THEIR PUBLIC SERVICE PRIOR TO MEMBERSHIP IN CONGRESS

Perhaps the most accurate method whereby one's capacity for the

performance of any service may be measured is that which seeks, first,

to establish the experience of the individual in the performance of

the identical or similar services, and second, to evaluate the degree

of skill with which the individual, at a given time, performs the

particular service. Regarded in this light, therefore, we subject the

Negro Congressmen to this test: As measured by their experience in

public positions of trust and confidence and by their grasp of the

great public questions at that time current, to what extent did they

show capacity for public service?

The first part of our query lends itself to solution without

difficulty. Indeed, one may with great ease establish the fact that,

with but few exceptions, these men, prior to their election to

Congress, had held public offices of honor and trust. A case in point

is that of John Mercer Langston[23] of Virginia. While never a member

of a State legislature, Langston was, nevertheless, brought often into

other public service. Indeed he early attracted attention in Ohio by

his service as a member of the Council of Oberlin and by his record in

other township offices. Langston served as dean of the Law Department

of Howard University, and in 1872 became Vice-President and Acting

President of that institution. In 1885 he became President of the

Virginia Normal and Collegiate Institute. He served, moreover, as

Inspector-General of the Bureau of Freedmen, a member of the Board of

Health of the District of Columbia, Minister resident and

Consul-General to Haiti, and Charge d'Affaires to Santo Domingo. His

election to Congress, therefore, was the crowning achievement of a

lifelong public career.

Hyman,[24] O'Hara,[25] Cheatham,[26] and White,[27] all of North

Carolina, had held public office prior to their election to Congress.

Hyman and White had each been members of the State Senate, the former

for six years, from 1868 to 1874, while O'Hara and White had each

served in the lower house of the legislature. Hyman had been a

delegate to the Constitutional Convention of 1868, moreover, while

O'Hara, who had also served as chairman of the Board of Commissioners

of the County of Halifax, had been a delegate to the Constitutional

Convention of 1875. For the eight years from 1886 to 1894, White

served as prosecuting attorney for the second judicial district of the

State, while Cheatham, the fourth member of the North Carolina

delegation, had held but one office, that of Register of Deeds for

Vance County.

It is especially significant that each one of the Negro Reconstruction

Congressmen from South Carolina, namely Cain,[28] De Large,[29]

Elliott,[30] Rainey,[31] Ransier,[32] and Smalls[33] were members of

the State Constitutional Convention of 1868. Two of them, Cain and

Rainey, had been formerly State Senators; Smalls had served two terms

in the Senate and four in the House; while each of the others had been

members for one term or more in the lower branch of the legislature.

Ransier, moreover, had held, prior to his election to Congress, the

high office of lieutenant-governor of the State; Elliott had served as

adjutant-general, and Smalls had held successively the offices of

lieutenant-colonel, brigadier-general and major-general in the State

militia.

Of the two South Carolinians who served in Congress after the

Reconstruction, Thomas E. Miller[34] was for four terms a member of

the lower chamber of the State legislature and for one term a member

of the Senate. Furthermore, he was for one term a school commissioner

of his county, and received also his party's nomination for the office

of lieutenant-governor of the State. Indeed, of the entire South

Carolina group, Murray, alone, seems to have been elected to Congress

without previously having held public office.[35] Jefferson F.

Long,[36] of Georgia, was not unlike Mr. Murray in that the former had

never held public office. In this, his experience differed from that

of Walls, of Florida, who had been a member of the Florida State

Senate.

Alabama sent to Congress three Negroes, Turner,[37] Rapier,[38] and

Haralson.[39] Of these men Haralson alone had had experience in the

legislature prior to his election to Congress, having served in both

branches of that body. Turner was elected in 1868 to the city council

of Selma. Later he became tax collector of Dallas County, but because

of his inability to secure honest men as assistants, resigned the

office. The third member of this group, James T. Rapier, served as an

assessor and later as a collector of internal revenue in his State.

The two Negro United States Senators, Hiram R. Revels[40] and B. K.

Bruce,[41] both of Mississippi, and Representative John R. Lynch[42]

of the same State, had all served in public office before they were

sent to Congress. Senator Revels had held several local offices in

Vicksburg, while Senator Bruce, before he came to the Senate, had been

sheriff, a member of the Mississippi levee board, and for three years

the tax collector of Bolivar County. John R. Lynch, on the other hand,

had served not only as justice of the peace, but also two terms in the

lower house of the legislature, during the latter one of which he was

the Speaker of that body. Unlike the Congressmen from Mississippi,

Nash[43] of Louisiana held office for the first time when his state

elected him a representative to Congress.

Accessible records and impartial and unbiased historians support the

contention that with a few exceptions the record of these Negro

functionaries was honorable. Corrupt government was not always the

work of the Negro. In the chapter on reconstruction in his _The Negro

in Our History_, C. G. Woodson states that local, state, and federal

administrative offices, which offered the most frequent opportunity

for corruption, were seldom held by Negroes, but rather by the local

white men and by those from the North who had come South to seek their

fortunes. In many respects selfish and sometimes lacking in

principle, these men became corrupt in several States, administering

the government for their own personal ends. "Most Negroes who have

served in the South," says he, "came out of office with honorable

records. Such service these Negroes rendered in spite of the fact that

this was not the rule in that day." New York, according to the same

authority, was dominated by the Tweed ring, and the same white men who

complained of Negro domination robbed the governments of the Southern

States of thousands of dollars after the rule of the master class was

reestablished.

The Journal of Negro History, Volume 7, 1922 · 第 59 / 185 题