IRISH WIT AND HUMOR

By Charles L. Graves.

No record of the glories of Ireland would be complete without an

effort, however inadequate, to analyze and illustrate her wit and

humor. Often misunderstood, misrepresented, and misinterpreted, they

are nevertheless universally admitted to be racial traits, and for an

excellent reason. Other nations exhibit these qualities in their

literature, and Ireland herself is rich in writers who have furnished

food for mirth. But her special pre-eminence resides in the

possession of what, to adapt a famous phrase, may be called an _anima

naturaliter jocosa_. Irish wit and Irish humor are a national

inheritance. They are inherent in the race as a whole, independent of

education or culture or comfort. The best Irish sayings are the

sayings of the people; the greatest Irish humorists are the nameless

multitude who have never written books or found a place in national

dictionaries of biography. None but an Irishman could have coined

that supreme expression of contempt: "I wouldn't be seen dead with

him at a pig-fair," or rebuked a young barrister because he did not

"squandher his carcass" (_i.e._, gesticulate) enough. But we cannot

trace the paternity of these sayings any more than we can that of the

lightning retort of the man to whom one of the "quality" had given a

glass of whisky. "That's made another man of you, Patsy," remarked

the donor. "'Deed an' it has, sor," Patsy flashed back, "an' that

other man would be glad of another glass." It is enough for our

purpose to note that such sayings are typically Irish and that their

peculiar felicity consists in their combining both wit and humor.

To what element in the Irish nature are we to attribute this joyous

and illuminating gift? No one who is not a Gaelic scholar can venture

to dogmatize on this thorny subject. But, setting philology and

politics aside, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that Ireland has

gained rather than lost in this respect by the clash of races and

languages. Gaiety, we are told, is not the predominating

characteristic of the Celtic temperament, nor is it reflected in the

prose and verse of the "old ancient days" that have come down to us.

Glamour and magic and passion abound in the lays and legends of the

ancient Gael, but there is more melancholy than mirth in these tales

of long ago. Indeed, it is interesting to note in connection with

this subject that the younger school of Irish writers associated with

what is called the Celtic Renascence have, with very few exceptions,

sedulously eschewed anything approaching to jocosity, preferring the

paths of crepuscular mysticism or sombre realism, and openly avowing

their distaste for what they consider to be the denationalized

sentiment of Moore, Lever, and Lover. To say this is not to disparage

the genius of Yeats and Synge; it is merely a statement of fact and

an illustration of the eternal dualism of the Irish temperament,

which Moore himself realized when he wrote of "Erin, the tear and the

smile in thine eye."

A reaction against the Donnybrook tradition was inevitable and to a

great extent wholesome, since the stage Irishman of the transpontine

drama or the music-halls was for the most part a gross and unlovely

caricature, but, like all reactions, it has tended to obscure the

real merits and services of those who showed the other side of the

medal. Lever did not exaggerate more than Dickens, and his portraits

of Galway fox-hunters and duellists, of soldiers of fortune, and of

Dublin undergraduates were largely based on fact. At his best he was

a most exhilarating companion, and his pictures of Irish life, if

partial, were not misleading. He held no brief for the landlords, and

in his later novels showed a keen sense of their shortcomings. The

plain fact is that, in considering the literary glories of Ireland,

we cannot possibly overlook the work of those Irishmen who were

affected by English influences or wrote for an English audience.

Anglo-Irish humorous literature was a comparatively late product, but

its efflorescence was rapid and triumphant. The first great name is

that of Goldsmith, and, though deeply influenced in technique and

choice of subjects by his association with English men of letters and

by his residence in England, in spirit he remained Irish to the

end--generous, impulsive, and improvident in his life; genial, gay,

and tender-hearted in his works. The Vicar of Wakefield was Dr.

Primrose, but he might just as well have been called Dr. Shamrock. No

surer proof of the pre-eminence of Irish wit and humor can be found

than in the fact that, Shakespeare alone excepted, no writers of

comedy have held the boards longer or more triumphantly than

Goldsmith and his brother Irishman, Sheridan. _She Stoops to Conquer,

The Rivals, The School for Scandal_, and _The Critic_ represent the

sunny side of the Irish genius to perfection. They illustrate, in the

most convincing way possible, how the debt of the world to Ireland

has been increased by the fate which ordained that her choicest

spirits should express themselves in a language of wider appeal than

the ancient speech of Erin.

On the other hand, English literature and the English tongue have

gained greatly from the influence exerted by writers familiar from

their childhood with turns of speech and modes of expression which,

even when they are not translations from the Gaelic, are

characteristic of the Hibernian temper. The late Dr. P.W. Joyce, in

his admirable treatise on English as spoken in Ireland, has

illustrated not only the essentially bilingual character of the

Anglo-Irish dialect, but the modes of thought which it enshrines.

There is no better known form of Irish humor than that commonly

called the "Irish bull," which is too often set down to lax thinking

and faulty logic. But it is the rarest thing to encounter a genuine

Irish "bull" which is not picturesque and at the same time highly

suggestive. Take, for example, the saying of an old Kerry doctor who,

when conversing with a friend on the high rate of mortality,

observed, "Bedad, there's people dyin' who never died before." Here a

truly illuminating result was attained by the simple device of using

the indicative for the conditional mood--as in Juvenal's famous

comment on Cicero's second Philippic: _Antoni gladios potuit

contemnere si sic omnia dixisset_. The Irish "bull" is a heroic and

sometimes successful attempt to sit upon two stools at once, or, as

an Irishman put it, "Englishmen often make 'bulls,' but the Irish

'bull' is always pregnant."

Though no names of such outstanding distinction as those of Goldsmith

and Sheridan occur in the early decades of the nineteenth century,

the spirit of Irish comedy was kept vigorously alive by Maria

Edgeworth, William Maginn, Francis Mahony (Father Prout), and William

Carleton. Sir Walter Scott's splendid tribute to the genius of Maria

Edgeworth is regarded by some critics as extravagant, but it is

largely confirmed in a most unexpected quarter. Turgenief, the great

Russian novelist, proclaimed himself her disciple, and has left it on

record that but for her example he might never have attempted to give

literary form to his impressions of the classes in Russia

corresponding to the poor Irish and the squireens and the squires of

county Longford. Maginn and Mahony were both scholars--the latter

happily called himself "an Irish potato seasoned with Attic

salt"--wrote largely for English periodicals, and spent most of their

lives out of Ireland. In the writings of all three an element of the

grotesque is observable, tempered, however, in the case of Mahony,

with a vein of tender pathos which emerges in his delightful "Bells

of Shandon." Maginn was a wit, Mahony was the hedge-schoolmaster _in

excelsis_, and Carleton was the first realist in Irish peasant

fiction. But all alike drew their best inspiration from essentially

Irish themes. The pendulum has swung back slowly but steadily since

the days when Irish men of letters found it necessary to accommodate

their genius to purely English literary standards. Even Lever, though

he wrote for the English public, wrote mainly about Ireland. So, too,

with his contemporary Le Fanu, whose reputation rests on a double

basis. He made some wonderful excursions into the realm of the

bizarre, the uncanny, and the gruesome. But in the collection known

as _The Purcell Papers_ will be found three short stories which for

exuberant drollery and "diversion" have never been excelled. That the

same man could have written _Uncle Silas_ and _The Quare Gander_ is

yet another proof of the strange dualism of the Irish character.

The record of the last fifty years shows an uninterrupted progress in

the invasion of English _belles lettres_ by Irish writers. Outside

literature, perhaps the most famous sayer of good things of our times

was a simple Irish parish priest, the late Father Healy. Of his

humorous sayings the number is legion; his wit may be illustrated by

a less familiar example--his comment on a very tall young lady named

Lynch: "Nature gave her an inch and she took an ell." In the House of

Commons today there is no greater master of irony and sardonic humor

than his namesake, Mr. Tim Healy. On one occasion he remarked that

Lord Rosebery was not a man to go tiger-shooting with--except at the

Zoo. On another, being anxious to bring an indictment against the

"Castle" _régime_ in Dublin and finding the way blocked by a debate

on Uganda, he successfully accomplished his purpose by a judicious

geographical transference of names, and convulsed the House by a

speech in which the nomenclature of Central Africa was applied to the

government of Ireland.

But wit and humor are the monopoly of no class or calling in Ireland.

They flourish alike among car-drivers and K.C.'s, publicans and

policemen, priests and parsons, beggars and peers. It is a

commonplace of criticism to deny these qualities in their highest

form to women. But this is emphatically untrue of Ireland, and was

never more conclusively disproved than by the recent literary

achievements of her daughters. The partnership of two Irish ladies,

Miss Edith Somerville and Miss Violet Martin, has given us, in _Some

Experiences of an Irish R.M._ (_i.e._, Resident Magistrate), the most

delicious comedy, and in _The Real Charlotte_ the finest

tragi-comedy, that have come out of Great Britain in the last thirty

years. The _R.M._, as it is familiarly called, is already a classic,

but the Irish _comédie humaine_--to use the phrase in the sense of

Balzac--is even more vividly portrayed in the pages of _The Real

Charlotte_. Humor, genuine though intermittent, irradiates the

autumnal talent of Miss Jane Barlow, and the long roll of gifted

Irishwomen who have contributed to the gaiety of nations may be

closed with the names of Miss Hunt, author of _Folk Tales of

Breffny_; of Miss Purdon and Miss Winifred Letts, who in prose and

verse, respectively, have moved us to tears and laughter by their

studies of Leinster peasant life; and of "Moira O'Neill" (Mrs.

Skrine), the incomparable singer of the Glens of Antrim. To give a

full list of the living Irish writers, male and female, who are

engaged in the benevolent work of driving dull care away would be

impossible within the space at our command. But we cannot end without

recognition of the exhilarating extravaganzas of "George A.

Birmingham" (Canon Hannay), the freakish and elfin muse of James

Stephens, and the coruscating wit of F.P. Dunne, the famous

Irish-American humorist, whose "Mr. Dooley" is a household word on

both sides of the Atlantic.

The Glories of Ireland · 第 85 / 97 题