All this the Epicurean recounted. Alexander was much annoyed by the

exposure, and could not stomach so well deserved an affront; he directed

the company to stone the man, on pain of being involved in his impiety

and called Epicureans. However, when they set to work, a distinguished

Pontic called Demostratus, who was staying there, rescued him by

interposing his own body; the man had the narrowest possible escape from

being stoned to death--as he richly deserved to be; what business had he

to be the only sane man in a crowd of madmen, and needlessly make himself

the butt of Paphlagonian infatuation?

This was a special case; but it was the practice for the names of

applicants to be read out the day before answers were given; the herald

asked whether each was to receive his oracle; and sometimes the reply

came from within, To perdition! One so repulsed could get shelter, fire

or water, from no man; he must be driven from land to land as a

blasphemer, an atheist, and--lowest depth of all--an Epicurean.

In this connexion Alexander once made himself supremely ridiculous.

Coming across Epicurus's _Accepted Maxims_, the most admirable of

his books, as you know, with its terse presentment of his wise

conclusions, he brought it into the middle of the market-place, there

burned it on a fig-wood fire for the sins of its author, and cast its

ashes into the sea. He issued an oracle on the occasion:

The dotard's maxims to the flames be given.

The fellow had no conception of the blessings conferred by that book upon

its readers, of the peace, tranquillity, and independence of mind it

produces, of the protection it gives against terrors, phantoms, and

marvels, vain hopes and inordinate desires, of the judgement and candour

that it fosters, or of its true purging of the spirit, not with torches

and squills and such rubbish, but with right reason, truth, and

frankness.

Perhaps the greatest example of our rogue's audacity is what I now come

to. Having easy access to Palace and Court by Rutilianus's influence, he

sent an oracle just at the crisis of the German war, when M. Aurelius was

on the point of engaging the Marcomanni and Quadi. The oracle required

that two lions should be flung alive into the Danube, with quantities of

sacred herbs and magnificent sacrifices. I had better give the words:

To rolling Ister, swoln with Heaven's rain,

Of Cybelean thralls, those mountain beasts,

Fling ye a pair; therewith all flowers and herbs

Of savour sweet that Indian air doth breed.

Hence victory, and fame, and lovely peace.

These directions were precisely followed; the lions swam across to the

enemy's bank, where they were clubbed to death by the barbarians, who

took them for dogs or a new kind of wolves; and our forces immediately

after met with a severe defeat, losing some twenty thousand men in one

engagement. This was followed by the Aquileian incident, in the course of

which that city was nearly lost. In view of these results, Alexander

warmed up that stale Delphian defence of the Croesus oracle: the God had

foretold a victory, forsooth, but had not stated whether Romans or

barbarians should have it.

The constant increase in the number of visitors, the inadequacy of

accommodation in the city, and the difficulty of finding provisions for

consultants, led to his introducing what he called _night oracles_.

He received the packets, slept upon them, in his own phrase, and gave

answers which the God was supposed to send him in dreams. These were

generally not lucid, but ambiguous and confused, especially when he came

to packets sealed with exceptional care. He did not risk tampering with

these, but wrote down any words that came into his head, the results

obtained corresponding well enough to his conception of the oracular.

There were regular interpreters in attendance, who made considerable sums

out of the recipients by expounding and unriddling these oracles. This

office contributed to his revenue, the interpreters paying him L250 each.

Sometimes he stirred the wonder of the silly by answers to persons who

had neither brought nor sent questions, and in fact did not exist. Here

is a specimen:

Who is't, thou askst, that with Calligenia

All secretly defiles thy nuptial bed?

The slave Protogenes, whom most thou trustest.

Him thou enjoyedst: he thy wife enjoys--

The fit return for that thine outrage done.

And know that baleful drugs for thee are brewed,

Lest thou or see or hear their evil deeds.

Close by the wall, at thy bed's head, make search.

Thy maid Calypso to their plot is privy.

The names and circumstantial details might stagger a Democritus, till a

moment's thought showed him the despicable trick.

He often gave answers in Syriac or Celtic to barbarians who questioned

him in their own tongue, though he had difficulty in finding compatriots

of theirs in the city. In these cases there was a long interval between

application and response, during which the packet might be securely

opened at leisure, and somebody found capable of translating the

question. The following is an answer given to a Scythian:

Morphi ebargulis for night

Chnenchicrank shall leave the light.

Another oracle to some one who neither came nor existed was in prose.

'Return the way thou earnest,' it ran; 'for he that sent thee hath this

day been slain by his neighbour Diocles, with aid of the robbers Magnus,

Celer, and Bubalus, who are taken and in chains.'

I must give you one or two of the answers that fell to my share. I asked

whether Alexander was bald, and having sealed it publicly with great

care, got a night oracle in reply:

Sabardalachu malach Attis was not he.

Another time I did up the same question--What was Homer's birthplace?--in

two packets given in under different names. My servant misled him by

saying, when asked what he came for, a cure for lung trouble; so the

answer to one packet was:

Cytmide and foam of steed the liniment give.

As for the other packet, he got the information that the sender was

inquiring whether the land or the sea route to Italy was preferable. So

he answered, without much reference to Homer:

Fare not by sea; land-travel meets thy need.

I laid a good many traps of this kind for him; here is another. I asked

only one question, but wrote outside the packet in the usual form, So-

and-so's eight Queries, giving a fictitious name and sending the eight

shillings. Satisfied with the payment of the money and the inscription on

the packet, he gave me eight answers to my one question. This was, When

will Alexander's imposture be detected? The answers concerned nothing in

heaven or earth, but were all silly and meaningless together. He

afterwards found out about this, and also that I had tried to dissuade

Rutilianus both from the marriage and from putting any confidence in the

oracle; so he naturally conceived a violent dislike for me. When

Rutilianus once put a question to him about me, the answer was:

Night-haunts and foul debauch are all his joy.

It is true his dislike was quite justified. On a certain occasion I was

passing through Abonutichus, with a spearman and a pikeman whom my friend

the governor of Cappadocia had lent me as an escort on my way to the sea.

Ascertaining that I was the Lucian he knew of, he sent me a very polite

and hospitable invitation. I found him with a numerous company; by good

luck I had brought my escort. He gave me his hand to kiss according to

his usual custom. I took hold of it as if to kiss, but instead bestowed

on it a sound bite that must have come near disabling it. The company,

who were already offended at my calling him Alexander instead of Prophet,

were inclined to throttle and beat me for sacrilege. But he endured the

pain like a man, checked their violence, and assured them that he would

easily tame me, and illustrate Glycon's greatness in converting his

bitterest foes to friends. He then dismissed them all, and argued the

matter with me: he was perfectly aware of my advice to Rutilianus; why

had I treated him so, when I might have been preferred by him to great

influence in that quarter? By this time I had realized my dangerous

position, and was only too glad to welcome these advances; I presently

went my way in all friendship with him. The rapid change wrought in me

greatly impressed the observers.

When I intended to sail, he sent me many parting gifts, and offered to

find us (Xenophon and me, that is; I had sent my father and family on to

Amastris) a ship and crew--which offer I accepted in all confidence. When

the passage was half over, I observed the master in tears arguing with

his men, which made me very uneasy. It turned out that Alexander's orders

were to seize and fling us overboard; in that case his war with me would

have been lightly won. But the crew were prevailed upon by the master's

tears to do us no harm. 'I am sixty years old, as you can see,' he said

to me; 'I have lived an honest blameless life so far, and I should not

like at my time of life, with a wife and children too, to stain my hands

with blood.' And with that preface he informed us what we were there for,

and what Alexander had told him to do.

He landed us at Aegiali, of Homeric fame, and thence sailed home. Some

Bosphoran envoys happened to be passing, on their way to Bithynia with

the annual tribute from their king Eupator. They listened kindly to my

account of our dangerous situation, I was taken on board, and reached

Amastris safely after my narrow escape. From that time it was war between

Alexander and me, and I left no stone unturned to get my revenge. Even

before his plot I had hated him, revolted by his abominable practices,

and I now busied myself with the attempt to expose him; I found plenty of

allies, especially in the circle of Timocrates the Heracleot philosopher.

But Avitus, the then governor of Bithynia and Pontus, restrained me, I

may almost say with prayers and entreaties. He could not possibly spoil

his relations with Rutilianus, he said, by punishing the man, even if he

could get clear evidence against him. Thus arrested in my course, I did

not persist in what must have been, considering the disposition of the

judge, a fruitless prosecution.

Among instances of Alexander's presumption, a high place must be given to

his petition to the Emperor: the name of Abonutichus was to be changed to

Ionopolis; and a new coin was to be struck, with a representation on the

obverse of Glycon, and, on the reverse, Alexander bearing the garlands

proper to his paternal grandfather Asclepius, and the famous scimetar of

his maternal ancestor Perseus.

He had stated in an oracle that he was destined to live to a hundred and

fifty, and then die by a thunderbolt; he had in fact, before he reached

seventy, an end very sad for a son of Podalirius, his leg mortifying from

foot to groin and being eaten of worms; it then proved that he was bald,

as he was forced by pain to let the doctors make cooling applications to

his head, which they could not do without removing his wig.

So ended Alexander's heroics; such was the catastrophe of his tragedy;

one would like to find a special providence in it, though doubtless

chance must have the credit. The funeral celebration was to be worthy of

his life, taking the form of a contest--for possession of the oracle. The

most prominent of the impostors his accomplices referred it to

Rutilianus's arbitration which of them should be selected to succeed to

the prophetic office and wear the hierophantic oracular garland. Among

these was numbered the grey-haired physician Paetus, dishonouring equally

his grey hairs and his profession. But Steward-of-the-Games Rutilianus

sent them about their business ungarlanded, and continued the defunct in

possession of his holy office.

My object, dear friend, in making this small selection from a great mass

of material has been twofold. First, I was willing to oblige a friend and

comrade who is for me the pattern of wisdom, sincerity, good humour,

justice, tranquillity, and geniality. But secondly I was still more

concerned (a preference which you will be very far from resenting)

to strike a blow for Epicurus, that great man whose holiness and divinity

of nature were not shams, who alone had and imparted true insight into the

good, and who brought deliverance to all that consorted with him. Yet I

think casual readers too may find my essay not unserviceable, since it is

not only destructive, but, for men of sense, constructive also.

OF PANTOMIME

[Footnote: 'Pantomime' has been chosen as the most natural translation of

_orchaesis_, which in this dialogue has reference for the most part to the

ballet-dancer (_pantomimus_) of imperial times. On the other hand,

Lycinus, in order to establish the antiquity and the universality of an

art that for all practical purposes dates only from the Augustan era, and

(despite the Greek artists) is Roman in origin, avails himself of the

wider meaning of _orchaesis_ to give us the historic and prehistoric

associations of _dance_ in Greece and elsewhere; and in such passages it

seemed advisable to sacrifice consistency, and to translate _orchaesis_

dance.]

_Lycinus. Crato_

_Ly_. Here are heavy charges, Crato; I suppose you have been getting

up this subject for some time. You are not content with attacking the

whole pantomimic art, practical and theoretic; we too, the pleased

spectators thereof, come in for our share: we have been lavishing our

admiration, it seems, on effeminate triflers. And now let me show you how

completely you have been mistaken; you will find that the art you have

been maligning is the greatest boon of our existence. There is some

excuse for your strictures: how should you know any better, confirmed

ascetic that you are, believing that virtue consists in being

uncomfortable?

_Cr_. Now, my dear sir, can any one who calls himself a man, and an

educated man, and in some sort a student of philosophy,--can such a one

leave those higher pursuits, leave communing with the sages of old, to

sit still and listen to the sound of a flute, and watch the antics of an

effeminate creature got up in soft raiment to sing lascivious songs and

mimic the passions of prehistoric strumpets, of Rhodopes and Phaedras and

Parthenopes, to the accompaniment of twanging string and shrilling pipe

and clattering heel? It is too absurd: these are not amusements for a

gentleman; not amusements for Lycinus. When I first heard of your

spending your time in this way, I was divided betwixt shame and

indignation, to think that you could so far forget Plato and Chrysippus

and Aristotle, as to sit thus having your ears tickled with a feather. If

you want amusements, are there not a thousand things _worth_ seeing

and hearing? Can you not hear classical music performed at the great

festivals? Are there not lofty tragedy and brilliant comedy,--things that

have been deemed worthy of state recognition? My friend, you have a long

reckoning to settle with men of learning, if you would not be repudiated

altogether, and expelled from the congregation of the wise. I think your

best course will be a point-blank denial: declare flatly that you never

did anything of the kind. Anyhow, you must watch your conduct for the

future: we do not want to find that our Lycinus has changed his sex, and

become a Bacchante or a Lydian damsel. That would be as much to our

discredit as to yours: for ours should be Odysseus's part,--to tear you

from the lotus, and bring you back to your accustomed pursuits; to save

you from the clutches of these stage Sirens before it is too late. The

Sirens, after all, did but plot against men's ears; it needed but a

little wax, and a man might sail past them uninjured: but yours is a

captivity of ear and eye, of body and soul.

_Ly_. Goodness gracious! All the Cynic in you is loose, and snarls

at me. At the same time, I think your Lotus-and-Siren simile is rather

off the point: you see, the people who ate the Lotus and listened to the

Sirens paid for the gratification of ear and palate with their lives:

whereas I not only have a great deal more enjoyment than they had, but am

all the better for it. I have experienced no oblivion of my domestic

affairs, nor blindness to my own interests; in fact--if I may venture to

say so--you will find my penetration and practical wisdom considerably

increased by my theatrical experiences. Homer has it exactly: the

spectator

Returns a gladder and a wiser man.

_Cr_. Dear, dear! Yours is a sad case, Lycinus. You are not even ashamed;

you seem quite pleased with yourself. That is the worst of it: there seems

no hope of your recovery, while you can actually commend the mire in which

you wallow.

_Ly_. Now, Crato,--you talk of pantomimes and theatres,--have you seen

these performances yourself, that you are so hard on them? or do you

decide that they are 'foul mire' without personal experience? If you have

seen them, you are just as bad as I am; and if not, are you justified in

censuring them? does it not savour of over-confidence, to condemn what

you know nothing about?

_Cr_. Truly that would be the climax: that I should show my long beard and

white hairs amid that throng of women and lunatics; and clap and yell in

unseemly rapture over the vile contortions of an abandoned buffoon.

_Ly_. I can make allowance for you. But wait till I have prevailed on you

to give it a fair trial, to accept the judgement of your own eyes: after

that you will never be happy till you have secured the best seat in the

theatre, where you may hear every syllable, mark every gesture.

_Cr_. While this beard is yet unplucked, these limbs unshaven, God forbid

that I should ever find happiness in such things. As it is, my poor

friend, I see that _you_ are wholly possessed.

_Ly_. Now suppose you were to abstain from further abuse, and hear what I

have to say of the merits of Pantomime; of the manner in which it combines

profit with amusement; instructing, informing, perfecting the intelligence

of the beholder; training his eyes to lovely sights, filling his ears with

noble sounds, revealing a beauty in which body and soul alike have their

share. For that music and dancing are employed to produce these results is

no disparagement of the art; it is rather a recommendation.

_Cr_. I have not much time for listening to a madman's discourse in praise

of his own madness. However--if you must deluge me with nonsense--I am

prepared to do you that friendly office. My ears are at your service: they

need no wax to render them deaf to foolishness. Henceforth I will be

silent: speak on;--no one is listening.

_Ly._ Thank you, Crato; just what I wanted. As to 'foolishness,' that

remains to be seen. Now, to begin with, you seem to be quite ignorant of

the antiquity of the pantomimic art. It is not a new thing; it does not

date from to-day or yesterday; not, that is to say, from our grandfathers'

times, nor from _their_ grandfathers' times. The best antiquarians, let me

tell you, trace dancing back to the creation of the universe; it is coeval

with that Eros who was the beginning of all things. In the dance of the

heavenly bodies, in the complex involutions whereby the planets are

brought into harmonious intercourse with the fixed stars, you have an

example of that art in its infancy, which, by gradual development, by

continual improvements and additions, seems at length to have reached its

climax in the subtle harmonious versatility of modern Pantomime.

The first step, we learn, was taken by Rhea, who was so pleased with the

art that she introduced it among the Corybantes in Phrygia and the

Curetes in Crete. She was richly rewarded: for by their dancing they

saved her child Zeus, who owes it to them (nor can he with decency deny

it) that he escaped the paternal teeth. The dancing was performed in full

armour; sword clashed against shield, and inspired heels beat martial

time upon the ground. The art was presently taken up by the leading men

in Crete, who by dint of practice became admirable dancers; and this

applies not only to private persons, but to men of the first eminence,

and of royal blood. Thus Homer, when he calls Meriones a dancer, is not

disparaging him, but paying him a compliment: his dancing fame, it seems,

had spread not only throughout the Greek world, but even into the camp of

his enemies, the Trojans, who would observe, no doubt, on the field of

battle that agility and grace of movement which he had acquired as a

dancer. The passage runs as follows:

Meriones, great dancer though thou be,

My spear had stopped thy dancings,--

it did not, however, do so; his practice in that art enabling him,

apparently, to evade without difficulty any spears that might be hurled

at him.

I could mention a number of other heroes who went through a similar

course of training, and made a serious study of dancing: but I will

confine myself to the case of Neoptolemus, the son of Achilles, and a

most eminent dancer. He it was who invented that beautiful dance called

after him the Pyrrhic; a circumstance which may be supposed to have

afforded more gratification to his father than his comeliness, or his

prowess in other respects. Thus Troy, impregnable till then, falls a

victim to the dancer's skill, and is levelled with the dust.

The Lacedaemonians, who are reputed the bravest of the Greeks, ever since

they learnt from Castor and Pollux the Caryatic (a form of dance which is

taught in the Lacedaemonian town of Caryae), will do nothing without the

accompaniment of the Muses: on the field of battle their feet keep time

to the flute's measured notes, and those notes are the signal for their

onset. Music and rhythm ever led them on to victory. To this day you may

see their young men dividing their attention between dance and drill;

when wrestling and boxing are over, their exercise concludes with the

dance. A flute-player sits in their midst, beating time with his foot,

while they file past and perform their various movements in rhythmic

sequence, the military evolutions being followed by dances, such as

Dionysus and Aphrodite love. Hence the song they sing is an invitation to

Aphrodite and the Loves to join in their dance and revel; while the other

(I should have said that they have two songs) contains instructions to

the dancers: 'Forward, lads: foot it lightly: reel it bravely' (i.e.

dance actively). It is the same with the chain dance, which is performed

by men and girls together, dancing alternately, so as to suggest the

alternating beads of a necklace. A youth leads off the dance: his active

steps are such as will hereafter be of use to him on the field of battle:

a maiden follows, with the modest movements that befit her sex; manly

vigour, maidenly reserve,--these are the beads of the necklace.

Similarly, their Gymnopaedia is but another form of dance.

You have read your Homer; so that I need say nothing of the Shield of

Achilles, with its choral dance, modelled on that which Daedalus designed

for Ariadne; nor of the two dancers ('tumblers,' he calls them) there

represented as leading the dance; nor again of the 'whirling dance of

youth,' so beautifully wrought thereon by Hephaestus. As to the

Phaeacians, living as they did in the lap of luxury, nothing is more

natural than that _they_ should have rejoiced in the dance. Odysseus, we

find, is particularly struck with this: he gazes with admiration on the

'twinkling of their feet.' In Thessaly, again, dancing was such a

prominent feature, that their rulers and generals were called 'Dancers-in-

chief,' as may be seen from the inscriptions on the statues of their great

men: 'Elected Prime Dancer,' we read; and again: 'This statue was erected

at the public expense to commemorate Ilation's well-danced victory.'

I need hardly observe that among the ancient mysteries not one is to be

found that does not include dancing. Orpheus and Musaeus, the best

dancers of their time, were the founders of these rites; and their

ordinances show the value they attached to rhythm and dance as elements

in religion. To illustrate this point would be to make the ceremonial

known to the uninitiated: but so much is matter of common knowledge, that

persons who divulge the mysteries are popularly spoken of as 'dancing

them out.' In Delos, not even sacrifice could be offered without dance

and musical accompaniment. Choirs of boys gathered and performed their

dance to the sound of flute and lyre, and the best of them were chosen to

act characters; the songs written for these occasions were known as

chorales; and the ancient lyric poetry abounded in such compositions.

The Works of Lucian of Samosata — Volume 02 · 第 18 / 21 段