OUR BOOKING-OFFICE.

(_By Mr. Punch's Staff of Learned Clerks._)

MR. CONRAD'S new hero is an unnamed chief-mate who gets his first command

to a sailing vessel, also unnamed--queer and of course quite deliberate

instance of the author's reticent, allusive method which is so entirely

plausible. Her last captain, who had some mad savage hatred of ship and

crew, died aboard her and was buried in latitude 8° 20'. The chief-mate,

who got the vessel back to port and remained under her new captain, is

convinced that the dead man haunts her vengefully; and one desperate

accident after another, racking a crew overwhelmed with fever, almost

persuades the captain to share the mate's illusion that 8° 20'--_The Shadow

Line_ (DENT)--is possessed by the dead scoundrel. I found the book less

interesting as a yarn than as an example of the astonishingly conscious and

perfect artistry of this really great master of the ways of men and words.

Mr. CONRAD never made me believe that the new captain would go so near

sharing his mate's superstitious panic (which is perhaps because I know

little of sailor-men save what he has taught me); and in the incident, so

curiously and deliberately detailed, of his finding the quinine bottles

filled with a worthless substitute, and letting them "each in turn" slip to

ground, I had again the most unusual shock of being unable to accept the

credibility of his invention. This is so rare an experience that it only

throws into relief for me the fine craft of this most brilliant of our

impressionists, who tells so much with such delicate strokes, so

conscientiously considered, so unerringly conveyed.

* * * * *

_This is the End_ (MACMILLAN) is the kind of book that only youth can

write--youth at its best. It has the qualities and defects of its

parentage; but the qualities, a fine careless rapture, sensitive vision, a

wayward and jolly fantasy, challenging provocativeness, faintly malicious

humour, are dominant. Miss STELLA BENSON will grow out of her youthful

cynicisms and intolerances, will focus her effects, without losing any of

her substantial equipment. This is by no means the end. It is the second

step of a very brilliant beginning. Already it shows improvement upon her

first clever book, _I Pose_; a surer touch, a finer restraint. What is it

all about? Does that matter? It is the manner of the telling rather than

what is told that constitutes the charm. If I tell, you that _Jay_ runs

away from a respectable home, and, after a grievous experiment as a

bolster-filler, becomes a bus-conductor, has a romantic friendship with a

middle-aged married man, and marries the faithful _Mr. Morgan_, her dead

brother's soldier friend, I have told you just nothing at all. I will

merely add that you will be foolish if you miss this book.

* * * * *

I have to begin by confessing that, despite its most attractive title, my

first glance into _French Windows_ (ARNOLD) produced in me some feeling of

prejudice. It was not that I failed to recognise both dignity and beauty of

phrase in the writing; on the contrary, I told myself that "Mr. JOHN

AYSCOUGH" had been betrayed by his own appreciation of beautiful phrases

into an indulgence in "style," a deliberate arrangement of his war-pictures

that was somehow out of harmony with the stark and horrible simplicity of

their subject. But I hasten to make confession that this was but a passing

and, I am convinced, a wrong judgment. Indeed, the abiding impression that

the book has left upon me is one of enormous sincerity. Both as a soldier

and a priest, the writer enjoyed (as his publishers quite justly say)

special opportunities for getting into touch with men of all sorts and

conditions. This, aided by his own gift of sympathy and comradeship, has

resulted in a book that is very largely a record of fleeting but genuine

friendships, made with individual soldiers, both French and English, in the

Western battle. Many of them contain portraits and character-studies (a

pedantic term for anything so sensitive and sympathetic as these tributes

to nameless heroes, but I can find no better) that linger in the memory. I

defy you, for example, to forget soon the story of that winter walk taken

by the writer and certain officer-boys of his unit to the Cistercian

Monastery, and what _Chutney_ said by the way; and what happened

afterwards. For the sake of such sincere and memorable sketches as this I

am more than ready to forgive what seemed like a touch of artifice

elsewhere.

* * * * *

Mr. GEORGE MOORE, continuing his labours as reviser and editor-in-chief of

the Moorish masterpieces, has now directed his attention to _A Modern

Lover_. Finding this (presumably) not modern enough, he has refashioned and

republished it under the admirably comprehensive title of _Lewis Seymour

and Some Women_ (HEINEMANN). Not having the original at hand, I am unable

to indulge in comparisons; but there seems good reason to suppose that

_Lewis Seymour's_ relations with the three amiable ladies who assist his

artistic and amatory career remain very much what they probably were in the

beginning. As for the tale itself, that too will hardly belie your

expectation, being full of cleverness, carried off with an infectious

gaiety, and boasting (I use the word advisedly) more than a sufficiency of

that rather assertive and school-boy impropriety which the charitable might

quote as evidence of our author's perpetual youth. It is an interesting,

though perhaps futile, speculation to reflect how Mr. THOMAS HARDY, to

whose plots the present bears some resemblance, might have handled it. Had

_Lewis Seymour_ pursued his education in womanhood under the guidance of

the wizard of Dorchester there would probably have been less of the

atmosphere of holiday humour; but, on the other hand, we should almost

certainly have been spared the quite superfluous naughtiness of the

Parisian scenes. By the way, talking of Paris, surely I am right in

supposing that the vision of a revived Versailles was an experience of two

ladies? It is unexpected to find Mr. MOORE denying anything to "the sex."

* * * * *

Of the late Mr. JACK LONDON'S alternative methods of writing, the defiantly

propagandist and the joyously adventurous, I, being an average reader, have

always preferred the latter; so that, remembering how separate and distinct

he usually kept his two styles, I expected, in taking up _The Strength of

the Strong_ (MILLS AND BOON), to be immediately either disappointed or

gratified. But, as it turns out, the half-dozen essay-stories that make up

this slender volume are by no means characteristic, for there is very

little plot in any, and even less attempt forcibly to extract a moral; and

amongst them are two not very successful North of Ireland studies that seem

to have no connection at all with the author's usual manner. The volume is

made up of social pictures, all (as Mr. LONDON liked to pretend) within his

own experience, presented impartially for you to study, and draw, if you

choose, your own conclusions. That experience ranges, comprehensively

enough, from a first-hand sketch of primeval man attempting rather

unhappily to group himself in clans and tribes, to a journalistic note of

the Yellow Peril that materialised, we learn, somewhere late in the

twentieth century and was overcome by science liberating disease--a Hunnish

method no longer novel. Of the series I like best the tale of the San

Francisco professor of dual personality, who by dint of much practical

study of labour problems came at last to cut loose from his own circle and

disappear in the army of industry. In this chapter alone is there a spark

of the volcanic fire, now unhappily no longer in eruption, that blazes in

such great stories as _The Sea Wolf_, _Adventure_ and _Burning Daylight_.

* * * * *

Though there may be no very particular reason why you should be invited to

read _The Love Story of Guillaume-Marc_ (HUTCHINSON) it is, I vouch, a

vivid enough tale of its _genre_. Squeamish folk, perhaps, may think that

this is not the most opportune time at which to draw attention to the

blood-lust that was so marked a feature of the French Revolution. But,

granted that you do not suffer from squeams, you will find Miss MARIAN

BOWER a deft weaver of romance. Here love and adventure walk firmly

hand-in-hand, and from the moment _Guillaume-Marc_ makes his entrance upon

the stage until the happy ending is reached any day might have been his

last. The villain, too, is a satisfactory scoundrel, and cunning withal.

"Brains," he considered, "may conceive revolutions, but it is the empty

stomach which propagates them." I wonder whether they have the brains for

it in Berlin.

* * * * *

[Illustration: _Helen_ (_who has been reckoning termination of the War by

counting opposite diner's prune stones_). "MOTHER, I _DO_ BELIEVE IT'S

GOING TO BE _THIS_ YEAR!"]

* * * * *

According to a recent official _communiqué_ from Petrograd, among the

captures on the Caucasian Front was "an apomecometer (an instrument for

estimating altitudes)." It is understood that the latest Turkish estimate

of the "All Highest" was captured with the instrument, but was found to be

unfit for publication.

* * * * *

"The _Weser Zeitung_ now reports from Berlin that deliberations by the

State authorities have led to the decision that from April 15 the meat

ration will be increased to half a kilometre (about 17-1/2 ozs.) per

week."--_Liverpool Daily Post_.

This must refer to the sausage-ration, which by reason of its length and

tenuity is now advertised by the butchers (civilian) of Berlin as "The

HINDENBURG line."

* * * * *

"STEAM LUNCH--50 ft. x 7-1/4 ft., fast, liquid fuel."--_Yachting

Monthly_.

A meal of these dimensions should surely attract the attention both of the

FOOD CONTROLLER and the Liquor Control Board.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 152, April 4, 1917 · 第 41 / 41 题