CHAPTER IV

THE FURNITURE OF A MEDIEVAL PARISH CHURCH: CONCLUSION

§ 46. Our parish churches, as we have them to-day, are stripped of much

that made them beautiful. The cold walls, often scraped of all their

plaster and whitewash; the windows, glazed with white glass, or with

modern glass of very uncertain merit, reveal merely the structural

skeleton of the building. The robe of colour with which the interior

was clothed is gone; and only fragments here and there remain to tell

us of the beauty of the decorative art which was, at the close of the

middle ages, at its very highest point. But enough is left to enable us

to picture to ourselves the appearance of the interior of an English

medieval church, and reconstruct that arrangement of furniture and

pictorial decoration which made it so beautiful.

§ 47. To take, first, the features common to nave and chancel alike,

the walls of the building were covered with paintings executed on a

plaster surface. As might be expected, the best remains of such

paintings are to be found in districts where the churches are built

of rubble, and the plaster covering, necessary to the internal

wall-surface, afforded the fullest field for this form of decoration.

There are numerous and beautiful examples in Sussex and Surrey, from

which a good idea may be gained of the general scheme of painting in a

medieval church. The earlier wall-paintings, such as those at Copford

in Essex, or South Leigh in Oxfordshire, or the probably thirteenth

century paintings at Easby in Yorkshire, are stiff in drawing and

somewhat crude in colouring. From the earliest times, however, this

method of decoration was adopted, and gradually assumed a more

independent existence and a more pictorial character. As the history

of art advanced, and the demand for special kinds of work increased,

the lesser arts, hitherto treated as mere servants of masoncraft,

began to strike out paths for themselves. The painters at Pickering

in Yorkshire or at Raunds in Northamptonshire, treated the walls on

which they worked as the backgrounds of strong and brightly coloured

designs bearing no relation to the architectural divisions of the

building. Where the space to be covered was limited, like the wall

between two aisle windows, the treatment was more restrained: in these

positions there occur, as at St Breage in Cornwall, panel pictures

of saints. In the north aisle at Kettering there is a faded picture

of St Roch, the blue background of which, studded with gold stars,

is a beautiful example of medieval colour. But the general treatment

pursued by the later medieval painters, in their subject and figure

painting, was unconfined by architectural limits, and sometimes a

single subject spreads below and round a window. Above the chancel

arch was usually a painting of the Doom, of which traces remain in

many churches, as at Holy Trinity, Coventry, and (much restored) at

St Thomas, Salisbury. At Liddington in Rutland and at Kettering, the

Doom seems to have been extended to the north and south walls of the

nave: there is on the north clerestory wall at Kettering, a figure

of an angel looking towards the middle of the wall above the chancel

arch; while there are remains on the south wall at Liddington, of a

huge whale-like figure representing the mouth of Hades. The subjects

represented in these paintings were of the utmost variety. A good

idea of the beauty of colour attained by the artists of the fifteenth

and sixteenth centuries may be gained from a study of the fragmentary

figure and pattern paintings at Cirencester or the important remains

at Bloxham. To the end of the middle ages much pattern and diaper work

was used in painting large surfaces or filling in backgrounds. In

several Northamptonshire churches the soffits of arches are covered

with reddish brown scrolls of leafage, at its best most elaborate

and delicate. The shafts in the angles of the tower at Fairford are

painted with a spiral pattern in two colours, like a barber's pole, and

at Fairford and Burford there are important remains of late diapered

backgrounds. One of the best pieces of fifteenth century diaper

painting known to the present writer is that above the chancel arch at

Llanbedr-ystrad-yw in Breconshire, which served as a background to a

rood and figures of St Mary and St John.

[Illustration: Fig. 15. Patrington, Yorks: interior, looking across

nave from south transept.]

§ 48. Mural painting, however, was little more than a complement to the

stained or painted windows, which were the most gorgeous note of colour

in the medieval fabric. There is no more familiar feature of medieval

architecture than the gradual increase in the size of windows, due to

that constant progress in the science of architectural construction, in

which the timber-roofed parish church followed the vaulted cathedral.

The low round-headed windows of the twelfth century were followed by

the long lancets of the early thirteenth century. Lancets gradually

drew closer and closer together, and were united with spherical

openings above, until the mullioned window with its geometrical

tracery was formed. The restless spirit of the medieval craftsman was

not satisfied with tracery imprisoned within geometrical limits: the

enclosing circles and triangles were removed, and the tracery twined

in naturalistic curves in the head of the window. Then, at the middle

of the fourteenth century, the limit of the imitation of nature was

reached. The Black Death formed a sudden division between the work of

the old school and the new age, and that formalism in window tracery

began, which lasted for years, and left its mark on our architecture

as late as the days of the Stewarts. It was long the fashion among

those who saw merely the decline in architectural detail, distinctive

of the 'Perpendicular' style, to speak of the magnificent achievements

of the fifteenth century masons with an overbearing contempt. As a

matter of fact, fifteenth century builders were gifted with a power of

design, and an ability to plan a parish church as a whole, unequalled

in the previous history of medieval art. They lost their interest

in sculptured detail, because their main concern was with the broad

contrasts of light, shade, and colour, which their large windows and

high walls afforded--contrasts in which there was no use for minute

detail, and the deep under-cutting and delicate carving of the earlier

styles became mere waste of time. The great sheets of coloured glass,

in which, as time went on, painting became of more and more importance,

and large figures beneath tall canopies of white glass took the place

of the smaller subjects and more deeply coloured canopies and grounds

of an earlier time, supplied an effect fully as beautiful as that once

given by the contrasts of bold projections and deep hollows in moulded

arches and carved foliage. The mason in no small degree sacrificed

his skill to the glazier; but, in the service of the glazier, his

power of noble design on a large scale increased. No effect of colour

can well surpass that which is still to be seen in some of our late

medieval churches--the grisaille windows of the chancel at Norbury in

Derbyshire, the late fourteenth century figure glass of the north aisle

at Lowick in Northamptonshire, the fifteenth century east window of

the south aisle at St Winnow in Cornwall, the fourteenth century Jesse

tree, once in St Chad's, and now in St Mary's at Shrewsbury, or the

fifteenth century Jesse tree at Llanrhaiadr-yn-Cynmerch, near Denbigh.

Some of the parish churches of York are almost as rich in glass as the

cathedral itself. But, in those churches which are still so fortunate

as to retain nearly all their medieval glass, like All Saints, North

Street, at York, St Neot in Cornwall, and Fairford, the lack of the

connecting link which the mural paintings between the windows formed

in the colour-scheme is sadly felt. At Fairford, in particular, where

the wall-painting which remains is not near the windows, the glass, in

its frame of cold plastered wall, gives the effect of isolated masses

of almost violent colour, which need to be reduced to their proper

key by the painting of the intermediate wall surfaces. On the other

hand, at Pickering or Raunds, where we have the mural paintings, the

glass is wanting. Often, where painting and stained glass have both

disappeared, as in the chapel at South Skirlaugh, their necessity to

the building forces itself on the attention. Probably, the full value

of stained and painted glass in architectural design, and the relations

which prevailed at the close of the middle ages between the mason and

glazier, can be judged nowhere in Europe better than in King's college

chapel at Cambridge.

§ 49. The third source of colour to the church, apart from the

stonework and the stained glass, was the woodwork of roofs, screens,

and other pieces of furniture. With this must be reckoned also the

colour of the stone furniture of the church, the sedilia, canopied

tombs, stone reredoses, pulpits, and so on. As a rule, the colouring of

the stone, here as upon the walls, has faded away or has been obscured

by later coats of plaster or whitewash. Here and there, as at Higham

Ferrers, a tomb-canopy keeps not a little of its original brilliance.

There is a gorgeous coloured frame, probably much restored, for a

reredos in the north chapel at Worstead in Norfolk. The panels of the

reredos in the south aisle at Northleach contain certain figures of

saints, in faded green, red, and blue. The fine reredoses in the side

chapels of St Cuthbert's at Wells have brilliant remains of gilding.

But coloured woodwork, which has lost little of its brightness, is

fairly common, and, though it has often been subjected to drastic

restoration, is sometimes almost untouched by time. This type of art

reached its highest point in the churches of East Anglia, in the great

roofs, with their figures of angels at the end of the hammerbeams or

at the foot of the principal rafters, extending from end to end of

the building, in the canopies of the fonts, like that at Ufford St

Mary, near Woodbridge, and in the rood screens, like that at Ranworth,

its openings fringed with cusping of gilded plaster, and its panels

painted with figures of saints and archangels, which sometimes, as at

Southwold, were set within a raised frame of gilded gesso work.

§ 50. This setting of colour, towards which stone, wood, and glass all

contributed their share, constituted the great beauty of the internal

effect of a medieval parish church; and naturally, the more the various

craftsmen who worked there advanced in skill--their skill growing in

proportion to their opportunity--the more gorgeous was the effect of

the assemblage of brilliant windows, screens, and pictured walls. The

usual entrance would be through the south porch. Near the entrance, or,

at any rate, near the west end of the church, stood the font, beneath

its canopy. No piece of church furniture was subject to so much variety

of design as the font; and the types vary from perfectly unadorned

examples to structures of the utmost richness. The canopy was sometimes

a simple cover, which could be moved by hand: often it was a towering

structure, suspended by pulleys from the ceiling: sometimes it formed

a roofed enclosure on carved uprights, within which the font stood,

of stone at Luton in Bedfordshire, of wood at Trunch in Norfolk. Some

fonts, like the famous one at Little Walsingham in Norfolk, perhaps the

most beautiful of those on which the seven Sacraments are represented,

stand on high stepped platforms: others are on a low plinth, which is

occasionally continued from the base of a neighbouring column. In fact,

the arrangement of fonts is as various as their shape. The rest of the

furniture of the nave would vary. Some of the East Anglian churches,

such as Irstead in Norfolk, or Dennington and Fressingfield in Suffolk,

keep many of the medieval benches, with narrow seats, backs with carved

lines of open-work, and projecting ledges which to-day are used for

book-rests, but were originally intended as kneelers. Worshippers would

kneel on these ledges, with their feet on the seats behind: the age

of hassocks had not come, and the floor was hardly an ideal kneeling

place. Many English churches were seated with benches of this kind

during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Few parts of England

are without their examples of bench-ends. Many fine examples remain in

Cornwall, as at Launcells, and in Somerset, as at Trull; and in some

churches, as Down St Mary and Lapford in Devon, the early sixteenth

century bench-ends are almost complete. Wooden benches, however, do not

seem to have become general till a comparatively late date, and there

was probably little seating accommodation in the earlier churches.

The plinths of columns were sometimes made of some size, as at

Coddington in Notts, to afford seats; and in some churches, as Belaugh

and Tunstead in Norfolk, and Cotterstock, Tansor, and Warmington in

Northamptonshire, there are stone benches round the inner walls of

various parts of the church, apparently for the same purpose.

[Illustration: Fig. 16. Well, Yorkshire: font cover.]

§ 51. At the east end of each aisle, as has been shewn, there was

very frequently an altar. This was enclosed within screens, shutting

off, as a rule, the eastern part of the aisle. The screens remain at

Dennington, where the loft above the rood screen was continued round

them, with fine effect. At Wolborough in south Devon, the side screens

also project from the main screen; and, in many cases where the screens

themselves have disappeared, holes in the adjacent columns, vertical

grooves in the bases, and other similar signs, bear witness to their

former existence. All the side altars of a church would be fenced in

by screens. In large churches, such as Grantham, there was often more

than one chapel in an aisle: the north and south aisles of the nave at

Grantham contained at least two chapels each. There were four chapels

in the south aisle at Ludlow, three in the north: the transepts each

contained two chapels; and, in addition to these, five of the arches of

the nave had chapels beneath them, while the altar of the Cross stood

at the east end of the nave in front of the tower.

§ 52. A nave like this would be broken up by a great variety of

screen-work; for the clear vista from end to end and side to side of

a building, so dear to the restorer of the middle of the nineteenth

century, formed no part of the medieval ideal. A space, however, would

be kept clear near the pulpit, which, at Ludlow, stood west of the

first pier from the east of the north arcade. The stone pulpit at

Cirencester is in much the same position; at Wolverhampton, it is on

the south side of the nave; at Nantwich it is against the north-east

pier; at Holy Trinity, Coventry, against the south-east pier of the

central tower. The medieval pulpits of Devonshire stand just west

of the rood screen; some, like Kenton, on the north; others, like

Dartmouth, on the south side of the entrance. The sermon was hardly

so prominent a feature in the services of the medieval church as it

became at a later date; but many medieval pulpits remain, and those at

Wolverhampton and Coventry, in particular, are imposing structures. The

regular furniture of the nave was completed by the pulpit. However,

there are some other features to notice. Each altar, or, at any rate,

each of the more important altars, would have its own piscina: the

chantries at the ends of the aisles sometimes had their own sedile or

sedilia. On a bracket near, or in a niche behind each altar, would be

a figure, carved and painted, of the saint to whom it was dedicated;

and before certain altars where a light or lights were maintained

there would be hanging lamps or stands for candles according to the

endowment. Thomas Sibthorpe, when he founded his chapels at Beckingham,

provided for lights before each altar: in the chantry certificates made

under the chantry act of Edward VI, many notices are found of stocks of

money by which lights were maintained to burn before specified altars.

There would be a holy water stoup in the wall, on the right hand as one

entered the church: often the stoup is found in the porch. In some of

the Norfolk churches--Sall, Cawston, Aylsham, and Worstead are the best

instances--the lower part of the tower is screened off from the nave,

the screen supporting a floor which forms a ringers' gallery. In the

ringers' gallery at Sall there is a kind of crane, by which the cover

of the font, which stands close to the west end, is lifted. In a few

churches, as at Weston-in-Gordano in Somerset, there are remains of a

small gallery above the main doorway of the church. This is sometimes

explained as a gallery used on Palm Sunday by the semi-chorus who

joined in chanting the processional hymn. Such a gallery might be used

by singers or minstrels on special occasions.

§ 53. The transepts, where they occur, were, as has already been said,

used as chapels, or divided off into more than one chapel. Little need

be said of the chapels on either side of the chancel, as the general

arrangement of their altars and furniture was not very different from

that of the chancel itself. The quire and chancel were divided from the

nave by the rood screen. This important piece of furniture, usually of

wood, but sometimes of stone, crossed the chancel arch from side to

side; and was often continued, in churches where the chancel arch was

omitted, across the west end of the chancel aisles. Where there was

a chancel arch, the chancel chapels had their own screens. The rood

screen was elaborately carved, and its lower panels were painted with

figures of angels, saints, prophets, apostles, and other designs. The

uprights dividing the panels were continued upwards on either side

of open panels, sometimes treated as tall arched openings, at other

times imitating the form of mullioned windows, and were framed into a

plinth at the bottom, and a horizontal beam at the top. The central

division of the screen was closed by folding doors: on either side

of this entrance was sometimes, against the west side of the screen,

an altar. At Ranworth in Norfolk the screen altars are enclosed by

panels returned from the face of the screen: there are distinct

traces of this arrangement at Weston-in-Gordano and other places;

and, at Lapford and Swymbridge in Devon, there are large rectangular

openings in the traceried panels of the upper part of the screens,

across which painted cloths seem to have been stretched at the back of

the side altars. Above the screen, with its floor-beams laid across

the top, and attached to either face by a series of trusses which

formed a deep coved and ribbed cornice to the screen, was the loft,

gallery, or, as it was often called, the 'solar.' Sometimes, as at

Montgomery and Llanwnog, the screen was double, the floor of the loft

forming a roof to the space between. This upper story had a projecting

parapet on either side, the front of which was divided into panels

and painted. It was approached by a staircase, the position of which

varied greatly. In churches with an aisleless chancel, the stair was

contained in a turret to the north or south of the chancel arch, which

was, if there was little room for it, sometimes built out into the

adjacent chapel. At Dennington, however, where the loft was continued

round the screens at the end of the nave aisles, the staircase is in

the south wall of the south aisle. At Ropsley, near Grantham, the stair

is in the outer wall of the north aisle, near the north-east corner;

and the loft was approached by a bridge thrown across the end of the

north aisle. In the aisleless church of Little Hereford, near Tenbury,

where there is a very narrow chancel arch, the loft was approached

by a straight stair in the thickness of the south half of the east

wall: a right-angled turn at the top led straight into the loft. In

churches with aisled chancels, the stair was commonly contained in

a turret projecting from the outer side of the north or south wall,

and there were lofts continued across all the screens of the chancel

and its chapels. At Llywel in Breconshire, there is a fairly broad

straight staircase at right angles to the loft, contained in a broad

projection from the north wall of the aisleless nave: this was a

favourite arrangement in Wales, and occurs at Patricio, and, in the

more primitive form of a wooden stair within a projecting window, at

Llanwnog in Montgomeryshire. Wooden stairs and even ladders to lofts

were probably not unusual. At Totnes the chief approach to the loft of

the stone screen was a stairway in a half-octagon, projecting into the

north part of the chancel, from the head of which the way lay along the

loft of the adjoining parclose screen. Few lofts, however, remain. The

Totnes loft, which was of wood, is gone. Several Welsh lofts, owing, no

doubt, to their remote position, escaped destruction when the general

dismantling of rood lofts was carried out in the reign of Elizabeth.

The most magnificent of these are at Patricio in Breconshire, Llanegryn

in Merionethshire, Montgomery and Llanwnog in Montgomeryshire, and

Llananno in Radnorshire. Less beautiful, but remarkable for the very

perfect state of its painted back-board, is the loft at Llanelieu in

Breconshire. But in remote English places, such as Blackawton, near

Dartmouth, Cotes-by-Stow in Lincolnshire, and Hubberholm in west

Yorkshire, lofts are left in a fair state of perfection.

[Illustration: Fig. 17. Banwell, Somerset: rood screen.]

§ 54. The use of the loft was, it has often been said, for the deacon

to sing the gospel from at high mass on great festivals. This was

certainly the case with the stone _pulpita_ above the quire screens

of collegiate and monastic churches. But, in most parish churches the

stair was so narrow and inconvenient that certainly the vestments and

probably the temper of the deacon who attempted to climb it would be

easily spoiled. In many lofts, it is true, there was an altar. The

piscina of one remains in a few churches, as at Little Hereford: there

was a chantry founded in 1349 at one in Grantham church, where the

screen was a large one of stone. But the habitual use of the loft was

as an organ gallery; and the fine screen at Newark-on-Trent still has

at its east side the rectangular projection which was occupied by a

'pair of organs.' The rood itself, the great cross bearing the figure

of our Lord with statues of St Mary and St John upon either side,

stood upon a beam which crossed the chancel arch above the loft. The

beam was, of course, painted, and, in addition to the statues which

it carried, bore sockets for candles, which were lighted on festival

occasions. The corbels which supported rood beams are sometimes seen:

beams themselves, however, do not often remain. There is a finely

painted example of one at Tunstead in Norfolk; and another remains

at Cullompton in Devon. Here and there, where the beam was fixed in

the wall, and had to be sawn away, the end may still be seen. Some

screens had no loft: in these cases the rood frequently stood upon the

top of the screen. In some cases, as at Llanelieu in Breconshire and

Wenhaston in Suffolk, the rood and its attendant figures were fixed

upon a painted board which formed a back to the loft, and filled the

upper part of the chancel arch. In other places, as at Hickleton, near

Doncaster, and Llanbedr-ystrad-yw, they were fixed against the wall

above the chancel arch. This would be the case where, as at Hickleton,

the arch was low and narrow, and there was no room for a separate beam

beneath it. No piece of church furniture is more interesting than the

rood screen and its accompaniments: the variety of local design and of

its arrangements, and the great beauty of the finished work, make it,

of all special topics of ecclesiology, perhaps the most attractive.

§ 55. It has been said before that the hooks by which the Lenten veil

was suspended across the chancel arch are still to be seen in several

churches. The western part of the chancel was occupied by the quire,

whose stalls were returned along the back of the screen, the rector's

stall being the end return stall on the south side. Quire stalls in

parish churches were often carved with great refinement and beauty:

the stalls at Walpole St Peter have each a stone canopy, formed by

recessing panels in the chancel wall. The finest stalls, with their

hinged seats, rightly called misericords, and wrongly misereres, are

usually to be found in collegiate or chantry churches, like Higham

Ferrers or Ludlow, where the chantry priests of the Palmers' guild

said their offices together in the high chancel. The stalls of the

chantry college at Fotheringhay are now in the churches of Tansor and

Benefield; the quire stalls of St Mary's at Nottingham are in the

suburban church of Sneinton. An excellent instance of the combination

of stalls and rood screen is found in the village church of Ashby St

Ledgers, near Daventry, which contains a large amount of old woodwork.

In the centre of the quire or, as a gospel-desk, on the north side of

the altar would stand the lectern. The number of medieval lecterns

remaining in England is not great, the finest being the great brass

lectern given by provost Hacomblen to King's college, Cambridge.

Lecterns in which the desk takes the form of a bird are sometimes

found, as in Norwich cathedral and at Ottery St Mary.

§ 56. When interest was first revived in ecclesiology, the fashion

of raising the quire and chancel above the rest of the church, by a

number of steps intended to be symbolical, became very prevalent. This,

however, was not in keeping with medieval practice. It is true that

occasionally chancels were raised high above the rest of the church.

At Walpole St Peter the chancel, rebuilt in the fifteenth century, was

brought up to the churchyard boundary, and apparently interfered with

a right of way which led round the back of the old chancel. It was

therefore built with a floor raised high above the nave, and the right

of way was preserved by piercing an arch below. St Leonard's at Exeter

has a chancel built over an archway which affords access to a narrow

street. A church built on a slope, like Tansor, ascends noticeably from

west to east. But the ascent is contrived, not by means of flights of

steps, but by an inclined plane. As a rule, floors of churches sloped

slightly upwards towards the altar. A perfectly level floor gives the

false effect in perspective of a downward slope: a floor, on the other

hand, with a gradual upward slope has a level effect. The floor of the

quire was sometimes elevated by a single shallow step above the floor

of the nave: very generally, it was on the same level: at St Michael's,

Cambridge, the level was slightly lower. The chancel, again, was a step

higher than the quire, and the altar stood slightly raised upon its

own oblong altar pace. The levels at Geddington in Northamptonshire

remain much as they were. The quire is on a level with the nave: the

chancel is a pace higher, and the altar stands upon its own pace. An

inscription round the foot of the chancel wall records the making of

the pavement (now renewed) and the _scabella_, by which the foot-paces

are almost certainly implied, of the altar in 1369. Round the lower

foot-pace of the south chapel is another inscription, apparently of the

same date. In no respect have modern restorations been so disastrous

as in the altering of original levels, in order to give the altar the

elevation which was supposed by the restorers to be necessary.

§ 57. The altar itself, as can be seen from the many altar-slabs

which remain, was a long and fairly broad stone table: it was usually

less than three feet high, and was covered by a cloth and frontal.

It is probable that the frontal, like the vestments of the clergy,

followed, in the ordinary parish church, no very strict sequence of

colour according to the seasons. For festivals the handsomest and

newest frontal and vestments would probably be used. The altar was

kept fairly low, to make room for the reredos, which extended across

the east wall above the altar, and below the sill of the east window.

It will be found that modern restorers, in nine cases out of ten,

have disregarded old English uses, by raising an altar until its upper

surface is close to the sill of the window, and then by blocking up

part, or even the whole of the window, by reredoses or altar screens

of stone or wood. High reredoses and altar screens were not unknown,

of course, in England; but the ordinary reredos was a single or

double band of carving below the east window, as at Geddington or

Ludlow. At Stanion in Northants, the string-courses of the east walls

of the chancel and north chapel are raised, below the east windows,

to form frames for mural paintings or carved retables above the

altar. Sculptured tablets were not rare, and indications of their

presence may be traced: in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, the

alabaster, dug out of the Chellaston 'plaster-pits,' and worked by the

'plasterers' of Nottingham, was used, among other purposes, for such

tablets. On the north and south sides of the reredos the altar was

enclosed by curtains hung on brass rods projecting from the wall or

from upright standards. These curtains, known as riddels, had sockets

for candles at the ends of the rods. They appear to be derived from the

curtains which hung round the altar canopies of basilican churches, and

were drawn at the consecration of the elements. Probably the reredos,

in most churches, was formed by a painted cloth--that is, a piece of

embroidered tapestry--hung behind the altar, or stretched from the

upright of the one to the upright of the other riddel. It may be added

that the arrangement of cross, candles and flower vases on a shelf,

or even on several shelves, at the back of the altar, with which we

are so familiar, was not frequent in the middle ages. The cross was

usually the central carved or embroidered feature of the reredos: one

or two lighted candles were placed upon the altar at mass; and flowers

and sweet smelling herbs would be strewn at certain seasons on the

chancel floor. Richness of colour and simplicity of furniture were the

distinguishing features of the medieval altar. There is a curious ledge

upon the back part of the upper surface of the crypt altar at Grantham:

it actually lies _upon_ the altar, and its height, as contrasted with

that of the modern gradine or shelf, affords the same contrast that

there is between the low foot-paces of the medieval, and the flights of

steps of the modern chancel.

§ 58. The statue of the patron saint stood near the altar, on a corbel

in the wall, in a canopied recess, or, as at Abbots Kerswell in

Devon, where there is a very large figure of the Virgin, in the jamb

of a window. In front of the altar, the pyx, or receptacle for the

reserved Sacrament, hung by chains from the roof: it was covered by an

embroidered veil, which was drawn aside when the pyx was opened. The

rest of the ordinary furniture of the chancel was of a more permanent

description. The piscina and sedilia, which are frequently of one date

and form part of one design, were on the south side of the chancel,

forming arched recesses in the wall. The number of sedilia varied from

one to three: more than three are seldom found in a parish church.

Permanent stone sedilia were usually regarded as part of the regular

furniture of the chancel. Occasionally their place was supplied by the

lowering of a window sill; but there were also instances, no doubt, in

which the sedile or sedilia were simply wooden chairs placed near the

south wall of the chancel. The piscina was frequently supplied with an

upper ledge for cruets. In the piscina of the south aisle at Hawton,

near Newark, there is an inner recess for this purpose on the east

side; at Tansor a shallow niche is provided in the head of the arch

of the piscina. The drain of the piscina was usually within the wall;

but there are a number of twelfth century, and a few later, examples,

in which the bowl forms a projection from the wall, and the drain was

contained in a detached column, the base of which is frequently united

to the foot of the wall. Projecting bowls are common, with drain-holes

which slant downwards into the wall. A piscina is sometimes found

in the sill of a window: one at Grantham is fitted with a removable

drain, and there are other such examples. A drain in the chancel floor

is sometimes found, usually of a rather early period. In addition

to the piscina, most churches contain plain almeries or cupboards,

rectangular recesses with rebates for wooden doors: these are generally

in the north or east wall of the chancel.

§ 59. More exceptional--indeed, very uncommon--as a piece of furniture,

was the permanent Easter sepulchre, which usually was on the north, but

sometimes on the south of the chancel. This was the place to which the

Host was carried on the evening of Holy Thursday, and left until Easter

eve: it was symbolical of the sepulchre of our Lord, and the services

which took place in connexion with it were sometimes of a somewhat

dramatic character. A permanent Easter sepulchre, like those at Hawton

and Heckington, was a luxury. These, and the sepulchre at Navenby, have

carvings referring to the story of the Resurrection, and in the lower

panels are represented the guards at the tomb. The recess at Hawton,

forming a triple opening, has an inner recess at the back, which could

be shut and locked. At Heckington and Navenby the recesses are merely

single cupboards, surrounded by elaborate carving. Frequently, an

almery was used for the purpose; and where, as at Frating in Essex,

Claypole in Lincolnshire, or Sefton in Lancashire, an almery is treated

with special care, as, for example, with a floral hood-mould, this

special use is indicated. There may also have been removable sepulchres

of wood: a piece of furniture which remains at Cowthorpe in Yorkshire,

is said to be one. Another was made for St Mary Redcliffe, Bristol,

in 1440. Certainly, the sepulchre was often a temporary arrangement,

like the _reposoir_ in a French church to-day. Thomas Meyring of

Newark directed his burial to take place 'where the sepulchre of our

Lord was wont to be set up at Easter.' A founder's tomb near an altar

was also used for the sepulchre, the receptacle for the Host being

probably placed inside the tomb-recess or against it. At Sibthorpe near

Newark, the small sepulchre is immediately above the founder's tomb:

this was probably the case at Fledborough. At Owston, near Doncaster,

a tomb-recess in the north chancel wall is often called the Easter

sepulchre, and a projecting stone at one side of it is pointed out as

a stone for the watcher who kept guard over the tomb at Easter. The

majority of Easter sepulchres which are left belong to the fourteenth

century. The imposing structure at Northwold in Norfolk, which is on

the south of the chancel, is of the fifteenth century, and, in at

least one example, at Wymondham in Norfolk, also on the south side,

there are details which approach the Renaissance period. The frequent

identity of the founder's tomb with the Easter sepulchre, for which

there is documentary evidence, is proved further by the tombs of the

rector and vicar, under whose auspices, in the second quarter of the

sixteenth century, the chancels of South Pool and Woodleigh churches

in south Devon were restored. These are vaulted recesses north of the

altar, containing table tombs with effigies, and a large amount of

florid carving, which shews signs of Renaissance influence. On the wall

at the back of either tomb are sculptures dealing with the burial and

resurrection of our Lord, which clearly point to the use of the tombs

at Easter, and justify the name of Easter sepulchre, frequently applied

to them. A third tomb of rather later date is at West Alvington, in

the same neighbourhood: its details were suggested by South Pool and

Woodleigh, but the brasses of the back wall are gone, and its inclusion

in the list of Easter sepulchres is doubtful. There is a curious late

thirteenth century piece of work, projecting inwards from the north

wall of the chancel at Twywell, near Kettering. A tomb-recess forms the

lowest stage; above this is a double almery, which may have been an

Easter sepulchre, and above this, again, is a sloping stone desk with

a book-rest for the reader of the gospel. Stone gospel-desks are found

in a few Derbyshire churches, like Crich, Spondon, and Etwall; and in a

few other rare instances. A founder's tomb is, of course, by no means

an invariable feature of a chancel. The natural place for the burial of

the founder of a chantry would be close to the altar where his chantry

was celebrated; and often, as at Grantham, the presence of a tomb in an

aisle wall indicates the existence of a chantry altar near that spot.

[Illustration: Fig. 18. Hawton, Notts: Easter sepulchre.]

§ 60. The sacristy has been referred to in the previous chapter; and

with this description of the furniture of the chancel, our account of

the English parish church is nearly come to an end. Few persons who

are in the habit of visiting parish churches will fail to meet with

exceptional or unique features. For example, in the north wall of the

chancel at Scawton in north Yorkshire, there is a long oblong trough,

with a drain in the wall behind it, the use of which is difficult

to conjecture. At Tunstead in Norfolk, there is a narrow platform

behind the altar, the whole width of the east wall. At its south end

is a stair from the floor of the chancel; and near the stair is a

door leading into a chamber below the platform. This narrow room,

far too small for a sacristy, is lighted by a grating in the floor

of the platform. It is supposed that this was an arrangement for the

exhibition of relics. At Tanfield, near Ripon, there is a little

cell-like recess in the wall between the chancel and north chapel, with

a window commanding the altar. The problems which are set by these

details bring us by degrees into relation with the whole of medieval

life; and the history of the parish church becomes an important part of

the social history of the parish. The magnificent tombs of the Marmions

at Tanfield also recall to us an artistic feature of the parish church

which opens out a wide field, and can be dealt with here only so far as

the tombs themselves afford evidence as to the date of the part of the

church in which they occur.

§ 61. The actual development of the parish church comes to an end

with the Reformation. The building of great churches, cathedral

and monastic, ceased with the suppression of the monasteries.

The suppression of the chantries, and the new doctrines which it

symbolised, did away with one object which had been a powerful

consideration with the lay benefactor of parish churches. Henceforward

the best work of those English masons who, in every county, had for

generations shaped the course of medieval art, and, with it, the best

work of the wood-carvers and glaziers, is found in private houses.

In the early part of the seventeenth century, under the influence of

Laud, much restoration and rebuilding was done. Wood-carvers filled

many churches with furniture of great beauty and historical value.

Churches like St John's at Leeds, or the little chapel of Carlton

Husthwaite in Yorkshire, are, in stone and woodwork alike, complete

examples of the work of this period. Brancepeth, Sedgefield, and

Eaglescliffe in Durham; Burneston in north Yorkshire; and, above all,

Croscombe in Somerset, contain wooden furniture which one would not

willingly exchange for medieval work. But, in spite of the richness and

picturesqueness of seventeenth century woodwork, the art of the Laudian

revival had no power to strike out new lines for itself. The chancels

of Astley Abbots in Shropshire, Kelmarsh in Northamptonshire, and

Barsham in Suffolk, interest us by their quaint adaptation of Gothic

detail: they tell us nothing new. The art of the mason, as regards the

parish church, is exhausted.

§ 62. At a later date, Wren built parish churches with an extraordinary

elasticity of style and plan. But the study of Wren's plans is simply

the study of the plans of an individual architect: they are the

outcome of his relation to the fashions of his day, and his unrivalled

capacity for dealing with them. He established firmly the use of a

modified Palladian style in church architecture, which his successors

imitated until nothing further could be done with it. But, when we

look at his churches, we never can forget the architect behind them.

St Martin's-in-the-Fields and St Mary-le-Strand, by Gibbs; St Philip's

at Birmingham, by Archer, fine churches though they are, fall short

of his designs; and we instinctively compare and contrast their plan

and elevation with the models supplied by Wren. In the medieval parish

church, on the other hand, the individual architect had no place;

the whole artistic activity of an age was represented; the builder

was an original artist, and a member of a nation of artists; and the

development of the parish church was the work of a national interest,

not merely confined to one highly specialised profession. When the

Gothic revival came in the early nineteenth century, it was thought

that medieval art was once more re-born. But, when we look to-day

at the scholarly and often extremely beautiful work of artists like

Pugin, Sir Gilbert Scott, Street, Pearson, Butterfield, Bodley, or the

younger Gilbert Scott, we still feel the force of individual design and

style rather than the force of a great collective movement. All these,

like Wren, have added individual contributions to church planning and

decoration; but their art is a by-path of national life, and is merely

the result of a purely individual type of thought.

§ 63. At the same time, to say this is not to belittle post-Reformation

church architecture. It is simply to point out the contrast between

the work of the architect and the work of the medieval mason, between

a sporadic development of art, and a development which was general in

every part of the country.

But, while the work of later generations differs in quality and

spirit from that of the medieval craftsman, while it is necessarily

more sophisticated and less spontaneous than his, no greater mistake

can be made than to drive it out of our churches. The Reformation

and Cromwell have been made responsible for much destruction: yet

no one has destroyed so light-heartedly as the modern restorer, in

his efforts to bring back churches to what is called their 'original

state.' To-day, people are waking up to the value of post-Reformation

masonry and furniture. They realise that when an eighteenth century

church is swept away, and a handsome building, in an eclectic Gothic

style, decked with the best products of modern arts and crafts, rises

in its place, the advantage is questionable. Not merely does much good

furniture inevitably perish, but a link with the past is destroyed.

Eighteenth century pews may not be altogether suited to a fifteenth

century church; but they remind us at any rate that the fabric in

which they stand has a continuous history. The age which produced

them followed its own taste and worked on its own lines, and did not

merely strive after an ideal of harmonious imitation. Not only the

work of recent centuries has been touched, but medieval work has been

altered: screens have been mutilated and removed, old glass has been

destroyed, even whole fabrics have been rebuilt with very slight

regard to their earlier plan. It can never be impressed too strongly

upon the average Englishman that, quite apart from their religious

associations, the parish churches of this country form, as a body,

one of the most remarkable historical monuments which any European

nation possesses. We may regret, perhaps, that past generations have

tampered with them; but for that very reason we should hesitate to

tamper with them ourselves, or to replace incongruous work of the past

by imitative work of our own. We may well use our individual energy

and our new ideas in adding to their number; but our treatment of the

older work, where it positively calls for renewal, should be tender,

conservative, and self-effacing. The excellence of the medieval mason's

work consists largely in his avoidance of self-consciousness, in its

perfectly natural and spontaneous feeling: if we attempt to impose our

individuality upon his work, we are in danger of supplying to future

and, it may be hoped, wiser generations a contrast from which they will

not fail to draw a melancholy profit.

BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE

Books exclusively devoted to the subject of the English parish church

are few in number, and generally are in the form of descriptions of the

churches of special districts, or of monographs on individual churches.

1. Among the older books in which special attention is paid to parish

churches, the following may be mentioned:

BLOXAM, M. H., _Principles of Gothic Ecclesiastical

Architecture_, 11th ed., 2 vols., London, 1882.

BRANDON, J. R. and J. A., _Parish Churches_, London,

1888. [Perspective views, ground plans, and short descriptions.]

ECCLESIOLOGICAL [Cambridge Camden] SOCIETY, _A

Hand-Book of English Ecclesiology_, London, 1847.

NEALE, J. P., and LE KEUX, J., _Views of the most

interesting collegiate and parochial churches in Great Britain_, 2

vols., London, 1824-5.

PARKER, J. H., _Introduction to the study of Gothic

Architecture_, 12th ed., Oxford and London, 1898.

RICKMAN, T., _An attempt to discriminate the styles of

English Architecture_, 7th ed., Oxford and London, 1881.

WICKES, C., _The spires and towers of the mediaeval churches

of England_, London, 1859.

2. More modern works, in which the development of the ground plan is

treated as part of the general subject, are:

BOND, F., _Gothic Architecture in England_, London, 1905.

BROWN, G. BALDWIN, _The Arts in Early England_, vol.

II, London, 1903.

PRIOR, E. S., _A history of Gothic art in England_, London,

1900.

SCOTT, G. G., _An essay on the history of English Church

Architecture_, London, 1881.

3. Among volumes dealing with special districts, the following may be

mentioned:

BUCKLER, G., _Twenty-two churches of Essex_, London, 1856.

COX, J. C., _Notes on the churches of Derbyshire_, 4 vols.,

Chesterfield and London, 1875-9.

CRANAGE, D. H. S., _An architectural account of the churches

of Shropshire_, Wellington (in course of publication).

MCCALL, H. B., _Richmondshire Churches_, London, 1909.

NORTHAMPTON, _Architectural notices of the churches of the

Archdeaconry of_, London, 1849.

SHARPE, E., _An account of the churches visited during the

Lincoln excursion of the Architectural Association_, London, 1871.

SHARPE, E., and others, _Churches of the Nene Valley_,

London, 1880.

WILSON, F. R., _An architectural survey of the churches in

the Archdeaconry of Lindisfarne_, Newcastle-on-Tyne, 1870.

4. Books upon individual churches cannot be mentioned here, nor can

any detailed list be given of the numerous valuable articles in such

publications as _Archaeologia_ and the _Archaeological Journal_. Some

of the most enlightening work upon the subject is to be found in the

papers contributed by the late J. T. Micklethwaite to the transactions

of various societies. Those on Saxon churches in vols. LIII

and LIV of the _Archaeological Journal_, and the plans contributed by

him to J. W. Walker's _History of All Saints, Wakefield_(Wakefield,

1888), may be specially mentioned.

5. Books on the subject of church furniture are numerous. The most

comprehensive modern handbook on the subject is J. C. Cox and A.

Harvey's _English Church Furniture_, London, 1907. More detailed

treatment of separate articles of furniture is given in F. Bond's

_Screens and Galleries_, _Fonts and Font-Covers_, etc., volumes of a

series now in course of publication. J. T. Fowler's edition of _The

Rites of Durham_ (Surtees Society, 1903), and Rock's _Church of our

Fathers_, edited by G. W. Hart and W. H. Frere (4 vols., London,

1903-4), are a mine of information on points connected with church

services and furniture.

6. The historical aspect of the parish church is treated excellently

by E. L. Cutts, _Parish Priests and their People in the Middle Ages_

(London, 1898). But, to gain an adequate knowledge of this side of the

question, the study of original documents is necessary, and chiefly of

the contents of episcopal registers. Of these invaluable texts some

have been printed in full, and of others there are printed abstracts,

but the vast majority remain in manuscript. The fullest printed series

is the _Exeter Episcopal Registers_ (ed. F. C. Hingeston-Randolph),

covering the period 1258-1455: the York registers from 1216 to 1285

(ed. J. Raine and W. Brown for the Surtees Society), and the Hereford

registers from 1275 to 1327 (ed. W. W. Capes and others for the

Cantilupe and Canterbury and York Societies) are also full and accurate

editions. Much information with regard to the foundation of chantries

and other important subjects may be obtained from the Calendars of the

Patent Rolls and of Letters from the Papal Registers, published under

the direction of the Master of the Rolls. The Chantry Certificate Rolls

and Inventories of Church Goods drawn up between 1547 and 1549 are also

sources of great value: these have been printed for some counties, but

the greater number are still unpublished.

J. C. Cox and R. M. Serjeantson's _History of the Church of the Holy

Sepulchre, Northampton_ (Northampton, 1897) may be cited as a model

history of a parish church. The arrangement of the topographical

sections of the various Victoria County Histories makes it possible to

study the history of a large number of churches in company with their

architecture.

INDEX

Abbots Kerswell, Devon, 122

Abingdon, Berks., 33

Acaster Malbis, Yorks., 92

Acton Burnell, Salop, 79

Adlingfleet, Yorks., 19

Ainderby Steeple, Yorks., 82

Aldwinkle St Peter, Northants., 88

Alveley, Salop, 36

Alvington, West, Devon, 127

Arnold, Notts., 83

Arundel, Sussex, 37

Ashby St Ledgers, Northants., 118

Astley Abbots, Salop, 130

Auckland St Andrew, Durham, 79

Avening, Glouces., 77

Aylsham, Norfolk, 111

Aysgarth, Yorks., 30

Banwell, Som., 113

Bardfield, Great, Essex, 80

Barnack, Northants., 4, 53, 70

Barsham, Suffolk, 130

Barton-le-Street, Yorks., 67, 68

Barton-on-Humber, Lincs., St Peter's, 54

Bath, Som., cathedral priory, 35

Battlefield, Salop, 28

Beccles, Suffolk, 73

Beckingham, Lincs., 21, 22, 33, 82, 111

Bedale, Yorks., 74, 96

Bedminster, Som., 49

Belaugh, Norfolk, 109

Benefield, Northants., 118

Berkeley, Glouces., 34

Beverley, Yorks., St Mary's, 69

Beverstone, Glouces., 36

Biggleswade, Beds., 33

Birmingham, Warwicks., St Martin's, 31;

St Philip's, 130

Blackawton, Devon, 116

Blakeney, Norfolk, 87

Bloxham, Oxon., 101

Boothby Pagnell, Lincs., 82

Bosham, Sussex, 97

Boston, Lincs., 31, 36, 62

Bottesford, Lincs., 79

Boughton, Northants., 30

Boxgrove, Sussex, priory church, 35

Bracebridge, Lincs., 76, 77

Bradford-on-Avon, Wilts., 70, 77

Bradwell-juxta-Mare, Essex, St Peter's on the Wall, 2, 3

Brancepeth, Durham, 129

Branston, Lincs., 9, 10, 15, 58

Bridgnorth, Salop, 29

Bridgwater, Som., St Mary Magdalene's, 96

Bridlington, Yorks., priory church, 17

Bristol, St Mary Redcliffe, 48, 49, 66, 95, 96, 126

Brixworth, Northants., 4, 53, 54, 55, 56

Bunbury, Cheshire, 28

Burford, Oxon., 35, 42, 43, 44, 45, 48, 49, 88, 97, 102

Burgh-next-Aylsham, Norfolk, 78

Burneston, Yorks., 84, 85, 129

Burnsall, Yorks., 30

Burton Lazars, Leices., 92

Caistor, Lincs., 58

Cambridge, Clare college, 38;

Corpus Christi college, 31, 89;

Jesus college chapel, 38, 39;

King's college chapel, 105, 118;

Michaelhouse, 38;

St Peter's college, 34, 38, 89;

Trinity Hall, 38;

St Benedict's, 89;

St Botolph's, 35;

St Edward's, 38;

Little St Mary's, 34, 38, 89;

St Michael's, 38, 119

Canterbury, Kent, cathedral, 4, 70;

St Martin's, 2

Car Colston, Notts., 83

Carlton Husthwaite, Yorks., 129

Carlton-in-Lindrick, Notts., 57

Castle Rising, Norfolk, 77

Cawston, Norfolk, 111

Chaddesden, Derby, 38, 84

Chellaston, Derby, 121

Cherry Hinton, Cambs., 79

Chesterfield, Derby, 32, 33, 41

Chipping Norton, Oxon., 32

Chipping Sodbury, Glouces., 32

Churchdown, Glouces., 68

Cirencester, Glouces., 39, 40, 41, 48, 49, 72, 73, 101, 110

Claypole, Lincs., 84, 88, 124

Cleobury Mortimer, Salop, 36

Clovelly, Devon, 28

Coddington, Notts., 109

Coln St Denis, Glouces., 56

Coneysthorpe, Yorks., _see_ Barton-le-Street

Copford, Essex, 100

Cotes-by-Stow, Lincs., 116

Cotterstock, Northants., 28, 37, 83, 109

Coventry, Warwicks., Holy Trinity 45, 48, 49, 101, 110;

St Michael's, 45, 46, 47, 49, 65

Cowthorpe, Yorks., 124

Crediton, Devon, 32

Crich, Derby, 127

Croft, Yorks., 36, 82, 84

Cromhall, Glouces., 75

Croscombe, Som., 36, 129

Croyland abbey, Lincs., 14, 88

Cullompton, Devon, 117

Darlington, Durham, 90

Dartmouth, Devon, St Saviour's, 110

Deerhurst, Glouces., 54, 55

Dennington, Suffolk, 80, 108, 109, 114

Dereham, West, Norfolk, abbey, 11, 12

Donington, Lincs., 75

Down St Mary, Devon, 108

Dronfield, Derby, 84

Durham, cathedral, 8

Eaglescliffe, Durham, 129

Earl's Barton, Northants., 53

Easby, Yorks., 100

Easingwold, Yorks., 68

Elm, Cambs., 59

Elmley, Worces., castle chapel, 29

Elstow abbey, Beds., 88

Ely, Cambs., cathedral, 6, 59, 81

Escomb, Durham, 77

Etwall, Derby, 127

Exeter, Devon, St Leonard's, 119

Exton, Rutland, 61, 62

Fairford, Glouces., 102, 104

Farnacres, Durham, 29

Fledborough, Notts., 82, 126

Fleet, Lincs., 75

Fotheringhay, Northants., 28, 37, 118

Fowey, Cornwall, 75

Frampton, Lincs., 61

Frating, Essex, 124

Fressingfield, Suffolk, 108

Frome Selwood, Som., 45

Geddington, Northants., 120, 121

Gedney, Lincs., 60, 65

Gisburn, Yorks., 11

Gloucester, cathedral, 8

Grantham, Lincs., 24, 25, 31, 34, 42, 49, 61, 65, 71, 72, 74, 89, 95,

96, 109, 116, 122, 123, 127

Gretton, Northants., 92

Grinton, Yorks., 30

Haccombe, Devon, 28

Hale, Great, Lincs., 56

Hallaton, Leices., 25, 97

Halsall, Lancs., 84, 89

Harringworth, Northants., 88

Hawstead, Suffolk, 93

Hawton, Notts., 82, 88, 123, 124, 125

Heckington, Lincs., 82, 85, 89, 124

Hedon, Yorks., 30, 79

Hereford, cathedral, 34

Hereford, Little, Heref., 114, 116

Heslerton, West, Yorks., 79

Hessle, Yorks., 30

Hexham, Northumb., priory church, 4, 35

Hickleton, Yorks., 117

Higham Ferrers, Northants., 28, 37, 66, 90, 97, 105, 118

Hitchin, Herts., 33

Hodgeston, Pembroke, 85

Hooton Pagnell, Yorks., 59

Hough-on-the-Hill, Lincs., 53

Houghton-le-Spring, Durham, 78, 79

Hubberholm, Yorks., 116

Hull, Yorks., Holy Trinity, 30

Hungerton, Leices., 36, 68

Hythe, Kent, 96

Immingham, Lincs., 64

Irstead, Norfolk, 108

Islip, Northants., 88

Jarrow-on-Tyne, Durham, St Paul's, 4

Kelmarsh, Northants., 130

Kenton, Devon, 110

Kettering, Northants., 62, 66, 100, 101

Ketton, Rutland, 66

Kewstoke, Som., 35

Keyston, Hunts., 66

Kirkburn, Yorks., 56

Kirkby in Malhamdale, Yorks., 11, 12

Kirkby Wiske, Yorks., 82

Langton, East, Leices., 83

Lapford, Devon, 108, 114

Lastingham, Yorks., 96

Launcells, Cornwall, 108

Lavenham, Suffolk, 70, 87, 90

Lawford, Essex, 80

Leeds, Yorks., St John's, 129

Leicester, St Mary's in the Castle, 65

Leigh, South, Oxon., 100

Leighton Buzzard, Beds., 33

Leverington, Cambs., 59

Lichfield, Staffs., cathedral, 81

Liddington, Rutland, 101

Lincoln, cathedral, 9, 10, 16, 34

Lindisfarne, Northumb., 5

Llananno, Radnor, 115

Llanbedr-ystrad-yw, Brecon, 102, 117

Llanegryn, Merioneth, 115

Llanelieu, Brecon, 116, 117

Llanfair-ar-y-bryn, Carmarthen, 74

Llanfihangel-cwm-du, Brecon, 74

Llanrhaiadr-yn-Cynmerch, Denbigh, 104

Llanwnog, Montgom., 114, 115

Llywel, Brecon, 74, 115

London, old St Paul's, 80;

St James Garlickhithe, 26;

St Martin in the Fields, 130;

St Mary-le-Strand, 130

Louth, Lincs., 32, 33, 62

Lowick, Northants., 104

Lowthorpe, Yorks., 26, 27, 37

Ludlow, Salop, 31, 34, 48, 110, 118, 121

Luffenham, North, Rutland, 85

Luton, Beds., 33, 108

Madley, Heref., 96

March, Cambs., 94

Margaretting, Essex, 60

Melford, Long, Suffolk, 34, 36

Melton Mowbray, Leices., 67

Middleham, Yorks., 28

Mitford, Northumb., 78

Monkwearmouth, Durham, 4, 5, 53

Montgomery, 114, 115

Morpeth, Northumb., 93

Nantwich, Cheshire, 84, 110

Navenby, Lincs., 82, 124

Newark-on-Trent, Notts., 31, 35, 42, 65, 96, 116, 126

Newport, Salop, 28

Newton Nottage, Glamorgan, 74

Norbury, Derby, 75, 84, 104

Northampton, All Saints', 32

Northleach, Glouces., 105

Northwold, Norfolk, 126

Norton-on-Tees, Durham, 52

Norwich, Norfolk, cathedral, 8, 118;

St Peter Mancroft, 90

Nottingham, St Mary's, 32, 118

Oadby, Leices., 64

Oakham, Rutland, 61

Oswestry, Salop, 50

Othery, Som., 94

Othona; _see_ Bradwell-juxta-Mare

Ottery St Mary, Devon, 118

Oundle, Northants., 62, 66, 96

Owston, Yorks., 126

Oxford, Merton college chapel, 39

Patricio, Brecon, 115

Patrick Brompton, Yorks., 82, 84

Patrington, Yorks., 62, 82, 83, 84, 99

Peterborough, Northants., cathedral, 4, 5, 6

Pickering, Yorks., 100, 104

Pleshy, Essex, 28

Pool, South, Devon, 70, 71, 126, 127

Preen, Salop, 93

Preston-in-Holderness, Yorks., 30

Quenington, Glouces., 67

Ramsey, Hunts., abbey church, 6

Ranworth, Norfolk, 106, 112

Raskelf, Yorks., 68

Rauceby, Lincs., 61

Raunds, Northants., 66, 89, 100, 104

Ripon, Yorks., cathedral, 4

Rochester, Kent, cathedral, 4

Romaldkirk, Yorks., 82

Ropsley, Lincs., 114

Rotherham, Yorks., college of Jesus, 25

Rothwell, Northants., 96

Rushden, Northants., 66, 90

Rushton, Northants., 90

St Breage, Cornwall, 100

St Michael Penkivel, Cornwall, 38, 73

St Neot, Cornwall, 104

St Peter's on the Wall; _see_ Bradwell-juxta-Mare

St Winnow, Cornwall, 104

Salisbury, Wilts., cathedral, 49;

St Thomas, 101

Sall, Norfolk, 73, 87, 111

Sampford, Great, Essex, 80

Sandiacre, Derby, 78, 84

Sawley, Derby, 90

Scarborough, Yorks., 42

Scawton, Yorks., 76, 128

Sedgefield, Durham, 129

Selby, Yorks., abbey church, 17

Sherburn-in-Elmet, Yorks., 35

Sherston Magna, Wilts., 36

Shrewsbury, Salop, St Chad's, 104;

St Mary's, 104

Sibthorpe, Notts., 22, 26, 37, 82, 126

Skipwith, Yorks., 55

Skirlaugh, South, Yorks., 30, 105

Sleaford, Lincs., 61

Sneinton, Notts., 118

Snettisham, Norfolk, 67

Sompting, Sussex, 61

Southwell, Notts., cathedral, 81

Southwold, Suffolk, 106

Spalding, Lincs., 13, 14, 32

Spondon, Derby, 127

Stainfield priory, Lincs., 11

Stamford, Lincs., St Mary's, 31

Stanion, Northants., 121

Stebbing, Essex, 80

Stoke-by-Nayland, Suffolk, 87

Stony Stratford, Bucks., 33

Stottesdon, Salop, 36

Stratford-on-Avon, Warwicks., 32, 66

Stratton Strawless, Norfolk, 36

Sutton, King's, Northants., 67

Sutton, Long, Lincs., 32, 60, 89

Swymbridge, Devon, 114

Tamworth, Staffs., 29

Tanfield, West, Yorks., 128

Tansor, Northants., 56, 73, 90, 109, 118, 119, 123

Tattershall, Lincs., 28

Terrington St John's, Norfolk, 74

Tewkesbury, Glouces., abbey church, 35

Thaxted, Essex, 33, 73

Thirsk, Yorks., 96

Tickhill, Yorks., 63

Tideswell, Derby, 84, 90

Tilney All Saints, Norfolk, 60

Tilty, Essex, 80

Tong, Salop, 28

Totnes, Devon, 115

Trull, Som., 108

Trunch, Norfolk, 91, 108

Tugby, Leices., 58, 59

Tunstead, Norfolk, 87, 117, 128

Twywell, Northants., 127

Tydd St Giles, Cambs., 75

Ufford St Mary, Suffolk, 106

Wakefield, Yorks., cathedral, 35

Walpole St Peter, Norfolk, 86, 87, 88, 93, 118, 119

Walsingham, Little, Norfolk, 108

Walsoken, Norfolk, 60

Walton, West, Norfolk, 60, 75

Warmington, Northants., 109

Warwick, St Mary's, 97

Wath, Yorks. (North Riding), 89

Weaverthorpe, Yorks., 58

Well, Yorks., 107

Wellingborough, Northants., 88

Wells, Som., St Cuthbert's, 105

Wenhaston, Suffolk, 117

Wenlock priory, Salop, 93

Wensley, Yorks., 91

Westborough, Lincs., 88

Westbury-on-Trym, Glouces., 29, 47

Weston-in-Gordano, Som., 111, 114

Whaplode, Lincs., 60

Willingham, Cambs., 88

Winchester, Hants., cathedral, 6, 8, 34

Witham, North, Lincs., 76, 77

Witney, Oxon., 36

Wolborough, Devon, 109

Wolverhampton, Staffs., 29, 110

Woodborough, Notts., 83

Woodleigh, Devon, 126, 127

Worcester, cathedral, 34

Worstead, Norfolk, 105, 111

Wrexham, Denbigh, 47

Wymondham, Norfolk, 126

Yarmouth, Great, Norfolk, 42

York, cathedral, 85;

St Mary's abbey, 85;

All Saints', North Street, 104;

St William's college, 25

Ythanceaster; _see_ Bradwell-juxta-Mare

CAMBRIDGE: PRINTED BY JOHN CLAY, M.A. AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS.

The Historical Growth of the English Parish Church · 第 4 / 4 章