I.--THE LAW OF NATIONS.

It seems certain that Mexico must ultimately submit to such terms of

peace as the United States shall dictate. An heterogeneous population of

seven millions, with very limited resources and no credit; distracted by

internal dissensions, and by the ambition of its chiefs, a prey by turns

to anarchy and to military usurpers; occupying among the nations of the

civilized world, either physically or mentally, whether in political

education, social state, or any other respect, but an inferior position;

cannot contend successfully with an energetic, intelligent, enlightened

and united nation of twenty millions, possessed of unlimited resources

and credit, and enjoying all the benefits of a regular, strong, and free

government. All this was anticipated; but the extraordinary successes of

the Americans have exceeded the most sanguine expectations. All the

advanced posts of the enemy, New Mexico, California, the line of the

lower Rio Norte, and all the sea ports, which it was deemed necessary to

occupy, have been subdued. And a small force, apparently incompetent to

the object, has penetrated near three hundred miles into the interior,

and is now in quiet possession of the far-famed metropolis of the

Mexican dominions. The superior skill and talents of our distinguished

generals, and the unparalleled bravery of our troops, have surmounted

all obstacles. By whomsoever commanded on either side; however strong

the positions and fortifications of the Mexicans, and with a tremendous

numerical superiority, there has not been a single engagement, in which

they have not been completely defeated. The most remarkable and

unexpected feature of that warfare is, that volunteers, wholly

undisciplined in every sense of the word, have vied in devotedness and

bravery with the regular forces, and have proved themselves, in every

instance, superior in the open field to the best regular forces of

Mexico. These forces are now annihilated or dispersed; and the Mexicans

are reduced to a petty warfare of guerillas which, however annoying,

cannot be productive of any important results.

It is true, that these splendid successes have been purchased at a price

far exceeding their value. It is true that, neither the glory of these

military deeds, nor the ultimate utility of our conquests can

compensate the lamentable loss of the many thousand valuable lives

sacrificed in the field, of the still greater number who have met with

an obscure death, or been disabled by disease and fatigue. It is true

that their relatives, their parents, their wives and children find no

consolation, for the misery inflicted upon them, in the still greater

losses experienced by the Mexicans. But if, disregarding private

calamities and all the evils of a general nature, the necessary

consequences of this war, we revert solely to the relative position of

the two countries, the impotence of the Mexicans and their total

inability to continue the war, with any appearance of success, are still

manifest.

The question then occurs: What are the terms which the United States

have a right to impose on Mexico? All agree that it must be an

"honorable peace;" but the true meaning of this word must in the first

place be ascertained.

The notion, that anything can be truly honorable which is contrary to

justice, will, as an abstract proposition, be repudiated by every

citizen of the United States. Will any one dare to assert, that a peace

can be honorable, which does not conform with justice?

There is no difficulty in discovering the principles by which the

relations between civilized and Christian nations should be regulated,

and the reciprocal duties which they owe to each other. These

principles, these duties have long since been proclaimed; and the true

law of nations is nothing else than the conformity to the sublime

precepts of the Gospel morality, precepts equally applicable to the

relations between man and man, and to the intercourse between nation and

nation. "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself." "Love your enemies."

"As you would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise."

The sanctity of these commands is acknowledged, without a single

exception, by every denomination of Christians, or of men professing to

be such. The sceptical philosopher admits and admires the precept. To

this holy rule we should inflexibly adhere when dictating the terms of

peace. The United States, though they have the power, have no right to

impose terms inconsistent with justice. It would be a shameful

dereliction of principle, on the part of those who were averse to the

annexation of Texas, to countenance any attempt to claim an acquisition

of territory, or other advantage, on account of the success of our

arms.

But in judging the acts of our Government, it must be admitted that

statesmen think a conformity to these usages which constitute the law of

nations, not as it should be, but as it is practically, sufficient to

justify their conduct. And by that inferior standard, those acts and our

duties in relation to Mexico will be tested.

Peace with Mexico · 第 3 / 10 题