There, then, is the doom we have reason to expect this Commission to

inflict on these temporarily turbulent wards of the Nation! First

order; then justice; then American civil rights, not for a class, or a

tribe, or a race, but for all the people; then local self-government.

But if your guests begin this task with the notion that they are the

first officials of a free people ever given such work, and must

therefore, American fashion, discover from the foundation for

themselves,--if they fancy nobody ever dealt with semi-civilized

Orientals till we stumbled on them in the Philippines,--they will waste

precious time in costly experiments, if not fail outright. It isn't

worth while thus to invent over again everything down to the very

alphabet of work among such people. We can afford to abate the

self-sufficiency of the almighty Yankee Nation enough to profit a

little by the lessons other people have learned in going over the road

before us.

From such lessons they will be sure to gather at once that if they now

show a trace of timidity or hesitation in their firm and just course,

because somebody has said something in Washington or on the stump, or

because there is an election coming on, they will fail.

In fact, if they do not know now, as well as they know what soil they

still stand on and what countrymen are about them, and if they do not

act as if they knew, that, no matter what the politicians or the

platforms say, and no matter what party comes into power, the American

people have at present no notion of throwing these islands away, or

abandoning them, or neglecting the care of them, they have not mastered

the plainest part of their problem, and must fail.

Above all, if there is a trace of politics in their work, or of seeking

for political effect at home, they will fail, and deserve to fail. In

this most delicate and difficult task before them there is no salvation

but in the scrupulous choice of the very best fitted agency available,

in each particular case, for the particular work in hand. If they

appoint one man, or encourage or silently submit to the appointment of

one man, to responsible place in their service among these islanders,

merely because he has been useful in politics at home, they will be

organizing failure and discredit in advance.

But they will do no such things. Not so has this body of men been

selected. Not such is the high appreciation of the opportunity offered

that has led you, Mr. President of the Commission, to abandon your

well-earned and distinguished place at home to begin a new career at

the antipodes. Yet more--I, at least, can certify to this company that

not such is the sense of public duty you inherited from your honored

father, and have consistently illustrated throughout your own career.

You will not fail, because you know the peril and the prize. You will

not fail, because you have civilization and law and ordered freedom,

the honor of your land and the happiness of a new one, in your

care--because you know that, for uncounted peoples, the hopes of future

years hang breathless on your fate. And so, gentlemen of the

Commission, good-by, and God-speed!

In spite of rock and tempest's roar,

In spite of false lights on the shore,

Sail on, nor fear to breast the sea!

APPENDICES

1. POWER TO ACQUIRE AND GOVERN TERRITORY.

2. THE TARIFF IN UNITED STATES TERRITORY.

3. THE RESOLUTIONS OF CONGRESS AS TO CUBA.

4. THE PROTOCOL OF WASHINGTON.

5. THE PEACE OF PARIS.

1

POWER TO ACQUIRE AND GOVERN TERRITORY

_The United States has as much power as any other Government._

"The Constitution of the United States established a Government, and

not a league, compact, or partnership.... As a Government it was

invested with all the attributes of sovereignty.... It is not only a

Government, but it is a National Government, and the only Government in

this country that has the character of nationality.... Such being the

character of the General Government, it seems to be a self-evident

proposition that it is invested with all those inherent and implied

powers which, at the time of adopting the Constitution, were generally

considered to belong to every Government as such, and as being

essential to the exercise of its functions." (Mr. Justice Bradley,

United States Supreme Court, Legal Tender Cases, 12 Wall. 554.)

_The United States can acquire territory by conquest or by treaty, as

a condition of peace or as indemnity._

"The United States ... may extend its boundaries by conquest or treaty,

and may demand the cession of territory as the condition of peace, in

order to indemnify its citizens for the injuries they have suffered, or

to reimburse the Government for the expenses of the war. But this can

only be done by the treaty-making power or the legislative authority."

(United States Supreme Court, Fleming _et al. v._ Page, 9 How. 614.)

_The United States can have a valid title by conquest to territory

not a part of the Union._

"By the laws and usages of nations, conquest is a valid title.... As

regarded by all other nations it [Tampico] was a part of the United

States, and belonged to them as exclusively as a Territory included in

our established boundaries, but yet it was not a part of the Union."

(United States Supreme Court, Fleming _et al. v._ Page, 9 How.

603-615.)

_A title so acquired by the United States cannot be questioned in its

courts._

"If those departments which are intrusted with the foreign intercourse

of the Nation ... have unequivocally asserted its rights of dominion

over a country of which it is in possession and which it claims under a

treaty, if the legislature has acted on the construction thus asserted,

it is not in its own courts that this construction is to be denied. A

question like this, respecting the boundaries of a nation, is ... more

a political than a legal question, and in its discussion the courts of

every country must respect the pronounced will of the legislature."

(Mr. Chief Justice Marshall, Foster _et al. v._ Neilson, 2 Peters 253,

309.)

_Yet such territory may be still outside the United States_ (meaning

thereby the American Union organized by the Constitution--the Nation),

_and cannot get in without action by the political authorities_.

"The boundaries of the United States, as they existed when war was

declared against Mexico, were not extended by the conquest.... They

remained unchanged. And every place which was out of the limits of the

United States, as previously established by the political authorities

of the Government, was still foreign." (Fleming _et al. v._ Page, 9

How. 616.)

_The United States can govern such territory as it pleases. Thus it

can withhold any power of local legislation._

"Possessing the power to erect a Territorial government for Alaska,

they could confer upon it such powers, judicial and executive, as they

deemed most suitable to the necessities of the inhabitants. It was

unquestionably within the constitutional power of Congress to withhold

from the inhabitants of Alaska the power to legislate and make laws. In

the absence, then, of any law-making power in the Territory, to what

source must the people look for the laws by which they are to be

governed? This question can admit of but one answer. Congress is the

only law-making power for Alaska." (United States _v._ Nelson, 29 Fed.

Rep. 202, 205, 206.)

_Mr. Jefferson even held that the United States could sell territory,

hold it as a colony, or regulate its commerce as it pleased._

"The Territory [Louisiana] was purchased by the United States in their

confederate capacity, and may be disposed of by them at their pleasure.

It is in the nature of a colony whose commerce may be regulated without

any reference to the Constitution." (And Louisiana was so governed for

years after the purchase, with different tariff requirements from those

of the United States, and without trial by jury in civil cases.)

_Again, the United States may even_ (as in the case of Consular Courts)

_withhold the right of trial by jury_.

"By the Constitution a government is ordained and established 'for the

United States of America,' and not for countries outside of their

limits. The guaranties it affords against accusation of capital or

infamous crimes, except by indictment or presentment by a grand jury,

and for an impartial trial by a jury when thus accused, apply only to

citizens and others within the United States, or who are brought there

for trial for alleged offenses committed elsewhere, and not to

residents or temporary sojourners abroad. The Constitution can have no

operation in another country." (_In re_ Ross, 140 U.S. 463, 465.) (In

this case the prisoner insisted that the refusal to allow him a trial

by jury was a fatal defect in the jurisdiction exercised by the court,

and rendered its judgment absolutely void.)

_The United States can govern such territory through Congress._

"At the time the Constitution was formed the limits of the territory

over which it was to operate were generally defined and recognized.

These States, this territory, and future States to be admitted into the

Union, are _the sole objects of the Constitution_. There is no express

provision whatever made in the Constitution for the acquisition or

government of territories beyond those limits. The right, therefore, of

acquiring territory is altogether incidental to the treaty-making

power, and perhaps to the power of admitting new States into the Union;

and the government of such acquisitions is, of course, left to the

legislative power of the Union, as far as that power is controlled by

treaty." (Mr. Justice Johnson of the Supreme Court, sitting in the

Circuit, in Am. Ins. Co. _v._ Canter, 1 Pet. 517.)

Mr. Chief Justice Marshall, affirming the above decision, says:

"Perhaps the power of governing a Territory belonging to the United

States which has not, by becoming a State, acquired the means of

self-government, may result necessarily from the facts that it is not

within the jurisdiction of any particular State, and is within the

power and jurisdiction of the United States. The right to govern may be

the inevitable consequence of the right to acquire territory. Whichever

may be the source whence the power is derived, the possession of it is

unquestioned." (1 Pet. 541, 542.)

_The General Government exercises a sovereignty independent of the

Constitution._

"Their people [in organized Territories] do not constitute a sovereign

power. All political authority exercised therein is derived [not from

the Constitution, but] from the General Government." (Snow _v._ United

States, 18 Wall. 317, 320.)

_The General Government is expected, however, to be controlled as to

personal and civil rights by the general principles of the Constitution._

"The personal and civil rights of the inhabitants of the Territories

are secured to them, as to other citizens, by the principles of

constitutional liberty which restrain all the agencies of government."

(Murphy _v._ Ramsay, 114 U.S. 15, 44, 45.)

"Doubtless Congress, in legislating for the Territories, would be

subject to those fundamental limitations in favor of personal rights

which are formulated in the Constitution and its amendments; but these

limitations would exist rather by inference and the general spirit of

the Constitution, from which Congress derives all its powers, than by

any express and direct application of its provisions." (Mormon Church

_v._ United States, 136 U.S. 1, 44; Thompson _v._ Utah, 170 U.S. 343,

349.)

2

THE TARIFF IN UNITED STATES TERRITORY

The one point at which the opponents of the doctrine that Congress can

govern the Territories as it pleases are able to make a prima facie

case by quoting a decision of the Supreme Court, is as to the

application of the United States tariff to the Territories. When

California was acquired, but before Congress had acted or a Collection

District had been established, the Supreme Court sustained the demand

for duties under the United States tariff on goods landed at California

ports (Cross _v._ Harrison, 16 How. 164). Mr. Justice Wayne said:

"By the ratifications of the treaty California became a part of the

United States. And as there is nothing differently stipulated in the

treaty with respect to commerce, it became instantly bound and

privileged by the laws which Congress had passed to raise a revenue

from duties on imports and tonnage.... The right claimed to land

foreign goods within the United States at any place out of a Collection

District, if allowed, would be a violation of that provision in the

Constitution which enjoins that all duties, imposts, and excises shall

be uniform throughout the United States."

The court here bases its reasoning distinctly on the treaty by which

California was acquired. But that treaty gave the pledge that

California (an adjacent Territory) should be incorporated into the

American Union. The Treaty of Paris gave no such pledge as to the

Philippines (not adjacent territory, but nine thousand miles away),

could not in the nature of the case have given such a pledge, and did

provide, instead, that the whole question of the civil rights and

political status of the native inhabitants should be determined by the

Congress. Recalling Mr. Justice Story's remark that in a Constitution

"there ought to be a capacity to provide for future contingencies as

they may happen, and as these are ... illimitable in their nature, so

it is impossible safely to limit that capacity," it would seem that

there would certainly be elasticity enough in the Constitution, or

common sense enough in its interpretation, to permit the Supreme Court

to perceive some difference between a requirement of uniform tariff on

this continent over a territory specifically acquired in order to be

made a State, and such a requirement on the other side of the globe

over territory not so acquired. The case becomes stronger when the

treaty (also constitutionally a part of the Supreme Law of the land)

turns over the political status of the latter territory entirely to

Congress.

The Constitution makes the same or similar requirements of uniformity

throughout the United States as to the tariff, internal taxes, courts,

and the right of trial by jury. But in every case the early practice

did not construe this to include the Territories.

_As to uniformity in tariff._ It was not enforced rigidly in Louisiana

for years. So little, in fact, was it then held that Louisiana, as

soon as acquired, became an integral part of the United States

(notwithstanding the treaty provision that in time it should), that

though the directors of the United States Bank were empowered to

establish offices of discount and deposit "wheresoever they shall

think fit _within the United States_," they did not consider this a

warrant for establishing one in New Orleans, and actually secured from

the Congress for that purpose a bill, signed by Thomas Jefferson on

March 23, 1804, extending their authority, under the terms of their

original charter, to "any part of the Territories or dependencies of

the United States."

_As to uniformity in internal taxes._ The very first levied in the

United States, that of March 3, 1791, omitted the Territories

altogether, dividing the United States into fourteen Collection

Districts, "each consisting of one State." It is not until 1798 that

any trace can be found of a collection of internal revenue in the

territory northwest of the Ohio.

_As to the courts._ The Constitution requires that the judicial

officers of the United States shall hold office during good behavior.

For a century the judicial officers of Territories have been restricted

to fixed terms of office.

_As to trial by jury._ The Constitution gives the right to it to every

criminal case in the United States, and to every civil case involving

over twenty dollars. Under Mr. Jefferson's government of Louisiana,

trial by jury was limited to capital cases in criminal prosecutions. It

has likewise been denied in Consular Courts.

3

THE RESOLUTIONS OF CONGRESS AS TO CUBA

Adopted by Congress, April 19, 1898: by the Senate at 1:38 A.M.,

42 to 35; by the House at 2:40 A.M., 311 to 6.

WHEREAS, The abhorrent conditions which have existed for more than

three years in the island of Cuba, so near our own borders, have

shocked the moral sense of the people of the United States, have been a

disgrace to Christian civilization,--culminating, as they have, in the

destruction of a United States battle-ship, with two hundred and sixty

of its officers and crew, while on a friendly visit in the harbor of

Havana,--and cannot longer be endured, as has been set forth by the

President of the United States in his message to Congress of April 11,

1898, upon which the action of Congress was invited; therefore be it

resolved,

_First_, That the people of the island of Cuba are, and of right ought

to be, free and independent.

_Second_, That it is the duty of the United States to demand, and the

Government of the United States does hereby demand, that the Government

of Spain at once relinquish its authority and government in the island

of Cuba and withdraw its land and naval forces from Cuba and Cuban

waters.

_Third_, That the President of the United States be, and he hereby is,

directed and empowered to use the entire land and naval forces of the

United States, and to call into the actual service of the United States

the militia of the several States to such an extent as may be necessary

to carry these resolutions into effect.

_Fourth_, That the United States hereby disclaims any disposition or

intention to exercise sovereignty, jurisdiction, or control over said

island, except for the pacification thereof, and asserts its

determination when that is accomplished to leave the government and

control of the island to its people.

4

THE PROTOCOL OF WASHINGTON

William R. Day, Secretary of State of the United States, and His

Excellency Jules Cambon, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary

of the Republic of France at Washington, respectively possessing for

this purpose full authority from the Government of the United States

and the Government of Spain, have concluded and signed the following

articles, embodying the terms on which the two Governments have agreed

in respect to the matters hereinafter set forth, having in view the

establishment of peace between the two countries, that is to say:

ARTICLE I

Spain will relinquish all claim of sovereignty over and title to Cuba.

ARTICLE II

Spain will cede to the United States the island of Porto Rico and other

islands now under Spanish sovereignty in the West Indies, and also an

island in the Ladrones to be selected by the United States.

ARTICLE III

The United States will occupy and hold the city, bay, and harbor of

Manila, pending the conclusion of a treaty of peace which shall

determine the control, disposition, and government of the Philippines.

ARTICLE IV

Spain will immediately evacuate Cuba, Porto Rico, and other islands now

under Spanish sovereignty in the West Indies; and to this end each

Government will, within ten days after the signing of this protocol,

appoint Commissioners, and the Commissioners so appointed shall, within

thirty days after the signing of this protocol, meet at Havana for the

purpose of arranging and carrying out the details of the aforesaid

evacuation of Cuba and the adjacent Spanish islands; and each

Government will, within ten days after the signing of this protocol,

also appoint other Commissioners, who shall, within thirty days after

the signing of this protocol, meet at San Juan, in Porto Rico, for the

purpose of arranging and carrying out the details of the aforesaid

evacuation of Porto Rico and other islands now under Spanish

sovereignty in the West Indies.

ARTICLE V

The United States and Spain will each appoint not more than five

Commissioners to treat of peace, and the Commissioners so appointed

shall meet at Paris not later than October 1, 1898, and proceed to the

negotiation and conclusion of a treaty of peace, which treaty shall be

subject to ratification according to the respective constitutional

forms of the two countries.

ARTICLE VI

Upon the conclusion and signing of this protocol, hostilities between

the two countries shall be suspended, and notice to that effect shall

be given as soon as possible by each Government to the commanders of

its military and naval forces.

Done at Washington in duplicate, in English and in French, by the

undersigned, who have hereunto set their hands and seals the twelfth

day of August, 1898.

(Seal) WILLIAM R. DAY.

(Seal) JULES CAMBON.

5

THE PEACE OF PARIS

Negotiations begun in Paris, October 1, 1898. Treaty signed in

Paris, 8:45 P.M., December 10. Delivered by United States

Commissioners to the President, December 24; transmitted to the

Senate with the official report of the negotiations, January 4,

1899; ratified by Senate in executive session, February 6, by a

vote of 57 against 27. Formal exchange of ratifications at

Washington, April 11. Twenty millions paid through Jules Cambon,

May 1. Treaty ratified by Spanish Senate, July 3, 1899.

The United States of America and Her Majesty the Queen Regent of Spain,

in the name of her august son, Don Alfonso XIII, desiring to end the

state of war now existing between the two countries, have for that

purpose appointed as plenipotentiaries:

_The President of the United States,_

William R. Day, Cushman K. Davis, William P. Frye, George Gray, and

Whitelaw Reid, citizens of the United States;

_And Her Majesty the Queen Regent of Spain,_

Don Eugenio Montero Rios, President of the Senate; Don Buenaventura de

Abarzuza, Senator of the Kingdom and ex-Minister of the Crown; Don Jose

de Garnica, Deputy to the Cortes and Associate Justice of the Supreme

Court; Don Wenceslao Ramirez de Villa Urrutia, Envoy Extraordinary and

Minister Plenipotentiary at Brussels; and Don Rafael Cerero, General of

Division;

* * * * *

Who, having assembled in Paris and having exchanged their full powers,

which were found to be in due and proper form, have, after discussion

of the matters before them, agreed upon the following articles:

* * * * *

Article I. Spain relinquishes all claim of sovereignty over and title

to Cuba.

And as the island is, upon its evacuation by Spain, to be occupied by

the United States, the United States will, so long as such occupation

shall last, assume and discharge the obligations that may under

international law result from the fact of its occupation for the

protection of life and property.

Article II. Spain cedes to the United States the island of Porto Rico

and other islands now under Spanish sovereignty in the West Indies, and

the island of Guam, in the Marianas or Ladrones.

Article III. Spain cedes to the United States the archipelago known as

the Philippine Islands, and comprehending the islands lying within the

following lines:

Problems of Expansion As Considered in Papers and Addresses · 第 13 / 14 段