To this letter Mr. Gibbs replied thus:--

Dear Sir,--i cant make much of your letter except a riglemerole

about pigs and dinamite and pictures but what they have to do with one

another i dont know if you want some pork why dont you say so strait out

like mr Hobson does i shall be killing one this week shall i send you a

nice leg and remain

Yours obedient

Henry Gibbs.

My reply, given in the affirmative, resulted in the arrival of a

succulent-looking joint with a bill for leg of pork special 5½ lbs.

at 2_s._ per lb. 11_s._

As the price too was rather special I returned the bill with the

following:--

My dear Mr. Gibbs,--What a rapturous piece of pork! Lovely in

life, and oh, how beautiful in death. I count the hours till 7.30

to-morrow.

I am truly sorry you couldn't read my letter with comfort. I have

derived great pleasure from yours. You appear to have a strong leaning

towards phonetic orthography which is very refreshing and seems to bear

the same relation to the generally accepted rules of the art that the

modern dynamic art (a favourite topic of mine, as you know) does to the

academics of the late nineteenth century.

When the proof-sheets of my book arrive I should be glad of your

assistance in going through them. My tendency, I think, is to

over-punctuate, and your proclivity would, I believe, counteract this.

_Mais revenons à nos moutons_ (_mutatis mutandis_, of course). The

specialist who superintends my diet allows me to eat pork at 1_s._ 9_d._

per lb., but does not approve of my indulgence in it at a higher figure.

If you will meet his views (and I am sure you will) I shall absorb my

full share of the dainty you have provided. Otherwise I must return it

with many exquisite regrets.

Anticipating your favourable recognition of my specialist's absurd

prejudice, I enclose a cheque for 9_s._ 8_d._

Accept my word for it that I am

Yours ever most truly,

Arthur K. Wilkinson.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 159, July 21, 1920 · 第 27 / 33 题