CHAPTER XII.

POMPEII--A CAMEO--SKETCH FOR THE BACCO DELLA

CRITTOGAMA--PROFESSOR ANGELINI THE SCULPTOR--ONE MUST NOT OFFER

ONE'S HAND WITH TOO MUCH FREEDOM TO LADIES--A HARD-HEARTED

WOMAN WITH SMALL INTELLIGENCE--THE SAN CARLO, THE SAN CARLINO,

THE FENICE, AND THE SEBETO--MONUMENT BY DONATELLO AT

NAPLES--THE BAROCCO AND MISTAKEN OPINIONS--DILETTANTI IN THE

FINE ARTS--PRINCE DON SEBASTIAN OF BOURBON--IS THE BEARD A SIGN

OF BEING LEGITIMIST OR LIBERAL?--I AM TAKEN FOR A PRINCE OR

SOMETHING LIKE ONE--"THE BOTTLE" FOR DOORKEEPERS AND CUSTODI OF

THE PUBLIC MUSEUMS OF NAPLES--PHIDIAS, DEMOSTHENES, AND CICERO

ALL AGAINST RUGGERO BONGHI.

I summoned up all my little stock of patience, and moved slowly towards

the door, they following me. Thanking the gentlemen, I shut them out,

and returned in silence to my work. This happened some thirty years ago,

nor as yet does it seem as if the prophecy about that young man were

realised.

To return to ourselves. "Appetite comes with eating," as the proverb has

it; and in fact, by degrees, as I visited the museums, the churches, and

the studios of the Neapolitan artists, I felt an increasing desire to do

something, to try again to draw or to model, were it but a mere trifle.

One day, after having gone over the whole breadth and length of the

excavations at Pompeii, I was examining a mosaic pavement made out of a

great many pretty little coloured stones, some of them broken away from

their place; and bending down to examine it closer, I touched one of the

stones. The _custode_ hastened to say to me, "Don't touch, signor--the

regulations prohibit it." It cannot be denied that I have always been

disposed to respect all regulations; but since I had seen them broken,

even by those who ought to have been the first to respect them, I had

taken them in dudgeon. I looked at the _custode_, and he at me, and we

understood each other at once. I took a turn, went to the door, looked

to the right and to the left of me, and coming back, as I was taking

something out of my pocket I dropped some money on the ground.

[Sidenote: A LITTLE CAMEO-HEAD.]

My friend picked it up for me, and I gave him a _carlino_. We returned

to the room where the mosaic pavement was. It represented a race of

animals, hares and dogs, on a yellow ground. Some of the little stones

were loose, and already many were missing; they were small squares about

as large as my little-finger nail. I bent down again, and stretched out

my hand, looking at the guard, who for decency's sake turned in the

other direction; and I took the little stone, on which, with a great

deal of patience and increasing gusto, I drew and engraved a small head

after the fashion of a cameo, roughing it out at first with the point of

a penknife, and finishing it off with sharpened needles fastened into

little handles, which I used in the place of small chisels and burins. I

always keep this little head, which was set in gold as a pin, and

sometimes wear it in my necktie. When I look at this small piece of

workmanship, I am astonished at my patience and my eyesight at that

time.

To tell the truth, when I picked up that little stone I had no idea of

working on it, but merely took it as a remembrance of the day and the

place. In touching it, I thought that it had been shaped and put there

by a man like myself, two thousand years ago. In holding that little

square stone between my fingers, it seemed to me as if my hand touched

the hand of that man, who then was full of life. I thought of his scant

dust, now dispersed, transformed but not lost! Where is this dust now?

I, where was I then? While I was thinking on this, my good Marina

approached, and said--

"Do you find any beauty in that little stone?"

[Sidenote: VESUVIUS AND ITS LAVA.]

"No. I was thinking that it is very old. I was thinking that it is a

fusion of fire, and in substance lava. But was not Vesuvius unknown at

the time that this city was constructed? Could you imagine that they

would have been so insane as to have built on the outskirts of a

mountain vomiting fire? Have you not observed that in all the many

paintings on these houses, where you find over and over again

landscapes, sea views, animals, figures, in fact everything, that there

is never the slightest trace of a view of Vesuvius? If it had been

there, surely they would not have failed to reproduce in painting such a

marvellous phenomenon. Therefore it could not have been there; and yet

all these mosaics are made of lava, and all the surrounding country at a

certain distance below the surface of the ground is covered with it. It

was not there, I say, in their memory; but when was it there?"

"Do you know?" said my wife.

"I?--no, indeed."

"Then you can imagine if I do."

After this small cameo, I wished to model a little figure in bas-relief,

which it was my intention to have executed on a shell cameo, and I gave

the order for it; but the workmen employed for this kind of work are so

unintelligent that if you take them away from the work they are

accustomed to do almost mechanically, they are not able to succeed in

doing anything. The little figure represented Medicine. She was seated

on a stool, and with a little stick was pushing aside the bushes to look

for some medicinal plants; but in doing so a serpent had wound itself

around her stick, as it is said to have happened to Æsculapius. Behind

the stone on which she is seated flows a little stream of water, to

denote the salutary action of water by which I was cured, and to which

she turns her back.

[Sidenote: NEW SKETCH OF THE BACCHUS.]

I also made a new sketch for the Bacchino della Crittogama, which was

the one that I afterwards made of life-size on my return from Naples.

The one I had left behind me in clay was very different, and I destroyed

it. I had this new sketch baked, and I remember one day when I went to

get it from the man who sells _terre cotte_, near Santa Lucia, to whom I

had given it to bake, that I found him arguing with a stranger who had

taken it absolutely into his head to buy it. It was useless for the man

to say that the statuette did not belong to him; that he could not sell

it; that it was not finished; and that his little figures of Apollo, the

Idolino, Venus, and Flora were far better and more finished than this

sketch: he only kept repeating, "I like this, and want to buy it;" and

all persuasion was useless. I put an end to the discussion in two words,

saying to the man--

"Sell it to him."

"How much must I ask?"

"A thousand _lire_."

At which the good _touriste_ immediately put down the Bacchino, and went

away in peace. Some two months after this I presented this little sketch

to a priest from Verona, whose name I do not remember, but who came to

preach the Lenten sermons at our cathedral in Florence. I regret to

have given it to him, for it is always well that a man's sketches should

remain in his family, and also because, for all his eloquence, he has

never since reported himself to me. Can he really be dead? _Requiem

æternam._

[Sidenote: VISIT TO CAVALIERE ANGELINI.]

In this manner the time passed by, alternating the long walks in the

neighbourhood of Naples with a little work and some artistic visits to

Mancinelli, to Balzico (then but a young student), to Smargiassi the

landscape-painter, and to Gigante, the famous water-colourist. I did not

fail to try to find the sculptor Cavaliere Angelini, whom I had already

known in Florence; but for some inexplicable reason I could not see him,

and this was what happened. I went to his studio, and his men told me

that he had gone to the Academy to lecture to the young men. I went to

the Academy, and was told that he desired me to wait, because he was

giving his lessons. I waited a good long time, and when he came out he

said that he was in such a hurry he could not pay any attention to me

then, but that I must come to his studio on a certain day at a certain

hour. I went there and knocked; no one answered, and the soldier who was

mounting guard at the Serraglio dei Poveri close by said that every one

had gone away more than two hours before. It seemed to me a little

strange, after having named the day and hour; but more or less

forgetfulness in an artist means nothing--in fact it is a sort of sauce

or dressing to an artist's character, be he young or full-grown, on

horseback or on foot. Dear me! such things are easily understood; and if

I had not been a little tired, I should not even have thought of it, and

would have returned another day. But when, and at what time? Should I

have ever found the door open?

My hotel was very far from the poorhouse, but the two places were not

very dissimilar; for although all my expenses were paid by the Grand

Duke, it had not yet become the fashion to squander and waste after the

ways of to-day; and be it from education, temperament, or other motives,

I felt it my duty to economise for that good gentleman's purse even more

than for my own, and therefore my inn could really be called a poorhouse

in spite of its pompous name, for it was a third-class hotel; but the

distance was great, and, to mortify the Professor a little, I wrote on

his studio door--"_G. Duprè at home on such a day and such an hour._"

[Sidenote: PROFESSOR ANGELINI.]

He will come, he will certainly come, to see me at my inn to make his

excuses. Poor Angelini! he is certainly absent-minded, and am I not also

absent-minded? He will come to find me out. Yes; I stayed in Naples six

months, and never saw him. Something beyond absent-mindedness, I think;

but so it was. I told all this for amusement to his colleagues, but they

took it seriously to heart,--so much so, that at one of their academic

meetings they proposed me as an Associate-Professor: and Angelini seemed

delighted, and warmly supported my nomination, so that naturally it was

passed; but I never went into his studio. Oh no.

Yes; I repeat it ten, twenty times over. My dear colleague, this

happened in the month of January 1853; see what a good memory I have.

You, it is quite natural, have forgotten it, because he who is guilty of

such things does not take heed of them, neither should the person to

whom they are done, unless he be as black as Loredan, who wrote down the

death of the two Foscari in his book of Debit and Credit. Therefore let

it be understood, that I did not take note of it, and don't remember it;

but if you ever take it into your head to return to Florence, and,

passing casually through the Via della Sapienza, you would like to rest

a little in my studio, you can do so; and the best of it is, that I do

not name the day or the hour, only take this journey and make this visit

soon, for we are now both old, and I shall not return to you, for I am

afraid of finding the door shut!

Here I come to the moral. I speak of artists. The desire to see the

works and also become acquainted personally with contemporary artists is

a good sign; it indicates a spirit of emulation, a wish to learn, and

form bonds of friendship, so to discuss and bring to light errors and

doubts on questions of art. But if the artist with whom you desire to

speak names a certain day and hour, then answer at once, "Thank you very

much, but I cannot come." Tell him this untruth--it will be but a small

sin; whereas he who imposes upon you a day and hour gives himself so

much importance that he resembles that ugly and haughty signor called

_Pride_.

[Sidenote: SHAKING HANDS.]

There are some medicines so proper and efficacious, that once you have

taken them, you are radically cured, and for good. Angelini cured me of

the wish to knock at studio doors; and the Signora Marchesini cured me

of another habit, formed either by custom or stupidity, of shaking hands

with everybody, especially with women. The Signora Marchesini was at

that time (I am speaking of about thirty years ago) an aristocratic lady

of a certain age--one of those persons who, without even taking the

trouble to turn to look at any one who came to see her, would answer the

salutation and bow prescribed by good breeding with an _addio_ and a

"good evening" when one took leave, were it even at midnight. Such was

the Signora Marchesini.

[Sidenote: EMBRACING FRIENDS.]

One night I went into her box at the Pergola, and going up to her I

bowed and put out my hand. Ass that I was! I did not know that this act

of familiarity was not allowed to _inferiors_; and putting aside

nobility of birth, I was her junior by thirty years, and perhaps this

offended the austere lady more than anything else. The lesson, however,

was a good one; and from that day, in fact from that evening, I have

never since been the first to offer my hand to any woman, old or young.

All this nonsense reminds me of a much rougher and more vulgar instance

of haughtiness, from which my beloved wife was the sufferer. She was as

simple and good, poor darling, as the woman who offended her was hard

and proud.

I had gone to pay a visit to a friend of mine, a gentleman of noble

birth, education, and tact, with whom I had friendly relations. My wife

was with me, and he was in the drawing-room with his, who was French by

birth, much younger than himself, and whom he had lately married. As

soon as my friend saw me he spread out his arms, and we embraced each

other; my wife, with a feeling of spontaneous tenderness, pressed

forward to embrace the young lady, but she drew back, perhaps not

thinking it beseeming or according to etiquette to embrace a woman the

first time she saw her, even although she was much older than herself.

My poor Marina, with her purity of soul, did not feel offended, but

turning to me she timidly asked, "Have I done wrong?"

"You! no, my dear; but another time stand on your own ground. That woman

did not deserve to be embraced by you."

My friend took no notice of anything, and shortly after we left the

house. I do not know why, but this remembrance goads me more and more

every day; it stimulates my love for her who now smiles at all these

miseries--she who was so worthy of all honours, who desired and was able

to keep herself always good, mild, and compassionate--a good wife, a

good mother, truly a lady by her virtues, and not by reason of her birth

and riches. More I should like to say, but cannot; I look with anxious

love for the words that fail me, and I think that the innermost

lineaments of that temperate, strong, patient soul can be felt but

cannot be portrayed.

[Sidenote: AMUSEMENTS AT NAPLES.]

I continued to get better and better in Naples. The medical man insisted

that I should walk a great deal and take simple and abundant food--a

little soup, roastbeef, and a plate of vegetables, and nothing else, for

dinner; for breakfast, after my bath and walk, a glass of cold milk and

some bread. As a distraction for my mind, he recommended my seeing and

talking with people I liked, and going to the theatre of an evening. At

first the theatre bored me; I did not understand those little _bouffe_

comedies in dialect at the Fenice and San Carlino, and all those

repartees of Punchinello irritated me. It was bad for me to go to the

San Carlo, where they were giving the 'Trovatore' with the Penco,

Fraschini, and the Borghi-mamo, and 'Othello' with the Pancani, for they

made me weep, not on account of the dramas themselves, which I already

knew, but on account of the music, which had such a strong effect on my

nerves. For these reasons I was obliged to give up the music at San

Carlo, and 'Punch' at San Carlino and the Fenice, and took refuge in the

Sebeto, a very small theatre, where for the most part were represented

dramas in bad taste, artistically speaking, but not as far as morals are

concerned--exaggerated characters, forced situations to create

immoderate effects, &c.,--in fact, dramas of the Federici stamp, to

touch the hearts of the populace, but not calculated to influence them

with voluptuousness, the more dangerous when veiled in the attractive,

graceful, and polished forms of cunning sophistry. Then these dramas

were not in dialect, and 'Punch' only came in at the farce, and for such

a very small part that I could bear him, and little by little began to

understand and appreciate him. As I have already said, the theatre was a

necessity for me, and it entered into my _sage's_ system of treatment;

but he added that I was not to take the recreation by myself, but in the

company of my wife and child, and with as much ease as possible, so that

it was necessary to take a small box, which, as the theatre was so small

and unpretending, was not a very great expense. Perhaps the idea of

economy never once occurred to the generous sovereign who came to my

aid, but I used to think of it, as I have before said.

[Sidenote: CHURCHES AT NAPLES.]

Thus, with so much to divert my mind, during the day going to see the

public monuments and the churches in which this immense city is so rich,

and at evening to the theatre, my recovery was completed. Nor were there

wanting splendid works of art, besides the collection of ancient

bronzes, unique in the world, and wonderfully useful to the students of

sculpture. The Church of San Gennaro, with its monuments, amongst which

are those of Carlo d'Angio, Carlo Martello, and Clemenza his wife; San

Paolo, built on the ruins of the Roman theatre where Nero used to appear

in public and declaim his verses, and where Metronate gave his lessons

in philosophy, which were attended by Seneca as his pupil (what a lesson

to young men!); Santa Chiara, with its monuments to the ancient kings of

Naples, which once was all frescoed over by Giotto, and has been most

barbarously whitewashed by Berio Nuovo; Sant'Angelo a Nilo, with that

splendid monument to Cardinal Brancaccio, one of Donatello's finest

works; and San Domenico Maggiore,--all these monuments, as much for

their beauty as for the historical records they contain, are worthy of

the greatest attention and study, and are calculated to inspire ideas

and a desire to work.

[Sidenote: INDIFFERENCE TO WHAT IS NEAR US.]

But often it happens that the most valuable things one has, so to speak,

at one's very door, are not thought anything of--not even noticed; and

such was the case then with some artists in Naples, who either did not

remember or were not acquainted with their own artistic treasures. I

remember a young sculptor who often lamented that Naples was wanting in

art of the middle ages. I reminded him of the monuments above mentioned,

dwelling especially on that by Donatello, to which he answered that he

did not know it. "Go to see it," I said; "it is unpardonable in you not

to know it."

After some time I saw the youth, and said to him--

"Well, did you see the monument by Donatello, and what did you think of

it?" to which he answered, "I found that I had already seen it once

before, but did not remember it."

"Then," thought I to myself, "there is an end of all hope for you."

[Sidenote: CICERONI AND THEIR IDEAS.]

It is certainly a most painful fact that some of the finest works of our

elders are either entirely ignored or not cared for, but it is most sad

when this indifference comes from young men who have dedicated

themselves to art. That the usual ignorant _ciceroni_ who show strangers

the sepulchral chapel of the Princes of Sangro take no notice of the

monument by Donatello is natural enough, but it is none the less

disgusting to hear them pouring forth their opinions after the following

fashion: "See, gentlemen, these statues are the stupendous work of the

famous Venetian Antonio Corradini. Observe the two statues that stand in

the arch by the columns of the high altar; they are miracles of

sculpture; one is by Corradini, and one by Quieroli. The first

represents the mother of the Prince Don Raimondo, who restored and

enriched this chapel--which was founded by the Prince Don Francesco in

1590--with precious marble. The statue represents Modesty--one of the

principal virtues that distinguished the Princess. See, gentlemen, she

is enveloped in a transparent veil, beneath which is revealed the whole

of her figure: this is a method of sculpture unknown even to the Greeks,

for the ancients only painted their draperies, but did not cut them in

marble. The other prodigy of art is a statue representing the father of

the Prince himself as 'Disinganno.' In this statue behold a man caught

in a net; you see all the meshes of the net, and inside it the body

itself." The stranger, meantime, stands there open-mouthed, admiring

these statues, in which, to tell the truth, one could not too deeply

deplore the time and patience that have been wasted on work whose only

object is to arrest the attention of vulgar people, who take all these

material and mechanical difficulties for the essential and only aim in

art. All this, I repeat, is disgusting if you like, and rather

ridiculous; but the people of the country, and most particularly

artists, ought to laugh at such works as these, as well as their

admirers. This mania for the difficult and surprising, to the detriment

of beauty itself, which is so simple, has carried corruption into art

itself as well as to its amateurs--so much so, that dresses of rich

stuffs, embroideries, laces, and like trifles, which need but a little

patience and practice to produce, have to-day become so much in vogue as

to really make one fear that art is in danger, and that research and

study to reproduce the beautiful will be replaced by work of a sort of

asinine patience, which surprises and impresses only simple-minded,

vulgar people, and dilettanti. And _àpropos_ of dilettanti, I wish to

express my opinion that although they may take pleasure in painting and

sculpture they are not of the slightest use to these arts. Dilettanti

are generally gentlemen--fine gentlemen, sometimes even princes--and in

consequence of their station and wealth, are surrounded by a cloud of

small-minded people, who, owing to the respect and deference they feel

for them, are induced to praise them. This cheap praise, which is taken

so unceremoniously, engenders in those who give it a false and

sophistical tone, with which they quiet their consciences, ever

muttering, "You ought not to have said this; it is not just--it is not

true." As this internal grumbling is irksome, the mind builds up a sort

of reasoning that holds out as long as it can, and then falls for want

of that solid foundation, Truth, that alone can uphold any structure, be

it scientific, artistic, or literary. With him who receives the praise,

matters go far more easily; he does not give it another thought, or if

he does, it is from excess of vanity that he sniffs the remaining odour

from that small cloud of incense.

[Sidenote: CHEAP PRAISE.]

[Sidenote: A DILETTANTI PRINCE.]

In Naples there were two of these dilettanti princes,--one a painter,

the other a sculptor. His Royal Highness Don Sebastian, Prince of

Bourbon, brother-in-law of the King of Naples, was the painter, and His

Royal Highness Count of Syracuse, brother of the same king, was the

sculptor. The last named died a little after the revolution in 1860, and

of his artistic merits I have already spoken. I shall therefore now say

two words about his Highness Don Sebastian. I had the honour of being

presented to him by the Grand Duke Leopold, who was at that time in

Naples with his daughter the Princess Isabella, married to Count

Trapani, who was expecting to be confined. Having been some time in

Naples myself, I went to pay my homage to him, and he then made me

acquainted with his Highness Don Sebastian, who was without pretensions,

a simple, modest man. He asked for advice, and he asked for it with such

eagerness and persistency that it showed a desire to know the absolute

truth, that he might correct himself--and not truth disguised under a

veil of complimentary praise, which only misleads. And I, with the

mildest words that I could find in the vocabulary of truth, gave him

briefly and generally some advice; for his wish to do something really

good was above his school and the studies he had followed. Although, as

I have said, he had a sincere desire to hear the truth, yet I became

aware that the language I used was quite new to him. I can add, however,

that he did not feel hurt by it, as he often wished to see me and hear

me, and corrected himself or tried to do so in many things, thus

indicating confidence and goodwill. At this time he was painting a large

picture for an altar, which he presented to the church of San Giacomo

degli Spagnuoli, above Toledo, and I remember that he gave me a drawing

of it. He had taken refuge in Naples with the king his brother-in-law,

owing to the part he had taken as a Legitimist against the government of

Queen Isabella, who had confiscated all his revenues; and he mitigated

the bitterness of exile and poverty by his devoted love for art. After

some time he was restored to his country, and reinstated in his

property, so that at last he must have comforted himself with his own

bread, having known how salt was that of exile. He returned to his

country, and who knows if he did not cut off his beard, which he used to

wear full and long, after the fashion of Spanish Legitimists? Strange to

say, in Italy at that time, especially in Naples, a beard was the sign

of just the contrary--that is to say, of a Liberal; and the annoyances

caused by the police on this account were so ridiculous as to be quite

disgusting. One was obliged, however, to conform to all this, for if a

young man desired not to be exposed to worse annoyances, he was obliged

to shave his chin. He might keep his moustache and whiskers after the

German fashion, or wear his whiskers alone like the English--he was

quite free to do that; but a beard on his chin, be it long or short,

indicated Liberalism: and as I have said, he was immediately marked by

the agents of Del Carretto, Minister of Police, and, willing or no, was

obliged to shave to avoid something worse. At that time, therefore, the

manliness of a Neapolitan showed itself everywhere but on his chin. In

all Naples--with the rare exception of some foreigner, the Prince Don

Sebastian, who was anything but a Liberal, the Count of Syracuse, and

Count of Aquila, brothers of the king, whom the police hounds could

growl at but not bite--not for a million of money could a beard be seen,

unless it were mine, which, although not so luxuriant as it is now, was

still more than enough for the police.

[Sidenote: BEARDS IN NAPLES.]

During the days that the Grand Duke remained in Naples, he desired to

see the museums and other monuments of this great city, and wished me to

accompany him, out of simple kindness, for his Highness acted as my

guide, being much better acquainted with them than I was. This driving

up and down the streets of Naples in a Court carriage, with a full

beard on my face, upset all the ideas of those poor _sbirri_. Some

people took me for a Spanish Legitimist; and others--especially the

sentinels at the palace--christened me at once a relation of the royal

family,--so much so, that they presented arms to me every time I passed

by. Must I admit that I took pleasure in this, returning their salute

and passing before them as if I had been a true prince? "_Viva_ my

beard!" said I to myself; "but see how things are going in this country!

Some people are sent almost to the gallows for wearing a beard, and to

me they are presenting arms." One evening, however, even I came very near

being sent to prison. I was walking in the Strada Toledo, and about to

return home. Near the turning of the _Orefici_ by the Palazzo dei

Ministeri, there was a print-shop lighted by a reflected lamp, that

threw a light upon it as brilliant as day. There were some French

engravings, such as the Death of Richelieu, the Death of the Duke de

Guise, and I know not what else. I felt a hand on my shoulder; turning

round I saw some one gazing attentively at me, and before I had time to

ask him what he wanted, some one else took the man by the arm and said,

"Don't occupy yourself with him; he is one of the royal household;" and

away they went in the crowd, and I saw them no more.

[Sidenote: I PASS FOR A PRINCE.]

[Sidenote: LA BOTTIGLIA.]

I hurried home, for fear of finding others who might not share the same

opinion. My wife and little one were waiting for me to go to the

theatre, and I remember that they were then giving 'Edmondo Dante, Count

of Monte Cristo,' a monstrous production which lasted twelve

hours--divided, however, into three evenings. My little box was on the

first tier near the orchestra,--and such an orchestra! Two violins, one

double-bass, a clarionet, and a flute, the music being pieces adapted

from the 'Trovatore'; and such an adaptation! Good heavens! All this

cost me--that is to say, cost the Grand Duke--four _carlini_, including

"the bottle," for in Naples one must always pay for "the bottle" to

every one. Really in that fortunate country one required to have a

_carlino_ always in hand. I don't know how it is now, but then every one

was constantly drinking. Ushers, inspectors, _custodi_--all asked for

"this bottle" with the utmost frankness and in perfect seriousness. I,

who went often to the museum, wished to have my cane to lean on, as

there were no chairs to sit down on; but "No, sir,"--the porter, with

his great cocked-hat, came and took it away, having the right to do so,

as it was against the regulations. When I left he gave it back to me,

always saying, "Your Excellency, the bottle," pronouncing these words

with such dignity that you would have thought they were part of the

royal regulations; and I used to give it--that is to say, a

half-_carlino_ at every section. Pompeian paintings, statues and

bronzes, Etruscan vases, Renaissance paintings and drawings--each had a

_custode_, and all wanted a drink. Perhaps now they are no longer

thirsty, which will be all the better for the poor visitor. I paid these

half-bottles, or rather half-_carlini_, most unwillingly, for to be

always paying out is in itself most tiresome; and I was more out of

temper than really tired, not being able to find a seat anywhere. One

day a painter who was copying there was moved to pity, and offered me

his stool. It is not unnatural that a man who was both poor and unwell,

should be unwilling to pay out money in gratuities, and should look upon

that given to the porter as the hardest part of all, as it was to pay

him merely for taking away the stick he had to lean on. The consequence

was, that not being able to bear this _lucro cessante_ and _danno

emergente_, as they say in law, I made bold to say to this high

personage (he was at least a palm taller than I), "Listen, signor; I

will no longer give you the bottle."

[Sidenote: FEES FOR ADMISSION TO THE GALLERIES.]

"Why not, Excellency?"

"Because you take away my stick, which would be a comfort for me to lean

on."

"Well, well," he answered, "keep your stick, Excellency; but remember

the bottle."

"I understand, I quite understand--and add a little more to it."

And the eyes of that Argus brightened, although he was by way of

shutting them as far as the regulations were concerned. The necessity

for drinking, it seems, belongs to this people, and it must be on

account of the hot air they breathe, all impregnated with the salt from

the sea. Therefore I fancy this desire of theirs has not yet been

allayed, for even I drank a great deal when I was there, only it was

water, which is so good, so fresh, so light, that it is a pleasure to

drink; but alas! so many prefer "the bottle." If, however, even against

the natural order of the country, this has been suppressed amongst the

subalterns, it has been adopted by the heads themselves, as the Minister

of Public Instruction has decreed an entrance-tax for every one who

wishes to see in our galleries the works of Raphael, Michael Angelo, or

our other glorious fathers, who in their simplicity certainly never

thought of being obliged to show themselves at so much a head like some

wild beasts.

[Sidenote: ADMISSION FEES TO THE PUBLIC GALLERIES.]

It is a curious thing (which induces me to think that thirst must be in

the air of Naples) that this bottle-tax was instituted by a Neapolitan,

the Honourable Ruggero Bonghi, who, be it said with all due respect,

seems to be less anxious for the decorum of art and the advantage of

artists than for an economy which, to say the truth, is but a shabby

one. I know quite well that artists are free from this tax, but they

must be provided with a certificate, which is always a restriction; and

it is also true that artists, and those who are not artists, can enjoy

free entrance, but only on _festa_ days. It comes to the same as if to

one who said, "I am hungry," you answered, "You shall eat next week." Is

it believed that only those students who are provided with certificates

are to become artists? Art learns more from example than from precept,

as it is with every other thing. I should be curious to know if

Demosthenes and Cicero lived before or after the Treatise on Eloquence,

or if Phidias studied at the Academy, and paid a tax for admission.

Then, also, this is the common property of all, and therefore its

advantages should not be restricted. The answer is, that the

entrance-tax is used for the maintenance and decorum of the galleries

themselves. The decorum and support of the public galleries never

suffered from the want of this in bygone days; why should they feel the

need of it to-day?

Thoughts on Art and Autobiographical Memoirs of Giovanni Duprè · 第 12 / 23 章