CHAPTER V.

THE STRUCTURE OF THE HUMAN FEET, ETC.

“There is nothing more beautiful than the structure of the human foot,”

says Sir Charles Bell; “nor perhaps any demonstration which would lead a

well-educated person to desire to know more of anatomy than that of the

foot. The foot has in its structure all the fine appliances you see in a

building. In the first place, there is an arch, in whatever way you

regard the foot; looking down upon it, we perceive several bones coming

round the astralagos, and forming an entire circle of surfaces in the

contact. If we look at the profile of the foot, an arch is still

manifest, of which the posterior part is formed by the heel, and the

anterior by the ball of the great toe; and in the front, we find in that

direction a transverse arch: so that, instead of standing, as might be

imagined, on a solid bone, we stand upon an arch composed of a series of

bones, which are united by the most curious provision for the elasticity

of the foot; hence, if we jump from height directly upon the heel, a

severe shock is felt; not so, if we alight upon the ball of the great

toe, for there an elasticity is formed in the whole foot, and the weight

of the body is thrown upon this arch, and the shock avoided.”

Another writer, on the “diseases of the feet,” thus alludes to the

beauty and perfection of the human foot in its natural state:--

“The matchless forms of sculptured beauty which the destroying hand of

time has left us in the works of the mighty masters of the classic time,

exhibit to us the finest specimens of what the foot would be, if allowed

its free and uninterrupted action.

“We are immediately struck with the admirable manner in which it is

organized, both for the support of the frame and for motion; its

flexibility, its power of action, its form, seem all to have been the

result of the examination of the most perfect human models. We see that

there have been no artificial coverings, no compression, no restraints;

that the gait must have been free, firm, and elastic; that the natural

and healthful action of every muscle, tendon, joint, and bone, was fully

studied and expressed. There is no stiffness, no contraction of the heel

or the sole of the foot; to the toes are given their proper functions;

we see that only the sandal has been worn, merely to cover and protect

the integument under the broad and expanded foot, there have been no

ligatures, no unyielding bandages, no cramping compresses--all is alike

free, healthful, natural.

“We well can comprehend, on examining them, how the Macedonian phalanx

or the Roman legion, performed its long day’s march. We can see how ten

thousand Greeks pursued their daily wearying course through the

destroying climate of Asia, marching firmly, manfully, alike across the

arid sand, the mountain pass, or the flinty plain.

“We are almost led to the wish to see the European soldier similarly

prepared for his toilsome march, unencumbered by the unyielding shoe,

which sometimes becomes in the day a source of greater annoyance than of

comfort to him. He would be enabled to undertake fatigue and privations

for which he is now totally unprepared. He would find an elastic tread,

a firm command over his muscular system, follow upon such a plan. He

would be capable of making a charge upon the enemy with greater

steadiness, and enabled to bear the shock which he is now less capable

of resisting. In this respect we should do well to imitate the native

soldier of India, who, under the English banner, has followed a Clive, a

Hastings, or a Keane, when the British soldier has almost sunk from the

insuperable difficulties which attend wearing all parts of the dress he

has been accustomed to do in England, forgetful of the climate in which

he is placed.”

For upward of twenty years as a bootmaker, I have made the feet my

study, and during that period many thousand pairs of feet have received

my attention. I have observed with minute care the _cast_ from the

antique as well as “the modern instances,” and I am obliged to admit,

that much of the pain I have witnessed, much of the distortion of the

toes, the corns on the top of the feet, the bunion on the side, the

callosities beneath, and the growing-in of the nails between, are

attributable to the shoemaker. The feet, with proper treatment, might be

as free from disease and pain as the hands; their structure and

adaptation to the wants and comfort of man, as we have seen, is most

perfect. Thirty-six bones and thirty-six joints have been given by the

Creator to form one of these members, and yet man cramps, cabins, and

confines, his beautiful arrangements of one hundred and forty-four bones

and joints, together with muscles, elastic cartilage, lubricating oily

fluid, veins, and arteries, into a pair of shoes or boots, which,

instead of protecting from injury, produces the most painful as well as

permanent results. Many volumes have been written on the cause of

corns, and it has been my lot to wade through many of them, without

gaining much for my pains. I have therefore arrived at the conclusion,

notwithstanding all that has been said to the contrary, that corns are

in all cases the result of pressure.

I am confirmed in this opinion by one of the most respectable

chiropodists of the present day (Mr. Durlacher), a gentleman who has had

a considerable experience in the treatment of corns and bunions. He

says:--

“Pressure and friction are unquestionably the predisposing causes of

corns, although, in some instances, they are erroneously supposed to be

hereditary. Improperly-made shoes invariably produce pressure upon the

integuments of the toes and prominent parts of the feet, to which is

opposed a corresponding resistance from the bone immediately beneath, in

consequence of which the vessels of the dermis are compressed between

them, become injured, congested, and, after a time, hypertrophied.

“When corns are produced by friction and slight pressure, they are the

result of the shoes being too large and the leather hard, so that, by

the extension of the foot, the little toe, or any prominent part, is

constantly being rubbed and compressed by its own action.

“This may continue on and off for months, or even years, before any

inconvenience is experienced, but, progressively, the cuticle increases,

and is either detached from the dermis by serum being poured out between

them, similar to a common blister, and a new covering produced, or the

epidermis thickens into layers adhering to each other.”

Chiropodists have been in the habit of classifying corns into--

1. Hard corns.

2. Soft corns.

3. Bleeding corns.

And these classes have been subdivided into many varieties, but it is

enough, in a treatise on the feet and their covering, to allude to the

cause of torment generally, as a hard substance and a soft one, pressing

into the foot, as the Roman name emphatically describes it, “clavus

dura”--a small tack.

The approach of a corn, as all who ever felt it know, commences with a

slight inflammatory smart on the prominent part of the little toe; then

comes on the excessive burning, the throbbing, the stabbing: “a little

longer, yet a little longer;” and then the point of the tack begins to

enter, the outer skin is penetrated, the next membrane becomes inflamed,

and, from the delicate “network” of the rete mucosum, an increased

quantity of secretion is poured out: gradually a substance is formed,

hard, horny, and with a sharp point, that descends deeper and deeper

into the foot, until not unfrequently it reaches and enters the

blood-vessels and very joints themselves.

All attempts at cure must be directed to the point of the corn. It has

been usual to salve and plaster and cut the head of this tack, generally

with little or no success--call it a thorn in the foot, “spina pedum,” a

name given to it by some practitioners; and how absurd this palliative

treatment appears--every one knows that the thorn must immediately be

extracted, and if we delay, great pain is the consequence, and soon

nature expels it herself.

Some balsams and tinctures have been much spoken of by the older writers

on the different excrescences, but modern practice has very judiciously

excluded them, from their insufficiency to produce any good effect. The

radical cure is more dependent upon surgical than medical means.

“Although I have devoted,” says Mr. Durlacher, “nearly thirty years

practical experience to the investigation, and have tried various

chymical and other remedial agents, yet I have never been able to

discover any certain cure for corns. Nevertheless, men are found bold

enough in their ignorance and presumption, to assert, by public

advertisement, that they possess an infallible nostrum, capable of

thoroughly eradicating corns; and others who pretend to extract them,

seek to aid their trickery and charlatanry by exhibiting small spiculæ

as the roots of the corns they have extracted, although it is a positive

fact from the structure of the skin, that such an assertion must be

false, and the whole proceeding the veriest imposition imaginable.”

The reader must, by this time have arrived at the conclusion, that the

whole mischief is to be laid upon the covering of the feet, and not on

the feet themselves. In some instances it may be admitted that the feet

are peculiarly exposed to injury from the delicacy of the skin; some

persons are constitutionally predisposed to corns, the slightest

friction or pressure being sufficient to cause irritation, or, as in

some cases, to develop a corn that has sometime been lying dormant. The

illustrations given in former chapters of fashions, will sufficiently

prove the cause of distortion of the feet; and the result of this

infliction of pain for the sake of fashion, has been a plentiful harvest

of corns.

Every one who has corns knows and feels that pressure is the cause; “no

one knows better where the shoe pinches, than he who wears it.” Yet few

persons know why it hurts, or are aware how the remedy should be

applied.

Sometimes a shoe is too large, often too small, very often too short,

but generally the wrong shape altogether. The fault is not so much in

the shoes themselves, as in the lasts from which they are made; there

the cause is to be found, and there it has been my study for many years

to apply the remedy.

The best materials may have been used for sole and upper leather; the

most exquisite closing and stabbing been put in till the work “looked

like print;” the workmanship may have been “firstrate,” but deficient in

the primary and most essential part--the suitable form of the last on

which the article was to be moulded. The boot or shoe would not be a

suitable or comfortable covering for the foot, and the unfortunate

wearer again finds that he has put his feet into the “shoemaker’s

stocks.”

Every one who wishes to be comfortably fitted, should have a pair of

lasts made expressly for his own use; experience has taught me, and

doubtless many other masters who have had much to do with bespoke work

for tender or peculiar feet, that no plan is equal to this to secure a

good fit and save inconvenience and disappointment for the future.

The length and the width are now every-day affairs, but the judgment of

fitting is another thing, and here is the true skill.

A last fitted up to the length and width may do or it may not; it may do

by chance, or fail of necessity; but if fitting be anything, it is a

skilful adaptation of the last to the true form and requirements of the

foot generally.

[Illustration]

The outlines, 1, 2, 3, will show the direction and bearing of three

different feet, neither of which would be comfortably fitted, if the

length and width were the only points attended to. For No. 1 we require

a straight-formed last, with an equal proportion of wood on each side

the centre line. No. 2 requires considerable fulness of the inside

joint, to allow for a bunion; the great toe requires a bed for the ball

to rest in; the waist must be very hollow, else the quarter will bag;

while No. 3 requires a wide flat tread and great thickness of wood, for

the toes which are covered with corns.

Many persons have an idea that right and left shoes are a comparatively

modern invention, but the illusions and illustrations to the contrary,

in pages 39-44 disprove this; straight lasts are decidedly a modern

invention, and notwithstanding what many persons say to the contrary,

are decidedly inferior to a well-formed right and left pair.

The great evil has been that all right and left lasts, of late have been

_crooked_. It was thought in abandoning the straight last with its

faults, that a perfect fit could be secured in rights and lefts; and

from one extreme, as is generally the case in fashion, the opposite was

adopted, and a twisted right and left made the matter still worse.

It was thought nothing could be right and left but that which took a

decided turn, and the consequence has been that for years lasts have

been made with an ugly twist inward, where no wood was required, and on

the outside, where the toes with all their tenderness and liability to

injury have required thickness and breadth, nothing has been left.

I have pointed out this fault to last-makers a thousand times--have

stood by them at their work, and have seen the part--where, of all

things, I wished the room to be left--cruelly sliced off, or rasped

away: the consequence to the unfortunate wearer of a shoe or boot made

on that last must have been, months of torture.

Some workmen, however, have at last seen the error they have all along

been committing, and adopted the improved form, wondering how it was

never thought of before.

[Illustration]

No. 1 represents a sketch of the foot and the sole usually formed to

fit it. No. 2 is a well-formed sole, straight, suitable, and far more

elegant.

The _straight_ last has often been a better right and left for certain

feet, than the _pair_ made for them, the room having been given at the

part most wanted, which was the chief thing: and although the hollow of

the foot was not at all fitted, and the quarter gaped outside, yet it

was easy. On the other hand the right and left was deficient on the

outside, and having nothing for the second, third, and little toe, they

were cramped together, and the consequences were immediate pain, a hard

corn on the joints of the little toe and a soft one between the others.

All this may be avoided. The form of the feet should be taken in outline

on a sheet of paper, and the prominent toes noted down at the time, and

immediately after a pair of lasts made suitable in every way.

But instead of this, hundreds of shoemakers in the country have been

making all their lifetime, from some old misshapen pieces of wood, that

perhaps had done service to their fathers and grandfathers, and been

patched and altered to suit the wants of a whole parish. Even in town,

where we have last-makers at our elbow, we have been far from doing what

we ought in this matter. Instead of fitting the foot to the shoe, the

business of the tradesman certainly is to shape his last so correctly

that the shoe should fit the foot.

Petrarch is said to have nearly lamed himself from the attempts he made,

and the pinching he underwent, to display to his Laura a neat foot.

Cases of this kind are frequently met with every day, where every

sacrifice is made for this end, and pinching all over the foot may be

tolerated, and no bad consequences ensue for a time; but the pinching at

one place is the point which ought immediately to be “reformed

altogether.”

It is extremely amusing to witness, on the other side, the care some old

gentlemen take to get their shoes made easy; while the Petrarch of the

present day, orders his boots to be _smart_, and threatens his bootmaker

that if he can get into them, he “won’t have ’em,” the old gentleman of

experience and wisdom comes with two pairs of thick lamb’s wool

stockings on, which his friend who accompanies him waggishly says, are--

“His youthful hose well saved, a world too wide

For his shrunk shank;”

he looks knowingly in return and whispers, that he put on two pairs of

the thickest stockings he had, on purpose to deceive the shoemaker.

In the early English translation of “Lazarillo de Tormes,” is this

passage: “If you bid a shoemaker who has been thirty years at his trade

make a new pair of shoes with broad toes, high in the instep, and tight

about the heel, he must pare your feet before he pleases you”--a sly,

but sarcastic allusion to the imperfect fitting of the shoemaker, and an

admission of the pride of the wearer.

Ladies and gentlemen, and even children, should have their own lasts,

and be sure they are carefully and correctly made to the feet.

It would, however, be expecting too much that for a single pair of shoes

or boots, a shoemaker or bootmaker should make for his customer a pair

of lasts, free of charge; as prices are now, he would be a considerable

loser--the customer might never favor him with another order, he seeks a

cheaper shop--goes abroad or dies. The lasts on which a skilful workman

has been employed for perhaps a whole day, and which cost at least four

or five shillings, are left on his hands perfectly useless.

For my own personal comfort I would weigh my own lasts which have been

carefully made, in a scale against their weight in silver, and consider

them cheap; numbers of our nobility and gentry, in effect, do the same,

and to a much greater amount, for their personal comfort, in matters of

the teeth, eyes, chest, hair, hands, and ears. Then why not a little

sacrifice, a little more liberality, to those important members--the

feet.

No such remuneration, however, as I have hinted at would be expected;

five or six shillings generally would remunerate the maker of a pair of

lasts, and the better the fit the greater satisfaction to all.

We have now seen the fashions from the earliest period; many of the

shoes from their form and material must have been comfortable; the broad

shoe of Henry VIII., wood engraving p. 46, was one of that class, and

the slashed specimens in p. 47 sufficiently show where the shoe pinched

in 1577, and how relief was sought and obtained: even the very worst of

all the fashions might have been made comparatively comfortable had due

attention been paid to the form of the lasts.

The poet Gay gives a caution on this matter, and if the value I attach

to my lasts be their weight in silver, I am free to confess Gay’s lines

are worth their weight in _gold_.

“Let firm well-hammered soles protect thy feet,

Through freezing snows and rains and soaking sleet.

Should the big last extend the shoe too wide,

Each stone will wrench the unwary step aside;

The sudden turn may stretch the swelling vein,

The cracking joint unhinge, or ankle sprain;

And, when too short the modest shoes are worn,

You’ll judge the seasons by your shooting corn.”

The Book of the Feet: A History of Boots and Shoes · 第 5 / 9 章