles an hour?" "It would be

very great." "Have you seen a railroad that would stand that?"

"Yea." "Where?" "Any railroad that would bear going four miles an

hour; I mean to say, that if it would bear the weight at four

miles an hour, it would bear it at twelve." "Taking it at four

miles an hour, do you mean to say that it would not require a

stronger railway to carry the same weight twelve miles an hour?"

"I will give an answer to that. I dare say every person has been

over ice when skating, or seen persons go over, and they know

that it would bear them better at a greater velocity than it

would if they went slower; when they go quick, the weight in a

measure ceases." "Is not that upon the hypothesis that the

railroad is perfect?" "It is; and I mean to make it perfect."

It is not necessary to state that to have passed through his

severe ordeal scatheless needed no small amount of courage,

intelligence, and ready shrewdness on the part of the witness.

Nicholas Wood, who was present on the occasion, has since stated

that the point on which Stephenson was hardest pressed was that

of speed. "I believe," he says, "that it would have lost the

company their bill if he had gone beyond eight or nine miles an

hour. If he had stated his intention of going twelve or fifteen

miles an hour, not a single person would have believed it to be

practicable." Mr. Alderson had, indeed, so pressed the point of

"twelve miles an hour," and the promoters were so alarmed lest it

should appear in evidence that they contemplated any such

extravagant rate of speed, that immediately on Mr. Alderson

sitting down, Mr. Joy proceeded to re-examine Stephenson, with

the view of removing from the minds of the committee an

impression so unfavorable, and as they supposed, so damaging to

their case. "With regard," asked Mr. Joy, "to all those

hypothetical questions of my learned friend, they have been all

put on the supposition of going twelve miles an hour; now that is

not the rate at which, I believe, any of the engines of which you

have spoken have traveled?" "No," replied Stephenson, "except as

an experiment for a short distance." "But what they have gone has

been three, five, or six miles an hour?" "Yes." "So that those

hypothetical cases of twelve miles an hour do not fall within

your general experience?" "They do not."

The committee also seem to have entertained some alarm as to the

high rate of speed which had been spoken of, and proceeded to

examine the witness farther on the subject. They supposed the

case of the engine being upset when going at nine miles an hour,

and asked what, in such a case, would become of the cargo astern.

To which the witness replied that it would not be upset. One of

the members of the committee pressed the witness a little

farther. He put the following case: "Suppose, now, one of these

engines to be going along a railroad at the rate of nine or ten

miles an hour, and that a cow were to stray upon the line and get

in the way of the engine; would not that, think you, be a very

awkward circumstance?" "Yes," replied the witness, with a twinkle

in his eye, "very awkward-for the cow!" The honorable member did

not proceed farther with his cross-examination; to use a railway

phrase, he was "shunted." Another asked if animals would not be

very much frightened by the engine passing at night, especially

by the glare of the red-hot chimney? "But how would they know

that it wasn't painted?" said the witness.

Ten Englishmen of the Nineteenth Century · 第 90 / 128 题