AN AFTERTHOUGHT

In brief, it seems that the Brazilian institution of slavery was

softer, far less brutal than the United States system. On the other

hand, the United States slave system was probably more efficient, for

the inefficiency of the management of the plantations of sugar in

Brazil allowed the West Indies in the eighteenth century to take the

lead in the sugar, rum, and molasses exports. The United States, under

the slave system, secured pre-eminence in the production of the

world's greatest textile staple, cotton.

It is to be regretted, of course, that slavery has persisted so long,

and still thrives in certain Mohammedan lands. It stands today

outlawed in the new world, but it will always be a source of regret to

progressive citizens of the United States that their country clung to

the institution up to within the memory of many yet living, and that

she did not relax her tight grasp upon the slave until forced to

immediate action in the stress of a fratricidal war. To humane

thinkers of Brazil, it will ever be a source of sorrow that their

nation has only been slave ridden within the present generation, and

even then, egged on to emancipation by the reproaches of an at last

awakened world.

Slavery must have differed in details in one country from that in

another, but after all, it was shameful in Brazil, shameful in the

United States, just as it is shameful at any other spot underneath the

blue sky.

The Journal of Negro History, Volume 7, 1922 · 第 155 / 185 题