A SLIP UNDER THE MICROSCOPE

Outside the laboratory windows was a watery grey fog, and within a close

warmth and the yellow light of the green-shaded gas lamps that stood two

to each table down its narrow length. On each table stood a couple of

glass jars containing the mangled vestiges of the crayfish, mussels,

frogs, and guinea-pigs, upon which the students had been working, and

down the side of the room, facing the windows, were shelves bearing

bleached dissections in spirit, surmounted by a row of beautifully

executed anatomical drawings in white wood frames and overhanging a row

of cubical lockers. All the doors of the laboratory were panelled with

blackboard, and on these were the half-erased diagrams of the previous

day’s work. The laboratory was empty, save for the demonstrator, who sat

near the preparation-room door, and silent, save for a low, continuous

murmur, and the clicking of the rocker microtome at which he was

working. But scattered about the room were traces of numerous students:

hand-bags, polished boxes of instruments, in one place a large drawing

covered by newspaper, and in another a prettily bound copy of “News from

Nowhere,” a book oddly at variance with its surroundings. These things

had been put down hastily as the students had arrived and hurried at

once to secure their seats in the adjacent lecture-theatre. Deadened by

the closed door, the measured accents of the professor sounded as a

featureless muttering.

Presently, faint through the closed windows came the sound of the

Oratory clock striking the hour of eleven. The clicking of the microtome

ceased, and the demonstrator looked at his watch, rose, thrust his hands

into his pockets, and walked slowly down the laboratory towards the

lecture-theatre door. He stood listening for a moment, and then his eye

fell on the little volume by William Morris. He picked it up, glanced at

the title, smiled, opened it, looked at the name on the fly-leaf, ran

the leaves through with his hand, and put it down. Almost immediately

the even murmur of the lecturer ceased, there was a sudden burst of

pencils rattling on the desks in the lecture-theatre, a stirring, a

scraping of feet, and a number of voices speaking together. Then a firm

footfall approached the door, which began to open, and stood ajar, as

some indistinctly heard question arrested the new-comer.

The demonstrator turned, walked slowly back past the microtome and left

the laboratory by the preparation-room door. As he did so, first one,

and then several students carrying note-books, entered the laboratory

from the lecture-theatre, and distributed themselves among the little

tables, or stood in a group about the doorway. They were an

exceptionally heterogeneous assembly,—for while Oxford and Cambridge

still recoil from the blushing prospect of mixed classes, the College of

Science anticipated America in the matter years ago,—mixed socially,

too, for the prestige of the College is high, and its scholarships, free

of any age limit, dredge deeper even than do those of the Scotch

universities. The class numbered one and twenty, but some remained in

the theatre questioning the professor, copying the blackboard diagrams

before they were washed off, or examining the special specimens he had

produced to illustrate the day’s teaching. Of the nine who had come into

the laboratory, three were girls, one of whom, a little fair woman

wearing spectacles and dressed in greyish green, was peering out of the

window at the fog, while the other two, both wholesome-looking,

plain-faced school-girls, unrolled and put on the brown holland aprons

they wore while dissecting. Of the men, two went down the laboratory and

sat down in their places, one a pallid, dark-bearded man who had once

been a tailor, the other a pleasant-featured, ruddy young man of twenty,

dressed in a well-fitting brown suit, young Wedderburn, the son of

Wedderburn the eye-specialist. The others formed a little knot near the

theatre door. One of these, a dwarfed, spectacled figure with a hunch

back, sat on a bent wood stool, two others, one a short, dark youngster,

and the other a flaxen-haired, reddish-complexioned young man, stood

leaning side by side against the slate sink, while the fourth stood

facing them and maintained the larger share of the conversation.

This last person was named Hill. He was a sturdily built young fellow of

the same age as Wedderburn, he had a white face, dark grey eyes, hair of

an indeterminate colour, and prominent, irregular features. He talked

rather louder than was needful, and thrust his hands deeply into his

pockets. His collar was frayed and blue with the starch of a careless

laundress, his clothes were evidently ready-made, and there was a patch

on the side of his boot near the toe. And as he talked or listened to

the others, he glanced now and again towards the lecture-theatre door.

They were discussing the depressing peroration of the lecture they had

just heard, the last lecture it was in the introductory course in

Zoölogy. “From ovum to ovum is the goal of the higher vertebrata,” the

lecturer had said in his melancholy tones, and so had neatly rounded off

the sketch of comparative anatomy he had been developing. The spectacled

hunchback had repeated it, with noisy appreciation, had tossed it

towards the fair-haired student with an evident provocation, and had

started one of those vague, rambling discussions on generalities so

unaccountably dear to the student mind all the world over.

“That is our goal, perhaps,—I admit it,—as far as science goes,” said

the fair-haired student, rising to the challenge. “But there are things

above science.”

“Science,” said Hill, confidently, “is systematic knowledge. Ideas that

don’t come into the system must anyhow—be loose ideas.” He was not quite

sure whether that was a clever saying or a fatuity, until his hearers

took it seriously.

“The thing I cannot understand,” said the hunchback, at large, “is

whether Hill is a materialist or not.”

“There is one thing above matter,” said Hill, promptly, feeling he had a

better thing this time, aware too of some one in the doorway behind him,

and raising his voice a trifle for her benefit, “and that is—the

delusion that there is something above matter.”

“So we have your gospel at last,” said the fair-haired student. “It’s

all a delusion, is it? All our aspirations to lead something more than

dogs’ lives, all our work for anything beyond ourselves. But see how

inconsistent you are! Your socialism, for instance. Why do you trouble

about the interests of the race? Why do you concern yourself about the

beggar in the gutter? Why are you bothering yourself to lend that

book”—he indicated William Morris by a movement of the head—“to every

one in the lab?”

“Girl,” said the hunchback, indistinctly, and glanced guiltily over his

shoulder.

The girl in brown, with the brown eyes, had come into the laboratory,

and stood on the other side of the table behind him with her rolled-up

apron in one hand, looking over her shoulder, listening to the

discussion. She did not notice the hunchback, because she was glancing

from Hill to his interlocutor. Hill’s consciousness of her presence

betrayed itself to her only in his studious ignorance of the fact; but

she understood that and it pleased her. “I see no reason,” said he, “why

a man should live like a brute because he knows of nothing beyond

matter, and does not expect to exist a hundred years hence.”

“Why shouldn’t he?” said the fair-haired student.

“Why _should_ he?” said Hill.

“What inducement has he?”

“That’s the way with all you religious people. It’s all a business of

inducements. Cannot a man seek after righteousness for righteousness’

sake?”

There was a pause. The fair man answered with a kind of vocal padding,

“But—you see—inducement—when I said inducement—” to gain time. And then

the hunchback came to his rescue and inserted a question. He was a

terrible person in the debating society with his questions, and they

invariably took one form,—a demand for a definition. “What’s your

definition of righteousness?” said the hunchback, at this stage.

Hill experienced a sudden loss of complacency at this question, but even

as it was asked, relief came in the person of Brooks, the laboratory

attendant, who entered by the preparation-room door, carrying a number

of freshly-killed guinea-pigs by their hind-legs. “This is the last

batch of material this session,” said the youngster who had not

previously spoken. Brooks advanced up the laboratory, smacking down a

couple of guinea-pigs at each table, and the discussion perished

abruptly as the students who were not already in their places hurried to

them to secure the choice of a specimen. There was a noise of keys

rattling on split rings as lockers were opened, and dissecting

instruments taken out. Hill was already standing by his table, and his

box of scalpels was sticking out of his pocket. The girl in brown came a

step towards him, and leaning over his table, said softly, “Did you see

that I returned your book, Mr. Hill?”

During the whole scene, she and the book had been vividly present in his

consciousness, but he made a clumsy pretence of looking at the book and

seeing it for the first time. “Oh, yes,” he said, taking it up. “I see.

Did you like it?”

“I want to ask you some questions about it—sometime.”

“Certainly,” said Hill. “I shall be glad.” He stopped awkwardly. “You

liked it?” he said.

“It’s a wonderful book. Only some things I don’t understand.”

Then suddenly the laboratory was hushed by a curious braying noise. It

was the demonstrator. He was at the blackboard ready to begin the day’s

instruction, and it was his custom to demand silence by a sound midway

between the “Er” of common intercourse, and the blast of a trumpet. The

girl in brown slipped back to her place, it was immediately in front of

Hill’s, and Hill, forgetting her forthwith, took a note-book out of the

drawer of his table, turned over its leaves hastily, drew a stumpy

pencil from his pocket, and prepared to make a copious note of the

coming demonstration. For demonstrations and lectures are the sacred

text of the College students. Books, saving only the professor’s own,

you may—it is even expedient to—ignore.

Hill was the son of a Landport cobbler, and had been hooked by a chance

blue paper the authorities had thrown out to the Landport Technical

College. He kept himself in London on his allowance of a guinea a week,

and found that with proper care this also covered his clothing

allowance, an occasional waterproof collar, that is, and ink and needles

and cotton and such-like necessaries for a man about town. This was his

first year and his first session, but the brown old man in Landport had

already got himself detested in many public-houses by boasting of his

son “the professor.” Hill was a vigorous youngster, with a serene

contempt for the clergy of all denominations, and a fine ambition to

reconstruct the world. He regarded his scholarship as a brilliant

opportunity. He had begun to read at seven, and had read steadily

whatever came in his way, good or bad, since then. His worldly

experience had been limited to the Island of Portsea, and acquired

chiefly in the wholesale boot factory in which he had worked by day,

after passing the seventh standard of the Board School. He had a

considerable gift of speech, as the College Debating Society, which met

amidst the crushing machines and mine models in the Metallurgical

Theatre downstairs, already recognised, recognised by a violent

battering of desks whenever he rose. And he was just at that fine

emotional age when life opens at the end of a narrow pass, like a broad

valley at one’s feet, full of the promise of wonderful discoveries and

tremendous achievements. And his own limitations, save that he knew that

he knew neither Latin or French, were all unknown to him.

At first his interest had been divided pretty equally between his

biological work at the College and social and theological theorising, an

employment which he took in deadly earnest. Of a night, when the big

museum library was not open, he would sit on the bed of his room in

Chelsea with his coat and a muffler on, and write out the lecture notes

and revise his dissection memoranda until Thorpe called him out by a

whistle,—the landlady objected to open the door to attic visitors,—and

then the two would go prowling about the shadowy, shiny, gas-lit

streets, talking, very much in the fashion of the sample just given, of

the God Idea and Righteousness and Carlyle and the Reorganisation of

Society. And in the midst of it all, Hill, arguing not only for Thorpe

but for the casual passer-by, would lose the thread of his argument,

glancing at some pretty, painted face that looked meaningly at him as he

passed. Science and Righteousness! But once or twice lately there had

been signs that a third interest was creeping into his life, and he had

found his attention wandering from the fate of the mesoblastic somites

or the probable meaning of the blastopore, to the thought of the girl

with the brown eyes who sat at the table before him.

She was a paying student; she descended inconceivable social altitudes

to speak to him. At the thought of the education she must have had and

the accomplishments she must possess, the soul of Hill became abject

within him. She had spoken to him first over a difficulty about the

alisphenoid of a rabbit’s skull, and he had found that, in biology at

least, he had no reason for self-abasement. And from that, after the

manner of young people starting from any starting-point, they got to

generalities, and while Hill attacked her upon the question of

socialism,—some instinct told him to spare her a direct assault upon her

religion,—she was gathering resolution to undertake what she told

herself was his æsthetic education. She was a year or two older than he,

though the thought never occurred to him. The loan of “News from

Nowhere” was the beginning of a series of cross loans. Upon some absurd

first principle of his, Hill had never “wasted time” upon poetry, and it

seemed an appalling deficiency to her. One day in the lunch hour, when

she chanced upon him alone in the little museum where the skeletons were

arranged, shamefully eating the bun that constituted his midday meal,

she retreated and returned, to lend him, with a slightly furtive air, a

volume of Browning. He stood sideways towards her and took the book

rather clumsily, because he was holding the bun in the other hand. And

in the retrospect his voice lacked the cheerful clearness he could have

wished.

That occurred after the examination in comparative anatomy, on the day

before the College turned out its students and was carefully locked up

by the officials, for the Christmas holidays. The excitement of cramming

for the first trial of strength had for a little while dominated Hill to

the exclusion of his other interests. In the forecasts of the result in

which every one indulged, he was surprised to find that no one regarded

him as a possible competitor for the Harvey Commemoration Medal, of

which this and the two subsequent examinations disposed. It was about

this time that Wedderburn, who so far had lived inconspicuously on the

uttermost margin of Hill’s perceptions, began to take on the appearance

of an obstacle. By a mutual agreement the nocturnal prowlings with

Thorpe ceased for the three weeks before the examination, and his

landlady pointed out that she really could not supply so much lamp-oil

at the price. He walked to and fro from the College with little slips of

mnemonics in his hand, lists of crayfish appendages, rabbits’

skull-bones, and vertebrate nerves, for example, and became a positive

nuisance to foot-passengers in the opposite direction.

But by a natural reaction Poetry and the girl with the brown eyes ruled

the Christmas holiday. The pending results of the examination became

such a secondary consideration that Hill marvelled at his father’s

excitement. Even had he wished it, there was no comparative anatomy to

read in Landport, and he was too poor to buy books, but the stock of

poets in the library was extensive and Hill’s attack was magnificently

sustained. He saturated himself with the fluent numbers of Longfellow

and Tennyson, and fortified himself with Shakespeare, found a kindred

soul in Pope and a master in Shelley, and heard and fled the siren

voices of Eliza Cook and Mrs. Hemans. But he read no more Browning,

because he hoped for the loan of other volumes from Miss Haysman when he

returned to London.

He walked from his lodgings to the College with that volume of Browning

in his shiny black bag, and his mind teeming with the finest general

propositions about poetry. Indeed he framed first this little speech and

then that with which to grace the return. The morning was an

exceptionally pleasant one for London, there was a clear, hard frost and

undeniable blue in the sky, a thin haze softened every outline, and warm

shafts of sunlight struck between the houseblocks and turned the sunny

side of the street to amber and gold. In the hall of the College he

pulled off his glove and signed his name with fingers so stiff with cold

that the characteristic dash under the signature he cultivated became a

quivering line. He imagined Miss Haysman about him everywhere. He turned

at the staircase, and there, below, he saw a crowd struggling at the

foot of the notice board. This, possibly, was the biology list. He

forgot Browning and Miss Haysman for the moment, and joined the

scrimmage. And at last with his cheek flattened against the sleeve of

the man on the step above him, he read the list:

“_Class I._

H. J. SOMERS WEDDERBURN.

WILLIAM HILL.”

And thereafter followed a second class that is outside our present

sympathies. It was characteristic that he did not trouble to look for

Thorpe on the Physics list, but backed out of the struggle at once, and

in a curious emotional state between pride over common second-class

humanity and acute disappointment at Wedderburn’s success, went on his

way upstairs. At the top, as he was hanging up his coat in the passage,

the zoölogical demonstrator, a young man from Oxford, who secretly

regarded him as a blatant “mugger” of the very worst type, offered his

heartiest congratulations.

At the laboratory door Hill stopped for a second to get his breath, and

then entered. He looked straight up the laboratory and saw all five girl

students grouped in their places, and Wedderburn, the once retiring

Wedderburn, leaning rather gracefully against the window, playing with

the blind tassel and talking, apparently, to the five of them. Now Hill

could talk bravely enough and even overbearingly to one girl, and he

could have made a speech to a roomful of girls, but this business of

standing at ease and appreciating, fencing, and returning quick remarks

round a group, was, he knew, altogether beyond him. Coming up the

staircase his feelings for Wedderburn had been generous, a certain

admiration perhaps, a willingness to shake his hand conspicuously and

heartily as one who had fought but the first round. But before Christmas

Wedderburn had never gone up to that end of the room to talk. In a flash

Hill’s mist of vague excitement condensed abruptly to a vivid dislike of

Wedderburn. Possibly his expression changed. As he came up to his place

Wedderburn nodded carelessly to him, and the others glanced round. Miss

Haysman looked at him and away again, the faintest touch of her eyes. “I

can’t agree with you, Mr. Wedderburn,” she said.

“I must congratulate you on your first class, Mr. Hill,” said the

spectacled girl in green, turning round and beaming at him.

“It’s nothing,” said Hill, staring at Wedderburn and Miss Haysman

talking together, and eager to hear what they talked about.

“We poor folks in the second class don’t think so,” said the girl in

spectacles.

What was it Wedderburn was saying? Something about William Morris! Hill

did not answer the girl in spectacles, and the smile died out of his

face. He could not hear and failed to see how he could “cut in.”

Confound Wedderburn! He sat down, opened his bag, hesitated whether to

return the volume of Browning forthwith, in the sight of all, and

instead drew out his new note-books for the short course in elementary

botany that was now beginning, and which would terminate in February. As

he did so a fat heavy man with a white face and pale grey eyes, Bindon,

the professor of Botany who came up from Kew for January and February,

came in by the lecture-theatre door and passed, rubbing his hands

together and smiling in silent affability, down the laboratory.

In the subsequent six weeks Hill experienced some very rapid and

curiously complex emotional developments. For the most part he had

Wedderburn in focus—a fact that Miss Haysman never suspected. She told

Hill (for in the comparative privacy of the museum she talked a good

deal to him of socialism and Browning and general propositions) that she

had met Wedderburn at the house of some people she knew, and “He’s

inherited his cleverness; for his father, you know, is the great

eye-specialist.”

“_My_ father is a cobbler,” said Hill, quite irrelevantly, and perceived

the want of dignity even as he said it. But the gleam of jealousy did

not offend her. She conceived herself the fundamental source of it. He

suffered bitterly from a sense of Wedderburn’s unfairness and a

realisation of his own handicap. Here was this Wedderburn had picked up

a prominent man for a father, and instead of his losing so many marks on

the score of that advantage, it was counted to him for righteousness!

And while Hill had to introduce himself and talk to Miss Haysman

clumsily over mangled guinea-pigs in the laboratory, this Wedderburn, in

some backstairs way, had access to her social altitudes, and could

converse in a polished argot that Hill understood perhaps, but felt

incapable of speaking. Not of course that he wanted to. Then it seemed

to Hill that for Wedderburn to come there day after day with cuffs

unfrayed, neatly tailored, precisely barbered, quietly perfect, was in

itself an ill-bred, sneering sort of proceeding. Moreover, it was a

stealthy thing for Wedderburn to behave insignificantly for a space, to

mock modesty, to lead Hill to fancy that he himself was beyond dispute

the man of the year, and then suddenly to dart in front of him, and

incontinently to swell up in this fashion. In addition to these things

Wedderburn displayed an increasing disposition to join in any

conversational grouping that included Miss Haysman, and would venture,

and indeed seek occasion to pass opinions derogatory to Socialism and

Atheism. He goaded Hill to incivilities by neat, shallow, and

exceedingly effective personalities about the socialist leaders, until

Hill hated Bernard Shaw’s graceful egotisms, William Morris’s limited

editions and luxurious wall-papers, and Walter Crane’s charmingly absurd

ideal working-men, about as much as he hated Wedderburn. The

dissertations in the laboratory that had been his glory in the previous

term, became a danger, degenerated into inglorious tussles with

Wedderburn, and Hill kept to them only out of an obscure perception that

his honour was involved. In the Debating Society Hill knew quite clearly

that, to a thunderous accompaniment of banged desks, he could have

pulverised Wedderburn. Only Wedderburn never attended the Debating

Society to be pulverised, because—nauseous affectation!—he “dined late.”

You must not imagine that these things presented themselves in quite

such a crude form to Hill’s perception. Hill was a born generaliser.

Wedderburn to him was not so much an individual obstacle as a type, the

salient angle of a class. The economic theories that, after infinite

ferment, had shaped themselves in Hill’s mind, became abruptly concrete

at the contact. The world became full of easy-mannered, graceful,

gracefully dressed, conversationally dexterous, finally shallow

Wedderburns, Bishops Wedderburn, Wedderburns, M.P., Professors

Wedderburn, Wedderburn landlords, all with finger-bowl shibboleths and

epigrammatic cities of refuge from a sturdy debater. And every one ill

clothed or ill dressed, from the cobbler to the cab runner, was a man

and a brother, a fellow-sufferer, to Hill’s imagination. So that he

became, as it were, a champion of the fallen and oppressed, albeit to

outward seeming only a self-assertive, ill-mannered young man, and an

unsuccessful champion at that. Again and again, a skirmish over the

afternoon tea that the girl-students had inaugurated, left Hill with

flushed cheeks and a tattered temper, and the Debating Society noticed a

new quality of sarcastic bitterness in his speeches.

You will understand now how it was necessary, if only in the interests

of humanity, that Hill should demolish Wedderburn in the forthcoming

examination and outshine him in the eyes of Miss Haysman, and you will

perceive, too, how Miss Haysman fell into some common feminine

misconceptions. The Hill-Wedderburn quarrel, for in his unostentatious

way Wedderburn reciprocated Hill’s ill-veiled rivalry, became a tribute

to her indefinable charm. She was the Queen of Beauty in a tournament of

scalpels and stumpy pencils. To her confidential friend’s secret

annoyance, it even troubled her conscience, for she was a good girl, and

painfully aware, from Ruskin and contemporary fiction, how entirely

men’s activities are determined by women’s attitudes. And if Hill never

by any chance mentioned the topic of love to her, she only credited him

with the finer modesty for that omission.

So the time came on for the second examination, and Hill’s increasing

pallor confirmed the general rumour that he was working hard. In the

Aërated Bread Shop near South Kensington Station you would see him,

breaking his bun and sipping his milk, with his eyes intent upon a paper

of closely written notes. In his bedroom there were propositions about

buds and stems round his looking-glass, a diagram to catch his eye, if

soap should chance to spare it, above his washing-basin. He missed

several meetings of the Debating Society, but he found the chance

encounters with Miss Haysman in the spacious ways of the adjacent Art

Museum, or in the little Museum at the top of the College, or in the

College corridors, more frequent and very restful. In particular they

used to meet in a little gallery full of wrought-iron chests and gates,

near the Art Library, and there Hill used to talk, under the gentle

stimulus of her flattering attention, of Browning and his personal

ambitions. A characteristic she found remarkable in him was his freedom

from avarice. He contemplated quite calmly the prospect of living all

his life on an income below a hundred pounds a year. But he was

determined to be famous, to make, recognisably in his own proper person,

the world a better place to live in. He took Bradlaugh and John Burns

for his leaders and models, poor, even impecunious, Great Men. But Miss

Haysman thought that such lives were deficient on the æsthetic side, by

which, though she did not know it, she meant good wall-paper and

upholstery, pretty books, tasteful clothes, concerts, and meals nicely

cooked and respectfully served.

At last came the day of the second examination, and the professor of

botany, a fussy conscientious man, rearranged all the tables in the long

narrow laboratory to prevent copying, and put his demonstrator on a

chair on a table (where he felt, he said, like a Hindoo god) to see all

the cheating, and stuck a notice outside the door, “Door Closed,” for no

earthly reason that any human being could discover. And all the morning

from ten to one the quill of Wedderburn shrieked defiance at Hill’s, and

the quills of the others chased their leaders in a tireless pack. So

also it was in the afternoon. Wedderburn was a little quieter than

usual, and Hill’s face was hot all day, and his overcoat bulged with

text-books and note-books against the last moment’s revision. And the

next day, in the morning and in the afternoon, was the practical

examination, when sections had to be cut and slides identified. In the

morning Hill was depressed because he knew he had cut a thick section,

and in the afternoon came the Mysterious Slip.

It was just the kind of thing that the botanical professor was always

doing. Like the income tax, it offered a premium to the cheat. It was a

preparation under the microscope, a little glass slip, held in its place

on the stage of the instrument by light steel clips, and the inscription

set forth that the slip was not to be moved. Each student was to go in

turn to it, sketch it, write in his book of answers what he considered

it to be, and return to his place. Now to move such a slip is a thing

one can do by a chance movement of the finger, and in a fraction of a

second. The professor’s reason for decreeing that the slip should not be

moved depended on the fact that the object he wanted identified was

characteristic of a certain tree stem. In the position in which it was

placed it was a difficult thing to recognise, but once the slip was

moved so as to bring other parts of the preparation into view, its

nature was obvious enough.

Hill came to this, flushed from a contest with staining reagents, sat

down on the little stool before the microscope, turned the mirror to get

the best light, and then out of sheer habit shifted the slip. At once he

remembered the prohibition, and with an almost continuous motion of his

hands, moved it back, and sat paralysed with astonishment at his action.

Then slowly he turned his head. The professor was out of the room, the

demonstrator sat aloft on his impromptu rostrum, reading the “Q. Jour.

Mi. Sci.,” the rest of the examinees were busy and with their backs to

him. Should he own up to the accident now? He knew quite clearly what

the thing was. It was a lenticel, a characteristic preparation from the

elder-tree. His eye roved over his intent fellow-students and Wedderburn

suddenly glanced over his shoulder at him with a queer expression in his

eyes. The mental excitement that had kept Hill at an abnormal pitch of

vigour these two days gave way to a curious nervous tension. His book of

answers was beside him. He did not write down what the thing was, but

with one eye at the microscope he began making a hasty sketch of it. His

mind was full of this grotesque puzzle in ethics that had suddenly been

sprung upon him. Should he identify it? Or should he leave this question

unanswered? In that case Wedderburn would probably come out first in the

botanical list. How could he tell now whether he might not have

identified the thing without shifting it? It was possible that

Wedderburn had failed to recognise it, of course. Suppose Wedderburn,

too, had shifted the slide? He looked up at the clock. There were

fifteen minutes in which to make up his mind. He gathered up his book of

answers and the coloured pencils he used in illustrating his replies,

and walked back to his seat.

He read through his manuscript and then sat thinking and gnawing his

knuckle. It would look queer now if he owned up. He _must_ beat

Wedderburn. He forgot the examples of those starry gentlemen, John Burns

and Bradlaugh. Besides, he reflected, the glimpse of the rest of the

slip he had had, was after all quite accidental, forced upon him by

chance, a kind of providential revelation rather than an unfair

advantage. It was not nearly so dishonest to avail himself of that as it

was of Broome, who believed in the efficacy of prayer, to pray daily for

a First-Class. “Five minutes more,” said the demonstrator, folding up

his paper and becoming observant. Hill watched the clock hands until two

minutes remained, then he opened the book of answers, and with hot ears

and an affectation of ease, gave his drawing of the lenticel its name.

When the second pass list appeared, the previous positions of Wedderburn

and Hill were reversed, and the spectacled girl in green who knew the

demonstrator in private life (where he was practically human) said that

in the result of the two examinations taken together, Hill had the

advantage of a mark, 167 to 166, out of a possible 200. Every one

admired Hill in a way, though the suspicion of “mugging” clung to him.

But Hill was to find congratulations and Miss Haysman’s enhanced opinion

of him, and even the decided decline in the crest of Wedderburn tainted

by an unhappy memory. He felt a remarkable access of energy at first,

and the note of a Democracy marching to Triumph returned to his Debating

Society speeches; he worked at his comparative anatomy with tremendous

zeal and effect, and he went on with his æsthetic education. But through

it all, a vivid little picture was continually coming before his mind’s

eye, of a sneakish person manipulating a slide....

No human being had witnessed the act, and he was cocksure that no Higher

Power existed to see it, but for all that it worried him. Memories are

not dead things, but alive; they dwindle in disuse, but they harden and

develop in all sorts of queer ways if they are being continually

fretted. Curiously enough, though at the time he perceived clearly that

the shifting was accidental, as the days wore on his memory became

confused about it, until at last he was not sure, although he assured

himself that he _was_ sure, whether the movement had been absolutely

involuntary. Then it is possible that Hill’s dietary was conducive to

morbid conscientiousness,—a breakfast frequently eaten in a hurry, a

midday bun, and, at such hours after five as chanced to be convenient,

such meat as his means determined, usually in a chophouse in a back

street off the Brompton Road. Occasionally he treated himself to

threepenny and ninepenny classics, and they usually represented a

suppression of potatoes or chops. It is indisputable that outbreaks of

self-abasement and emotional revival have a distinct relation to periods

of scarcity. But apart from this influence on the feelings, there was in

Hill a distinct aversion to falsity, that the blasphemous Landport

cobbler had inculcated by strap and tongue from his earliest years. Of

one fact about professed Atheists I am convinced: they may be, they

usually are, fools, void of subtlety, revilers of holy institutions,

brutal speakers, and mischievous knaves; but they lie with difficulty.

If it were not so, if they had the faintest grasp of the idea of

compromise, they would simply be liberal Churchmen. And, moreover, this

memory poisoned his regard for Miss Haysman. For she now preferred him

to Wedderburn so evidently that he felt sure he cared for her, and began

reciprocating her attentions by timid marks of personal regard,—at one

time he even bought a bunch of violets, carried it about in his pocket,

and produced it with a stumbling explanation, withered and dead, in the

gallery of old iron. It poisoned, too, the denunciation of capitalist

dishonesty that had been one of his life’s pleasures. And, lastly, it

poisoned his triumph over Wedderburn. Previously he had been

Wedderburn’s superior in his own eyes, and had raged simply at a want of

recognition. Now he began to fret at the darker suspicion of a positive

inferiority. He fancied he found justification for his position in

Browning; but they vanished on analysis. At last, moved curiously enough

by exactly the same motive forces that had resulted in his dishonesty,

he went to Professor Bindon and made a clean breast of the whole affair.

As Hill was a paid student, Professor Bindon did not ask him to sit

down, and he stood before the Professor’s desk as he made his

confession.

“It’s a curious story,” said Professor Bindon, slowly realising how the

thing reflected on himself, and then letting his anger rise. “A most

remarkable story. I can’t understand your doing it, and I can’t

understand this avowal. You’re a type of student—Cambridge men would

never dream—I suppose I ought to have thought—Why _did_ you cheat?”

“I didn’t—cheat,” said Hill.

“But you have just been telling me you did.”

“I thought I explained—”

“Either you cheated or you did not cheat.”

“I said my motion was involuntary—”

“I am not a metaphysician, I am a servant of science—of fact. You were

told not to move the slip. You did move the slip. If that is not

cheating—”

“If I was a cheat,” said Hill, with the note of hysterics in his voice,

“should I come here and tell you?”

“Your repentance, of course, does you credit,” said Professor Bindon;

“but it does not alter the original facts.”

“No, sir,” said Hill, giving in, in utter self-abasement.

“Even now you cause an enormous amount of trouble. The examination list

will have to be revised.”

“I suppose so, sir.”

“Suppose so! Of course it must be revised. And I don’t see how I can

conscientiously pass you.”

“Not pass me!” said Hill. “Fail me!”

“It’s the rule in all examinations. Or where should we be? What else did

you expect? You don’t want to shirk the consequences of your own acts?”

“I thought perhaps,” said Hill. And then, “Fail me! I thought, as I told

you, you would simply deduct the marks given for that slip—”

“Impossible!” said Bindon. “Besides, it would still leave you above

Wedderburn. Deduct only the marks! Preposterous! The Departmental

Regulations distinctly say—”

“But it’s my own admission, sir.”

“The Regulations say nothing whatever of the manner in which the matter

comes to light. They simply provide—”

“It will ruin me. If I fail this examination, they won’t renew my

scholarship.”

“You should have thought of that before.”

“But, sir, consider all my circumstances—”

“I cannot consider anything. Professors in this College are machines.

The Regulations will not even let us recommend our students for

appointments. I am a machine, and you have worked me. I have to do—”

“It’s very hard, sir.”

“Possibly it is.”

“If I am to be failed this examination I might as well go home at once.”

“That is as you think proper.” Bindon’s voice softened a little, he

perceived he had been unjust, and, provided he did not contradict

himself, he was disposed to amelioration. “As a private person,” he

said, “I think this confession of yours goes far to mitigate your

offence. But you have set the machinery in motion, you know, and now it

must take its course. I—I am really sorry you gave way.”

A wave of emotion prevented Hill from answering. Suddenly very vividly

he saw the heavily-lined face of the old Landport cobbler, his father.

“Good God!—What a fool I have been!” he said hotly and abruptly.

“I hope,” said Bindon, “that it will be a lesson to you.”

But curiously enough they were not thinking of quite the same

indiscretion.

There was a pause.

“I would like a day to think, sir, and then I will let you know—about

going home, I mean,” said Hill, moving towards the door.

The next day Hill’s place was vacant. The spectacled girl in green was,

as usual, first with the news. Wedderburn and Miss Haysman were talking

of the Meistersingers, when she came up to them.

“Have you heard?” she said.

“Heard what?”

“There was cheating in the examination.”

“Cheating!” said Wedderburn, with his face suddenly hot. “How?”

“That slide—”

“Moved? Never!”

“It was. That slide that we weren’t to move—”

“Nonsense!” said Wedderburn. “Why! How could they find out? Who do they

say—”

“It was Mr. Hill.”

“_Hill_!”

“Mr. Hill!”

“Not—surely not the immaculate Hill?” said Wedderburn, recovering.

“I don’t believe it,” said Miss Haysman. “How do you know?”

“I _didn’t_,” said the girl in spectacles. “But I know it now for a

fact. Mr. Hill went and confessed to Professor Bindon himself.”

“By Jove!” said Wedderburn. “Hill of all people—But I am always inclined

to distrust these philanthropists-on-principle—”

“Are you quite sure?” said Miss Haysman, with a catch in her breath.

“Quite. It’s dreadful, isn’t it? But you know, what can you expect? His

father is a cobbler—”

Then Miss Haysman astonished the girl in spectacles.

“I don’t care. I will not believe it,” she said, flushing darkly under

her warm-tinted skin. “I will not believe it until he has told me so

himself—face to face. I would scarcely believe it then,” and abruptly

she turned her back on the girl in spectacles, and walked to her own

place.

“It’s true, all the same,” said the girl in spectacles, peering and

smiling at Wedderburn.

But Wedderburn did not answer her. She was, indeed, one of those people

who are destined to make unanswered remarks.

30 Strange Stories · 第 45 / 74 题