XXXI.

The third lion of Arles has nothing to do with the

ancient world, but only with the old one. The church

of Saint Trophimus, whose wonderful Romanesque

porch is the principal ornament of the principal _place_,

- a _place_ otherwise distinguished by the presence of

a slim and tapering obelisk in the middle, as well as

by that of the Hotel de Ville and the museum - the

interesting church of Saint Trophimus swears a little,

as the French say, with the peculiar character of

Arles. It is very remarkable, but I would rather it

were in another place. Arles is delightfully pagan,

and Saint Trophimus, with its apostolic sculptures, is

rather a false note. These sculptures are equally re-

markable for their primitive vigor and for the perfect

preservation in which they have come down to us.

The deep recess of a round-arched porch of the

twelfth century is covered with quaint figures, which

have not lost a nose or a finger. An angular, Byzan-

tine-looking Christ sits in a diamond-shaped frame at

the summit of the arch, surrounded by little angels,

by great apostles, by winged beasts, by a hundred

sacred symbols and grotesque ornaments. It is a

dense embroidery of sculpture, black with time, but as

uninjured as if it had been kept under glass. One

good mark for the French Revolution! Of the in-

terior of the church, which has a nave of the twelfth

century, and a choir three hundred years more recent,

I chiefly remember the odd feature that the Romanesque

aisles are so narrow that you literally - or almost -

squeeze through them. You do so with some eager-

ness, for your natural purpose is to pass out to the

cloister. This cloister, as distinguished and as per-

fect as the porch, has a great deal of charm. Its four

sides, which are not of the same period (the earliest

and best are of the twelfth century), have an elaborate

arcade, supported on delicate pairs of columns, the

capitals of which show an extraordinary variety of

device and ornament. At the corners of the quadrangle

these columns take the form of curious human figures.

The whole thing is a gem of lightness and preserva-

tion, and is often cited for its beauty; but - if it

doesn't sound too profane - I prefer, especially at

Arles, the ruins of the Roman theatre. The antique

element is too precious to be mingled with anything

less rare. This truth was very present to my mind

during a ramble of a couple of hours that I took just

before leaving the place; and the glowing beauty of

the morning gave the last touch of the impression. I

spent half an hour at the Museum; then I took an-

other look at the Roman theatre; after which I walked

a little out of the town to the Aliscamps, the old

Elysian Fields, the meagre remnant of the old pagan

place of sepulture, which was afterwards used by the

Christians, but has been for ages deserted, and now

consists only of a melancholy avenue of cypresses,

lined with a succession of ancient sarcophagi, empty,

mossy, and mutilated. An iron-foundry, or some hor-

rible establishment which is conditioned upon tall

chimneys and a noise of hammering and banging, has

been established near at hand; but the cypresses shut

it out well enough, and this small patch of Elysium is

a very romantic corner.

The door of the Museum stands ajar, and a vigilant

custodian, with the usual batch of photographs on

his mind, peeps out at you disapprovingly while you

linger opposite, before the charming portal of Saint

Trophimus, which you may look at for nothing.

When you succumb to the silent influence of his eye,

and go over to visit his collection, you find yourself

in a desecrated church, in which a variety of ancient

objects, disinterred in Arlesian soil, have been ar-

ranged without any pomp. The best of these, I be-

lieve, were found in the ruins of the theatre. Some of

the most curious of them are early Christian sar-

cophagi, exactly on the pagan model, but covered with

rude yet vigorously wrought images of the apostles,

and with illustrations of scriptural history. Beauty

of the highest kind, either of conception or of execu-

tion, is absent from most of the Roman fragments,

which belong to the taste of a late period and a

provincial civilization. But a gulf divides them from

the bristling little imagery of the Christian sarcophagi,

in which, at the same time, one detects a vague

emulation of the rich examples by which their authors

were surrounded. There is a certain element of style

in all the pagan things; there is not a hint of it in

the early Christian relics, among which, according to

M. Joanne, of the Guide, are to be found more fine

sarcophagi than in any collection but that of St. John

Lateran. In two or three of the Roman fragments

there is a noticeable distinction; principally in a

charming bust of a boy, quite perfect, with those

salient eyes that one sees in certain antique busts, and

to which the absence of vision in the marble mask

gives a look, often very touching, as of a baffled effort

to see; also in the head of a woman, found in the

ruins of the theatre, who, alas! has lost her nose, and

whose noble, simple contour, barring this deficiency,

recalls the great manner of the Venus of Milo. There

are various rich architectural fragments which in-

dicate that that edifice was a very splendid affair.

This little Museum at Arles, in short, is the most Ro-

man thing I know of, out of Rome.

A little tour in France(#2159) · 第 32 / 41 题