CHAPTER III

THE VITICULTURE OF NEW YORK

The history of the viticulture of eastern United States shows that the

regions in which grapes have been most largely grown in the past have

come into prominence, had their day, and then suffered a decline. The

reasons for the more or less temporary character of grape regions are

becoming more and more apparent as our knowledge of grape-growing

increases. The grape, more than most other domesticated plants, is

profoundly influenced by climate, soil, cultural treatment, and insect

and fungus pests. In any region in which the grape succeeds at all well,

conditions are more favorable at the start of the industry than later;

this is especially true as regards soils, and the insect and fungus

pests. In a discussion of any phase of grape culture, in a broad sense,

the conditions under which the fruit is grown must receive careful

consideration. We therefore include in this chapter a discussion of the

characters which most strongly influence grapes in vine, fruit and

general adaptability; also a brief discussion of the regions in which

native grapes have been successfully grown in America; and, more

particularly, an account of the viticulture and the grape regions of New

York.

In their wild state the various species of native grapes seem adapted to

a great diversity of soils and conditions. But under successful

cultivation varieties of the several species are confined to somewhat

restricted regions and even localities. Often a grape variety will

succeed on one shore of a lake or river and not on the other; on one

slope of a hill but not another. It is difficult to point out the

determinants of successful grape culture. Adaptability can be known

positively in many cases only by trial; for neither conditions of soil,

nor climate, nor lay of land determines with certainty the adaptability

of a given locality. Oftentimes one variety of a species may not be

successful while another is completely so. Many varieties reach

perfection in one region or locality but not in another though the

conditions may seem very similar. So great is the influence of local

environment, oftentimes, that a variety grown in one locality might not

be recognized as the same grape when produced under other conditions.

The chief natural factors which govern the distribution of varieties of

grapes are: Latitude and altitude; temperature of air and soil; water

supply; the chemical and physical properties of the soil; air currents;

and insects and fungi.

Latitude and altitude very largely determine the annual temperature, the

amount and intensity of sunlight, and the length of the growing

season--all very important factors in growing grapes. Species and

varieties of grapes are usually adapted to regions having about the same

latitude; northern types do not succeed in the South nor the reverse.

Length of season has more to do with the adaptation of grapes than the

degree of heat or cold, for some southern sorts are hardy in vine in the

North but the seasons in the northern latitude are not sufficiently long

for the fruit to mature. On the other hand, northern varieties mature

too quickly in the South and pass through maturity to decay with too

great rapidity. The metes and bounds of latitude are often set aside in

grape-growing by local modifications. Thus it often happens that valleys

in regions not generally adapted to viticulture are so protected from

cold winds, so open to sunshine, or are so free from fogs or frosts as

to furnish ideal conditions for grape-growing.

Probably the chief factor in determining the adaptability of a region to

grape culture is temperature. Each of the different species and

varieties of grapes requires a certain amount of warmth for its best

development and can endure but a certain degree of cold. The temperature

of a region is chiefly determined by latitude, altitude and proximity to

large bodies of water, though variations in the surface of the country

are often important modifying agents of temperature and especially

influence spring and fall frosts.

The grape does best in an equable temperature and does not thrive in

regions where there is a great daily range. Regions and seasons in which

the temperature is comparatively low in the growing months of May, June

and July and high, with much sunshine, in the maturing months of August,

September and October, produce the best grapes in the latitude of New

York. An average of from 55° to 65° for the first named period and of

from 65° to 75° for the second are ideal temperature conditions for the

grape.

This fruit is very sensitive to moisture conditions. Not only must the

total rainfall for the year be taken into consideration but its

distribution throughout the seasons must be considered. The grape does

best with comparatively little rainfall. When the rainfall is the least

possible amount for a good growth of vine the grape crop will be the

largest, of best quality and most free from fungi. Wet seasons, and

especially wetness during the months of maturing, are disastrous to both

quantity and quality of grapes. Thus, in New York it is not possible,

with most varieties, to produce good grapes if the average is above six

inches each for the three growing months and five inches each for the

maturing months. It is far better for the crop that it be as low as four

inches for the first named period and two inches for the second period.

Superfluous moisture in the soil favors too great a growth of vine,

checks and weakens the root system, prevents proper setting of fruit,

and favors fungi, but hinders the multiplication of phylloxera. In

particular, a comparatively dry soil is desirable for grapes because of

its influence on the development of the root system. In dry soils large

root systems are developed in the search for the water that the plant

must have. When intense droughts occur plants that have stood in damp

soils have not sufficient roots to supply the necessary water to the

aerial parts and the vines suffer in consequence. Some species and

varieties are better fitted for withstanding an excess of moisture than

others.

The soil exercises a great influence in determining the suitability of a

region for viticulture. Several factors act as soil determinants: (1)

Fertility; (2) physical characters; (3) soil heat. It is necessary to

study each species, and even their varieties, to discover their powers

of adaptation to different soils and it is possible to indicate here the

good and bad qualities of soils only in the most general way. In the

discussion of species and varieties the soil preferences of the

different botanical and horticultural groups will be stated more fully.

Great fertility, as a natural characteristic, is not necessary in grape

regions. Fertilizers, and especially the use of stable manures and cover

crops, can be made to supply very largely a lack of fertility. Soils

naturally too rich produce an overdevelopment of vine. Some species, as

_Vitis rupestris_, grow naturally in very poor soils, the habitat of the

latter being dry ravines and stony places having comparatively little

organic matter. The varieties of _Vitis rupestris_ promise well for

stocks upon which to grow other varieties in certain soils. In Europe

calcareous or limy soils are not considered well adapted to

grape-growing, but in America we often find very good vineyards on such

soils.

The physical character of a soil has more to do with the welfare of the

grape than fertility. Sand and clay are the two distinct types of soils

usually found in general agricultural regions. As one or the other

predominates soils take their character. So far as growth alone is

concerned these two types of soil do not influence the vines much

differently, but the fruit in quantity and quality is greatly influenced

by them. According as to whether sand or clay is in excess a soil is

loose or compact, retains or gives up water, and is warm or cool. A

compact soil is made so by an excess of clay or of very fine sand.

Grapes require a light friable soil and compactness is often a serious

defect. Usually species and varieties with large, thick roots are better

adapted to compact soils than those with small root systems, probably

because the strong roots have greater penetrating power than the weak

ones. Lightness and permeability of the soil may be influenced by

subsoiling and through the use of stable manure and cover crops, but a

hard soil is generally so ill adapted to grape-growing that this fruit

should not be planted on it.

The heat-retaining properties of a soil must always be taken into

account in growing grapes. The great preference which many varieties of

grapes show for sands, loams, shales and gravels, depends largely upon

the greater amount of heat found in such soils. In northern regions it

is especially needful that the soil furnish an abundance of bottom heat

for the grape. The removal of an excess of moisture is helpful in

regulating soil heat; and, other things being equal, a well-drained soil

is warmest.

Grapes grow more or less well in any soil adapted to fruit-growing. It

is not true, even, that the grape is more particular as to soils than

other fruits. But the necessity of having great quantity and high

quality of fruit in profitable viticulture makes it very necessary to

take their preferences as to soil into strict account.

Air currents are of minor importance compared with the other factors

discussed yet are worthy of attention. They are chiefly of importance in

grape-growing in the suppression of fungi. It has long been noticed

that in regions where there are strong currents of air the dreaded

black-rot and the mildew are not nearly so harmful. Winds may be

beneficial, too, when they bring warm air, when moisture laden, when

they keep frosty air in motion, and possibly they have an effect on some

small insects as the leaf-hopper. On the contrary they may be

detrimental when too dry, strong or cold. Natural or artificial

windbreaks may greatly modify the effects of wind currents though their

value is usually overestimated as their benefits are often offset by the

undesirable conditions caused.

Lastly, the prevalence or lack of insects and fungi in a region may

decide its value for viticulture. In several instances flourishing

viticultural industries have been destroyed in this country by insects

or fungi, or both. In other regions the present supremacy of commercial

grape-growing is almost wholly due to the fact that neither insects nor

fungi are seriously troublesome. The advent of spraying and a better

knowledge of the life histories of insects and fungi are lessening the

importance of the parasite factor in determining the value of a region

for grape-growing, but it is still of high importance.

We are now prepared to take up a discussion of the grape regions of New

York.

The states in which the growing of American grapes takes the rank of an

industry are, according to the census of 1900, in order of production:

New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas,

Missouri, Georgia and Oklahoma. The value of the product in the leading

state was $2,763,711; in the last named state, $128,500. American

viticulture, so far as native grapes are concerned, is almost wholly

confined to twelve states. But viticultural interests are still further

localized. In New York the industry is divided into four great regions,

the Chautauqua district, the Central Lakes district, the Hudson

district, and the Niagara district. In Pennsylvania and Ohio

grape-growing is largely confined to the shores of Lake Erie; in

Michigan to a small district about the towns of Lawton and Paw Paw; in

Missouri, Hermann is the representative point for grape culture.

THE CHAUTAUQUA DISTRICT.

Of the four grape regions of New York the Chautauqua district is by far

the most important though, excepting the Niagara, the most recent in

development. The Chautauqua grape belt lies along the southeastern shore

of Lake Erie. It averages about three miles in width and is about fifty

miles long. Its northeastern boundary is in Erie County but not far from

the line dividing Erie and Chautauqua Counties; its western boundary, in

New York, is the Pennsylvania line, an arbitrary division, for the

district passes into Pennsylvania. This narrow belt passes through the

towns of Hanover, Sheridan, Dunkirk, Pomfret, Portland, Westfield and

Ripley in Chautauqua County. Not all, but much, of the land is suitable

for grape-growing.

The topography, geology, and soils of this grape-belt have been

carefully mapped and studied.[93][94]

The grape land is, as we have seen, a narrow strip of comparatively low

land which borders the shore of Lake Erie. On the southern boundary of

this low plain is a high hill or escarpment parallel to the lake and

surmounting the grape belt throughout its entire length. This

escarpment, the "Hill", ranges from 500 to 700 feet above the plain and

from 500 to 1000 feet above the lake. The plain is gently rolling and

ascends from the bluff of the lake to the escarpment with a grade of

from one to two hundred feet to the mile, forming in some places

well-marked foot-hills to the escarpment proper.

The bed rock, according to Tarr[95] is upper Devonian shales and sand

stones in both plain and escarpment. On the face of the escarpment and

on the table lands of some of the foot-hills the soil is so thin that

the plough frequently touches bed rock. This seldom comes to the surface

on the plain except in stream beds and in shale ridges, but is to be

found in fragments of greater or less size and in more or less abundance

throughout the soils of the entire district. Everywhere on the plain may

be seen ancient beach lines. These rise usually in two well-defined

terraces but not infrequently there are from two to five distinct

terraces between the lake and the escarpment. All conditions point to

the theory that these ridges are wave built and therefore of lake

origin. The plain, the gravel ridges, the foot-hills and the high

escarpment are the chief topographical features of the grape belt.

The grape soils of the district, as mapped by the Bureau of Soils of the

United States Department of Agriculture,[96] are Dunkirk clay, Dunkirk

gravel, Dunkirk gravelly loam, Dunkirk sandy loam and Dunkirk shale

loam. The grapes grown upon the several soils vary somewhat as to

quantity per acre, as to flavor and sugar content and as to shipping

quality.

The largest areas of Dunkirk clay are found running back from the lake

east and west from Barcelona, in the neighborhood of Van Buren Point and

about Dunkirk. In these regions the soil is a clay loam from several

inches to a foot deep resting upon a stiffer and more tenacious clay.

Vineyards located on this soil are very productive but the quality is

not as high as in the fruit grown on the shale loam, though for most

part superior to that produced on the gravel and sandy loams.

Dunkirk gravel soils are found on the ridges at the foot of the

escarpment on the southern boundary of the district from Pennsylvania to

the eastern boundary of the grape district. Throughout most of this

distance there are from one to three parallel ridges varying from a few

rods to a half mile in breadth; at many places the ridges run into each

other or have been brought together by cultivation. It was upon this

gravel that vines were first successfully grown. Grapes upon this soil

ripen a week or more earlier than upon other soils and these lands are

therefore largely planted with vineyards to supply the early market and

they have a larger proportion of early varieties than vineyards on other

soils. The Niagara is thought to do especially well on Dunkirk gravel.

Dunkirk gravelly loam is found running through practically the whole

grape belt at the base or on the top of the gravel ridges; if at the

base, to lakeward of the ridges. It is a sandy loam with much fine

gravel and is underlaid at a depth of three feet with sand and shale

fragments. On the surface it much resembles the gravel soils having had

considerable top gravel brought there by washing and by cultivation. The

grapes grown on these soils are very similar to those produced on the

gravels though there are some minor differences. Some varieties produce

larger berries on this soil, and some sorts, it is claimed, a greater

amount of wood.

The Dunkirk sandy loams occur in large irregular areas bordering the

lake or running from the lake bluff back to the escarpment. By far the

largest of these areas is found about Fredonia and Dunkirk and running

east and west of these towns. A second area is found in the neighborhood

of Brocton and Portland and especially to the north and west. There are

smaller areas east of Barcelona and northwest of Ripley. Nearly all of

the sandy loam soils are found on undulating or rolling land. The soil

is a brownish-yellow loam from a half foot to a foot in depth. There are

some deviations from the type and yet the true sandy loams can be very

easily recognized. The soil is of rather heavy texture making good

farming land and producing large crops of grapes of slightly inferior

quality.

The Dunkirk shale loams are found upon the hill or escarpment. These

form the grape lands farthest removed from the lake. This soil is

comparatively thin, not averaging more than a half-foot in depth and is

hardly ever found a foot deep. It is brown in color with much coarse

fragmentary shale on the surface and underlaid with a considerable body

of heavy clay. Part of the shale loam land lies on slopes too steep and

rough for cultivation but the hillside table lands of this soil are

especially well adapted to grape-growing. The grapes grown here contain

much sugar, therefore keep and ship well, have a high flavor, and are

especially sought for in wine-making; grapes on these soils mature

early, have tough skins, but are only medium-sized berries. The yields

are much more variable on this soil than on the others because of the

great variation in the depth of soil. On deep soils of this loam the

yield is all that could be desired. Because of the lay of the land, and

the nature of the soil, there is much washing and cultivation must be

done judiciously.

The climate is exceptionally favorable for the grape-grower in the

Chautauqua district. It is, if anything, of more importance than the

land; for grape soils are not uncommon, but a grape climate as near

perfection as that of this region is indeed rare. The influence of the

lake in modifying the temperature of the region is the chief climatic

factor. This influence need not be dwelt upon here for it is common

knowledge that large bodies of water temper cold winter weather, hold

back vegetation in spring, equalize night and day temperatures of

summer, lengthen the growing season and ward off autumn frosts. Each of

these influences is highly favorable to the growth of the grape. The

escarpment on the southeastern boundary of the belt has a most decided

influence on the climate chiefly because it confines the influence of

the lake to a narrow belt. When the escarpment becomes low, as at the

two extremities of the belt, grape-growing ceases to be profitable. When

the distance between the lake and the escarpment is great, the climatic

conditions are not so favorable.

The air currents and rainfall of the region are especially favorable.

The in-shore breeze of the day and the off-shore breeze at night keep

the air in constant motion, thus preventing frosts in spring and autumn,

and probably cause in part the great degree of immunity to black-rot and

mildew. Unfortunately, data to determine accurately the rainfall of the

district cannot be had but such as have been taken indicate that the

rainfall is comparatively light for the maturing months of August,

September and October and not heavy for the three preceding growing

months. Residents of the grape belt claim that most of the heavy showers

pass over the hills or down the lake. The whole region is proverbially

free from heavy dews. Rain and dew are favorable to black-rot and other

fungi and the lack of them still further accounts for the immunity to

these pests in the region.

The history of the rise of grape-growing in Chautauqua County forms an

interesting chapter in the economic development of New York. The first

vines in the Chautauqua district were planted by Elijah Fay[97] in 1818,

near the present town of Brocton. These were wild vines of _Vitis

labrusca_ from Deacon Fay's boyhood home in New England. The vines grew

luxuriantly but the fruit was not satisfactory and in 1822 this worthy

pioneer obtained at great trouble roots of Miller's Burgundy,

Sweetwater and Black Hamburg. But the second experiment was even more

disastrous than the first as he got no fruit. The real start was made in

1824 when Mr. Fay obtained vines of Catawba and Isabella from Prince of

Flushing, Long Island. The vines were trained on trellises. The vineyard

covered a plot two by eight rods in extent. From a rise of land near

this spot one now sees grapes everywhere, probably a greater acreage of

them than can be seen from any other spot east of the Rocky Mountains.

In 1830 Deacon Fay made ten gallons of wine, the first for the region.

In 1834, Lincoln Fay, a nephew of Elijah Fay, started the sale of grape

vines but not many vines were sold for commercial plantings until as

late as 1850. In 1859 there were in the town of Portland but twenty

acres of bearing grape vines where now are thousands. During the decade

that followed, the Concord was generally introduced giving the

viticulture of the region a great impetus. Grapes were not yet grown for

table use to any great extent and a large acreage could not be used for

wine-making. In 1859 a wine-cellar was built by Fay, Ryckman[98] and

Haywood at Brocton and for a long while this company used almost the

total crop of the region. It was not until the early seventies that the

grape-growers sought other markets than the wine-cellars. In 1870 there

were about 600 acres of vineyards in Chautauqua County.

The first table-grapes of the region were packed in twenty-pound splint

baskets. Dunkirk was the primary marketing place and the fruit was

shipped from here to various large cities by through freight. The

transportation facilities were not satisfactory and in 1880 Jonas Martin

of Brocton tried the experiment of shipping a carload of grapes to

Philadelphia. This was the first carload of grapes sent from Chautauqua

County. In 1906, 4690 carloads were shipped and 844 were converted into

wine and grape juice, representing all told $2,482,822.[99] Until 1883

the markets were confined to nearby cities but in this year a carload

was safely sent to Spokane, after which time markets were found from the

Atlantic to the Pacific and from the Gulf to Upper Canada. The first

grape-growers' union was formed in 1886 as the Chautauqua Grape Growers'

Shipping Association and its organization marked a new epoch in the

grape industry of the district. Smaller and larger organizations have

since been formed and at the present time about 80 per ct. of the entire

crop is handled by a growers' union known as the Chautauqua and Erie

Grape Company.

According to Mr. G. E. Ryckman, in the early days of the grape industry

in this region the fruit was shipped in round paper baskets holding from

three to five pounds; later these were made of wood. Sometime in the

early seventies twenty-pound splint baskets, which were supposed to be

returned to the owners, were introduced. These were superseded by the

twelve-pound climax basket; the size of this basket was soon reduced to

ten pounds, then to nine, then to eight. Meanwhile a small five-pound

basket made on the same lines as the larger one came into use but soon

shrunk into a four-pound receptacle. The eight and the four-pound climax

baskets are now generally used throughout the region. Increasing

quantities are now being shipped to large cities in trays with slatted

tops holding about forty pounds each; these grapes are used by the

purchaser for wine-making. The wine and grape juice industries of the

region have been touched upon in the general discussion of these

industries.

An actual canvass made by this Station in the winter of 1906-7 shows

there are in the Chautauqua grape belt at this time 30,000 acres of

grapes. The census report of 1900 gave the number of vines for the

county as 11,914,706, which at the usual number of vines per acre gives

about 20,000 acres for the district. This figure was probably low,

though that of the Station for 1907 may be somewhat high. The acreage is

distributed in towns approximately as follows: Portland 9500; Westfield

5700; Ripley 5700; Pomfret 4600; Hanover 1950; Sheridan 1950; Dunkirk

600. A correspondent writes that the grape shipments for 1907 indicate a

considerably larger acreage for the towns of Hanover and Sheridan than

are here given. The average yield of grapes is a little less than two

tons per acre for the region. The value of vineyards varies from $100 to

$400 per acre.

The crop for the past seven years calculated by _The Grape Belt_[100]

from figures secured from the railroads are as follows:

"Season of 1900 8000 carloads

"Season of 1901 6669 carloads

"Season of 1902 5062 carloads

"Season of 1903 2952 carloads

"Season of 1904 7479 carloads

"Season of 1905 5362 carloads

"Season of 1906 5634 carloads"

The seeming decrease in carloads shipped as the years progress is far

more than made up by the greater use of the fruit in local wineries and

grape juice factories.

According to figures gathered in the preparation of this work about 90

per ct. of the grape acreage of the region is set to Concord followed by

3 per ct. of Niagara, 2 per ct. of Worden and 1 per ct. each for Moore

Early and Catawba with the remaining 3 per ct. made up of a dozen or

more sorts among which Delaware leads.

The shipping season in this district begins early in September and lasts

well into November though late varieties, as Catawba, and small lots of

Concord are held some weeks longer. Improved storage facilities are

yearly lengthening the season.

Several systems of pruning and training are in vogue in the district but

the majority of the vineyards are pruned and trained in a system

peculiar to Chautauqua County. The posts are from six to eight feet in

height, one to each three vines; two wires complete the trellis. The

lower wire is from 28 to 32 inches from the ground and the second from

22 to 36 inches above the first, the distance being changed as the vine

comes to maturity. The grapes are trained according to the upright

system and the vines are renewed to short horizontal arms and but few

canes are taken out each year; the trunk reaches only to the lower wire.

The arms are loosely tied to the lower wire and the canes and bearing

shoots to the wire above. Cultivation varies greatly but the best

growers practice close cultivation and make use of fertilizers; the

cover crop is growing in favor. Spraying is not very general as the

region has been remarkably free from pests. The chief insects now

encountered are the grape-vine fidia,[101] the flea-beetle,[102] the

grape leaf-hopper[103] and the grape berry moth.[104] The several fungal

diseases found in this region are, about in order of importance,

black-rot, downy mildew, or "brown-rot," powdery mildew, and

anthracnose, or "bird's-eye rot."

THE CENTRAL LAKES DISTRICT

Several important areas of vineyards are grouped about the central lakes

in western New York. While there are at least three distinct localities

in this district, namely, the areas about the three lakes, Keuka,

Canandaigua, and Seneca, yet the soils, climate, varieties and methods

of caring for vineyards and product are so nearly alike that all may be

treated as one district. The vineyards are in five counties, Ontario,

Yates, Schuyler, Steuben and Seneca. The Keuka area, in Yates and

Steuben Counties, is by far the largest; and the region is often called

the Keuka grape district. Vineyards surround Keuka Lake and all but the

northern end of Canandaigua Lake, but only on the banks of the southern

half of Seneca Lake are grapes grown. The somewhat extensive vineyards

about Naples, south of Canandaigua Lake; Bath, south of Keuka Lake; and

of Romulus between Seneca and Cayuga Lakes, belong in the Central Lakes

district.

The geology of the Central or Finger Lakes has been studied by many

workers and the geological history of these remarkable bodies of water

is now well known.[105] It is very generally agreed that these lakes

fill, in part, preglacial valleys and that the valleys were transformed

into lakes by glacial action. The basins of the lakes may have been and

probably were deepened by the erosive action of glaciers but it is

fairly certain that there were pre-existing valleys which were dammed by

glacial deposit.

The topography is more or less rough and broken. The steep hillsides of

the lakes were formed not only by erosion but by the tilting of the

land. Beside these hillsides of the lakes to give character to the

topography of the region, there are ranges of hills and the remains of

some moraines, so that in general the land is very uneven. This is

especially true of the parts of it devoted to grape-growing though in

some grape sections there are many stretches of smooth and regular

vineyards.

The soils of this great region vary much, as is always the case when

land is made by glacial erosion and deposit of glacial drifts. On a

single farm the soil may be thick and fertile in one part and thin and

poor in another; it may consist largely of clay in one part and of sand

and gravel in others. The grape soils in the Central Lakes region are,

in particular, of miscellaneous types, embracing, in one place or

another, nearly all of the soils in the Dunkirk series described in the

discussion of the Chautauqua district. Probably the Dunkirk clay loam,

often very shaly and stony, is the most common of the several soils of

the region. There are also considerable areas of a shaly soil which

possibly do not belong to the Dunkirk types, not having been influenced

by water action as are true Dunkirk soils. On the slopes and hillsides

the land is sometimes rough and stony with but a thin covering of soil

and with out-croppings of bed rock. The influence of the various soils

on the grape has not been studied as in the Chautauqua district but, as

noted, the soils in the two districts are in many cases similar so that

the discussion of the influence of the several types given for the

Chautauqua district will apply in large part to the Central Lakes

district.

The Central Lakes have a very perceptible influence on the climate of

the region. The lakes are deep and conserve warmth. The water of Seneca

Lake is so deep, and consequently warm, that it has been known to freeze

over only a few times in the past hundred years. The winter climate in

this region is much less severe than in adjacent territories. Not only

does the water modify the severity of the winter climate but the

enclosing highlands materially assist in keeping in the warmth of the

valleys. Since the lakes run, generally speaking, north and south, the

winds are deflected to these directions very largely. In the summer,

both days and nights are cooler and the climate more equable near the

lakes. These modifications of climate are all favorable to

grape-growing.

The first grapes grown in this district, so far as records show, were

set by the Rev. William Bostwick at Hammondsport in 1830. The varieties

were Isabella and Catawba and these he succeeded in raising to

perfection. From this time onward scattering vines were planted in

gardens about the three lakes. About 1836 Mr. J. W. Prentiss, originator

of the Prentiss grape, planted a small vineyard at Pulteney from which

considerable fruit was sent to market from time to time and the vineyard

was constantly enlarged. In 1853 a commercial vineyard was set out by

Andrew Reisinger, a German vine-dresser, consisting of two acres of

Isabella and Catawba at Harmonyville in the town of Pulteney. Reisinger

trained, pruned and tilled his vines, operations unheard of before in

the district, and was rewarded with crops and profits which stimulated

grape culture in his and nearby neighborhoods.

In 1855 the Hon. Jacob Larrowe and Mr. Orlando Shephard planted small

vineyards of Isabella and Catawba in Pleasant Valley near Hammondsport

and were so successful that in 1858 their vineyards were greatly

increased and others in the valley embarked in the business of

vine-culture. Viticulture was now fairly started and the industry grew

apace from 1858 onward. In 1860 two hundred acres of grapes were set in

Pleasant Valley alone and elsewhere on Keuka Lake large plantings were

made. Grapes brought from fifteen to thirty cents per pound and a

bearing vineyard at this time was as good as a gold mine.

Plantings were begun in the Yates County portion of the Keuka district

in 1855 when Mr. W. W. Shirland set a small vineyard of Isabella in

Benton township.

There seem to be no records as to the first plantings about Seneca and

Canandaigua Lakes but all available information indicates that plantings

about these two lakes came in the spreading of the industry from Keuka

Lake. E. A. McKay of Naples seems to have had a vineyard of some extent

as early as 1848 from which he sold fruit. There must have been

vineyards of considerable size about Avon in Livingston County in the

early fifties; for Larrowe, Shephard and others obtained cuttings at

this place in 1855 for their vineyards in Pleasant Valley. Who owned

these Avon vineyards, and what their extent was, does not appear.

The first commercial shipment of any considerable amount beyond the

towns nearby was made in 1854 when Mr. J. W. Prentiss shipped a ton of

Isabella packed in tubs to New York City. The tubs were made by cutting

apple barrels in half and were packed half full when a thin board

partition was put in after which the tub was filled and covered. The

consignment reached the city in fair condition and brought fifteen cents

per pound but a second ton shipped in the same way "broke" the market.

John Mead of the town of Benton introduced the Concord in this region in

1861 and the same year Henry Rose of Penn Yan set the first Delaware to

be planted commercially in the district. The Concord soon took the place

of the Isabella but could not displace the Catawba as it did in the

Chautauqua district. The Delaware grew in favor and rapidly assumed

third place in the list of varieties about the three lakes, a position

which it still maintains, though it is closely followed by the Niagara.

By 1860 grape-growing had become so general that the need of further

outlets for the fruit was felt and the Pleasant Valley Wine Company was

formed for the manufacture of wine and brandy. For several years

following, this company used about one-third of the output of Pleasant

Valley, helping very materially to steady the market for the whole

district. A few years later another large company, the Urbana Wine

Company, was formed; and when still later it was discovered that the

champagne made about Keuka Lake was superior to that made in any other

part of America and that, with experience in making, it rivalled the

champagne in France, wine-making became an important adjunct to

grape-growing in this district. Now there are about twenty-five

companies making wine and champagne on or near the shores of the three

lakes, the industry having its center on Keuka Lake. Wine-making is

still in its infancy and because of the demand it creates for grapes,

and the high prices paid by the wineries, will continue to exert a most

favorable influence on the viticulture of the district. There is but

little unfermented grape juice made about the Central Lakes.

A valuable asset of this district is its long range of season. Grapes

ripen from one to two weeks earlier about these lakes than they do in

the Chautauqua belt. Thus the Concords grown here are well out of the

way of those grown in the Chautauqua district. The Catawba, which ripens

late and is a "good keeper", can be kept in fine condition until

midwinter or later. The range of season in this district, then, is from

the first part of September until February or even March.

Though there have been grape-growers' unions for marketing the fruit of

this district at various times, most of it now goes through the hands of

individual buyers. An exception is the product of the large vineyards of

Niagaras in Seneca County, the fruit of which is marketed with that of

the product of other Niagara vineyards of the Niagara district of

western New York through a union of growers.

The grapes in this district are variously trained but the high renewal

system is used chiefly. In this system the head of the trunk is from

twenty to thirty inches from the ground. Usually the trellis has three

wires, the lowest about twenty inches from the ground and the others at

distances of eighteen inches apart. New canes are brought out from

renewal stubs and once in two or three years an attempt is made to bring

them directly from the head of the main trunk. This system is

particularly well adapted to the Catawba and Delaware so generally grown

in the lake region. Thorough cultivation is practiced and the fall cover

crop of oats, barley or clover is coming into favor.

It is difficult to ascertain the acreage in this district. Taking the

figures of the census of 1900 and those of a canvass made by this

Station in the winter of 1906-7 the acreage in the several counties is

about as follows: Yates, 7940; Steuben, 5570; Ontario, 2630; Schuyler,

1014; Seneca, 1540; total 18,694. These figures are slightly larger than

the estimates of grape-growers and buyers but chiefly so because they

take in scattered plantations throughout the several counties. Thus in

all of these counties there are a surprisingly large number of Niagara

vineyards in out-of-the-way places, set during the Niagara boom of the

eighties. To this Central Lakes district might also be added 500 acres

of commercial vineyards in Livingston County; 250 in Cayuga and 250 in

Tompkins Counties. The total valuation of the crop in this district in

1900 was $943,964.

Insects are not as troublesome in the Central Lakes district as in the

Chautauqua district. The grape-vine fidia, or root-worm, one of the

worst of the insect pests of the grape, is not yet destructive in this

region. The grape leaf-hopper and the grape-vine flea-beetle are

possibly the worst of the insects infesting the grapes about these

lakes.

But fungi are more troublesome than in the Chautauqua district; probably

because the climatic conditions are more favorable to the development of

these pests about these smaller lakes than near Lake Erie. The five most

troublesome diseases, named about in order of importance are

black-rot,[106] downy mildew,[107] or "brown-rot", powdery mildew,[108]

anthracnose,[109] or "bird's-eye rot" and chlorosis,[110] or

"yellow-leaf". Vineyards are very generally sprayed in this district and

usually with satisfactory results. Grape-growers have learned that

certain varieties are much more susceptible to some of the diseases than

others and plant accordingly.

HUDSON RIVER DISTRICT.

The region along the Hudson River forms the third largest grape district

in New York. According to the census of 1890 there were 13,000 acres of

grapes in this district but in 1900 the returns gave less than half that

acreage. The great falling off was due to the taking out of a

considerable number of old vineyards which had been planted with too

many varieties, or with worthless varieties, or in some other respect

were poorly set plantations. It is doubtful whether the acreage in 1907

is greater than in 1900 but the industry is in a more healthful and

prosperous condition now than then.

An estimate of the present acreage, and its distribution, made in the

preparation of this work, gives the standing of the district as follows

by counties: Columbia, 865 acres; Dutchess, 448 acres; Orange, 865

acres; Ulster, 4021 acres; total, 6199 acres. Beside the above there

are, of course, some scattering vineyards. There are only two or three

wine-cellars in the district and probably 95 per ct. of the product of

the vineyards is sold for table grapes or to those who make wine in

small quantities.

The grape lands of the Hudson River Valley are found very largely in the

geological division known as the Taconic Province.[111] This province is

a broad valley which extends from Pennsylvania across New Jersey, taking

in Orange and parts of Ulster and Dutchess and Columbia Counties, then

passing out of the State. The rocks in this geological division are

shales, slates, schists, and limestones; and the soil is derived from

these rocks. The grape lands, for most part, are those in which there is

much shale or slate and in more or less coarse fragments, the finer

particles being clay or gravelly loams. The district is more or less

hilly, some of the vineyards being in valleys of a few acres extent,

others in broad, gently undulating plains and still others on

comparatively steep hillsides.

The climate of the Hudson Valley changes rapidly as one goes up the

River because of the diversity of its physical features and the wide

variety of atmospheric influences to which it is subject. In the part of

the Valley in which grapes are grown the summer temperature is high

owing to the position between ranges of mountains and to the southerly

winds which prevail at this season. In the winter the winds are

northerly and the temperature is often low making the culture of tender

grapes hazardous. The influence of the river, really a broad estuary in

the grape regions, at all seasons is most favorable for fruit-growing.

The lowlands of the Hudson Valley receive a somewhat small amount of

rainfall as compared with the rest of New York because when moisture is

being carried inland from the Atlantic it is largely precipitated by the

mountains and highlands of New England. This is favorable to

grape-growing. Another desirable feature of the rainfall of this Valley

is that the maximum summer downfall is in July whereas in many parts of

the State it is in September or October. This relatively light rainfall

in the maturing months is more marked in this than in any other of the

grape districts of the State.

The recorded history of commercial viticulture dates back to 1827 when

Mr. Robert Underhill and his two sons, R. T. and W. A. Underhill,

planted a vineyard of Catawba and Isabella at Croton Point which

eventually covered seventy-five acres. For some years this vineyard

practically supplied the large markets of the region with grapes. In

1829, Rufus Barrett of New Paltz, began shipping Isabella grapes in

small quantities to the New York market. Barrett lived in a settlement

of French Huguenots, who after having experimented more or less with

European sorts, early in the nineteenth century began planting native

varieties. It is probable that Barrett obtained his inspiration for

planting and knowledge of vine-growing from these Frenchmen.

In 1837 a French vintner, John Jacques, set out a vineyard for

wine-making at Washingtonville, Orange County. The varieties set were

Catawba and Isabella, purchased from Prince of Long Island. Some of

these vines are still living, vigorous and thrifty at three score years

and ten. The original plantation consisted of but a half acre but in

1838 this was increased to ten acres. This is probably the oldest

vineyard of native grapes in New York. The third year from the planting

of this vineyard wine was made, and has been made at Washingtonville

ever since, so that this community may claim the oldest winery as well

as the oldest vineyard in the State.[112]

William T. Cornell planted a vineyard of Isabellas near Clintonville,

Ulster County, in the year 1845. Mrs. Cornell and Mrs. William A.

Underhill were sisters, so that Cornell's vines came from Croton Point.

A. J. Caywood, of Marlboro, was a brother-in-law of Mr. Cornell. Thus

the inspiration of this noted viticulturist to plant grapes, and to

originate new sorts, may be traced directly back to the Frenchman,

Parmentier, who, as we have seen, furnished the Underhills with their

vines and gave them instructions for their care. The Catawba and

Isabella were grown almost entirely until the introduction of the

Delaware and Concord, after which the first named sorts dropped out

entirely, being subject to mildew and ripening late in the season.

The Valley of the Hudson has more reason to be called the birthplace of

American viticulture than any other of the grape-growing districts of

the country. The grape and wine industries, as we have seen, were early

started here. Prince's Linnæan Garden at the mouth of the Valley was the

first distributing agency for American grapes. Its owners did more than

distribute grapes, they distributed knowledge and trained men. A. J.

Caywood of Marlboro, J. H. Ricketts of Newburgh, Stephen Underhill at

Croton Point, Dr. A. K. Underhill at Charlton, Dr. C. W. Grant at Iona,

W. D. Barns of Middlehope, Dr. William M. Culburt of Newburgh, were

notable early originators and experimenters with grapes and from their

vineyards have come some of the best of our native varieties. Kniffin,

the Downings, and Buel are other familiar names in viticulture and

horticulture of those who lived on the Hudson and who have helped to

invest the region with sentiment and with interest for the grape grower.

The number of varieties grown in this region is far greater than in

other parts of the State; as would be expected from its having been the

birthplace of so many and from its nearness to large markets where fancy

sorts can be disposed of to advantage. The Concord leads in acreage

followed in order of acreage by Delaware, Niagara, Worden, Moore Early,

Bacchus, Pocklington, Campbell Early, Hartford and Vergennes after which

come a great number of less well-known sorts grown in acre or less

quantities. The value of the crop in this district in 1900 was $298,350.

During the early years of grape-growing along the Hudson the methods of

training were essentially those used in Europe. The vines were kept well

headed back and were trained to stakes of varying heights. It did not

take long to discover that for our native grapes the vines must be so

trained as to give the fruit and foliage the greatest possible amount of

sunshine; to regulate the bearing wood; to permit them to bear just so

much and no more fruit; and to control the height of the main trunk.

Soon distinctive systems for native grapes arose and one of the earliest

of these originated with William Kniffin of Ulster County. This system

still bears his name and is most generally used either as it was first

practiced or in some of its modifications. In the Kniffin system, and

its modifications, the trunk is carried to the top wire and the bearing

shoots are allowed to droop; for this reason this method of training is

often called the _drooping_ system in contra-distinction to the upright

systems hitherto mentioned in which the bearing shoots are tied to wires

above the canes from which they grow. The Hudson Valley growers claim

that the Kniffin system is especially desirable for the strong growing

sorts like Concord, Worden, and Niagara but admit that for the slender

shorter growing kinds like Delaware and Catawba the upright system is

best.

As is always the case when fruit is grown near to the market in which it

is sold, there is little uniformity in the packages in which it is

shipped and the manner in which the fruit is packed. Most of the fruit

from the vineyards along the Hudson goes to market in climax baskets of

the two standard sizes. Some of the growers pack two, or even three

varieties, in one package for the purpose of giving a range in color and

quality. The shipping facilities along the river are unexcelled. Most of

the grapes go by boat down the Hudson to New York City. In this case the

fruit is loaded late in the evening and reaches its destination early

the next morning. The rail connections to New England cities are good

and large shipments go eastward by rail while smaller quantities go

inland and south. The fruit is not marketed through unions nor has

co-operative selling been tried, the nearness to market obviating the

necessity of co-operation.

The insect pests in this district are neither numerous nor particularly

destructive, the grape leaf-hopper and the grape-vine flea-beetle being

most common. Spraying for insects is not generally practiced. On the

other hand the fungus troubles are serious, the black-rot having been

especially destructive in some sections. The other diseases are much the

same as in the districts discussed. While all of the fungi of the

district are amenable to treatment yet spraying has not been generally

practiced nor have the vines been kept as vigorous and healthy through

cultivation and fertilization as to withstand the attacks of the several

fungi. The decreased acreage of grapes along the Hudson during the past

decade or two is due in some measure to the fact that the grape diseases

have not been controlled. With better knowledge of the life-habits of

the insects and fungi which attack vineyards, and means of combatting

these pests, viticulture should regain the prestige it once held in the

Hudson Valley.

THE NIAGARA DISTRICT.

The Niagara district, the smallest of the several grape areas of the

State, lies along the Niagara river and the southern shore of Lake

Ontario. In it are about 4700 acres distributed in counties as follows:

Erie, 2100; Niagara, 1250; Orleans, 375; Monroe, 700; Wayne, 380. In the

southern part of Erie County the vineyards are grown under conditions

very similar to those we have described in the Chautauqua district; the

treatment given is much the same; the grapes are marketed as are those

in the district to the south and west; and the Concord, as in the larger

district, is the variety most largely grown. But conditions in the

northern and eastern part of the county more nearly approach those along

Niagara river and the Ontario shore so that the county is included in

the Niagara district.

In Niagara, Orleans, Monroe, and Wayne Counties the grape lands are in

what is known as the Ontario plain. This plain has for its western

boundary in the United States, Niagara River; for its northern boundary

Lake Ontario; to the south there is a high escarpment, the Niagara

escarpment, or "the mountain", separating the Ontario plain from the

Erie plain which is an eastward extension of the low plain on the south

shore of Lake Erie. The Niagara escarpment may be seen well at Lewiston

from which point it stretches eastward toward Lockport and westward into

Ontario. The escarpment may be traced to the eastern end of Lake Ontario

where it disappears and the Erie and Ontario plains merge into one. In

the grape-growing counties the Ontario plain varies from four to nine

miles in width.

The plain is more or less rolling throughout its entire length; but in

few places are the hills too steep for fruit-growing. The soils are

sandy, gravelly, or clay loams varying greatly in fertility and in

adaptability for the grape. In parts of the district the soils are stony

and shaly. They belong, so far as they have been studied, to the Dunkirk

series and are therefore quite similar to those of the Chautauqua

district.

The climate, too, is much like that of the Chautauqua district. The

average midwinter temperature is comparatively high; the summer

temperature is equable; and the precipitation of rain and dew light as

compared with inland areas. The influence of the escarpment is not so

marked in the Niagara district as in the Chautauqua belt. A remarkable

feature of the climate of this district is that killing frosts rarely

occur before the close of October, giving a long maturing and harvesting

season for the grape. In the winter the daily range of temperature is

small owing not only to the influence of the water but to the fact as

well that this season is a period of great cloudiness for the region.

In Erie County much of the product of the southern part is marketed with

that of Chautauqua County but to the north, Buffalo makes a splendid

local market. Several varieties are grown for the home market but

chiefly the Concord and the Niagara. These are packed in the various

styles of climax baskets and in slatted crates--the latter for the home

making of wine. The fruit is carted to the market by the grower, or

purchased in the field, in the case of wine-making, by the consumer.

Niagara County is the home of the Niagara grape and this variety is

grown here almost exclusively. The product is sold very largely by the

grower in the open markets of Buffalo and Niagara Falls and is packed in

the several sizes of climax baskets. In the counties to the east of

Niagara the product, almost exclusively Niagaras, is sold at Rochester

or neighboring towns or shipped to the large eastern cities. Much of

this fruit is sold through the Niagara Grape Market Company, a

co-operative union, with headquarters at Lockport, New York.

The Niagara region is the newest of the grape districts of the State.

There were few plantings along the shore of Ontario until 1886 when the

Niagara grape was introduced and vineyards were put out in considerable

numbers throughout the whole extent of the district followed by still

heavier plantings during the succeeding several years. It was soon

demonstrated that the region was well adapted to grape-growing and

especially for the Niagara grape but that there were many soils and

locations wholly unsuitable for vineyards. Consequently during the years

that followed the bearing of the first grapes, many vineyards have been

abandoned so that there are now scarcely as many acres as at the close

of the first period of expansion about 1900. The insect and fungus pests

are much the same as in the Chautauqua district though the dreaded

grape-vine fidia is not yet nearly so common, but, on the other hand,

the black-rot is far more destructive, probably because the Niagara

grape is very susceptible to this fungus.

The grapes of New York · 第 3 / 16 章