SPEECH OF W. A. HAYNE, OF MARION,

_On Outrages In Edgefield County S. C._

The House, in Committee of the Whole, having under consideration

the following message from His Excellency:

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Executive Chamber,

Columbia, March 1, 1876.

HON. ROBERT B. ELLIOTT, Speaker House of Representatives:

_Sir:_--I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of a copy of

a resolution adopted by the House of Representatives and

concurred in by the Senate, by which I am requested to report to

this General Assembly at the earliest practicable moment all the

facts and information in my possession in relation to outrages

alleged to have been committed recently in Edgefield County.

I have the honor, in reply, to say that the information received

by me respecting the matter referred to is, in substance, that,

on the night of the 11th of February, some twenty-five or thirty

mounted men, in disguise, went to the house of James Perry,

living near Ridge Spring, in the County of Edgefield; that they

found in the house Freeman Gardner, his wife, Julia Brooks, a

woman between seventy and eighty years of age, and Zilpha Hill, a

young woman--all colored; that this disguised band took all four

of the immates of the house to a point of about a mile and a

quarter distant and then stripped and whipped them all; that

after the whipping was over, the woman, Patsey Gardner, was

severely and systematically burned by the application of liquid

sealing wax or burning pitch to her back and limbs; that the

young woman, Zilpha Hill, who was pregnant was also beaten and

severely abused, to such an extent as to endanger her life; that

the only pretext for this conduct was given in a remark of one of

the disguised band about John Gaston's goods.

This is the account given by the victims of the outrage, and the

condition of the woman, Patsey Gardner, seems to indicate the

truth of her statements as to the injuries inflicted upon this

woman.

This is the substance of the information in my hands at the

present time.

Very respectfully,

(Signed) D. H. CHAMBERLAIN, _Governor_.

Mr. Hayne said:

_Mr. Chairman_--Perhaps no member regrets this outrage more than

I do, for in the last campaign it was my earnest desire, yea, the

height of my ambition, to bring about not only purity in my

party, but harmony between the two races, and therefore my

regret. I am disappointed, almost discouraged, for it seems as

though 'tis love's labor lost. But, sir, just so long as the

newspapers of the country continue to exert their influence in

this direction will our State be disgraced by these foul

outrages. They fire up the hatred of the hot headed, indiscreet

youths of the State by their incendiary articles, and make them

believe that to slay and scourge all who differ from them in

opinion are doing God and their country a service. They never

heap the ashes of charitable oblivion upon the coals of prejudice

and hate, but continue to replenish it with the most exciting and

fiery appeals. The Edgefield paper makes light of this dastardly

violence done to aged and inoffensive women by ascribing it as

the work of "rash boys." Manly pastime for these brave boys! a

crime sir, that in any other State, and done to any other class,

would have demanded and met with immediate punishment, perhaps in

the Court of Judge Lynch, as was the case in Marlboro County a

few weeks ago, when a white lady was abused, the perpetrators,

two colored men, met with immediate punishment. They would not

have brooked the law's delay. Yea, sir, an outraged community

would have taught these "rash boys" a lesson that I fear they

will learn in no other school, and the courteous Sheriff would

not have been put to the trouble of "inviting them to be

arrested."

But, Mr. Chairman, it happens to be the poor despised Africans

who have tilled their fields for centuries, educated and amassed

for them princely fortunes, and while they were engaged in

riveting tighter the chains of bondage, were engaged in the care

and protection of their defenceless families. Mr. Chairman, I

ask, is this the mode to bring about harmony and prosperity? Will

this tranquilize this already distracted country? No, sir. On the

contrary, it will raise to its highest temperature the ill

feelings of an outraged people, and cause them to adopt for their

redress _lex talionis_, in opposition to the Edgefield _lex

loci_, as Mr. McDuffe truthfully says, "God has planted in the

breast of man a higher and holier principle than that by which he

is prompted to resist oppression; the vilest reptile that crawls

on the earth, without the gift of reason to comprehend the

injustice of its injuries, would bite, or sting, or bruise the

hand by which they were inflicted. Is it to be expected, then,

that freemen will patiently bow down and kiss the rod of the

oppressors?" I had hoped that the swift retribution that followed

the K. K's reign, and the withering rebuke administered by their

own counsel, (Hon. Reverdy Johnson,) would have put an end to

these inhuman and disgusting outrages; but, sir, the newspapers

must live and thrive, and this can only be done by a healthy

subscription list, and, in order to swell that list, they must

excite the worst passions of depraved men and pander to their

prejudices.

Are the disgraceful scenes that darkened the history of South

Carolina and cast a foul blot upon her proud escutcheon to be

re-enacted? It must not. If we expect to enjoy peace and

prosperity in our State, we must be more mindful of the rights of

each other, more tolerant in our political views, and finally,

leave the punishment of violators of the law to Courts of

Justice, and not constitute ourselves a Vigilance Committee for

every imaginary wrong. The Courts are certainly doing their duty,

as our increased appropriation for the penitentiary will evince.

If this course of action is followed, then, and not until then,

will South Carolina blossom as the rose, and peace and prosperity

flow as a river within her borders.

Again, Mr. Chairman, if the people of that and any other County

would only turn away from the siren voice of selfish

office-seekers, and put in office men who would dare to do their

duty at all times and in all places, without fear, favor or

impartiality, then, sir, would their rights be secured, and they

would sit down under their own vine and fig-tree, with none

daring to molest or make afraid; then would these lawless men

respect the rights of the occupants of the humblest cabin; for

the law properly administered would indeed be a terror to these

evil doers, and wherever that aegis of America's honor, and her

citizen's protection floats, men would fear to disregard the

rights of his fellows or take the law into their own hands; and,

my fellow-citizens, let me entreat you, in the exercise of your

rights as citizens hereafter, select only such men as are worthy

of these high offices--men who will do their duty. When I have

given such advice hitherto you have scorned it, but take heed in

future, for your interests, the security of your rights, make it

an imperative duty on you.

Mr. Chairman, if departed spirits are visitants of this earth,

and familiar with the actions of men, the spirits of the

patriotic Rutledge and of the sainted Gasden must have wept tears

of anguish over the degeneracy of these men bearing their

patronymics as they witnessed the outrages (the details of which

are heart sickening) which were perpetrated upon those

inoffensive women. Has the chivalry of South Carolina degenerated

thus far? Is this the work of her brave sons? Could they find no

more worthy foe than an aged, infirm woman, brutally maltreated

and her person exposed, who, even if guilty, should have excited

their sympathy? Another, in a condition that would have appealed

not in vain to the protection of savages, much less civilized

men, cruelly beaten, and her life and that of her unborn child

endangered thereby. Shame on you, degenerate sons of a brave and

chivalrous ancestry! The recording angel in heaven's chancery

must have shed tears as, with his diamond pen, he noted this

additional evidence of man's depravity. I am no advocate of the

"bloody shirt" doctrine, neither do I endorse the rash

sentiments expressed by the member from Charleston, (Mr. Davis);

but inasmuch as His Excellency has furnished this House with

official information of this outrage, I have felt it my duty as a

representative to express in positive, forcible terms my utter

abhorrence and condemnation of this brutal outrage. The Governor

has faithfully performed his duty in furthering the arrest of the

guilty parties, and I hope the Court of justice will administer a

lesson that will not soon be forgotten by that community. The

laws are adequate; we simply require efficient and faithful

officers to execute them; and as a legislative body we have done

our duty in condemning this outrage, the punishment of which we

leave to another tribunal--the Nemesis of justice.

The Journal of Negro History, Volume 7, 1922 · 第 137 / 185 题