Eighth Ward: The prevailing diseases of the past season have been

fevers of the typhus, typhoid, remittent and intermittent types,

cholera infantum, scarlatina, dysentery, and diarrhoea, all confined to

densely populated tenements. The typhus and typhoid fevers have been of

a malignant type in two houses, twelve out of eighteen cases proving

fatal.

Ninth Ward: The prevailing diseases during the past season have been

typhoid fever, dysentery, diarrhoea, scarlet fever, measles, and a few

cases of variola.

[Sidenote: Seeds of Disease Uncontrolled]

Sixth Ward: The seeds of disease exist everywhere, and although

removable and susceptible of sanitary control, they are yet

uncontrolled, and at any time may spring into activity and a terrific

life, that shall only have the power and effect of death. Cholera,

when it visits these shores again, will first break forth here, if

proper sanitary measures be neglected. Typhus fever nests exist in

all parts of the district; and it has been traced from these nests to

every ward in the city, spreading the disease not only in the worst

localities, but into the homes of the industrious, the wealthy, and the

highest classes of society. This disease is now on the increase, and if

proper sanitary measures are not adopted to remove the predisposing and

the infecting causes, we may again have an epidemic of that scourge.

Fourteenth Ward: There have been attended in this district, during

the last year, over 200 cases of typhoid and typhus fever by one

dispensary physician; also, 70 cases of dysentery, and 50 cases of

smallpox. There is one particular locality which has contributed to the

spread and intensity of the fever contagion, viz.: the little street

known as Jersey Street. It is always filthy, and the effluvia arising

therefrom is extremely offensive. The privies are generally full nearly

to overflowing, and the yards are also in a dirty condition, heaps of

refuse matter being allowed to remain and to accumulate continually

in many of them. There is no sewer in this little street, though the

streets at each end are sewered.

[Illustration: A PERPETUAL FEVER-NEST: REAR TENANT-HOUSES IN WASHINGTON

STREET, 1865]

[Sidenote: Where Disease Flourishes]

Tenth Ward: The most prominent diseases during the past year have been

phthisis, typhoid and scarlet fevers, cholera infantum, dysentery,

smallpox, and diphtheria. They were most prevalent in the poorest part

of the district, having the lowest ground, the filthiest streets, and

the most dense population of poor and careless people, who are crowded

in the numerous tenant-houses, shanties, and small dwellings, which

were built for one or two families, but are now made to contain from

five to ten.

Nineteenth Ward: The diseases that have chiefly prevailed during the

past season are dysentery, diarrhoea, cholera morbus, cholera infantum

and the exanthematous fevers. They were of the most frequent occurrence

in the most crowded and insalubrious quarters.

Fifteenth Ward: Since the commencement of the survey, scarlet fever,

typhoid fever, smallpox, and cholera infantum have prevailed in the

tenant-houses of this ward. Six cases of smallpox occurred in one of

three thickly peopled rows of such dwellings, and the disease was

communicated to a child in an adjacent street, who had been playing in

the infected neighborhood. Seven cases of typhoid also occurred in a

court among children, and this was within a few doors of better class

houses.

Eleventh Ward: Typhus and typhoid fevers have been found prevailing

in all sections of this district. Smallpox, scarlatina, measles, and

pulmonary diseases are met with in almost every street. Typhus is the

most typical of the preventable diseases that abound in the Eleventh

Ward. Cholera infantum and obstinate diarrhoeal maladies were prevalent

in the rear tenements and throughout the lowest streets during the

summer and autumn.

To give you an idea of the wide prevalence of these diseases, I will

notice one or two more in detail.

[Sidenote: Smallpox]

Smallpox is the very type of preventable diseases. We have a safe

and sure preventive in thorough vaccination. And yet this loathsome

disease is at this moment an epidemic in New York. In two days’ time,

the inspectors found 644 cases, and in two weeks, upward of 1,200;

and it was estimated that only about one-half were discovered. In

many large tenant-houses, six, eight, and ten cases were found at the

same time. They found it under every conceivable condition tending to

promote its communicability. It was in the street cars, in the stages,

in the hacks, on the ferry-boats, in junk-shops, in cigar-stores,

in candy-shops, in the families of tailors and seamstresses, who

were making clothing for wholesale stores, in public and in private

charities. I hold in my hand a list of cases of smallpox found

existing under circumstances which show how widespread is this disease.

Bedding of a fatal case of smallpox was sold to a rag-man; case in a

room where candy and daily papers were sold; case on a ferry-boat;

woman was attending bar and acting as nurse to her husband who had

smallpox; girl who was making cigars while scabs were falling from her

skin; seamstress who was making shirts for a Broadway store, one of

which was thrown over the cradle of a child sick of smallpox; tailors

making soldiers’ clothing, have their children, from whom the scabs

were falling, wrapped in the garments; a woman selling vegetables had

the scabs falling from her face, among the vegetables, etc., etc.

Instances of this kind can be quoted at any length, but these examples

are sufficient to show that smallpox spreads uncontrolled throughout

our city. And they show, too, how this disease is disseminated abroad.

Says the Inspector of the Fourth Ward:

[Sidenote: Smallpox in Tailored Garments]

“In localities where smallpox prevailed I found, in some instances

within a few feet of the patients, tailors at work for our best

clothing establishments. Such infected vestments--worse than the tunic

of the Centaur--bring disease and death not only to the wearers, but

to many others. The occupant of the crowded tenant-house procures from

such a source a coat or a blanket, and soon a loathsome pest attacks

the young and unprotected members of his family, and ultimately spreads

through the entire quarter, destroying life after life and endangering

the health of a whole community.

“Smallpox, suddenly breaking out in some secluded rural district, often

owes its unsuspected origin to the above causes. In the remote solitude

of the ocean the seaman opens the chest in which he has deposited such

obnoxious apparel, and from this Pandora’s box scatters the seeds of

pestilence among his comrades, which, ripening, shall spread its germs

to distant ports.”

Or, what is more striking, take the following from the report of the

Inspector of the Fifth Ward:

“The largest wholesale establishments for the sale of dry goods

on this side of the Atlantic Ocean are in immediate contact with

the tenant-houses of the worst class, and which are infested with

smallpox and typhus fever. The two freight depots and the principal

passenger depot of the Railroad Company are in the same close

association with these nests of infection. In the region immediately

surrounding are also situated several hotels, and a large number of

boarding-houses, whose inmates are thus in danger of personal contact

with these diseases any moment. West Broadway, running through the

very centre of the district, is traversed by five different lines of

railway cars, with an average of five cars passing every minute, and

carrying millions of passengers yearly by the very doors of these

houses. Broadway, at but a short distance removed, is the principal

thoroughfare of the city. Hudson Street on the west is also a leading

route for city travel; and the cross streets of the district are

traversed daily by multitudes to reach various lines of steamboats,

cars, and steamships, which leave the city opposite this point.

[Illustration: A REGION OF SMALLPOX AND TYPHUS FEVER, 1865]

“All this large amount of daily travel passes through a region always

containing cases of typhus fever, and largely infected with smallpox.

Is it any cause of surprise that cases of these diseases are here

contracted, to be carried to distant sections of the country, there to

develop themselves, to the surprise and alarm of whole neighborhoods?

It is also well to remember that several large livery stables

are located in the immediate neighborhood, whose vehicles, it is

well-known, are frequently employed to carry persons, suffering from

these diseases, to hospitals, or to attend at funerals. These vehicles

are, perhaps, immediately afterward driven to the various car and

steamboat lines to secure passengers, who are thus exposed in the most

dangerous manner to these diseases.”

[Sidenote: Typhus Fever]

Second only to smallpox as a preventable disease, but of a more fatal

character, is typhus fever. Typhus is greatly aggravated by domestic

filth, and by overcrowding, with deficient ventilation. The inspectors

found and located by street and number no less than 2,000 cases of this

most contagious and fatal disease. Commencing in a large tenant-house

in Mulberry Street, it was traced from locality to locality, in the

poorer quarters, until it was found to have visited nearly every

section of the city. It became localized in many tenant-houses and

streets, where it still remains, causing a large amount of sickness and

mortality.

At Mulberry Street, in a notoriously filthy house, it has existed

for more than four years. This house has a population of about 320,

which is renewed every few months. During the period alluded to, there

have been no less than 60 deaths by fever in this single house, and

240 cases. To-day this fever is raging uncontrolled in that house,

creating more orphans than many well-fought battles. Every new family

which enters these infected quarters is sure to fall a victim to this

pestilential disease.

[Illustration: PLAN OF FEVER-NEST, EAST 17TH STREET, 1865

_Here 85 Cases of Typhus Occurred in One Season_]

The tenant-house No. -- East Seventeenth Street, which reaks with

filth, gives the same history; upward of 85 cases, with a large

percentage of deaths, occurred in this single house during the past

season. And still it remained unclean and open to new tenants. I

could mention scores of these houses in every part of the tenant-house

district where typhus has apparently taken up its abode, and from

whence it sends out in every direction its deadly streams.

Not only have single houses become centres of contagion, but this

fever has, in many instances, become localized in crowded streets,

which to-day are almost impassable on account of the heaps of garbage,

and the courts and alleys of which are reeking with filth, making

them great centres of pestilence. From many of these tenements whole

families have been swept away.

[Illustration: BIRD’S-EYE VIEW OF FEVER-NEST, 1865, NOT FAR FROM

BROADWAY AND FIFTH AVENUE]

Jersey Street, a short but uncleaned avenue, adjacent to a fashionable

part of Broadway, is another great depot of fever, which, according to

these records, frequently contained upward of thirty cases in progress

at one time. East Eleventh Street, between First and Second Avenues,

now, as all the past summer, in a horribly filthy condition, is a

local habitation of fever of the worst type. The same statement may be

made of nearly every district where the tenant-houses are especially

crowded, and the streets, courts, and alleys are unusually filthy.

[Sidenote: Intestinal Affections]

Intestinal diseases, as cholera infantum, diarrhoea, dysentery, typhoid

fever, etc., which arise from, or are intensely aggravated by the

emanations from putrescible material in streets, courts, and alleys,

or from cesspools, privies, drain pipes, sewers, etc., were prevalent

in the tenant-house districts, creating, as usual, a vast amount of

sickness, and a large infant mortality. Very generally these diseases

were directly traceable to the decomposing filth, and in some instances

were stopped by the removal of the nuisance.

The Inspector of the Eighth Ward reports: “Cholera infantum has

probably consigned many more to the grave during the past summer than

all other diseases in my inspection district. In every case examined I

have found it associated with some well-marked course of insalubrity;

vegetable and animal decomposition have been the most prominent causes.

That fifty per cent die from preventable causes in my inspection

district I do not doubt.”

The Inspector of the Sixth Ward says: “The mortality among children is

fearfully high, many families having lost all their children; others

four out of five or six.”

[Sidenote: Living at a Sewer’s Mouth]

[Illustration: PLAN OF MONROE STREET FEVER-NEST, 1865]

The Inspector of the Ninth Ward says he found among the people living

near the mouth of an open sewer: “That no less than twenty-nine cases

of dysentery and diarrhoea, five of which had terminated fatally, had

occurred during the three weeks immediately preceding his inspection.”

He adds: “Now, when we take into consideration the fact that there are

only twenty-two dwellings on this square (a considerable portion of it

being occupied by a large lumber-yard), and that all these cases had

occurred within a period of about twenty-one days, the ratio becomes

appalling. How many cases may have occurred subsequently, I have not

sought to ascertain, my time being fully occupied in the inspection of

the other parts of my district. But a still more direct and specific

action of the poisonous emanations proceeding from this obstructed

sewerage, manifested itself in the dwelling on the corner of West and

Gansevoort streets, which is in the closest proximity to the outlet

of the sewer. Here I learned, upon inquiry, that typhoid fever had

prevailed almost continuously during the preceding winter, and I found

three severe cases of dysentery at the time of my visit.”

But I will not occupy time with further details of the evidence which

this inspection furnishes of the vast accumulation of the causes of

unhealthiness which exist in New York, and of the wide prevalence of

contagious diseases arising therefrom or aggravated thereby.

The next point of inquiry is as to the effect of these conditions upon

the public health of the city. Our constituted health authorities

claim that notwithstanding this excessive concentration of the causes

of disease around and in the homes of half of our population, the

death-rate of New York is very low. To properly understand this

statement, we must inquire what is the rate of death from inevitable

causes.

[Sidenote: The Normal Death-Rate]

It has been estimated by careful writers on vital statistics that 17 in

1,000 living persons annually die from inevitable causes. That is, in a

community of 1,000 persons living under circumstances such that persons

die only from old age, cancer, casualties, etc., 17 will die annually,

and no more. And this number is the maximum that will die without

the occurrence of some disease due to a removable cause. Taking this

standard as the absolute necessary death-rate, we can readily estimate

the number of unnecessary or preventable deaths which occur in any

community.

Says the Registrar-General of England (Twentieth Annual Report): “Any

deaths in a people exceeding 17 in 1,000 annually are unnatural deaths.

If the people were shot, drowned, burnt, poisoned by strychnine,

their deaths would not be more unnatural than the deaths wrought

clandestinely by diseases in excess of the quota of natural death--that

is, in excess of seventeen in 1,000 living.”

[Sidenote: Death-Rate of New York]

Taking this as the standard, let us see how the death-rate of New

York compares with it. It is claimed by the city officials that

notwithstanding the vast accumulation of the universally-recognized

causes of disease, New York has a low death-rate. It is not reasonable

to suppose this statement true, nor is it true, as will presently

appear. It is stated very truly in the City Inspector’s Report for

1863, that “it is only by taking a connected view of a period of years

that a correct judgment can be formed of the state of health of a

city,” and upon this basis let us determine what is the mortality of

New York.

Take the 11 years preceding the last census, viz., 1860, excluding,

however, 1854, the year of the cholera. I select this period because it

includes the three last census returns, and it is only where we have

the census returns with the mortality records that we have accurate

data for our estimates. Now, the City Inspector’s own records (reports

of 1863, page 192) show that during the period referred to, the

death-rate of New York City was never below 28 in the 1,000, and twice

exceeded 40 in the 1,000, the average being as high as 33 in the 1,000.

These deductions are made directly from the City Inspector’s Reports,

and, as they are claimed to be infallible, these conclusions cannot be

controverted.

Now, when you remember that the highest death-rate fixed by sanitary

writers for inevitable deaths is 17 in 1,000, and that all deaths above

that standard are considered preventable, it is apparent what a fearful

sacrifice of life there is in New York. Estimated at the very minimum

death-rate of the last decennial period, viz.: 28 in 1,000, New York

annually lost 11 from preventable deaths in 1,000 of her population, or

upwards of 7,000 yearly, on an average, giving the enormous sum total

for this period of 77,000 preventable deaths.

It may be urged that cities never can attain to this standard of

healthfulness, but English writers maintain that the rate of 17 in the

1,000 is the true measure of the public health, and that even the most

populous towns may yet be brought up to it. Nor can we doubt that there

is much plausibility in the assertion, when we find the mortality in

Philadelphia fall to 18 in 1,000, and that of London gradually descend

from 30 in 1,000 to 22 in 1,000.

[Sidenote: New York, London, and Liverpool Compared]

It is maintained, also, that New York has a lower death-rate than

London or Philadelphia. Let us see how far this assertion is sustained

by the records of the health authorities of those cities. During the

decennial period preceding, but including 1860, and excluding 1854,

as in the former comparison, the minimum mortality in London was 20

in 1,000, the maximum 24 in 1,000, the mean about 22 in 1,000. These

figures are from the Registrar-General Reports.

The rate of mortality of Philadelphia for the same period was as

follows: Minimum 18 in 1,000, maximum 23 in 1,000, mean about 20 in

1,000. These figures are from the report of Dr. Jewell, long the able

Health Officer of that city. Placed in their proper relation, these

mortality statistics read as follows: The number of deaths to the 1,000

living for the ten years, 1850–60 inclusive, but exclusive of 1854, is

for

Min. Max. Av.

London 20 24 22

Philadelphia 18 23 20

New York 28 41 33

If, then, New York had as low an average death-rate as Philadelphia,

she would have saved 13 in 1,000 of her population during that period,

or in 1860, 10,577. These figures may seem excessive, but they are

careful deductions from the annual returns of the several cities.

And yet it is reiterated year after year by the City Inspector, that

“New York City, at this day, can lay claim to the privilege of being

numbered with the most healthy in the world.”

With what consummate justice did Dr. Jewell administer this withering

rebuke to our pretentious official. “It is unnecessary,” he says, in

his report of 1860, “to comment upon this extraordinary statement, when

the above figures contradict so positively the assertion. It is to be

regretted that the inspector had not availed himself of the above

statistical information, which would have obliged him to have presented

a widely different statement, although one indicating a more severe

pressure of sanitary evils, upon the health of their population, than

his report develops.”

[Sidenote: Constant Sickness]

But excessive as is this death-rate, it is not the full measure of the

penalty which we pay to the demon of filth. A high death-rate from the

diseases which it engenders or intensifies, always implies a large

amount of sickness. It is estimated by competent authority that there

are 28 cases of sickness for every death. On this basis of estimate

what an enormous amount of unnecessary sickness exists in our midst!

Nor is this a mere supposition. I have an accurate census of many

groups of families of that portion of our population who live immured

in filth, and here we find the constant sickness-rate excessive. It is

no uncommon thing to find it 50, 60, and 70 per cent.

[Sidenote: Where the Death Pressure Is Greatest]

I wish now to call your attention to the fact that great as is our

mortality and sickness rate, its excess is not equally distributed

over the entire population, but falls exclusively upon the poor and

helpless. One-half, at least, of the population of New York have a

death-rate no higher than the people of a healthy country town, while

the death pressure upon the other half is frightfully severe. For

example, the Seventeenth Ward, which is inhabited principally by the

wealthy class and has but few tenant-houses, has a death-rate of but 17

in 1,000, or only the death-rate from inevitable causes; but the Sixth

and Fourth Wards, which are occupied by the laboring classes, have a

death-rate varying from 36 to 40 in 1,000.

Thus it appears that while the average death-rate of the city is very

high, it is principally sustained by those Wards where the tenant-house

population is the most numerous. We find this excess of mortality just

where we found the causes of diseases existing most numerously. And

when we sift the matter further, we find that the excess of mortality

is not even equally distributed over these populous poor Wards, but

is concentrated upon individual tenant-houses. For example, while the

mortality of the Sixth Ward is nearly 40 in 1,000, the mortality of its

large tenant-houses is as high as 60 to 70 in 1,000. The following is a

recent census of a large but not exceptional tenant-house of that Ward:

Number of families in the house, 74; persons, 349; deaths, 18, or 53 in

1,000; constant sickness, 1 in 3; deaths of children, 1 in 6, or at the

rate of 16 in 1,000.

The following table illustrates the distribution of the mortality of

New York among the different classes of inhabitants at the last census:

Average mortality of entire city 28 in 1,000

Mortality of better class 10 to 17 “ “

Mortality of tenant-house 50 “ 60 “ “

[Sidenote: Some Scapegoats--Foreign Immigration]

But I should not do justice to this branch of inquiry without noticing

the alleged causes of the high mortality of New York. The first is

the large foreign immigration. The reliance to be placed upon that

scapegoat may be readily shown. Emigration occurs to this country under

two conditions: 1. The emigrant is driven from home by famine, in which

case the poorer class emigrate, or, 2, he is allured by advantages for

labor or business, when the middle classes principally emigrate.

Now, it is under the latter circumstances that emigration generally

takes place to the United States. This is seen in the vast sums of

money which the emigrants now annually bring, and the amounts which

they return to their friends as the result of their labor. This class

is always very hardy and healthy, as is proved by the small mortality

that occurs _in transitu_ being but 4.31 per cent for ten years.

Besides, we have the official statements of the Commissioners of

Emigration that but 3 per cent remain in the city.

[Illustration: A SIXTH WARD FEVER-NEST WITH DEATH-RATE OF 53 IN 1,000]

But the City Inspector himself shows the utter fallacy of this alleged

cause of excessive mortality in his report for 1860, in which he makes

the true explanation, and attributes to its proper cause whatever

increased mortality arises from emigrants. He says:

The City That Was · 第 4 / 8 段