MODANE STATION

Travellers will find in the Refreshment Room (Buffet of the

Station) which is in direct communication with the Custom

Office, luncheon and dinner at the price of 3 frs., wine

included.

* * * * *

Porridge.

* * * * *

Slender at the Saint Germain.

Pike forced meat ball sauce of the financial

Beef to bake vegetables.

Poultry snow-drop of the Bresse at the

Jelly.

Salad of the time.

Side dish, chees and desert.

(½ bottle of wine.)

* * * * *

The prolonged stoppage of this train to Modane is long enough to

allow travellers to lunch and look over their baggage at the

Custom Office.

People when on a journey in old days were not very particular about

their food; indeed, too often thoroughly tired and worn out, they were

thankful to get anything to eat at all. Now pretty well every one who is

able to afford it is luxurious, and Spartan habits are at a discount.

Nevertheless there seem to be no noted gourmets to-day such as used to

exist in the past. Foremost amongst those, of course, was Abraham

Hayward, whose _Art of Dining_ is, I suppose, but little read at the

present time, when many of his gastronomic ideas would be considered

quite out of date. His contention, for instance, that the comparative

merits of pies and puddings present a problem difficult to decide, would

seem somewhat ridiculous to _bons vivants_ of the present day, when

puddings, formerly so popular, are, except in the sick-room, rarely

seen. Plum-pudding, of course, still maintains its ancient place. It may

not be generally known that it originated from plum-porridge, a first

course always served at Christmas in the seventeenth century. This was

prepared by boiling beef or mutton with a broth thickened by brown

bread, raisins, currants, cloves, nutmegs, ginger, and other condiments

being inserted when it was half-cooked.

The English are very contemptuous of many excellent things which their

country affords. Amongst these is the truffle, which, though perhaps not

equal in flavour to that of Périgord—called by Brillat Savarin the

diamond of the kitchen—is yet most delicious when properly cooked.

Besides this, owing to the small esteem in which it is held, its price

is exceedingly moderate, English truffles being purchasable in Covent

Garden Market at about one-eighth the price of the French variety. Years

ago, when staying at the Grange in Hampshire, I asked my host, the late

Lord Ashburton, whether he had ever thought of hunting for truffles in

his park, abounding as it did in beech trees, under which, in this

country, these esculents are found. He told me that he believed there

were plenty of truffles, but it was not worth the trouble of searching

for them, as no one cared for English truffles. I assured him that he

was wrong, for they were excellent; and, yielding to my entreaties, he

sent out orders for search to be made, and the next evening we had

English truffles for dinner, which were served merely as truffles,

without any announcement as to their nationality. Every one ate them,

and every one said they were delicious, and from that day to this the

English truffle, when in season, has continually been included in the

menu of the dinners served at the country house in question. Truffles

exist also at Goodwood and in Highclere Park—in fact, pretty well

everywhere where there are beech trees. The difficulty in obtaining them

seems to lie in the paucity of truffle-hunting dogs, which, of course,

have to be specially trained for their work. No doubt, were some easy

means discovered of finding truffles, their excellences would become

better known, and a home-grown delicacy, which is now almost overlooked,

would take its proper place in public appreciation.

Crayfish are excellent eating, as I believe the Germans realised when

they entered France in 1870. I was told that for years afterwards the

supply of _écrevisses_ was very limited indeed.

Many years ago, at a time when I was living in Sussex, I formed the idea

of attempting to acclimatise the crayfish in a little stream which

appeared suitable to their habits, and accordingly, after everything had

been prepared under expert direction, a consignment of _écrevisses_,

sent from France, were duly placed in a pool specially enclosed with

gratings, and furnished with everything that the most luxurious crayfish

could possibly desire. The experiment, however, proved totally

unsuccessful, for after a time not so much as even a morsel of shell was

to be found. Another consignment shared exactly the same fate, and Lord

Onslow, who made a similar experiment in acclimatisation, informed me

that his efforts, like mine, had also ended in disaster. For a long time

I was much puzzled as to what might have caused the death and also the

mysterious disappearance of any remains of these _écrevisses_, but am

now convinced that it was the result of raids by predatory water-rats,

the possibility of which we had left out of our calculations.

A rather curious thing in connection with gastronomy is that for the

last two hundred years the dinner hour in England has been getting later

and later.

In Addison’s time people dined at two o’clock, but gradually dinner was

put off and put off till four or five became the popular hour for dining

amongst the well-to-do classes. With the beginning of the nineteenth

century came a further postponement, and the dinner hour soon came to be

fixed at some time about seven o’clock; since which period further

encroachments upon the evening have taken place, and now half-past eight

is by no means an unusual hour.

The old English dinner which I remember in my childhood was, of course,

simplicity itself as compared with the elaborate banquets of to-day.

Nevertheless, a well-cooked English dinner, now almost unobtainable, was

not by any means a thing to be despised.

A small turbot, some well-roasted lamb or duckling, with green peas,

followed by a good apple or apricot tart, are, when well cooked, as Lord

Dudley used to say, a dinner for an emperor, and, in addition, far more

healthy than many a more costly and ambitious repast.

I well remember, as a child, my father sitting at the head of the table

and carving the joints himself, even when he gave a dinner-party. In

consequence of this we were in terror of asking for a second helping,

for even when only the family was present it was as much as he could do

to find time to eat his own dinner. The modern system is without doubt

much more convenient for everybody.

In the education of young ladies in England too little attention is as a

rule, I think, devoted to the inculcation of the principles of sound

housekeeping, and in consequence a good many mistresses of households

are quite ignorant of the important details of domestic management. Many

jokes, I remember, were current about one of this sort, a distinguished

matron of society, whom I may mention as Lady Caroline, a dear, portly

dame of high degree. Entering the married condition rather late in life

(despite a good average weight of some sixteen stone) as second wife to

a West-Country squire of limited estates, she undertook the management

of his household with a firm determination to conduct it on unswerving

principles of domestic economy. This truly admirable resolution was

unfortunately unenlightened by even a glimmer of elementary knowledge of

housekeeping, and her unsuccessful attempts at starting greatly

entertained her numerous friends. Her prompt dismissal of her first cook

in particular created much amusement. In vain had the poor woman, when

taxed with dishonesty, tried to persuade her mistress that only two legs

of mutton pertained to each sheep; for had not the lady, as she somewhat

angrily declared, all through her life seen them grazing with four!

In these days, however, there are so many admirable books published

which deal with household management and cookery in general, that little

excuse can be found for those who wilfully remain ignorant of the

essential amenities of existence.

I have a good collection of cookery books which I began to get together

at the time when the famous Soyer, who had been cook to Lady

Blessington, was creating quite a sensation in London. I remember being

taken to see him, and I also recollect his wife, who was a woman of

considerable artistic attainments, executing very pretty little sketches

in water-colour.

Both Soyer and his wife are buried, I believe, in a sort of mausoleum in

Kensal Green Cemetery, and on Soyer’s tomb is the very appropriate

inscription, “Soyer tranquil.”

Gentlemen used formerly to sit long in the dining-room over their wine,

of which they often drank a considerable quantity; but all this has now

been changed, and to-day they soon join the ladies, whose society they

very naturally prefer to the mineral waters in which so many of them

indulge instead of wine. People certainly seem to me to drink much less

nowadays, and of late years, I am informed, the consumption of wine at

dinner-parties has sunk to a very small quantity indeed, many men

drinking almost no wine at all. These would, I fancy, be bad days for

people like Abraham Hayward, who, when a friend of his remarked, “Why,

Hayward, I believe you could drink really any quantity of port, couldn’t

you?” is said to have replied, “Yes, my dear fellow, any _given_

quantity.” On the other hand, I believe that ladies who, up to

comparatively recent years, nearly all drank water, take a good deal

more wine, especially champagne, than was formerly the case.

The old custom of people asking one another to have a glass of wine at

dinner has long since died out. No doubt its disappearance is a good

thing, though there were occasions when it distinctly conduced to

pleasant sociability. A shy man, for instance, at a dinner-party of

strangers was soon put at his ease by kindly intimations that Mr.

So-and-so would like to take a glass of wine with him. Not a few,

however, carried the old custom too far, and, besides this, a set could

be so easily made against any especial individual whom mischievous

schemers might wish to exhilarate unduly.

Cigarette-smoking after dinner has undoubtedly been a great factor in

the cause of temperance. In old days such a thing would have been

regarded with horror; indeed, I think the greatest minor change in

social habits which I have witnessed is that in the attitude assumed

towards tobacco-smoking, which in my youth, and even later, was, except

in certain well-defined circumstances, regarded as little less than a

heinous crime.

Smoking-rooms in country houses were absolutely unknown, and such

gentlemen as wished to smoke after the ladies had gone to bed used, as a

matter of course, to go either to the servants’ hall or to the

harness-room in the stables, where at night some sort of rough

preparation was generally made for their accommodation. To smoke in Hyde

Park, even up to comparatively recent years, was looked upon as

absolutely unpardonable, while smoking anywhere with a lady would have

been classed as an almost disgraceful social crime.

The first gentleman of whom I heard as having been seen smoking a cigar

in the Park was the late Duke of Sutherland, and the lady who told me

spoke of it as if she had been present at an earthquake!

Well do I remember the immense care which devotees of tobacco used to

take, when sallying forth in the country to enjoy it, not to allow the

faintest whiff of smoke to penetrate into the hall as they lit their

cigars at the door. The whole thing was really ridiculous, but I suppose

it would have still been going on had it not been for our present King,

who most sensibly took the lead in promoting the toleration of what is,

after all, a great addition to the pleasures of life.

Besides this, there can be no doubt that the cigarette-smoking now

practically universally prevalent after lunch and dinner has been a

considerable factor in the direction of temperance, and has ended the

practice of consuming large quantities of wine, which in old days was

more or less universal. On the whole, I believe that smoking does more

good than harm, in spite of the attacks sometimes levelled against it.

Cigarettes, of course, are a modern invention, but I believe they

already existed in a slightly different form at the beginning of the

nineteenth century, when old Peninsular officers used to smoke tobacco

rolled up tight in a piece of paper. They called this a _papelito_, and

I fancy it was much the same thing as a cigarette. The exact time when

cigars were introduced into England seems very uncertain. In _Westward

Ho!_ Charles Kingsley pictures Amyas Leigh smoking a cigar, and it is to

be presumed that he had authority for this. At the same time it is quite

clear that cigars were hardly known in England at all as late as 1730,

for the writer of a book published about that time, when describing the

adventures of certain English sailors taken prisoners by a Spanish

pirate in South America, notes with special astonishment that the

captives were presented with “segars,” of which he gives a detailed

description.

The greatest traditionary smoker is, of course, Dr. Parr, whose motto is

said to have been, “No pipe—no Parr.” He is also declared to have once

very wittily told a lady, who had triumphantly prevented him from

indulging in his beloved tobacco, that “she was the greatest tobacco

stopper in England.”

Leaves from the Note-Books of Lady Dorothy Nevill · 第 36 / 57 题