SKULL

_Dorsal Aspect_ (Figs. 1, 2)

In reconstruction, the skull measures approximately 8.0 mm.

dorsoventrally at the posterior end. The height diminishes anteriorly

to about 1.5 mm. at the premaxillary. The length is about 15.5 mm. in

the median line, or 24.0 mm. to the tip of the tabular, and the width

about 16.0 mm. posteriorly. The snout is blunt, continuing about 1-2

mm. anterior to the external nares. Each of the tabulars has a slender

posterior process 5.0 mm. long, which probably met the supracleithrum;

the intertabular space is about 8.5 mm. wide. The orbits are

approximately 5.5 mm. in diameter and extend from the maxillary to

within about 3.0 mm. of the midline dorsally. The pineal opening is 1.8

mm. anterior to the occipital margin of the skull.

Reduction of bones at the back of the skull seems to have eliminated

any dermal elements posterior to the squamosal, while enlargement of

the orbit has removed most of the postorbital series, leaving the

squamosal as the only cheekbone. There is apparently no jugal or

postfrontal.

The squamosal of _Acanthostega_ (Jarvik, 1952) is articulated under the

tabular and reaches forward and down, much as if it were an opercular

in reversed position. Internally, it must lie against the otic capsule

below the tabular, partially concealing the stapes. The bone that we

suppose to be the squamosal of _H. garnettense_ is of similar shape, of

about the same size and has internally an articular surface at one

corner, bounded by a pair of ridges in the shape of a V. This articular

surface probably fitted on a lateral process extending from the roof of

the neurocranium, over the front of the otic capsule.

The premaxillary extends posterolaterally to a distance 5.5 mm. from

the midline and attains a width at its broadest point of about 1.5 mm.

The posterior edge is slightly concave and in part forms the anterior

border of the naris.

[Illustration: FIG. 1. _Hesperoherpeton garnettense_ Peabody. Skull,

dorsal view. Postorbital processes of the neurocranium are shown in

dotted outline. KU 10295, x 4.]

The nasal is triangular and, with the lacrimal, forms the medial border

of the naris. The length of the medial side of the nasal bone is

approximately 5.0 mm., the transverse width is 3.8 mm., and the extent

of the posterolateral border is 5.5 mm.

The maxillary meets the premaxillary lateral to the naris, borders the

naris posteroventrally, and continues posteriorly beneath the orbit, of

which it forms the external border. The maxillary is about 8.5 mm.

long, and immediately anterior to the orbit has a maximum width of 1.3

mm.

The lacrimal fills the remaining rim of the narial opening between the

nasal and maxillary, and extends to the anterior edge of the orbit. The

length, from naris to orbit, is 4.2 mm.; the width ranges from 1.0 mm.

anteriorly to 2.5 mm. posteriorly.

[Illustration: FIG. 2. _Hesperoherpeton garnettense_ Peabody. Skull,

lateral view, showing relatively large orbit and absence of smaller

circumorbital bones. KU 10295, x 4.]

The external naris is approximately 1.0 mm. in diameter. It is slightly

anterodorsal to the internal naris and 4.0 mm. lateral to the midline.

The dorsal margin of the orbit appears to be formed by the frontal. The

anterior part of this margin, however, may be formed by a prefrontal,

which is not clearly set off by a suture. The frontal extends 3.8 mm.

in the midline, and anteriorly and laterally borders the nasal and

lacrimal, respectively. A faint pattern of pitting radiates on the

surface from the center of ossification of the frontal. There is also a

pit indicating the presence of a supraorbital sensory pore.

The parietal bones enclose the pineal opening, approximately 2.5 mm.

posterior to the suture with the frontal. The foramen is about 0.5 mm.

in diameter. Laterally the parietal meets the medial angle of the

postorbital and the medial border of the supratemporal. No bone of this

animal shows the deep pitting and heavy ornamentation characteristic of

many primitive Amphibia.

The postorbital meets the anterolateral corner of the parietal for a

distance of 0.5 mm., the anterior edge bordering the frontal bone and

the orbit for a combined distance of about 3.0 mm. The lateral margin

is slightly convex, and is probably interrupted behind by the anterior

point of the tabular. Medially, the concave margin of the postorbital

meets the supratemporal for about 3.5 mm.

The supratemporal is thus wedge-shaped and located between the parietal

and the postorbital. The posterior edge of the supratemporal protrudes

as a convex border slightly behind the end of the parietal, and

measures 3.0 mm. around the curve to the parietal suture.

[Illustration: FIG. 3. _Hesperoherpeton garnettense_ Peabody. A, left

squamosal, internal surface. B, left squamosal, external surface. C,

right tabular internal surface. D, right tabular, external surface. KU

10295, all x 4.]

The squamosal (Fig. 3 A, B) is a large, somewhat rectangular bone

extending from the back of the orbit to the posterior extremity of the

cheek. It outlines almost entirely the posterior border of the orbit,

the ventrolateral portion of the cheek region, and the lateral border

of the top of the skull behind the orbit. Dorsally, the squamosal meets

the anterior half of the tabular and the lateral border of the

supratemporal. Near the anteroventral edge of the squamosal there is a

small pit, probably related to a postorbital sensory pore in the skin.

The tabular (Fig. 3 C, D) is pointed anteriorly, where it probably fits

against the lateroposterior edge of the postorbital. The dorsal part of

the bone flares out and down, forming a small otic notch at a point

halfway back. Posteriorly, the flange attains a dorsoventral width of

2.0 mm. at the edge of the notch. The slender posterior process of the

tabular which continues beyond the flange is approximately 0.5 mm. in

diameter and 5.0 mm. long.

_Ventral Aspect_ (Fig. 4)

The palatal view of the skull shows the paired premaxillary, maxillary,

palatine, pterygoid, and quadrate bones. The openings for the internal

nares, the ventral orbital fenestrae, and the subtemporal fossae are

readily recognized. The quadrate processes extend posteriorly leaving a

large gap medially at the posterior end of the skull.

[Illustration: FIG. 4. _Hesperoherpeton garnettense_ Peabody. Palate

reconstructed; ventral aspect at left, showing teeth, dorsal aspect at

right. KU 10295, x 4.]

The left quadrate appears to be in place on the posterior prong of the

pterygoid. The dorsal side of the quadrate is grooved between two

anterolaterally directed ridges. The groove, which probably held the

end of the stapes, extends about half the width of the quadrate itself.

The width of the quadrate is 4.0 mm., the length is 4.5 mm. medially

and about 2.0 mm. laterally. In ventral view the quadrate appears to

project laterally, but is incomplete and its shape uncertain. The

distance from the posterior end of the quadrate to the visible

posterior edge of the orbital fenestra, which opens ventrally, is 10.0

mm.

This region between the quadrate and the orbit is occupied by a

pterygoid with three projections. Anteriorly, the pterygoid outlines

most of the posterior edge of the orbit (a distance of about 6.5 mm.).

A lateral process separates the orbit from the subtemporal fossa. A

posteriorly directed edge defines the fossa, which extends about 6.5

mm. anteroposteriorly. The lateral process of the pterygoid terminates

10.0 mm. from the midline. Both the lateral and posterior pterygoid

processes are approximately 2.0 mm. wide. The greatest width of the

subtemporal fossa is about 2.0 mm. The medial border of the orbital

fenestra is missing, but apparently consisted of the pterygoid for at

least the posterior half.

Along the posterior edge of the orbital fenestra, there is a narrow,

dorsally projecting flange of the pterygoid. The lateral opening of the

orbit is approximately 7.5 mm. wide.

The remaining border of the orbital fenestra on the anterior and medial

sides is formed by a bone occupying the position of palatine and vomer;

for convenience we designate this as palatine. When reconstructed in

its probable position in relation to the pterygoid, the left palatine

lacks a section, on its medial and posterior edges, measuring about 2.5

mm. by 9.0 mm. The lateral margin of the palatine is convex; about 5.5

mm. anterior to the orbit this margin curves into a strong anteriorly

pointing projection, medial to which is seen the internal narial

opening. The remaining anterior edge is slightly convex, smoothly

rounded, and meets the midline about 9.0 mm. anterior to the pterygoid.

The void area medial to the palatine and anterior to the pterygoid does

not fit any bone which we can recognize as the parasphenoid. It is thus

suspected that this area is covered in part by the missing edge of the

palatine and partly by an anteromedial extension of the pterygoid. Of

course a parasphenoid may also have been present.

The position, length, and shape of the premaxillary shown in palatal

view (Fig. 4) are primarily based upon the dorsal appearance since

ventrally most of it cannot be seen. At the point where it forms the

anterior border of the internal naris, the premaxillary is slightly

wider than the maxillary and seems to become narrower as it approaches

the midline.

The ethmosphenoid, which we cannot identify, may have been exposed in a

gap between the premaxillary and the palatine. The gap measures

approximately 8.0 mm. wide and ranges up to 1.0 mm. anteroposteriorly.

The maxillary begins at a suture with the premaxillary lateral to the

naris and continues posteriorly, bordering the orbit with a width of

about 1.2 mm. It then tapers to a point approximately 2.0 mm. anterior

to the lateral projection of the pterygoid. The width of the maxillary

at this point is 0.8 mm. and the posterior end is broken; probably when

complete it approached the pterygoid, and either met the latter or had

a ligamentous connection with it. As nearly as can be determined, the

total length of the maxillary is approximately 12.0 mm.

The teeth on the maxillary are small and seem to be in two longitudinal

rows. The palatine bears two large, grooved teeth anteriorly; the first

is approximately 1.0 mm. posteromedial to the naris and the second is

about 3.0 mm. posterior and slightly lateral to the naris. The flat

ventral surfaces of the palatine and pterygoid bear numerous small

teeth distributed as shown in Fig. 4.

_Braincase and Occipital Region_ (Fig. 5)

The parts of the neurocranium are scattered, disconnected and

incomplete, but it is possible to make out a number of features of the

otico-occipital section with fair assurance. In posterior view the

notochordal canal and foramen magnum are confluent with each other, and

of great size relative to the skull as a whole. The notochordal canal

measures 2.8 mm. in diameter, and the foramen magnum about 4.0 mm. The

crescent-shaped supraoccipital rests on the upright ends of the

exoccipitals, but between the latter and the basioccipital no sutures

can be seen. Probably the whole posterior surface of the braincase

slanted posteroventrally; consequently the rim of the notochordal canal

was about 3.0 mm. behind the margin of the parietals.

The U-shaped border of the notochordal canal is a thick, rounded bone,

comparable in appearance to the U-shaped intercentra of the vertebrae.

This bone apparently rested upon a thinner, troughlike piece (Fig. 5 B)

forming the floor of the braincase. The latter is broad, shallow,

concave, open midventrally and narrowing anteriorly to form a pair of

articular processes. Since no sutures can be seen in this structure, it

probably is the ventral, ossified portion of the basioccipital. Watson

(1926, Fig. 4 B) illustrates the floor of the braincase in

_Eusthenopteron_, with its more lateral, anterior portion labelled

prootic, but in our specimen the corresponding part could scarcely have

formed the anterior wall of the otic capsule, being entirely in the

plane of the floor. The two articular surfaces anteriorly near the

midline suggest that a movable joint existed between the

otico-occipital part of the braincase and the ethmosphenoid part, as in

Rhipidistia (Romer, 1937). We have found nothing in the specimen that

could be referred to the ethmosphenoid; it may have been unossified.

[Illustration: FIG. 5. _Hesperoherpeton garnettense_ Peabody, KU 10295,

x 4. A, occipital view of skull; B, basioccipital bone in dorsal

(internal) view.]

The otic capsules appear to have rested against lateral projections of

the basioccipital. The single otic capsule that can be seen (the

right) is massively built, apparently ossified in one piece, with a

shallow dorsomedial excavation, probably the vestige of a supratemporal

fossa. On the lateral face is a broad, shallow depression dorsally, and

a narrower, deeper one anteroventrally; these we suppose to have

received the broader and narrower heads of the stapes, respectively.

The posterior wall of the otic capsule we have designated opisthotic in

the figure. Anterior to the otic capsule the lateral wall of the

braincase cannot be seen, and may not have been ossified.

The roof of the braincase is visible in its ventral aspect, extending

from approximately the occipital margin to a broken edge in front of

the parietal foramen, and laterally to paired processes which overlie

the otic capsules directly behind the orbits (see dotted outlines in

Fig. 1). Each of these postorbital processes, seen from beneath,

appears to be the lateral extension of a shallow groove beginning near

the midline. Presumably this section of the roof is an ossification of

the synotic tectum. It should be noted that the roof of the braincase

proper is perfectly distinct from the overlying series of dermal bones,

and that the parietal foramen can be seen in both. The roof of the

braincase in our specimen seems to have been detached from the

underlying otic capsules and the occipital wall.

The bone that we take to be the stapes is blunt, flattened (perhaps by

crushing), 5.0 mm. in length, and has two unequal heads; its width

across both of these is 4.0 mm. The length is appropriate to fit

between the lateral face of the otic capsule and the dorsal edge of the

quadrate; the wider head rests on a posterodorsal concavity on the otic

capsule, and the smaller fits a lower, more anterior pit. Laterally the

stapes carries a short, broad process that probably made contact with a

dorsally placed tympanic membrane. Thus the bone was a hyomandibular in

the sense that it articulated with the quadrate, but it may also have

served as a stapes in sound-transmission. It contains no visible canal

or foramen.

_Mandible_ (Fig. 6)

The crushed inner surface of the posterior part of the left mandible

and most of the external surface of the right mandible are preserved in

close proximity. Although the whole length of the tooth-bearing margins

is missing, some parts of six elements of the right mandible can be

seen. The pattern of sutures and the general contour closely resemble

those of _Megalichthys_ (Watson, 1926, Figs. 37, 38) and other known

Rhipidistia.

The anteroposterior length of the mandible is about 23.8 mm., and the

depth is 3.8 mm. The dentary extends approximately 17.6 mm. back from

the symphysis, and its greatest width is probably 2.0 mm. Its lower

edge meets all the other lateral bones of the jaw. The splenial and

postsplenial form the curved anteroventral half of the jaw for a

distance of about 9.0 mm. The fragmented articular, on the posterior

end of the jaw, is 4.0 mm. long and 2.0 mm. deep, exhibiting a broken

upper edge; presumably the surface for articulation with the quadrate

was a shallow concavity, above the end of the articular.

[Illustration: FIG. 6. _Hesperoherpeton garnettense_ Peabody. Right

mandible, lateral view, KU 10295, x 4. External surfaces are pitted;

broken surfaces are coarsely stippled.]

A New Order of Fishlike Amphibia From the Pennsylvanian of Kansas · 第 9 / 20 题