CHAPTER V.

OF MOTIONS IN GENERAL.

59. When a proposition is made to a deliberative assembly, for its

adoption, the proposition may be in such a form as to be put to the

question, and the assembly may be in such a state as to be willing to

come to a decision upon it, at once; and when this is the case,

nothing more can be necessary than to take the votes of the members,

and ascertain the result. But a different state of things may and

commonly does exist; the assembly may prefer some other course of

proceeding to an immediate decision of the question in the form in

which it is presented; and, as it is proper, that every parliamentary

body should have the means of fitly disposing of every proposition

which may be made to it, certain forms of question have from time to

time been invented, and are now in general use, for that purpose.

These forms of question may properly be called _subsidiary_, in order

to distinguish them from the principal motion or question to which

they relate.

60. The different states of mind, in which a proposition may be

received by a deliberative assembly, and the corresponding forms of

proceeding, or subsidiary motions, to which they give rise, in order

to ascertain the sense of the assembly, are the following:

_First._ The assembly may look upon the proposition as useless or

inexpedient; and may therefore desire to suppress it, either for a

time, or altogether. The subsidiary motions, for this purpose, are the

previous question, and indefinite postponement.

_Second._ The assembly may be willing to entertain and consider of a

proposition, but not at the time when it is made; either because more

information is wanted by the members individually; or because they

desire further time for reflection and examination: or because the

assembly is then occupied with some other matter, which has more

pressing claims upon its present attention. The usual motions, under

such circumstances, are postponement to some future day or time, and

to lie on the table.

_Third._ The subject-matter of a proposition may be regarded with

favor, but the form in which it is introduced may be so defective,

that a more careful and deliberate consideration, than can

conveniently be given to it in the assembly itself, may be necessary

to put it into a satisfactory form. In this case, it is most proper to

refer the proposition to a committee.

_Fourth._ The proposition may be acceptable, and the form in which it

is presented so far satisfactory, that the assembly may be willing to

consider and act upon it, with such alterations and amendments as may

be thought proper. The motion adapted to this case is to amend.

61. It is not to be supposed that the subsidiary motions above

specified are the only ones that have at any time been adopted or

used; or that it is not competent to a deliberative assembly to frame

new motions at pleasure; but these are the forms in most common use,

and are entirely sufficient for all practical purposes.[9] Neither is

it to be supposed, that these motions are always applied strictly to

the cases to which they most appropriately belong; several of them are

frequently used to effect purposes, for which others would be more

proper. These misapplications will be taken notice of, under the heads

of the several motions.

9. It is usual in legislative assemblies, to provide by a special

rule, both as to the particular motions to be used, and the order

in which they may be made. Thus, the rule in the house of

representatives of Congress (which is also adopted in the house of

representatives of Massachusetts), is, that, “when a question is

under debate, no motion shall be received, but to adjourn, to lie

on the table, for the previous question, to postpone to a day

certain, to commit, to amend, to postpone indefinitely, which

several motions shall have precedence in the order in which they

are arranged.”

Manual of Parliamentary Practice Rules of Proceeding and Debate in Deliberative Assemblies · 第 5 / 16 章