CHAPTER XVII.

EXTRACTS FROM EARLY REPORTS.

Wide range of subjects on which Mr. Stevenson gave advice--Reports

on ruins of Aberbrothock Abbey--St. Magnus Cathedral, and

Earl’s Palace, Kirkwall--St. Andrews Cathedral--Montrose

Church Spire--Melville Monument, Edinburgh--Lipping

of joints of masonry with cement--Provision for flood

waters in bridges--Hydraulic mortar--Protection of

foreshores--Cycloidal sea wall--Checking drift sand--Night

signal lamps--Cause of heavy seas in Irish Channel--Sea routes

across Irish Channel--Build of ships--Prospective increase

of population--Tidal scour--Unscrewing of bolts by the

waves--Cement Rubble cofferdams--Buoyage system--Observations

on fog signals--Regulations for steam vessels--Notes on

shipwrecks.

Judging from Smeaton’s well known “Reports,” to which all have

access, we may conclude that the “professional advice” given by early

Engineers was very generally accompanied by a fuller and less reserved

discussion of opinion than is to be met with in the brief and technical

Engineering reports of the present day. In early times, Engineers did

not hesitate to express themselves freely on physics, æsthetics, or

commerce, provided their views had a collateral bearing on the subject

under discussion, and this often added to the interest of their reports.

These early Engineers were also consulted on a much wider range of

subjects than the Engineers of modern times. We know that the larger

requirements of modern Engineering demand that its practice should be

classified under distinct branches, such as harbours, navigations,

water works, gas works, lighthouses, or railways, not to mention

electrical and sanitary engineering, and other branches of modern

growth, all of which cannot possibly be advantageously practised by any

one member of the profession; for no one mind can grasp the theoretical

knowledge, and no one life can compass the practical experience, to

enable a man to attain eminence in all these departments of modern

Engineering.

A biographical sketch of Mr. Stevenson’s professional life would,

it seems to me, be incomplete if it did not convey to the reader

some notion, however general, of the wide range of subjects brought

under his notice, in these early times, and of his comprehensive and

suggestive mode of treating every case on which he was professionally

consulted. This object would be only imperfectly attained were I

to restrict my reference to his reports to the examples given in

the preceding chapters; for I have found in his numerous writings

casual notices of a miscellaneous and fragmentary character, many of

which seem to me to be interesting to the profession, and worthy of

preservation, and I propose, in this chapter, to give a few of these

extracts, without order of subject or date; and I think they will

justify my remark as to the great variety and fulness of treatment to

be found in the reports of early Engineers.

* * * * *

It appears, for example, that Mr. Stevenson was often called to advise

on matters which were more related to architecture than engineering.

Of this nature was his tour of inspection to the jails of England,

in company with Sir William Rae, the Sheriff of Edinburgh, in 1813,

referred to in a former chapter.

ABERBROTHOCK RUINS.

In like manner he inspected Aberbrothock Abbey, with Sir Walter Scott

and the Sheriff of Forfar, in 1809, to advise as to preserving the

ruins, some of the turrets being in imminent danger of falling; and

after procuring a survey of the whole building he prepared a report,

with plans and specification, which were submitted to the Barons of

Exchequer, and the work was thereafter carried out under his direction.

ST. MAGNUS CATHEDRAL AND EARL’S PALACE.

He also reported in a similar way to the Sheriff of Orkney with

reference to the repairs of the Earl’s Palace at Kirkwall, estimated at

£500, and on certain alterations at the Cathedral of St. Magnus.

ST. ANDREWS CATHEDRAL AND MONTROSE SPIRE.

With a similar object in view he inspected and reported on the

Cathedral of St. Andrews, and the steeple of the Church of Montrose,

which was thought to be in danger, and the result of that inquiry was

the present beautiful spire, built from the designs of James Gillespie

Graham.

MELVILLE MONUMENT.

He was also associated with Mr. Burn in the Melville Monument of

Edinburgh,--the preparation of the foundation, the rubble work for the

tower, and the scaffolding and tackling for raising the statue were

carried out under Mr. Stevenson’s direction; the whole architectural

design being due to Mr. Burn alone.

LIPPING OF JOINTS OF MASONRY WITH CEMENT.

The well known practice of what is termed “lipping” with cement the

mortar joints of masonry exposed to the wash of water is described by

him as new in his report to the Trustees of Marykirk Bridge, of 16th

July 1812, where he says:--

“Upon carefully examining the face joints of the masonry of the south

pier under water line, some of these were found not to be so full of

mortar as could have been wished, and although Mr. Logan (the inspector

of works) had taken the precaution to cause the joints to be covered

with clay to preserve them from the effects of the water, yet this had

not altogether answered the purpose, and hence the reporter recommended

to the meeting of the 8th current _to provide a few casks of Parker’s

Roman Cement, to be laid to the breadth of three or four inches upon

the bed and end joints under the low water mark of the remaining

piers_.”

PROVISION FOR FLOOD WATER IN BRIDGES.

In determining the waterway of his bridges, Mr. Stevenson invariably

provided for prospective increase of flooding due to agricultural

improvements, as stated in the following extract from a report made in

1811:--

“To preserve an ample waterway the north abutment is placed about

twelve feet from the edge of the river, leaving a sufficient passage

for the water in floods. A less waterway might perhaps have answered

the purpose, but as the valleys through which the North Esk passes may

come to be meliorated by drainage, and especially those districts of

country on each side of the feeders which join the river, the facility

with which the surface water may then escape must greatly increase the

floods, and although their duration will be shorter, yet their rise

must be proportionally higher.”

HYDRAULIC MORTAR.

The following remarks on hydraulic mortar, made in 1811 to the

Commissioners of Montrose Bridge, are interesting as showing the detail

which he brought to bear on all his works:--

“The best mortar for water work is a mixture of Pozzolano earth with

lime and sand, but the late interrupted state of commercial intercourse

with the Mediterranean has for years past rendered Pozzolano so scarce

an article as hardly to be procured on any terms. Your reporter has

therefore been induced to make various experiments with preparations

of lime and Roman cement, and finds that a mixture may be made which

will set under water and answer every purpose. For this mortar the

lime ought to be well burned, and put into casks when drawn from the

kiln. It should be brought to the work as recently after being burnt as

possible. This will be most readily attained by taking the lime from

Boddam kilns. English lime is in general stronger and cleaner, but

some of it brought for the purpose of agriculture is not so suitable

for buildings as Lord Elgin’s lime. These limes, however, cannot be

had very newly burnt, and it will be preferable to take lime from some

of the kilns in the neighbourhood which are of good character. When

brought to the bridge the lime should be kept under cover, opening only

one barrel at a time; the shells must be pounded to a state of powder,

and immediately before mixing it with the other ingredients it will

be proper to sprinkle a little water upon it to dissolve any gritty

particles that may remain amongst it.

“The sand for this work, though fine, must nevertheless be sharp; it

must also be passed through a sieve, and cleaned of all impurities by

washing, if found necessary. For ramming the joints and pointing under

water, let equal parts of lime in its powdered state and of Roman

cement be used, with one fourth part of prepared sand, but for the

upper works the quantity of Roman cement in the mortar may be reduced

to one third part.

“The mortar must be mixed in small quantities and quickly beaten up

into a consistency suitable for the work. All white specks, which are

apt to swell and spoil the joints, must be carefully rejected from the

mortar.”

PROTECTION OF FORESHORES.

Some suggestive remarks on the protection of foreshores, made in 1812,

in a report to Lord Rosebery, on his Lordship’s property at Barnbougle

Castle on the Firth of Forth, are given in the following terms:--

“If the operation of the waters of the ocean be attended to in the

formation of the shores, some useful hints may be gained. These shores

will be found to be so many inclined planes, varying in declivity

according to the tenacity of the matter of which they, are composed.

Hence it is that the minute grains of sand and the light sea shell

become a lasting barrier against the rapid river current and the

tumultuous ocean, while the erect sea wall is levelled with the

ground. For the truth of this it were needless to refer to the works

of nature in different quarters of the world, or in distant parts of

this country; it is only necessary to examine the shores on each side

of Barnbougle Castle, where the beautiful beach, consisting of sand and

shells, between the Cockle Burn and the sea, forms a complete defence

to the low grounds behind it, while to the northward of the castle the

massive wall is in danger of being completely thrown down. Without

waiting to inquire into the causes which regulate these appearances, it

will be more consonant to the business of this report to point out how

their simple forms may be imitated and turned to advantage.”

CYCLOIDAL SEAWALL.

In reporting on the defence of the lands of Trinity, on the Firth of

Forth, Mr. Stevenson recommended the adoption of a cycloidal talus

wall, which was executed under his direction in 1821:--

“In giving an opinion relative to the best mode of defending and

preserving this property, the reporter observes that it fortunately

happens that the beach is pretty closely covered with large boulder

stones, which now form a kind of _chevaux de frise_ in breaking the

force of the sea, and making it fall more gently towards high water

mark. Were it not that these stones are proposed to be employed in the

erection of a more effectual barrier against the waves, the reporter

would not fail to disapprove of their removal for any other purpose.

[Illustration: FIG. 20.]

“The reporter proposes that a _Talus wall_ or bulwark should be

built of these boulder stones, roughly dressed and laid so as to

form a cycloidal curve in the central part, as nearly as may be, as

represented in the section with its tangents (Fig. 20). The properties

of the cycloid as applicable to a sea wall in an exposed situation are

very important. In particular, if compared with any other curve, in the

same vertical line and down through the same points, it will be found

of swiftest descent under similar circumstances, therefore the water

in its rise must be proportionally retarded. The lower tangent to the

curve alluded to also forms a wall towards low water, best adapted

for admitting the sea to flow gently over it, while that connected

with the upper extremity of the cycloidal part, tending towards the

perpendicular, brings gravity into action against the rise of the

waves. The practical execution of a wall upon this construction is

simple, while the aggregate quantity of materials is less than for any

of the curves of the conic sections of similar extent, and it seems

upon the whole to be peculiarly applicable for the defence of the sea

beach in question.

“If we examine the numerous works of this kind erected for similar

purposes along this coast, we shall find that the general process or

action of the waves is to undermine the seaward courses of the walls.

In some cases, however, where due attention has not been paid to

making up the backing of the face wall in a compact and firm manner,

the central parts have been found to sink and give way. But the more

common mode of failure is by the undermining of the seaward courses,

arising from too sudden a slope being given to the face wall, which

has a direct tendency to produce additional agitation in the waters

at the bottom of the wall, by which the beach is excavated, and the

foundation, being exposed to the wash of the sea, its destruction soon

follows. If we attend to the distribution which nature makes of the

matters composing a sea beach, unless where special local causes occur,

we find them laid with a very gradual descent towards low water mark.

The sands of Portobello, in this neighbourhood, form a striking example

of this. Here small quartzose grains mixed with light sea shells prove,

in their effects, a more effectual barrier against the overwhelming

force of the waves than perpendicular and massive walls of masonry.”

CHECKING DRIFT SAND.

Mr. Stevenson recommended Lord Palmerston to introduce the _Pinus

maritima major_, as a check for sand drift, on his estate of

Mullaghmore, in the following report, dated 21st July 1835:--

“During the reporter’s visit to Mullaghmore, his advice was also asked

regarding the operations at present going on for the improvement of

the land. He had then much satisfaction in viewing the interesting

improvements of reclaiming bog lands, and checking the inroads of the

sand flood or drift, by planting ‘bent’ grass upon the shores of this

estate. The system of dibbling the bent grass, pursued by Mr. Lynch,

is in the best style which the reporter has anywhere met with; and he

has been so impressed with the national importance of this scheme, from

the success already experienced at Mullaghmore, that he has already

taken the opportunity of recommending this system as applicable to the

entrance of Ballyshannon, and in other quarters, particularly to the

Highland and Agricultural Society of Scotland.

“The question chiefly submitted to the consideration of the reporter,

in regard to these operations, was the best mode of defending the

margin of the bent grass towards the sea. For such purposes, buildings

or fences of any kind are not only expensive in their formation, but

are also in constant need of repair. Mr. Lynch seems so much at home

in all planting operations that the reporter begs simply to bring

under your Lordship’s notice the French mode of planting a species

of fir (_Pinus maritima major_), which was originally suggested to

the Government by the late M. Bremonteuil, _Ingénieur des Ponts et

Chaussées_. This system has been extensively tried along the stormy

shores of the Bay of Biscay, particularly in the district of Grave, at

the entrance of the Garonne, where the arid and sterile sands have been

covered with extensive forests, which thrive quite close to the water’s

edge. From the climate and exposure of the shores at Mullaghmore,

the reporter has no doubt of the success of similar plantations in

arresting the progress of the sand flood. It is believed that Mr.

Lawson, seedsman to the Highland and Agricultural Society of Scotland,

is taking measures to import the seeds of the _Pinus maritima major_,

with a view to trying it on some of the exposed sandy districts of

Scotland.”

From the following extract of a letter from Mr. Kincaid of Dublin, who

was Lord Palmerston’s Commissioner, it is interesting to know that the

experiment was entirely satisfactory, proving that the _Pinus maritima

major_ is well adapted to the climate of the coasts of the British

Isles:--

“The Mullaghmore plantations extend to about 200 acres. About eighty

of these were planted twenty-five years ago. Some of the trees are

thirty feet in height, and vary from that height to about twenty or

twenty-five feet. The remainder were planted ten years ago, and are

making fair progress. All the pine plantations from opposite Newtown

Cliffony to Mullaghmore are in a most healthy condition, the trees

making growths of from twelve to twenty inches each year. The storms

have no bad effect on the south side of the great sand hill, but on its

summit, and towards the west side, the spray and gales of the Atlantic

will not allow the young trees to make any progress.”

NIGHT SIGNAL LAMPS.

In a report to the Trustees for improving the Queensferry passage, made

in 1811, Mr. Stevenson proposes a set of signals as described in the

following extract, his proposal being, in fact, the signal now in use

on all British railways:--

“Upon the supposition of its being the intention of this Honourable

Trust to have an establishment on the south side of the Firth similar

to that which is now proposed for the north side, the reporter takes

the liberty of observing that much advantage, as the Trustees know,

might be derived by the public from a few simple and well appointed

signals, both for night and day.

“Those intended for the day may be constructed upon a modified scale,

after the common telegraphic method; while the night signals can be

rendered extremely simple and effective by interposing at pleasure

between the observer and the reflector a shade of coloured glass. By

connecting these partial obscurations of colouring the light with an

index that shall be understood on both sides of the passage, orders may

be communicated in a very expeditious manner.”

CAUSE OF HEAVY SEAS IN IRISH CHANNEL.

In a report to the Right Honourable Viscount Cathcart, Commander of His

Majesty’s Forces, made on Portpatrick harbour in 1812, he gives the

following explanation of the well-known rough sea between Portpatrick

and Donaghadee:--

“In describing the harbour of Portpatrick, it may be noticed that

although the coast on which it is situated is not directly exposed

to the Atlantic Ocean, yet the opposing tides of the north and south

channels meet there and separate to flow up the Clyde and Solway

Firths, which, independent of storms, must occasion a very considerable

commotion in the waters of the channel between Portpatrick and

Donaghadee.

“Accordingly we find that the sea has made a great impression upon

the coast of Wigtonshire; and though the shores between Loch Ryan

and the Bay of Glenluce consist chiefly of whinstone (the greenstone

of mineralogists), which is one of the most indestructible rocks we

have, yet the figure of the coast is indented with many small cuts or

creeks, and rocks are all along the shore found jutting into the sea.

At the head of one of these creeks, which is about a hundred fathoms in

length, and thirty fathoms in breadth, the harbour of Portpatrick is

situated between two insulated rocks, upon one of which the piers are

built, the harbour being formed by an excavation, chiefly in the solid

rock.”

SEA ROUTES ACROSS IRISH CHANNEL.

In the same report he states the relative advantages of various routes

of communication across the Irish Channel:--

“A further extension of the intercourse between Scotland and Ireland

could be made with much advantage to both by a regular establishment of

packets between Ardrossan, Troon, or Dunure in Ayrshire, and Larne in

the county of Antrim. Between the two last places, viz., Dunure and

Larne, the distance would only be about sixty miles, being ten miles

shorter, and unquestionably much safer, than the passage from Holyhead

to Dublin.

“Under all the views of this subject, from the greater contiguity

of Portpatrick and Donaghadee than of Lochs Ryan and Larne, and the

former places having more immediate access to the open sea than the

latter, and also from the intercourse being now fully organised by

long establishment, it were perhaps better, even at a much greater

expense, to continue the present system than to change it. Portpatrick

harbour may be rendered incomparably better by the plan now proposed,

and Donaghadee is also capable and stands much in want of improvement,

by an extension of its piers and the erection of a permanent light to

direct the packets into the harbour under night.”

BUILD OF SHIPS.

In reporting to the Royal Burgh of Dundee as to the improvement of the

harbour in 1814, Mr. Stevenson takes occasion to introduce one of those

collateral questions to which I have referred:--

“It is curious to observe the changes and to trace the progressive

improvements which have taken place in the form and _build_ of ships.

When we contrast those of early navigators with ships of modern

times, among the many alterations, none seems more striking than the

difference of their depth. The draught of water that was required for a

ship of 300 tons burden would hardly be found enough to float a modern

built vessel of 100 tons. This alteration in the construction of

ships, which is mainly calculated to improve their sailing, by giving

them a better hold of the water, seems gradually to have advanced, as

the mariner became more adventurous in his voyages; and is only now

restrained by certain considerations of convenience, of which the most

prominent is the want of a sufficient depth of water in the havens and

harbours on the coast for their reception,--a circumstance which arises

partly from the natural position of harbours, but is chiefly owing

to the difficulties and expense attending the necessary engineering

operations, which increase enormously with the depth of water. Hence

it is that many of the ancient seaport towns of this country, which

at one time possessed an extensive trade, have, from neglecting their

harbours, sunk into a state of insignificancy; while others, by

proper exertions in this respect, have, under the most inauspicious

circumstances, attained to great commercial importance.”

PROSPECTIVE INCREASE OF POPULATION.

Another case of the same kind occurs in his report on the harbour of

North Berwick, made in 1812:--

“Before closing this report it may be noticed that North Berwick has

considerable advantages, which if acted upon would infallibly lead to

the rapid improvement of the town and neighbourhood. Situated upon an

extensive flat which skirts along the high land of North Berwick Law,

on a beautiful sandy bay, which is intersected by the street leading to

the harbour, few towns will more easily admit of elegant extension or

are better calculated for becoming a sea-bathing retreat.”

It has now the well-known reputation of being the best frequented

watering place on the east coast of Scotland.

TIDAL SCOUR.

In the report, of 1814, on Dundee we find the following remarks on

tidal scour:--

“To put this matter in a clearer point of view, let us see what nature

does upon the great scale, as for example in the extensive basin

forming the Firth of Tay. We there find that in consequence of the

rapidity of the current at the narrow passage in the neighbourhood of

Broughty Castle, which may be viewed as the _scouring aperture_ of the

basin of the Tay, the water is from forty to eighty feet in depth, and

moves with a velocity which carries a great quantity of sandy particles

along with it. But no sooner are the waters of this current allowed to

spread and cover the basin of the Tay, than the velocity ceases, and

the foreign matters fall to the bottom and form the various sandbanks

which appear at low water. In a similar way the deposition of silt and

earthy particles brought down the river in speats is accounted for.

Now, this view of the case is equally applicable to the harbour of

Dundee, for so long as the water preserves the velocity it acquires in

the _scouring apertures_ or arches in the quays, it carries all its

foreign matters along with it; but the moment it is allowed to expand

over the extent of the harbour the deposition of these earthy particles

begins. And in every case the well-known law in hydraulics holds good,

that the _scouring effect_ of a fluid is in the ratio of the square of

the velocity.”

UNSCREWING OF BOLTS.

The following observations made in 1807 on the action of the waves in

unscrewing bolts, are interesting:--

“The unlocking of screws, where _washers_ had been introduced as a

security was rather unexpected, and the writer took an opportunity of

conversing with his much respected friend Professor Playfair regarding

this circumstance. The Professor observed, that he had experienced some

inconvenience of this kind from the unlocking of almost all the screws

of a telescope which had been sent to him from London by the mail

coach. Indeed, from the spiral form of the screw, which is, in fact, an

inclined plane, Mr. Playfair readily accounted for such an occurrence,

and, when reflected upon, it seems to be an effect rather to be looked

for, and is a reason why riveting the point of a bolt in preference to

screwing it should generally be resorted to, where much motion is to be

apprehended.”

CEMENT RUBBLE COFFERDAMS.

I give his description of the cement rubble cofferdams, first used in

1808, at the erection of the Bell Rock Lighthouse:--

“At seven o’clock this morning, the tide proving more favourable,

the artificers began to work. At nine o’clock the rock was again

overflowed, and the boats returned to the tender after two hours’

work. Part of the operations of this morning’s tide consisted in

building up the crevices and inequalities of the rock round the margin

of the foundation with Pozzolano mortar and the chips produced from

excavation, with the view to dam out the water. These little walls

varied from six to eighteen inches in height; a small sluice or

aperture being formed in one of them, by which the water, during ebb

tide, was allowed to drain off.

“It formed part of the writer’s original design to erect a cast iron

cofferdam of about five feet in height round the site of the building;

but the surface of the rock was so irregular that the difficulty of

tightening it, and also of emptying the contained water, so as to get

the benefit of it during ebb tide, would have been so great, that

taking these circumstances into account, together with the loss of time

which would attend the erection of such a preparatory work, the idea

of a cofferdam was laid aside, soon after entering upon the actual

execution of the work.”

BUOYAGE SYSTEM.

In his report on the Forth Navigation, made to the Magistrates of

Stirling in 1828, Mr. Stevenson proposed a system of buoyage, which

has since been adopted by the several Lighthouse Boards of the United

Kingdom:--

“The channels proposed to be cleared through the different fords are

coloured red on the Plan, in reference to the sectional line. For the

use and guidance of river pilots, buoys and perches or beacons are

likewise intended to be placed in the positions shown in the Plan;

those coloured red are to be taken on the starboard, and those coloured

black upon the larboard side, in going up the river; and the whole are

to be so placed in connection with the clearing and deepening of the

fords as to be approached with safety.”

OBSERVATIONS ON FOG SIGNALS.

At a very early period Mr. Stevenson’s attention was directed to the

dangers of fog at sea, and the best means of providing an effective

fog signal for the mariner, and so long ago as 1808 he had come to

the conclusion that the best signal adapted for the purpose was the

sustained sound of a horn, which, as is well known, has within the last

few years been so much employed in the fog signals which are now being

established at many of the lighthouse stations in this and foreign

countries. The following extracts give an idea of the difficulties he

encountered, and his views on the subject:--

“The boats landed this evening (23d June 1808), when the artificers

had again two hours’ work. The weather still continuing very thick

and foggy, more difficulty was experienced in getting on board of the

vessels to-night than had occurred on any previous occasion, owing

to a light breeze of wind which carried the sound of the bell, and

the other signals made on board of the vessels, away from the rock.

Having fortunately made out the position of the sloop “Smeaton,” at the

north-east buoy, to which we were much assisted by the barking of the

ship’s dog, we parted with the Smeaton’s boat, when the boats of the

tender took a fresh departure for that vessel, which lay about half a

mile to the south westward. Yet such is the very deceiving state of

the tides that although there was a small binnacle and compass in the

landing master’s boat, we had nevertheless passed the ‘Sir Joseph’ a

good way, when fortunately one of the sailors caught the sound of a

blowing horn. The only fire-arms on board were a pair of swivels of one

inch calibre; but it is quite surprising how much the sound is lost in

foggy weather, as the report was heard but at a very short distance.

The sound from the explosion of gunpowder is so instantaneous that

the effect of the small guns was not so good as either the blowing of

a horn or the tolling of a bell, which afforded a more constant and

steady direction for the pilot. It may here be noticed that larger guns

would have answered better, but these must have induced the keeping of

a greater stock of gunpowder, which in a service of this kind might

have been attended with risk. A better signal would have been a bugle

horn, the tremulous sound of which produces a more powerful effect in

fog than the less sonorous and more sudden report of ordnance.”

And again he says:--

“In the course of this morning’s work two or three apparently distant

peals of thunder were heard, and the atmosphere suddenly became thick

and foggy. But as the Smeaton, our present tender, was moored at no

great distance from the rock, the crew on board continued blowing a

horn, and occasionally fired a musket, so that the boats got to the

ship without difficulty. The occurrence of thick weather, however,

became a serious consideration in looking forward to the necessary

change of quarters to the Pharos, distant about one mile from the rock,

instead of a few hundred yards, as in the case of the Smeaton.

“The weather towards the evening became thick and foggy, and there was

hardly a breath of wind to ruffle the surface of the water; had it not

therefore been the noise from the anvils of the smiths, who had been

left on the beacon throughout the day, which afforded a guide for the

boats, a landing could not have been attempted this evening, especially

with so large a company of artificers. This circumstance confirmed the

writer’s opinion with regard to the propriety of connecting large bells

to be rung with machinery in the lighthouse, to be tolled day and night

during the continuance of foggy weather, by which the mariner may be

forewarned of too near an approach to the rock, while every distant

object is obscured in the mist.”

Following out this subject, Mr. Stevenson caused observations to be

made at the Calf of Man--a small island at the south of the Isle of

Man, and separated from the main island by a narrow “sound.” The place

is noted for its fogs, on which Mr. Stevenson says:--

“I sent Mr. Macurich, a shipmaster in the lighthouse service, to the

Calf of Man, with directions to reside there, and make monthly returns

of the state of the weather, agreeably to a printed form. During his

stay of seven months, it appears upon the whole that the fog rested

only twice upon the highest land of the Calf Island, while it cleared

partially below. On one of these occasions I was on board of the

lighthouse yacht, then at anchor off the island, when the fog was for

a time general; and as the weather became clear, I observed that it

first disappeared upon the lower parts of the island, and that in half

an hour the whole of the Calf was seen. In the monthly returns made by

Mr. Macurich, the Calf island is represented as often perfectly free

of fog, while the higher parts of the opposite mainland of the Isle of

Man were hid in mist. To account for this, it may be noticed that the

mass of matter in the Calf Island is much less, and the land is also

much lower than in the main island. Part of this effect may also be

ascribed to the rapidity of the tides, which create a current of wind,

particularly in the narrow channel between the main and Calf islands,

which have a direct tendency to clear away the fog, as I have observed

at the Skerries in the Pentland Firth, and in similar situations on

different parts of the coast, where rapid currents prevail.”

These extracts are given to show the attention Mr. Stevenson gave to

the subject of fogs, which, as already noticed, led him to recommend

the horn, the instrument now so much used in giving signals to the

mariner.

Akin to this may be mentioned his expression of regret that no means

existed for determining the force of the wind, as noticed in the

following paragraph:--

“We cannot enough regret the want of an efficient anemometer, or

instrument for measuring the force of the wind. Indeed, we hardly know

any desideratum of more universal interest, for, notwithstanding the

labours of Lind and others on this subject, from the want of a proper

scale we are still groping in the dark with the use of such indefinite

terms as ‘light airs inclining to calm,’ ‘fresh breezes,’ ‘fresh

gales,’ ‘hard gales,’ and ‘very hard gales;’ for it rarely happens that

the sailor will admit the term ‘storm’ into his nomenclature.”

REGULATIONS FOR STEAM VESSELS.

The loss of the ‘Comet’ steamer by collision on the Clyde, in 1825, led

the Lord Advocate to entertain the idea of introducing a Bill for the

regulation of steamers, and to issue a circular in the following terms,

of which Mr. Stevenson received a copy:--

“EDINBURGH, _4th Feby. 1826_.

I annex a copy of the heads of such a Bill as, in my opinion, may

be calculated to afford sufficient security to steamboats, and

thereby alike promote the interests of the owners of such vessels

and that of the public. I feel noways wedded to any of the proposed

provisions, and am anxious to submit them to the consideration of

the better informed on such subjects, so as to obtain suggestions

either as to the additions or amendments which the Bill may be

fitted to receive.

“In directing your attention to this important subject, I need

hardly remind you that in our endeavours to render such vessels

perfectly secure in so far as respects the passengers, we must

not lose sight of the interest of the owners, or attempt to clog

the trade with unnecessarily embarrassing regulations. Such

restrictions are seldom enforced, and, if they should receive

effect, might lead to such harassing consequences as would injure

this useful description of property, and thereby to a certain

extent deprive the public of the great benefit which is now derived

from the use of vessels navigated by steam.--I have the honour to

be your most obedient servant,

“WM. RAE.”

The only account I can find of Mr. Stevenson’s views on this important

subject is contained in the following extract from a letter, dated

3d November 1825, to Captain Foulerton, one of the Wardens of the

Trinity House, with whom he appears to have had much correspondence,

in which he explains views which are very much in accordance with the

regulations for steamers now issued by the Board of Trade. His letter

says:--

“We lately had a melancholy accident, as you would see, by the running

down of the ‘Comet’ steam packet, by which, it is believed, that about

seventy people lost their lives. The Lord Advocate attended himself at

the taking of the precognition, and is, I believe, to bring some of the

parties to trial. He has also in view some regulations by an Act on

this new and important subject.

“From my seeming marine habits his Lordship has desired me to state

what occurs on the subject of lights. If we need this on the Forth and

Clyde, you must be in a worse state in the Thames. I have no doubt you

had this under the notice of your House. I think there should be two

lights, one in each bow, but under deck, in order to keep the lights

_entirely_ out of the view of those on deck. I am not for interfering

with their head sails. I would have them licensed like stage coaches,

and placed under the inspection of an officer of the navy, not below

the rank of a lieutenant. Six or eight officers might do the duty for

the whole United Kingdom for a time.”

The accident seems to have led to a further investigation into the

general question of the saving of life in cases of shipwreck on

the coasts of Scotland; and on this subject Mr. Stevenson made the

following replies to the queries submitted to him by the authorities:--

“QUERY.--Are shipwrecks frequent on the coasts of Scotland and

its islands?”

“Wrecks between the Firths of Forth and Moray are more frequent than on

any other part of the coast of Scotland. This may probably be accounted

for by the great number of vessels passing and repassing along that

coast. In the month of December 1799, a strong gale from the south-east

occasioned serious disasters on these shores, when upwards of seventy

sail were wrecked on the eastern coast of Scotland, and many of their

crews perished. This lamentable catastrophe was the means of causing

lifeboats upon Greathead’s plan to be fitted out at St. Andrews,

Arbroath, Montrose, Aberdeen, Peterhead, and other places, which have

been found highly useful in saving the lives of mariners. This gale was

also the immediate cause of the erection of the Bell Rock Lighthouse,

which may be said almost entirely to have prevented shipwreck, so

frequent in St. Andrews Bay and the entrance of the Firth of Forth in

general.

“From the Moray Firth along the shores of the mainland to the entrance

of the Firth of Clyde, wrecks cannot be said to be very frequent,

although the navigation is rather difficult; but the safety of shipping

on this coast depends upon the great number of excellent natural bays

and harbours upon it.

“In the Orkney and Shetland Islands few seasons pass without wrecks

occurring. On the Lewis and Western Hebrides shipwrecks frequently

occur.”

“QUERY.--Are the coasts of Scotland in general well provided

with the means of giving assistance in case of shipwreck,

or are they deficient in such provision?”

“The coast of Scotland is provided with no other means of saving the

crews of vessels than the assistance they accidentally meet with from

the inhabitants along shore. The only lifeboats established are those

at the ports already mentioned.

“If Captain Manby’s apparatus was generally known and applied upon the

coast, it would be found highly beneficial.”

“QUERY.--Are any instances remembered of total shipwrecks where

lives lost might have been saved by the lifeboat or by

Captain Manby’s apparatus, at the distance of 350 or 400

yards off the coast?”

“In the year 1813 the ‘Oscar,’ Greenland ship of Aberdeen, Captain

Innes, went ashore upon Girdleness, at the entrance of Aberdeen

Harbour. There were on board fifty-four persons, of whom only two were

saved, by dropping from the bowsprit end. The ship was very near the

shore. She broke up about twenty minutes after she struck, and I have

no doubt that, if an active person had been on the spot with Captain

Manby’s apparatus, the greater part of the crew of this ship might have

been saved.

“In the winter of 1824 the ‘Deveron’ of Aberdeen, Captain Scott, went

ashore upon the sands three miles north of Aberdeen in a gale at

south-east. She was only about 300 yards from the shore, and here the

whole crew must have perished had it not been for the prompt use of

Captain Manby’s apparatus.

“Every one who has seen this apparatus must have admired its simplicity

and effect. It is however difficult to see how its application can be

very generally introduced so as to be useful along the whole extent of

chequered coasts of the British dominions. Certainly at all principal

ports it would naturally be expected that both this and the lifeboat

would be provided.

“A time seems to be approaching when the coast will be much more

complete in all such provision from the hands of the humane for the

safety of the mariner. We also hail with pleasure the extending efforts

of the respective Lighthouse Boards on the coasts of England, Scotland,

and Ireland, as a certain means of adding to the security of that

useful body of men, as well as to the facilities of her enterprising

merchants. Nor can we withhold the notice of the effect of the

operations of the Scots Board in this respect. At the entrance to the

Firth of Forth, prior to the erection of the Bell Rock Lighthouse, few

winters passed without some disastrous shipwreck.

“Even after the completion of this arduous undertaking, until the

beacon was erected on the Carr Rock, off Fifeness, the fisherman’s

observation was--‘The Carr has always her wreck: if she misses one

year, she is sure to have two the next.’ But since the erection of this

beacon in 1820 till this date (1825), not a single wreck has happened

on this part of the coast.”

Life of Robert Stevenson, Civil Engineer · 第 17 / 18 章