FOREWORD

Of the many subjects open to the novelist none is more fertile in

interests than the international theme, and none more arresting in

appeal. Clash of character being the starting point of drama we have

it amplified in the international by both sympathy and dissonance.

Mutual attraction between individuals will sometimes overleap racial

differences in point of view; and yet racial differences in point of

view will always be at war with mutual attraction between individuals.

All contrasts, all complexities, are focussed on this single stage,

while one gets as nowhere else the conflict which each new-born

generation cannot but wage against the dictation of the ages. On this

crowded scene bring in that American element to which the dictation of

the ages means relatively nothing and the wealth of the dramatic field

becomes obvious.

It is curious, therefore, that it has been so little touched. It has

been entered, but not very far. The great Russian and French

novelists, with their concentration on the life immediately round

them, in the main ignore it. The English have worked it a little, but

not often, and not with much insight. The truth seems to be that the

European nations, with their strong lines of cleavage, have difficulty

in understanding each other, while they understand America not at all.

Steeped and dyed in their own national prepossessions they regard

other national prepossessions with indifference, amazement, or

hostility. There are exceptions to this statement, of course. I speak

only of general tendencies. The trend of events since the war even

more than the war itself brings home to us the fact that the European

mind is tribal.

The American mind is more open, as it is natural that it should be. It

has its national prepossessions; but it has them less exclusively.

Moreover, it is endowed to an unusual degree with the impulse of

curiosity. It likes to see, to know, to explore. Beyond any other type

of mind it regards a foreigner as a man and a brother, and not as a

foe. To the American a foreigner’s life, habits, prejudices, and

outlooks are of interest. He often likes them. He generally finds them

picturesque. He may think them foolish, but he never thinks them dull.

Being so busily occupied in creating a life for himself he enjoys

inspecting the lives other men have created for themselves, just as a

man who is building a house will examine with care the experiments of

a neighbor doing the same thing.

The international attracts the American, and yet even the American has

no broad international strain in his literature. The theme crops out

occasionally, but is never constant. Two or three writers have made it

specially their own, but they have founded no line. When we have

mentioned Hawthorne in one notable book, Henry James and Marion

Crawford in not a few from each, we have almost exhausted the list of

the great names of the past, while of the present there is practically

no one to quote.

The explanation, if we wanted one, might be found in lack of

authority. Though many writers travel in foreign countries few live in

them with sufficient intimacy to see below the surface. Against

outsiders continental European private life is guarded like a shrine.

The Latin countries in particular know little of the easy throwing

open of the home instinctive to the Anglo-Saxon, so that, as a rule, a

stranger steps within the seclusion of a French or Italian family only

by marriage or some unusual set of conditions.

And yet both marriage and the unusual set of conditions occur.

In the case of the former we who remain in America are not greatly

benefited, since few of the American women who marry into continental

Europe ever tell what they know for the information of compatriots.

The power of absorption of a highly organized social life, like that

of Italy, France, or Spain, is such that not many who enter it ever

come out of it again. They are held by a thousand social and domestic

tentacles, which have no counterpart in happy-go-lucky American

relationships. Amid their surroundings they may always remain alien,

and yet they are enclosed by them, as insects in amber.

It is to the unusual set of conditions that we owe most, and the

author of the novel of which these words are meant to be a prelude has

enjoyed those conditions to an exceptional degree. Diplomatic life has

the special advantage that it establishes close relations as a matter

of course. It admits one to the palace of which the chance traveller

sees only the windows and walls. It knows no slow approaches or

apprenticeships. Not only are the barred doors thrown open, but to the

most sealed society the foreigner in diplomacy is given the key.

Of this _entrée_ not merely to foreign houses and hearths but to

foreign points of view Mrs. Anderson has been always quick to perceive

the potentialities. Revealed by her other books as gifted with a power

of observation at once delicate and shrewd, she has shown a remarkable

faculty for reaching the significance of things beyond the objective

and the ceremonious. She knows the value of European stateliness as

set over against our American slap-dash; and she can also throw into

relief the human spontaneous qualities in our American slap-dash in

contrast to the calculated efforts of European stateliness. In her

game she plays the New World against the Old, and the Old World

against the New, in the spirit of comedy, not without its tragic

points. She uses her hemispheres like cymbals, for resonance and

clash, for emotion and conflict, and also for joy, for wonder, for

laughter, and for the leaping of the heart.

Polly the Pagan: Her Lost Love Letters · 第 4 / 139 题