IV

Mrs. Clay, of Alabama, in her "Belle of the Fifties" has given a graphic

picture of life in the national capital during the administrations of

Pierce and Buchanan. The South was very much in the saddle. Pierce, as I

have said, was Southern in temperament, and Buchanan, who to those he did

not like or approve had, as Arnold Harris said, "a winning way of making

himself hateful," was an aristocrat under Southern and feminine influence.

I was fond of Mr. Pierce, but I could never endure Mr. Buchanan. His very

voice gave offense to me. Directed by a periodical publication to make a

sketch of him to accompany an engraving, I did my best on it.

Jacob Thompson, the Secretary of the Interior, said to me: "Now, Henry,

here's your chance for a foreign appointment."

I now know that my writing was clumsy enough and my attempt to play the

courtier clumsier still. Nevertheless, as a friend of my father and mother

"Old Buck" might have been a little more considerate than he was with a

lad trying to please and do him honor. I came away from the White House my

_amour propre_ wounded, and though I had not far to go went straight

into the Douglas camp.

Taking nearly sixty years to think it over I have reached the conclusion

that Mr. Buchanan was the victim of both personal and historic injustice.

With secession in sight his one aim was to get out of the White House

before the scrap began. He was of course on terms of intimacy with all the

secession leaders, especially Mr. Slidell, of Louisiana, like himself

a Northerner by birth, and Mr. Mason, a thick-skulled, ruffle-shirted

Virginian. It was not in him or in Mr. Pierce, with their antecedents and

associations, to be uncompromising Federalists. There was no clear law to

go on. Moderate men were in a muck of doubt just what to do. With Horace

Greeley Mr. Buchanan was ready to say "Let the erring sisters go." This

indeed was the extent of Mr. Pierce's pacifism during the War of Sections.

A new party risen upon the remains of the Whig Party--the Republican

Party--was at the door and coming into power. Lifelong pro-slavery

Democrats could not look on with equanimity, still less with complaisance,

and doubtless Pierce and Buchanan to the end of their days thought less

of the Republicans than of the Confederates. As a consequence Republican

writers have given quarter to neither of them.

It will not do to go too deeply into the account of those days. The times

were out of joint. I knew of two Confederate generals who first tried for

commissions in the Union Army; gallant and good fellows too; but they are

both dead and their secret shall die with me. I knew likewise a famous

Union general who was about to resign his commission in the army to go with

the South but was prevented by his wife, a Northern woman, who had obtained

of Mr. Lincoln a brigadier's commission.

V

In 1858 a wonderful affair came to pass. It was Mrs. Senator Gwin's fancy

dress ball, written of, talked of, far and wide. I did not get to attend

this. My costume was prepared--a Spanish cavalier, Mrs. Casneau's

doing--when I fell ill and had with bitter disappointment to read about

it next day in the papers. I was living at Willard's Hotel, and one of my

volunteer nurses was Mrs. Daniel E. Sickles, a pretty young thing who was

soon to become the victim of a murder and world scandal. Her husband was a

member of the House from New York, and during his frequent absences I used

to take her to dinner. Mr. Sickles had been Mr. Buchanan's Secretary of

Legation in London, and both she and he were at home in the White House.

She was an innocent child. She never knew what she was doing, and when a

year later Sickles, having killed her seducer--a handsome, unscrupulous

fellow who understood how to take advantage of a husband's neglect--forgave

her and brought her home in the face of much obloquy, in my heart of hearts

I did homage to his courage and generosity, for she was then as he and I

both knew a dying woman. She did die but a few months later. He was by no

means a politician after my fancy or approval, but to the end of his days I

was his friend and could never bring myself to join in the repeated public

outcries against him.

Early in the fifties Willard's Hotel became a kind of headquarters for the

two political extremes. During a long time their social intercourse

was unrestrained--often joyous. They were too far apart, figuratively

speaking, to come to blows. Truth to say, their aims were after all not

so far apart. They played to one another's lead. Many a time have I seen

Keitt, of South Carolina, and Burlingame, of Massachusetts, hobnob in the

liveliest manner and most public places.

It is certainly true that Brooks was not himself when he attacked Sumner.

The Northern radicals were wont to say, "Let the South go," the more

profane among them interjecting "to hell!" The Secessionists liked to prod

the New Englanders with what the South was going to do when they got to

Boston. None of them really meant it--not even Toombs when he talked about

calling the muster roll of his slaves beneath Bunker Hill Monument; nor

Hammond, the son of a New England schoolmaster, when he spoke of the

"mudsills of the North," meaning to illustrate what he was saying by the

underpinning of a house built on marshy ground, and not the Northern work

people.

Toombs, who was a rich man, not quite impoverished by the war, banished

himself in Europe for a number of years. At length he came home, and

passing the White House at Washington he called and sent his card to the

President. General Grant, the most genial and generous of men, had him come

directly up.

[Illustration: W. P. Hardee, Lieutenant General C.S.A.]

"Mr. President," said Toombs, "in my European migrations I have made it a

rule when arriving in a city to call first and pay my respects to the Chief

of Police."

The result was a most agreeable hour and an invitation to dinner. Not

long after this at the hospitable board of a Confederate general, then an

American senator, Toombs began to prod Lamar about his speech in the House

upon the occasion of the death of Charles Sumner. Lamar was not quick to

quarrel, though when aroused a man of devilish temper and courage. The

subject had become distasteful to him. He was growing obviously restive

under Toombs' banter. The ladies of the household apprehending what was

coming left the table.

Then Lamar broke forth. He put Toombs' visit to Grant, "crawling at the

seat of power," against his eulogy of a dead enemy. I have never heard

such a scoring from one man to another. It was magisterial in its dignity,

deadly in its diction. Nothing short of a duel could have settled it in the

olden time. But when Lamar, white with rage, had finished, Toombs without a

ruffle said, "Lamar, you surprise me," and the host, with the rest of

us, took it as a signal to rise from table and rejoin the ladies in the

drawing-room. Of course nothing came of it.

Toombs was as much a humorist as an extremist. I have ridden with him under

fire and heard him crack jokes with Minié balls flying uncomfortably about.

Some one spoke kindly of him to old Ben Wade. "Yes, yes," said Wade; "I

never did believe in the doctrine of total depravity."

But I am running ahead in advance of events.

Marse Henry: An Autobiography (Volume 1) · 第 33 / 86 题