CHAPTER XV.

DISINFECTION AND STERILIZATION (CONTINUED).

CHOICE OF AGENT.

The choice of the above-described agents depends on the conditions.

Evidently a barn is not to be disinfected in the same way that a

test-tube in the laboratory is sterilized. Among the factors to be

considered in making a choice are the thing to be disinfected or

sterilized, its size and nature, that is, whether it will be injured by

the process proposed, cost of the agent, especially when a large amount

of material is to be treated. Among the conditions which affect the

action of all agents the following should be borne in mind particularly

when testing the disinfecting power of chemical agents:

1. _The kind of bacterium_ to be destroyed, since some are more readily

killed by a given disinfectant than others, even though no spores are

present.

2. _The age of the culture._ Young bacteria less than twenty-four hours

old are usually more readily killed than older ones since the cell wall

is more delicate and more easily penetrated, though old growths may

be weakened by the accumulation of their products and be more easily

destroyed.

3. _Presence of spores_, since they are much more resistant than the

growing cells.

4. Whether the organism is a _“good” or “bad” growth_, _i.e._, whether

it has grown in a favorable environment and hence is vigorous, or under

unfavorable conditions and hence is weak.

5. _The number of bacteria present_, since with chemical agents the

action is one of relative masses.

6. _Nature of the substance in which the bacteria are._ Metallic salts,

especially bichloride of mercury, are precipitated by albuminous

substances and if employed at all must be used in several times the

ordinary strength. Solids require relatively more of a given solution

than liquids.

7. _State of the disinfectant_, whether solid, liquid or gas, and

whether it is ionized or not. Solutions penetrate best and are

therefore more quickly active and more efficient.

8. _The solvent._ Water is the best solvent to use. Strong alcohol (90

per cent. +) diminishes the effect of carbolic acid, formaldehyde and

bichloride of mercury. Oil has a similar effect. The action is probably

to prevent the penetration of the disinfectant.

9. _Strength of solution._ The stronger the solution, the more rapid

and more certain the action, for the same reason as mentioned under 5.

In fact, every disinfectant has a strength below the lethal at which it

stimulates bacterial growth.

10. _Addition of salts._ Common salt favors the action of bichloride

of mercury and also of carbolic acid. Other salts may hinder by

precipitating the disinfectant.

11. _Temperature._ Chemical disinfectants, as a rule, follow the

general law that chemical action increases with the temperature, up to

the point where the heat of itself is sufficient to kill.

12. _Time of action._ It is scarcely necessary to point out that a

certain length of time is necessary for any disinfectant to act. One

may touch a red hot stove and not be burned. All the above-mentioned

conditions are influenced by the time of action.

STANDARDIZATION OF DISINFECTANTS--“PHENOL COEFFICIENT.”

Many attempts have been made to devise standard methods for testing

the relative strengths of disinfectants. The one most widely used in

the United States is the so-called “Hygienic Laboratory” method of

determining the “phenol coefficient” of the given substance and is a

modification of the method originally proposed by Rideal and Walker

in England. In this method as proposed by Anderson and McClintic,

formerly of the above laboratory, the strengths of the dilution of the

disinfectant to be tested which kills a culture of _Bacterium typhosum_

in 2-1/2 minutes is divided by the strength of the dilution of carbolic

acid which does the same; and the dilution which kills in 15 minutes is

likewise divided by the corresponding dilution of carbolic acid. The

two ratios thus obtained are averaged and the result is the “phenol

coefficient.” For example

Phenol 1:80 killed in 2-1/2 minutes

Disinfectant “A” 1:375 „ „ „ „

Phenol 1:110 „ „ 15 „

Disinfectant “A” 1:650 „ „ „ „

375 ÷ 80 = 4.69

650 ÷ 110 = 5.91

-----

2)10.60

-----

Average = 5.30 = “phenol coefficient.”

Standard conditions of temperature, age of culture, medium, reaction,

etc., and of making the dilutions and transfers are insisted on.

Details may be found in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1911, 8, p.

1.

This is probably as good a method as any for arriving at the relative

strengths of disinfectants and in the hands of any given worker

concordant results in comparative tests can usually be attained.

Experience has shown that the results obtained by different workers

with the same disinfectant may be decidedly at variance. This is to

be expected from a knowledge of the factors affecting the action of

disinfectants above stated and from the known specific action of

certain disinfectants on certain organisms (compare anilin dyes, p.

162).

It seems that the only sure way to test the action of such a substance

is to try it out in the way it is to be used. It is scarcely wise to

adopt the “phenol coefficient” method as a legal standard method as

some states have done.

PRACTICAL STERILIZATION AND DISINFECTION.

The methods for sterilizing in the laboratory have been discussed and

will be referred to again in the next chapter.

In practical disinfection it is a good plan always to _proceed as

though spores were present_ even if the organism is known. Hence use an

_abundance of the agent_ and _apply it as long as practicable_. Also

it is best to secure the _chemical substances used as such_ and _not

depend on patented mixtures purporting to contain them_. As a rule the

latter are _more expensive_ in _proportion to the results secured_.

_Surgical instruments_ may be sterilized by boiling in water for

fifteen minutes, provided they are clean, as they should be. If dried

blood, pus, mucus, etc., are adherent, which should never be the case,

they should be boiled one-half hour. The addition of sodium carbonate

(0.5 to 1 per cent.) prevents rusting. Surgeons’ sterilizers are to

be had at reasonable prices and are very convenient. Whether the

instruments are boiled or subjected to streaming steam depends on

whether the supporting tray is covered with water or not. The author

finds it a good plan to keep the needles of hypodermic syringes in a

small wire basket in an _oil bath_. The oil may be heated to 150° to

200° and the needles sterilized in a very few minutes. The oil also

prevents rusting.

_Rooms_, _offices_ and all spaces which may be readily made practically

gas-tight are best disinfected by means of formaldehyde by any of the

methods above described (Figs. 111 and 112).

_Stables_ and _Barnyards_ (Mohler): “A preliminary cleaning up of all

litter is advisable together with the scraping of the floor, mangers

and walls of the stable with hoes and the removal of all dust and

filth. All this material should be burned since it probably contains

the infective agent. Heat may be applied to the surfaces, including

barnyard, by means of a ‘cyclone oil burner.’ When such burning is

impracticable, the walls may be disinfected with one of the following:

1. Whitewash 1 gallon + chloride of lime 6 ounces.

2. Whitewash 1 gallon + crude carbolic acid 7 ounces.

3. Whitewash 1 gallon + formalin 4 ounces.

The same may be applied with brushes or, more rapidly, sprayed on with

a pump; the surface soil of the yard and surroundings should be removed

to a depth of 5 or 6 inches, placed in a heap and thoroughly mixed

with quicklime. The fresh surface of soil thus exposed may be sprinkled

with a solution of a chemical disinfectant as above described.

[Illustration: FIG. 111.--Formaldehyde generator used in city work for

room disinfection.]

[Illustration: FIG. 112.--Government formaldehyde generator.]

“Portions of walls and ceiling not readily accessible may be

disinfected by chlorine gas liberated from chloride of lime by crude

carbolic acid. This is accomplished by making a cone of 5 or 6 pounds

of chloride of lime in the top of which a deep crater is made for the

placement of from 1 to 2 pints of crude carbolic acid. The edge of

the crater is thereupon pushed into the fluid, when a lively reaction

follows. Owing to the heat generated, it is advisable to place the

chloride of lime in an iron crucible (pot), and to have nothing

inflammable within a radius of two feet. The number and location of

these cones of chloride of lime depend on the size and structure

of the building to be disinfected. As a rule it may be stated that

chlorine gas liberated from the above sized cone will be sufficient for

disinfecting 5200 cubic feet of air space.”

_Liquid manure_, _leachings_, etc., where collected are thoroughly

disinfected by chloride of lime applied in the proportion of 2 parts to

1000 of fluid.

[Illustration: FIG. 113.--Chamber used in government work for

formaldehyde disinfection. The small cylinder at the side is the

generator.]

_Vehicles_ may be thoroughly washed with 2 per cent. formalin solution,

or if closed space is available, subjected to formaldehyde gas

disinfection, after cushions, hangings, etc., have been removed and

washed with the disinfectant.

_Harness_, _brushes_, _combs_ should be washed with a solution of

formalin, carbolic acid, or creolin as given under these topics.

_Washable articles_ should be boiled, dropped into disinfectant,

solutions as soon as soiled, and then boiled or steamed.

_Unwashable articles_--burn all possible. Use formaldehyde gas method

in a closed receptacle (Fig. 113).

_Stock cars_--the method described for stables is applicable here.

_Animals, large and small_, may have the coat and surface of the body

disinfected by washing with 1 to 1000 bichloride or strong hot soapsuds

to which carbolic acid has been added to make a 5 per cent. solution;

they should then be given a good warm bath.

Frequently time and money are saved by a combination of steam and

formaldehyde disinfection. This is a regular practice in municipal and

quarantine disinfection (Fig. 114).

[Illustration: FIG. 114.--Chamber in actual use at government

quarantine station for disinfecting baggage and dunnage with steam

or formaldehyde or both. The small cylinder at the side is the steam

formaldehyde generator.]

Persons engaged in disinfection work should wear rubber boots, coats

and caps which should be washed in a disinfectant solution and the

change to ordinary clothing made in a special room so that no infective

material will be taken away.

PART III.

THE STUDY OF BACTERIA.

CHAPTER XVI.

CULTURE MEDIA.

The study of bacteria may be taken up for the disciplinary and

pedagogic value of the study of a science; with the idea of extending

the limits of knowledge; or for the purpose of learning their

beneficial or injurious actions with the object of taking advantage of

the former and combating or preventing the latter.

Since bacteria are classed as plants, their successful study implies

their cultivation on a suitable soil. A growth of bacteria is called

a “_culture_” and the “soil” or material on which they are grown is

called a “_culture medium_.” In so far as the culture medium is made up

in the laboratory it is an “artificial culture medium” as distinguished

from a natural medium. A culture consisting of one kind of bacteria

only is spoken of as a “pure culture,” and accurate knowledge of

bacteria depends on obtaining them in “pure culture.” After getting

a “pure culture” the special characteristics of the organism must be

ascertained in order to distinguish it from others. The discussion of

the _morphology_ of bacteria in Chapters II, III, and IV shows that

the morphological structures are too few to separate individual kinds.

They serve at best to enable groups of similarly appearing forms to be

arranged. Hence any further differentiation must be based on a study

of the _physiology_ of the organism as discussed in the chapters on

Physiological Activities of Bacteria.

The thorough study of a bacterium involves, therefore:

1. Its isolation in pure culture.

2. Its study with the microscope to determine morphological features

and staining reactions.

3. Growth on culture media for determining its physiological activities

as well as morphological characteristics of the growths themselves.

4. Animal inoculations in certain instances.

5. Special serum reactions in some cases.

Since isolation in pure culture requires material for growing the

organism, the first subject to be considered is culture media.

A culture medium for a given bacterium should show the following

essentials:

1. It must contain all the elements necessary for the growth of the

organism except those that may be obtained from the surrounding

atmosphere.

2. These elements must be in a form available to the organism.

3. The medium must not be too dry, in order to furnish sufficient

moisture for growth and to prevent too great a concentration of the

different ingredients.

4. The reaction must be adjusted to suit the particular organism dealt

with.

5. There must be no injurious substances present in concentration

sufficient to inhibit the growth of the organism or to kill it.

Ordinarily, more attention must be paid to the sources of the two

elements N and C than to the others, for in general the substances

used to furnish these two and the water contain the other elements in

sufficient amount. For very exact work on the products of bacteria,

_synthetic media_ containing definite amounts of chemicals of known

composition have been prepared, but for most of the work with bacteria

pathogenic to animals such media are not needed.

Culture media may be either _liquid_ or _solid_, or for certain

purposes may be liquid at higher temperatures and solid at lower, as

indicated later. Liquid media are of value for obtaining bacteria for

the study of morphology and cell groupings and for ascertaining many of

the physiological activities of the organisms. Solid media are useful

for studying some few of the physiological activities and especially

for determining characteristic appearances of the isolated growths

of bacteria. These isolated growths of bacteria on solid media are

technically spoken of as “_colonies_,” whether they are microscopic in

size or visible to the unaided eye.

It is clear that the kinds of culture media used for the study of

bacteria may be unlimited but the undergraduate student will need to

use a relatively small number, which will be discussed in this section.

=Meat Broth (Bouillon).=[20]--This itself is used as a medium and as

the basis for the preparation of other solid and liquid media.

Finely ground _lean_ beef is selected because it contains the necessary

food materials. Fat is not desired since it is a poor food for most

bacteria and in the further processes of preparation would be melted

and form an undesirable film on the surface of the medium. The meat is

placed in a suitable container and mixed with about twice its weight of

_cold_ water (not distilled) and allowed to soak overnight or longer.

The cold water extracts from the meat water-soluble proteins, blood,

carbohydrates in the form of dextrose (occasionally some glycogen),

nitrogenous extractives and some of the mineral salts. The fluid is

strained or pressed free from the meat. This “meat juice” should now

be thoroughly boiled, which results in a coagulation of a large part

of the proteins and a precipitation of some of the mineral salts,

particularly phosphates of calcium and magnesium, both of which must be

filtered off and the water loss restored by adding the proper amount of

distilled water. The boiling is done at this point because the medium

must later be heated to sterilize it and it is best to get rid of the

coagulable proteins at once. The proteins thus thrown out deprive

the medium of valuable nitrogenous food material which is replaced

by adding about 1 per cent. by weight of commercial peptone. It is

usual also (though not always necessary) to add about 0.5 per cent. by

weight of common salt which helps to restore the proper concentration

of mineral ingredients lost by the boiling. The chlorine is also an

essential element. The reaction is now determined and adjusted to the

desired end point, “standardized,” as it is called. The medium is

again _thoroughly_ boiled and filtered boiling hot. The adjusting of

the reaction and the boiling ordinarily cause a precipitate to form

which is largely phosphates of the alkaline earths with some protein.

The filtered medium is collected in suitable containers, flasks or

tubes, which are plugged with well-fitting non-absorbent cotton plugs

and sterilized, best in the autoclave for twenty minutes at 15 pounds

pressure, or discontinuously in streaming steam at 100°. If careful

attention is paid to _titration_ and to _sufficient boiling_ where

indicated, the meat broth prepared as above should be clear, only

faintly yellowish in color and show no precipitate on cooling.

The conventional method for standardizing an acid medium is as follows:

Take 5 cc of the medium, add 45 cc of distilled water and 1 cc of

_phenolphthalein_ as indicator. Boil the solution and while still hot

run in from a burette N/20 NaOH solution until a faint pink color

appears. From the number of cc of N/20 NaOH used to “neutralize” the

5 cc of medium it is calculated how many cc of N/1 NaOH are necessary

to give the desired end reaction to the volume of medium which is to

be standardized. The resulting reaction is expressed as % _acid or

alkaline to phenolphthalein_. If it is necessary to add to each 100 cc

of the medium 1 cc of N/1 NaOH to make it neutral to phenolphthalein,

the reaction is called 1% acid: if to each 100 cc of medium there is

added 1 cc of N/1 alkali in addition to the quantity necessary to

neutralize, the reaction is called 1% alkaline.

In order to obtain a pink color when titrating with this indicator

not only must the “free acid” be neutralized by the alkali but also

loosely combined acid and any other substances present which will

combine with the alkali rather than with the indicator so that in many

media _more alkali_ is added than is necessary to neutralize the “free

acid,” _i.e._, the free H ions present.

It is well established that the controlling factor in the growth of

bacteria in so far as “reaction” is concerned is not the _titratable

substances_ present but only the “free acid,” _i.e._, the _number of

free H ions_, consequently it is better to determine the concentration

of H ions and to _standardize to a definite H ion concentration_.

Phenolphthalein as shown above is not a good indicator for this purpose.

The H ions present can be determined accurately in all cases only by

electrolytic methods. The apparatus necessary is usually relatively

expensive and scarcely adapted to the use of large classes of students.

There are a number of indicators each of which will show color changes

within rather narrow ranges of H ion concentration. Standardization by

the use of these indicators, the “colorimetric method,” is recommended

by the Society of American Bacteriologists and is coming into general

use.

The H ion concentration is ordinarily _indicated_ by the conventional

symbol P{H}, _e.g._, the concentration in pure water which is regarded

as neutral is expressed as P{H} 7; of normal HCl, P{H} 0; of normal

NaOH, P{H} 14. The figure after P{H} does not in reality represent the

concentration of H ions in the solution. This, like the concentration

of acids, is expressed on the basis of normality, _i.e._, as compared

with the concentration of a normal solution (1 g. equivalent) of H

ions. Concentration of H ions in pure water is N/10,000,000, _i.e._,

is 1/10,000,000 of the concentration in a normal solution of H ions.

Expressed in other words, it is the concentration in a normal solution

of H ions diluted ten million times. 10,000,000 = 10 to the 7th power

= 10⁷. Hence the figure after the P{H} indicates the _logarithm of

the number of times the solution is diluted_. Therefore this number

_increases with the dilution_, and the larger the figure after the

P{H}, the _less acid the solution is_.

Most saprophytic organisms and many parasitic ones grow within a wide

range of H ion concentration so that titration with phenolphthalein

gives sufficient accuracy for media for such organisms. On the

other hand, many organisms grow within a very narrow range of H ion

concentration, hence accurate standardization to a definite H ion

concentration is necessary. It is also evident that for comparative

work, such standardization is essential because this reaction can be

reproduced in other media and by other workers.[21]

Broth may be prepared from Liebig’s or Armour’s meat extract by adding

5 grams of either, 10 grams peptone and 5 grams NaCl to 1000 cc of

water, boiling to dissolve, then titrating and filtering as above.

The author after much experience finds _meat juice_ preferable to meat

extract for broth and other media for pathogenic bacteria, and has

abandoned the use of meat extracts for these organisms.

=Glycerin Broth.=--Glycerin broth is made by adding 4 to 6 per cent. of

glycerin to the broth just previous to the sterilization. The glycerin

serves as a source of carbon to certain bacteria which will not grow on

the ordinary broth--as _Mycobacterium tuberculosis_.

=Sugar Broths.=--Sugar broths are used for determining the action of

bacteria on these carbohydrates, since this is a valuable means of

differentiating certain forms, especially those from the intestinal

tract. Broth _free from sugar_ must first be made. This is done by

adding to broth prepared as already described, _just previous to final

filtering and sterilization_, a culture of some sugar-destroying

organism (_Bacterium coli_ is ordinarily used), and then allowing the

organism to grow in the raw broth at body temperature for twenty-four

hours. Any carbohydrate in the broth is destroyed by the _Bacterium

coli_. This mixture is then boiled to kill the _Bacterium coli_,

restandardized and then 1 per cent. by weight of required sugar is

added. Dextrose, saccharose and lactose are the most used, though

many others are used for special purposes. After the sugar is added

the medium must be sterilized by _discontinuous heating_ at 100° for

three or four successive days, because long boiling or heating in the

autoclave splits up the di- and polysaccharids into simpler sugars and

may even convert the simple sugars (dextrose) into acid.

Various other _modified broths_ are frequently used for special

purposes but need not be discussed here.

=Dunham’s peptone solution=, frequently used to determine indol

production, is a solution of 1 per cent. of peptone and 0.5 per cent.

of salt in tap water. It does not need to be titrated, but should be

boiled and filtered into tubes or flasks and sterilized.

=Nitrate Broth.=--Nitrate broth for determining nitrate reduction

is 1 per cent. of peptone, 0.2 per cent. of C. P. potassium nitrate

dissolved in distilled water and sterilized.

=Milk.=--Milk is a natural culture medium much used. It should be

fresh and thoroughly skimmed, best by a separator or centrifuge to

get rid of the _fat_. If the milk is not fresh, it should be titrated

as for broth and the reaction adjusted. The milk should be sterilized

discontinuously to avoid splitting up the lactose as well as action on

the casein and calcium phosphate.

_Litmus Milk._--Litmus milk is milk as above to which litmus has been

added as an acid production indicator. The milk should show blue when

the litmus is added or be made to by the addition of normal NaOH

solution. It should be sterilized discontinuously. Frequently on

heating litmus milk the blue color disappears due to a reduction of

the litmus. This blue color will reappear on shaking with air or on

standing several days, due to absorption of O and oxidation of the

reduced litmus, provided the heating has produced no other change in

the milk, as proper heating will not.

=Gelatin Culture Medium.=--Gelatin to the extent of 10 to 15 per

cent. is frequently added to broth and gives a culture medium of

many advantages. It is solid at temperatures up to about 25° and

fluid above this temperature, a property which is of great advantage

in the isolation of bacteria. (See Chapter XVIII.) Further gelatin

is liquefied (that is digested, converted into gelatin proteose and

gelatin peptone, which are soluble in water and do not gelatinize)

by many bacteria and not by others, a valuable diagnostic feature.

The gelatin colonies of many bacteria are very characteristic in

appearance, as is the growth of many on gelatin in culture tubes.

Gelatin medium may be prepared by adding the proper amount of gelatin

(10 to 15 per cent. by weight) broken into small pieces (powdered

gelatin in the same proportion may be used) to broth, gently warming

until the gelatin is dissolved, standardizing as for broth, filtering

and sterilizing. It is usually cleared before filtering by stirring

into the gelatin solution, cooled to below 60°, the white of an egg

for each 1000 cc., and then thoroughly boiling before filtering. The

coagulation of the egg albumen entangles the suspended matter so that

the gelatin filters perfectly clear, though with a slight yellowish

color. The filtering may be done through filter paper if the gelatin

is well boiled and filtered boiling hot, but is more conveniently done

through absorbent cotton, wet with boiling water.

Or, the gelatin may be added to _meat juice before it is boiled_, then

this is heated to about body temperature (not too hot, or the proteins

will be coagulated too soon) until the gelatin is dissolved. Then

the material is standardized and thoroughly boiled and filtered. The

proteins of the meat juice coagulate and thus clear the medium without

the addition of egg white. Commercial gelatin is markedly acid from the

method of manufacture, hence the medium requires careful titration,

even when made from a standardized broth.

Gelatin should be sterilized by discontinuous heating at 100° on three

successive days, because long boiling or heating above 100° tends to

hydrolyze the gelatin into gelatin proteose and peptone and it will

not gelatinize on cooling. It may be heated in the autoclave for

ten to fifteen minutes at 10 pounds’ pressure and sometimes not be

hydrolyzed, but the procedure is uncertain and very resistant spores

may not be killed. The medium should be put into the culture tubes in

which it is to be used as soon as filtered, and sterilized in these,

since, if put into flasks these must be sterilized, and then when

transferred to tubes for use, it must be again sterilized unless great

care is taken to have the tubes plugged and sterilized first, and in

transferring aseptically to these tubes. These repeated heatings are

very apt to decompose the gelatin, so it will not “set” on cooling. The

prepared and sterilized tubes of gelatin should be kept in an ice-box

or cool room, as they will melt in overheated laboratories in summer or

winter.

=Agar Medium.=--Agar agar, usually called agar, is a complex

carbohydrate substance of unknown composition obtained from certain

seaweeds along the coast of Japan and Southeastern Asia. It occurs

in commerce as thin translucent strips or as a powder. It resembles

gelatin only in the property its solutions have of gelatinizing when

cooled. Gelatin is an albuminoid closely related to the proteins,

agar a carbohydrate. Agar is much less soluble in water, 1 or 1.5

per cent. of agar giving a jelly as dense as 10 to 15 per cent. of

gelatin. It dissolves only in water heated to near the boiling-point

(98° to 99°) and only after much longer heating. This hot solution

“jells,” “sets” or gelatinizes at about 38° and remains solid until

again heated to near boiling. Hence bacteria may be grown on agar at

the body temperature (37°) and above, and the agar will remain solid,

while gelatin media are fluid above about 25°. No pathogenic bacteria

and none of the saprophytes liable to be met with in the laboratory are

able to “liquefy” agar.

An agar medium is conveniently prepared from broth by adding 1 or

1.5 per cent. of the finely divided agar to the broth and boiling

until dissolved, standardizing, clearing, filtering, and sterilizing.

The agar must be thoroughly boiled, usually for ten to fifteen

minutes, and the water loss made up by the addition of distilled

water before titration. Agar is practically neutral so that there is

little difference between the titration of the dissolved agar and

the original broth. The agar solution should be kept hot from the

beginning to the end except the cooling down to below 60°, when the

egg white for clearing is added. Though filtration through paper is

possible as with gelatin, if the agar solution is thoroughly boiled

and filtered boiling hot, it is more satisfactory for beginners to

use absorbent cotton wet with boiling water and to pour the hot agar

through the same filter if not clear the first time. The solidified

agar medium is never perfectly clear, but always more or less

opalescent. The agar medium may be sterilized in the autoclave for

fifteen minutes at 15 pounds pressure as the high temperature does not

injure the agar.

=Potato Media.=--Potatoes furnish a natural culture medium which is

very useful for the study of many bacteria. The simplest, and for most

purposes the best, way to use potatoes is in culture tubes as “potato

tube cultures” (No. 8, Fig. 119). These are prepared as follows:

Large tubes are used. Large healthy potatoes are selected. Each end

of the potato is sliced off so as to have parallel surfaces. With a

cork-borer of a size to fit the tubes used, cylinders about one and

one-half inches long are made. Each cylinder is cut diagonally from

base to base. This furnishes two pieces each with a circular base and

an oval, sloping surface. The pieces are then washed clean and dropped

for a minute into boiling water to destroy the oxidizing enzyme on the

surface which would otherwise cause a darkening of the potato. (The

darkening may also be prevented by keeping the freshly cut potatoes

covered with clean water until ready to sterilize.) A bit of cotton

one-fourth to one-half inch in depth is put into each of the test-tubes

to retain moisture and a piece of potato dropped in, circular base

down. The tubes are then plugged with cotton and sterilized in the

autoclave at 15 pounds pressure for not less than twenty-five minutes,

since potatoes usually harbor very resistant spores, and it is not

unusual for a few tubes to spoil even after this thorough heating.

Potatoes are sometimes used in “potato plate cultures.” The term “plate

culture” is a relic of the time when flat glass plates were used for

this and other “plate cultures.” Now glass dishes of the general

form shown in Fig. 115, called “Petri dishes,” or plates are used for

practically all plate culture work. For “potato plates” slices from

potatoes are cut as large and as thick as the relative sizes of potato

and dish permit (Fig. 116). The slices should be thin enough not to

touch the lid and thick enough to be firm.

[Illustration: FIG. 115.--Petri dish with the lid partly raised. × 1/2]

[Illustration: FIG. 116.--A potato plate. × 1/2]

It is a good plan to wrap each dish separately in paper to retain the

lid securely, then sterilize as for potato tubes, and leave plates

wrapped until wanted.

It sometimes happens that the natural acidity of potatoes is too great

for the growth of many organisms. The acidity is sufficiently corrected

by soaking the pieces of potato in a 1 per cent. solution of sodium

carbonate for an hour before they are put into the tubes or plates.

_Glycerinized potato tubes_ are conveniently prepared by covering the

potato in the tube with glycerin broth, sterilizing and pouring off the

excess broth immediately after sterilizing, taking care that the tubes

do not become contaminated which is not very probable if the work is

quickly done while the tubes are still hot.

=Blood Serum Media.=--Blood serum, usually from the larger, domestic

animals on account of convenience in securing it in quantity, is used

in the study of the bacteria causing disease in man and animals. Most

commonly the serum is collected from the clotted blood after it has

well separated (usually about forty-eight hours is required for this).

It is then run into tubes which are plugged with cotton and placed in

an apparatus for coagulating the serum by heat. A copper water bath

with a tightly closed air compartment or the horizontal autoclave (Fig.

81) is sufficient for this purpose, though special forms of apparatus

are to be had. It is important that the temperature be raised slowly so

that the blood gases escape gradually. Three to five hours or longer

should be allowed for the temperature to reach the boiling-point. If

the tubes are heated too rapidly, the serum is filled with bubbles and

badly torn since the gases are driven off suddenly. _Löffler’s serum_

is made by adding one part of dextrose broth to three parts of serum

and then coagulating as above. The solidified serum in either case is

best sterilized discontinuously, though with care the autoclave at 15

pounds pressure may be used for a single sterilization. This is very

apt to cause a greater darkening of the serum and frequently also a

laceration of the solid mass by escaping gases.

Blood serum is also used in the liquid state. For this purpose it is

best to collect it aseptically; or it may be sterilized discontinuously

at a temperature of 55° or 56° on seven to ten consecutive days. Novy

has recently suggested dialyzing the serum to free it from salts and

thus prevent its coagulation when heated. Whether the removal of the

various “extractives” which diffuse out with the salts deprives the

serum of any of its advantageous properties remains to be ascertained.

From the discussion of the physiological activities of bacteria in

Chapters IX-XII it is apparent that a very great variety of culture

media other than those described is necessary for the study of special

types of bacteria, but such media are beyond the scope of the present

work.

The ideal culture media are without a doubt the _synthetic media_, that

is media of definite known chemical composition, so that the various

changes due to the growth of bacteria can be accurately determined

and thus a means of sharply differentiating closely related organisms

be secured. Such media have been prepared and every bacteriologist

believes strongly in their future usefulness when media of wider

application shall have been devised. An example of this type of culture

media is Uschinsky’s synthetic medium, of which the following is one of

the modifications:

Distilled-water 1000 parts

Asparagin 4 „

Ammonium lactate 6 „

Disodium phosphate 2 „

Sodium chloride 5 „

A criticism of this medium is that the elements K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, and

S which have been shown to be essential are not present if chemically

pure salts are used in the preparation.

CHAPTER XVII.

METHODS OF USING CULTURE MEDIA.

The way in which culture media shall be used depends on the purpose

in view. By far the larger part of bacteriological work is done with

cultures in “bacteriological culture tubes.” Various laboratories have

their own special types but all are more or less after the “Board of

Health” form. They differ from ordinary chemical test-tubes in that

they are usually longer, have no “lip” and have much thicker walls to

prevent breakage and consequent loss of the culture as well as danger

from pathogenic organisms. The author finds two sets of tubes most

serviceable for student use--one size 15 cm. long by 19 mm. outside

diameter (No. 9, Fig. 119), the other 15 cm. long by 13 mm. (Nos. 1 to

7, Fig. 119). Culture tubes are conveniently used in “wire baskets”

circular or square in section and of a size to correspond with the

length and number of tubes used. These baskets are light, do not break,

and if made of good galvanized wire netting do not readily rust (Figs.

117 and 118).

Liquid media such as broth, milk, litmus milk, indol and nitrate broths

are used in the above-mentioned tubes when small quantities only are

to be worked with. The tubes are filled approximately one-third full,

then plugged with _non-absorbent_ cotton and sterilized. _Cotton plugs_

are used so much in bacteriological work because they permit a free

circulation of air and gases and at the same time act as filters to

keep out the bacteria of the air.

Sugar broths or other media in which gas may be produced are used in

fermentation tubes (Smith tubes) of the type shown in Fig. 120 so that

the gas may be collected in the closed arm of the tube, measured (Fig.

121) and tested if desired.

[Illustration: FIG. 117.--Round wire basket.]

[Illustration: FIG. 118.--Square wire basket.]

[Illustration: FIG. 119.--Culture tubes with media in them. × 2/3. _1_

to _7_ are the smaller tubes mentioned in the text; _9_ the larger

tube; _8_ is extra large for potato tubes; _1_, plain broth; _2_, plain

milk; _3_, litmus milk; _4_, gelatin for “stab” or “puncture” culture;

_5_, agar for “stab” or “puncture” culture; _6_, agar for “slope” or

“slant” culture; _7_, blood serum; _8_, potato tube; _9_, agar for

plating. Note the transparency of the broth and gelatin and the slight

opalescence of the agar.]

One method of using gelatin and also agar is as “puncture” or “stab”

cultures. The tubes (the narrower tubes are to be preferred for most

“stab” cultures) are filled one-third full of the medium while it is

still fluid, plugged, sterilized and allowed to cool in the vertical

position. The medium is then “inoculated” with a _straight_ platinum

needle by plunging this into the center of the surface down to the

bottom of the tube (Fig. 119, Nos. 4 and 5).

[Illustration: FIG. 120.--Fermentation tubes. _1_, filled ready for

use; _2_, shows a cloudy growth and the development of gas in the

closed arm.]

Agar and blood serum are frequently used in the form of “slope” or

“slant” cultures. That is, the medium solidifies with the tubes lying

on their sides which gives a long, sloping _surface_ on which the

bacteria are inoculated (Fig. 119, Nos. 6 and 7).

[Illustration: FIG. 121.--Method of estimating percentage of gas in a

fermentation tube by means of the “gasometer”, the reading is 45 per

cent.]

[Illustration: FIG. 122.--A toxin flask showing a large surface

growth.]

Potato tubes are likewise used for “slant” or “slope” cultures (Fig.

119, No. 8). Potatoes as “plate cultures” have been referred to. Agar

and gelatin are very largely used in the form of “plate cultures”

also. For this purpose Petri dishes are first sterilized, then the

melted agar or gelatin poured into them and allowed to “set” while the

plates are kept horizontal. The melted media may be “inoculated” before

they are poured, or a portion of the material to be “plated” may be

placed in the dish, then the melted medium poured in and distributed

over the dish by tilting in various directions, or the medium after

solidifying may be inoculated by “strokes” or “streaks” over its

surface, according to the purpose in view in using the plate. The

larger sized tubes should be used for making plates in order to have

sufficient medium in the plate (No. 9, Fig. 119).

For using large quantities of medium, Florence flasks, Ehrlenmeyer

flasks, special toxin flasks (Fig. 122) or various other devices

(Vaughan and Novy’s “mass cultures,” Figs. 123 and 124) have been

employed.

For growing _anaërobic organisms_ it is evident that some method for

removing and excluding the oxygen of the air must be used. A very great

variety of appliances have been devised for these purposes. Some are

based on the principle of the vacuum, exhausting the air with an air

pump; some on replacing the air with a stream of hydrogen; others on

absorbing the oxygen by chemical means, as with an alkaline solution

of pyrogallic acid, or even by growing a vigorous aërobe in the

same culture or in the same container with the anaërobe, the aërobe

exhausting the oxygen so that the anaërobe then develops, or finally

by excluding the air through the use of deep culture tubes well filled

with the medium, or in the closed arm of fermentation tubes. For many

purposes a combination of two or more of the above methods gives good

results.

In any event the culture medium should have been _freshly sterilized_

just before use, or _should be boiled_ in order to drive out the

dissolved oxygen. For most, anaërobes the presence in the medium of

about 1 per cent. of a carbohydrate, as dextrose, is advisable.

A description of all the various devices is unnecessary in this work,

but the following have answered most of the purposes of general work in

the author’s laboratories.

[Illustration: FIG. 123.--Tank with raised lids. (Vaughan.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 124.--Tank with lids lowered. (Vaughan.)

FIGS. 123 and 124.--Vaughan and Novy’s mass culture apparatus.]

_A._ “_Vignal tubes_” of the style shown (Fig. 125) are made from

glass tubes of about 6 to 8 mm. outside diameter, sealed at the small

end, plugged with cotton above the constriction and sterilized. The

medium, agar or gelatin, which has been previously inoculated with the

anaërobic culture, is then drawn up into the tube, after breaking off

the tip, as far as the constriction. The tube is then sealed in the

flame at the small end and also at the constriction. Since it is full

of the medium and sealed, access of air is prevented. This forms an

excellent means for “isolation” (Chapter XVIII); the tube needs merely

to be cut with a file at the point where colonies appear, then these

may be readily transferred.

[Illustration: FIG. 125.--Vignal tubes. × 1/3 _1_, the sterile tube

ready for inoculation; _2_, fourth dilution tube showing a few isolated

colonies, one near the figure; _3_, third dilution showing colonies

isolated but numerous; _4_, second dilution tube showing colonies still

more numerous; _5_, first dilution tube showing colonies so numerous

and small as to give a cloudy appearance to the tube. In use tube _2_

would be filed in two at the colony and inoculations made from it.]

_B._ “_Fermentation tubes_” form a simple means for growing liquid

cultures of anaërobes, the growth occurring in the closed arm only,

while with facultative anaërobes, growth occurs both in the closed arm

and in the open bulb. A little “paraffin oil” (a clear, heavy petroleum

derivative) may be poured on the fluid in the open bulb as a very

efficient seal, though it is not usually necessary.

_C._ “_Deep culture tubes._”--The medium, agar, gelatin or a liquid is

poured into tubes until they are approximately one-half full, a little

paraffin oil is poured on the surface (not essential always), then the

tubes are plugged and sterilized. Inoculation is made to the bottom

and anaërobes grow well (Fig. 126).

[Illustration: FIG. 126.--Deep tubes showing anaërobic growth. _1_,

shows a few small gas bubbles; _2_, shows the medium broken up by the

excessive development of gas.]

_D._ For slope or plate, or any type of surface cultures the Novy jar

(Fig. 127) is the most practical device. It is good practice to combine

the vacuum method, the hydrogen replacement method and the oxygen

absorption method in using these jars. In operation a solution of 20

per cent. NaOH is poured on the bottom of the jar to a depth of 1 or 2

cm., the cultures are placed on glass supports above the alkali and a

short wide tube of strong pyrogallol is set in on the bottom in such a

way that it may be easily upset and mixed with the alkali when it is

desired to do so. The cover is now clamped in position with all joints

well vaselined. Then the outlet tube is connected with a suction pump

and the air drawn out. Meanwhile the inlet tube has been connected

with a hydrogen generator, and after the jar is exhausted hydrogen is

allowed to flow in, and this process is repeated until one is satisfied

that the air is replaced. The suction exhausts the air from the tubes

or plates so that much less time is required to replace the air with

hydrogen. Finally the stop-cock is closed, and the pyrogallol solution

is gently shaken down and mixed with the alkali so that any remaining

oxygen will be absorbed.

[Illustration: FIG. 127.--Novy jars.]

It must be remembered that facultative anaërobes as well as anaërobes

will grow under any of the above conditions, so that cultures of

organisms so obtained must be further tested aërobically in order to

determine to which group the organisms belong.

Reference has been made above to the “inoculation” of culture media,

which means introducing into the medium used the desired material in

the proper way. For small quantities this is most conveniently done

with platinum “needles,” that is, pieces of platinum wire inserted

into the ends of glass rods. The “straight” needle is a piece of

heavy platinum wire of about 0.022 inch in diameter (Fig. 128). It is

used most frequently to inoculate all forms of _solid media_. The

platinum loop is of lighter wire, 0.018 inch. The loop in the end is

conveniently made by twisting the wire around the lead of an ordinary

lead-pencil. The “loop needle” (Fig. 129) is most used in transferring

liquid media. On account of the high price of platinum, the author

has substituted “nichrome” wire for student use. This is stiffer, not

so easily made into loops and breaks out of the rods more easily.

The latter defect is remedied to some extent, by imbedding the wire

only slightly for about one-fourth of an inch on the side of the end

portion of the rod. The low cost, less than one-twentieth of platinum,

justifies its use.

[Illustration: FIG. 128.--Straight needle.]

[Illustration: FIG. 129.--Straight and loop needles.]

[Illustration: FIG. 130.--Pasteur flask--“ballon pipette.”]

Sterile graduated pipettes varying in capacity from 1 cc graduated in

hundredths, upward, permit the transfer of definite amounts of liquids.

Large quantities are conveniently transferred by means of Pasteur

flasks (Fig. 130). The details of inoculation are best derived from

laboratory practice.

CHAPTER XVIII.

ISOLATION OF BACTERIA IN PURE CULTURE.

As has been stated, the thorough study of a bacterium depends on

first getting it in pure culture. In the early days of bacteriology

supposedly pure cultures were obtained by (1) _dilution in liquid

media_. A series of tubes or flasks containing sterile liquid media was

prepared. Number one was inoculated with the material to be examined

and thoroughly mixed. A small portion of the mixture was transferred

to number two, and mixed; from this to number three, and so on until a

sufficient number were inoculated, the last three or four in the series

receiving the same amounts of a very high dilution of the original

material. If one or two of these latter showed a growth and the others

not, it was assumed that the dilution had been carried so far that only

a single organism was transferred and therefore the culture obtained

was “pure.” The method in this crude form is too uncertain to be of

value today and recourse is had to more exact means. The procedure most

widely used is that of (2) “_plating out_” by means of gelatin or agar

plates. The material to be plated out is diluted by transferring to

three or more tubes of melted gelatin or agar as in the first method

and then all the tubes are poured into Petri dishes and grown under

suitable conditions. By proper mixing in the tubes the bacteria are

well scattered through the medium which holds the individual organisms

separate when it solidifies. On some of the plates a sufficient

dilution will be reached so that the colonies developing from the

bacteria will be so few that they are separate and pure cultures may

be obtained by inoculating from one of these a tube of the appropriate

medium (Figs. 131 to 134). The chief uncertainty with this method is

that occasionally two kinds of bacteria stick together so closely that

even the separate colonies contain both organisms. This is not common,

however. The plate colonies frequently develop from groups of bacteria

which were not separated, but as these are of the same kind the culture

is essentially pure.

[Illustration: FIG. 131.--Dilution plates. × 3/10. _1_, shows the

first dilution, the colonies are so numerous and small that they

are invisible (compare Fig. 132); _2_, shows fewer and hence larger

colonies, but too crowded to isolate (compare Fig. 133); _3_, shows the

colonies larger and well separated, so that it is easy to isolate from

them (compare Fig. 134).]

[Illustration: FIG. 132.--A portion of plate _1_ in Fig. 131 as seen

under the low-power objective. × 100. Very small, closely crowded

colonies.]

Another method which is frequently applicable with material from human

or animal sources is to (3) _rub the material over the surface_ of a

slope tube or of medium solidified in a Petri dish with a sterile heavy

platinum needle, glass rod, or cotton swab. If the bacteria are not

too numerous, pure cultures may frequently be obtained. A modification

of this method is to make a series of (4) _parallel streaks on a

slope tube or plate of medium_ with a needle inserted _but once_ into

the material to be plated. On the first streak most of the bacteria

are rubbed off and a continuous growth results, but usually on the

last of a series only isolated colonies appear, which are presumably

pure. The ideal method for securing pure cultures is to be absolutely

certain that the culture starts from a single organism. This may be

accomplished by means of the (5) _apparatus and pipettes devised by

Professor Barber_ of the University of Kansas (Figs. 135 and 136). With

this instrument a single organism is picked out under the microscope

and isolated in a drop of culture medium and observed until it is

seen to divide, thus proving its viability. Transfers are then made

to the proper media. The method requires much practice to develop the

necessary skill in the making of pipettes, determining the proper

condition of the large cover-glasses used over the isolating box, and

in manipulation, but the results fully compensate.

[Illustration: FIG. 133.--From the thinnest part of plate _2_, Fig. 131

as seen under the low-power objective. × 100. Colonies much larger than

on plate _1_, but still crowded.]

[Illustration: FIG. 134.--The smallest colony on plate _3_, Fig. 131,

as seen under the low-power objective. × 100. Large, single, isolated

colony.]

Professor W. A. Starin of the author’s department, a former student of

Professor Barber, has done some excellent work with this apparatus.

[Illustration: FIG. 135.--Diagram of Barber’s isolation apparatus. _b_,

moist chamber; _ms_, large cover-glass over moist chamber; _p_, small

pipette drawn out to a fine point; _k_, _r_, _g_, pipette holder; _f_,

screw for raising and lowering _k_, _r_, _g_; _s_, screw for lateral

motion of _k_, _r_, _g_; _n_, screw for clamp on pipette which allows

it to be moved in or out; _m_, mechanical stage of microscope; _t_,

rubber tube held in the mouth and used to move the liquid culture

medium in the pipette. (Journal of Infectious Diseases, October 20,

1908, vol. 5, No. 4, p. 381.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 136.--Photograph of microscope with Barber’s

isolation apparatus set up to use.]

A number of procedures may be used to greatly facilitate the above

methods of isolation by taking advantage of the different physiological

properties of different organisms in a mixture such as ability

to form spores, different resistance to antiseptics, special food

requirements, and pathogenic properties. (_a_) If material contains

resistant spores, it may be _heated to temperatures high_ enough to

kill all of the organisms except the spores (80° for half an hour, for

example) and then plated out. Or (_b_) _an antiseptic which restrains

the growth_ of some organisms and not others may be placed in the

culture media (carbolic acid, various anilin dyes, (p. 162), excess

acid, or alkali, ox bile, etc.), when the more resistant organisms grow

on the final plates, the others not. (_c_) _Special food substances_

(various carbohydrates) from which the organism desired forms special

products (acids, aldehydes) that may be shown on the plates by various

indicators, is one of the commonest means. Or media in which certain

organisms thrive and others not, so that the former soon “crowd out”

the latter (unsterilized milk for lactic acid bacteria, inorganic

media in soil bacteriology) may be used. A combination of the general

methods (_b_) and (_c_) is much used in the separation of the organisms

of the “intestinal group” in human practice. (_d_) _The inoculation

of a susceptible animal_ with a mixture suspected to contain a given

pathogenic bacterium frequently results in the development of the

latter in pure culture in the body of an animal, from which it may be

readily recovered. In all of the above methods (except Barber’s) the

first “pure culture” obtained should be “purified” by replating in a

series of dilution plates to make sure that it is pure.

CHAPTER XIX.

STUDY OF INDIVIDUAL BACTERIA--STAINING.

When an organism has been obtained in pure culture by any of the

methods described in the preceding chapter the next step is the study

of its morphology as discussed in Chapters II--IV. This involves the

use of the microscope, and since bacteria are so small, objectives

of higher power than the student has presumably used will be needed.

Doubtless only the two-thirds inch or 16 mm. and the one-sixth inch or

4 mm. objectives are all that have been used in previous microscopic

work, while for examining bacteria a one-twelfth inch or 2 mm. is

necessary. It will have been observed that the higher the power of

the objective the smaller is the front lens or object glass and

consequently the less is the amount of light which enters. With the use

of the one-twelfth inch or 2 mm. objective it is necessary to employ

two devices for increasing the amount of light entering it, with which

the student is probably not familiar. One of these is to place a drop

of cedar oil between the front lens and the object and to immerse the

lens in this oil--hence the term “oil-immersion objective;” the other

is the substage or Abbé condenser. The latter is a system of lenses

placed below the stage and so constructed as to bring parallel rays of

light--daylight--from an area much larger than the face of the front

lens of the objective to a focus on the object to be examined, thus

adding very greatly to the amount of light entering the objective.

Since the condenser brings _parallel_ rays to a focus on the object,

the _flat-mirror_ is always used with the condenser when working with

daylight. With _artificial light close_ to the microscope, the concave

mirror may be used to make the divergent rays more nearly parallel and

thus give better illumination.

The function of immersion oil is to prevent the dispersion of

considerable light that would otherwise occur owing to refraction

as the light passes up through the slide and into the air. The

accompanying diagram will help to make this clearer (Fig. 137). A ray

of light (_A B_) coming through the slide will be refracted in the

direction _B C_ if the medium has a lower refractive index than the

slide, as air has, and hence will not enter the objective _O_. If,

however, there is interposed between the objective and the slide a

medium which has the same refractive index as the slide, as immersion

oil has, then the ray will continue in the same direction (_B D_) at

the point _B_ and hence enter the objective. Evidently the immersion

oil causes much more light to enter the front lens and makes the field

brighter and at the same time prevents considerable refraction and

dispersion of light from the object seen and hence this appears more

distinct and sharply defined. The Abbé condenser and the oil-immersion

objective are practically always used in the microscopic study of

bacteria (Fig. 138).

[Illustration: FIG. 137.--Diagram of use of immersion oil.]

[Illustration: FIG. 138.--Diagram of paths of rays of microscope.]

HANGING DROP SLIDE.

It is sometimes necessary to examine living bacteria and for this

purpose the device known as the “hanging drop slide” is used (Fig.

139). The slide has a slight concave depression ground in the middle

of one face. A ring of vaseline is placed around this depression with

the loop needle. On a clean cover-glass, large enough to fit over the

ring of vaseline, several drops of a broth culture, or of material

from a solid culture suspended in broth or physiological normal salt

solution are placed. The slide is inverted on the cover-glass in such

a way that the ring of vaseline seals the latter to the slide. When

the whole preparation is quickly turned cover side up, the drops are

seen “hanging” to the under side of the cover over the depression in

the slide. In examining such a preparation with the microscope great

care is necessary in order to focus on the bacteria, without breaking

the cover. To see the organisms distinctly the _lower iris diaphragm of

the condenser must be nearly closed_, so that the light coming through

consists mainly of parallel vertical rays, otherwise the transparent

bacteria themselves refract and diffract the light and appear blurred

and indistinct. By studying living bacteria with this device it can

be determined whether they are motile or not. The motility should not

be confounded with the familiar “Brownian movement” of all minute

insoluble inert particles which non-motile living bacteria and

also dead bacteria show. The hanging drop slide is of value in the

measurement of bacteria, since this is properly done on the living

organism. Measurement is done with a calibrated ocular micrometer as in

other kinds of measurement with the microscope with which the student

is presumably familiar. The direct effect of various agents on living

bacteria as light, electricity, heat, etc., in the study of “tropisms”

and “taxes” has been investigated on various modifications of the

above-described hanging drop slide.

[Illustration: FIG. 139.--Hanging drop slide.]

Cell forms and cell groupings may be studied in the same way but

these features are best determined on _stained_ preparations in many

instances.

“Dark field” illumination and the ultramicroscope are of great value in

the study of living bacteria and other minute objects, but apparatus

of this type would scarcely be used by the student in an introductory

course, so that they will not be discussed in the present volume.

STAINING.

The main use of the microscope in bacteriology is in the study of

_stained preparations_ of the organisms. Staining makes bacteria opaque

and hence more easily seen than the transparent unstained forms. Some

methods of staining also show morphological structures which are either

imperfectly recognized in the unstained cell, spores, or are not

visible at all--capsules, metachromatic granules, flagella. Finally

certain bacteria are colored by special methods of staining which do

not affect others, so that under proper conditions these bacteria may

be recognized by staining methods alone--tubercle bacilli in the organs

of animals.

The phenomena of staining are essentially chemical, though sometimes

the chemical union is a very weak one, even resembling an absorption of

the dye rather than true chemical union--most watery stains. In other

cases the chemical compounds formed are decidedly stable and are not

decomposed even by strong mineral acids--staining of tubercle bacilli

and other “acid-fast” organisms. In still other cases the principal

action is a precipitation on the surface of the object stained--methods

for staining flagella.

In many methods of staining in addition to the dyes used other

substances are added to the solution which assist in fixing the dye in

or on the organism stained. Such substances are called _mordants_. The

principal mordants used are alkalies, anilin, carbolic acid, iodine,

metallic salts, tannic acid.

While it is true that some bacteria may be stained by that standard

histological nuclear dye, hematoxylin, it is of little value for this

purpose. Practically all bacteriological stains are solutions of the

_anilin dyes_. These dyes, as is well known, are of nearly every

conceivable color and shade but relatively very few are used in

bacteriological work. The beginning student will rarely use solutions

of other than the three dyes _fuchsin_ (red), _methylene blue_ and

_gentian violet_ for staining bacteria, with occasionally Bismarck

brown, or eosin, or safranin as tissue contrast stains.

The bacteriological dyes are kept “in stock” as saturated solutions in

95 per cent. alcohol which are _never used as stains_, but merely for

convenience in making the various staining solutions.

The approximate percentages of the three common dyes in such solutions

are indicated in the following table adapted from Woods _Chemical and

Microscopical Diagnosis_, Third Edition, 1917, Appendix:

Fuchsin 3.0%

Gentian Violet 4.8%

Methylene Blue 2.0%

The stains made from these dyes which are in most common use are the

following:

1. Aqueous (watery) gentian violet solution.

Saturated alcoholic solution of gentian violet 1 part

Distilled water 20 parts

Mix well and filter.

2. Anilin gentian violet.

Saturated alcoholic solution of gentian violet 1 part

Anilin water (see below) 10 parts

Mix well and filter.

3. Anilin Fuchsin.

Saturated alcoholic solution of fuchsin 1 part

Anilin water (see below) 10 parts

Mix and filter.

These stains rarely keep longer than ten days in the laboratory (unless

kept in the ice-box) and must be made fresh on the first sign of a

deposit on the glass of the container.

=Anilin Water.=--Anilin water is made by putting 3 or 4 cc of anilin

“oil” in a 120 cc. flask, adding 100 cc of distilled water, shaking

vigorously for a minute or so and filtering through a wet filter, in

other words, a saturated solution of anilin in water.

4. Löffler’s (methylene) blue.

Saturated alcoholic solution of methylene blue 3 parts

Aqueous solution of NaOH (or KOH), 1 to 10,000 10 „

Mix and filter.

5. Carbol-fuchsin (Ziehl’s solution).

Saturated alcoholic solution of fuchsin 1 part

5 per cent. aqueous solution of carbolic acid 10 parts

Mix and filter.

6. Gabbet’s (methylene) blue (solution).

Dry methylene blue 4 parts

Concentrated H₂SO₄ 25 „

Distilled water 75 „

Dissolve the dry dye in the acid and add the solution to the

distilled water and filter.

[Illustration: FIG. 140.--Author’s staining set. Square bottles are set

in square holes in the block. The capacity of each bottle is 30 cc.]

Staining solutions are conveniently kept in square dropping bottles

inserted in a block as shown in Fig. 140. This form of holder

necessitates the use of _one hand only_ in securing the stain and

dropping it on the preparation.

The actual staining of bacteriological preparations can be learned only

by repeated laboratory practice, yet the following methods have given

such uniform results in class work that it is felt they are not out of

place in a text-book.

=Preparation of the “Film.”=--The author learned to stain bacteria,

on the “cover-glass” but does not recall having used this method in

fifteen years and does not teach it to his students. All staining is

done on the slide. To prepare a film from a solid culture medium the

procedure is as follows:

First, be sure the slide is clean and _free from grease_. This is

accomplished most readily by scouring a few minutes with finely

ground pumice stone and a little water, then washing and drying with

a grease-free cloth, handkerchief, or piece of cheese-cloth. With the

“loop” needle place in the middle of the slide a small loop of water.

This is best done by filling the loop by dipping in water, then tapping

it gently so that all that remains is the water that just fills the

loop level full, and this amount is placed on the slide by touching

the flat side of the loop to the glass. Then the _straight needle_ is

sterilized, dipped into the culture and just touched once into the

small drop of water on the slide. The remainder of the culture on the

straight needle is then burned off and the needle is used to spread the

drop of water containing the bacteria into a thin even film, which will

result, provided the slide is free from grease. This is dried and then

“fixed” by passing three times through the Bunsen flame at intervals of

about one second, passing through slowly for thick slides and a little

more rapidly for thin ones. If the culture is in a liquid medium, the

use of the loop of water is unnecessary; a loop of the fluid from the

surface, middle or bottom as the culture indicates is spread out to a

thin film, dried and fixed.

After the film is fixed the stain desired is dropped on, allowed

to act for the proper time, which will depend on the stain and the

preparation, washed in water, dried thoroughly and examined with the

oil-immersion lens, without a cover. If it is desired to preserve the

preparation it may then be mounted in balsam. This is not necessary, as

they keep just as well, provided the immersion oil is removed. To do

this, fold a piece of filter paper so that at least three thicknesses

result. Lay this on the slide and press firmly several times, when the

surplus oil will be taken up by the paper. Slides not mounted in balsam

are more apt to become dusty than those that are. This is the only

disadvantage.

=Gram’s Method of Staining.=--It has been ascertained that some

bacteria contain a substance, possibly a protein, which forms a

compound with gentian violet and iodine, which compound is insoluble in

alcohol, and other bacteria do not contain this substance. Consequently

when bacteria are stained by Gram’s method (given below), those that

contain this chemical remain colored, while if it is not present the

dye is washed out by the alcohol and the bacteria are colorless and may

be stained by a contrast stain. The bacteria which stain by this method

are said to “take Gram’s” or to be “Gram-positive,” while those that

decolorize are called “Gram-negative.” The method is:

1. Prepare the film as above given.

2. Stain with fresh anilin gentian violet 1 minute.

3. Wash in tap water.

4. Cover with Gram’s solution 1 minute.

5. Wash in tap water.

6. Wash with 95 per cent. alcohol three times or until no more color

comes out.

7. Dry and examine.

Gram’s solution is:

I 1 part

KI 2 parts

H₂O 300 „

This method is excellent for differentiating Gram-positive and

Gram-negative organisms on the same slide. First stain by this

method and after washing with alcohol stain with a counter-stain,

carbol-fuchsin diluted ten to fifteen times with water is excellent.

The Gram-positive bacteria are violet and the Gram-negative are red.

It is also of great value in staining Gram-positive bacteria in

tissues, but the sections should be stained about five minutes in

the anilin gentian violet and be left about two minutes in the Gram’s

solution. Sections are to be counter-stained in Bismarck brown, dilute

eosin or safranin solutions and cleared in oil of bergamot, lavender or

origanum and not in clove oil or carbol-xylol, as these latter dissolve

out the dye from the bacteria.

=Staining of Spores in the Rod.=--Prepare the films as usual. Cover

with carbol-fuchsin, using plenty of stain so that it will not dry on

the slide; heat until vapor arises, not to boiling; cool until the

stain becomes cloudy and heat again until the stain clears, and repeat

once more; wash in tap water and then wash in 1 per cent. H₂SO₄ three

times, dropping on plenty of acid, tilting and running this over the

slide three times and then pour off and use fresh acid and repeat this

once. Wash thoroughly in _distilled_ water, then stain with Löffler’s

blue one to three minutes. Wash, dry and examine. The spores should be

bright red in a blue rod.

This method will give good results if care is taken to secure cultures

of the right age. If the culture is too old the spores will all be free

outside the rods, while if too young they will decolorize with the

acid. For _Bacillus subtilis_ and _Bacillus anthracis_, cultures on

agar slants forty-eight hours in the 37° incubator are just right. For

the spores of _Clostridium tetani_, the culture should be three days

old, but may be as old as a week.

=Staining of “Acid-fast” Bacilli.=--_Mycobacterium tuberculosis,

Mycobacterium of Johne’s disease, “grass” and “butter bacilli,”

Mycobacterium lepræ, Mycobacterium smegmatis._

_Gabbet’s method_:

1. Prepare the film as usual.

2. Stain with carbol-fuchsin as given above for spores.

3. Wash with tap water.

4. Decolorize and stain at the same time with Gabbet’s blue, two or

three minutes.

5. Wash, dry and examine.

The sulphuric acid in Gabbet’s blue removes the carbol-fuchsin from

everything except the “acid-fast” bacteria, which remain red, and the

blue stains the decolorized bacteria and nuclei of any tissue cells

present.

_Ziehl-Neelson method_:

1, 2, 3, as in Gabbet’s method.

4. Decolorize with 10 per cent. HCl until washing with water shows

only a faint pink color left on slide.

5. Wash thoroughly.

6. Stain with Löffler’s blue one or two minutes.

7. Wash, dry and examine.

The results are the same as with Gabbet’s method.

=Staining of Capsules.=--_Räbiger’s Method._--Films of the organism

to show capsules should be _freshly prepared, dried but not fixed_.

Material is usually obtained from milk or blood. A drop of the fluid

is placed on the middle of a slide about one-fourth of the distance

from one end. The narrow edge of another clean slide is placed in this

drop and then drawn lengthwise across the slide with firm pressure.

This gives a _thin layer_ which is necessary if good results are to

be expected. The preparation is covered with a _freshly prepared_

saturated solution of gentian violet in formalin and this allowed

to stain for 30 seconds. Then wash _lightly_, dry and examine. The

organisms appear deeply violet and much larger than with ordinary

stains and capsules are well stained and show well.

_Welch’s Method._--Prepare films as in the above method. Cover with

glacial acetic acid for 10 to 20 seconds. Wash off the acid with

carbol-fuchsin. Wash the stain off with physiological normal salt

solution (0.85 per cent.) until all surplus stain is removed. Dry and

examine. Capsules and bacteria are red.

=Staining of Flagella.=--The rendering of flagella visible is

considered one of the most difficult processes in staining. Experience

of a number of years during which whole classes numbering from one

hundred to three hundred students accomplish this result shows that it

is no more difficult than many other staining processes. The essentials

are: (1) clean slides, (2) young cultures on agar slopes, (3) freshly

prepared mordant and stain which are kept free from precipitate,

(4) gentle heating. The author’s students are furnished only stock

materials and make their own cultures, mordants and stains.

The slides are cleaned with pumice in the usual way. An agar slope

culture of the organism to be stained from six to twenty-four hours

old is selected. A bit of the culture is removed and placed in a

watch-glass of water. The bacteria are allowed to diffuse of themselves

without stirring. After several minutes a loop of this water is removed

and three streaks are made across the slide, one in the middle and one

on each side of this about one-quarter of an inch from it. This gives

well scattered bacteria in one of the three streaks at least and very

little other material on the slide to cause precipitates. The slide is

carefully dried and fixed and then covered with an abundance of the

mordant by filtering through a small filter onto the slide so that the

mordant shows transparent on the slide. The preparation is then gently

warmed and cooled three times, adding mordant if necessary. _Do not

heat to steaming._ After mordanting for about five minutes the excess

is washed off under the tap. It is a good plan to hold the slide level

and allow the water to run into the center of the mordant and flow it

off. Inclining the slide is apt to cause the film on the surface of the

mordant to settle down on the slide and spoil the preparation. After

the mordant is washed off and all traces of it removed with a clean

cloth if necessary the stain is applied and gently heated and cooled

the same way for from three to five minutes. The preparation is then

washed, dried and examined.

The mordant used is a modification of Löffler’s which is somewhat

simpler in preparation since the stock solution of FeCl₃ is more

permanent than FeSO₄ solution.

Mordant sufficient for one student:

5 per cent. solution of FeCl₃ 20.0 cc

25 per cent. solution of tannic acid 20.0 cc

Anilin fuchsin 4.0 cc

Normal NaOH 1.5 cc

The solution of FeCl₃ is made up in the cold and must be perfectly

clear. The tannic acid solution must be thoroughly boiled and filtered

until clear. The iron and the acid are carefully mixed, boiled and

filtered clear. The anilin fuchsin must be added slowly with constant

stirring and the mixture boiled and filtered. The NaOH is added in the

same way and this mixture boiled and filtered. The final mordant should

not leave a film on a clean slide when poured on and allowed to run

off. Unless the mordant is in this condition and perfectly clear, it

should not be used, but a new one must be made up. Time and care in the

preparation of the mordant are essential.

The stain to follow this mordant is anilin fuchsin.

=Staining of Metachromatic Granules.=--_Neisser’s Method._ Prepare the

film in the usual way. Stain with Neisser’s stain a few seconds only.

Wash and stain with Bismarck brown a few seconds only.

_Neisser’s Stain_:

Sat. alcoholic solution of methylene blue 1.0 part

Glacial acetic acid 2.5 parts

Distilled water 50.0 parts

_Bismarck Brown_:

Bismarck brown (dry dye) 2 parts

Distilled Water 1000 parts

By the use of the hanging drop slide and the methods of staining just

described all the various morphological features of the bacterial cell

may be ascertained.

It is necessary when _cell groupings_ as characteristic of definite

modes of division are to be determined to make slides from a liquid

culture, as broth. Place a drop of the material, preferably from the

bottom of the tube in most instances, from the top in case a pellicle

or scum is formed on the surface, on the slide and allow this to dry

_without spreading it out_, fix, wash gently with water, then stain

lightly with Löffler’s blue. Such slides also show characteristic

_cell forms_ as well. Slides should be made from solid media to show

variations in form and size and involution forms. These latter are

especially apt to occur on potato media.

CHAPTER XX.

STUDY OF THE PHYSIOLOGY OF BACTERIA.

Of the environmental conditions influencing the growth of bacteria the

following are the chief ones ordinarily determined:

_A._ Temperature.--The optimum temperature for growth is usually

about the temperature of the natural environment and ordinarily one

determines merely whether the organism grows at body temperature (37°)

and at room temperature (20°) or not. For exact work the maximum,

minimum and optimum temperature must be ascertained by growing in

“incubators” with varying temperatures.

A bacteriological incubator is an apparatus for growing bacteria at a

constant temperature. This may be any temperature within the limits for

bacterial growth. If temperatures above that of an ordinary room are

desired, some source of artificial heat is needed. Electricity, gas or

oil may be used. A necessary adjunct is some device for maintaining

the temperature constant, a “thermoregulator” or “thermostat.” For

lower temperatures a cooling arrangement must be installed. For the

great part of bacteriological work only two temperatures are used, 20°

so-called “room temperature” (this applies to European “rooms” not to

American) and 37° or body temperature. Incubators for 37° of almost any

size and style desired may be secured from supply houses and need not

be further described. Figs. 141 and 142 illustrate some of the types.

For use with large classes “incubator rooms” are to be preferred. The

author has one such room for 37° work with 200 compartments for student

use which did not cost over $60 to install.

[Illustration: FIG. 141.--Small laboratory incubator, gas heated.]

[Illustration: FIG. 142.--Electric incubator.]

The styles of incubators for lower temperatures, 20° and below, are not

so numerous nor so satisfactory. The author has constructed a device

which answers every purpose for a small class. The diagram, Fig. 143,

explains it.

[Illustration: FIG. 143.--Diagram of fittings for a cold incubator.

_1._ small tank for constant head, about 1 foot in each dimension. _a_,

inflow; _b_, overflow; _c_, lead pipe. _2_, refrigerator. _a′_, ice;

_b′_, flat coil under ice; _c′_, outflow to incubator. _3_, incubator.

_a″_, cold water inflow; _b″_, overflow; thermometer and burner

omitted. The diagram explains the construction. The water cooled to

about 14° with artificial ice by flowing through the lead coil under

the ice, flows into the incubator which may be heated and regulated in

the usual way.]

The thermal death-point is determined by exposing the organisms in

thin tubes of broth at varying temperatures for ten-minute periods and

then plating out to determine growth. The effect of heat may also be

determined by exposing at a given temperature, _e.g._, 60°, for varying

lengths of time and plating out.

_B._ Oxygen relations--whether the organism is aërobic, anaërobic, or

facultative is determined by inoculation in gelatin or agar puncture or

stab cultures and noting whether the most abundant growth is at the

top, the bottom or all along the line of inoculation.

_C._ Reaction of the medium--acid, alkaline or neutral as influencing

the rate and amount of growth.

_D._ The kind of medium on which the organism grows best.

_E._ The effect of injurious chemicals, as various disinfectants, on

the growth.

_F._ Osmotic pressure conditions, though modifying decidedly the growth

of bacteria, are not usually studied as aids in their recognition, nor

are the effects of various forms of energy, such as light, electricity,

_x_-rays, etc.

Among the “Physiological Activities” discussed in Chapters IX-XII those

which, in addition to the staining reactions described, are of most

use in the identification of non-pathogenic bacteria are the first ten

listed below. For pathogenic bacteria the entire thirteen are needed.

1. Liquefaction of gelatin.

2. Digestion of blood serum.

3. Coagulation and digestion of milk.

4. Acid or gaseous fermentation in milk, or both.

5. Acid or gaseous fermentation of various carbohydrates in

carbohydrate broth, or both.

6. Production of indol in “indol solution.”

7. Production of pigments on various media.

8. Reduction of nitrates to nitrites, ammonia, or free nitrogen.

9. Production of enzymes as illustrated in the above activities.

10. Appearance of growth on different culture media.

11. Production of free toxins as determined by injection of animals

with broth cultures filtered free from bacteria.

12. Causation of disease as ascertained by the injection of animals

with the bacteria themselves, and recovery of the organism from the

animals.

13. Formation of specific antibodies as determined by the

proper injection of animals with the organism or its products

and the subsequent testing of the blood serum of the inoculated

animals.

For special kinds of bacteria other activities must be determined

(oxidation, nitrate and nitrite formation, action of sulphur and iron

bacteria, etc.).

The first nine activities are determined by inoculating the different

culture media already described and observing the phenomena indicated,

making chemical tests where necessary.

APPEARANCE OF GROWTH ON DIFFERENT CULTURE MEDIA.

In addition to those changes that are associated with the manifestation

of different physiological activities, many bacteria, show

characteristic appearances on the various culture media which are of

value in their identification.

Too much stress should not be laid on these appearances alone, however,

since slight variations, particularly in solid media due especially to

the age of the medium, may change decidedly the appearance of a colony.

This is true of variations in the amount of moisture on agar plates.

Colonies which are ordinarily round and regular may assume very diverse

shapes, if there chance to be an excess of moisture on the surface.

Also in slope and puncture cultures on the various solid media much

variation results from the amount of material on the inoculation needle

and just how the puncture is made, or the needle drawn over the slope.

These variations are largely prevented by the use of standard media and

by inoculating by standard methods. The Laboratory Committee of the

American Public Health Association has proposed standard methods for

all culture media and tests and for methods of inoculation, and these

have been generally adopted in this country for comparative work.

Likewise the Society of American Bacteriologists has at different times

(1904, 1914, 1917) adopted “descriptive charts” for detailing all the

characteristics of a given organism. A committee is at present working

on a revision of the 1917 chart to be presented at the 1920 meeting.

One of the earlier charts which includes a glossary of descriptive

terms is inserted in this chapter.

Among the cultural appearances the following are of most importance:

[Illustration: FIG. 144.--Broth cultures × 2/3. _1_ uninoculated

transparent broth; _2_, broth cloudy from growth of organisms; _3_,

broth slightly cloudy with a deposit in bottom; _4_, broth slightly

cloudy with a heavy membrane at the surface.]

[Illustration: FIG. 145.--A filiform stab or puncture culture. × 3/5.]

[Illustration: FIG. 146.--A beaded stab or puncture culture. × 1/2.]

[Illustration: FIG. 147.--A villous stab or puncture culture. × 1/2.]

In broth cultures the presence or absence of growth on the surface

and the amount of the same. Whether the broth is rendered cloudy or

remains clear, and whether there is a deposit at the bottom or not

(Fig. 144). An abundant surface growth with little or nothing below

indicates a strict aërobe, while a growth or deposit at bottom and a

clear or nearly clear medium above, an anaërobe. These appearances are

for the first few days only of growth. If the broth is disturbed, or

after the culture stands for several days many surface growths tend to

sink to the bottom. So an actively motile organism causes in general

a cloudiness, especially if the organism is a facultative anaërobe,

which tends to clear up by precipitation after several days when the

organisms lose their motility. Non-motile facultative anaërobes

usually cloud the broth also, but settle out more rapidly than the

motile ones.

In gelatin and agar punctures the oxygen relationship is shown by

surface growth for aërobes, growth near the bottom of the puncture

for anaërobes, and a fairly uniform growth all along the line of

inoculation for facultative anaërobes. In the case of these last

organisms, a preference for more or less oxygen is indicated by the

approach to the aërobic or anaërobic type of growth.

[Illustration: FIG. 148 FIG. 149 FIG. 150 FIG. 151

FIG. 148.--Crateriform liquefaction of gelatin. × 1/2.

FIG. 149.--Funnelform liquefaction of gelatin. × 1/2.

FIG. 150.--Saccate liquefaction of gelatin. × 1/2.

FIG. 151.--Stratiform liquefaction of gelatin. × 1/2.]

Along the line of puncture the commonest types are _filiform_ (Fig.

145), which indicates a uniform growth; _beaded_ (Fig. 146), or small

separate colonies; _villous_ (Fig. 147), delicate lateral outgrowths

which do not branch; _arborescent_, tree-like growths branching

laterally from the line. In agar these branchings are usually short and

stubby, or technically, _papillate_.

[Illustration: FIG. 152.--Filiform slope culture. × 1/2.]

[Illustration: FIG. 153.--Filiform, slightly spreading, slope culture.

× 1/2.]

[Illustration: FIG. 154.--Beaded slope culture. × 1/2.]

Further, in the gelatin puncture the liquefaction which occurs is

frequently characteristic. It may be _crateriform_ (Fig. 148), a

shallow saucer at the surface; or _funnel-shaped_ (Fig. 149); or it

may be of uniform width all along the puncture, _i.e._, _saccate_ (Fig.

150); or it may be _stratiform_, (Fig. 151), _i.e._, the liquefaction

extends to the sides of the tube and proceeds uniformly downward.

[Illustration: FIG. 155 FIG. 156 FIG. 157 FIG. 158

FIG. 155.--Effuse slope culture. × 1/2.

FIG. 156.--Rhizoid slope culture. × 1/2.

FIG. 157.--Rugose slope culture. × 1/2.

FIG. 158.--Verrucose slope culture. × 1/2.]

On agar, potato and blood serum slope tubes the amount of growth, its

form and elevation, the character of the surface, and the consistency

should be carefully noted, and in some few cases the character of the

edge. Figures 152 to 158 show some of the commoner types.

[Illustration: FIG. 159.--Punctiform colonies on a plate. × 1/2.]

[Illustration: FIG. 160.--A rhizoid colony on a plate. Natural size.]

[Illustration: FIG. 161.--Ameboid colonies on a plate. × 1/2.]

[Illustration: FIG. 162.--Large effuse colony on a plate. The edge is

lacerated. Incidentally the colony shows the rate of growth for six

successive days. × 2/3.]

[Illustration: FIG. 163.--Colony with edge entire as seen under the

low-power objective. × 100.]

[Illustration: FIG. 164.--Colony with edge coarsely granular as seen

under the low-power objective. × 100.]

[Illustration: FIG. 165.--Colony with edge curled as seen under the

low-power objective. × 100.]

[Illustration: FIG. 166.--Colony with edge rhizoid as seen under the

low-power objective. × 100.]

[Illustration: FIG. 167.--A small deep rhizoid colony as seen under the

low-power objective. × 100.]

On agar and gelatin plates made so that the colonies are well isolated,

the form of the latter, the rate of their growth, the character of the

edge and of the surface, the elevation and the internal structure

as determined by a low-power lens are often of almost diagnostic

value. Also in the case of the gelatin plates, the character of the

liquefaction is important. Figs. 159 to 167 show some of the commoner

characteristics to be noted.

[Illustration: FIG. 168.--A small mold colony natural size as viewed by

transmitted light.]

[Illustration: FIG. 169.--The same colony as viewed by reflected light.]

[Illustration: FIG. 170.--A portion of the thin edge of the same colony

as seen with the lower-power objective. × 100.]

[Illustration: FIG. 171.--A single fruiting body (sporangium) from the

same colony as seen under the lower-power objective. × 100.]

Colonies of mold frequently appear on plates. These are readily

differentiated from bacterial colonies after a little experience. With

the naked eye usually the fine radiations of the edge of the colony

are apparent. The surface appears duller and by reflected light more

or less “fuzzy.” With the low-power objective the relatively large,

branching threads of the mold (mycelia) show distinctly. Also the large

fruiting bodies (sporangia) are easily distinguished. Figs. 168 to 171

illustrate a common black mold (_Rhizopus nigricans_).

CHAPTER XXI.

ANIMAL INOCULATION.

Animal inoculation has been referred to (1) as a method of assisting

in the preparation of pure cultures of pathogenic organisms; (2) as a

means of testing the poisonous properties of substances produced in

bacterial cultures; (3) in order to test the ability of an organism to

cause a disease; (4) for the production of various antibodies; it may

be added (5) that some bacteria produce in the smaller experimental

animals lesions which do not occur in animals naturally infected, but

which nevertheless are characteristic for the given organism. The best

illustration is the testicular reaction of young male guinea-pigs to

intraperitoneal injections of glanders bacilli. Experimental animals

are also inoculated (6) to test the potency of various bacterial and

other biological products, as toxins, antitoxins, etc.

Guinea-pigs are the most widely used experimental animals because they

are easily kept and are susceptible to so many diseases on artificial

inoculation. Rabbits are used very largely also, as are white mice. For

special purposes white rats, pigeons, goats and swine are necessary.

For commercial products horses (antitoxins) and cattle (smallpox

vaccine) are employed. In the study of many human diseases the higher

monkeys and even the anthropoid apes are necessary, since none of the

lower animals are susceptible.

The commonest method of animal inoculation is undoubtedly the

_subcutaneous_. This is accomplished most readily with the hypodermic

needle. The skin at the point selected (usually in guinea-pigs the

lateral posterior half of the abdominal surface, in mice the back near

the root of the tail) is pinched up to avoid entering the muscles and

the needle quickly inserted. Clipping the hairs and washing with an

antiseptic solution should precede the inoculation as routine practice.

Frequently a small “skin pocket” is all that is needed. The hair is

clipped off, the skin pinched up with small forceps and a slight snip

with sharp scissors is made. The material may be inserted into this

pocket with a heavy platinum needle. _Cutaneous_ inoculation is made

by shaving the skin and rubbing the material onto the shaved surface

or scratching with a scalpel or special scarifier, but without drawing

blood, and then rubbing in the material to be inoculated.

_Intravenous_ injections are made with larger animals. In rabbits the

posterior external auricular is a convenient vein. In larger animals

the external jugular is used.

_Intraperitoneal_, _-thoracic_, _-cardiac_, _-ocular_, _-muscular_

injections, and injections into the parenchyma of internal organs are

accomplished with the hypodermic needle. In the case of the first two,

injury to contained organs should be carefully avoided. Intracardiac

injection, or aspiration of the heart to secure blood, requires

considerable practice to be successful without causing the death of the

animal at once through internal hemorrhage. In _subdural_ injections

into the cranial cavity it is necessary to trephine the skull first,

while such injections into the spinal canal may be accomplished between

the vertebra with needles longer and stronger than the usual hypodermic

needle. Occasionally animals are caused to _inhale_ the organisms, or

are _fed_ cultures mixed with the feed.

SECURING AND TRANSPORTING MATERIAL FROM ANIMALS FOR BACTERIOLOGICAL

EXAMINATION.

If the site of the lesion is readily accessible from the exterior,

material from the _living animal_ should be collected with sterile

instruments and kept in sterile utensils until the necessary tests can

be made. Testing should be done on material as soon after collection

as possible, in all cases, to avoid the effects of “decomposition”

bacteria.

If the blood is to be investigated it may be aspirated from a

peripheral vein with a sterile hypodermic syringe of appropriate size

or allowed to flow through a sterile canula into sterile receptacles.

The site of the puncture should be shaved and disinfected before the

instrument is introduced.

Discharges of whatever kind should likewise be collected in sterile

receptacles and examined as soon as may be.

If internal organs are to be examined it is best to kill a moribund

animal than to wait for death, since after death, and in severe

infections even sometimes before, the tissues are rapidly invaded by

saprophytic bacteria from the alimentary and respiratory tracts which

complicate greatly the isolation of the specific organism. Hence the

search for specific bacteria in carcasses or organs several hours after

death is frequently negative. Animal inoculation with such material is

very often followed by sepsis or septicemia in a few hours, so that the

specific organism has no opportunity to manifest itself.

In securing material for cultures from internal organs it is a good

plan to burn the surface of the organ with a gas or alcohol flame, or

to sear it with a hot instrument to kill surface organisms, then make

the incision or puncture through the burned area and secure material

from the interior of the organ. Such punctures made with a stiff

platinum needle frequently give pure cultures of the organism sought.

Slides may be made from such material and culture media inoculated at

once.

Since a bacteriological diagnosis depends most commonly on growing the

organisms, it is evident that material sent for examination must _never

be treated with an antiseptic or preservative_. If decomposition is to

be feared the only safe procedure is to _pack the material in ice_ and

forward in this way.

_Tuberculous material from the parenchyma_ of internal organs may be

forwarded in a preservative (not _formalin_, since this makes it very

difficult to stain the bacteria) as _in this special_ case a very

positive diagnosis may be made by staining alone. Even here it is

better to _pack in ice_ in order that the diagnosis by staining may be

confirmed by inoculating the living organisms into guinea-pigs.

In the case of material _from a rabid animal_ and many protozoal

diseases the rule against preservatives is not absolute, since staining

is a reliable diagnostic means. Even in these cases it is often

desirable to inoculate animals, hence, as before stated, it is best to

make it a uniform practice to _pack material for examination in ice and

use no preservatives_.

PART IV.

GENERAL PATHOGENIC BACTERIOLOGY.

CHAPTER XXII.

INTRODUCTION.

Pathogenic Bacteriology treats of the unicellular microörganisms which

are responsible for disease conditions, _i.e._, pathological changes

in other organisms. Hence not only are bacteria considered, but also

other low vegetable forms, as yeasts and molds, likewise protozoa in

so far as they may be pathogenic. For this reason the term pathogenic

“Microbiology” has been introduced to include all these organisms. It

is largely for the reason that the methods devised for the study of

bacteria have been applied to the investigation of other microörganisms

that the term “bacteriology” was extended to cover the entire field.

The general discussion in this chapter is intended to include,

therefore, microörganisms of whatever kind pathogenic to animals.

The term pathogenic as applied to an organism must be understood in a

purely _relative_ sense, since there is no single organism that can

cause disease in all of a certain class, but each is limited to a more

or less narrow range. Some form of tuberculosis attacks nearly all

vertebrates, but no other classes of animals and no plants. Lockjaw or

tetanus attacks most mammals, but not any other vertebrates naturally.

Typhoid fever affects human beings; hog cholera, swine, etc. This point

is more fully discussed in Chapter XXIII but can not be too greatly

insisted upon.

“The greatest enemy to mankind is man.”

Exceptions to this statement do occur and are important and must be

considered in efforts to protect completely human beings from disease

(tuberculosis from cattle, glanders from horses, poisoning from spoiled

canned goods, anthrax from hair, hides, wool, of animals dead of the

disease), but the most common human diseases are derived from other

human beings directly or indirectly.

Diseases which are due to unicellular pathogenic microörganisms are

called _infectious_ diseases, while if such diseases are transmitted

under natural conditions from organism to organism they are spoken of

as _contagious_ diseases. Most infectious diseases are contagious but

not all. Tetanus is a good illustration of a non-contagious infectious

disease. There are very few such diseases.

When a unicellular microörganism gains entrance into the body and

brings about any pathological changes there, the result is an

_infection_. Undoubtedly many pathogenic organisms get into the body

but never manifest their presence by causing disease conditions, hence

do not cause an infection. It is the pathological conditions which

result that constitute the infection, and not the mere _invasion_.

The time that elapses between the entrance of the organism and the

appearance of symptoms is called the _period of incubation_ and varies

greatly in different diseases.

The term _infestation_ is used to denote pathological conditions due to

_multicellular_ parasites. Thus an animal is _infested_ (not infected)

with tapeworms, roundworms, lice, mites, etc. Many of these conditions,

probably all, are contagious, _i.e._, transmissable naturally from

animal to animal. The word _contagious_ has been used in a variety

of ways to mean _communicated by direct contact_, communicated by a

living something (_contagium_) that might be carried to a distance

and finally _communicable_ in any manner, transmissable. The agency

of transmission may be very roundabout--as through a _special tick_

in Texas fever, a _mosquito_ in malaria, etc.,--or by direct personal

contact, as generally in venereal diseases. After all, though exactness

is necessary, it is better to learn all possible about the _means of

transmission of diseases_, than quibble as to the terms to be used.

An infectious disease may be _acute_ or _chronic_. An acute infection

is one which runs for a relatively short time and is “self-limited,”

so-called, _i.e._, the organisms cease to manifest their presence after

a time. In some acute infections the time is very short--German measles

usually runs five or six days. Typhoid fever may continue eight to

ten weeks, sometimes longer, yet it is an acute infectious disease.

It is not so much the time as the fact of _self-limitation_ that

characterizes acute infections.

In chronic infections there is little or no evidence of limitation of

the progress of the disease which may continue for years. Tuberculosis

is usually chronic. Leprosy in man is practically always so. Glanders

in horses is most commonly chronic; in mules and in man it is more apt

to be acute.

Many infections begin acutely and later change to the chronic type.

Syphilis in man is a good illustration.

The differences between acute and chronic infections are partly due

to the nature of the organism, partly to the number of organisms

introduced and the point of their introduction and partly to the

resistance of the animal infected.

An infectious disease is said to be _specific_ when one kind of

organism is responsible for its manifestations--as diphtheria due

to the _Corynebacterium diphtheriæ_, lockjaw due to _Clostridium

tetani_, Texas fever due to the _Piroplasma bigeminum_, etc. It is

_non-specific_ when it may be due to a variety of organisms, as

_enteritis_ (generally), _bronchopneumonia_, _wound infections_.

Henle, as early as 1840, stated certain principles that must be

established before a given organism can be accepted as the cause of a

specific disease. These were afterward restated by Koch, and have come

to be known as “Koch’s postulates.” They may be stated as follows:

1. The given organism must be found in all cases of the disease in

question.

2. No other organism must be found in all cases.

3. The organism must, when obtained in pure culture, reproduce the

disease in susceptible animals.

4. It must be recovered from such animals in pure culture and this

culture likewise reproduce the disease.

These postulates have not been fully met with reference to any disease,

but the principles embodied have been applied as far as possible

in all those infections which we recognize as specific, and whose

causative agent is accepted. In many diseases recognized as infectious

and contagious no organism has been found which is regarded as the

specific cause. In some of these the organism appears to be too small

to be seen with the highest powers of the microscope, hence they are

called “_ultramicroscopic_” organisms. Because these agents pass

through the finest bacterial filters, they are also frequently called

“_filterable_.” The term “_virus_” or “_filterable virus_” is likewise

applied to these “ultramicroscopic” and “filterable” agents.

The term _primary infection_ is sometimes applied to the first

manifestation of a disease, either specific or non-specific, while

_secondary_ refers to later developments. For example, a _secondary_

general infection may follow a _primary_ wound infection, or _primary_

lung tuberculosis be followed by _secondary_ generalized tuberculosis,

or _primary_ typhoid fever by a _secondary_ typhoid pneumonia. The

terms _primary_ and _secondary_ are also used where the body is

invaded by one kind of an organism and later on by another kind; thus

a _primary_ measles may be followed by _secondary_ infection of the

middle ear, or a _primary_ influenza may be followed by a _secondary_

pneumonia, or a _primary_ scarlet fever by a _secondary_ nephritis

(inflammation of the kidney). Where several organisms seem to be

associated simultaneously in causing the condition then the term _mixed

infection_ is used--in severe diphtheria, streptococci are commonly

associated with the _Corynebacterium diphtheriæ_. In many cases of

hog-cholera, mixed infections in the lungs and in the intestines are

common. Wound infections are usually _mixed_. _Auto-infection_ refers

to those conditions in which an organism commonly present in or on the

body in a latent or harmless condition gives rise to an infectious

process. If the _Bacterium coli_ normal to the intestine escapes into

the peritoneal cavity, or passes into the bladder, a severe peritonitis

or cystitis, respectively, is apt to result. “Boils” and “pimples”

are frequently autoinfections. Such infections are also spoken of as

_endogenous_ to distinguish them from those due to the entrance of

organisms from without--_exogenous_ infections. _Relapses_ are usually

instances of autoinfection.

Those types of _secondary infection_ where the infecting agent is

transferred from one disease focus to another or several other points

and sets up the infection there are sometimes called _metastases_. Such

are the transfer of tubercle bacilli from lung to intestine, spleen,

etc., the formation of abscesses in internal organs following a primary

surface abscess, the appearance of glanders nodules throughout various

organs following pulmonary glanders, etc.

The characteristic of a pathogenic microörganism which indicates

its ability to cause disease is called its _virulence_. If slightly

virulent, the effect is slight; if highly virulent, the effect is

severe, and may be fatal.

On the other hand, the characteristic of the host which indicates

its capacity for infection is called _susceptibility_. If slightly

susceptible, infection is slight, if highly susceptible, the infection

is severe.

Evidently the degree of infection is dependent in large measure on

the relation between the _virulence_ of the invading organism and the

_susceptibility_ of the host. High virulence and great susceptibility

mean a severe infection; low virulence and little susceptibility a

slight infection; while high virulence and little susceptibility or

low virulence and great susceptibility might mean a moderate infection

varying in either direction. Other factors influencing the degree of

infection are the number of organisms introduced, the point where they

are introduced and various conditions. These will be discussed in

another connection (Chapter XXV).

The study of pathogenic bacteriology includes the thorough study

of the individual organisms according to the methods already given

(Chapters XVIII-XXI) as an aid to diagnosis and subsequent treatment,

bacteriological or other, in a given disease. Of far greater

importance than the _treatment_, which in most infectious diseases

is not specific, is the _prevention_ and _ultimate eradication_ of

all infectious diseases. To accomplish these objects involves further

a study of the _conditions under which pathogenic organisms exist

outside the body_, _the paths of entrance into and elimination from

the body_ and those _agencies within the body itself_ which make it

_less susceptible to infection or overcome the infective agent after

its introduction_. That condition of the body itself which prevents any

manifestation of a virulent pathogenic organism after it has been once

introduced is spoken of as _immunity_ in the modern sense. Immunity is

thus the opposite of susceptibility and may exist in varying degrees.

That scientists are and have been for some years in possession of

sufficient knowledge to permit of the prevention and eradication

of most, if not all, of our infectious diseases can scarcely be

questioned. The practical application of this knowledge presents

many difficulties, the chief of which is the absence of a public

sufficiently enlightened to permit the expenditure of the necessary

funds. Time and educative effort alone can surmount this difficulty. It

will probably be years yet, but it will certainly be accomplished.

CHAPTER XXIII.

PATHOGENIC BACTERIA OUTSIDE THE BODY.

Pathogenic bacteria may exist outside the body of the host under a

variety of conditions as follows:

I. In or on inanimate objects or material.

(_a_) As true saprophytes.

(_b_) As facultative saprophytes.

(_c_) Though obligate parasites, they exist in a latent

state.

II. In or on other animals, or products from them:

A. Susceptible to the disease.

(_a_) Sick themselves.

(As far as human beings are concerned these are

mainly:

1. Other human beings for most diseases.

2. Rats for plague.

3. Dogs for rabies.

4. Horses for glanders.

5. Cattle, swine, parrots for tuberculosis).

(_b_) Recovered from illness.

(_c_) Never sick but “carriers.”

B. Not susceptible.

(_d_) Accidental carriers.

(_e_) Serving as necessary intermediate hosts for certain

stages of the parasite--this applies to _protozoal_

diseases only, as yet.

I.

(_a_) The bacilli of tetanus, malignant edema and the organisms of

“gas gangrene” are widely distributed. There is no evidence that their

entrance into the body is at all necessary for the continuation of

their life processes, or that one case of either of these diseases

ever has any connection with any other case; they are true saprophytes.

Manifestly it would be futile to attempt to prevent or eradicate such

diseases by attacking the organism in its natural habitat. _Clostridium

botulinum_, which causes a type of food poisoning in man, does not even

multiply in the body, but the disease symptoms are due to a soluble

toxin which is produced during its growth outside the body.

(_b_) Organisms like the bacterium of anthrax and the bacillus of

black-leg from their local occurrence seem to be distributed from

animals infected, though capable of a saprophytic existence outside the

body for years. These can no more be attacked during their saprophytic

existence than those just mentioned. Doubtless in warm seasons of the

year and in the tropics other organisms pathogenic to animals may live

and multiply in water or in damp soil where conditions are favorable,

just as the cholera organism in India, and occasionally the typhoid

bacillus in temperate climates do.

(_c_) Most pathogenic organisms, however, when they are thrown off

from the bodies of animals, remain quiescent, do not multiply, in fact

always tend to die out from lack of all that is implied in a “favorable

environment,” food, moisture, temperature, light, etc. Disinfection is

sometimes effective in this class of diseases in preventing new cases.

II. A.

(_a_) The most common infectious diseases of animals are transmitted

more or less directly from other animals of the same species. Human

beings get nearly all their diseases from other human beings who are

sick; horses, from other horses; cattle, from other cattle; swine,

from swine, etc. Occasionally transmission from one species to another

occurs. Tuberculosis of swine most frequently results from feeding

them milk of tuberculous cattle or from their eating the droppings of

such cattle. Human beings occasionally contract anthrax from wool,

hair and hides of animals dead of the disease or from postmortems

on such animals; glanders from horses; tuberculosis (in children)

from tuberculous milk; bubonic plague from rats; rabies practically

always from the bites of dogs and other rabid animals, etc. The

mode of limiting this class of diseases is evidently to isolate the

sick, disinfect their discharges and their _immediate_ surroundings,

sterilize such products as must be handled or used, kill lower animals

that are dangerous, and disinfect, bury properly, or destroy their

carcasses.

Classes of the sick that are especially dangerous for the spread of

disease are the mild cases and the undetected cases. These individuals

do not come under observation and hence not under control.

(_b_) This class of carriers offers a difficult problem in the

prevention of infectious diseases since they may continue to give off

the organisms indefinitely and thus infect others. Typhoid carriers

have been known to do so for fifty-five years. Cholera, diphtheria,

meningitis and other carriers are well known in human practice.

Carriers among animals have not been so frequently demonstrated,

but there is every reason for thinking that hog-cholera, distemper,

roup, influenza and other carriers are common. Carriers furnish the

explanation for many of the so-called “spontaneous” outbreaks of

disease among men and animals.

It is the general rule that those who are sick cease to carry the

organisms on recovery and it is the occasional ones who do not that are

the exceptions. In those diseases in which the organism is known it

can be determined by examination of the patient or his discharges how

long he continues to give off the causative agent. In those in which

the cause is unknown (in human beings, the commonest and most easily

transmitted diseases, scarlet fever, measles, German measles, mumps,

chicken-pox, small-pox, influenza), no such check is possible. It is

not known how long such individuals remain carriers. Hence isolation

and quarantine of such convalescents is based partly on experience

and partly on theory. It is highly probable that in the diseases just

mentioned transmission occurs in the _early stages only_, except

in small-pox and chicken-pox where the organism seems to be in the

pustules and transmission by means of material from these is possible,

though only by direct contact with it.

The fact that such individuals are _known to have had the disease_ is a

guide for control. The methods to be used are essentially the same as

for the sick, (_a_), though obviously such human carriers are much more

difficult to deal with since they are well.

(_c_) Another class of carriers is those who have never had the

disease. Such individuals are common and are very dangerous sources

of infection. Many of them have _associated with the sick or with

convalescents_ and these should always be suspected of harboring the

organisms. Their control differs in no way from that of class (_b_).

Unfortunately a history of such association is too often not available.

Modern transportation and modern social habits are largely responsible

for the nearly universal distribution of this type of carrier. Their

detection is probably the largest single problem in the prevention

of infectious diseases. A partial solution would be universal

bacteriological examination. In our present stage of progress this is

impossible and would not detect carriers of diseases of unknown cause.

The various classes of carriers just discussed are in a large part

responsible for the continued presence of the commoner diseases

throughout the country. The difficulties in control have been

mentioned. A complete solution of the problem is not yet obtained. The

army experience of the past few years in the control of infectious

diseases shows what may be done.

There is another class of carriers which might be called the “universal

carrier,” _i.e._, there are certain organisms which seem to be

constantly or almost constantly present in or on the human body. These

are _micrococci_, _streptococci_ and _pneumococci_, all _Gram positive_

organisms. They are ordinarily harmless parasites, but on occasion may

give rise to serious, even fatal, infection. Infected wounds, pimples,

boils, “common colds,” most “sore throats,” bronchitis, pneumonia are

pathological conditions that come in this class. Such infections are

usually autogenous. There is a constant interchange of these organisms

among individuals closely associated, so that all of a group usually

harbor the same type though no one individual can be called _the_

carrier. Whenever, for any reason, the resistance of an individual (see

Chaps. XXV et seq.) is lowered either locally or generally some of

these organisms are liable to gain a foothold and cause infection. It

sometimes happens that a strain of dangerous organisms may be developed

in an individual in this way which is passed around to others with its

virulence increased and thus cause an epidemic. Or, since all of the

group are living under the same conditions the resistance of all or

many of them may be lowered from the same general cause and an epidemic

result from the organism common to all (pneumonia after measles,

scarlet fever and influenza in camps). Protection of the individual is

chiefly a personal question, _i.e._, by keeping up the “normal healthy

tone” in all possible ways: The use of protective vaccines (Chap. XXX)

appears to be advisable in such instances (colds, pneumonia after

measles and influenza, inflammation of throat and middle ear following

scarlet fever and measles). Results obtained in this country during

the recent influenza epidemic have been conflicting but on the whole

appear to show that preventive vaccination against _pneumonia liable to

follow_ should be practiced.

It would seem that among groups of individuals where infection may be

expected the proper procedure would be to prepare autogenous vaccines

(Chapter XXX) from members of the group and vaccinate all with the

object of protecting them.

II. B.

(_d_) In this class come the “accidental carriers” like flies, fleas,

lice, bed-bugs, ticks, and other biting and blood-sucking insects,

vultures, buzzards, foxes, rats, and carrion-eating animals generally;

pet animals in the household, etc. Here the animals are not susceptible

to the given disease but become contaminated with the organisms

and then through defilement of the food or drink or contact with

individuals or with utensils pass the organisms on to the susceptible.

Some biting and blood-sucking insects transmit the organisms through

biting infected and non-infected animals successively. The spirilloses

and trypanosomiases seem to be transmitted in this way, though there

is evidence accumulating which may place these diseases in the next

class. Anthrax is considered in some instances to be transmitted by

flies and by vultures in the southern United States. Transmission

of typhoid, dysentery, cholera and other diseases by flies is well

established in man. Why not hog-cholera from farm to farm by flies,

English sparrows, pigeons feeding, or by turkey buzzards? Though this

would not be easy to prove, it seems reasonable.

Preventing contact of such animals with the discharges or with the

carcasses of those dead of the disease, destruction of insect carriers,

screening and prevention of fly breeding are obvious protective

measures.

(_e_) In this class come certain diseases for which particular

insects are necessary for the parasite in question, so that certain

stages in its life history may be passed therein. The surest means

for eradicating such diseases is the destruction of the insects

concerned. Up to the present no _bacterial_ disease is known in which

this condition exists, unless Rocky Mountain spotted fever and typhus

fever shall prove to be due to bacteria. Such diseases are all due to

protozoa. Among them are Texas fever, due to _Piroplasma bigeminum_

in this country which has been eradicated in entire districts by

destruction of the cattle tick (_Margaropus annulatus_).

Piroplasmoses in South Africa among cattle and horses, and in other

countries are transmitted in similar ways. Probably many of the

diseases due to spirochetes and trypanosomes are likewise transmitted

by _necessary_ insect intermediaries. In human medicine the eradication

of yellow fever from Panama and Cuba is due to successful warfare

against, a certain mosquito (_Stegomyia_). So the freeing of large

areas in different parts of the world from _malaria_ follows the

destruction of the mosquitoes. The prevention of typhus fever and

of trench fever by “delousing” methods is familiar from recent army

experience though for typhus this method has been practiced in Russia

for more than ten years to the author’s personal knowledge. The

campaign against disease in animals and man from insect sources must be

considered as still in its infancy. The full utilization of tropical

lands depends largely on the solution of this problem.

CHAPTER XXIV.

PATHS OF ENTRANCE OF PATHOGENIC ORGANISMS,

OR

CHANNELS OF INFECTION.

_A._ =The Skin.=--If the skin is healthy there is no opportunity for

bacteria to penetrate it. It is protected not only by the stratified

epithelium, but also in various animals, by coats of hair, wool,

feathers, etc. The secretion pressure of the healthy sweat and oil

glands acts as an effective bar even to motile bacteria. Nevertheless a

very slight injury only is sufficient to give normal surface parasites

and other pathogenics, accidentally or purposely brought in contact

with it, an opportunity for more rapid growth and even entrance

for general infection. Certain diseases due to higher fungi are

characteristically “skin diseases” and rarely become general--various

forms of favus, trichophyton infections, etc. A few disease organisms,

tetanus, malignant edema, usually get in through the skin; others,

black-leg, anthrax, quite commonly; and those diseases transmitted

by biting and blood-sucking insects, piroplasmoses, trypanosomiases,

spirilloses, scarcely in any other way. Defective secretion in the skin

glands from other causes, may permit lodgment and growth of bacteria

in them or in the hair follicles. “Pimples” and boils in man and local

abscesses occasionally in animals are illustrations. Sharp-edged and

freely bleeding wounds are less liable to be infected than contusions,

ragged wounds, burns, etc. The flowing blood washes out the wound and

the clotting seals it, while there is less material to be repaired

by the leukocytes and they are free to care for invading organisms

(phagocytosis). Pathogenic organisms, especially pus cocci, frequently

gain lodgment in the _milk glands_ and cause local (mastitis) or

general infection.

_B._ =Mucosæ directly continuous with the skin and lined with

stratified epithelium= are commonly well protected thereby and by the

secretions.

(_a_) The external auditory meatus is rarely the seat even of local

infection. The tympanic cavity is normally sterile, though it may

become infected by extension through the Eustachian tube from the

pharynx (_otitis media_).

(_b_) The conjunctiva is frequently the seat of localized, very rarely

the point of entrance for a generalized infection, except after severe

injury. Those diseases whose path of entrance is generally assumed to

be the respiratory tract (see “Lungs” below) might also be admitted

through the eye. Material containing such organisms might get on the

conjunctiva and be washed down through the lachrymal canal into the

nose. Experiment has shown that bacteria may pass in this way in a

few minutes. In case masks are worn to avoid infection from patients

suffering with these diseases, the eyes should therefore be protected

as well as the nose and mouth.

(_c_) The nasal cavity on account of its anatomical structure retains

pathogenic organisms which give rise to local infections more

frequently than other mucosæ of its character. These may extend from

here to middle ear, neighboring sinuses, or along the lymph spaces of

the olfactory nerve into the cranial cavity (meningitis). Acute coryza

(“colds” in man) is characteristic. Glanders, occasionally, is primary

in the nose, as is probably roup in chickens, leprosy in man. The

meningococcus and the virus of poliomyelitis pass from the nose into

the cranial cavity without local lesions in the former.

(_d_) The mouth cavity is ordinarily protected by its epithelium

and secretions, though the injured mucosa is a common source of

_actinomycosis_ infection, as well as thrush. In foot-and-mouth disease

no visible lesions seem necessary to permit the localization of the

unknown infective agent.

(_e_) The tonsils afford a ready point of entrance for ever-present

_micrococci_ and _streptococci_ whenever occasion offers (follicular

tonsillitis, “quinsy”), and articular rheumatism is not an uncommon

sequel. The diphtheria bacillus characteristically seeks these

structures for its development. Tubercle and anthrax organisms

occasionally enter here.

(_f_) The pharynx is the seat of localized infection as in

_micrococcal_, _streptococcal_ and diphtherial “sore throat” in human

beings, but both it and the esophagus are rarely infected in animals

except as the result of injury.

(_g_) The external genitalia are the usual points of entrance for

the venereal organisms in man (gonococcus, _Treponema pallidum_, and

Ducrey’s bacillus). The bacillus of contagious abortion and probably

the trypanosome of dourine are commonly introduced through these

channels in animals.

_C._ =Lungs.=--The varied types of pneumonia due to many different

organisms (tubercle, glanders, influenza, plague bacilli, pneumococcus,

streptococcus, micrococcus and many others) show how frequently these

organs are the seat of a localized infection, which may or may not be

general. Whether the lungs are the actual point of entrance in these

cases is a question which is much discussed at the present time,

particularly with reference to tuberculosis. The mucous secretion

of the respiratory tract tends to catch incoming bacteria and other

small particles and the ciliary movement along bronchial tubes and

trachea tends to carry such material out. “Foreign body pneumonia”

shows clinically, and many observers have shown experimentally that

microörganisms may reach the alveoli even though the exchange of

air between them and the bronchioles and larger bronchi takes place

ordinarily only by diffusion. The presence of carbon particles in the

walls of the alveoli in older animals and human beings and in those

that breathe dusty air for long periods indicates strongly, though it

does not prove absolutely, that these came in with inspired air. On the

other hand, experiment has shown that tubercle bacilli introduced into

the intestine may appear in the lungs and cause disease there and not

in the intestine. It is probably safe to assume that in those diseases

which are transmitted most readily through close association though

not necessarily actual contact, the commonest path is through the

respiratory tract, which may or may not show lesions (smallpox, scarlet

fever, measles, chicken-pox, whooping-cough, pneumonic plague in man,

lobar and bronchopneumonias and influenza in man and animals, some

cases of glanders and tuberculosis). On the other hand, the fact that

the _Bacterium typhosum_ and _Bacterium coli_ may cause pneumonia when

they evidently have reached the lung from the intestinal tract, and the

experimental evidence of lung tuberculosis above mentioned show that

this route cannot be excluded in inflammations of the lung.

_D._ =Alimentary Tract.=--The alimentary tract affords the ordinary

path of entrance for the causal microbes of many of the diseases of

animals and man, since they are carried into the body most commonly and

most abundantly in the food and drink.

(_a_) The stomach is rarely the seat of local infection, even in

ruminants, except as the result of trauma. The character of the

epithelium in the rumen, reticulum and omasum in ruminants, the

hydrochloric acid in the abomasum and in the stomachs of animals

generally are usually sufficient protection. Occasionally anthrax

“pustules” develop in the gastric mucosa. (The author saw nine such

pustules in a case of anthrax in a man.)

(_b_) The intestines are frequently the seat of localized infections,

as various “choleras” and “dysenteries” in men and many animals,

anthrax, tuberculosis, Johne’s disease. Here doubtless enter the

organisms causing “hemorrhagic septicemias” in many classes of animals,

and numerous others. These various organisms must have passed through

the stomach and the question at once arises, why did the HCl not

destroy them? It must be remembered that the acid is present only

during stomach digestion, and that liquids taken on an “empty stomach”

pass through rapidly and any organisms present are not subjected to

the action of the acid. Also spores generally resist the acid. Other

organisms may pass through the stomach within masses of undigested

food. The fact that digestion is going on in the stomach of ruminants

practically all the time may explain the relative freedom of _adult_

animals of this class from “choleras” and “dysenteries.”

MECHANISM OF ENTRANCE OF ORGANISMS.

In the preceding chapters statements have been made that “bacteria

enter” at various places or they “pass through” different mucous

membranes, skin, etc. Strictly speaking such statements are

incorrect--bacteria do not “enter” or “pass through” of themselves.

It is true that some of the intestinal organisms are motile, but most

of the bacteria which are pathogenic are non-motile. Even the motile

ones can not make their way against fluids secreted or excreted on free

surfaces. Bacteria cannot pass by diffusion through membranes since

they are finite particles and not in solution.

In the case of penetrating wounds bacteria may be carried mechanically

into the tissues, but this is exceptional in most infections. Also

after gaining lodgment they may gradually grow through by destroying

tissue as they grow, but this is a minor factor. Evidently, there

must be some mechanism by which they _are carried_ through. The known

mechanisms for this in the body are ameboid cells, especially the

phagocytes. It is most probable that these are the chief agents in

getting bacteria into the tissues through various free surfaces. The

phagocytes engulf bacteria, carry them into the tissues and either

destroy them, are destroyed by them, or may disgorge or excrete them

free in the tissues or in the blood.

DISSEMINATION OF ORGANISMS.

Dissemination of organisms within the tissues occurs either through

the lymph channels or the bloodvessels or both. If through the lymph

vessels only it is usually much more restricted in extent, or much more

slowly disseminated, while blood dissemination is characterized by the

number of organs involved simultaneously.

PATHS OF ELIMINATION OF PATHOGENIC MICRÖORGANISMS.

I. Directly from the point, of injury. This is true in infected

wounds open to the surface, skin glanders (farcy), black-leg,

surface anthrax, exanthemata in man and animals (scarlet fever (?),

measles (?), smallpox; hog erysipelas, foot-and-mouth disease):

also in case of disease of mucous membranes continuous with the

skin--from nasal discharges (glanders), saliva (foot-and-mouth

disease), material coughed or sneezed out (tuberculosis, influenza,

pneumonias), urethral and vaginal discharges (gonorrhea and syphilis

in man, contagious abortion and dourine in animals), intestinal

discharges (typhoid fever, “choleras,” “dysenteries,” anthrax,

tuberculosis, Johne’s disease). Material from nose, mouth and lungs

may be swallowed and the organisms passed out through the intestines.

II. Indirectly through the secretions and the excretions where the

internal organs are involved. The _saliva_ of rabid animals contains

the ultramicroscopic virus of rabies (the sympathetic ganglia

within the salivary glands, and pancreas also, are affected in this

disease as well as the cells of the central nervous system). The

_gall-bladder_ in man is known to harbor colon and typhoid bacilli,

as that of hog-cholera hogs does the virus of this disease. It may

harbor analogous organisms in other animals, though such knowledge

is scanty. The _kidneys_ have been shown experimentally to excrete

certain organisms introduced into the circulation within a few minutes

(micrococci, colon and typhoid bacilli, anthrax). Typhoid bacilli occur

in the urine of typhoid-fever patients in about 25 per cent. of all

cases and the urine of hogs with hog cholera is highly virulent. Most

observers are of the opinion, however, that under natural conditions

the kidneys do not excrete bacteria unless they themselves are infected.

The _milk_ both of tuberculous cattle and tuberculous women has been

shown to contain tubercle bacilli _even when the mammary glands are not

involved_. Doubtless such bacteria are carried through the walls of the

secreting tubules or of the smaller ducts by phagocytes and are then

set free in the milk.

SPECIFICITY OF LOCATION OF INFECTIVE ORGANISMS.

It is readily apparent that certain disease organisms tend to locate

themselves in definite regions and the question arises, Is this due

to any specific relationship between organism and tissue or not?

Diphtheria in man usually attacks the tonsils first, gonorrhea and

syphilis the external genitals, tuberculosis the lung, “choleras” the

small intestine, “dysenteries” the large intestine, influenza the

lungs. In these cases the explanation is probably that the points

attacked are the places where the organism is most commonly carried,

with no specific relationship, since all of these organisms (Asiatic

cholera excepted) also produce lesions in other parts of the body _when

they reach them_. On the other hand, the virus of hydrophobia attacks

nerve cells, leprosy frequently singles out nerves, glanders bacilli

introduced into the abdominal cavity of a young male guinea-pig cause

an inflammation of the testicle, malarial parasites and piroplasms

attack the red blood corpuscles, etc. In fact, most _pathogenic

protozoa_ are specific in their localization either in certain tissue

cells or in the blood or lymph. In these cases there is apparently a

real chemical relationship, as there is also between the _toxins_ of

bacteria and certain tissue cells (tetanus toxin and nerve cells).

Whether “chemotherapy” will ever profit from a knowledge of such

chemical relationships remains to be developed. It appears that a

search for these specific chemical substances with the object of

combining poisons with them so that the organisms might in this way be

destroyed, would be a profitable line of research.

CHAPTER XXV.

IMMUNITY.

Immunity, as has already been stated, implies such a condition of the

body that pathogenic organisms after they have been introduced are

incapable of manifesting themselves, and are unable to cause disease.

The word has come to have a more specific meaning than resistance in

many instances, in other cases the terms are used synonymously. It is

the opposite of susceptibility. The term must be understood always in a

relative sense, since no animal is immune to all pathogenic organisms,

and conceivably not entirely so to anyone, because there is no question

that a sufficient number of bacteria of any kind might be injected

into the circulation to kill an animal, even though it did it purely

mechanically.

Immunity may be considered with reference to a single individual or to

entire divisions of the organic world, with all grades between. Thus

plants are immune to the diseases affecting animals; invertebrates to

vertebrate diseases; cold-blooded animals to those of warm blood; man

is immune to most of the diseases affecting other mammals; the rat to

anthrax, which affects other rodents and most mammals; the well-known

race of Algerian sheep is likewise immune to anthrax while other sheep

are susceptible; the negro appears more resistant to yellow fever than

the white; some few individuals in a herd of hogs always escape an

epizoötic of hog cholera, etc.

Immunity within a given species is modified by a number of

factors--age, state of nutrition, extremes of heat or cold, fatigue,

excesses of any kind, in fact, anything which tends to lower the

“normal healthy tone” of an animal also tends to lower its resistance.

Children appear more susceptible to scarlet fever, measles,

whooping-cough, etc., than adults; young cattle more frequently have

black-leg than older ones (these apparently greater susceptibilities

may be due in part to the fact that most of the older individuals

have had the diseases when young and are immune for this reason).

Animals weakened by hunger or thirst succumb to infection more readily.

Frogs and chickens are immune to tetanus, but if the former be put

in water and warmed up to and kept, at about 37°, and the latter be

chilled for several hours in ice-water, then each may be infected.

Pneumonia frequently follows exposure to cold. The immune rat may

be given anthrax if first he is made to run in a “squirrel cage”

until exhausted. Alcoholics are far less resistant to infection than

temperate individuals. “Worry,” mental anguish, tend to predispose to

infection.

The following outlines summarize the different, classifications of

immunity so far as mammals are concerned for the purposes of discussion.

Immunity.

{ {1. Inherited through

{ { the germ cell or cells.

{ { {(_a_) By having the

{A. Congenital {2. Acquired { disease _in utero_.

I. Natural { { _in utero_. {(_b_) By absorption

{ { { of immune

{ { substances

{B. Acquired by { from the mother.

{ having the disease.

II. Artificial--acquired through human agency by:

1. Introduction of the organism or its products.

2. Introduction of the blood serum of an immune animal.

Immunity.

I. Active--due to the introduction of the organism or due to the

introduction of the products of the organism.

A. Naturally by having the disease.

B. Artificially.

1. By introducing the organism:

{1. Passage through another animal.

{2. Drying.

(_a_) Alive and virulent. {3. Growing at a higher temperature.

(_b_) Alive and virulence {4. Heating the cultures.

reduced by {5. Treating with chemicals.

(_c_) Dead. {6. Sensitizing.

{7. Cultivation on artificial media.

2. By introducing the products of the organism.

II. Passive--due to the introduction of the blood serum of an actively

immunized animal.

Immunity present in an animal and not due to human interference is to

be regarded as _natural_ immunity, while if brought about by man’s

effort it is considered _artificial_. Those cases of natural immunity

mentioned above which are common to divisions, classes, orders,

families, species or races of organisms and to those few individuals

where no special cause is discoverable, must be regarded as instances

of true _inheritance_ through the germ cell as other characteristics

are. All other kinds of immunity are _acquired_. Occasionally young are

born with every evidence that they have had a disease _in utero_ and

are thereafter as immune as though the attack had occurred after birth

(“small-pox babies,” “hog-cholera pigs”). Experiment has shown that

immune substances may pass from the blood of the mother to the fetus

_in utero_ and the young be immune for a time after birth (tetanus).

This is of no practical value as yet. It is a familiar fact that with

most infectious diseases recovery from one attack confers a more or

less lasting immunity, though there are marked exceptions.

=Active Immunity.=--By active immunity is meant that which is due

to the actual introduction of the organism, or in some cases of its

products. The term active is used because the body cells of the animal

immunized perform the real work of bringing about the immunity as

will be discussed later. In _passive_ immunity the blood serum of an

actively immunized animal is introduced into a second animal, which

thereupon becomes immune, though its cells are not concerned in the

process. The animal is _passive_, just as a test-tube, in which a

reaction takes place, plays no other part than that of a passive

container for the reagents.

In _active_ immunity the organism may be introduced in what is to

be considered a natural manner, as when an animal becomes infected,

has a disease, without human interference. Or the organism may be

purposely introduced to bring about the immunity. For certain purposes

the introduction of the products of the organism (toxins) is used to

bring about active immunity (preparation of diphtheria and tetanus

antitoxin from the horse). The method of producing active immunity by

the artificial introduction of the organism is called _vaccination_,

and a _vaccine_ must therefore contain the organism. _Vaccines_ for

_bacterial_ diseases are frequently called _bacterins_. The use of

the blood serum of an immunized animal to confer passive immunity on

a second animal is properly called _serum therapy_, and the serum so

used is spoken of as an _antiserum_, though the latter word is also

used to denote any serum containing any kind of an antibody (Chapters

XXVII-XXXI). In a few instances both the organism and an antiserum are

used to cause both active and passive immunity (_serum-simultaneous

method_ in immunizing against hog cholera).

In producing active immunity the organism may be introduced (_a_)

_alive and virulent_, but in very small doses, or in combination with

an immune serum, as just mentioned for hog cholera. The introduction

of the live virulent organism alone is done only experimentally as

yet, as it is obviously too dangerous to do in practice, except under

the strictest control (introduction of a _single tubercle_ bacillus,

followed by gradually increasing numbers--Barber and Webb). More

commonly the organisms are introduced (_b_) alive but with their

_virulence reduced_ (“attenuated”) in one of several ways: (1) By

passing the organism through another animal as is the case with

_smallpox vaccine_ derived from a calf or heifer. This method was

first introduced by Jenner in 1795 and was the first practical means

of preventing disease by _vaccination_. This word was used because

material was derived from a cow--Latin _vacca_. (2) By drying the

organism, as is done in the preparation of the vaccine for the _Pasteur

treatment of rabies_, where the spinal cords of rabbits are dried for

varying lengths of time--one to four days, Russian method, one to three

days, German method, longer in this country. (It is probable that the

passage of the “fixed virus” through the rabbit is as important in this

procedure as the drying, since it is doubtful if the “fixed virus” is

pathogenic for man.) It would be more correct to speak of this as a

_preventive vaccination against rabies_, since the latter is one of the

few diseases which is not amenable to _treatment_. The patient always

dies if the disease develops. (3) The organism may be attenuated by

growing at a temperature above the normal. This is the method used in

preparing _anthrax vaccine_ as done by Pasteur originally. (4) Instead

of growing at a higher temperature the culture may be heated in such

a way that it is not killed but merely weakened. _Black-leg_ vaccines

are made by this method. (5) Chemicals are sometimes added to attenuate

the organisms, as was formerly done in the preparation of black-leg

vaccine by Kruse’s method in Germany. The use of toxin-antitoxin

mixtures in immunizing against diphtheria and in the preparation

of diphtheria antitoxin from horses is an application of the same

principle, though here it is the _product_ of the organism and not the

organism whose action is weakened. (6) Within the past few years the

workers in the Pasteur Institute in Paris have been experimenting with

vaccines prepared by treating living virulent bacteria with antisera

(“sensitizing them”) so that they are no longer capable of causing

the disease when introduced, but do cause the production of an active

immunity. The method has been used with typhoid fever bacilli in man

and seems to be successful. It remains to be tried out further before

its worth is demonstrated (the procedure is more complicated and the

chance for infection apparently much greater than by the use of killed

cultures). The term _sero-bacterins_ is used by manufacturers in this

country to designate such bacterial vaccines. (7) Growing on artificial

culture media reduces the virulence of most organisms after a longer

or shorter time. This method has been tried with many organisms in the

laboratory, but is not now used in practice. The difficulties are that

the attenuation is very uncertain and that the organisms tend to regain

their virulence when introduced into the body.

In producing active immunity against many bacterial diseases the

organisms are introduced (_c_) dead. They are killed by heat or by

chemicals, or by using both methods (Chapter XXX).

When the products of an organism are introduced the resulting immunity

is against the products only and not against the organism. If the

organism itself is introduced there results an immunity against it

and in some cases also against the products, though the latter does

not necessarily follow. Hence the immunity may be _antibacterial_ or

_antitoxic_ or both.

Investigation as to the causes of immunity and the various methods by

which it is produced has not resulted in the discovery of specific

methods of treatment for as many diseases as was hoped for at one

time. Just at present progress in serum therapy appears to be at a

standstill, though vaccines are giving good results in many instances

not believed possible a few years ago. As a consequence workers in all

parts of the world are giving more and more attention to the search for

_specific chemical substances_, which will destroy invading parasites

and not injure the host (_chemotherapy_). Nevertheless, in the study

of immunity very much of value in the treatment and prevention of

disease has been learned. Also much knowledge which is of the greatest

use in other lines has been accumulated. Methods of _diagnosis_ of

great exactness have resulted, applicable in numerous diseases. Ways

of _detecting adulteration_ in foods, particularly foods from animal

sources, and of _differentiating proteins_ of varied origin, as well

as means of establishing _biological relationships_ and differences

among groups of animals through “immunity reactions” of blood serums

have followed from knowledge gained by application of the facts or the

methods of immunity research. Hence the study of “immunity problems”

has come to include much more than merely the study of those factors

which prevent the development of disease in an animal or result in

its spontaneous recovery. A proper understanding of the principles of

immunity necessitates a study of these various features and they will

be considered in the discussion to follow.

CHAPTER XXVI.

THEORIES OF IMMUNITY.

Pasteur and the bacteriologists of his time discovered that bacteria

cease to grow in artificial culture media after a time, because of

the exhaustion of the food material in some cases and because of the

injurious action of their own products in other instances. These facts

were brought forward to explain immunity shortly after bacteria were

shown to be the cause of certain diseases. Theories based on these

observations were called (1) “_Exhaustion Theory_” of _Pasteur_, and

(2) “_Noxious Retention Theory_” of _Chauveau_ respectively. The fact,

soon discovered, that virulent pathogenic bacteria are not uncommonly

present in perfectly healthy animals, and the later discovery that

immunity may be conferred by the injection of dead bacteria have led

to the abandonment of both these older ideas. The (3) “_Unfavorable

Environment_” theory of _Baumgartner_, _i.e._, bacteria do not grow

in the body and produce disease because their surroundings are not

suitable, in a sense covers the whole ground, though it is not true as

to the first part, as was pointed out above, and is of no value as a

working basis, since it offers no explanation as to _what the factors

are_ that constitute the “_unfavorable environment_.” Metchnikoff

brought forward a rational explanation of immunity with his (4)

“_Cellular or Phagocytosis Theory_.” As first propounded it based

immunity on the observed fact that certain white blood corpuscles,

_phagocytes_, engulf and destroy bacteria. Metchnikoff has since

elaborated the original theory to explain facts of later discovery.

Ehrlich soon after published his (5) “_Chemical or Side-chain Theory_”

which seeks to explain immunity on the basis of _chemical substances_

in the body which may in part destroy pathogenic organisms or in

part neutralize their products; or in some instances there may be

an absence of certain chemical substances in the body cells so that

bacteria or their products _cannot unite_ with the cells and hence can

do no damage.

[Illustration: PLATE VI

PAUL EHRLICH]

At the present time it is generally accepted, in this country at

least, that Ehrlich’s theory explains immunity in many diseases as

well as many of the phenomena related to immunity, and in other

diseases the phagocytes, frequently assisted by chemical substances,

are the chief factors. Specific instances are discussed in _Pathogenic

Bacteriologies_ which should be consulted. It is essential that the

student should be familiar with the basic ideas of the chemical

theory, not only from the standpoint of immunity, but also in order to

understand the principles of a number of valuable methods of diagnosis.

The chemical theory rests on three fundamental physiological

principles: (1) the response of cells to stimuli, in this connection

_specific chemical stimuli_, (2) the presence within cells of _specific

chemical groups_ which combine with chemical stimuli and thus enable

them to act on the cell, which groups Ehrlich has named _receptors_,

and (3) the “_over-production_” activity of cells as announced by

Weigert.

1. That cells respond to stimuli is fundamental in physiology. These

stimuli may be of many kinds as mechanical, electrical, light, thermal,

chemical, etc. The body possesses groups of cells specially developed

to _receive_ some of these stimuli--touch cells for mechanical stimuli,

retinal cells for light, temperature nerve endings for thermal,

olfactory and gustatory cells for certain chemical stimuli. _Response_

to chemical stimuli is well illustrated along the digestive tract. That

the chemical stimuli in digestion may be more or less specific is shown

by the observed differences in the enzymes of the pancreatic juice

dependent on the relative amounts of carbohydrates, fats, or proteins

in the food, the specific enzyme in each case being increased in the

juice with the increase of its corresponding foodstuff. The cells of

the body, or certain of them at least, seem to respond in a specific

way when substances are brought into direct contact with them, that is,

without having been subjected to digestion in the alimentary tract,

but injected directly into the blood or lymph stream. Cells may be

affected by stimuli in one of three ways: if the stimulus is too weak,

there is no effect (in reality there is no “stimulus” acting); if the

stimulus is too strong, the cell is injured, or may be destroyed; if

the stimulus is of proper amount then it excites the cell to increased

activity, and in the case of _specific chemical stimuli_ the increased

activity, as mentioned for the pancreas, shows itself in an _increased

production of whatever is called forth by the chemical stimulus_. In

the case of many organic chemicals, the substances produced by the

cells under their direct stimulation are markedly specific for the

particular substance introduced.

2. Since chemical action always implies at least two bodies to react,

Ehrlich assumes that in every cell which is affected by a chemical

stimulus there must therefore be a chemical group to unite with this

stimulus. He further states that there must be as many different

kinds of these groups as there are different kinds of chemicals which

stimulate the cell. Since these groups are present in the body cells to

_take up_ different kinds of chemical substances, Ehrlich calls them

_receptors_. Since these groups must be small as compared with the cell

as a whole, and must be more or less on the surface and unite readily

with chemical substances he further speaks of them as “side-chains”

after the analogy of compounds of the aromatic series especially. The

term _receptors_ is now generally used. As was stated above, the effect

of _specific chemical stimuli_ is to cause the production of _more of

the particular substance_ for which it is specific and in the class

of bodies under discussion, the _particular product is these cell

receptors_ with which the chemical may unite.

3. Weigert first called attention to the practically constant

phenomenon that cells ordinarily respond by doing more of a particular

response than is actually called for by the stimulus, that there is

always an “overproduction” of activity. In the case of chemical stimuli

this means an _increased production of the specific substance_ over and

above the amount actually needed.

The student will better understand this theory if he recalls his

fundamental physiology. Living substance is characterized, among other

things, by irritability which is instability. It is in a constant,

state of unstable equilibrium. Whenever the equilibrium becomes

permanently stable the substance is dead. It is also continually

attempting to restore disturbances in its equilibrium. Whenever a

chemical substance unites with a chemical substance in the cell, a

receptor, the latter is, so far as the cell is concerned, _thrown out

of function_ for that cell. The chemical equilibrium of the latter

is upset. It attempts to restore this and does so by making a _new_

receptor to take the place of the one thrown out of function. If this

process is continued, _i.e._, if the new receptor is similarly “used

up” and others similarly formed are also, then the cell will prepare

a supply of these and even an excess, according to Weigert’s theory.

Whenever a cell accumulates an excess of products the normal result

is that it excretes them from its own substance into the surrounding

lymph, whence they reach the blood stream to be either carried to

the true excretory organs, utilized by other cells or remain for a

longer or shorter time in the blood. Hence the excess of receptors

is _excreted from the cell that forms them_ and they become _free_

in the blood. These free receptors are termed _antibodies_. _They

are receptors_ but instead of being retained in the cell are _free

in solution in the blood_. One function of the free receptor, the

antibody, is _always to unite with the chemical substance which caused

it to be formed_. _It may have additional functions._ The chemical

substance which caused the excess formation of receptors, antibodies,

is termed an _antigen_ for that particular kind of antibody.

To recapitulate, Ehrlich’s theory postulates _specific chemical

stimuli_, which react with _specific chemical substances in the body

cells, named receptors_, and that these _receptors_, according to

Weigert, are _produced in excess_ and hence are excreted from the

cell and become _free receptors_ in the blood and lymph. These _free

receptors_ are the various kinds of _antibodies_, the kind depending

on the nature of the stimulus, antigen, the substance introduced. Any

substance which when introduced into the body causes the formation of

an antibody of any kind whatsoever is called an _antigen_,[23] _i.e._,

anti (body) former.

The foregoing discussion explains Ehrlich’s theory of immunity.

According to this theory the _manner of formation of all antibodies_ is

the same. The _kind of antibody_ and the _manner of its action_ will

differ with the _different kinds of antigens_ used.

The succeeding chapters discuss some of the kinds of antibodies, the

theory of their action and some practical applications. It must be

borne in mind throughout the study of these, as has been stated, that

_every antibody has the property of uniting with its antigen whether it

has any property in addition or not_.

Just what antibodies are chemically has not been determined because

no one has as yet succeeded in isolating them chemically pure. To the

author they appear to be enzymes.

Antigens were considered by Ehrlich to be proteins or to be related to

proteins. Most workers since Ehrlich have held similar views. Dr. Carl

Warden of the University of Michigan has been doing much work in recent

years in which he is attempting to show that the antigens are not

proteins but are fats or fatty acids. Mr. E. E. H. Boyer, in his work

(not yet published) in the author’s laboratory for the degree of Ph.D.,

received in June, 1920, succeeded in producing various antibodies from

_Bacterium coli_ antigens. In these antigens he could detect only fatty

acids or salts of fatty acids. If the work of these men is confirmed,

it will open up a most interesting and extremely important field in

immunity and in preventive medicine. It is not apparent that the nature

of the antigen would affect Ehrlich’s theory of the formation of

antibodies.

The author has no doubt that eventually the formation of antibodies and

the reactions between them and their antigens will be explained on the

basis of physical-chemical laws, but this probably awaits the discovery

of their nature.

CHAPTER XXVII.

RECEPTORS OF THE FIRST ORDER.

The Fundamentals of Bacteriology · 第 11 / 13 章