At the last session of the general assembly of Louisiana, under the

progressive administration of Governor J. Y. Sanders, there were enacted

and made into laws twenty-nine measures relating to conservation of

our natural resources and the preservation of the gifts so bountifully

provided us by an all-wise Providence.

Louisiana leads in the production of lumber, as well as sulphur, and

salt, much mineral oil and gas. In fact, Louisiana leads in having the

greatest store of natural resources.

She has in pine lands, as near as I have been able to figure, about

4,269,928 acres.

In hardwoods, such as oak, gum, willow, persimmon, hickory, magnolia,

beech, elm, sycamore and poplar, 3,338,486 acres.

In cypress approximately 900,000 acres.

We have, in Louisiana, two mills which alone cut daily nearly one and

three-quarter million feet of lumber. Of these the mill of the great

Southern lumber company of Bogalusa, La., and Fullerton, La., is the

largest in the world.

This company is putting in an alcohol plant so that utilization can be

made of waste products and they be manufactured into alcohol. The number

of employees at this plant and their logging operation are about 1,600

to 1,800. Their motto is, “Utilization as well as Conservation.” They

now make charcoal of the limbs, and paper and alcohol of the refuse wood

and sawdust. In a short time they will begin to work the stumps, and in

connection with this I will add that there is more turpentine in a stump

than in any part of the tree. Utilization of the stumps will clear the

lands for farming purposes and these soon will bloom with growing crops.

Louisiana has many bayous and creeks and all of these are lined with

mills and lumber companies which are steadily cutting on the vast supply

at hand. Our forests are teeming with woods of all kinds and Louisiana

has more kinds of woods than any state in the Union.

The long leaf pine of Louisiana obtains preëminence over those of other

states for its superior qualities of strength and elasticity, combined

with comparatively light weight and ease of working, making it adaptable

to many classes of work.

Our cypress, which grows principally in the southern part of the state

and also to some extent in the lower and swampy portions of the middle

and northern portions, is of extremely slow growth, but is the most

lasting of all our woods, and under water is practically indestructible.

We ship more cross-ties of oak and cypress than any other state, a great

many of these being creosoted and exported to foreign countries where

they are in great demand.

Another tree that is springing into prominence is the pecan. East Baton

Rouge has a pecan orchard of 700 acres and the Parish of Iberville has

a number of varieties of several hundred acres each. In some of the

parishes bordering on Bayou Teche, inhabitants are going into the culture

of this tree on a large scale. The profits in this business are large,

each tree producing, when having attained a growth, one or more barrels

of the pecans of which the average price is from 15 to 25 cents per pound.

We are now drafting laws for the protection of timber from devastation by

fire and from indiscriminate logging.

Over in the southwestern part of Louisiana is located the plant of the

Union Sulphur Company, engaged in the mining of sulphur by a novel

process.

The product is mined by being melted by superheated steam pumped down

through the deposits and it is then pumped up in a molten state and

allowed to cool and solidify in vats where it is broken up and shipped to

market.

This mine is one of the largest in the world, if not the largest, and

its output is close to one thousand tons per day. This, I think, shoves

Sicily hard for first place in the production of this mineral.

Borings made by the company to ascertain the amount of sulphur in that

vicinity show fully 40,000,000 tons underlying their holdings.

The discovery of the famous Beaumont oil field in 1901 was the signal for

oil exploration, both in Texas and Louisiana.

Since that time Louisiana has proven to have within her borders oil

deposits second only to the famous Pennsylvania fields. And the deposits

of the Caddo field are generally conceded to be the greatest single field

in the world.

The depths at which oil is found varies from 500 to 2,200 feet in the

different fields.

The Welsh and Jennings fields have produced oil at from 1,000 to 2,000

feet. And while these fields in their beginning produced gushers, they

are now all pumpers and are producing in the neighborhood of 10,000

barrels per day.

Along with oil in the Caddo field have also been found large supplies of

natural gas and this is now being utilized in many ways and will continue

to be, as the supply is seemingly inexhaustible.

A great waste of these valuable mineral deposits was made before pipe

lines were built and receptacles constructed. Now the matter is being

taken in hand and soon, under the conservation measures adopted at the

last general assembly, control of the situation will be complete. There

is still some work along this line to accomplish, and at the next session

of the General Assembly these will be written in our statutes.

The conservation of game and fish, as well as the other natural

resources, is most momentous to the people of our state. Louisiana has

adopted good and sound measures for the protection of her game and fish

and has created a commission with a system of wardens and provides that

hunters shall contribute to the support of the commission for protection

by the payment of a nominal license for the privilege of hunting.

Of course, changes will have to be made, but the ground work has been

done.

Louisiana has in her many streams and water courses, as well as in her

bays and lakes, a vast supply of fish and shrimp. The shrimp and salt

water fisheries furnish employment to a great number of persons. These

are dependent on the supply of this valuable resource and are directly

interested in the protection of it.

The oyster industry during the past year has enjoyed a healthy and

expansive growth, and while the general business depression has affected

the canner, still a great many acres of water bottoms were leased for

oyster culture and other improvements were made.

There are now under lease and cultivation over 14,391.24 acres of water

bottoms at $1.00 per acre per annum, and yielding on an average of two

hundred barrels of oysters per acre.

There are more than 2,700 boats engaged in the oyster industry and

2,400,000 bags were caught last season with a market value of something

over $2,000,000.

The shores of Louisiana are largely indented with lakes, bayous and bays,

where the tides ebb and flow daily, mixing the salt water of the Gulf

of Mexico with the fresh waters of the Mississippi river and the bayous

and small rivers leading therefrom. The area of this water surface,

susceptible to oyster culture, is calculated to be 4,720,502 acres.

There are now under cultivation slightly over 15,000 acres, producing

about 200 barrels of oysters per acre each year, and something like

62,740 acres, estimated, of natural reefs where oysters grow wild and

unaided.

Deducting the leased bottoms and the natural oyster reefs from the total

area mentioned would leave about 4,660,000 acres of barren bottoms at

present unproductive, but which, with the expenditure of labor and a

small amount of money, could be made to yield enormous revenues and be a

great source of food supply.

The oyster industry of Louisiana offers to the people of this country one

of the greatest fields of exploitation and development.

Salt has been known to exist in Louisiana for many years, and has been

mined commercially in one deposit, that of the Avery salt works, since

1852. This deposit is one of pure salt rock and at the present time

nearly a thousand tons a day are being produced. This is only one of the

several similar mines in Louisiana and I have no doubt that there are

many very valuable deposits of salt yet undiscovered and undeveloped.

REPORT FROM MASSACHUSETTS.

BY PROF. FRANK WILLIAM RANE, _State Forester_.

Complying with the request of the officials of this association in

reporting herewith for the state of Massachusetts, I wish to say at

the outset that I feel certainly incompetent to undertake the task

and to point out the numerous activities that the good old Bay State

is fostering. Being a Massachusetts citizen by adoption only, I feel

privileged to express myself more frankly as otherwise my report might

seem prejudiced.

We have in Massachusetts, in the first place, a conservation of the

old-time ancestry which is not only renowned for its brilliant deeds in

the Nation’s early history, but is still firm and abiding even after

these many years. What state has a fairer reputation in its dissemination

of its natural resources and still lives to enter more heartily into the

conservation and restoration of those remaining.

The historic setting and general environment of Massachusetts in the

early days of the Nation are natural resources that constitute an

ever-bubbling fountain. Yearly the pilgrimage to the old Bay State of

thousands upon thousands from throughout the Nation to visit Boston,

Concord, Lexington, Arlington, Cambridge, Salem, Plymouth and a score of

other cities and towns goes to show what the conservation of high ideals

and true patriotism mean.

The state has always been liberal, progressive and a natural leader in

all that stands for education, advancement and enlightenment.

Many wonder at the splendid showing that Massachusetts always makes and

seem confounded at her successful progress. The explanation is that as a

state we do not confine our interests to state bounds, but our people are

equally interested in promoting and developing copper and other mines or

sheep ranches and other industries in the South or West, as much as they

are at home. Succeeding elsewhere means also better opportunities for

home development. In this way mutual associations and enterprises of a

stalwart and permanent nature are established.

The old biblical saying that it is more blessed to give than receive is

literally true of the old Bay State. While she has been generous in the

Nation’s life, yet there are few states that for their size have greater

natural advantages and hold out better prospects for success in the

future.

Contrary to the minds of many, Massachusetts has advantages that are hard

to surpass. I wonder how many have read the article entitled “Golden New

England,” by Sylvester Baxter, which appeared in the Outlook in 1910.

If not, you may be interested in doing so. The author therein portrays

various rural industries and very entertainingly points out their

success. One of our enterprising business houses, N. W. Harris & Co.,

bankers, Boston, very kindly has sent out excerpts to those desiring the

same.

Massachusetts is a state with many manufacturing centers and, therefore,

a great consumer of all kinds of resources, particularly in the raw

material. This material is put through our factories and goes out as the

manufactured article.

Our high standard of education in literature, science and art has evolved

men of usefulness. In the modern or applied sciences we point with pride

to our technical, agricultural and trade schools which are already

accomplishing results toward conservation, restoration and economic

utilization of natural resources.

Massachusetts people began to see the handwriting on the wall many

years ago and even before this Congress was born they were agitating

and accomplishing actual results. Our cities and towns are already well

forearmed with generous water supplies. The great metropolitan water

system of Boston and its suburbs, already a reality, is one of the

greatest engineering feats yet accomplished in its line. Our metropolitan

and municipal park systems are a credit to our people. The state highway

system of Massachusetts needs no introduction to an intelligent audience

like this, as its reputation has attracted road engineers from all

over the world and many states have come to the Massachusetts highway

commission and induced our men away. Dr. Field of the fish and game

commission is here at the convention; hence, he will inform you of

this field of our activity. Simply let me say that our marine natural

resources are far greater than most people realize. Massachusetts has a

large and important coastal boundary and were I able to tell you of the

great possible future we have in mind even for the old historic Cape Cod

Country, I know it would interest you. While the great fishing industries

of Old Gloucester, Nantucket and New Bedford are not as thriving as in

earlier times, nevertheless with the guidance of modern science to water

farming, we have great promise of the restoration of these industries

that will go far toward feeding the Nation in the future.

Speaking of fishing and game, forestry, natural history and Appalachian

clubs, I am frank to say that I believe there are no people on earth

who are more in love with Nature herself, heart and soul, than our

Massachusetts people. We have organizations galore and they are not only

organized but bubbling full of real activity and accomplishing things.

Were you the state forester of Massachusetts, I can guarantee that you

could spend your whole time simply lecturing on conservation or forestry,

as the demands are so great and the work so popular.

In the development of a new nation it invariably follows that conditions

are constantly changing, and as intercourse with other nations through

trade and business relations progresses, the evils and blessings

are shared. While we are greatly indebted to the various countries

of the world for many an introduction, nevertheless now and then we

unfortunately get an insect or fungus development that proves extremely

disastrous.

It would not be fair to Massachusetts in reporting on her conservation

policies did I not mention the great fight that the state has waged for

years against the gypsy and brown-tail moths. These two insects are

indigenous to Europe and while they have their natural enemies and are

under subjection there, upon reaching this country they find an open

field and with no enemies become a veritable pest.

Both species are destroyers of trees. The brown-tail moth devours the

leaves of the deciduous, or hardwood trees only, while the gypsy is no

respector of vegetation and will defoliate evergreens as well, if food

is scarce, although it, too, prefers the deciduous. The brown-tail moths

besides being tree destroyers, give off hairs from the larvae and moth,

which, when brought in contact with the skin of human beings produce a

rash that is extremely irritating. Of the two insects the gypsy moth is

generally considered the worse. The fact that when the white pine, or our

evergreens, are once stripped they die outright; and that the pine in

particular is one of our most valuable species, both from the economic

and aesthetic standpoint, make their protection from the gypsy moth

important.

I will not take time to give you the life histories of these insects, for

should anyone be interested this information can be had by applying to

the State Forester, Boston, Mass. We have illustrated matter in natural

colors showing these insects.

Practically all of our trees in the residential sections of the cities

and towns, in the eastern part of the state, are sprayed annually.

Our main travelled roadsides are sprayed each year. Individuals,

municipalities and the state all coöperate in this work. The annual

appropriation of the state is $315,000 a year. The total expenditure from

all sources, within the state, up to the present time in this work is

estimated at $6,000,000. Besides this the United States Government has

spent in Massachusetts probably $700,000. We have had as high as 2,700

men at work at one time in the busiest season of the year. The renewed

North Shore, our fashionable summer resort, spends practically $100,000 a

year to protect the trees in this section alone.

The state forester’s spraying apparatus is composed of an aggregation of

300 spraying outfits. We use in a single season over 400 tons of arsenate

of lead, the state’s contract alone being for 250 tons a year.

During the past two years the state forester’s department has made great

improvements in power spraying equipment, the cost of spraying woodlands

having been reduced from $30.00, or more, per acre, down to as low as

$6.00 in some instances. Instead of its being necessary to climb trees

as heretofore, the modern power sprayer enables us to spray directly

over the tops of tall trees from the ground. The whole spraying problem

has been revolutionized. It is certainly to be hoped that these insects

may not secure a foothold elsewhere. Surely Massachusetts is doing her

part, and I cannot urge too strongly the necessity of other states and

the Nation realizing the importance of this work. We have introduced

parasites from all over the world, and they are showing great promise.

The work with disease also seems very effective, and I feel optimistic.

It is clear that the practice of modern forestry methods, and the

employment of highly developed mechanical devices, are doing much, and we

trust ere long the parasites and diseases will bring about the desired

balance.

Massachusetts is enthusiastically interested in forestry and the state

forester this past season was given an appropriation of $10,000 for

forest fire work. We have appointed a state forest fire warden, who is

organizing and perfecting a workable system. He is also establishing

lookout stations, and patrol systems in different sections of the state.

Our forest management, reforestation and general forestry, educational

and demonstration work are all well established and progressing. We have

3,000,000 trees in the state nursery for use another season. The state is

planting 1,000 acres each year, and our lumbermen and people generally

are showing interest, and doing more each season. Our appropriation,

including that for forest fires this past year, was $40,000.

In Massachusetts the work of restoration is even of more importance than

conservation when applied to forestry. The annual cut of our forest

products at present amounts to only five per cent of that used each

year throughout the commonwealth for manufacturing, building and other

purposes. Surely we can and ought to supply a larger amount of our own

home grown woods. Although the state has been well cut over, even now our

wood harvests play an important factor in the industries of many of our

rural sections. While we believe thoroughly in conservation where it will

apply, still the more potent force begins farther back. We need to teach

the A B C of restoration in forestry. When our work of reforestation

shall have begun to demonstrate its value, it will be an object lesson,

which will mean much toward perfecting a better state forest policy.

Practical forest restoration, therefore, is what Massachusetts needs

most. If we will reconvert our hilly, rocky, mountainous, moist sandy and

waste non-agricultural lands generally into productive forests the future

financial success from rural sections of the commonwealth is assured.

This is no idle dream; it can be accomplished. Massachusetts is a natural

forest country and all that is needed is simply to assist nature, stop

forest fires and formulate constructive policies. Then we can grow as

fine forests as can be found anywhere. Germany and many of the countries

of the old world have already demonstrated what can be done. Are we to

be less thrifty and far-sighted? Americans do things, when they are once

aroused, and it is believed that reforestation and the adopting of modern

forestry management must be given its due consideration in this state

from now on.

I have been delighted to follow the interest that has been aroused and

the great tendency for all our people to not only welcome and appreciate

the new idea of “conservation,” but to even credit the term or phrase, as

covering every phase of new endeavor.

It is not my purpose to lessen the glory one whit or bedim a single gem

in the crown of the national phrase, “Conservation of Natural Resources,”

nor could I were it to be tried, for the heralded motto has already

stamped itself firmly upon the Nation.

As time goes on, however, it will be found that our popular phrase will

not carry with it the whole panacea for overcoming our wasteful and

depleting conditions, and that new and equally applicable terms, though

perhaps never so popular, will come to express more aptly our real needs.

To my mind the phrase, “Restoration of Natural Resources,” vies with

that of “Conservation of Natural Resources,” and expresses a force to be

aroused in the Nation for good that in many ways surpasses the present

popular one.

We have our forest reserves and minerals, what are left, and now to

conserve them economically is a worthy undertaking, but in the older

sections of the Nation to conserve what we have in depleted and worn-out

lands and forests is to pick the bones of the withered and shrunken

carcass.

Let conservation apply where it may, but the force that is needed in

Massachusetts and all of New England, yea the South, extending even well

into the middle of the Nation, following the great depleting agricultural

cereal and cotton crops on the one hand, and the lumberman’s axe and

forest fires on the other, is greater than this term can begin to express.

The term, “Restoration of Natural Resources,” I claim, meets our present

needs far better and breathes greater hope and definite accomplishments

for our children’s children in the future.

REPORT FROM MINNESOTA.

BY D. M. NEILL.

To undertake to tell you of the resources of the state of Minnesota would

be to recapitulate nearly the resources of all the states of the union.

But I don’t understand that is what we are here for. When the governor

of Minnesota asked me to come down here, I asked him what I was to say

to the people who might be here at this time. He said, “You have been on

the state conservation commission for two years, and you ought to know

what to say,” and in addition to that he said, “Go down and tell them

what we are trying to do in Minnesota.” That is what I will try to tell

you about. In the first place, the men who settled Minnesota looked far

into the future. The state had an immense amount of what was called swamp

lands donated by the government for educational purposes. These men of

the early days, looking to the future, passed a law whereby these lands

could not be disposed of except at a minimum price of what then seemed to

be a ridiculous sum entirely beyond what these lands would probably then

be worth. But these lands are found to be among the most valuable assets

of the state of Minnesota, and have sold at double, triple, ten times,

and some of them for more than a thousand times the minimum price. So

that today the state of Minnesota is next to the state of Texas, has the

largest school fund in the United States—something over $25,000,000—and

with the resources on hand belonging to the fund, it probably, in the

course of time, will amount to over $250,000,000. That looks like

conservation of our school resources.

In our farm work, our agricultural college has been doing of late years

a splendid work throughout the state. In connection with the commercial

clubs it has established a considerable number of experimental farms

in different localities, to give somewhat of a practical education to

the farmers already tilling the soil. The leaders in this movement have

felt that the ordinary processes of sending the children to school,

giving them an agricultural education, trying to get them back to the

farm again—to spread that education was too slow. It seemed necessary to

do something with the parents that they may see the necessity for the

children having an agricultural education, and for that reason the state

agricultural college has been conducting this set of experiments through

the experimental farm. The results are already beginning to show.

Proceedings of the third National Conservation Congress at Kansas City, Missouri, September 25, 26 and 27, 1911 · 第 39 / 45 段