140 COTTAGE STREET, NEW HAVEN, CONN., June 26, 1922.

DR. CARTER G. WOODSON,

1216 You Street, N. W.,

Washington, D. C.

_My dear Dr. Woodson:_

Your studies in the history of the Negro people have greatly

impressed me with their value and I trust that they will be

continued in the many fields which call for new and careful

investigation. I think there is especial need for exact and

detailed information about the period of "reconstruction" in the

South. Reviewing in my memory the whole period since the civil

war I find a great change in prevalent opinion in the North

concerning the events of the reconstruction. It seems to me that

the champions of secession, of slavery and the southern

oligarchy, have been heard in justification of everything they

did and in arraignment of everything that defeated their designs

with an unsuspicious confidence that has enabled them to mislead

sentiment in the North, especially among the younger people. For

example: a Yale professor of history had an article in the New

York Times, a while ago, declaring that the constitutional

amendments conferring citizenship on the Negroes were wrong and

that the reaction against them in depriving the Negroes of the

vote was justifiable; to which I wrote a reply, mostly in the

language of Mr. Flemming, a native Southerner who had represented

Georgia in Congress, arguing that the amendments were not only

justifiable but indispensable, and the Times would not publish

it, so that I had to give it to the Post. There is a prevalent

opinion that the "carpet baggers" were a sort of monsters. I have

known some of them as estimable men and practical public spirited

citizens of a very high type: Judge Henderson of Wilcox County,

Ala. for example.

Now if you can go to the roots of history in this period and

investigate the facts, with biographical sketches of leading men

as they actually were and authentic records of things that were

actually done, it might help to clarify history.

The incessant whining and propaganda of Southern bigots devoted

to the old regime naturally have an undue influence on

sympathetic listeners. I am afraid that this influence will not

be counteracted as it ought to be till Negro investigators,

historians and journalists learn to tell their side of the story

with greater thoroughness.

Very truly yours,

G. S. DICKERMAN.

NEW BEDFORD, MASS., MAY 15TH, 1916

Room 6, Robeson Bldg.

DR. CARTER G. WOODSON,

Washington, D. C.

_My Dear Sir:_

In reply to yours of the 8th, please find herewith a contribution

in the line of my suggestion to Mr. Baker. I did not mean to

imply I had much material of that nature, and what is sent is

that I could readily find, and would need to take time to go

through my papers to really know what I have. If you can use it

all right; if not, consign it to the waste basket, and no

complaint will be coming.

What I had more in mind was this: In many communities can be

found some one person who has contributed services of value to

race, none the less appreciable from the fact that their

interest and value seem circumscribed locally. That they are so

limited I do not believe, but think of each as the centre of an

ever widening, circling influence for good. To illustrate:

Paul Cuffee was born at Cuttyhunk, Mass., in 1758; was an early

defender of the rights of colored men; when the selectmen of the

Town of Dartmouth, refused to admit colored children to the

public schools, and to make separate provision for their

education, he refused to pay his school taxes, was imprisoned,

and when liberated, built a school house at his own expense, on

his own land, employed a teacher at his own expense, and then

opened his school _without_ race discrimination, a privilege

which his white neighbors availed themselves of as his school was

more convenient and equally as good as those of the town. The

result was colored children ceased to be proscribed along

educational lines. He was a ship owner, builder and export

trader. His story has been published at length, in one of our

dailies, with all the documents in the case. It seemed to me that

such stories would be of general as well as local interest. If

you agree with me in this, Mr. Jourdain would without doubt

forward the clipping to you.

The first colored school-teacher in Boston, was Prince Sanders,

Secretary African Lodge F. & A. M., the first Lodge of colored

Masons in America. He taught a colored school in the basement of

the old Joy Street Church from 1809 to 1812. The first colored

school, private, was opened in 1798, at the residence of Primus

Hall, corner of West Cedar and Revere Streets, Boston, and was

taught by a white man, by name, Sylvester. Its curriculum was

limited to the three "R's."

I am sending you in mail with this a pamphlet copy of

"Proceedings" etc., on pp. 12, 16, 17, you will find statements

of services given by Prince Hall, of general as well as of local

interest and value.

Yours sincerely,

FREDERIC S. MONROE.

The Journal of Negro History, Volume 7, 1922 · 第 173 / 185 题